Nisar 1 To 6

1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kheshgi Nowshera
PC-1 Proforma
Ministry of Energy and Power

Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
DESIGN, SUPPLY, ERECTION, TESTING &

COMMISSIONING
OF 1000-2000 MW (GROSS) RE-GASIFIED LIQUIFIED
NATURAL
GAS (PLNG) BASED COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANT
AT
HAVELI BAHADUR SHAH, DISTRICT JHANG PAKISTAN
Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Energy and Power
PC-1
(Estimated Cost PKR 84,823.14 million)
March, 2015
Ministry Energy and Power Government of Khyber

Pakhtunkhwa
Cleared by Pre-CDWP on 27th Mach, 2015
1 | Page

PC-1 Proforma
National Engineering Services Pakistan (Pvt)

Ltd. (NESPAK)
1-C, Block-N, Model Town Extension, Lahore 54700, Pakistan Phone: 92-42-99090000, Fax: 9242-99231950,
Email: nespakpm@nexlinx.net.pk
Table of Contents
1. Name of project............................................................................. 6
2. Location........................................................................................6
3. Authorities Responsible:................................................................6
4. Plan Provision...............................................................................7
5. Project Objectives:.......................................................................7
6. Description and justification of project (enclose feasibility study
for projects costing (Rs.300 million and above).................................9
6.1. Description of the project......................................................10
6.2. Existing facilities in the area..................................................12
6.3. Justification for establishment of project...............................12
6.4. Technical parameters i.e. input and output of the project and
technological aspects of the project.............................................12
6.7 Information on sources and availability of cooling water and
fuel, calorific value, heat rate and disposal of ash and effluents...22
7 Capital Cost Estimate...................................................................25
7.4. Year- Wise /Component Wise Financial Phasing......................26
8. Annual operating Cost based on proposed capacity utilization and
source of financing:......................................................................... 26
9. Demand and supply analysis.....................................................28
9.1 Existing capacity of services and supply/ demand..................28
9.2 Project demand for 10 years and supply-demand gap............29
9.3 Capacity of the projects being implemented in / private sector
..................................................................................................... 30
9.4 Designed capacity and output of the proposed project...........31
10: Financial Plan............................................................................31
11: Benefits of
the Project And Analysis.......................................31
11.4 Environmental Impact assessment.......................................32

2 | Page

PC-1 Proforma
11.5 Financial Analysis..................................................................33

11.6 Economic Analysis................................................................33
11.7 Employment Analysis............................................................33
11.8 Sensitivity analysis...............................................................33
12 a) Implementation schedule.......................................................34
12 b) Result based monitoring (RBM) Indicators..............................34
13. Management structure and manpower requirement.................34
13.1. Administrative arrangement for implementation of project. 35
13.2. Manpower Requirements.....................................................35
13.3. Job description qualification, experience, age and salary of
each post...................................................................................... 35
15. Certified that the Project proposal has been prepared on the
Basis of instruction provided by the Planning Commission for the
Preparation of Pc-1 for Infrastructure Sector Project........................36
ANNUEXURES
I. Location Map
II. Plant Conceptual Layout
III. Project Capital Cost Estimate
IV. SNGPL Letter for Gas Availability
V. Letter of Incorporation of the Companies
VI. Detail of Economic Analysis
3 | Page

PC-1 Proforma
List of Abbreviations
Acronyms
Definitions
CBM:
COD:
CCPP:
CPPCL
DISCOs:
DSCR:
EPC:
FEC:
GENCO:
GHCL:
HSD:
HP:
HHV:
IFC:
IDC:
IRR:
kJ/kg
KIBOR:
LP:
LHV:
LIBOR:
MCC:
MMCFD:
MoW&P:
NPV:
NEPRA:
NPPMCL:
Cubic Meter
Commercial Operation Date
Combined Cycle Power Plant
Chenab Power Park Company Limited
Distribution Companies
Debt Services Coverage Ratio
Engineering Procurement & Construction
Foreign Exchange Component
Generation Companies
Generation Holding Company Limited
High Speed Diesel
High pressure
Higher Heating Value
International Finance Corporation
Insurance During Construction
Internal Rate of Return
Kilo Joules/ Kilogram
Karachi Inter Bank Offer Rate
Low Pressure
Low Heating Value
London Inter-Bank Offer Rate
Motor Control Center
Million Cubic Feet per Day
Ministry of Water and Power
Net Present Value
National Electric Power Regularity Authority
National Power Park Management Company Limited
Nitrogenous
Nitrogenous
National Transmission and Dispatch Company
Plant Factor
Re-gasified Liquefied Natural Gas
Ravi Power Park Company Limited
Residual Fuel Oil
Reverse Osmosis
Sui Northern Gas Pipeline Limited
Oxides of Sulfur
Sulfur Dioxide
Tons per Day
NOx:
NTDC:
PLF:
R-LNG
RPPCL:
RFO:
RO:
SNGPL:
SOx:
SO2:
TPD:
4 | Page

PC-1 Proforma
TDH:
WTP:
Ton per Hour

Water Treatment Plant
UNITS
Btu:
Btu/kg:
Kg/kWh:
Kg:
kWh:
kV:
kJ/kg:
m:
MW:
m/h:
m/s:
Sq. Ft:
t/day:
t/hr.:
V:
British Thermal Unit

British Thermal Unit per Kilogram
Kilogram per Kilo Watt Hour
Kilo Gram
Kilo watt Hour
Kilo Volt
Kilo Joules/Kilograms
Meter
Megawatt
Cubic meter per Hour
Meter per Second
Square Feet
Tons per Day
Tons per Hour
Voltage
5 | Page

PC-1 Proforma
GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
PLANNING COMMISSION
PC-1 FORM
(INFRASTRUCTURE SECTORS)
1. Name of
project
2. Location
3. Authorities
Responsible:
i. Sponsoring
ii. Execution
1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined Cycle Gas Power Plant at

Kheshgi District Nowshera.
The site is located at kheshgi District Nowshera
Ministry of Energy and Power, Government of Khyber

Pakhtunkhawa
Kheshgi Energy and power Company limited (KEPCL) under
the umbrella of
EXECUTION MOD
GoP/MOWP
NPPMCL
Gas Supplier
OGRA
02.5PVs
Plant Management
6 | Page

PC-1 Proforma
iii. Operation &

maintenance
iv. Concerned federal

ministry
4. Plan Provision
I.If the project is included
in the medium
term/five year plan,
specify actual
allocation
II. If the project is not
included
in
the
current plan, what
warrants its inclusion
and how is it now
proposed
to
be
accommodated
III. If the project is proposed

to be financed out of
block provision,
indicate,
IV. Provision in the current
year PSDP/ADP
5. Project Objectives:
I. The Objective of the
sector/sub sector,
objective of the
project and linkage
between the
proposed project and
Based on successful experience of operating and

maintaining several Independent Power Producers
(IPPs), CPPCL will outsource the O&M of the power
plant for fifteen (15) years from Commercial
Operation Date (COD) through a separate contract.
Ministry of Water and power, Government of Pakistan
The project is not included in the medium term / five

year plan
The acute energy shortage in the country demand

fast track addition of generation capacity within
shortest possible time. Installation of high efficiency
CCPPs based on R-LNG which can be implemented
within 24 months is the shortest solution to address
the power crises under the given circumstances. As
per the decision of Cabinet Committee on Energy
(CCOE) dated February 12, 2015, (Reference
Government
of
Pakistan,
Cabinet
Division
Memorandum No. F 14/3/20`15), funding for this
project provided through PSDP to avoid excessive
loaning. Accordingly appropriate allocation will be
required to be made in PSDP 2014-15, 2015-16 and
2016-17 and 2017-18.
Not Applicable
Appropriate allocations will be required to be made
in PSDP 2014-15. 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18.
The key objective of the project is follows:
The project is aimed to provide additional power to
the National Grid by using R-LNG in view of the
higher price of the other resources like RFO, HSD etc.
for production of affordable electric power and to
7 | Page

PC-1 Proforma
sectoral objective.
help narrowing the gap in the supply and demand.

The main objective of the Power Generation Policy of
Government of Pakistan are:
To provided adequate power generation capacity
at the least cost.
To encourage and ensure exploitation of imported
LNG for development of thermal power generation
projects in the country.
To encourage the local engineering industry to
form joint ventures with the foreign companies for
the participation in the development
of the power generation projects.
To protect the environment.
The objectives of the project are as under
To achieve energy generation self-sufficiency in
order to support economic growth and reduce
poverty.
To provide affordable electricity to the main load
centers i.e Lahore and Faisalabad through
National Grid.
To reduce the load shedding in the country.
To provide energy security to the country.
Linkage Between proposed project and sectroial
objectives.
Serious infrastructure shortages have emerged

especially in energy, water and communication,
which have raised the cost of doing business,
impeded growth and added to peoples hardship.
The gap between present demand and supply
together with future rise in demand clearly calls
for measure to ensure the continuity of electric
supply to the industrial and domestic consumers
which are playing with pivotal role in countrys
economic uplift. Thus there is a need to install
power plants on war footing basis. There for
MoW&P has planned to install accordingly a 10001200 MW (Gross) power project to secure uninterrupted power at an affordable prices to the
consumers.
II. In case of revised

projects, indicate
objective of the
8 | Page

PC-1 Proforma
project if different
from original PC-1
Not Applicable
6. Description and
justification of
project (enclose
feasibility study
for projects
costing (Rs.300
million and
above)
9 | Page

PC-1 Proforma
10 | P a g e
The CCPP project near Kheshgi Distract Nowshera has

been planned operate on imported LNG which will be
Re-gasified
at the
LNG
terminal
in Karachi.
The gas for
1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined
Cycle
Power
Plant
at Kheshgi
Nowshera
the project will supplied by Sui Northern Gas pipeline
PC-1 Proforma
Company limited (SNGPL)
4.1.
Description of
the project
The objective of power plants is to supply uninterrupted

power supply to all consumers. This plant concept fulfils
the requirement to balance reliable power supply, and
economic operation.
The CCPP is based on a modern highly efficient and well
proven combined gas turbine technology.
A Simplified Conceptual Diagram of Combined Cycle

Power Plant.
NO
DISCRIBTION
Address of the site

with coordinates
Name of nearest
Canal+Canals
Discharge
Type of Canal
Distance of site from
nearest city
3
4
DATA
Kheshgi Distract
Nowshera
N 34 02 45.9
E 71 56 30.1
Kabul River
17 km from
Nowshera city.
NO
DISCRIPTION
DATA
Ambient temprature
( based on
340
EXPECT
ED 11 | P a g e
RANGE
50 to
480

PC-1 Proforma
INTERCONNECTION SHEMES FOR R-LNG BASED POWER

PROJECTS
KPK
12 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
6.1.
Existing
facilities in the
area
The infrastructure facilities required for the project are

already available at site. The land, road link, communication
and community services exist at Kheshgi Distract Nowshera.
6.2.
Justification for
establishment
of project
The installed capacity of power plants in Pakistan is more

than 20,000 MW but dependable is for less on account of derating capacity of thermal power plants and abnormal
variation in hydrology for hydro generation. Currently there
is a peak power shortage of about 5000-6000 MW. The
growth in the electric energy is expected to increase for
many years to come, and by 2030 total demand is expected
to increase to 98000 MW.
The construction of any mega hydropower project, even if
initiated now will take 10 years to come in to operation. This
situation emphasizes the need for speedy installation of
power generation facilities at affordable price and
continuous supply to the industrial sector.
Based on the present power demand and evaluating power
demand forecast in the country, the proposed power plant of
1000-1200 MW will help to fill in the gap between power
demand and supply from 3rd quarter of 2017 when it would
be commissioned and, therefore, the project is justified
6.3.
Technical
parameters i.e.
input and
output of the
project and
technological
aspects of the
project.
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Basic fuel
5.
Back-up fuel
6.
Minimum Net Efficiency (LHV) in
DESCRIPTION
Combined Cycle power
plant at Kheshgi
Distract Nowshera
Type of Gas turbines
Preferred configuration
DATA
1000-1200
MW
(Gross)-ISO
Heavy duty
However final
configuration will be
chosen by
The EPC contractor
natural gas (RLNG)

None
57%-ISO
Combined cycle operation

7.
Single cycle mode operation required,
13 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
With bypass stacks/damper behind GTs

8.
Indoor Installation
9.
Once-through cooling system with water
From adjacent canal plus wet/dry cooling

Tower for 1 month (January) outage
Period of canal per year
10.
The plant shall be complete in all respect
with auxiliaries and Balance of plant

(BoP) and all other facilities required
11.
Potentially, evaporate cooling for GT air intakes
12.
Spare parts for 2 years operation
13.
LTSA from GT-OEM for 48,000 OH (6 Years)
14.
ALS 500 kV switchyard in 1 breaker type
The combined cycle power plant utilizing large sized heavy duty gas turbines
have several advantages and are known for their reliable long term trouble free
operation, high thermal efficiency (over 57%) and are the best choice for base
load operation. The application of large gas turbines in CCPPs results in lowest
possible cost per KWH on NPV basis for 25 year life-time.
The design shall provide maximum levels of reliability and availability,

convenience of operation and maintenance, neat and orderly arrangements,
which shall take into account the functional requirements of various systems
and pleasing physical appearance of the completed power station. The
combined cycle plant shall be designed for base load operation.
6.4 Detail of civil Works, equipment, Machinery and other physical Facilities required for
the project.
A. Civil Works
Civil works for GT foundations

Civil works for HRSG foundations
Civil works for ST turbine foundations
Power house building including workshops, labs and warehouse
Cooling water intake house
14 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
B.
Cooling tower
Water treatment plant, pre-treatment plant, effluent treatment plant
storage tanks
Transformer yard
500 kV switchyard
Plant buildings pump houses and storage sheds
Administration building, security office, parking shed
Pipe rack, cable rack and pipe sleepers
Green belt development
General civil works including residential buildings
Equipment and Machinery
Gas Turbine, Steam Turbine, Generators and Balance of plant:
C.
Heavy Duty Gas Turbines, Generators and Auxiliaries

Heat Recovery Steam Generator with ancillaries
Steam Turbines, generator and ancillaries
Main step up Transformers
Main Auxiliary Transformers
Station Service Transformers
MV/LV Unit & Station Auxiliaries Power Supply System
Protection and control panels
Distributed control system (DCS)
Emergency Diesel Generator
Cooling water systems
Cooling water pump house
Water Treatment Plant
Clarifier plant
Fire Fighting Pump House
Demineralised Water Storage Tank
Clarified Water Storage Tanks
Fire Fighting Water Tanks
Workshops
Spare Parts Store
Fuel Oil Storage Tanks
Gas Booster Compressor (s)
Other Physical Facilities
SCADA System
Telecommunication System including fiber optic cable and satellite links
Security system for all installations
Fire and gas detection and alarm system
Central control room
15 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
D.
Control equipment room

Relay room
Battery room interconnection arrangements
Labs
Warehouse
Residential / Non Residential Buildings
Transportation
Scope of works
The scope of work for the plant comprises but shall not be limited to, the
complete engineering ,supply of drawings, diagrams and other required
information, construction, manufacture, shop testing, packing and marking,
delivery, insurance, transport from shop to site , loading and unloading, storing
at site, checking on completeness, erection, connection to existing equipment
and facilities, functional testing, start-up, commissioning, optimization,
reliability testing, acceptance testing, handing over in satisfactory condition for
commercial operation, training of operation and maintenance personnel during
the warrantee period until acceptance of the complete work of the facility with
auxiliaries, ancillaries and appurtenances so that the plants are completely
ready for commercial operation.
This include as a minimum:
Civil work as required for the project,

Gas turbines and generators
Steam turbines with water cooled condenser,
Once through cooling system fed from canal water and a cooling tower for
backup when canal water is not available during at least one month every
year,
Gas booster compressor station,
Step-up transformer,
Unit and station transformer
Heat recovery steam generators.
Primary fuel system (Re-liquefied Liquid Natural Gas(RLNG)),
Balance of plant equipment ,
Auxiliary systems
Electrical systems
Control and instrumentation systems,
Fire alarm, protection system, and firefighting equipment
Field equipment
Continuous emission monitoring system(CEMS),
Metering and quality monitoring equipment (power and fuel)
Communication facilities,
Closed circuit television (CCTV)system,
16 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
A GPS clock synchronized time system for the common time basis of all
the equipment.
The cost of the above equipment /work is summarized in the project
capital cost estimate include in Annexure III.
6.4.
Governance issues of the sector and Strategy to resolve them

i. Following are the major issues and strategy to resolve them:
ii. Environment impact- This will require mitigation measure to ensure
the pollution free environment. In this regard, the mitigation
measures have been suggested trough environment within NEQs.
iii. Availability of financial resources; Unforeseen factors being first time
activity including land acquisition;
6.5.
DESCRIPTIONOF MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND STRUCTURE
A brief description of major equipment and plant layout id mentioned

hereunder:
VI.6.1 Gas Turbines and Auxiliaries
The gas turbine generator unit shall be of the indoor type for installation in a
machine hall suitable for operating suitable for operation under severe
tropical conditions with extremely high air temperature, humid and highly
corrosive atmosphere.
The unit shall be designed for base load operation with peak load capabilities
to manufacturer practice burning natural gas as main fuel.
Heavy duty gas turbines preferably in a 2xGT + 2Xhrsg + 1xST combined
cycle power plant configuration with a minimum CCPP thermal efficiency of
57% are envisaged.
The GTs will be designed to fire the natural gas having the following analysis.
component
*composition
[mole-%]
Methane (C1)
88.852
Ethane (C2)
5.148
Propane (C3)
0.257
17 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
Butane and heavier (C4+)

Nitrogen (N2)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
0.183
4.815
0.745
* Source : SNGPL
6.6.2 Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSGs)
Fully identical gas turbines are to be equipped with heat recovery steam
generators (HRSG) of the triple pressure type, matching with the heat energy
of exhaust gases from gas turbines. The main features of the HRSG are
described below:
Unfired
Triple pressure reheat system
Horizontal/vertical exhaust gas path
Preferably natural circulation principle
Outdoor installation
The individual major items of which are as follows:
HRSG pressure parts (Drums, Economizers, Evaporators, super heaters,

Re heaters etc).
Steam and Feed water piping system
HP Circulating pumps (in case of forced circulation system)
IP Circulating pumps(in case of forced circulation system)
LP Circulating pumps(in case of forced circulation system)
Safety Valves and Silencers
HRSG and External piping
Steam and Feedwater values
Drains and Vents
Blow Down Equipment
HRSG Steel Structure, Platform, Galleries, Stairs and Lift
Heat Exchanger Chamber
Exhaust system (Ducts, Expansion, Joints, Silencer, Chimney)
Thermal Insulation and Cladding
Control and Monitoring Equipment
For the CCPPs utilizing large heavy duty GTs (300MW capacity), the triple
pressure type HRSGs are an industry standard which only can ensure the
combined cycle efficiencies reaching 60 % and beyond.
6.6.3 Steam turbine (ST) and Auxiliaries
The steam turbine shall be of a standard proven with triple pressure. It shall
be designed for 200,000 operating hours under base load conditions.
Sliding pressure operation with fixed minimum inlet pressure at part load is
18 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
envisaged.
The ST condenser shall be of the two pass type with divided water box and
support on springs.
The steam turbine shall be equipped with a bypass steam reducing stations
dumping steam into the turbine condenser in case of a turbine, generator or
electrical system trip.
The steam turbo set shall be supported by a turbine generator foundation and
pedestal preferable with springs installed on top of the columns.
6.6.4 Generator and Excitation System

The Generator will be capable of continuous safe operation at rated output
and power factor under any of the following conditions for system
compatibility.
Terminal voltage variation of +/- 5% of the rated value.

Frequency variation within 47.5 to 51.5 Hz.
Absolute sum of combined voltage & frequency variation of not beyond
5%.
Additionally, the generators must comply with the NEPRA Grid Code.
The Generator winding will be star connected with the phase & neutral
terminals brought out for connection to isolated phase duct. The star neutral
point will be grounded through a neutral grounding transformer with a resister
in the secondary circuit. The Generator will generally comply with the
requirements specified in IEC 60034.
6.6.5 500Kv Substation
For the power evacuation from the CCPP, an associated 500 kV Switchyard
with its bays arranged in breaker and a half scheme is foreseen. A state of the
art Substation Automation System (SAS) is envisaged for control, protection
and monitoring purpose.
6.6.6 Distributed Control System
The CCPP will be equipped with a state-of-Art Distributed Control System(DCS)
6.6.7 Physical Facilities
The plant layout will be optimally developed for the plant facilities within 100
acres of land at site.
19 | P a g e
S.NO
Non- Qty
Covd Total Rates Cost
Resid (Nos Area Area (sq
(M
1000-2000
MW
(Gross)
Combined
Cycle
Power
Plant
ential )
(sq
(sq
ft)
Rs) at Kheshgi Nowshera
PC-1 Proforma
Buildi
ft)
ft)
Rs
ngs is attached at Annexure-II
Plant layout
1
Ware
1
10000 10000 200 20.0
house
0
0
6.6.8 Residential Building
2
Mechani 1
8000
8000
200 16.0
cal
Work
0 has
0 been provided for construction
An estimated amount of Rs 121.24 million
Shop
of residential
building as detailed below.
3
Electrical 1
3000
3000
200 6.00
Worksho
0
p
S.N Description Qty
Cover Total
Rate/sq Total
4 o Industrial 1
2000 ed 2000area 200
.ft 4.00 (Rs
lab
0
area
(sq.ft) (Rs)
in
5
Chemical 1
2000 (sq.ft)
2000
200 4.00 Milli
Lab
0
on)
6 1 Dispensa
10.0 25.0
Category-II1 5 5000 25005000
1250 200
2000
ry
0
0
0
0
Category-III
2000
7 2 Security
1 151000 150010002250 200
2.00 45.0
0
0
0
3
Category-IV
15
1000
1500 2000
Sub62.0 30.0
0
0
Total
0
4
Category-V 15
606 Add9090
2000
20% for
12.4 18.1
8
electrification & sanitation etc
Sub-total
50
Total74. 101.
Grand Total
4.7 18
20% for Electrification, water supply & sanitation
20.2
4
etc.
4
Grand Total USD Million 0.7
121.
4
Grand Total
Grand
42
1.20
Total USD Million

The residential building will house the permanent staff and the O&M personnel who
will be stationed at the power plant around the clock.
6.6.9 Non-Residential Buildings
An estimated amount of Rs 74.4 million has been provided for Non-Residential
buildings as follows:
6.6.10 Transport An estimated amount of Rs. 87.55 million has been

provided for the purchase and O&M of the following vehicles:
S.N
O
Vehicles
Qty Rate
PKR(Milli
Cost
PKR(Millio
20 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
on)
n)
For Consultant (Project

Execution)
1
Car,4door1300cc
2.0
0
1.90
3.8
4 wheel drive aircondition double

pickups
2.0
0
3.55
7.10
Jeeb 4 wheel
drive 1300 c.c or
greater capacity
2.0
0
2.30
4.6
Sub Total 15.50
For Construction Supervision

1
Car,4door1300cc
2.0
0
1.90
3.60
4 wheel drive air

condition
1.0
0
3.55
3.55
1.0
0
2.30
2.30
Double chain
picksups
3
Jeeb 4 wheel
drive 1300 c.c or
greater engine
capacity
Sub Total 9.45

For O& M of plant
1
Car, 4door 1300

cc
2.0
0
1.90 3.60
Bus
2.0
0
5.20 10.40
Mini Truck
2.0
0
4.00 8.00
Jeeps 4 wheel
driver 1300 cc or
greater engine
2.0
0
2.30 4.60
21 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
capacity
5
Suzuki vans4.00
4.0
0
1.00 4.00
Firefighting
Vehicles
2.0
0
6.00 12.00
Mobil crane 50
ton capacity
1.0
0
15.00 15.00
Ambulance
1.0
0
5.00 5.00
Sub Total 62.60
Grand Total 87.55
Grand Total USD Million 0.87
Vehicles to be purchased for the Consultants and Construction Supervision will

be transferred for O&M of the project after completion.
6.7 Information on sources and availability of cooling water and fuel, calorific
value, heat rate and disposal of ash and effluents
6.7.1 Source and availability of cooling water
The water requirement for the project will be about 900 ft3/s (900 cusec). This
required quantity of raw water will be taken from TS link Canal with maximum
discharge of 11500 Cusec which is running parallel to the project site. The
cooling system will be once through type which means that after pass through
the turbine condenser, the water will be returned to the canal. The allocation of
water has been consented by the irrigation Department. The underground water
is also available for use as make up water. The deep wells also be installed at
the site. These deep wells will be used for the supply of makeup water during
the canal closure period.
The TS link Canal flows in Cusecs are shown in the table below.
Month
TS Link
22 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
Jan-12
FEB-12
Mar-12
Apr-12
May-12
Jun-12
Jul-12
Aug-12
Sep-12
Oct-12
Nov-12
Dec-12
Max
Min
4627
5000
6000
8000
11000
11000
11500
10500
11500
6545
7300
0
0
1364
0
7500
9807
5000
1500
4951
1904
1364
The above table has been based on the daily discharge data of the Canal
provided by the Irrigation Department, Government of Punjab. The Irrigation
Department has verbally confirmed the provision of cooling water from the
canal. However, A formal agreement will be signed between the Irrigation
Department and the company at a later stage.
6.7.2 Fuel i.e. Gas Source, Quality, Quantity and Transportation
SNGPL Is Undertaking two Projects (i.e. Project 1 and Project 2) to receive 1.2
BCFD R-LNG gas. Under Project 1,400 mmSCFD gas shall be transported
downstream Sawan (Starting Point of SNGPL) by laying a 42 dia , 110.6 KM
Pipeline from Sawan to Qadirpur. Under Project 2, Up to 800 BFCD R-LNG supply
shall be transported downstream Sawan for which around 760 KM pipeline
infrastructure of 42-16 dia shall be laid by end June,2017 provided project
financing is arranged in time.
SNGPL will thus be able to supply 200 mmSCFD for the Nowshera Project if the
finance are arranged in time. This issue of the revenue requirements of SNGPL
and SSGC was addressed by the cabinet Committee on Energy (OCCOE) in its
meeting dated February 12, 2015 and is recorded in Government of Pakistan,
Cabinet Division Memorandum No F.14/3/2015-com dated February 16,2015case No. cc-15/3/2015.
AS SNGPL will not be able to supply the gas to Nowshera Project at the requisite
pressure of >40 Bars, a gas booster compressor station will be made part of the
scope of work of power plant EPC contract.
Reference Gas Composition provided by SNGPL.
S
N
o
COMPONENT
COMPOSTION
(Mole %)
Methane (c1)
Ethane(C2)
88.852
5.148
23 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
Propane (C3)
0.257
Butane and heavier

(C4+)
0.183
Nitrogen (N2)
4.815
Carbon Dioxide
(CO2)
0.745
6.7.3 Comparison/ Analysis of available technology and rationale / criteria for

selection of specified technology
Pakistan having abundance of hydro resources for power generation of more
than 45,000 mw and at present is not in a position to launch a mega hydro
project due to miscellaneous reason; lack of consensus among the provinces
and financial constraints in the exchequer. The constraints of any big dam even
if initiated now will take 10 years to come into operation. Renewable energy like
solar and wind are not only costly but cant meet the base load requirements of
the industry due to unreliable generation. Major countries in the world relay on
hydro coal and gas to meet the base load requirement. Therefore, the only
available option is use of fossils fuel (coal, gas and oil) for power generation to
meet energy shortage in short span of time. coal and natural gas are two
dominating fossil fuels for electricity generation worldwide .coal accounts for
more than 40%power generation worldwide while natural gas share is around
25%and accounts for about 6% of the total world electricity generation (reliance
is based on energy information administration-USA).
The electricity generation on natural gas is the best option in Pakistan. However
due to shortage of gas ,the imported LNG under the present scenario is the best
and most favorable option for power generation .cost of electricity generation
through R-LNG power plant is also much cheaper than imported oil. NEPRA is
already in the process of notifying the upfront tariff for R-LNG based power
plants that is reasonably favorable for attracting the investment.
6.7.4 Maintenance facilities
The contractor shall develop an in house facility for scheduled maintenance,
forced outage and emergency maintenance. Mechanical, electrical. I&C
workshops, chemical and industrial labs shall be developed too.
The tools &plants required for chemical laboratory, electrical and electronics
instruments for electrical laboratory and the work shop equipment and
accessories as required will be identified and will be supplied to the plant by
EPC contractor. The major T&P of the work shop is mechanical equipment listed
here under.
Universal grinding machine

24 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
Central lathe machine
Universal drilling machine
Milling machine
metal cutting hacksaw
thread cutting machine

electric welding sets
6.7.5 Transmission and distribution system

The 1000-1200 MW R-LNG based CCPPwill be interconnected to;
A 500 KV/DC T/LINE, APPROX.3 KM long, for IN /OUT of the existing

Muzaffargrh gatti 500 KV/s/c T/LINE at H.B.SHAH POWER PROJECT.
A 500 KV D/C T/LINE APPROX .25 KM LONG, FOR IN/OUT OF THE EXISTING
MULTAN GALTI 500 KV S/C T/LINE AT H.B SHAH POWER PLANT.
6.7.6 Load flow studies

LOAD FLOW STUDIED HAVE BEEN CONDUCTED BY NTDC / PLANNING FOR
OPTIMUM INTERCONNECTION SCHEME;HAVE CONFIRMED DISPERSING UP TO
1200 MW (GROSS)FROM POWER PLANT TO EXISTTING 500 KV SYSTEM.A GRID
INTERCONNECTION STUDY REPORT PREPARED BY PLANNING (POWER)
DEPARTEMENT OF NTDCL IS ATTACHED IN THE PRE FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT
PROVIDED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
7 Capital Cost Estimate
The total project cost has been estimated at Eq.USD 839.83 Million i.e. PKR
84823.14 Million at reference exchange rate of 1 USD=101 PKR
The detail estimate project cost estimate is attached at Annexure-11
7.1 Date of Estimation of the project cost
The cost estimation has been prepared at the price level of March, 2015
7.2Basis of determining the capital cost
The rates for the estimate are based on in-house cost data for similar capacity
project in the sub-continent and compared with the budgetary price the land,
site development and civil cost estimate have based on the prevailing rates in
the region
7.3 Year Wise Estimation of Physical Activates
25 | P a g e
Years
Physical Activities
1000-2000 MW st(Gross) Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kheshgi Nowshera

1 Year
Pre-Qualification of Contractors
PC-1 Proforma
Power unit
Outpu
t
Rated
Capacity
Load Factor
No.of
months
in
commercial
operation
Gross
generation
Auxiliary
consumptio
n
Net sent
out
power
(201415)
Yr 1
MW
Tender Document Preparation

Invitation
of Bids
Yr
2
Yr 3
Yr 4
Yr 5
Submission of bid & bid Evaluation
Contract Award and Notice to Proceed

/
n
120 Handover
120 1200
site 1200 1200
0 Basic
0 Engineering
nd
2%
Year60% 60% 60% 60%
60%
Finalize Basic Engineering
(2015- 12
mont
12
12
12
Finalize Plant Layout 12
16)
hs
Detailed Engineering
Procurement
Civil Works
Supply
+Contract
Gwh
630.Mechanical
630. 630.BOP
630.7
630.7
72 Electrical
72
72Supply
2 Contract
2
C
&
I
Supply
Contract
%
2.6
2.6
2.6% 2.6% 2.6%
3rd year% Delivery
Completion of GT, HRSG and
%
(2016Steam Turbine packages up to site
17)
Gwh.
614 614 6143 6143. 6143.
of Gas Turbine
3.2 Successful
3.2
.2 Synchronization
2
2
Erection of HRSGs Unite 1&2
Erection of Steam Turbine Generator
7.4. YearWise
Compone
t Wise
Financial
Phasing
8.
Annual
Completion of Hydro Test 1st & 2nd HRSGs

Successful synchronization of steam Turbine
Generator
CCPP Ready for commercial operation
4th Year
(2017Total Cost
18) (Eq.USD
Year
Year-1
Year-2
Year-3
Year-4
Total
Million)
12.5975
335.9332
335.9332
155.3691
839.833
Total Cost (Eq

PkR Million*)
1272.347 (Seed
Money)
33929.25
33929.25
15692.28
84823.14
operating Cost based on

proposed capacity
utilization and source of
financing:
26 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
Variable Cost
Fuel (R-LNG) Cost *
in PKR/Kwh
Annual Fuel (R-LNG)
Cost (in PKR Billion)
O&M Expenses (in

PKR / KWh)
Annual O&M
Expenses (in PKR
Million)
Total Variable Cost
(Fuel
+O&M) (in Eq.PKR
billion
Total Variable Cost
(Fuel
+O&M) (in Eq.USD
Million)*
Yr
1
6.0
46
38.
13
3
Yr
2
6.0
46
38.
13
3
0.2
76
17
40.
8
39.
87
4
39
4.8
Yr
Yr 4
Yr 5
3
6.046
6.04
6
38.1
33
6.046
38.13
3
38.133
0.2
76
17
40.
8
39.
87
4
0.276
0.276
1740.
8
1740.8
39.87
4
39.874
39.8
74
39
4.8
394.8
394.8
394.
8
0.27
6
1740
.8
*based on assumed R-LNG

price of USD 10/MMBtu and
Exchange rate 1 USD = 101
PKR
Source of financing
The O&M Cost will be met

through the Tariff approved by
NEPRA
27 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
9. Demand
and supply
analysis
9.1 Existing
capacity of
services and
supply/
demand
Existing Installed Capacity & Capability of X-WAPDA DISCOs System

sr.n
o
Public Sector
Hydro
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Mangla
Ghazi barotha
Warsak
Chasma Low Head
Allal Khwar HPP
Jinnah Low Head
Small Hydels
Khan Khawar HPP
Dubair Khwar
Fuel*
W
W
W
RFO/FD/G
W
W
W
W
W
Sub-Total (Wapda Hydel)
Derated
capacity/capabili
ty (MW)
Capability (MW)
with planned
outages
capability (MW)
with forced
outages
capability with gas

unavailablity
summ
er
wint
er
summ
er
wint
er
summ
er
wint
er
summ
er
winter
1000
1450
243
184
121
96
128
72
130
960
1357
200
157
121
96
81
72
130
350
794
139
67
60
40
26
15
65
960
1357
200
157
121
96
81
72
130
350
794
139
67
60
40
26
15
65
960
1357
200
157
121
96
81
72
130
350
794
139
67
60
40
26
15
65
960
1357
200
157
121
96
81
72
130
350
794
139
67
60
40
26
15
65
6902
6807
2385
6807
2385
6807
2385
6807
2385
11
TPS jamshore #1-4
Gas/Fo/RF
850
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
12
GTPS Kotri #1-7

Sub-Total Genco-1
TPS Guddu Steam #1-4
TPS Guddu CC#5-13
Guddu 747 CC
TPS Quetta
Sub-Total Genco-11
TPS Muzzaffargarh#1-6
GAs/HSD
174
1024
640
1015
747
35
1927
1350
140
840
270
885
747
25
1927
1130
140
840
270
885
747
25
1927
1130
140
840
270
885
747
25
1927
1130
140
840
270
885
747
25
1927
1130
140
840
270
885
747
25
1927
1130
140
840
270
885
747
25
1927
1130
140
840
270
885
747
25
1927
1130
140
840
270
885
747
25
1927
1130
195
244
132
44
95
2060
150
150
5671
60
210
100
30
95
1625
30
30
4422
60
210
100
30
95
1530
30
30
4327
60
210
100
30
95
1530
30
30
4327
60
210
100
30
95
1530
30
30
4327
60
210
100
30
95
1530
30
30
4327
60
210
100
30
95
1530
30
30
4327
60
210
100
30
95
1530
30
30
4327
60
210
100
30
95
1530
30
30
4327
325
340
300
315
287
301
271
285
251
263
235
247
251
263
235
247
665
615
587
556
514
482
514
482
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Private Sector
Name of power station
Install
ed
capaci
ty
(MW)
NGPS Multan#1&2
GTPS faislabad#1-9
SPS Faislabad#1&2
Shahdara GT
Nandipur
Sub-Total Genco-111
FBC Lakhra
Sub-Total Genco-IV
Sub Total Gencos
Gas/FO
G
G
G
2437
RFO/FD/G
Gas/RFO/HS
D
GAs/HSD
FD/Gas/RF
C
R
C
N
24
25
Chasma (PEAC)-1
Chasma (PEAC)-11
Uranium
Uranium
Sub-Total (Nuclear)
H
26
Jagran Hydel
30
30
10
30
10
30
10
30
10
27
Malakand-111 Hydel
81
81
20
81
20
81
20
81
20
28
New Bong escape
84
84
34
84
34
84
34
84
34
195
195
Ther
64
195
64
195
64
195
64
1638
1292
131
362
365
135
1345
1205
124
350
350
110
1324
1145
118
334
334
114
1253
1085
112
316
316
108
1240
1074
111
313
313
107
1170
1013
105
295
295
100
1240
1074
111
313
313
107
1170
1013
105
295
295
100
Sub-Total (Hydel IPPS)

29
30
31
32
33
34
KAPCO
Hub Power Project (HUBCO)
Kohinoor Energy Ltd.(KEL)
Aps Laipir Ltd.
AES Pak Gen (Pvt)
SEPCOL
RFO/Gas/H
R
R
R
R
R
28 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
Habibullah Energy Ltd

Uch Power Project
Rausch (Pak) Power Ltd.
Fauji kabirwala (FKPCL)
Saba Power Company
Japan Power Generation Ltd
Liberty Power Project
G
G
G
G
R
R
G
140
586
450
157
134
135
235
131
551
399
151
126
107
212
123
526
377
144
119
115
202
117
498
357
137
113
108
191
115
493
354
195
112
107
189
109
465
333
127
106
101
178
115
493
354
195
112
107
189
109
465
333
127
106
101
178
42
Altern Energy Ltd.(ABL)
31
29
30
28
28
26
28
26
43
44
Attock Generation PP
ATLAS Power
R
R
163
219
156
214
149
209
141
198
140
196
132
185
140
196
132
185
45
Engro p.p,Daharki,Sindh
HSD/Gas/F
226
214
207
196
194
183
194
183
46
Salf P.P Sahiwal,Punjab
Gas/HSD
225
205
215
203
201
190
201
190
47
Orient P.P,Ballold,Punjab
Gas/HSD
225
213
215
203
201
190
201
190
48
49
Nishat P.P,Near Lahore

Nishat Proj Lahore
R
R
200
200
195
196
191
191
181
181
179
179
159
169
179
179
159
169
50
51
Foundation Power
Saphire Hurdlke
G
Gas/HSD
174
225
172
212
167
200
158
189
157
187
148
176
157
187
148
176
52
53
Liberty Toch
Hubco Narewal
200
220
196
214
187
204
177
193
175
192
165
181
175
192
165
181
54
Haripur Bhikki
225
199
200
189
187
176
187
176
55
Uch -11
375
375
159
159
159
159
159
159
56
57
Davis
JDW-11
Sub- Total thermal IPPs
10
74
8702
10
24
7510
10
24
7118
10
24
7049
10
24
6657
10
24
7049
10
24
5598
58
fauji wind power
50
10
24
7981
Wind Power
45
17
45
17
45
17
45
17
59
Zertu energy wind power

Sub-total wind power plant
Total wind power plants
56
106
106
48
93
93
48
93
93
48
93
93
18
35
35
15038
7097
13018
7092
11889
7002
10707
2449
Total (X-WAPDA DISCOs System)
22241
20113
18
35
35
1146
6
2449
1395
0
48
93
93
Total thermal (public+private)

Total Hydel (public+private)
18
35
35
1200
1
2449
1448
5
18984
13191
18
35
35
2449
1550
2
12424
7002
19519
11889
7002
18984
Source: Expansion Plan of NTDC 2011-2030 (website)
9.2 Project
demand for
10 years and
supplydemand gap
The growth in electric energy use in Pakistan is expected to

remain high for many years to come, and by 2030, total demand is
expected to increase by factors of between 4.96 to 5.80 times
over the present year 2014-15 level i.e. 28423 MW. This implies
average annual growth rates of between 4.96 and 5.80 of the low
and high scenarios of demand respectively (date received from
NTDC).
Years
Supply
Demand
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
22,377
24,570
27,796
26,225
28,423
31,018
Surplus/D
eficit
-3848
-3853
-3222
29 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
2016-17
37,540
33,750
3790
2017-18 44,068
36,728
7340
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
2022-23
40,149
43,867
47,879
52,147
56,665
7051
6501
5098
2764
429
47,200
50,368
52,977
54,911
57,094
30 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
2023-24 60,378
61,424
-1046
Source: Expansion plan of NTDC 2011-2030 (website)
31 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
Summary of Generation Addition
9.3
Sr
Fiscal
Name of Project
Agency
Capac
#
Year
ity of
Existing capacity
2014the
15
Foundation wind Energy-2
AEDS
projec 12
Nandipur (Remaning Unite)
GENCO
3
Quaid-e-Azam solar Park PhasePPDB
ts
1
4
Foundation wind Energy-1
AEDB
being
5
Three Gorges Wind Fam
AEDB
imple
6
Other Wind Power Plants
AEDB
ment
7
Quid-e-Azam Solar Park Phase-2
PPDB
ed in /
201516
8
Wind Power Plants
AEDS
privat
9
CHASNUPP-III-Punjab
PAEC
e
10
Quid-e-Azam Solar Park Phase-3
PPDB
sector
2016-
Fuel
Location
Capacit
y (MW)
Commissionin
g date
Wind
RFO
Solar
Gharo, Sindh
Gujranwala
Lal sohnra (Cholistan)
50
330
100
Oct-2014
Dec-2014
Dec-2014
Wind
Wind
Gharo, Sindh
Jhampir, Sindh
50
50
Jan-2015
Jan-2015
Wind
Jhampir/Gharo/BhamboreSi
ndh
330
Jan-2015
Solar
Laal Sohnra
(Cholistan),Punjab
300
Jan-2015
Wind
Nucl
Solar
Jhampir/Ghare/BhambareSi
ndh
Chashma KPK
Lal sohnra (Cholistan)
650
Apr-2016
340
600
March-2016
Jan-2016
520
Nov-2016
Addition/
Year
(MW)
Total Installed Capac
1210
22241
23451
1590
25041
4975
30016
8802
38818
4090
42908
6660
49768
8300
58068
17
11
Wind Power Plants
AEDB
Wind
12
Neelum Jhelum Hydel
WAPDA
Hydel
Jhampir/Ghare/Bhambare
Sindh
Nauseri/Muzaffarabad,AjK
969
Nov-2016
13
Coal Plant at Sahiwal
PPDB
Coal
Sahiwal,Punjab
1320
Nov-2016
14
Grange Helding
PPIB
Oil
Arif wala Punjab
163
Dec-2016
15
16
Golen Gol HPP

CHASNUPP-IV-Punjab
WAPDA
PAEC
Hydel
Nucl
Chitral,KPK
Chashma KPK
106
340
Dec-2016
Dec-2016
17
Tarbela 4th Ext.Hydro
WAPDA
Hydel
Tarbela, KPk
1410
Mar-2017
Patrind HPP
PPIB
Hayde
l
Kunhar River,KPK,AJK
145
Apr-2017
18
201718
19
20
Keyal Khwar
Pakistan Power Park at Gaddani
WAPDA
PPIB
Hydel
Coal
Dasu,District KPK
Pakistan Power
Park,Gadani,Balochistan
122
3960
Oct-2017
Dec-2017
21
22
Engro Ther Coal

Port Qasim PP
PPIB
PPIB
Coal
Coal
Engro Ther Coal

Thar,Sindh
660
1320
Dec-2017
Dec-2017
23
24
GulPur Ponch River

Coal plant at Muzzafargarh
PPIB
PPDB
Hydal
Coal
Port Qasim, Karachi

Muzaffargarh,Punjab
100
1320
Dec-2017
Jun-2018
Coal Plant at R.Y Khan
PPDB
Coal
R.Y.Khan,Punjab
1320
Jun-2018
TPS Jamashoro (Unit Add)

Phase-2
Sehra HPP
GENCO
s
PPIB
Coal
Jamashoro, Sindh
660
Sep-2018
Hydel
Ponch, River,AJK
130
Dec-2018
28
Pakistan Power Park Gaddani

(remaining 4 unit)
PPIB
Coal
Pakistan Power
Park,Gadani,Balochistan
2640
Dec-2018
29
TPS Jamashoro (Unit Add,)

Phase-2
GENCO
s
Coal
Jamashoro, Sindh
660
Mar-2019
30
Casa
GOP
Imp
1000
Jul-2019
31
Tarbela 5th ext. Hydro
WAPDA
Hydel
Cross Border
Interconnection
Tarbela ,KPK
1320
Jul-2019
32
Phandar Hydro
WAPDA
Hydel
80
May-2019
33
Karot HPP
PPIB
Hydel
720
Jun-2020
34
Azad Pattan HPP
PPIB
Hydel
On Ghizer River,Gilgit
Baltistan
Jehlum River,Distt
Rawalpindi Punjab
Jehlum River/Sudhnold,AJK
640
Jun-2020
35
Suki Kinari
PPIB
Hydel
840
Jun-2020
36
Kotli
PPIB
Hydel
Kunhar
River/Mansehra,KPK
Ponch, River/Kotli,AJK
100
Jun-2020
37
Dasu-1
WAPDA
Hydel
7Km Upstream of Dasu

Village on Indus River
2160
Jun-2020
25
201819
26
27
201920
202021
38
Karachi Coastal Power Plant

unit-1
Kohala
Chakothi-
PAEC
Nuci
Karachi Sindh
1100
Aug-2020
39
40
PPIB
PPIB
Hydel
Hydel
1100
500
Dec-2020
Dec-2020
41
Diameter Basha
WAPDA
Hydel
Jehlum River/Kohala AJK

River Jehlum, Distt
Hattian,AJK
Diameter Basha
4500
Jun-2021
PAEC
Nuci
Karachi,Sindh
1100
Jun-2021
42
Karachi Coastal Power Plant

unit-2
Total Generation Addition
Reference:
(JKHEB,PEDO,PPIB,AEDB,PPOB AND AEC
Information)
42687
32 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
Jun-20121
9.4 Designed
capacity and
output of the
proposed
project
10: Financial
Plan
Thermal modelling has been under taken to provide indicative

output and
Performance of the 1169 MW (net) plant. The gross capacity of the
CCPP is
1200 MW. With the auxiliary power consumption of 2.6% the
net capacity of The unit is therefore 1169MW.
Source of Financing
For the execution of projects, as per the decision of CCOE,
100 % funding will be provided through PSDP, to avoid
excessive loaning. Accordingly appropriate allocations will
be required to be made in PSDP 2014-15,2015-16 and 201617 and 2017-18
11: Benefits
of the
Project And
Analysis
11.1 Financial
Not applicable
11.2 Economic
Benefit to the economy along with assumptions:
11.3 Social
Benefit with indicators:

The project will have many direct and indirect socioeconomic benefits namely rapid industrial growth in the
industrial estates, enhanced industrial production to boost
export, more foreign exchanges for the country and new
jobs for unskilled and skilled personnel during construction
and operating phases etc.
The overall energy cost gas fired power plant is cheaper
than that of oil fired energy cost. The cheaper energy shall
benefit the industry as its cost of production will go down
which is an important factor in present, day circumstances
where a lot of competition exists. The exportable items will
be
Able to compete in international market and earn precious
foreign exchange for the country.
Sustained industrial
activities shall produce reliable employment opportunities in
the area and benefiting the masses.
33 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
11.4
Environme
ntal Impact
assessment
The project primarily falls within area of kot kamian and is

located on the left bank of Trimmu-Sidhnai Link Canal. The
proposed site is accessible through Bhakkar Jhang Road. In
Project Area several tube wells are installed that operates
on Peter Engines to provide irrigation water; Land is mostly
agriculture with sparse buildup structures. The nearby
villages are Doi
Muhammad, Basti Korawala, Basti Rasheed Wala Kot Kamia.
Air Quality of project and Study Area is Visually
fine.Groundwater in the Study
Area mostly being used as a main source of irrigation and
drinking through tube wells and hand pumps. The surface
water body in the Study Area is Trimmu-Sidhnai Link Canal
and Haveli Main Line (HML) that runs parallel to each other
and both originates from Trimmu-Barrage.The Quality of
surface water in the vicinity of project area is visually fine.
The Overall environmental Impacts of Regasified Liquefied
Natural Gas (RLNG) based Thermal Power Plant is as low as
RLNG is environmental friendly. The project has several
positive Impacts such as employment Opportunities,
Increased Accessibility, and increase in Business etc.
However, the negative Impacts of project can be the
conversion of agriculture land into the built up area and
acquisition of private land, Impact on trees, Impact on
water, resources and other construction and operation
related Impacts
The environmental Impact of project are being assessed
through an Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) which is
in progress. The EIA will be got approved from
Environmental protection Agency (EPA) before starting the
implementation of the Project.
34 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
35 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
11.5 Financial
Analysis
11.6 Economic
Analysis
Not Applicable
Economic Parameters
Present worth of HSFO
based Combined Cycle
power plant Costs (Million
US$)-without project
Present Worth of R-LNG
based power plant
Costs(Million US$)-with
project Net Present Value
(Million US$)
B/C Ratio
EIRR (%)
Result at 12 % Discount
Rate
3750.04
2620.90
1129.14
1.43:1
51.71
Detailed Economic Analysis of project is attached at

Annexure-VI
11.7 Employment
Analysis
Description
S.N
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
11.8 Sensitivity
analysis
Professional &
Technical
Administrative
Executive and
managerial
Clerical
Services
Skilled
Unskilled
Others
Total
Description
Base Case*
Sensitivity Analysis
i)10 percent increase in
proposed power plant
costs
ii)10 percent decrease in
HSFO based combined
cycle power plant costs
iii) 20 percent increase in
proposed power plant
costs
For Execution
NO
Month
4
33
33
2
2
3
5
7
23
33
33
33
33
EIRR (%)
51.71
37.69
36.43
27.75
36 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
*Comparison between Equivalent HSFO based combined

cycle power plant and proposed Power Plant
Detail are attached as Annexure-VI
37 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
12 a)
Implementatio
n schedule
Considering Implementation of the project through a single

Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) contract
the implementation arrangement, financing and O & M after
COD of the CCPP will be 27 months
Date of starting of the project = Date of notice to proceed
Date of completion of the project = 27 Months from the
notice to proceed.
12 b) Result
based
monitoring
(RBM)
Indicators
Result Based Monitoring Framework Indicators have been

provided in the Table below:
Outcome
Targeted
Baselin
Target
Input
Out put
Impact
e
after
Indicat Completion
or
of Project
Eq.PKR
R-LNG
Annual
Energy
Increase in
84823.1 based CCPP Energy
production
overall
4M
at
generati as 6307 GHw economic
Kheshgi,Dist on as
per Annum,
indicators
rict
6307
an addition
including
Nowshera
GWh
in the
GDP etc.
will have
existing
installed
capacity
gross
generation
capacity of
1200 MW.
13.
Manageme
nt
structure
and
manpower
requiremen
t
CEO
NPPMCL
COO
CPPCL
Chief
Technical
officer
Technical
Experts/Engin
eer
Director(Lega
l)
Legal Officers
Director
(Finance)
Finacial/Acco
unts officers
The BoD of the Company will approve the

38 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
13.1.
Administra
tive
arrangeme
nt for
implement
ation of
project
13.2.
Manpower
Requireme
nts
13.3. Job
descriptio
n
qualificati
on,
experience
, age and
salary of
each post
management Structure and Man-power requirements.

All officers shall have support staff
SPV formed to undertake the Project will be structured in a

manner to ensure fast track execution of the project. There
will be project steering committee with board based
representation Ministry of Water and Power will also
establish a project monitoring unit.
Exact requirement will be determined by the board of

directors of the company in due course of time.
Detailed JDs/ToRs will be developed and approved by the

board of directors of the company in due course of time. The
staff will be hired both from public and private sectors
through a transparent and competitive process.
39 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
15. Certified that the Project proposal has been prepared on the Basis of
instruction provided by the Planning Commission for the Preparation of Pc-1 for
Infrastructure Sector Project.
i.
Prepared By
NESPAK
GENERAL MANAGER
National Engineering
Services
Pakistan Ltd.
ii.
Reviewed By
(------------------)
Chief Technical Officer
CPPCL
iii.
Counted Checked By
iv.
Final Reviewed By
(-----------------)
Chief Executive Officer
v.
Recommended By
(-----------------)
Secretary (MoW&P)
Government of Pakistan.
(------------------)
Chief Operating Officer
40 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
41 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
42 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
GAS TURBINE HALL
H.R.S.G
STEAM TURBINE HALL
CENTRAL CONTROLE BUILDING
GAS CONDITIONING SKID
500KV OUTDOOR SWITCHYARD
500KV SWITCHYARD CONTROL BUILDING
STEAM TURBINE MAIN TRANSFORMER
GAS TURBINE MAIN TRANSFORMER
10
STATION AUX TRANSFORMER
11
AIR COMPRESSER BUILDING
12
EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING
13
CIRCULATING WATER PUMP HOUSE
14
MECHANICAL DRAFT COOLING TOWER
15
RAW WATER TREATMENTE PLANT
16
FIRE PUMP HOUSE
17
DM WATER TANK
18
CLARIFIER
19
FIRE FIGHTING WATER TANK
20
CLARIFIER
21
RAIN WATER PUMP HOUSE
22
SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
23
LINE DOSING EQUIPMENT
24
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
25
CHEMICAL LAB
26
WATER TREATMENT PLANT AREA
27
PURIFIED WATER PIT
28
SLUDGE ENRIGHTMENT TANK
29
ONCE THROUGH COOLING WATER P.H
30
CHEMICAL AUXULARY BUILDING
31
WATER STORAGE POND
32
ACID AND ALKALI STORAGE AREA
33
AUXULARY BOILER HOUSE
34
HYDROGEN GENERATION PLANT
35
GAS BOOSTER COMPRESSOR STATION
36
AREA ALLOCATED FOR SNGPL STATION
37
NO REGULATED STATION
38
VENT
39
NG REGULATING STATION CONTROL ROOM
40
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
41
WORKSHOP
42
STORE
43 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
S.
N.
1
2
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
Cost elements
Land Cost (150 acres x PKR 1 M / Acre

Land Development including Security
Fence / Boundary Wall etc.
EPC Cost including Design, supply,
Installation, Testing & Commissioning
of CCPP (Sum of items 3.1-3.9)*
Gas Turbine & Generator
Heat Recovery Steam Generator
Steam Turbine & Generator
Power Transformers
500 kv Switchyard
Cooling Water System
Gas Booster Compressor Station
Balance of Plant (BoP)
Civil Works
Customs Duty(5 % of the items 3.1-3.9
Mandatory Space Parts @ 3 % of items
3.1-3.9
Insurance during Construction (1% of
EPC cost)
Preoperative expenses including
security, communications,
administration and management costs
of the Client during project execution
@ 3% of EPC cost **
Estimat
ed
Foreign
Curren
cy
Compo
nent
(USD
million
s)
0
Estima
ted
Local
Curren
cy
Compo
nent
(PKR
million
s)
150
Total
Estimate
d Cost
(Eq. USD
Million)
Total
Estimate
d Cost
(Eq PKR
Million)
1.49
150
100
0.99
100
637
6363
700
707000
210
112
140
14
21
10.5
17.5
112
0
31.85
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6363
0
210
112
140
14
21
10.5
17.5
112
63
31.85
21210
11312
14140
1414
2121
1060.5
1767.5
11312
6363
3216.85
19.11
19.11
1930.11
6.37
63.63
707
1414
14
1414
2121
21
2121
0.05
17.36
255.42
19.89
2008.6
21.35
314.16
10786.
21
24.46
2470.58
84823.1
4
Technical, legal and financial

consultancy services cost during
project execution @ 3% of EPC cost***
Licensing Fee
Financing fees and charges @ 2.5 % of
the item 1-9
Contingency*** ( 3% of items 1-10)
Project Cost before IDC (sum of items
1-11)
Specific Project Cost before IDC
(Million USD/ MW)
733.04
839.83
0.7
14
Interest During Construction****
15
Total Project Capital Cost including IDC
733.04
10786.
21
839.83
84823.1
4
16
Specific Project Capital Cost (Million

USD/MW)
0.7
44 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
S NO
**
***
****
Cost ele
Cost
elements
ments
Estimated
Estimated
Total
Total
Foreign
Local
Estimated
Estimated
Currency
Currency
Cost (Eq.
Cost (Eq
Component Component
USD
PKR Million)
(USD
(PKR
Million)
millions)
millions)
Total EPC Cost and its breakdown is based on Gas Turbine World
Handbook 2013, budgetary quotations received from OEMs and
Consultants past experience on working on similar projects e.g.
747 MW CCPP Guddu etc.
The consultancy services cost covers the expenses of the local /
expatriate technical, legal and financial consultants during all
phases of the project and is based on experience on similar
projects.
Provision of contingencies is to meet unforeseen requirements
during execution of the project.
The Project will be financed through PSDP
45 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE

LIMITED
GAS HOUSE , 21 KASHMIR ROAD, P O BOX 56 LAHORE
Ref; CP & D/02-6906

Date; March 03, 2015
Mr. Shahid Mahmood,
General Manager / Project Manager,
National Engineering Services Pakistan (Pvt ) Ltd.
NESPAK House, I C, Block-N
Model Town Extension
Lahore
RLNG BASED POWER PLANTS IN PUNJAB AT BHIKKI, BALLOKI AND HAVELI
BAHADUR
SHAH-GAS PRESSURE AND COMPOSITION
Dear Sir,
This refer s to you letter No. SA-307/165/SM/01/8233 dated 26.02.2015 on the

subject cited above. The desired information is as under:
1-
Pressure at which 200 MMCFD gas will be made available to Power Plants:
Sr.
N
o
123-
Plant Location
Bhikki, District
Sheikhupura
Balloki, District Kasur
Haveli Bahadur shah,
District Jhang
Delivery
Pressures
(PSIG)
300-400
300-400
500-700
Remarks
Pressure at
vary due to
consumption
power plants
consumption
system.
these locations may

the variation in gas
as location of these
is close to major gas
hubs
on
SNGPL
2- GAS COMPOSITION: RLNG shall be fed to our system from southern side at Sawan (SNGPLs
system starting point) and transported to downstream of Swan along with existing southern
sources gases. Therefore, gas composition has been determined by comingling the RLNG
composition with southern sources gases and shall be dependent upon Qatar Gas Source from
where at present RLNG is being purchased. Net composition may change if RLNG is purchased
from source other than Qatar Gas / spot purchase.
Component
Units
RLNG
Methane (Cl)
Mole
Percent
Mole
Percent
Mole
90.15
Ethane (C2)
Propane (C3)
Composition
Southern
Commingled Gas
System Gas
87.02
88.852 +5%
1.122
5.148 +5%
0.25
0.266
0.257 +5%
46 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
Butane and heavier
(C4+)
Nitrogen (N2)
Carbon Dioxide
Grass Calorific Value
Percent
Mole
Percent
Mole
Percent
Mole
Percent
Btu/Scf
0.1
0.3
0.183
+5%
1.5
9.496
4.185
+5%
1.797
0.745
+5%
1050
916.356
950 to 1000
SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE

LIMITED
GAS HOUSE , 21 KASHMIR ROAD, P O BOX 56 LAHORE
We hope above information shall fulfill yours requirements.
Regards,
Yours
sincerely,
SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES
LTD
(Ali Hussain
Qureshi)
Manager (T)
Cc:
Cc:
Cc:
Cc:
DMD (Ops)
SGM (ES)
GM (Ops)
GM (P&D)
Sr. General
For MANAGING
DIRECTOR
47 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
48 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
R-LNG
Based
Power
Plant
Economic Analysis
1. GENERAL
46
2. METHODOLOGY
46
3. PARAMETERS FOR ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
46
3.1.1. Price Datum
46
49 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
3.1.2. Exchange Rate
47
3.1.3. Discount Rate
47
3.1.4. Salvage Value
47
3.1.5. Energy Generation
47
4. ECONAMIC ANALYSIS
47
4.1. COSTS UNDER WITHOUT & WITH PROJECT
47
4.1.1. Costs of Equivalent HSFO Based Combined Cycle Power

Facility
48
4.1.1.1. Capital Cost of Equivalent HSFO based Combined cycle

Power Facility
48
4.1.1.2. Recurrent Costs of Equivalent HSFO based Combined Cycle

Power facility
49
4.1.1.3. Annual Stream of Costs
50
4.1.2. Costs of R-LNG based Combined cycle Power Plant
50
4.1.2.1. Capital Costs
50
4.1.2.2. Recurrent Costs
50
4.1.2.3. Fuel costs
51
4.1.2.4. Annual Stream of costs
51
4.2. COST SAVINGS/BENEFITS DUE TO PROPOSED PROJECT
51
5. RESULTS OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
51
5.1. SENSITIVITY / RISK ANALYSIS
51
6. RECOMMENDATION
52
R-LNG Based Power Plant

ECONAMIC ANALYSIS OF 1000-1200 MW (GROSS) RE-GASIFIED LIQUEFIED
NATURAL GAS (RLNG) BASED COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANT AT KHESHGI
DISTRICT NOWSHERA PAKISTAN
1. GENERAL
50 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
This chapter presents the economic analysis of R-LNG based combined cycle
power plant project at Kheshgi district Nowshera. The purpose of the study is to
assess the economic viability of the project and to determine the return to the
economy as a whole
2. METHODOLOGY
Economic justification of the project has been established by showing its
profitability in terms of excess of benefits to the economy over economic costs
by using the discounted cash flow technique. The projected stream of project
benefits (arising out of project implementation) over the economic life of the
project has been compared to the estimated stream of economic costs by
bringing the two to a uniform basis through the process of discounting. The
economic indicators such as Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit Cost Ratio (B/C)
and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) have been computed.
The economic justification has been substantiated by the following studies:
i)
Economic analysis, covering
a)
Determination of parameters for economic analysis
b)
Qualification of project benefits
c)
Determination of project costs
d)
Calculation of economic indicators such as NPV,
B/C Ratio, EIRR.
ii)
3. PARAMETERS FOR ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Important Parameters used in economic analysis are detailed as under:
3.1.1.
Price Datum
All costs and benefits attributed to the project are expressed in constant March,
2015 price level. No allowance for inflation during and after the construction
period of the project has been taken into account in the economic analysis.
3.1.2.
Exchange Rate
In view of the existence of a freely floating exchange rate in Pakistan, the
calculation of a shadow price is not considered necessary as would be the case
if the exchange rate is not floating. This, however, does not imply that the
balance of payments is considered to be in equilibrium or that such distortion as
import and export taxes do not exist. Exchange rate as prevailing in March,
2015 has been taken as Rs 101=1 US Dollar.
51 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
3.1.3.
Discount Rate
In Pakistan, the marginal productivity of capital is believed to lie somewhere

between 10 and 12 percent. The appraisal wing of the planning Commission,
Government of Pakistan in the recently approved PC-1s is using OCC
(Opportunity Cost of Capital) of 12%. For this study also a discount rate of 12%
has been used for economic appraisal.
3.1.4.
Salvage Value
Salvage value is assumed as 10% and is taken in the last year of operation.
3.1.5.
Energy Generation
The average annual energy generated from the 1200 MW (Installed capacity) RLNG based combined cycle power plant project is estimated at 6307 GWh,
which is used here for economic analysis.
4. ECONAMIC ANALYSIS
Economic appraisal of proposed R-LNG based combined cycle power plant
project has been carried out by comparing it with an equivalent High Sulphur
Furnace Oil (HSFO) based combined power plant. It may be referred here that
for the purpose of analysis "With" and "Without" project scenarios were
developed. The "Without Project" scenario is represents HSFO based combined
cycle power plant while With Project" scenario is represented by R-LNG based
combined cycle power plant. The comparison of the total cost (capital,
operational and fuel cost) stream under the two scenarios and the resultant
savings due to operations of R-LNG based power plant provided the benefits to
the economy.
4.1.COSTS UNDER WITHOUT & WITH PROJECT
Unlike the general infrastructure projects, the economic appraisal of the
proposed project has been carried out by comparing it with an equivalent HSFO
based power plant. For the purpose of analysis "With" and "Without" project
scenarios have been developed. The "Without Project scenario represent a
HSFO based power plant to generate 6307 GWh energy, while "With Project"
scenario is represented by R-LNG based combined cycle power plant.
The cost stream "With and "Without project scenarios have been compared
over the life of the project. Difference of the two costs is taken as cost savings
or benefits due to proposed project. Full details of capital and operating costs of
52 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
HSFO based combined cycle power equivalent as well as those of LNG based
combined cycle power plant are detailed in Section 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 here below.
1.1.1.Costs of Equivalent HSFO Based Combined Cycle Power Facility

These costs include Capital Costs, Operation and Maintenance Costs, Fuel Costs
and also replacement Costs. These costs of equivalent thermal power plant
have been developed using typical US$/kW specific costs prevailing in the
power market.
1.1.1.1. Capital Cost of Equivalent HSFO based Combined cycle Power
Facility
The capital cost of equivalent HSFO (High Sulphur Furnace Oil) based combined
power facility is estimated cost 960 million US$ (MUSD) as detailed in table-2
Table-2 Investment Costs Computation
Cost of Equivalent HSFO based Combined
cycle Power Plant
0.8 Million US$ per

MW
Plant Capacity
1200MW
Total Investment Costs

(0.8* 1200)
960 Million US$
As the analysis has been undertaken in US$ million, thereby the capital costs in
economic terms has been taken as same as 960 Million US$. These costs are
phased over the period of Five years as given in Table-3
R-LNG Based Power Plant

Table-3 Investment Costs
Year
Financial/Econo
53 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
1
2
3
4
5
Total:
mic Costs
12.24
192.00
288.00
288.00
179.76
960.00
1.1.1.2. Recurrent Costs of Equivalent HSFO based Combined Cycle Power facility
O&M Costs
The total Annual O&M cost of the equivalent thermal plant is estimated as 36.24
Million US$. The fixed O&M cost is estimated as 4.8 Million US$ per annum and
variable O&M is calculated as 31.54 Million US$. The detail is given in table-4
Table-4 O&M Costs
Fixed O&M Costs (US$/KW) per annum
US$ 4/KW
Fixed O&M Costs per annum (Million

US$)
(4x1000x1200/1000000)
Variable O&M Costs (US$ cents/KWh)
Energy Generation (net available energy
for sale) GWh
Variable O&M Costs per annum (Million
US$)
(0.5/100*6307)
Total Annual O&M Cost (Million US$)
4.80
0.50
6307
31.54
36.34
Fuel cost
Cost of fuel (furnace oil) for generation of 6307 GWh energy is calculated as
750.36 Million US$ and 641.33 Million US$ per annum in financial and economic
term respectively and detailed in Table-5.
Table-5 Fuel Costs
Parameters
HSFO Economic Price*(Rs./M.Ton)
GST (%)
HSFO Financial Price (Rs./M.Ton)
51350+(51350x0.17)
HSFO Financial Price(Rs/Kg)
60080/1000
Value
51350
17
60080
60.80
54 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
HSFO Economic Price (Rs/Kg)

51350/1000
Heating Value of Fuel (KJ/Kg)
Exchange Rate US$ 1=Rs 101
Plant Efficiency (%)
Conversion (KJ-KWh)
51.35
Fuel Financial Cost (Rs/KWh)

(60.08/101/40000)x3600/45%
Fuel Economic Cost (Rs/KWh)
(51.35/101/40000)x3600/45%
Energy Generation (GWh)
Total Annual Fuel Cost (Financial Term)
(Million US$) (11.90x6307)
Total Annual Fuel Cost (Economic Term)
(Million US$) (10.17x6307)
40000
101
45%
1KWh=3600
KJ
11.90
10.17
6307
750.36
641.34
1.1.1.3. Annual Stream of Costs

Detailed costs of equivalent HSFO based combined cycle Power plant (without
project) are discussed in detail in section 4.1.1 and annual streams of costs in
financial terms as well as in economic terms are given in Table-6.
1.1.2.Costs of R-LNG based Combined cycle Power Plant
These include project investment costs and also annual recurring costs.
1.1.2.1. Capital Costs
Total project investment costs are estimated as 839.833 Million US$. For the
economic analysis, the costs excluding custom duties of US$ 31.85 Million have
been deducted from the costs. The total investment costs thus calculated as
807.98 Million US$. The costs phased over a construction period of four years
are detailed in Table-7.
Table-7 Annual Phasing of Capital Costs
(Million US$)
Year
1
2
3
4
Total
cost:
Construction Costs
Financial/
12.24
326.06
320.13
149.55
807.98
*Net of custom duties
1.1.2.2. Recurrent Costs

Annual Operating & Maintenance (O&M) cost of proposed facility is estimated as
17.24 Million US$.
55 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
1.1.2.3. Fuel costs

Annual fuel cost of R-LNG Power Plant has been calculated as 377.58 Million US$
on the basis of LNG price of 10US$/MMBTU.
1.1.2.4. Annual Stream of costs
Detailed costs of proposed power plant (with project) are discussed in detail in
section 4.1.2 and annual streams of costs in financial terms as well as in
economic terms are given in Table-8.
1.2. COST SAVINGS/BENEFITS DUE TO PROPOSED PROJECT
A summary of the two cost streams i.e. costs under without project conditions
(equivalent HSFO based Combined cycle Power Plant) and the same under with
project conditions (of proposed LNG based Combined cycle Power Plant) in
economic terms is given in Table-9. Difference of the two costs is taken as cost
savings or benefits to the economy due to proposed project. The saving benefits
over the life of the project including construction period are estimated and also
appear in the same table.
5. RESULTS OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
The discounted cash flow of net economic benefits given in table-9 and the EIRR
is computed as 51.71 percent. The economic indicators, thus estimated are
summarized in Table-10.
Table-10 Results of the Economic Analysis
Economic Parameters
-Present worth of HSFO based combined cycle Power

plant Costs (Million US$)- without project
-Present Worth of R-LNG based power plant Costs
(Million US$)- with project
-Net Present Value (Million US$)
-B/C Ratio
-EIRR (Percent)
Results at
12%
Discount
Rate
3750.04
2620.90
1129.14
1.43:1
51.71
5.1.SENSITIVITY / RISK ANALYSIS

In order to examine the effect on the EIRR, the following sensitivity tests have
been considered:
Sensitivity Test Assumptions
(i) Increase in proposed power plant costs by 10%
(ii) Decrease in HSFO based combined cycle Power Plant costs by 10%.
56 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
(iii) Increase in proposed power plant costs by 20%.

Detailed calculation of economic analysis is given in Table-10. The results of the
sensitivity analysis are summarized in Table-11.
Table-11 Sensitivity Analysis

Description
Base Case*
EIRR
(Percent)
51.71
37.69
(i)10 percent increase in proposed power

plant costs
36.43
(ii)10 percent decrease in HSFO based
combined cycle power plant costs
27.75
(iii)10 percent increase in power plant costs
*Comparison between Equivalent HSFO based Combined Cycle Power plant and
proposed power Plant.
6. RECOMMENDATION
The results given above indicate that, at 12% discount rate, the calculated EIRR
is well above 12% (the assumed opportunity cost of capital in Pakistan). The
results of sensitivity analysis also show that in all the cases the calculated EIRR
is above 12 percent, so, the proposed project is not sensitive to changes in
assumptions as stated above. Therefore the proposed project is deemed to be
viable, should therefore be implemented as planned.
57 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
With Project
Table-8
LNG based Combined Cycle
LNG based Combined Cycle Power Plant Costs in Financial & Economic Terms
(US$.Million)
LNG based Combined Cycle Power Plant Costs in
n
Year
Investment**
Costs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
1
2
3
4
12.24
326.06
320.13
149.55
Total
807.98
Financial Terms
O&M
Costs
Of fuel
Costs
(LNG)
0
0
0
0
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
534.30
11705.06
Total
Costs
Investment**
Costs
12.24
326.06
320.13
149.55
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
12.24
326.06
320.13
149.55
-79.57
Economic Terms
O&M
Cost of fuel
(LNG)
Costs
0
0
0
0
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
17.24
377.58
13047.34
807.98
534.30
11705.06
Total
Costs
12.24
326.06
320.13
149.55
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
12967.77
*As the analysis has been undertaken in US$ Million. The cost in Economic Terms is the same as financial.
**Net of custom Duty.
Note: Savings value is taken as 10% of the total cost in the last year of operation.
58 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
Table-9
LNG based Combined Cycle Power Plant
Derivation of Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR)
Comparison with equivalent HSFO based Combined Cycle Power Plant
(
US$.Million)
n
Without Project
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Equivalent HSFO
based Combined
Cycle Power PlantWithout Project
12.24
192.00
288.00
288.00
179.76
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
602.10
Total:-
21214.59
Discount
rates
10%
12%
16%
Present Worth of Costs
With
Project
Combined
Cycle LNG Plant
Net Cost
Savings
Sensitivity Tests
(Net cost savings under Various Assumptions)
12.24
326.06
320.13
149.55
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
394.82
315.24
0.00
-134.06
-32.13
138.45
-215.06
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
282.85
286.85
-1.22
-166.66
-64.14
123.49
-254.54
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
243.37
255.33
-1.22
-153.26
-60.93
109.65
-233.04
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
215.09
226.64
-2.45
-199.27
-96.16
108.54
-294.02
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
203.89
223.80
12967.77
8246.82
6950.04
6125.36
5653.27
Net Present Worth
4658.49
3750.04
3176.60
2620.90
1481.89
1129.14
1164.04
867.05
1016.04
754.14
846.57
604.96
2575.04
1889.27
685.77
496.84
428.26
307.91
36.43
27.75
Economic Internal Rate of Return =

51.71
37.69
BENEFIT/COST RATIO AT 12 % D.R. =
1.43 :1
(a) Proposed Plant Costs increased by 10%
(b) Equivalent HSFO based combined cycle Power Plant Costs decreased by 10%
(c) Proposed Plant Costs increased by 20%
59 | P a g e

PC-1 Proforma
Table-6
LNG Combined Cycle Power Plant
Equivalent HSFO based Combined Cycle Power Plant Costs in Financial & Economic
Terms
(US$.Million)
N
year
Equivalent HSFO based Combined Cycle Power Plant Costs in

Financial Terms
Economic Terms*
Investme
O&M
Cost
Total
Investment
O&M
Cost of
nt
Costs
Of fuel
Costs
costs
Costs
fuel
Costs
(Furnace
(Furnace
oil)
Oil)
1
1
12.24
0
0
12.24
12.24
0
0
2
2
192.00
0
0
192.00
192.00
0
0
3
3
288.00
0
0
288.00
288.00
0
0
4
4
288.00
0
0
288.00
288.00
0
0
5
5
179.76
0
0
179.76
179.76
0
0
6
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
7
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
8
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
9
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
10
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
11
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
12
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
13
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
14
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
15
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
16
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
17
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
18
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
19
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
20
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
21
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
22
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
23
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
24
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
25
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
26
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
27
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
28
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
29
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
30
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
31
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
32
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
33
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
34
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
35
36.34
750.36
786.70
36.34
641.34
Total
960.00
1090.08
22510.90
24560.98
960.00
1090.08
19240.08
*As the analysis has been undertaken in US$ Million. The cost in Economic Terms is the same as Financial.
Note: Salvage value is taken as 10% of the total cost in the last year of operation
Total
Costs
12.24
192.00
288.00
288.00
179.76
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
677.67
602.10
21214.59
60 | P a g e

Nisar 1 To 6

Încărcat de

Informații document

Descriere originală:

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Nisar 1 To 6

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kheshgi Nowshera

Ministry of Energy and Power

DESIGN, SUPPLY, ERECTION, TESTING &

Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Ministry Energy and Power Government of Khyber

1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kheshgi Nowshera

National Engineering Services Pakistan (Pvt)

the Project And Analysis.......................................31

11.4 Environmental Impact assessment.......................................32

1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kheshgi Nowshera

11.5 Financial Analysis..................................................................33

1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kheshgi Nowshera

1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kheshgi Nowshera

Ton per Hour

British Thermal Unit

1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kheshgi Nowshera

1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined Cycle Gas Power Plant at

Ministry of Energy and Power, Government of Khyber

1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kheshgi Nowshera

iii. Operation &

iv. Concerned federal

III. If the project is proposed

Based on successful experience of operating and

The project is not included in the medium term / five

The acute energy shortage in the country demand

1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kheshgi Nowshera

help narrowing the gap in the supply and demand.

Serious infrastructure shortages have emerged

II. In case of revised

1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kheshgi Nowshera

1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kheshgi Nowshera

The CCPP project near Kheshgi Distract Nowshera has

The objective of power plants is to supply uninterrupted

A Simplified Conceptual Diagram of Combined Cycle

Address of the site

1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kheshgi Nowshera

INTERCONNECTION SHEMES FOR R-LNG BASED POWER

1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kheshgi Nowshera

The infrastructure facilities required for the project are

The installed capacity of power plants in Pakistan is more

Minimum Net Efficiency (LHV) in

natural gas (RLNG)

Combined cycle operation

Single cycle mode operation required,

1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kheshgi Nowshera

With bypass stacks/damper behind GTs

Once-through cooling system with water

From adjacent canal plus wet/dry cooling

The plant shall be complete in all respect

with auxiliaries and Balance of plant

Potentially, evaporate cooling for GT air intakes

Spare parts for 2 years operation

LTSA from GT-OEM for 48,000 OH (6 Years)

ALS 500 kV switchyard in 1 breaker type

The design shall provide maximum levels of reliability and availability,

Civil works for GT foundations

1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kheshgi Nowshera

Gas Turbine, Steam Turbine, Generators and Balance of plant:

Heavy Duty Gas Turbines, Generators and Auxiliaries

1000-2000 MW (Gross) Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kheshgi Nowshera

Control equipment room

Civil work as required for the project,