Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
JIEC 2496 18
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry xxx (2015) xxxxxx
Analytical and Polymer Research Laboratory, Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh
202002, UP, India
b
Center of Excellence for Scientic Research Collaboration with MIT, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Received 23 February 2014
Received in revised form 18 November 2014
Accepted 31 December 2014
Available online xxx
Keywords:
Polymer
Composite membranes
Cation exchanger
Cu(II) selective electrode
9
10
Introduction
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.12.045
1226-086X/ 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry.
Please cite this article in press as: U. Baig, A.A. Khan, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.12.045
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
G Model
JIEC 2496 18
U. Baig, A.A. Khan / Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry xxx (2015) xxxxxx
Table 2
Conditions of preparation and ion-exchange capacity of various Polyurethanecerium(IV) phosphate cation-exchange composite membranes.
51
Experimental
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
Synthesis
60
61
62
63
64
65
Cerium(IV) phosphate
Preparation of cerium(IV) phosphate was carried out by taking
different ratios of 0.1 mol L1 Ce(SO4)24H2O (prepared in
1 mol L1 H2SO4 solution) and an aqueous solution of ortho
phosphoric acid (prepared with demineralized water) under
varying conditions given in Table 1 [20,21].
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
Polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate cation exchange composite membranes were prepared in various weight ratios of
cerium(IV) phosphate with polyurethane by solution casting
method. 500 mg polyurethane was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran
(THF) at room temperature. A controlled amount of cerium(IV)
phosphate (200, 300, 400, 500, 800 and 1000 mg) were dispersed in
to polyurethane solution in THF. Mechanical stirring was applied
for at least 24 h at room temperature in order to obtain
homogeneous cerium(IV) phosphate dispersed polyurethane
solution. The polymer dispersed was cast on to clean glass plates
and kept for 48 h at room temperature to allow complete
evaporation of THF. The resultant composite membranes were
cautiously peeled out of the glass plates and rinsed with doubly
distilled water on both sides and dried at room temperature.
Polyurethane membrane was prepared with a similar method. The
dried polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate composite membranes
were converted into H+-form through immersion in 1 mol L1
HNO3 for 2 days with occasional shaking intermittently replacing
the supernatant liquid with fresh 1 mol L1 HNO3 two to three
times. The excess was removed after several washings with DMW
and nally dried at room temperature. The condition of preparation and the ion-exchange capacity (IEC), of the cation exchange
composite membranes are given in Table 2.
91
92
93
94
95
Appearance
of the
sample
Na+ ion-exchange
capacity in
(mequiv./g)
Ortho-phosphoric
Cerium
acid
sulphate
(stock solution)
CP-1
CP-2
CP-3
1
2
3
1 (2 mol L1)
1 (2 mol L1)
1 (2 mol L1)
Amount of Amount of
Stirring Ion-exchange
Membrane Amount of
polyurethane cerium(IV) tetrahydofuran time (h) capacity
no.
(PU) in mg
phosphate (T.H.F) in ml
(mequiv./g)
(mg)
PUCPM-1
PUCPM-2
PUCPM-3
PUCPM-4
PUCPM-5
PUCPM-6
500
500
500
500
500
500
200
300
400
500
800
1000
50
50
50
50
75
75
24
24
24
24
24
24
0.95
1.16
1.19
1.24
1.34
1.79
96
97
98
99
100
101
Characterization
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
Thermal studies
The degradation process and the thermal stability of polyurethane membrane and polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate cation
exchange composite membranes were investigated by thermogravimetic analysis (TGA) and differential thermal gravimetry
(DTG) using thermal analyzer-V2.2A DuPont 9900.
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
Please cite this article in press as: U. Baig, A.A. Khan, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.12.045
G Model
JIEC 2496 18
U. Baig, A.A. Khan / Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry xxx (2015) xxxxxx
140
141
142
143
Potential measurements
144
145
146
147
148
1
SCEj0:1 mol L
CuIIjjMembranejjtest solutionjSCE
151
150
149
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
Effect of pH
pH solution ranging from 1 to 13 were prepared at
1 103 mol L1 constant ion concentration. The value of electrode potential at each pH was recorded and plot of electrode
potential versus pH was plotted.
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
v
KAB
161
162
163
164
aA
aB zA=zB
(1)
186
185
187
Fig. 1. FTIR spectra of polyurethane (a), cerium(IV)phosphate (b) and polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate cation exchange composite membrane (c).
Please cite this article in press as: U. Baig, A.A. Khan, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.12.045
G Model
JIEC 2496 18
U. Baig, A.A. Khan / Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry xxx (2015) xxxxxx
Fig. 2. SEM image of pure polyurethane (a), cerium(IV) phosphate (b) and polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate composite membrane at different magnications (c).
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
Polyurethane
Polyurethane-ce(IV)phosphate
4000
3500
3000
Intensity (a.u.)
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
2500
2000
Storage of electrodes
The polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate composite membrane
electrode was stored in distilled water when not in use for more
than one day. It was activated with (0.1 mol L1) Cu(II) solution by
keeping immersed in it for 2 h, before use, to compensate for any
loss of metal ions in the membrane phase that might have taken
place due to a long storage in distilled water. Electrode was then
washed thoroughly with DMW before use.
Results and discussion
1500
1000
500
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2Theta (Degree)
Fig. 3. X-ray diffraction pattern of polyurethane and polyurethane-cerium(IV)
phosphate cation exchange composite membrane.
Please cite this article in press as: U. Baig, A.A. Khan, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.12.045
G Model
JIEC 2496 18
U. Baig, A.A. Khan / Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry xxx (2015) xxxxxx
10 0 .0
1.0 0 0
9 0 .0
0 .5 0 0
10 0 .0
(a)
9 0 .0
8 0 .0
8 0 .0
7 0 .0
7 0 .0
6 0 .0
6 0 .0
5 0 .0
5 0 .0
4 0 .0
4 0 .0
3 0 .0
3 0 .0
2 0 .0
2 0 .0
10 .0
10 .0
TG %
-0 .5 0 0
TG %
DTG mg/min
0 .0 0 0
-1.0 0 0
-1.5 0 0
-2 .0 0 0
0 .0
0 .0
1 0 0 .0
2 0 0 .0
3 0 0 .0
4 0 0 .0
5 0 0 .0
T em p C el
6 0 0 .0
7 0 0 .0
1 0 0 .0
10 0 .0
2 0 0 .0
9 0 .0
1 0 0 .0
-1 0 0 .0
TG %
DTG ug/min
0 .0
9 5 .0
(b)
9 0 .0
8 5 .0
8 5 .0
8 0 .0
8 0 .0
7 5 .0
7 5 .0
7 0 .0
7 0 .0
6 5 .0
6 5 .0
6 0 .0
6 0 .0
5 5 .0
5 5 .0
5 0 .0
5 0 .0
4 5 .0
4 5 .0
TG %
9 5 .0
-2 0 0 .0
-3 0 0 .0
-4 0 0 .0
1 0 0 .0
2 0 0 .0
3 0 0 .0
4 0 0 .0
5 0 0 .0
T em p C el
6 0 0 .0
7 0 0 .0
Fig. 4. TGA and DTA curves of polyurethane (a) and polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate cation exchange composite membrane (b).
Thickness (mm)
Total wet
weight (%)
Porosity
Swelling (%)
PUCPM-1
PUCPM-2
PUCPM-3
PUCPM-4
PUCPM-5
PUCPM-6
0.165
0.174
0.182
0.194
0.199
0.201
1.906
1.813
1.983
1.997
1.772
1.476
0.0019
0.0021
0.0022
0.0021
0.0023
0.0017
0.3412
0.3682
0.4352
0.4561
0.5672
0.1201
500
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
450
400
350
300
12
10
2+
-log [Cu ]
Fig. 5. Calibration curve for polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate cation exchange
composite membrane (PUCPM-6) electrode in aqueous solution of Cu(NO3)2.
Please cite this article in press as: U. Baig, A.A. Khan, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.12.045
223
224
225
226
227
228
G Model
JIEC 2496 18
U. Baig, A.A. Khan / Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry xxx (2015) xxxxxx
Table 4
Potentiometric response of ve independent polyurethane-cerium(IV)phosphate
membrane electrodes for Cu2+.
1
2
3
4
5
Linear range
30.00
29.96
29.95
29.95
29.96
1 101
1 101
1 101
1 101
1 101
to
to
to
to
to
RSD (%)
(n = 6)
1.5
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.8
Compared with Fig. 2(a), some peaks are shifted in the polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate composite membrane from 1228,
1415, 609, 508 cm1, to 1224, 1401, 616, 539 cm1 respectively,
indicating the formation of polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate
composite membrane.
Fig. 2(ac) shows the FE-SEM image of pure polyurethane,
cerium(IV) phosphate and polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate
composite membrane at different magnications, indicating the
binding of inorganic material, i.e. silica gel with organic polymer,
i.e. polyurethane. The pictures showed that the difference in
surface morphology of organic polymer, inorganic material and
composite membrane. It has been revealed that after binding of
polyurethane with cerium(IV) phosphate, the morphology has
been changed. It is also observed in Fig. 2(c) that the prepared
organic-inorganic polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate composite
membrane is homogeneous and dense.
Fig. 3 illustrates the diffractograms of pure polyurethane and
polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate composite membrane in the
2u range between 58 and 808. In the diffractogram of pure
polyurethane there are no sharp diffraction peaks, conrming their
amorphous nature. The polyurethane is known to be an amorphous
polymer and shows a broad diffraction peak at 2u values 10308.
On the addition of cerium(IV)phosphate in the polyurethane
matrix, the intensity of the peak 10308 become shifted. These
intensity changes in the composite membrane due to the
interaction between polyurethane and cerium(IV)phosphate and
some small peaks are situated in the diffractogram of polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate composite membrane at 2u values
28.28, 32.18, 428 and 488.
Fig. 4 shows the thermogravimetric stability data of polyurethane and polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate composite membrane. It can be concluded from this gure that the thermal
500
480
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
Nerstian slope
(mV/decade)
(n = 6)
460
435
Electrode
440
430
425
420
415
410
405
400
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Time (Sec)
Fig. 7. Dynamic response time of polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate cation
exchange composite membrane electrode for Cu2+ ions.
stability of polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate composite membrane is higher than that of pure polyurethane. At 800 8C the
percentage of residual weight of polyurethane and polyurethanecerium(IV) phosphate composite membrane is 0.00% and 44.00%
respectively. Therefore the addition of cerium(IV) phosphate
cation exchanger improves the thermal stability of composite
membrane.
The thickness, swelling, porosity, water content capacity, etc. of
the polyurethane-cerium (IV) phosphate cation exchange composite membrane was investigated and the results are summarized
in Table 3. Thus, the low orders of water content, swelling and
porosity with less thickness of this membrane suggest that the
interstices are negligible and diffusion across the membrane would
occur mainly through the exchange sites. Hence, membrane
Table 5
The selectivity coefcient of various interfering cations for Cu2+ selective
polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate membrane electrode.
Interfering ion (Mn+)
Selectivity
coefcients (KMSM)
K+
Na+
Mg2+
Ca2+
Mn2+
Fe2+
Zn2+
Cd2+
Pb2+
Hg2+
2.8 103
1.89 103
5.5 103
2.9 103
2.15 103
1.56 104
0.98 104
0.87 104
1.30 105
0.56 105
440
Table 6
Determination of Cu2+ added to a drinking water sample containing different
concentrations of copper.
420
Detected
RSD (%) Recovery
Added Detected RSD (%) Recovery
Cu2+ by
(n = 5) by membrane Cu2+ By AAS (n = 5) by AAS (%)
Cu2+
electrode (%) (mg L1)
(mg L1) membrane
electrode
(mg L1)
400
380
0
10
pH
Fig. 6. Effect of pH on electrode potential of polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate
cation exchange composite membrane (PUCPM-6)) electrode at 1 103 M Cu2+ ion.
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
1.88
3.76
5.69
7.62
9.69
1.05
1.11
1.07
1.08
1.04
94.00
94.00
94.83
95.25
96.90
1.93
3.82
5.75
7.80
9.81
1.01
1.03
1.01
1.02
1.03
Please cite this article in press as: U. Baig, A.A. Khan, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.12.045
96.00
95.50
95.88
97.50
98.10
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
G Model
JIEC 2496 18
U. Baig, A.A. Khan / Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry xxx (2015) xxxxxx
Table 7
Comparison of the proposed Cu(II) ion membrane electrode with the reported electrodes.
Refs.
Electroactive material
Response
time (s)
Linear range
pH range
[26]
30 s
1.05.3
29.6
5s
30 s
10 s
14 s
1.35.5
1.06.0
0.66.0
2.56.5
29.5 1
30
28 1
30.00
[27]
[28]
[29]
Present work
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
Nerstian slope
(mV/decade)
Detection limit
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
Potentiometric selectivity
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
Accuracy
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
Conclusion
366
The proposed potentiometric sensor of polyurethane-cerium(IV) phosphate composite membrane showed good operating
characteristics including Nernstian response, reasonable detection
limit, relatively high selectivity, wide dynamic range and fast
response. These characteristics and the typical applications
presented in this paper makes this sensor suitable for measuring
Cu(II) content in real samples without a signicant interaction
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
Please cite this article in press as: U. Baig, A.A. Khan, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.12.045
G Model
JIEC 2496 18
8
U. Baig, A.A. Khan / Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry xxx (2015) xxxxxx
374
375
376
377
378
Acknowledgements
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
References
388
389
390 Q2
391
392
393
394
395
[6] C.F. Nrgaard, U.G. Nielsen, E.M. Skou, Solid State Ionics 213 (2012) 7682.
[7] B.P. Tripathi, V.K. Shahi, Prog. Polym. Sci. 36 (2011) 945979.
[8] J.X. Leong, W.R.W. Daud, M. Ghasemi, K.B. Liew, M. Ismail, Ren. Sust. Ener. Rev. 28
(2013) 575587.
[10] V.V. Volkov, T.A. Kravchenko, I.R. Vyacheslav, Rus. Chem. Rev. 82 (2013)
465482.
[11] X. Zuo, S. Yu, W. Shi, Desalination 290 (2012) 8388.
[12] A.A. Khan, U. Baig, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 18 (2012) 19371944.
[13] A.A. Khan, U. Baig, Desalination 319 (2013) 1017.
[14] A.A. Khan, U. Baig, Desalination 289 (2012) 2126.
[15] A.A. Khan, U. Baig, M. Khalid, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 4 (2013) 12261233.
[16] A.A. Khan, L. Paquiza, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 6 (2014) 42614266.
[17] A.A. Khan, L. Paquiza, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. (2014) (in press).
[18] N. Wang, C. Wu, Y. Cheng, T. Xu, Inter. J. Pharma 408 (2011) 3949.
[19] S.D. Faust, O.M. Aly, Adsorption Processes for Water Treatment, Butterworth,
London, 1987.
[20] A.A. Khan, U. Baig, Composites B 56 (2014) 862868.
[21] A.A. Khan, R. Ahmad, A. Khan, P.K. Mondal, Am. J. Chem. 157 (2011) 122129.
[22] Recommendation for publishing manuscripts on ion-selective electrodes (prepared for publication by G.G. Guilbault), Commission on Analytical Nomenclature, Analytical chemistry Division, IUPAC, Ion-Sel El Rev 1969;1:139.
[23] A.K. Jain, R.P. Singh, C. Bala, Anal. Lett. 15 (1982) 15571563.
[24] Peahkovaskii VV, Melnikova RY, Dzyuva ED. Atlas of Infra red spectra of phosphate, orthophosphate. Moscow: Nauka; 1985.
[25] Y. Umezawa, K. Umezawa, H. Sato, Pure Appl. Chem. 67 (1995) 507.
[26] L.P. Singh, J.M. Bhatnagar, Talanta 64 (2004) 313319.
[27] A. Abbaspour, M.A. Kamyabi, Anal. Chim. Acta 455 (2002) 225231.
[28] S.K. Mittal, S.K.A. Kumar, N. Gupta, S. Kaur, S. Kumar, Anal. Chim. Acta 585 (2007)
161170.
[29] M.H. Mashhadizadeh, A. Mostafavi, R. Razavi, M. Shamsipur, Sens. Actuators B 86
(2002) 222228.
Please cite this article in press as: U. Baig, A.A. Khan, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.12.045
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426