Sunteți pe pagina 1din 20

Budapest University of Technology and Economics

Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures


English courses
Reinforced Concrete Structures
Code: BMEEPSTK601
Lecture no. 9:

TWO-WAY SLABS

Reinforced Concrete 2012

lecture 9/1

Content:
1. Definition, internal force components
2. Methods of analysis of two-way slabs
3. The method of Marcus
4. The effect of fixing the corners of the slab against lifting
5. The yield line theory
6. Design conditions set up for the parameter to determine the
yield line pattern
7. Application of the yield line theory for more complex situations
8. Application of the yield line theory for different support condtions
and ground plan forms
9. Numerical example

Reinforced Concrete 2012

lecture 9/2

1. Definition, internal force components

specific force components


in unit-length sections of twoway slabs
If l sh 0,5l l , the interaction of perpendicular strips of the slab through
torsion (tx and ty (kNm/m)) is taken into account by determining the
internal force distribution: the slab is regarded two-way slab
Reinforced Concrete 2012

lecture 9/3

2. Methods of analysis of two-way slabs


The partial differential equation of slabs:
p
4w
4w
4w
w: deflection p=p(x,y) load
+
+
=

4
2 2
2 2
EI
x
x y
x y
Analythical solutions
-exact: were only elaborated for very simple cases
(for example: uniformly distributed load, rectangular slab, simply
supported along the perimeter, EI= constant)
-approximate analythical solutions by use of Fourier functions for
limited no. of cases
Numerical solutions can be computerized:
-method of finite differences, finite element method (FEM)
Results of both analythical and numerical solutions are available in
tabulated form.
Two manual approximate methods will be shown below.
Reinforced Concrete 2012

lecture 9/4

3. The method of Marcus


For rectangular slab, simply supported along the perimeter, loaded with
uniformly distributed load.
The load is distributed between series of two perpendicular strips by
considering the condition, that at the intersection of two perpendicular
strips the deflection is the same (effect of torsion is neglected):

5 p l l 4l
5 psh l 4sh
wl =
= w sh =
384 EI
384 EI

By introducing the parameters sh =

Reinforced Concrete 2012

l
p
l = sh
psh l l
p= psh+p

(1)
(2)

psh
p
and l = l
p
p
lecture 9/5

sh =

l = 1 sh

l
1 + sh
ll
The load intensities can then be determined:
psh= shp and p= p
For the two extreme cases, this yields in:

sh = l = 0,5
sh 0,9 0,1

Reinforced Concrete 2012

lecture 9/6

4. The effect of fixing the corners of the slab against lifting


the corners of the slab lift, if they are
not loaded by vertical forces of constructions above, resulting in torsional
moments
Moment distribution
along a diagonal strip
Moments equilibrium at corners

p
(1,1l) 2
pl 2
2
m=
= 0,3
28
8
Reinforced Concrete 2012

lecture 9/7

Top reinforcement designed for negative moments


bottom bars
in practice:
top mesh reinforcement parallel to supports is used with the same intensity
as that, designed for positive moments
top bars

Reinforced Concrete 2012

lecture 9/8

5. The yield line theory


Yield lines: straight lines along primary cracks
Along yield lines: m=mmax, v=0
y = l l where can be freely
,
ml
adopted between 0,1 and 0,5 .
For example:
yield line

lsh

1l
opt = sh
(results min.
2 ll
quantity of reinforcement)

msh

More exact model at corners:


Reinforced Concrete 2012

lecture 9/9

Equilibrium of triangular and trapezoidal panels of the slab


Consider one of the triangular panels and the equilibrium of moments
with respect to axis y :

pl sh y y
= m l l sh
2 3
2
2
py 2
4 2 pl 2l
2 l l p 8 2 pl l
ml =
=
=
=
= l m o, l
6
6
6
8
3
8

My=0:

pl 2l
4 2
where l = and m o, l =
3
8

Reinforced Concrete 2012

lecture 9/10

Consider now one of the trapezoidal panels and the equilibrium of


moments with respect to axis x :
Mx=0:
l l
l
l
l
2 l sh p sh + (l l 2l l ) sh p sh = m sh l l
2
23
2 22
Expressing msh, we get:
4 pl 2sh
msh= (1 )
= sh m o,sh
3
8
pl 2sh
4
where: sh = 1 and mo,sh=
3
8
The load p =pEd will be substituted in direction of the shorter and longer
span respectively with modified values corresponding to the directions:
4
4
(p sh + p l p)
p l = 2 p
p sh = 1 p
3
3

Reinforced Concrete 2012

lecture 9/11

6. Design conditions set up for the parameter to determine


the yield line pattern
2

1l
Beside = opt = sh some further conditions that can be set up to
2 ll
determine the value of the parameter :
-let the steel necessary in direction of the longer span be equal to
the area of the distribution steel of that necessary in direction of the
shorter span: as,=0,2as,sh (or approximately: m=0,2msh)
-let the reinforcement be same in the two perpendicular directions:
as,=as,sh (or approximately: m=msh)
-let the triangle of the yield line pattern be rectangular:
y = l l = 0,5l sh that is: = 0,5l sh / l l
Limits of y determine limites of , which should be checked:
ll
l
y l that is: 0,1 0,5
10
2
Reinforced Concrete 2012

lecture 9/12

7. Application of the yield-line theory for more komplex situations:


-a system of continuous two-way slabs

Reinforced Concrete 2012

lecture 9/13

-irregular ground plan forms can be completed to rectangle and handled


like that

Reinforced Concrete 2012

lecture 9/14

8. Application of the yield line theory for different support


condtions of rectangualr slabs and different ground plan forms

-rectangular slab panel simply supported along three sides


and free along the forth side:
the maximum
moment:
m = p Ed l 2x / 8 ,

Reinforced Concrete 2012

lecture 9/15

-rectangular slab with two free neighbouring edges and two


restrained edges:
the maximum
moment:
m = p Ed l 2x / 8

-rectangular slab with two free neighbouring edges and two


restrained edges
Maximum
moment:
m = p Ed l 2y / 2
Reinforced Concrete 2012

lecture 9/16

Circular and other ground plan forms that can be characterized


with inscribed circle, simply supported along the perimeter
p Ed D 2
m=
8

a
1
1

Reinforced Concrete 2012

lecture 9/17

9. Numerical example
Rectangular slab simply supported along the perimeter with
optimal sidelength rate
Problemt
By what sidelength rate will the relationship msh = 5 m be true just at
= opt ? Lifting of the corners is impeded.
Solution

l sh
=
ll
1
opt = 2
2

Let be:

Reinforced Concrete 2012

(1)

lecture 9/18

pl 2sh
4
4 2 pl 2l
(1- opt )
= 5. opt
3
8
3
8
From (2) with the substitution

(2)

l sh
ll

= we get:

4
20 2
(1- opt ) 2 =
opt
3
3
By expressing 2 and substituting it in (1):

4
1 20 2
opt (1- opt ) = opt
3
2 3
We get the solution
1 l
1
opt = 0,214 = ( r ) 2 = 2
2 lh
2
Reinforced Concrete 2012

lecture 9/19

= 2 0,214 = 0,654
That means: in case of sh = 0,654 , or = 1,528sh that is at about
by the sidelength rate 1:1,5 will the rate of moments in the two
directions be equal to 1:5 just by = opt .
In the shorter direction will then be
4
4
sh = 1 = 1 0,214 = 0,715
3
3
2
pl
msh = 0,715 sh
8
that is by 28,5 % smaller, then in case of not taken into account the
effect of two-way ection. It is reasonable not to forget this rate, and try
to apply in the practice when possible!
Reinforced Concrete 2012

lecture 9/20

S-ar putea să vă placă și