Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
QUESTION IN
TAXATION
(2005)
II
III
(1)
(2)
a)
State and explain the basis of dutiable value of an imported
article subject to an ad valorem tax under the Tariff and Customs Code.
b)
Distinguish countervailing duty from dumping duty. (5%)
(3)
IV
(1)
(2) a)
State the conditions required by the Tac Code before the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue could authorize the refund or credit
of taxes erroneously or illegally received.
b) Does a withholding agent have the right to file an application for
tax refund? Explain. (5%)
VI
VII
VIII
IX
XI
authorities. If you decide to purchase the car, is the sale subject to tax?
Explain. (5%)
XII
XIII
Josel agreed to sell his condominium unit to Jess for P2.5 Million. At the
time of the sale, the property had a zonal value of P2.0 Million. Upon the
advice of a tax consultant, the parties agreed to execute two deeds of sale,
one indicating the zonal value of P2.0 Million as the selling price and the
other showing the true selling price of P2.5 Million. The tax consultant files
the capital gains tax return using the deed of sale showing the zonal value of
P2.0 Million as the selling price.
Discuss the tax implications and consequences of the action taken by
the parties. (5%)
XIV
(1) Mr. Fermin, a resident of Quezon City, is a Certified Public AccountantLawyer engaged in the Practice of his two professions. He has his main office
in Makati City and maintains a branch office in Pasig City. Mr. Fermin pays his
professional tax as a CPA in Makati City and his professional tax as a lawyer
in Pasig City.
a) May Makati City, where he has his main office, require him to pay
his professional tax as a lawyer? Explain.
b) May Quezon City, where he has his residence and where he also
practices his two professions, go after him for the payment of his
professional tax as a CPA and a lawyer? Explain. (5%)
(2)In 1995, the BIR filed before the Department of Justice (DOJ) a criminal
complainant against a corporation and its officers for alleged evasion
of taxes. The complaint was supported by a sworn statement of the BIR
examiners showing the computation of the tax liabilities of the erring
taxpayer. The corporation filed a motion to dismiss the criminal
complaint on the ground that there has been, as yet, no assessment of
its tax liabilities; hence, the criminal complaint was premature. The DOJ
denied the motion on the ground that an assessment of the tax
deficiency of the corporation is not a precondition to the filling of a
criminal complaint and that in any event, the joint affidavit of the BIR
examiners may be considered as an assessment of the tax liability of
the corporation.
Is the ruling of the DOJ correct? Explain. (5%)