Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The study examines the Role of Public Administration in Human Capital Development
in Public Organisations: A Survey of Tertiary Educational Institutions in Rivers State. A cross
sectional survey design was adopted. The sample selection of the sample elements from the
tertiary institutions was done randomly. The research instruments used to collect data for this
study included, questionnaire, personal interviews and personal observations. The study selected
a sample of 379 staff (through the use of Taro Yamanes sample technique) from the 3 tertiary
institutions in Rivers State studied, and 370 copies of questionnaire were actually retrieved from
them (the respondents). After editing the copies of questionnaire only 366 copies representing
(98.92% response rate) were found useful for the data analysis. Descriptive and inferential
statistics were used to analyze the data for this study. Specifically, Pearsons Product Moment
Correlation Coefficient was used to test the hypotheses in the study. The study has revealed that
to a large public administration is a veritable mechanism to achieve development objectives of
government/public related organisation. The study equally revealed that efficient human capital
development in the tertiary institutions in Nigeria is a veritable ingredient for effective service
delivery and organisational success. The study also found that the inefficient human capital
development leads to poor service delivery in the tertiary institutions in Nigeria. Major human
resource challenges faced by workers in tertiary institutions as identified by the study include:
lack of due respect and recognition, uncertainties underlying performance evaluation, bottlenecks
/ bureaucracy, lack of due respect and recognition, uncertainties underlying performance
evaluation, fraud / corruption, management and economic forces, changing government policies,
market forces and so on. It is evident and conclusive in this study that: There is significant
relationship between public administration encouraging effective human capital development and
service delivery in the tertiary institutions in Nigeria; there is significant relationship between
public administration encouraging effective human capital development and the performance of
the lecturers in the tertiary institutions in Nigeria; there is significant relationship between public
administration encouraging effective human capital development and the quality of students
produced by the tertiary institutions in Nigeria and there is significant relationship between
public administration encouraging effective human capital development and controlling of
human resources for service delivery in the tertiary institutions in Nigeria. Therefore, the study
recommends that for the tertiary institutions to successfully cope with the challenges confronting
them and make meaningful contributions in human capital development, the country needs an
education-friendly government, a civilized tertiary educational institutions and public sector that
is ready and willing to invest in university education and give recognition to those who have
chosen the path of knowledge industry.
Keywords:
Introduction
The extent to which human efforts lead to organisational survival and success is better
explained by history of organisations. Human input into the day-to-day operations in the work
place is so wholesome that value oriented professionals like accountants, economists,
educationists and workers had found it difficult to ascribe values to it, (Adelemo, 2011). In
essence, the performance of the employee in the organisation has to be continually sustained,
maintained and improved upon for the organisation to achieve its goals and objectives. In an era
of global industrialization where significant and giant strides are made in technological spheres,
all aimed at creating a conducive habitat for man and all his activities, it has become expedient
that we look at the human capital challenges and career development of workers in the work
place.
Public administration has so much affected the overall development in Nigeria as whole
that a study of this kind has become imperative especially in this strategic sector of the economytertiary educational institution. Human capital development challenges identified in tertiary
institutions include: Bottlenecks, bureaucracy, nepotism, fraud, corruption, laissez faire altitude,
nonchalant attitude of workers, managements mismanagement syndrome, lack of planning,
government / organisations non cooperating attitude, poor salary package / economic factors,
sexual overtures and harassment by some super ordinates, union problems, socio-political
problems, informal groups, religious/ethical problem and discrimination/ marginalization. How
these play on the performance level of workers and many others will be explored.
With the drive towards technological advancement in Nigeria, development of students,
candidates and employees is inevitable in order to optimize performance in tertiary institutions.
For example, the conversions to the use of electronics, computers and telecommunications have
virtually made every industry to change their operations which necessitate workers to cope with
the environmental changes. With the growth and development of modern management
techniques, tertiary educational institutions have evolved strategic options to develop their
manpower for effective performance (Okoroma, 2010). One of the most result-oriented ways to
achieve this target is through the effective career development of human resources; therefore it
becomes imperative that a careful and well-articulated study be conducted on the Role of Public
Administration in Human Capital Development in Public Organisations: A Survey of Tertiary
Educational Institutions in Rivers State.
Objectives of the Study
This study seeks to explore the role of public administration in human capital
development in public organisations with emphasis on tertiary educational institutions in Rivers
State. To that effect the major objectives of this study therefore are:
1.
To determine the extent to which public administration encourages effective human
capital development leading to good service delivery in the tertiary institutions in
Nigeria.
2.
To ascertain the extent to which public administration encourages effective human capital
development leading to the effective performance of the lecturers in the tertiary
institutions in Nigeria.
3.
To find out the extent to which public administration encourages effective human capital
development that leads to the quality of students produced by the tertiary institutions in
Nigeria.
4.
To explore the extent to which public administration encourages effective human capital
development in controlling of human resources for service delivery in the tertiary
institutions in Nigeria.
Research Questions
The purpose of this study as earlier indicated is to examine the Role of Public
Administration in Human Capital Development in Public Organisations: A Survey of Tertiary
Educational Institutions in Rivers State.. In addressing this problem, the following questions
have been raised:
1.
To what extent does public administration encourage effective human capital
development leading to good service delivery in the tertiary institutions in Nigeria?
2.
To what extent does public administration encourage effective human capital
development leading to the performance of the lecturers in the tertiary institutions in
Nigeria?
3.
To what extent does public administration encourage effective human capital
development that leads to the quality of students produced by the tertiary institutions in
Nigeria?
4.
To what extent does public administration encourage effective human capital
development in controlling of human resources for service delivery in the tertiary
institutions in Nigeria?
Research Hypotheses
Having reviewed the background of the problem, the following research hypotheses have
been formulated in this study:
Ho1: There is no significant relationship between public administration encouraging effective
human capital development and service delivery in the tertiary institutions in Nigeria.
Ho2: There is no significant relationship between public administration encouraging effective
human capital development and the performance of the lecturers in the tertiary
institutions in Nigeria.
Ho3: There is no significant relationship between public administration encouraging effective
human capital development and the quality of students produced by the tertiary
institutions in Nigeria.
Ho4: There is no significant relationship between public administration encouraging effective
human capital development and controlling of human resources for service delivery in the
tertiary institutions in Nigeria.
School of Humanities
School of Social Sciences
It changed from a school system to a faculty system in 1982. The university now has ten
faculties:
Faculty of Humanities
Faculty of Social Sciences
Faculty of Education
Faculty of Engineering
Faculty of Dentistry
Faculty of Pharmacy
Faculty of Agriculture
Vision
4
The University of Port Harcourt aims to be ranked amongst the best universities in
Africa, renowned for its teaching, research, creativity and innovation.
Mission
The Mission of the University of Port Harcourt is the pursuit of academic excellence,
advancement of knowledge and community service through quality teaching, life-long learning,
social inclusion, strengthening civil society and policy-relevant research that addresses the
challenges of contemporary society. To achieve this Mission, the University is guided by the
spirit of enquiry, self-reliance, fairness, ethical and professional standards of the disciplines.
Philosophy
The Philosophy of the University of Port Harcourt is: commitment to academic freedom,
tolerance, probity, equal opportunity and respect for cultural diversity.
Rivers State University of Science and Technology, Port Harcourt
The Rivers State University of Science and Technology (RSUST) Port Harcourt was
established in October, 1980 from the Rivers State College of Science and Technology which
was itself established in 1972. It is located at Nkpolu-Oroworukwo in Port Harcourt, the capital
of Rivers State, Nigeria. It is the first Technological University in Nigeria and the first state
owned State University in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. The motto of the University is
"Excellence and Creativity". The University has a staff strength of 1,870 and a student
population of 29,939. The University is ranked as the 16th among 80 other Universities in
Nigeria. The language of instruction in the institution is English.
The Mandate of the University
Rivers State University of Science and Technology was established to:
Produce scientific and technical manpower of various levels needed for essential development;
Produce technical and science teachers for developmental programmes;
Assist in the industrial and other developmental programmes through consultancy services,
special project centres and related activities;
Encourage the advancement of learning to all persons without distinction or race, creed, sex or
political conviction the opportunity of acquiring a higher and liberal education;
Provide courses of instruction and other facilities for the pursuit of learning in all the faculties
and institutes, and to make facilities available on proper terms of such persons as are equipped to
benefit from them;
Encourage and promote scholarship and conduct research in all fields of learning and human
endeavour;
Relate its activities to the social, cultural and economic needs of the people of Nigeria; and
Undertake any other activities appropriate for a University of the highest standard.
Ignatius Ajuru University of Education (IAUE), Port Harcourt
At the end of the civil war in 1970, the Rivers State Government was faced with an acute
shortage of trained teachers for its rapidly expanding programme of post-primary education.
After the required spade work by the Ministry of Education, Rivers State College of Education
opened in temporary quarters at the Catholic Missions Stella Maris College, Port Harcourt on
14th June, 1971 with an initial intake of 116 students, under the headship of Dr. William
Maxwell Jnr., a USAID representative then serving in the State. Rivers State College of
5
Education was born as an autonomous body. With the attainment of full maturity, it became well
placed to play a more dynamic role. There was established for the purposes of the college a
Governing Council which is responsible for the recruitment of staff and for the general and
overall administrative and financial control of the institution. Following this transformation, Mr.
E. Aguma, who was appointed Principal in January 1975,became the first Provost while Dr. E.T.
Green succeeded Mr. Alagoa as the Chairman of Council in June 1975. After an interregnum
created by the change of Government in the country in July 1975, a new Governing Council with
Dr. F.A. Eke, as Chairman, and a new Provost, Mr. R.I.C. Koko, were appointed in November of
the same year. Undeniably, the problem of accommodation greatly inhibited the progress of the
college. For almost six years of its existence, Rivers State College of Education occupied a
compound with very limited number of classrooms and all students lived off-campus. The
college moved to its permanent site at Rumuolumeni in January,1977 although some essential
facilities were still lacking on the campus. This bold step was a definite milestone in the life of
the institution, because physical presence on the spot has placed it in a better position to make
further plans for its continued growth and improvement of existing facilities. A unique event in
the history of the College took place on 11th March 1978 on the occasion of its official opening
and first graduation ceremony. Four sets of students totaling 462 in number received their
diplomas on the successful completion of the Nigeria Certificate in Education (NCE)
programme. The graduands were made up of those who passed their examinations between 1974
and 1977. A great landmark in the history of the institution, this successful graduation ceremony
was an eloquent testimony of the tireless labor of both the college community and the Rivers
State Government in the bold bid to produce well-trained non-graduate teachers for post-primary
institutions. With effect from January 1977, the Ministry of Education made available two top
Model Primary Schools in Port Harcourt the Port Harcourt Primary School and the Sea Shell
Model Primary School which now form part of the College.
By 1980, following Governments proclamation of its intention to run degree
programmes in educational fields through Colleges of Education, the Rivers State Government
decided to sponsor the programme in order to increase the number of teachers in the State. Prof.
G.O.M. Tasie was appointed Provost of the College and was expected to upgrade the college to a
degree-awarding institution. He assumed duty on August 21st, 1980, being the date Mr. R.I.C.
Koko, former Provost of the College, handed over to him. During this period, Chief A.B. Batubo
was the Chairman of the Governing Council of the college. Following this appointment, the
1981/82 academic year witnessed the actual admission of candidates for degree programmes in
Rivers State College of Education. On May 28, 1982, the College happily matriculated the
pioneer students of the degree programme. By the end of the 1983/84 academic session, a total of
3,169 students had successfully passed through the various programmes of the College. Out of
this figure, 2,504 went through the NCE Programme, 531 passed through the ACE programme
and 134 in the B. Ed. programme.
On 1st September, 1984, Professor G.O.M. Tasie was re-appointed Provost by the Rivers
State Military Governor. Within this period, Prof. D.M.J. Fubara was the Chairman of the
Governing Council of the College. From 1984 to 1987, it was observed that Rivers State College
of Education made giant strides in the improvement of its structures, facilities, funding and
conditions of service, particularly by providing the Visual Arts Laboratory building and by the
construction of twin standard-size lawn tennis courts. Within the period 1984-88, the College
Management dealt with a lot of problems, which included:
i. the certificates of occupancy for two campuses, viz. Ndele and St. Johns Diobu campuses,
were collected;
ii. the fight for the adoption of the University Salary Structure (USS) in the College was started
and fought a long way; and
iii. the enactment by the Council of an effective statute on financial regulations of the college.
In January, 1988, the Military Governor of Rivers State approved the appointment of
Professor S.F. Amakiri as Provost of the College. In May of the same year, Prof. Isaac Dema was
appointed to head the Governing Council . From 1988 to 1991 Rivers State College of Education
achieved much, and some of its dreams were realised. Rivers State College of Education was the
first College of Education that started the scheme. The decision to convert Rivers State College
of Education into a university was taken in 2009 by the Rivers State Government in furtherance
of its desire to provide opportunities for high quality education for citizens of the State. Given
that the college had for a long time been awarding degrees in affiliation with the University of
Ibadan, the transition from a college of education to a university should be easy for the
institution. Further to this notion is the fact that many graduates of the defunct Rivers State
College of Education have been yearning to improve their academic qualifications through the
acquisition of university degrees, preferably within an environment they are used to. Given the
reasonably favourable financial situation of Rivers State, the Government considered it expedient
to establish the second State Government-owned university. Ignatius Ajuru University of
Education was established by the University of Education Law No. 8 of 2009 of the Rivers State
Government passed by the Rivers State House of Assembly on 15 October 2009 and assented to
by His Excellency, Chief Rotimi Amaechi, the Executive Governor of Rivers State on 20
October 2009.
There are many different training and development methods. On-the-job training,
informal training, classroom training, internal training courses, external training courses, on-thejob coaching, life-coaching, mentoring, training assignments and tasks, skills training, product
training, technical training, behavioural development training, role-playing and role play games
and exercises, attitudinal training and development, accredited training and career, distance
career - all part of the training menu, available to use and apply according to individual training
needs and organisational training needs.
Training is also available far beyond and outside the classroom. More importantly,
training - or career development, to look at it from the trainee's view - is anything offering career
and developmental experience. Training and career development includes aspects such as: ethics
and morality; attitude and behaviour; leadership and determination, as well as skills and
knowledge.
Development is not restricted to training - it's anything that helps a person to grow, in
ability, skills, confidence, tolerance, commitment, initiative, inter-personal skills, understanding,
self-control, motivation and more (Okoroma, 2010). If one considers the attributes of really
effective people, be they leaders, managers, operators, technicians; any role at all, the important
qualities which make good performers special are likely to be attitudinal. Skills and knowledge,
and the processes available to people, are no great advantage. What makes people effective and
valuable to any organization is their attitude.
Nnedu (2006:41) outlined the methods that can be used in Nigeria for human asset
development programmes as:
Videotape Recording: This method can be used to ethical and philosophical campaign geared
towards behavioural changes in organizations and even in society.
Role Playing: This technique can be used to train organizational members on the areas of public
relations and general understanding or human behaviour.
On-the Job Career development: This is a method that allows the workers to train on the job as
he/she performs his/her functions in the establishment.
Major Problems of Career and Human Capital Development
Personnel development/management in Nigeria is faced with certain peculiar problems,
some of which are:
Lack of Qualified Manpower
In Nigeria before and now, some skills are readily available and some are raised to come by
in the technical and technological field, which makes it difficult at times to attain the
required manpower mix. In order to correct the imbalance, the institutions to admit students
in the educational favour science related discipline. Also large organizations have had to
establish career development centers, so that required skills can be trained for internally
(Nwachukwu,2009).
State of Personnel Administrator
Personnel administrators are regarded as least important managers who are to be seen and not
heard. This resulted from the fact that the original parishioners were untrained, but this
altitude is gradually changing. Nowadays, personnel managers or directors now rise to the
board and enjoy comparable fringe benefits to those of their counterparts in other discipline.
10
Despite this, the fact that the output of the personnel department is non-tangible, the efforts
of parishioners are least appreciated until industrial disharmony occurs.
Lack of Facilities for Career development
Career development is a crucial aspect of the personnel function. However, career
development facilities are in short supply and large organizations have had to establish career
development centres of their own. And others use the services of management consultants who
organize career development programmes, example, seminars, symposium, conference, lectures,
etc, for administrative college of Nigeria also aid organization on area of manpower
development. Professional bodies such as the IPM, NIM, etc, also help. In some cases where the
required are available, the skilled trainers are not available.
Social Pressures
Personnel administrator come under seven social pressures and merit is often sacrificed
when recommitment of certain skills are not from his uncle, or his in-law or his boss. Under this
situation, it is difficult to carry out a systematic selection exercise and the use of test becomes
irrelevant.
Political Pressure
In Nigeria, the institution of federal character and quota system cannot be ignored. This is
to bridge the gap between educationally backward north and advanced south. However, this is
been abused to the disadvantage of the southern qualified candidates.
Environmental Constraint
Nigeria as an example consists of several dialects and many can only speak their dialect
and broken English. This makes it difficult to transfer some illiterates from their area to another
place, as they will find it difficult to accept changes (Ajuzie,2011).
Nigerian universities are founded to seek the truth through the development of
knowledge, and manpower personnel. They were founded also for the scientific and
technological advancement of society, as well as to its material and cultural development. Adams
(2007) said, "Educational systems were said to produce the skilled manpower and the new
knowledge requisite for technological advancement and economic growth" (p.299). Nigerian
universities must reorganize its fundamental role in shaping the human resources necessary for
societal development and its responsibility to help solve social and cultural problems. It should
recognize the universal value of debate for the development of humankind, science, art and
culture.
Market forces
Some of the market forces affecting Nigerian universities are Joint Admission and
Matriculation Board (JAMB), matching education to job demands, and infrastructure
inadequacies. The Joint Admission and Matriculation Board examinations have caused a concern
for both parents and candidates in Nigeria. Some candidates sit for the exam for years without
gaining admission to any university. These have lead to cheating or taking an unpopular career
course in order to gain admission.
Moja (2010) said "Access to higher education and the lack of the capacity of the system
to absorb the numbers of students seeking admission to higher education institutions continues to
pose a serious problem. For example, it is estimated that out of 400,000JAMB candidates
seeking admission to university education, more than 320,000, which is about 80% are not able
to gain admission to any of the 37 Nigerian universities"(p.30). Ajala, (2002) commented, "The
latest Joint Admission and Matriculation Board (JAMB) figures clearly show that the situation
has not improved in the real sense of the world. According to JAMB figures, out of about
800,000 candidates that sat for the 2005 examination, only 147,000 would be offered places in
the existing universities. This represents only 18.4 percent"(p.2).
Infrastructure Inadequacies
The infrastructure inadequacies in the Nigerian universities are another area that poses
hindrance to learning and research work. A good number of Nigerian universities are offering
technological education programs. The question is how many of these universities have the basic
infrastructure to run the program. For example, in most universities offering computer course,
students graduate without touching a computer. Ajala, (2002). said, "The death of infrastructure
in the public universities is sickening and runs short of an ideal academic environment" (p.2).
They cannot be confined to provide the human resource demands by the market. To do so would
be to limit the social relevance of higher education. The challenge to Nigerian universities is to
conduct the university's affairs in a way that is relevant to a historical moment gripped by rapid
change.
Faculty Exodus
Over the past decades, as a result of a gradual exodus of many of our most talented
faculty, Nigeria universities have seized to be a place for exciting search for innovation. Some
faculty abandoned academia for other sectors of the economy, where professionals and scientists
receive higher salaries and greater social recognition. Some emigrate for economic reasons,
while some fled because of political reasons. Okoroanyanwu, (2002) commented, "There was
mass exodus of many brilliant lecturers that could not compete on political campus arenas from
the university campus. Some left to join the rat race in the business world and others left Nigeria
for better services" (p.3). He further said, "that experienced and seasoned professors like the late
12
Awojobi were sidelined. The political professors often silenced the lone voices of active and
academic professors" (p.4). Ali (2009) said "That many experienced and young lecturers are
fleeing from the frustration of university life into more rewarding and more challenging sectors
of the economy and even to overseas countries" (p.3). The result of the faculty exodus is seen in
the quality of graduates that our university produces.
Money and Management
The growing and changing nature of higher education needs will trigger strong economic
forces. Already, the traditional source of funding -federal support has simply not kept pace with
the growing demand. This imbalance between demand and available resources is aggravated by
the increasing cost of higher education, driven as they are by the number of students seeking
admissions to the universities. The weakening influences of traditional source of funding are the
emergence of increased number of college age students seeking admission into the Nigerian
universities. The societal needs, economic realities and technology, are likely to drive a massive
restructuring of higher education enterprise. This will need a global knowledge and learning
industry, and the need for traditional institutions to converge with other knowledge-intensive
organizations such as information services, companies and telecommunications (Okoroma,
2010). Financial restrictions also create problems that obstruct academic work, causing friction
between the universities and the government, thus threatening the stability of institutions. The
problems are more visible in the areas of faculty salaries, libraries, equipments, research and
quality of students entering our universities today. Ajuzie (2011) said, "The existing orthodox
education in Nigeria seems to suffer from inadequate funding" (p.136). Levin (2004) said, "The
schools today are ill-equipped and teachers are poorly trained. Standard is falling in all
departments".
Socio / Political issues
There are also fiscally induced tensions that generate negative impact e.g.; cultic cases,
economic and political pressures. Olajire (2003) commented, "The tertiary institutions that are
established to promote intellectual excellence, good virtues etc; have deviated. We are faced
daily with reports of students caught in armed robbery, rape, assassination. The majority of these
institutions have misplaced their goals and allowed social, political factors of their environment
to create crises in their academic community. It is a known fact that tertiary institutions do not
get their entire approved annual budget" (p.6). All these and more threaten the academic
autonomy and stable academic calendar.
13
Research Methodology
This study is primarily aimed at examining the Role of Public Administration in
Human Capital Development in Public Organisations: A Survey of Tertiary
Educational Institutions in Rivers State.
Research Design
Quasi-experimental is descriptive in nature because it is channelled towards solving a
particular problem through an in-depth examination of topical issues inherent in the subject
matter. For this study, a cross sectional survey design is adopted. This is a system of measuring
and collecting data at a single point in time.
Study Population
The population of the study consists of the tertiary institutions in Nigeria. However,
specifically, we have drawn our population from 3 tertiary educational institutions in Rivers state
relying more on management staff and supervisors who are involved in leadership career
development practices in this sector. We have defined our population in relation to the 3 tertiary
educational institutions that are fully both the Federal and Rivers state government and is
distributed as follows:
University of Port Harcourt
3802 Staff
Rivers State University of Science and Technology
1870 Staff
Rivers State University of Education
1524 Staff
Total Population
7196 Staff
Sources: Universities and Colleges Data and Record, 2015
Sampling Procedure and Sample Size
The sample selection of the tertiary institutions recognized by our population definition has been
done randomly through probabilistic sampling techniques, involving stratification. The use of
stratification was mainly applied to the interviewed staff since all the three tertiary institutions
defined in our population through their staff were studied. The study adopted simple
random sampling techniques based on the population of the study as 7196
Staff, the sample size was determined through the use of Taro Yamanes
sample technique as follows:
n = N
1 + N(e)2
Where; n = Sample size
N = Population of the study
e = Level of significance @ 5%
Therefore sample size for the study is determined thus:
n=
7196
7196
2
1 + 7196 (0.05) = 1 + 17.99
= 378.93
7196
18.99
=
=
379
14
187
117
185
116
98.42%
98.31%
66
65
91.55%
370
366
98.92%
Table 1 shows that 190 copies of questionnaire were administered on the respondents
from the University of Port Harcourt, 187 copies of them were actually retrieved, while 185
copies of questionnaire were found relevant, and this represents 98.42% response rate of this
segment In Rivers State University of Science and Technology 118 copies of questionnaire were
administered on the respondents and 117 copies were retrieved while 116 copies of
questionnaire were found relevant, and this represents 98.31% response rate of this segment. For
the Rivers State University of Education 71 copies were administered on the staff, 66 copies of
questionnaire were collected from them and 65 copies i.e 91.55% response rate were found
useful. In all, the study administered 379 copies of questionnaire on the respondents from the
selected 3 tertiary institutions in Rivers State, while 370 copies of questionnaire were actually
retrieved from the respondents. However, after editing the copies of questionnaire only 366
copies representing (98.92% response rate) were found useful for the data analysis.
15
Percentage Response
30.6
23
26
15.5
4.9
55.7
38.3
6
15
29
37.2
18.8
11.2
28.7
13.7
34.4
12
59
41
100
Table 2 shows the demographic distribution of respondents. The age range of the
respondents was between 18 and 62 yr (33.624.21 years). Almost 80% of the
respondents were between 18 and 50 yr.. The single, married and widowed were 55.7%,
38.3% and 6.0% respectively. Only 15.0% of the respondents had G.C.E. /WASC
education. Most of the respondents were Middle Academic Staff (126, 34.4%) and this
was followed by Junior Non Academic Staff workers (105, 28.7%) which included
various forms of skills. The results indicated that marital status, educational status,
professional / work and experience level are some of the socio-demographic
characteristics of the respondents.
16
To what extent does public administration encourage effective human capital development
leading to good service delivery in the tertiary institutions in Nigeria?
2.
To what extent does public administration encourage effective human capital
development leading to the performance of the lecturers in the tertiary institutions in
Nigeria?
3.
To what extent does public administration encourage effective human capital
development that leads to the quality of students produced by the tertiary institutions in
Nigeria?
4.
To what extent does public administration encourage effective human capital
development in controlling of human resources for service delivery in the tertiary
institutions in Nigeria?
Table 3:
Table 4:
Options
Number of respondents
Percentage/Response
Table 5:
Evidence
Public
Administration
in
tertiary
educational
institutions
Score
Count
Score
300
1320
3.63
High
290
1293
3.55
High
420
1413
3.88
High
260
1223
3.36
Low
290
1248
3.43
Low
1560
2497
Very
Large
Large
Mode
-rate
Low
Very
Low
Presence
of
223
230
227
340
efficient human
capital
development
traits
Adequate
220
252
263
268
motivation of
subordinates
High level of
210
234
245
304
cooperation on
the part of the
leaders
Provision
of
248
238
245
232
finance
Sufficient
of
240
248
230
240
commitment on
the part of the
leaders/workers
Total
1141
1202
1210
1384
Source: Survey Data, 2015.
Likert Scale = 5 Points.
Decision Rule Cut off : 3.50 = High; < 3.50 = Low
.
The Extent to Which Efficient Public Administration Encourages Effective Human Capital
Development that Leads to the Quality of Students Produced by the Tertiary Institutions
in Nigeria
Table 6 and 7 show the extent to which public administration encourages effective human
capital development that leads to the quality of students produced by the tertiary institutions in
Nigeria.
Table 6: Whether public administration encourages effective human capital development that
leads to the quality of students produced by the tertiary institutions in Nigeria
Options
Number of Respondents
Percentage Response
Yes
193
53%
No
173
47%
Total
366
100%
Source: Survey Data, 2015
Table 6 shows that 53% of the respondents indicated Yes that public administration
encourage effective human capital development that leads to the quality of students produced by
the tertiary institutions in Nigeria. Also, 47% of the respondents indicated No to the question.
Table 7:
The Extent to Which public administration encourages effective human capital development in
controlling of human resources for service delivery in the tertiary institutions in Nigeria
20
Tables show that 8 and 9 show the extent to which public administration encourages
effective human capital development in controlling of human resources for service delivery in
the tertiary institutions in Nigeria.
Table 8:
Whether public administration encourages effective human capital development
in controlling of human resources for service delivery in the tertiary institutions in Nigeria
Options
Number of respondents
Percentage/Response
Yes
224
61%
No
142
39%
Total
106
100%
Source: Survey Data, 2015
Table 8 shows that 61% of the respondents indicated that public administration encourages
effective human capital development in controlling of human resources for service delivery in
the tertiary institutions in Nigeria while only 39% of the respondents indicated no to the
question.
Table 9:
21
Rating
345
338
98
92
1st
4th
349
314
342
304
300
290
95
86
93
83
82
79
2nd
6th
3rd
7th
8th
9th
338
325
325
92
89
89
4th
5th
5th
Table 10 shows major human capital development challenges faced by workers in tertiary
institutions. The first challenge or problem as indicated by 98% of the respondents is Lack of
due respect and recognition this is followed by Bottlenecks / bureaucracy, indicated by 95%
of the respondents. The third human capital development challenges identified by 93% of the
respondents are management and economic forces while the fourth human capital development
challenge as indicated by 92% of the respondents are: uncertainties underlying performance
evaluation and Female chauvinism and discrimination. Also the data in table 10 reveal that
89% of the respondents indicated financial / administrative problems and technical problems
as the 5th major human capital development challenges faced by workers in tertiary educational
institutions. The 6th leadership challenge identified by 86% of the respondents is Fraud /
corruption. Equally, changing Government policies have been identified by 83% of the
respondents as the 7th major human capital development challenge faced by workers in tertiary
institutions. The data show that Market forces are the 8th major leadership challenge as
indicated by 82% of the respondents. Finally, 79% of the respondents indicated that Inefficient
human capital development, social, cultural, and political problems are the 9th major human
capital development challenges faced by workers in tertiary institutions.
22
Test of Hypotheses
Having presented and analyzed the data generated for this, study this section is devoted
to testing of the three hypotheses formulated in the study. They have been tested using Pearsons
Product Moment Correction Coefficient ( r ) and t - test
Hypothesis I (Ho1): There is no significant relationship between public administration
encouraging effective human capital development and service delivery in the tertiary
institutions in Nigeria.
Table 11:
Statistical Relationship between public administration encouraging effective
human capital development and service delivery in the tertiary institutions in
Nigeria
Extent
of public
Service
Relationship
administration
delivery in
Between
the encouraging
the tertiary
Variables
effective
human institutions
capital development in Nigeria
(X)
(Y)
X2
Y2
XY
Very Large extent 97
93
9409 8649
9021
Large extent
73
73
5329 5329
5329
Moderate extent
79
86
6241 7396
6794
Low extent
66
62
4356 3844
4093
Very low extent
51
52
2601 2704
2652
Total
366
366
27,9 27,922
27,888
36
Source: Survey Data, 2015( See also tables 3 and 4 )
r =
0.96 (positive relationship)
t=
5.928 (computed) High level of significance
t crit @ 3;0.05 = 3.18
From the data in table 12 and the computation of the r value (which is 0.96) and t value
(which is 5.93); it is conclusive that the computed value of t is greater than the one obtained
from the table, which is 3.18. Therefore, the study has rejected the null hypothesis I and
accepted the alternate hypothesis I Hi1 which says There is significant relationship between
public administration encouraging effective human capital development and service delivery in
the tertiary institutions in Nigeria.
Hypothesis II (Ho2): There is no significant relationship between public administration
encouraging effective human capital development and the performance of the lecturers in the
tertiary institutions in Nigeria.
Table 12:
tertiary
23
The study has revealed that to a large extent efficient human capital development in the
tertiary institutions in Nigeria is a veritable ingredient for effective service delivery and
organisational success. Recognizing the important role of knowledge on task performance,
Gelleffilan, (2007:41) recommended three guidelines to follow when investigating career
development of workers. First, hypotheses should focus on the effects of specific knowledge
(content or organization) on performance. Second, in order to properly demonstrate a knowledge
difference or the effect of knowledge on performance, a researcher must use a task that clearly
delineates the difference of having or not having the requisite knowledge. Third, the presence of
a knowledge effect is best investigated by manipulating stimuli and/or context features and
comparing individuals with varying levels of service delivery in the tertiary institutions in
Nigeria. Adams, (2007:24) also commented on the methodological difficulties in career
development expertise research. They claimed these studies were characterized by a failure to
differentiate between the constructs service delivery in the tertiary institutions in Nigeria and
expertise as well as a lack of a well defined research question. Like Adams, (2007:25) he put
forth four prescriptions for career development / leadership challenges research in institutions.
In the cue weighting task participants were presented with five cues and asked to make a
control or analytical procedure risk judgment on a 9 point scale with endpoints labelled low risk
and high risk. As expected, the presence of task-specific knowledge resulted in improved
performance when selecting and weighting cues in the analytical risk assessment task. In the late
eighties and early nineties research on career development of workers in institutions were
documented. In general, these studies found that career development of workers resulted in taskspecific knowledge which often leads to superior performance. The authors assert that different
types of career development create knowledge structures and these knowledge structures will
influence the problem representation of a resource allocation task. The theoretical underpinnings
of task-specific service delivery in the tertiary institutions in Nigeria, as revealed by the study are
a related knowledge base, and the resulting superior performance is generalizable to other
settings. In fact, a relationship between service delivery in the tertiary institutions in Nigeria and
performance has been established by the study. The study has found that service delivery in the
tertiary institutions in Nigeria plays significant role towards effective decisions- leading to the
growth of the organisation. The study found that in the Nigerian Organisation today, there is a
lack of performance oriented leadership, which promotes target setting as well as proper
performance evaluation. Besides, there is a poor data and career development culture, which
allows for system leakage and corruption. This situation necessitates the need to develop models
for effective control and performance evaluation criteria. From the study we have found that
Performance measurement is a valuable exercise not least because it provides an opportunity and
a framework for asking fundamental question such as what are you trying to achieve. What does
"success" look like? How will you know if or when you've achieved it? As Baird (2004:29) said:
"No organisation can afford to overlook the importance of clearly defining its objectives and
priorities, assessing performance against well-defined benchmarks, and changing the
bureaucratic culture into one that stresses client service and achievement of results rather than an
imposed requirement of donor agencies, evaluation now becomes a key instrument of good
governance and institutional development within the country. We all have responsibility to make
sure this function is nurtured and supported.
An assessment of the human capital development challenges in the organisation leaves
much to be desired. The practice today is that a certain percentage is added to previous period's
26
career development to arrive at current career development figures without reference to the
environmental inhibitions being encountered or the realities of present day situation. The career
developments are centrally prepared and the result passed down the line for all and sundry to
implement without questions. Efficient human capital development and implementation can
facilitate important group practice activities, including, strategic planning, quality improvement,
and managed care contracting. Managers use effective career development of subordinates to aid
in planning and controlling their organisations.
Conclusion
Public administration is a veritable mechanism to achieve development objectives of
government/public related organisation. In the same vein human capital development/ career
development are essential ingredients for enhancement of the resource of an organization or a
tertiary educational institution to attain its desired goals. Dearth of good and efficient human
capital development in all spheres of human endeavours could be said to be the main clog in any
societal development.
From the test of the hypotheses, it is evident and conclusive that: There is significant
relationship between the efficient human capital development in the university and career
development of workers in tertiary educational institutions; there is significant relationship
between the efficient human capital development and career development of workers in tertiary
educational institutions; there is significant relationship between the efficient human capital
development in the university and career development of workers in tertiary educational
institutions and there is significant relationship between the controlling of educational resources
and service delivery in the tertiary institutions in Nigeria.
Recommendations
Based on the findings and the conclusion reached, the following recommendations have
been made:
(1) For the tertiary institutions to successfully cope with the challenges confronting them and
make meaningful contributions in human capital development, the country needs an
education-friendly government, a civilized tertiary educational institutions and public
sector that is ready and willing to invest in university education and give recognition to
those who have chosen the path of knowledge industry.
(2) There is also the need for those in the tertiary institutions to put their houses in order, so
that they would be encouraged to join hands with tertiary educational institutions in
confronting the challenges of the 21st century more especially with respect to human
capital development.
(3) It is imperative that the most sustainable way of meeting national objectives for
international integration and prosperity is to invest in Nigerians through higher education,
and the best starting point is through genuine reform of the underpinning policy systems
constraining the tertiary institutions more especially in career development of workers.
(4) Human Resources should be made to be accountable for their stewardships both when in
office/work place and after wards, through legislative or any possible means.
(5) Professionals and mass media should form vanguards that would serve as watch-dogs or
whistle blowers to curtail the excesses of the leadership in developing the human capital.
27
(6) Role model should be set in our spheres of human endeavour. Human resources should be
sincere and selfless in their various fields of endeavour so that their organisations can
achieve set objectives.
References
Achimugu, H. (2011). An assessment of the contributions of e-government to overcoming
the challenges of local government performance in Ofu local government area An
unpublished PhD seminar of the Department of Public Administration Kogi
State
University Anyigba-Nigeria
Adams, D.K (2007). Development Education. Comparative Education Review.
&3 June/ October; pp.296-310
Vol.21 No.2
28
Chicago,
29
APPENDIX A:
Table 11B:
5484
5724 x 5654
= 5484
5688.89
0.9539
r = 0.96
Testing for level of significance t
t = r
n-2
1 (r)2
t
= 0.96
52
1 (0.95)
= 1.66
0.28
30
= 5.93
t = 5.93
(High level of significance)
APPENDIX B:
Table 12B:
299.1
316.85
0.944
1-r2
=
n( x y)
(x)( y)
2
2
2
2
[n(x ) (x) ] [ny ) (y) ]
5(23254.11) - (17.85)( 6497)
5(63.8883) (17.85)2] [5(8464051) (6497)2]
299.1
(0.919) (109246)
= 0.944
r n-2
0.944
5-2
1-(0.944)2
31
1.6351
0.1088
1.6351
0.3298
4.96
t
=
4.96
APPENDIX C:
Table 13B:
0.92
52
1 (0.92)
= 1.593
0.39
= 4.085
t
= 4.085
(High level of significance)
APPENDIX D:
Table 14B:
encouraging effective
resources for service
Y2
10816
6241
6889
3481
1681
29,108
XY
10088
5767
6557
3804
2091
28,397
33
= 0.98
52
1 (0.98) 2
= 1.697
0.199
= 8.527
t
= 8/53
(High level of significance)
34