Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Author(s): E. G. H. Joff
Review by: E. G. H. Joff
Source: The Journal of African History, Vol. 18, No. 4 (1977), pp. 626-628
Published by: Cambridge University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/180838
Accessed: 19-04-2016 12:20 UTC
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Cambridge University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The
Journal of African History
This content downloaded from 131.211.208.19 on Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:20:26 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Recently the picture has begun to change. Historians have begun to question
the established truths of the Protectorat period and earlier neglect has encouraged
anthropologists to fill the gap. The recent publication of the proceedings of a
colloquium held in I9731 illustrates the extent to which both historians and
anthropologists have accepted that the Rif and particularly its largest tribe, the
Aith Waryaghar, is a topic of common interest with relevance to the analysis of
indigenous response to European pressure and colonialism. David Hart, already
well known for his numerous articles on Rifian ethnography, has now provided
the first comprehensive study of the region in The Aith Waryaghar of the
Moroccan Rif.
As befits his primary concern as an anthropologist, fully three-quarters of
this massive work (over 540 double-column pages, including glossaries, appendices and index) comprises an ethnographic study of the Aith Waryaghar. As
sedentary agriculturalists, its members are typical of those of most tribes in
northern Morocco, although the Rif itself is heavily overpopulated and provides
a very inhospitable terrain for any agricultural activity. As a segmentary society,
it is typical of rural Morocco as a whole, although the extreme segmentation
and territorial discontinuity-itself a product of the poor resource base-shown
by the Aith Waryaghar and neighbouring tribes is highly unusual. In other
respects the central Rif tribes, the Aith Waryaghar in particular, are unique.
Although many of their political institutions are found elsewhere, particularly
in Berber-speaking mountainous areas,2 they are rarely developed to the same
extremes.
This is particularly true of the blood feud, which in the Rif, Hart believes,
almost became an unconscious form of population control (a function today
taken over by labour migration) and a political regulator in a fiercely egalitarian
society, mitigated only by the relative sanctity of the market place. In markets
1 Abd el-Krim et la Republique du Rif (Paris, I976).
2 Cf. E. Gellner, Saints of the Atlas (London, I969); J. Berque, Structures sociales du
Haut-Atlas (Paris, i962).
This content downloaded from 131.211.208.19 on Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:20:26 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
REVIEWS
627
there was a general agreement that feuds were in abeyance, an agreement which,
if contravened, resulted in severe fines or banishment. The fines themselves
In his account of the Spanish Protectorate in the Rif Hart relies heavily on
work done by Emilio Blanco, for a long time the local interventor, who was an
excellent amateur anthropologist. He demonstrates how Spain wisely made use,
not only of Abdel Krim's reforms, but also of many of his erstwhile lieutenants
in administering the region and how the Rifians themselves adjusted to Spanish
3 Cf. J. Waterbury, Commander of the Faithful (London, I970).
This content downloaded from 131.211.208.19 on Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:20:26 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
new circumstances4-as they had in I955, when the Rifian Army of Liberation was
created in the Spanish zone.
The great merit of David Hart's book is his ability to marry his ethnographical
studies to the recent history of the area-an area which after all provided one
of the greatest examples of indigenous resistance to the implantation of a colonial
regime. He has thus provided the most comprehensive explanation to date of
how the Rif responded to the increasingly obtrusive outside world as well as
clarifying how part of rural Morocco actually operated its complex systems of
acephalous segmentation and alliances.
Needless to say, Hart's explanations and conclusions may be controversial.
Indeed, in so far as they have appeared in his many articles on the Rif, they
have already generated controversy. Germain Ayache5 has made trenchant
criticisms of his claim that the blood feud is a centuries-old and integral part
of Aith Waryaghar society. Ayache, who has himself carried out extensive work
on the Rif, accepts the views of Rifians themselves that the blood feud was of
recent origin, as was their rejection of Sultanic authority. Indeed he claims that
both were the result of European penetration and intrigue aimed at taking over
the area peacefully, rather than by conquest.
Leslie Rout's study covers the Spanish-speaking territories, island and mainland. A black American, teaching at Michigan State University, he has written
his book in a very personal style, but it is none the worse for it. His own observations of Spanish America today are amplified by extensive reading in secondary
sources, and make an enjoyable and moving work of scholarship, which compre4 E. Gellner, 'Patterns of Rural Rebellion in Morocco', in E. Gellner and C. Micaud
(eds.), Arabs and Berbers: From Tribe to Nation in North Africa (London, I973).
Germain Ayache, 'Societe rifaine et pouvoir central marocain (I850-I920)', Revue
Historique, 5I6 (Oct.-Dec. I975), 345-70.
This content downloaded from 131.211.208.19 on Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:20:26 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms