NAME: MAHUMAPELO B.

SOFTWARE
ENGINEERING
LECTURE: MRS MAVETERA C
ASSIGNMENT TWO (INYM
615)

Contents
1.

Differences and similarities among types of methodologies................................................2

2. Advantages of using methodologies...................................................................................... 2

Better end product.................................................................................................................. 2
Better development................................................................................................................ 2
Institutionalizing procedures and methods.............................................................................3
Supporting device................................................................................................................... 3
3. Examples of real life systems that can be developed using SDMs.........................3
4. Differences between....evolutionary development, prototyping, RAD and Agile development.
3
Evolutionary system................................................................................................................ 3
Prototyping.............................................................................................................................. 4
Few stages in the Prototyping Model....................................................................................... 4
RAD......................................................................................................................................... 4
Agile........................................................................................................................................ 5
Highlighting things used for:................................................................................................ 5
5. Modelling themes............................................................................................................ 6
Process modelling................................................................................................................ 6
RU process model................................................................................................................ 6
Data modelling..................................................................................................................... 6
6. User participation................................................................................................................... 6
7. References............................................................................................................................. 7

1. Differences and similarities among types of methodologies

SDM

Approach

Philosophy

Model

TOOL

Process
Oriented

Hard

Paradigm Science
Objective-computerized
IS building

DFD

Use to a great

STRADIS

extent

Domain Problem
solving method.

Support to
strategy
Recommends
use of
strategy at
initial stage,
but does not
emphasise

Practice
Commercial

Advantage/disadvantage
1.

Target Any size of

Object
Oriented

Hard

RUP

Rapid
Development

Hard

XP

System.
Paradigm - Science
Objective computerized IS
building
Domain -problem
solving method
Target -Big system
Paradigm - Science
Objectivecomputerized IS
building
Domain - problem
solving method

object

Complexity

Include fuzzy

model

and time

aspects on

Academic

strategy

prototype
driven

Recommend
use of specific
tools and
techniques

Include fuzzy

Complexity

Recommends
use of
strategy at
initial stage,
but does not
emphasise

Commercial

aspects on
strategy

Target Small/ medium

Blended

Hard

IE

systems
Paradigm - Science
Objectivecomputerized IS
building

ERD

Domain IS

and time

Commercial

organizational need.
Target big systems

2. Advantages of using methodologies

Better end product
System development methodology (SDMs) are seen to be an endeavour to enhance the
nature of the final result of the data frameworks improvement process.

Better development
System development methodologies are likewise useful in the improvement of a data
framework in that they include certain sorts of instruments, for example, CASE devices,
word-handling, spreadsheets, realistic apparatuses, presentation programming and
graphing devices. Subsequently, devices tend to facilitate the task improvement.

Institutionalizing procedures and methods

Commonly, strategies involve the standard procedures that guide venture administrators in
accomplishing the objectives of the undertaking. Regardless, the utilization of frameworks
advancement techniques contrasts starting with one association then onto the next; thus, it
is basic to recognize how associations feel about the selection of a frameworks
improvement system.

Supporting device
A system development methodology is esteemed to be a standout amongst the most vital
supporting apparatuses to accomplish confused practices that consent to the prelude of
data frameworks advancement

3. Examples of real life systems that can be developed using SDMs

Obamacare - HealthCare.gov-

4. Differences between
Agile development.

evolutionary development, prototyping, RAD and

Evolutionary system
Is arranged on incremental methodology that intermittently conveys a framework that is
progressively finished. Transformative improvement is viewed as exceptionally fitting for
circumstances where necessities are hard to find ahead of time or where the framework is
especially intricate. Real accentuation of transformative advancement is that progressions
additional time are normal for as a major aspect of the incremental improvement The principal
execution is not seen as the fundamental goal but rather as a component of the proceeding with
development and change of the framework until an ideal answer for the first issue or prerequisites
is accomplished. Every conveyance accomplishes something helpful and usable yet is not as a
matter of course finish with the experience and learning picked up, a second emphasis of the
framework is started with overhauled and refined necessities.

Prototyping
It includes the advancement of a data framework with the guide of programming apparatuses. It
includes engineers to outline and assemble a downsized utilitarian model of the craved framework
and after that the designers show the working model to the clients and by utilizing prototyping,
zones, clients and experts analyse ranges of uncertain prerequisites. The significant accentuation
with prototyping tending to client disappointment found when utilizing the customary way to deal
with IS advancement. . Programming tolls significantly decrease the expenses and accelerates the
procedure of building up a model

Few stages in the Prototyping Model.

The new framework prerequisites are characterized in however much detail as could be
expected. This ordinarily includes meeting various clients speaking to every one of the
offices or parts of the current framework.
A preparatory outline is made for the new framework.
A first model of the new framework is built from the preparatory outline. This is normally a
downsized framework, and speaks to an estimation of the attributes of the last item.
The clients altogether assess the primary model, taking note of its qualities and
shortcomings, what should be included, and what ought to be expelled. The engineer
gathers and dissects the comments from the clients.
The primary model is changed, taking into account the remarks supplied by the clients, and
a second model of the new framework is built. The second model is assessed in the same
way similar to the primary model.
The previous steps are iterated the same number of times as fundamental, until the clients
are fulfilled that the model speaks to the last item coveted.
The last framework is developed, in light of the last model.
The last framework is altogether assessed and tried. Routine support is completed on a
proceeding with premise to forestall expansive scale disappointments and to minimize
downtime.

RAD
The system to be produced is isolated into parts that are created independently. In RAD assets
and time are viewed as altered, and just the usefulness is variable. The quick conveyance of the
most vital necessities constructs validity and eagerness from the client and the business through
abnormal state interest shape every one of the partners in the project. Prototyping is the vital piece
of RAD and it is utilized to set up the client requirements. RAD was created as a response to the
issue of conventional advancement specifically with issue of lead times. It likewise addresses the
issue connected with changing and advancing necessities amid the advancement process
The stages in the rapid application improvement (RAD) model are:
Business modelling: The data stream is distinguished between different business
capacities.
Data modelling: Information assembled from business demonstrating is utilized to
characterize information questions that are required for the business.
Process modelling: Data objects characterized in information demonstrating are changed
over to accomplish the business data stream to accomplish some particular business
objective. Depiction are distinguished and made for CRUD of information items.
Application generation: Automated instruments are utilized to change over procedure
models into code and the genuine framework.
Testing and turnover: Test new segments and all the interface

Agile
Joint effort and correspondence between individuals is the key component to delivering working
framework rapidly in agile development. The nimble school of thought expresses that necessities
are troublesome for clients and that frequently can't verbalize or characterize them in points of
interest. Since the necessities are so hard to characterize, they should be advanced somehow.
This in accomplished by embracing a transformative approach together with prototyping. Agile
methodologies are found to contain general talk values. The qualities can be deciphered as an
attention on human part and connections of designers rather than the more process and
procedures centre of conventional philosophies.
Highlighting things used for:
You are taking an agile approach to development in general.
You plan to work iteratively and incrementally.
The requirements are uncertain or volatile.
The primary goal is to develop software.
The active stakeholders are supportive and involved.
The development team is in control of its destiny.
The developers are responsible and motivated.
Adequate resources are available for the project.
In conclusion I would say the methodologies I have examined have a few things in like manner.
Since they all comprises of their own particular qualities. The implementers in any case have
much freedom in terms of thoroughness and tool use.

5. Modelling themes
Process modelling

RU process model

Data modelling

6. User participation
a) Since the second philosophical perspective of ethics methodology is client interest and it
cannot builds improvement time, prompts wasteful application and makes her occupation
less satisfying. Since this includes all the influenced individuals in the rising framework, to
be specific immediate and backhanded clients, top supervisors, group directors, suppliers,
clients, designers, et cetera. Support for the most part incorporates the setting up of guiding
councils and an outline gathering or gatherings. The assignment of a controlling council
includes the setting up of rules for the outline gathering, and this prompts the advancement
of the new framework that constitutes decision of equipment and programming, human-PC
association, work environment redesign and allotment of obligation.
b)

7. References
"What Is RAD Model- Advantages, Disadvantages And When To Use It?".
Istqbexamcertification.com. N.P., 2016. Web. 22 Apr. 2016.
N.P., 2016. Web. 22 Apr. 2016.
Nemeth, A. (2006) Agile Modelling in Software Engineering. Available at:
http://www14.in.tum.de/konferenzen/Jass06/courses/3/presentations/AgileModeling.pdf
(Accessed: 22 April 2016).
In-line Citation:
(Nemeth, 2006)
What Is RAD Model- Advantages, Disadvantages And When To Use It.
Istqbexamcertification.com. N.P., 2016. Web. 22 Apr. 2016.
Dspace.nwu.ac.za. N.P., 2016. Web. 22 Apr. 2016.