Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Hydraulics Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
b
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
Received 26 April 2004; received in revised form 29 April 2005; accepted 7 October 2005
Abstract
The erosion behaviour of various ne-grained sediment deposits has been investigated in laboratory experiments.
This work mainly focused on tests using sewer sediment in which strong biochemical reactions were observed during the
deposit formation period. A small number of initial tests were conducted in which the deposits were made from
mixtures of clean mineral and organic sediments. The erosion behaviour observed in these tests was compared with
the erosion characteristics for sediments taken from deposits in a sewer. The impact of the biological processes on
physical properties such as bulk density, water content, deposit structure and the erosive behaviour as a function of bed
shear stress are quantied and discussed. Based on these observations it is believed that bio-processes weaken the
strength of the in-pipe sediment deposits. A signicantly weaker sediment surface layer was observed during deposition
under quiescent oxygen-rich conditions. This resulted in a deposit with low shear strength which may be a cause of a
rst foul ush of suspended sediment when ow rates were increased. Comparison between tests with sewer sediments
and the articial representative surrogates suggested that the deposits of the later did not correctly simulate the
depositional development and the resultant erosion patterns observed with the more bio-active sewer sediment.
r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Sewer sediments; Surrogate sediments; Erosion; Deposition; Bed load; Microbiology
1. Introduction
In recent years demands for water quality improvement in natural watercourses has led to the mandatory
assessment of the performance of sewer networks and
where required the implementation of improvements
especially with regard to the ecological impact of sewer
overows on recipient watercourses. Most of the sewer
systems in the EU are combined, as they carry both
domestic wastewater and rain water from urban areas to
treatment plants. They can carry high loads of both
Corresponding author. Tel.: +3292643284;
fax: +3292643595.
E-mail address: Robert.Banasiak@ugent.be (R. Banasiak).
0043-1354/$ - see front matter r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.watres.2005.10.011
ARTICLE IN PRESS
5222
2. In-sewer sedimentation
Combined sewers experience a wide range of time
varying ows during dry and wet weather conditions. In
such sewers, a number of different types of sediment
deposit have been identied and categorised either with
reference to their source or their physical and chemical
characteristics (e.g. Crabtree, 1989). Typically, in-sewer
deposits are mixtures of inorganic and organic sediment
fractions with the proportions depending on factors
such as catchment characteristics, sewer type, sewer
geometry, the prevailing domestic and industrial water
use, and the sanitary habits of the contributing
population. Field observations reported that sewer
deposits have a wide range of physical characteristics
and that they can possess a signicant degree of
cohesion and erosional strength. Fieldwork by Ristenpart and Uhl (1993) reported a range of entrainment
thresholds for ne grained, cohesive-like deposits in
combined sewers. During dry weather, they observed
erosion beginning at bed shear stresses equal to 0.7 N/
m2, whilst after prolonged periods of dry weather ow
the bed shear stress required to initiate motion increased
to 3.3 N/m2.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
R. Banasiak et al. / Water Research 39 (2005) 52215231
5223
ARTICLE IN PRESS
5224
4. Experimental work
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01
Sampling A
Sampling B
0.1
1
Grain diameter d (mm)
10
ARTICLE IN PRESS
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001
5225
Table 1
Sediment compositions and deposit phase durations for tests
112
Test no.
sand
clay
olivestone
mix s-c-o
sewer sed.
0.01
0.1
1
Grain diameter d (mm)
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Duration of
deposit phase
(days)
0
4
10
4
0
4
11
0
1
3
0 (repeated)
1 (repeated)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
R. Banasiak et al. / Water Research 39 (2005) 52215231
5226
25
20
1.6
Test A (H0=10 cm)
15
1.5
10
1.4
H/H0 (-)
5
0
0.0
0.5
3.5
4.0
20% olivestone - 0 d.
20% olivestone - 4 d.
20% olivestone - 10 d.
olivestone/clay - 4 d.
1.3
1.2
1.1
1
0
48
ARTICLE IN PRESS
R. Banasiak et al. / Water Research 39 (2005) 52215231
Table 2
Bulk density for the deposited sewer sediment in the settling
columns for test B
Deposition time (h)
0
44
129
H0 20 cm
1232
946
995
1223
967
991
5227
ARTICLE IN PRESS
R. Banasiak et al. / Water Research 39 (2005) 52215231
5228
10
9
duration 0 days
8
duration 3 days
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280
Time [s]
25
20
15
0 days
4 days
11days
10
5
0
0.0
0.5
3.5
4.0
Fig. 6. Bed load transport against bed shear stress for test series
A.
25
20
15
10
0 days
1 day
3 days
0 days (2)
1 day(2)
5
0
0.0
0.5
3.5
4.0
Fig. 7. Bed load transport against bed shear stress for test series
B.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
R. Banasiak et al. / Water Research 39 (2005) 52215231
5229
Table 3
Water content and volumetric concentration of the sewer sediment placed into the ume for consecutive tests
0 day
1 day
3 days
0 day (2)
1 day (2)
170
456.6
163
472
162
475
148
507
137
537.1
Water content W dened as the ratio between weight of water and solid particles.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
5230
References
Ackers, J.C., Butler, D., May, R.W.P., 1996. Design of sewers
to control sediment problems. CIRIA (London) Report 141.
Ahyerre, M., 1999. Bilans et mecanismes de migration de la
pollution organique en reseau dassainissement unitaire.
These de doctorat de lUniversite de Paris 6, 250p.
Ahyerre, M., Chebbo, G., 2002. Identication of in-sewer
sources of organic solids contributing to combined sewer
overows. Environ. Technol. 23, 10631073.
Ahyerre, M., Chebbo, G., Saad, M., 2000. Sources and erosion
of organic solids in a combined sewer. Urban Water 2,
305315.
Ahyerre, M., Chebbo, G., Saad, M., 2001. Nature and
dynamics of the water-sediment interface in combined
sewers. J. Environ. Eng. ASCE 127 (3), 233239.
Arthur, S., Ashley, R.M., 1998. The inuence of near bed solids
transport on the rst foul ush in combined sewers. Water
Sci. Technol. 37 (1), 131138.
Ashley, R.M., Coghlan, B.P., Jeffries, C., 1992a. The quality of
sewerage ows and sediment in Dundee. Water Sci.
Technol. 22 (1011), 3946.
Ashley, R.M., Wotherspoon, D.J.J., Goodison, M.J., MacGregor, I., Coghlan, B.P., 1992b. The deposition and erosion of
sediments in sewers. Water Sci. Technol. 26 (56),
12831293.
Ashley, R.M., Fraser, A., Burrows, R., Blanksby, J., 2000. The
management of sediment in combined sewers. Urban Water
2 (4), 263275.
Black, K.S., Tolhurst, T.J., Paterson, D.M., Hagerthey, S.E.,
2002. Working with natural cohesive sediments. J. Hydraul.
Eng. ASCE 128 (1), 38.
Chen, G.-H., Leung, D.H.W., Hung, J.-C., 2003. Biolm in the
sediment phase of a sanitary gravity sewer. Water Res. 37,
27842788.
Crabtree, R.W., 1989. Sediments in sewers. J. Inst. Water
Environ. Manage. 3, 569578.
De Sutter, R., Huygens, M., Verhoeven, R., 1999a. Unsteady
ow sediment transport in sewer model. Water Sci. Technol.
39 (9), 121128.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
R. Banasiak et al. / Water Research 39 (2005) 52215231
trap sediments from combined sewers. Water Sci. Technol.
39 (2), 233249.
Vos, P.C., de Boer, P.L., Misdrop, R., 1988. Sediment
stabilization by benthic diatoms in intertidal shoals;
qualitative and quantitative observations. Tide-inuenced
Sedimentary Environments and Facies. D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, MA, pp. 511526.
5231