Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
developed and refined by science teachers as they honed their teaching and learning skills.
Additionally, students develop these same powerful strategies of inquiry as they learn through
this discovery approach.
Inquiry-based learning promotes a process of educational discovery. They are
meant to discover issues, encourage participants to ask meaningful questions, and decide how
to answer those questions. Research shows that an inquiry approach in teaching science
motivates and engages every type of student, helping them understand science's relevance to
life, as well as the nature of science itself.
Elements of the 5E Model can be traced back to the works of Johann
Herbart in the early 20th century. His work was based on using students
prior experiences, as well as their current knowledge, which is evident in
the engagement phase. Further, elements of John Deweys teaching
models can be mirrored in the elaboration and evaluation phases. The
model started in the 1960s with three phases (i.e., exploration, invention,
and discovery). Afterwards, engagement and evaluation are added
respectively. According to Bybee et al.,(2006), the model has been used in
biology and integrated science programs way back 1980s.
The following sections discusses on a brief description of each of the
five sequential phases of the 5E Model.
The engagement phase of the 5E Model involves eliciting the students attention to the
tasks, concepts, or skills included in the given lesson. The instructors or lessons focal point
should connect the new lesson with students prior knowledge, while also providing activities
that stimulate the interest of students and bring forth learner engagement.
The exploration phase typically involves providing students with a common set of
activities in order to encourage them to focus energies on the identification and development
of various concepts, processes, and skills. The instructor facilitates the process and creates a
challenging, learning-enriched environment. Further, the instructor encourages the students to
explore this environment with confidence and without apprehension. Problem solving is
promoted and students approach lesson plans as opportunities for growth.
The explanation phase of the 5E Model provides an opportunity for learners to exhibit
their knowledge of the concepts, processes, and skills acquired in the engagement and
exploration phases. Students may access prior knowledge and previous learning experiences,
those which include what has taken place in the engagement and exploration phases, thus, can
explain or illustrate their understanding of a given concept or skill. As the students leave this
phase, it has to be ensured that a profound understanding of the concepts, processes, and
skills covered is the key outcome.
The elaboration phase shows that the learning that has taken place
during the first three phases is expanded upon. Students are challenged
with new experiences and opportunities that provide further
understanding of concepts, processes, and skills to the learners.
Facilitation of this stage brings down opportunities and activities, as well
as ample explanation that serve to elaborate on the students existing
knowledge and skills. Accordingly, students are expected to develop a
broad and deep understanding of important concepts and skills through
additional experiences and activities.
The final phase in the 5E Model is evaluation. This phase refers to engaging the
students in self-assessments of their learning, of their understanding of important concepts,
and of their development of relevant skills. The learning that took place during the
engagement, exploration, explanation, and elaboration phases are assessed. Guidance to the
evaluative thought processes of the students, as well as endowing with their own evaluative
feedback materializes this phase.
Considering these prerequisites of utilizing 5Es approach in spite of lack or resources,
this poses a challenge to someone who wears the shoes of a teacher. However, the progress of
a country depends upon the quality of its young citizens. One of the numerous ways to gauge
pupil performance is the National Achievement Test. Relatively, the NAT performance of the
pupils at Salong Elementary School, Science subject, in particular, may seemly be not very
satisfactory and for this reason, the researcher is eager to conduct this particular study.
Being one of the numerous Science teachers in the public school, this challenge makes her
directly concerned.
Theoretical and Conceptual Framework
Teachers are an essential link in the transmission of educational opportunity to poor
children. Teacher commitment may also be an important factor determining the successful
implementation of educational reforms in schools.
Self-interest and motivation possessed by teacher is necessary in the successful
implementation of the 5Es approach in teaching Science in schools. Using this model,
learners are actively engaged in the teaching-learning process. The five successive phases
comprise an instructional sequence that encourages students to work through problem-solving
situations. Through this, a useful framework for designing, developing, and implementing
lesson plans and curriculum materials will be offered.
Keeping learners engaged to discussions has never been an easy job. By means of
providing varied activities, a teacher holds the opportunities to have control over the pupils
against time. Discovery by themselves will likewise lead them to understand concepts,
themselves.
However, mastery over these strategies may cause a heavy yoke to teachers,
particularly those who are neophytes. Certain factors in relation to this may affect a teachers
motivation toward work performance, and capabilities of extending knowledge to children.
Hence the following conceptual paradigm has been designed with reference to this study.
INPUT
PROCESS
OUTPUT
Higher Level of
Demographic profile
Assessment of the
a. age
Understanding
b. length of service
Leading to Above-
c. grade level
average Performance
School as Utilized by
of pupils in Science
being taught
d. work load
e. degree earned
Five Successive
Phases in Using 5Es
Model / Approach
Science teachers at
Salong Elementary
School, Calaca District.
subject of NAT
Strengthened and
deepened work
motivation and
a. Engage
eagerness of Science
b. Explore
teachers at Salong
c. Explain
Elementary School,
d. Elaborate
Calaca District
e. Evaluate
NAT Results
FEEDBACK
Figure 1
Conceptual Paradigm of the Study
Hypothesis
There is no significant relationship between the utilization of 5Es approach and its
effects to the National Achievement Test, Science subject performance of the pupils at
Salong Elementary School, Calaca District, Division of Batangas, during the school year
2013-2014.
Significance of the Study
Definition of Terms
The following terms are hereby operationally defined for clarification
purposes.
Achievement
5Es Approach -
Science Teachers - In this study, they are referred as science teachers in Sallong Elementary
School, Calaca District who delivers instruction in 5Es approach.
Work Motivation
NAT performance -as used in this study, it deals with the performance of the Grade six
pupils at Salong Elementary School in the National Achievement Test.
Chapter 3
RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES
This chapter presents the methods used in the investigation of the respondents and the
questionnaire and its description as instrument utilized in gathering data.
Research Design
This study will make use of the descriptive type of research as it attempts to describe
what are and to what extent is the effectiveness of 5Es approach as used by the
respondents.
Respondents of the Study
The respondents of this study will be consisted of all the Science teachers at Salong
Elementary School, Calaca District, Division of Batangas, during the school year 2013-2014.
Research Instrument
The questionnaire will be utilized as the major tool in gathering the data needed in
accomplishing this research.
Scoring Procedure
The following scale with the corresponding description or interpretation will be used.
Weight
Ranges
5.0
Description
Highly Effective
4.0 4.9
Moderately Effective
3.0 3.9
Fairly Effective
2.0 2.9
Lowly Effective
1.0 1.9
Ineffective
Chapter 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
This chapter presents the research literature and studies, both foreign and
local, relevant to the development of the present study.
Foreign and Local Literature
The 5E Instructional Model, developed by the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study,
provides a useful framework for designing, developing, and implementing lesson plans and
curriculum materials. Further, it is well grounded in the research of instructional theorists and
provides a framework for which to build knowledge and skills in the next generation of
problem solvers. 5E Model has five successive phases with unique instructional emphases:
engagement, exploration, explanation, elaboration, and evaluation. Together, these five
phases comprise an instructional sequence that encourages students to work through problemsolving situations as actively engaged learners. This model provides a useful framework for
designing, developing, and implementing lesson plans and curriculum materials. (Nielsen,
2011).
The 5 E's model is based on the constructivist approach to learning, which states that
learners construct new ideas on top of their schema. The 5 E's can be used with students of all
ages, even adults. Each of the 5 E's describes a phase of learning, which begins with the letter
"E": Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, and Evaluate. The 5 E's allows students and
teachers to experience common activities, to use and build on prior knowledge and
. Regarding research results from Pakistan Journal of Sciences (2009), the possible
factors to learner achievement include: the style of teaching learning cycle which concern
about improving students intelligence using flame work from Piagets development theory
about the assimilation, accommodation and organization use that exploration phase,
explanation phase and expansion phase, respectively. It makes the students adapt themselves.
On the other hand, inquiry learning is an approach which helps students to create knowledge
streamlining by using their own thought, the learning activities which encourage students
using science process skills (intellectual abilities) by the use of basic and integrate science
process skills, such as observation, measurement, calculation, collecting and interpreting data
that could increase students abilities if they practice consistently. These techniques are
associated with law of exercise and during learning activity the students were using the 5Eslearning cycle approach which aids learners to link them to learning, knowledge and thinking.
These concepts are mentioned in the social constructivism theory which takes an important
part in term of improving learners to have an opportunity to share their ideas, argument,
critique between the groups in order to get consensus for new knowledge (Hogan, It opens
students to conceptual change, durability, connection development, higher-ordered thinking
and self determination, which help them to develop shown gains in learning achievement
through integrated science process skill and critical thinking appropriately.
As mirrored in The Connecting Link (2010), this approach deals with designing
inquiry-oriented science lessons and implementation. Classrooms are designed to facilitate
inquiry, such as centers, grouping, discipline and safety issues. Participants will look at the
phases of implementing a learning activity such as through reading and video case study.
Teacher/student preparation, pre-activity teacher/ student discussion, distribution and
collection of science materials, beginning the activity, during the activity, after the activity is
involved. It promotes integration of science with other subjects.
Foreign Studies
According to Bybee, et.al, (2006), 5E model typically involves providing students
with a common set of activities in order to encourage them to focus energies on the
identification and development of various concepts, processes, and skills. The instructor
facilitates the process and creates a challenging, learning-enriched environment.
However, as evident in the result of the study by Taylor et.al, (2007), it is interesting
to speculate about why extensive use of the 5Es did not yield student achievement that shows
a significant difference from basic use of the instructional model. It opens the possibility that
the instructional materials, which make the 5Es explicit for both teachers and students, are
fidelity-resilient (within limits). That means that even when a teacher implements the material
with only medium fidelity or dependability on 5E model, the inherent design of the
instructional materials likely contributes to enhanced understanding and thus achievement for
students.
These studies reveal that there is a relationship with the use of 5Es approach by a
teacher in teaching Science in improving pupil achievement. Furthermore, the scientific
creativity and resourcefulness of a Science teacher and personal involvement of the learners
add a bonus point to more comprehensive teaching-learning process.
Though eagerly looking forward to more researches and studies that have relevance to
the present study, the researcher had found few nevertheless content-substantial ones.
SUMMARY
The 5Es approach exhibits the use of constructivism which is a learning strategy that
draws on students' existing knowledge, beliefs, and skills. With a constructivist approach,
learners can synthesize new understanding from prior learning and new information.
This study is intended to determine the effects of implementing 5Es approach in
teaching Science and find out if it has a relationship with the degree of performance in the
National Achievement Test of the Grade VI pupils at Salong Elementary School, Calaca
District. In view of the results which this study may direct to, the researcher is willing to use
the research itself as a tool to administer improvements in teaching skills as necessary and
turn out to better and more extensive performance of the pupils.
REFERENCES
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., &
Landes, N. (2006) The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, Effectiveness,
and Applications. Executive Summary. Retrieved March 30, 2010 from
http://www.bscs.org/curriculumdevelopment/features/bscs5es.
Appamaraka S., Suksringarm P. and Singseewo A. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences,
2009, Volume 6, Issue 5, Page no. 287-291
Taylor J. A, Van Scotter P., Coulson D., Bridging Research on Learning and Student
Achievement: The Role of Instructional Materials, 2007
Nielsen C. P. Using the 5E Instructional Model to View Geospatial Technology Use in K12
Classrooms; Meridian K12 School Computer Technologies Journal Volume 13, Issue 2, 2011
Corporation for Public Broadcasting, The 5Es. 2002
www.google.com