Sunteți pe pagina 1din 90

Crash Analysis

Criteria Description
Version 1.6.2
Crash Analysis Criteria
Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup
Version 1.6.2

Arbeitskreis
Messdatenverarbeitung
Fahrzeugsicherheit

April 2005 edition


Subject to changes

rt

Measured data processing vehicle safety workgroup, Algorithm workgroup:


D. Cichos, bast; D. de Vogel, Ford; M. Otto, TV Rheinland; O. Schaar, Delphi; S. Zlsch, National Instruments,
in cooperation with the Task Force ISO TS 13499 (ISO-MME)
This documentation is available from the following address:
Bundesanstalt fr Straenwesen, Brderstrae 53,D-51427 Bergisch Gladbach,
Tel.: +49 (0)2204 / 43624, Fax: +49 (0)2204 / 43687
This documentation has been compiled with the greatest care. We are grateful for information about errors, new
methods, and new laws. We do not accept liability for incorrect information.
1995-2005 Workgroup Data Processing Vehicle Safety. All Rights Reserved.

Contents
For a clear presentation of the criteria used to evaluate crash tests, the criteria are briefly summarized
below.
First, there is a description of the criterion. Then the mathematical calculation is specified. This is
followed by a description of how the individual input values are determined (filtered). Then
information about the laws and stipulations relating to the algorithm.
All the descriptions are based on SAE J1733-conform signal polarity (sign
convention).

Note

The following criteria are described:

Chapter 1
Description of the Head Criteria
HIC.................................................................................................................................1-2
HAC ...............................................................................................................................1-4
HIC(d) ............................................................................................................................1-5
HPC................................................................................................................................1-6
HCD ...............................................................................................................................1-8

Chapter 2
Description of the Neck Criteria
MOC ..............................................................................................................................2-2
MTO...............................................................................................................................2-5
Time At Level ...............................................................................................................2-8
NIC (front impact ECE).................................................................................................2-10
NIC (front impact EuroNCAP)......................................................................................2-12
NIC (front impact FMVSS) ...........................................................................................2-15
Nij ..................................................................................................................................2-16
NIC (rear impact)...........................................................................................................2-19
Nkm ...............................................................................................................................2-21
LNL................................................................................................................................2-23

Chapter 3
Description of the Chest Criteria
VC ..................................................................................................................................3-2
THPC .............................................................................................................................3-5
TTI(d).............................................................................................................................3-6

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

iii

Contents

ThAC ............................................................................................................................. 3-8


CTI................................................................................................................................. 3-9
ThCC (or TCC).............................................................................................................. 3-11
RDC............................................................................................................................... 3-12

Chapter 4
Description of the Criteria for the Lower Extremities
APF................................................................................................................................ 4-2
PSPF .............................................................................................................................. 4-3
FFC (ECE)..................................................................................................................... 4-4
FFC (EuroNCAP).......................................................................................................... 4-6
TI ................................................................................................................................... 4-8
TCFC ............................................................................................................................. 4-12

Chapter 5
Description of Additional Criteria
Xms................................................................................................................................ 5-2
Xg .................................................................................................................................. 5-6
Acomp ........................................................................................................................... 5-7
Pulse Test....................................................................................................................... 5-9
Gillis Index .................................................................................................................... 5-13
NCAP ............................................................................................................................ 5-15
EuroNCAP..................................................................................................................... 5-17
SI.................................................................................................................................... 5-18
Integration...................................................................................................................... 5-19
Differentiation ............................................................................................................... 5-20
CFC filters ..................................................................................................................... 5-21
FIR100 filter .................................................................................................................. 5-24

Chapter 6
Legislation and Directives
The legislation and directives are written as follows: ................................................... 6-1
Limits............................................................................................................................. 6-3

iv

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Description of the Head Criteria

The following head criteria are described in this chapter:

HIC:

Head Injury Criterion

HAC:

Head Acceptability Criterion

HIC(d):

Performance Criterion

HPC:

Head Performance Criterion

HCD:

Head Contact Duration

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

1-1

Chapter 1

Description of the Head Criteria

HIC
HIC is the abbreviation for Head Injury Criterion.

Description
The HIC value is the standardized maximum integral value of the head
acceleration. The length of the corresponding time interval is:

unlimited

HIC

maximum of 36 ms

HIC36

maximum of 15 ms

HIC15

Mathematical Calculation
The calculation of the HIC value is based on the equation:

HIC = sup t

a =

1,

t2

t2

1
- a dt
------------ t2 t1
t1

ax + ay + az

2, 5

( t2 t1 )

a is the resultant acceleration of the center of gravity of the head in units of


acceleration of gravity (g = 9,81 m/s). t1 and t2 are the points in time during
the crash, for which the HIC is at a maximum. Measured times are to be
specified in seconds.

Determining Input Values


The measured values for head acceleration (ax, ay, az) are filtered in
accordance with CFC1000 (cf. CFC filters).
To define the input values in accordance with ECE-R80, the measured
values for head acceleration (ax, ay, az) are filtered in accordance with
CFC600 (cf. CFC filters).

1-2

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 1

Description of the Head Criteria

Relevant Laws and Regulations

FMVSS 208, S6.2


SAE J2052, 2.2.1
SAE J1727,3.6
ISO/TC22/SC12/WG3 N 282 Issued 1990-03-16
ADR69/00, 5.3.1
ECE-R80, Annex 4, 1
ECE-R22, 7.3.2.5
EuroNCAP, Front Impact, 10, 10.1
EuroNCAP, Side Impact, 10, 10.1
EuroNCAP, Pole Side Impact, 10, 10.1
EuroNCAP, Assessment Protocol, 5
EuroNCAP, Pedestrian Testing Protocol, 10.2.3.4

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

1-3

Chapter 1

Description of the Head Criteria

HAC
HAC is the abbreviation for Head Acceptability Criterion
Caution

This calculation regulation is obsolete. In the current ECE-R80 the HIC is used

instead.

Description
The HAC value is the standardized maximum integral value of the head
acceleration.

Mathematical Calculation
The calculation of the HAC value is based on the equation:

HAC = sup t

1,

t2

a =

t2

1
- a dt
------------t

t
2
1

t1

ax + ay + az

2, 5

( t2 t1 )

a is the resultant acceleration of the center of gravity of the head in units of


acceleration of gravity (g = 9,81 m/s). t1 and t2 are the points in time during
the crash, for which the HAC is at a maximum. Measured times are to be
specified in seconds.

Determining Input Values


The measured values for head acceleration (ax, ay, az) are filtered in
accordance with CFC600 (cf. CFC filters).

Relevant Laws and Regulations


ECE-R80, 5.2.2.1.1
ECE-R80, Annex 7, 1.1

1-4

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 1

Description of the Head Criteria

HIC(d)
HIC(d) is the Performance Criterion

Description
The HIC(d) value is the weighted standardized maximum integral value of
the head acceleration and is calculated from the HIC36 value.

Mathematical Calculation
The calculation of the HPC(d) value is based on the equation:

HIC ( d ) = 0, 75446 HIC36 + 166, 4


with
HIC36:

HIC36 value (cf. HIC)

Determining Input Values


The measured values for head acceleration (ax, ay, az) are filtered in
accordance with CFC1000 (cf. CFC filters).

Relevant Laws and Regulations


FMVSS 201, S7
NHTSA 49 CFR 571[Docket No. 92-28; Notice8],
[RIN No. 2127-AG07]; S7

NHTSA 49 CFR 571,572,589[Docket No. 92-28; Notice7],


[RIN No. 2127-AB85]; S7

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

1-5

Chapter 1

Description of the Head Criteria

HPC
HPC is the abbreviation for Head Performance Criterion (criterion for the
head strain).

Description
The HPC value is the standardized maximum integral value of the head
acceleration. The corresponding time interval is a maximum of 36 ms
(HPC36).
The HPC value is identical to the HIC value.

Mathematical Calculation
The calculation of the HPC value is based on the equation:

HPC = sup t

a =

1,

t2

t2

1
- a dt
------------t

t
2
1

t1

ax + ay + az

2, 5

( t2 t1 )

a is the resultant acceleration a of the center of gravity of the head in units


of acceleration of gravity (1 g =9,81 m/s).
If there was no head contact, this criterion is fulfilled.
If the beginning of the head contact can be determined satisfactorily, t 1 and
t 2 are the two time points, specified in seconds, which define a period
between the beginning of the head contact and the end of the recording, at
which the HPC36 is at its maximum.
If the beginning of the head contact cannot be determined satisfactorily, t1
and t2 are the two time points, expressed in seconds, which define a period
between the beginning of the head contact and the end of the recording, at
which the HPC36 is at its maximum.

1-6

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 1

Description of the Head Criteria

Determining Input Values


The measured values for head acceleration (ax, ay, az) are filtered in
accordance with CFC1000 (cf. CFC filters).

Relevant Laws and Regulations

Directive 96/79/EG, Annex II, 3.2.1.1


Directive 96/79/EG, Annex II, Appendix 2, 1.2
ECE R94, Annex 4, 1.2
ECE R95, 5.2.1.1
ECE R95, Annex 4, Appendix 1, 1.

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

1-7

Chapter 1

Description of the Head Criteria

HCD
HCD is the abbreviation for Head Contact Duration

Description
The HCD value is the standardized maximum integral value of the head
acceleration during head contact intervals. The contact intervals are
determined using the resultant contact force (calculated from neck force of
the upper neck transducer, head acceleration and head mass).

Mathematical Calculation
To determine the contact interval, the resultant contact force F has to be
calculated first.

F =

( m ax Fx ) + ( m ay Fy ) + ( m a z Fz )

with:

m
ai
Fi

Mass of the head


head acceleration in i-direction
upper neck force in i-direction

Contact intervals are all the intervals in which a lower threshold value
(threshold level = 200 N) is constantly exceeded and a lower search level
(search level = 500 N) is exceeded at least once (see Figure 1-1 below).

Figure 1-1. Search und Threshold Level

1-8

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 1

Description of the Head Criteria

The HIC value HICj is calculated for each contact interval Kj.

Kj = tj

beg end
;t j

HIC j = HIC ( t 1, t 2 ) ;t j

beg

end

t 1 < t 2 t j

with:

tjbeg

Start time of the contact interval Kj

tjend

End time of the contact interval Kj

The HCD value is then the maximum HIC value of all the contact intervals.

HCD = max j {HIC j }

Determining Input Values


The measured values for head acceleration (ax, ay, az) and neck forces (Fx,
Fy, Fz) are filtered in accordance with CFC1000 (cf. CFC filters).

Relevant Laws and Regulations

SAE J2052, 2.2.2


SAE J2052, 4
ISO/TC22/SC12/WG3 N 282 (Issued 1990-03-16)
TRANS/SC1/WP29/GRSP/R.48/Rev.1, page 19, Annex 4,
Appendix 1

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

1-9

Chapter 1

1-10

Description of the Head Criteria

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Description of the Neck Criteria

This chapter describes the following neck criteria for a front impact and a
rear impact:
Front Impact:

MOC:

Total Moment about Occipital Condyle

MTO:

Total Moment (Lower Neck)

Time At Level

NIC (front impact ECE):

Neck Injury Criterion

NIC (front impact EuroNCAP):

Neck Injury Criterion

NIC (front impact FMVSS):

Neck Injury Criterion

Nij:

Normalized Neck Injury Criterion

Rear Impact:

NIC (rear impact): Neck Injury Criterion

Nkm:

Neck Criterion rear impact

LNL:

Lower Neck Load Index

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

2-1

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

MOC
MOC is the abbreviation for Total Moment about Occipital Condyle.

Description
The criterion for the Total Moment calculates the total moment in relation
to the moment measurement point.

Mathematical Calculation
For the Upper Load Cell, the Total Moment Moc is calculated in
accordance with SAE J1727 and SAE J1733 as follows:

M OCy = M y ( D F x )
M OCx = M x + ( D F y )
with

MOCi
Fi
Mi
D

Total moment in i-direction [Nm]


Upper neck force in i-direction [N]
Neck moment in i-direction [Nm]
Distance between the force sensor axis and the condyle axis

Determining Input Values


The measured values for the forces and moments are filtered in accordance
with CFC600 (cf. CFC filters). This filtering applies independently of the
filter classes for forces, specified in SAE J211 (see FMVSS 208 S6.6(1),
for example).
In Table 2-8 the lever arms of the Upper Load Cell are specified for the
calculation in accordance with SAE J1727, for each dummy type.

2-2

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

Table 2-1. Lever Arms of the Upper-Load-Cell


Load cell
Type Denton;FTSS;MSC

Axial
directions

D[m]

Hybrid III, male 95%

1716; IF-2564, IF-205,


IF-207, IF-242; 555B/6UN

0,01778

Hybrid III, male 50%

1716; IF-2564, IF-205,


IF-207, IF-242; 555B/6UN

0,01778

2062

0,008763

Hybrid III, female

1716; IF-2564, IF-205,


IF-207, IF-242; 555B/6UN

0,01778

Hybrid III; 10-year

1716; IF-2564, IF-205,


IF-207, IF-242; 555B/6UN

0,01778

Hybrid III; 6-year

1716; IF-2564, IF-205,


IF-207, IF-242; 555B/6UN

0,01778

Hybrid III; 3-year

3303; IF-234; 560G/6ULN

Crabi 12; 18 months;


TNO P1,5

2554; IF-954; 560G/6ULN

0,0058

Crabi 6 months

2554; IF-954; 560G/6ULN

0,0102

TNO P 3/4; P3

2331; IF-212, IF-235;


5583G/3ULN

2587; IF-212, IF-235;


558G/6UN

1485

4085, IF-240; 5552G/6UN

0,02

TNO Q series

3715, IF-217; 5563G/6LN

SID-IIs

1716; IF-2564, IF-205,


IF-207, IF-242; 555B/6UN

0,01778

BioRID

4949

0,01778

2062

0,008763

4985

0,01778

W50-1700

0,0195

Dummy type

ES-2

WORLDSID

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

2-3

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

Relevant Laws and Regulations


SAE J1727, 3.3 ( 08/96 )
SAE J1733 ( 12/94 )
Denton Sign Convention for Load Cells (S.A.E. J-211) ( 27AUG02 )

2-4

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

MTO
MTO is the abbreviation for Total Moment and applies for the lower neck.

Description
The criterion for the Total Moment calculates the total moment in relation
to the moment measurement point.

Mathematical Calculation
For the Lower Load Cell, the Total Moment MTO is calculated in
accordance with SAE J1733 as follows:

M TOx = M x ( D z F y )
M TOy = M y + ( D z F x ) + ( D x F z )
M TOz = M z ( D x F y )
with

MTOi
Fi
Mi
D

Moment in i-direction [Nm]


Upper neck force in i-direction [N]
Neck moment in i-direction [Nm]
Distance between the force sensor axis and the condyle axis

Determining Input Values


The measured values for the forces and moments are filtered in accordance
with CFC600 (cf. CFC filters). This filtering applies independently of the
filter classes for forces, specified in SAE J211 (see FMVSS 208 S6.6(1),
for example).
In the Table 2-2 the lever arms D x and D z in the Lower Load Cell are
specified for the calculation in accordance with SAE J1733 for each
dummy type.

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

2-5

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

Table 2-2. Lever Arms Dx and Dz of the Lower-Load-Cell


Dummy type
Hybrid III, male 95%

Load cell type


Denton; FTSS
1794; IF-210,
IF-219

Dx[m]

Dz[m]

0,0508

0,028575

0,04445

0,028575

4894
Hybrid III, male 50%

1794; IF-210,
IF-219
4894

Hybrid III, female 5%

1794; IF-211,
IF-228, IF-238
4541

Hybrid III; 10-year

5124

0,0188

Hybrid III; 6-year

1794; IF-222

0,03175

0,0237236

Hybrid III; 3-year

3303

0,0168

2554LN; IF-954

0,0127

3715

1794; IF-255

0,04445

0,0254

CRABI 6,12,18,TNO, P1 1/2


TNO Q1, Q3, Q6
SID-IIs

3166
SID HIII

5294

0,0127

THOR 50%

2357

0,0254

THOR 5%

2357

0,0191

0,22

- ; IF-221

0,04445

0,028575

BioRID

1794

0,0508

0,0254

RID2

1794

0,0508

0,0254

W50-1700

0,0145

4366
EuroSID-1

4365; IF-221
3300

ES-2

WORLDSID

You use special formulas for the adjustable load cells 2992, 3471, and 3717. (See
Denton Sign Convention for Load Cells (SAE J211) ( 27AUG02 ))

Note

Note

2-6

Lower Neck Load Cell of BioRID; 1794, validated in dynamic testing (cf. LNL).

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

Relevant Laws and Regulations


SAE J1727,3.3 ( 08/96 )
SAE J1733 ( 12/94 )
Denton Sign Convention for Load Cells (SAE J211) ( 27AUG02 )

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

2-7

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

Time At Level
Time-Dependent Loading Criteria

Description
The time-at-level describes the maximum continuous time interval for
which the measured value of a signal has exceeded a certain lower
threshold. The value is determined either from the continuous time interval
(continuous calculation) or from the sum of all time intervals (cumulative
calculation).

Mathematical Calculation
Continuous Calculation
To determine the relationship between the measured value of the signal
(e.g. the force) and its corresponding time-at-level, the time-related load
criterion curve is determined, as illustrated in Figure 2-1:

Figure 2-1. Load Criterion Curve

2-8

1.

The threshold values are plotted on the ordinate, the times-at-level are
plotted on the abscissa.

2.

The maximum measured value and the time-at-level zero are assigned
to the highest threshold value.

3.

In a matrix with two columns and 101 rows, all the threshold values
are stored in the first column, starting with the maximum value. All the
threshold values in this column are equal to the preceding ones minus
the quotient, which is the maximum value divided by 100. Zero is
assigned to the threshold value in the last line.

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

4.

The largest continuous time interval in which the threshold value is


exceeded by the measurement signal is determined for every threshold
value in the first column. Use linear interpolation to determine the time
interval, round it to the nearest millisecond, and enter it in the second
column.

5.

Every line in this matrix describes a value pair (point) that consists of
the threshold value and the time at level the load criterion curve
which are plotted in a coordinate system (criterion graph) and thus
compared to the injury assessment boundary. Times at level are only
taken into account if they are less than 60 ms.

6.

To compare the load criterion curve to the injury assessment


boundary, the ratio between the load criterion value and the injury
assessment boundary value is determined for each value pair and
multiplied by 100. The highest value determined is the injury
assessment reference value and is entered in the coordinate system.

Cumulative Calculation
If the sampling rates are constant, the accumulated values can be calculated
with the following algorithm:
1.

Values in descending order

2.

Value (sorted) after x ms is the y-value.

Determining Input Values

Relevant Laws and Regulations


SAE J1727, 3.9
EuroNCAP, Front Impact, 10.2.2

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

2-9

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

NIC (front impact ECE)


NIC is the abbreviation for Neck Injury Criterion.

Description
The neck injury criteria are determined using the axial compression force
Fz(-), the axial tensile force Fz (+), and the shear forces at the head/neck
point Fx(+), in kN, as well as the duration of these forces, as illustrated in
Figure 2-2.

Figure 2-2. Axial Neck Tensile Force and Neck Shear Force at the Side
Note

Annex 3; 2.1.1 applies only for the Hybrid III 50% dummy.

Mathematical Calculation
For all the above-mentioned signals, the time-at-level (cf. Time At Level) is
calculated and compared to the corresponding limits.

Determining Input Values


The measured values of the axial force Fz and the side shear force Fx, are
filtered according to CFC1000 (cf. CFC filters).

2-10

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

Relevant Laws and Regulations

Directive 96/79/EG, Annex II, 3.2.1.2


Directive 96/79/EG, Annex II, Appendix 2, 2
ECE-R94, 5.2.1.2
ECE R94, Annex 4, 2
SAE J1733

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

2-11

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

NIC (front impact EuroNCAP)


NIC is the abbreviation for Neck Injury Criterion.

Description
The neck injury criteria are determined using the axial tensile force Fz(+),
the shear forces at the head/neck point, Fx(+) and Fx (-), in kN, and the
duration of these forces in milliseconds, as illustrated in Figures 2-3 to 2-5.

Figure 2-3. Shear Forces positive at the Head/Neck Point in X-Direction

2-12

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

Figure 2-4. Shear Forces negative at the Head/Neck Point in Z-Direction

The dotted lines are determined from the Lower and Upper Limits, using linear
scaling.

Note

Figure 2-5. Tensile Forces at the Head/Neck Point in Z-Direction

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

2-13

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

Mathematical Calculation
For all the above-mentioned signals, the cumulative time-at-level (cf. Time
At Level) is calculated and compared to the limits.

Determining Input Values


The measured values of the axial force Fz and the side shear force Fx, are
filtered according to CFC1000 (cf. CFC filters).

Relevant Laws and Regulations


EuroNCAP, Frontal Impact, 10.2
SAE J1733

2-14

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

NIC (front impact FMVSS)


NIC is the abbreviation for Neck Injury Criterion.

Description
NIC is the criterion for neck injury. The NIC includes:
(a) the criterion of the Normalized Neck Injury Criterion (Nij) and
(b) the criterion of the limit value monitoring (peak tension and peak
compression).

Mathematical Calculation
a.

cf. Nij

b.

Table 2-3 shows the limits to be adhered to for each dummy type.
Table 2-3. Limits for Various Dummy Types
Fz [N]
Peak Tension

Fz [N]
Peak Compression

Hybrid III, male 50%

4170

-4000

Hybrid III, female 5%

2620

-2520

Hybrid III; 6-year

1490

-1820

Hybrid III; 3-year

1130

-1380

CRABI; 12 months

780

-960

Hybrid III, female 5%

2070

-2520

Position
In Position

Out of Position

Dummy type

Determining Input Values


The measured values for limit monitoring are filtered in accordance with
CFC1000 (cf. CFC filters).

Relevant Laws and Regulations

FMVSS 208 (May 2000), S6.6 (b)(c) (HYIII-50%)


FMVSS 208 (May 2000), S15.3.6 (b)(c) (HYIII-5%)
FMVSS 208 (May 2000), S19.4.4 (b)(c) (HYIII-12M)
FMVSS 208 (May 2000), S21.5.5 (b)(c) (HyIII-3-year)
FMVSS 208 (May 2000), S23.5.5 (b)(c) (HyIII-6-year)
FMVSS 208 (May 2000), S25.4 (b)(c) (HyIII-5% Out of position)

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

2-15

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

Nij
Nij is the abbreviation for Normalized Neck Injury Criterion and includes
the 4 neck criteria (Neck Injury Predictor) NTE (tension-extension), NTF
(tension-flexion), NCE (compression-extension), and NCF
(compression-flexion).

Description
The criteria for neck injuries are determined using the axial compression
force, the axial tensile force, and the shearing forces at the transition from
head to neck, expressed in kN, and the duration of these forces in ms. The
neck bending moment criterion is determined by the bending moment,
expressed in Nm, around a lateral axis at the transition from the head to the
neck, and recorded.

Mathematical Calculation
The Nij value is calculated according to the equation:

F
M OCy
Nij = -------z + ------------F zc M yc
with

Fz
Fzc
MOCy
Myc

force at the transition from head to neck


critical force
Total Moment (see MOC)
critical moment

Determining Input Values


The measured values of the tensile force and compression force are filtered
in accordance with CFC 600. (cf. CFC filters). The Total Moment is
calculated in accordance with MOC.
When the criteria are calculated, particular forces and moments are to be
set at 0. This is an AND condition, i.e. if one of the summands is zero, the
condition is also zero. This is displayed in Table 2-4:

2-16

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

Table 2-4. Forces and Moments


Forces

Criterion Nij
NCF
NCE
NTF

Moments

Compression(force of
pressure)
F<0

Flexion (forwards bending)


M>0

Tension (tensile force)


F>0

Flexion (forwards bending)


M>0

Extension (backwards extension)


M<0

NTE

Extension (backwards extension)


M<0

Table 2-5 shows the critical forces F zc and moments M yc for the in
position test according to the dummy types.
Table 2-5. In position test
Fzc [N]
Tension

Fzc [N] a
Compression

Myc [Nm]
Flexion

Myc [Nm] a
Extension

Hybrid III, male 50%

6806

-6160

310

-135

Hybrid III, female 5%

4287

- 3880

155

- 67

Dummy type

a.

The negative signs of Fzc and Myc make positive Nij values (signal polarity in accordance
with SAE J211 and SAE J1733).

Table 2-6 shows the critical forces F zc and moments M yc for the out of
position test according to the dummy types.
Table 2-6. Out of Position Test
Fzc [N]
Tension

Fzc [N] a
Compression

Myc [Nm]
Flexion

Myc [Nm] a
Extension

Hybrid III, female 5%

3880

-3880

155

-61

Hybrid III; 6-year

2800

-2800

93

-37

Hybrid III; 3-year

2120

-2120

68

-27

Hybrid III; 12 months

1460

-1460

43

-17

Dummy type

a.

The negative signs of Fzc and Myc make positive Nij values (signal polarity in accordance
with SAE J211 and SAE J1733).

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

2-17

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

Relevant Laws and Regulations

FMVSS 208 (May 2000), S6.6


FMVSS 208 (May 2000), S15.3.6
FMVSS 208 (May 2000), S19.4.4
FMVSS 208 (May 2000), S21.5.5
FMVSS 208 (May 2000), S23.5.5

Publications:
Supplement: Development of Improved Injury Criteria for the
Assessment of Advanced Automotive Restraint Systems-II; Rolf
Eppinger, Emily Sun, Shashi Kuppa (NTBRC) and Roger Saul
(VRTC); March 2000 NHTSA

2-18

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

NIC (rear impact)


NIC is the abbreviation for Neck Injury Criterion.

Description
The criterion for the neck injury with a rear impact is expressed by the
relative acceleration between the upper and lower neck acceleration, in
m/s, and the relative velocity, in m/s.

Mathematical Calculation
The calculation of the NIC value is based on the equation:

NIC = a relative 0, 2 + v 2 relative


with:

a relative = a x
v relative =

T1

ax

Head

a relative

and

axT1

Acceleration of the first chest vertebra in x-direction [m/s]

axHead

Acceleration in x-direction at the height of the center of gravity


(c.o.g.) of the head [m/s]

Determining Input Values


The measured values of the accelerations are filtered in accordance with
CFC 180 (cf. CFC filters). The maximum value of NIC within an interval
of 150 ms after the beginning of the sled acceleration schall be determined
and documented as the NICmax value. If the head, after contacting the head
restraint, reverses its direction of relative movement at a point in time
before 150 ms, the upper end of the interval of NIC for the determination
of NICmax shall be limited by this point in time.

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

2-19

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

Relevant Laws and Regulations


This injury criterion is in the research phase.

Publications:
A SLED TESTS PROCEDURE PROPOSAL TO EVALUATE THE
RISK OF NECK INJURY IN LOW SPEED REAR IMPACTS
USING A NEW NECK INJURY CRITERION (NIC); Paper no.
98-S7-O-07; Ola Bostrm, Yngve Hland, Rikard Frediksson, Autoliv
Research Sweden, Mats Y Svensoson Hugo Mellander, Chalmers
University of Technology Sweden; 16 th ESV Conference; June 1-4,
1998 Windsor Canada

EVALUATION OF THE APPLACABILITY OF THE NECK


INJURY CRITERION (NIC) IN REAR END IMPACTS ON THE
BASIS OF HUMAN SUBJECT TESTS; A.Eichberger, H. Steffan,
B.Geigl, M.Svensson, O. Bostrm, P.E. Leinzinger, M.Darok;
IRCOBI Conference Gteborg, September 1998

Proposal for the ISO/TC22N2071, ISO/TC22/SC10 (Collision Test


Procedures): TEST PROCEDURE FOR THE EVALUATION OF
THE INJURY RISK TO THE CERVICAL SPINE IN A LOW SPEED
REAR END IMPACT; M. Muser, H. Zellmer, F. Walz, W. Hell,
K. Langwieder, K. Steiner, H. Steffan; Rear end impact test procedure,
working draft 5, 05/2001

2-20

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

Nkm
Nkm in accordance with the 4 neck criteria Nfa (flexion-anterior), Nea
(extension-anterior), Nfp (flexion-posterior), Nep (extension-posterior).

Description
The criteria for neck injuries for rear impact are determined using the axial
compression force or the axial tensile force x, and the shearing forces at the
transition from head to neck, expressed in kN, and the duration of these
forces in ms. The neck bending moment criterion is determined by the
bending moment, expressed in Nm, around a lateral axis at the transition
from the head to the neck, and recorded.

Mathematical Calculation
The Nkm value is calculated with the equation:

F x ( t ) M OCy ( t )
Nkm ( t ) = ----------- + -------------------F int
M int
with

Fx
Fint
MOCy
Mint

force at the transition from head to neck


critical force
total moment (see MOC)
critical moment

Determining Input Values


The measured values of the tension are filtered in accordance with
CFC 600. The measured values of the bending moment and the side
shearing force are also filtered in accordance with CFC 600 (cf. CFC
filters).
When the criteria are calculated, particular forces and moments are to be
set at 0. This is an AND condition, i.e. if one of the summands is zero, the
condition is also zero. This is displayed in Table 2-7:

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

2-21

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

Table 2-7. Forces and Moments


Criterion Nkm
Nfa
Nea
Nfp
Nep

Forces

Moments

Anterior (head backwards,


torso forwards)
Fx>0

Flexion (forwards bending)


My>0

Posterior (head forwards,


torso backwards)
Fx<0

Flexion (forwards bending)


My>0

Extension (backwards extension)


My<0

Extension (backwards extension)


My<0

Table 2-8 shows the critical forces Fint and moments Mint for each dummy
type.
Table 2-8. Critical Forces and Moments

a.

Dummy type

Fint [N]
positive shear

Fint [N] a
negative shear

Mint [Nm]
Flexion

Mint [Nm] a
Extension

Hybrid III, male 50%

845

-845

88,1

-47,5

The negative signs of Fint and Mint make positive Nkm values (signal polarity in
accordance with SAE J211 and SAE J1733).

Relevant Laws and Regulations


Working Group on Accident Mechanics
www.agu.ch

Publications:
A NEW NECK INJURY CRITERION CANDIDATE FOR
REAR-END COLLISIONS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT SHEAR
FORCES AND BENDING MOMENTS (Schmitt, Muser, Niederer)
ESV Conference 2001, Amsterdam NL

2-22

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

LNL
LNL is the abbreviation for the Lower Neck Load Index.

Description
The risk of damaging the lower neck vertebrae in a rear-impact crash is
highest when the forces and moments impact simultaneously.

Mathematical Calculation
The LNL value is calculated with the equation:

My lower ( t ) + Mx lower ( t ) 2
Fx lower ( t ) 2 + Fy lower ( t ) 2
Fz lower ( t )
LNL index ( t ) = --------------------------------------------------------------------- + ------------------------------------------------------------------ + -----------------------C moment
C shear
C tension

with

Note

Mylower
Mxlower

Moment in y-direction

Cmoment

Critical moment

Fxlower
Fylower
Cshear
Fz
Ctension

Force in x-direction

Moment in x-direction

Force in y-direction
Critical force
Force in z-direction
Critical force

The formula applies for the Lower Neck Load Cell of the RID2 and Hybrid III.

The result My can be corrected for the Hybrid III with the
Denton 1794, FMVSS IF-210, and IF-219, MSC 4894 power cells,
using the formula below:

My lowercorrected = My + ( 0, 0282 Fx ) + ( 0, 0508 Fz )

The My moment may not be corrected for RID2.

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

2-23

Chapter 2

Description of the Neck Criteria

Determining Input Values


The measured values for the forces and moments are filtered in accordance
with CFC 600 (cf. CFC filters). This filtering applies separately from the
filter classes specified in SAEJ211 (cf. Nij-FMVSS208).
Table 2-9 lists the critical forces and moments for the dummy type RID2.
Table 2-9. Critical Forces and Moments for RID2

Cmoment

Cshear

Ctension

15 [Nm]

250 [N]

900 [N]

Relevant Laws and Regulations

2-24

SAE J1727
SAE J1733
Denton Sign Convention for Load Cells
AN EVALUATION OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED INJURY
CRITERIA WITH VARIOUS DUMMIES TO DETERMINE THEIR
ABILITY TO PREDICT THE LEVELS OF SOFT TISSUE NECK
INJURY SEEN IN REAL WORLD ACCIDENTS; Frank Heitplatz et
all; ESV Conference 2003

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Description of the Chest Criteria

The following chest criteria are described in this chapter:

VC:

Viscous Criterion (velocity of compression)

THPC:

Thorax Performance Criterion

TTI(d):

Thoracic Trauma Index (Thorax Trauma Index)

ThAC:

Thorax Acceptability Criterion

CTI:

Combined Thoracic Index

ThCC (or TCC): Thoracic Compression Criterion

RDC:

Rib Deflection Criterion

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

3-1

Chapter 3

Description of the Chest Criteria

VC
VC is the abbreviation for Viscous Criterion (velocity of compression), and
is also called the Soft Tissue Criterion.

Description
VC is an injury criterion for the chest area. The VC value [m/s] is the
maximum crush of the momentary product of the thorax deformation speed
and the thorax deformation. Both quantities are determined by measuring
the rib deflection (side impact) or the chest deflection (frontal impact).
Note

Only the crush is included in the calculation.

Mathematical Calculation
The calculation of the VC value is based on the equation:
In accordance with ECE-R94, ECE-R95 and EuroNCAP (front and side
impact)
dY CFC180
Y CFC180
VC = Scalingfactor ----------------------- ---------------------Defconst
dt
In accordance with SAE J1727: (Frontal impact)
Y CFC600
dY CFC600
VC = Scalingfactor ----------------------- ---------------------Defconst
dt
with:

3-2

Thoracic deformation [m]

(dYCFCxxx/dt)

Deformation velocity

Scalingfactor

Scaling factor (see Table 3-1)

Defconst

Dummy constant, i.e. depth or width of half the rib cage [mm]
(see also determination of the input quantities (VC))

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 3

Description of the Chest Criteria

The deformation speed is calculated in accordance with ECE R94:


dY [ t ] CFC180
8 ( Y [ t + t ] Y [ t t ] ) ( Y [ t + 2t ] Y [ t 2t ] )
---------------------------- = V [ t ] = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------dt
12t
with:

Time interval between the single measurements in seconds

If required, the chest or rib crush/velocity can be calculated with the difference
between opposite acceleration signals, using integration. This method is not included in
any of the listed laws or guidelines.

Note

Determining Input Values


Filtering of the input values cf. Mathematical Calculation
Table 3-1 contains the scaling factor and the deformation constant (dummy
constants) for each dummy type, in accordance with SAE J1727, 8/96.
Table 3-1. Scaling Factor and Dummy Constants
Scaling factor

Deformation
constant [mm]

Hybrid III, male 95%

1,3

254

Hybrid III, male 50%

1,3

229

Hybrid III, female 5%

1,3

187

BioSID

1,0

175

EuroSID-1

1,0

140

ES-2

1,0

140

SID-IIs

1,0

138

Dummy type

Relevant Laws and Regulations

ECE R94, Directive 96/79/EG, Annex II, 3.2.1.5


ECE R94, Directive 96/79/EG, Annex II, Appendix 2, 6.1-6.2
ECE-R94, 5.2.1.4
ECE R94, Annex 4, 3.2
ECE R94, Annex 4, 6
ECE R95, 5.2.1.2 b)

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

3-3

Chapter 3

Description of the Chest Criteria

3-4

ECE R95, Annex 4, Appendix 1, 2.2


ECE R95, Annex 4, Appendix 2
Directive 96/27 EG Annex 2, 3.2.1.2 b)
Directive 96/27 EG Annex 1, Appendix 1, 2.2
Directive 96/27 EG Annex 1, Appendix 2
SAE J211, 9.4.3
SAE J1727, 3.8.1
EuroNCAP, Front Impact, 10.3
EuroNCAP, Side Impact, 10.3

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 3

Description of the Chest Criteria

THPC
THPC is the abbreviation for Thorax Performance Criterion.

Description
THPC is the criterion for chest strain with side impact. The two elements
of the THPC are the rib deflection criterion (RDC) and the viscous criterion
(VC).

Mathematical Calculation
cf. RDC and VC

Determining Input Values


cf. RDC and VC

Relevant Laws and Regulations

ECE-R95, 5.2.1.2
ECE R95, Annex 4, Appendix 1, 2
Directive 96/27 EG Annex 2, 3.2.1.2
Directive 96/27 EG Annex 1, Appendix 1, 2
Directive 96/27 EG Annex 1, Appendix 2

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

3-5

Chapter 3

Description of the Chest Criteria

TTI(d)
TTI(d) is the abbreviation for Thoracic Trauma Index (Thorax Trauma
Index).

Description
The thorax trauma index is an injury criterion for the thorax in the case of
a side impact. The TTI(d) is the mean of the maximum acceleration of the
abdominal spine (12th spinal segment) and the higher of the two values for
the maximum acceleration of the upper (8th) and lower (4th) ribs.

Mathematical Calculation
The calculation of the TTI value is based on the equation:

( max, rip ) + A ( lwr ,spine )TTI ( d ) = A


----------------------------------------------------------------------2
A ( max, rip ) = max {A ( upr ,rip ) ,A ( lwr ,rip }
with:
A(upr.rib)

Maximum acceleration of the upper rib; [g]

A(lwr.rib)

Maximum acceleration of the lower rib; [g]

A(max.rib)

Maximum of A(upr.rib) and A(lwr.rib); [g]

A(lwr.spine)

Maximum acceleration of the lower spine; [g]

Determining Input Values


Preprocessing of the acceleration data from the sensors (cf. FIR100 filters):

3-6

1.

Filtering with CFC180 (cf. CFC filters)

2.

Reduction of the sampling rate to 1600 Hz

3.

Removal of bias

4.

Filtering with FIR100

5.

Transferring the reduced sampling rate to the original sampling rate


(oversampling, only SAE)

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 3

Description of the Chest Criteria

Due to the sign regulations in SAE J1733, the acceleration values have to
be positive absolute maximum values. If the test data is to be evaluated with
negative abs. maximum values, the measurement data must first be
inverted.
The calculation must use the original measurement data, not selected data
sections, otherwise the digital filters may have differing transient
responses.

Relevant Laws and Regulations


FMVSS 214, S5.1
FMVSS 214, S6.13.5
SAE J1727, 3.5

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

3-7

Chapter 3

Description of the Chest Criteria

ThAC
ThAC is the abbreviation for Thorax Acceptability Criterion.

Description
This criterion is determined using the absolute value of the acceleration
expressed in units of earth acceleration and the acceleration duration
expressed in ms.

Mathematical Calculation
cf. Xms

Determining Input Values


The measured values of acceleration of gravity are filtered in accordance
with CFC 180 (cf. CFC filters).

Relevant Laws and Regulations


ECE-R80, Annex 1, 1.1.2.1.2
ECE-R80, Annex 4, 2

3-8

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 3

Description of the Chest Criteria

CTI
CTI is the abbreviation for Combined Thoracic Index.

Description
The Combined Thoracic Index represents an injury criterion for the chest
area in case of a frontal impact. The CTI is the evaluated 3 ms value from
the resultant acceleration of the spinal cord and the deflection of the chest.

Mathematical Calculation
The calculation of the CIT value is based on the equation:

D max
A max
CTI = ----------- + ------------
A int D int
with:
Amax

3 ms value (single peak) of the resultant acceleration of


the spinal cord [g]

Aint

Critical 3 ms values [g]

Dmax

Deflection of the chest [mm]

Dint

Critical deflection [mm]

Determining Input Values


The measured values of the acceleration are filtered according to CFC180
and those of the displacement according to CFC600 (cf. CFC filters).
In Table 3-2, the critical 3 ms Aint and the critical deflection Dint is given for
each dummy type.
Table 3-2. Critical 3 ms Value and Critical Deflection
Dummy type

Aint [g]

Dint [mm]

Hybrid III, male 50%

85

102

Hybrid III, female 5%

85

83

Hybrid III; 6-year

85

63

Hybrid III; 3-year

70

57

CRABI; 12 months

55

49

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

3-9

Chapter 3

Description of the Chest Criteria

Relevant Laws and Regulations


Note

This criterion is not included in the actual standard!

3-10

FMVSS 208 proposal (September 1998), S6.6


FMVSS 208 proposal (September 1998), S15.3
FMVSS 208 proposal (September 1998), S19.4
FMVSS 208 proposal (September 1998), S21.5
FMVSS 208 proposal (September 1998), S23.5

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 3

Description of the Chest Criteria

ThCC (or TCC)


ThCC (or TCC) is the abbreviation for Thoracic Compression Criterion.

Description
ThCC is the criterion of the compression of the thorax between the sternum
and the spine and is determined using the absolute value of the thorax
compression, expressed in mm.

Mathematical Calculation

Determining Input Values


The measured values for the chest deflection are filtered in accordance with
CFC180 (cf. CFC filters).

Relevant Laws and Regulations

ECE-R94, 5.2.1.4
ECE R94, Annex 4, 3
Directive 96/79/EG, Annex II, 3.2.1.4
Directive 96/79/EG, Annex II, Appendix 2, 3.1

In the German directives this criterion was called TCC, but it was called ThCC in
the English directives.

Note

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

3-11

Chapter 3

Description of the Chest Criteria

RDC
RDC is the abbreviation for Rib Deflection Criterion.

Description
RDC is the criterion for the deflection of the ribs, expressed in mm, in a side
impact collision.

Mathematical Calculation

Determining Input Values


The measured values for rib deflection are filtered in accordance with
CFC180 (cf. CFC filters).

Relevant Laws and Regulations

3-12

ECE R95, 5.2.1.2 a)


ECE R95, Annex 4, Appendix 1, 2.1
Directive 96/27 EG Annex 2, 3.2.1.2. a)
Directive 96/27 EG Annex 1, Appendix 1, 2.1

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Description of the Criteria for


the Lower Extremities

The following criteria for the lower extremities are described in this
chapter:

APF:

Abdominal Peak Force

PSPF:

Pubic Symphysis Peak Force

FFC (ECE):

Femur Force Criterion

FFC (EuroNCAP): Femur Force Criterion

TI:

Tibia Index

TCFC:

Tibia Compression Force Criterion

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

4-1

Chapter 4

Description of the Criteria for the Lower Extremities

APF
APF is the abbreviation for Abdominal Peak Force. This is a criterion for
the European side impact regulations.

Description
APF is the maximum side abdominal strain criterion. It is the highest value
of the sum of the three forces [kN] that are measured on the impact side.

Mathematical Calculation
APF = max F yFront + F yMiddle + F yRear

Determining Input Values


The measured values for the abdominal strain are filtered in accordance
with CFC 600 (cf. CFC filters).

Relevant Laws and Regulations

4-2

ECE-R95, 5.2.1.4
ECE R95, Annex 4, Appendix 1, 3
Directive 96/27 EG Annex 2, 3.2.1.4
Directive 96/27 EG Annex 1, Appendix 1, 3

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 4

Description of the Criteria for the Lower Extremities

PSPF
PSPF is the abbreviation for Pubic Symphysis Peak Force.

Description
PSPF is the criterion for pelvic strain during side impact and is determined
by the maximum strain on the pubic symphysis, expressed in kN.

Mathematical Calculation

Determining Input Values


The measured values for the pelvic strain are filtered in accordance with
CFC 600 (cf. CFC filters).

Relevant Laws and Regulations

ECE R95, 5.2.1.3


ECE R95, Annex 4, Appendix 1, 4
Directive 96/27 EG Annex 2, 3.2.1.3
Directive 96/27 EG Annex 1, Appendix 1, 4

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

4-3

Chapter 4

Description of the Criteria for the Lower Extremities

FFC (ECE)
FFC is the abbreviation for Femur Force Criterion.

Description
FFC is the criterion of the force acting on the femur Fz(-) and is determined
by the compression stress in kN that is transmitted axially on each femur of
the dummy as well as the duration of action of the compression force in ms.

Figure 4-1. Pressure on the Thigh


Note

The pressure is entered as a positive value in the diagram.

Mathematical Calculation
cf. Time At Level
Note

The time-at-level is calculated cumulatively (cf. FFC (EuroNCAP)).

Determining Input Values


The measured values for the axial force of pressure are filtered in
accordance with CFC600 (cf. CFC filters).

4-4

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 4

Description of the Criteria for the Lower Extremities

Relevant Laws and Regulations

ECE-R94, 5.2.1.6
ECE R94, Annex 4, 4
Directive 96/79/EG, Annex II, 3.2.1.6
Directive 96/79/EG, Annex II, Appendix 2, 4.1

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

4-5

Chapter 4

Description of the Criteria for the Lower Extremities

FFC (EuroNCAP)
FFC is the abbreviation for Femur Force Criterion

Description
FFC is the criterion of the force acting on the femur Fz(-) and is determined
by the compression stress in kN that is transmitted axially on each femur of
the dummy as well as the duration of action of the compression force in ms.

Figure 4-2. Cumulative Exceedence Limits

The dotted lines are determined from the Lower and Upper Limits, using linear
scaling.

Note

Mathematical Calculation
cf. Time At Level
Note

The time-at-level is calculated cumulatively.

Determining Input Values


The measured values for the axial force of pressure are filtered in
accordance with CFC600 (cf. CFC filters).

4-6

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 4

Description of the Criteria for the Lower Extremities

Relevant Laws and Regulations


EuroNCAP, Frontal Impact Testing Protocol, Version 4.0; January
2003

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

4-7

Chapter 4

Description of the Criteria for the Lower Extremities

TI
TI is the abbreviation for the Tibia Index.

Description
The Tibia Index (TI) is an injury criterion for the lower leg area. It involves
the bending moments around the x and y-axes as well as the axial force of
pressure in the z direction at the top or bottom end of the tibia. When a
single-moment transducer is used, the absolute measured value is valid
for the calculation. If there are two directions, the resultant moment is to be
calculated and used.

Mathematical Calculation
The tibia index (TI) is calculated in accordance with:

MR
FZ
TI = ---------------+ -------------( MC )R
( FC )Z
with:

MR =

4-8

( Mx ) + ( My )

Mx

Bending moment [Nm] around the x-axis

My

Bending moment [Nm] around the y-axis

(Mc)R

Critical bending moment; cf. the table 4-1

Fz

Axial compression [kN] in z-direction

(Fc)z

Critical compression force in z-direction; cf. the


table 4-1

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 4

Description of the Criteria for the Lower Extremities

Determining Input Values


The measured values of the bending moment and the axial force of pressure
are filtered in accordance with CFC600 (cf. CFC filters).
Table 4-1 contains the critical bending moment and the critical
compression force for each dummy type, in accordance with SAE J1727,
3.11.
Table 4-1. Critical Bending Moment and Compression Force
Critical bending moment
[Nm]

Crit. compression
force [kN]

Hybrid III, male 95%

307,0

44,2

Hybrid III, male 50%

225,0

35,9

Hybrid III, female 5%

115,0

22,9

Dummy type

Figure 4-3 shows the possible forces and moments of a lower leg (using the
example of a Hybrid III dummy, lower left leg) for calculating the Tibia
Index.

TIBILEUPH3M0Y
y

TIBILEUPH3M0X

TIBIA

TIBILEUPH3F0Z

x
z

TIBILELOH3M0Y

TIBILELOH3M0X
TIBILELOH3M0Z

LOWER
LEG
LEFT

Figure 4-3. Forces and Moments Affecting the Lower Leg

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

4-9

Chapter 4

Description of the Criteria for the Lower Extremities

with
TIBILEUPH3M0X

Bending moment about the x-axis, upper tibia

TIBILEUPH3M0Y

Bending moment about the y-axis, upper tibia

TIBILEUPH3F0X

axial compression force in x-direction, upper tibia

TIBILEUPH3F0Y

axial compression force in y-direction, upper tibia

TIBILEUPH3F0Z

axial compression force in z-direction, upper tibia

TIBILELOH3M0X

Bending moment about the x-axis, lower tibia

TIBILELOH3M0Y

Bending moment about the y-axis, lower tibia

TIBILELOH3F0X

axial compression force in x-direction, lower tibia

TIBILELOH3F0Y

axial compression in y-direction, lower tibia

TIBILELOH3F0Z

axial compression force in z-direction, lower tibia

Table 4-2 shows the differences in calculation of the upper or lower Tibia
Index with a 5-channel and a 6-channel lower leg.
Table 4-2. Calculation of Tibia Indices for 5 and 6-Channel Lower Leg

5-channel lower leg


Values

TIBILEUPH3M0X
TIBILEUPH3M0X
TIBILELOH3F0X or
TIBILELOH3F0Y
TIBILELOH3F0Z
TIBILELOH3M0X or
TIBILELOH3M0Y

6-channel lower leg


TIBILEUPH3F0Z
TIBILEUPH3M0X
TIBILEUPH3M0X
TIBILELOH3F0Z
TIBILELOH3M0X
TIBILELOH3M0Y

Upper tibia
Resultant moment
MR =

Axial compression force

(TIBILEUPH3M0X )2 + (TIBILEUPH3M0Y )2

Fz=TIBILELOH3FOZ

MR =

(TIBILEUPH3M0X )2 + (TIBILEUPH3M0Y )2

Fz=TIBILEUPH3FOZ

Lower tibia
Resultant moment

Axial compression force

4-10

MR=|TIBILELOH3MOX|
MR=|TIBILELOH3MOY|
Fz=TIBILELOH3FOZ

or
MR =

(TIBILELOH3M0X )2 + (TIBILELOH3M0Y )2

Fz=TIBILELOH3FOZ

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 4

Description of the Criteria for the Lower Extremities

Table 4-3 shows the differences in the calculation of the upper or lower
tibia-index with two different 8-channel lower legs.
Table 4-3. Calculation of Tibia Indices for 8-Channel and Lower Leg

8-channel lower leg


Values

8-channel lower leg

TIBILEUPH3F0X
TIBILEUPH3F0Z
TIBILEUPH3M0X
TIBILEUPH3M0X
TIBILELOH3F0X
TIBILELOH3F0Z
TIBILELOH3M0X
TIBILELOH3M0Y

TIBILEUPH3F0X
TIBILEUPH3F0Z
TIBILEUPH3M0X
TIBILEUPH3M0X
TIBILELOH3F0X
TIBILELOH3F0Y
TIBILELOH3M0X
TIBILELOH3M0Y

Upper tibia
Resultant moment

(TIBILEUPH3M0X )2 + (TIBILEUPH3M0Y )2

MR =

Axial compression force

MR =

Fz=TIBILELOH3FOZ

(TIBILEUPH3M0X )2 + (TIBILEUPH3M0Y )2

Fz=TIBILELOH3FOZ

Lower tibia
Resultant moment
MR =

Axial compression force

(TIBILELOH3M0X )2 + (TIBILELOH3M0Y )2

Fz=TIBILELOH3FOZ

MR =

(TIBILELOH3M0X )2 + (TIBILELOH3M0Y )2

Fz=TIBILELOH3FOZ

The axial compression force Fz in the z-direction can be measured in the


upper or lower tibia, according to Annex 4, 5.2.

Relevant Laws and Regulations

ECE-R94, 5.2.1.8
ECE R94, Annex 4, 5.2
Directive 96/79/EG, Annex II, 3.2.1.8
Directive 96/79/EG, Annex II, Appendix 2, 5.2
SAE J1727, 3.11
SAE J211, Table 1
EuroNCAP, Front Impact, 10.6

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

4-11

Chapter 4

Description of the Criteria for the Lower Extremities

TCFC
TCFC is the abbreviation for Tibia Compression Force Criterion.

Description
TCFC is the criterion for the tibia strain and is the force of pressure Fz,
expressed in kN, that is transferred axially to each tibia on the test dummy
(cf. TI).

Mathematical Calculation

Determining Input Values


The measured values for the axial force of pressure are filtered in
accordance with CFC600 (cf. CFC filters).

Relevant Laws and Regulations

4-12

ECE-R94, 5.2.1.7
ECE R94, Annex 4, 5.1
Directive 96/79/EG, Annex II, 3.2.1.7
Directive 96/79/EG, Annex II, Appendix 2, 5.1

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Description of Additional
Criteria

The following chest criteria are described in this chapter:

Xms:

Generalization of the 3ms value

Xg:

Time range for an acceleration greater than xg

Acomp:

Average Acceleration During Compression Phase

Pulse Test:

Deceleration corridor for trolley

Gillis Index:

ID number for assessing vehicle


safety in front impact.

NCAP:

New Car Assessment Program

EuroNCAP:

European New Car Assessment Program

SI:

Severity Index

Integration:

Integration method used

Differentiation:

Differentiation method used

CFC filters:

Channel Frequency Class

FIR100 filter:

Finite Impulse Response

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

5-1

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

Xms
Xms is a generalization of the 3ms value.

Description
The xms value is the highest amplitude in a measured signal that lasts x
milliseconds. The Xms value specifies either as a single peak (SAE), or
multiple peaks (ECE-R94, FMVSS). In the cumulative calculation,
separate periods of the measurement signal are added, until x milliseconds
are reached.

Mathematical Calculation
The xms value can be calculated using one peak, as shown in Figures 5-1
and 5-2, or using several peaks, as shown in Figure 5-3.

Figure 5-1. Xms Calculation in One Peak

5-2

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

Case 5-2 is an exception and may have a total time of >xms.

Figure 5-2. Xms Calculation in a Stepped Peak

Since the SAE prescribes a time span of at least x ms, the total time
(4.5 ms) has to be specified, as shown in Figure 5-2.

Figure 5-3. Xms Calculation with Several Peaks

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

5-3

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

If the sampling rates are constant, the calculation of the accumulated xms
value shown in Figure 5-3 can be based on the following algorithm:
1.

Acceleration values in descending order

2.

Acceleration value (sorted) after x ms is the required xms value.

During calculations in accordance with ECE R94, the rebound movement


of the head is not to be taken into account.

Determining Input Values


The measured values are to be filtered in accordance with the legally
prescribed filter classes.

Relevant Laws and Regulations

Directive 96/79/EG, Annex 2, 3.2.1.1


ECE R94, Annex 3, 5.2.1
ECE R94, Annex 4, 1.3
ECE-R80, Annex 4, 2.1
ECE R44, 7.1.4.2.1
ECE R44, 7.1.4.2.2
ECE-R12, 5.3
ECE-R17, 5.1.3.1
ECE R25, Annex 6, 2
FMVSS 208 (May 2000), S15.3.3
FMVSS 208 (May 2000), S19.4.3
FMVSS 208 (May 2000), S21.5.3
FMVSS 208 (May 2000), S23.5.3
SAE J1727, 3.4
ADR69/00, 5.3.2
NHTSA 49 CFR 571[Docket No. 92-28;
Notice8],[RIN No. 2127-AG07]; S5.1 (b)

NHTSA 49 CFR 571,572,589[Docket No. 92-28;


Notice7],[RIN No. 2127-AB85]; S5.1 (b)

EURO NCAP, Front Impact, 10, 10.1


EURO NCAP, Side Impact, 10, 10.1

5-4

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

EURO NCAP, Pole Side Impact, 10, 10.1


EURO NCAP, Assessment Protocol , 5

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

5-5

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

Xg
Description
The Xg value is the time range for an acceleration that is greater than X[g]
was.

Mathematical Calculation
The Xg-value is determined either individually (single peak) or
cumulatively (multiple peaks) and is the time range in which the resultant
head acceleration was greater than X[g].
In the cumulative calculation, disconnected time ranges for which the
resultant head acceleration was greater than X[g], are added up.

Determining Input Values

Relevant Laws and Regulations

5-6

ECE-R12, 5.3
ECE-R17, 5.1.3.1
ECE-R24
ECE-R96, 3.2.1.1
ADR69/00, 5.3.2

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

Acomp
Acomp is the abbreviation for Average Acceleration During Compression
Phase.

Description
In a front impact crash, the mean acceleration during the deformation phase
is calculated for the vehicle acceleration in the x-direction.

Mathematical Calculation
The calculation is done in the following steps:
1.

Integration of the acceleration with the starting speed

2.

Defining the first point in time t1

3.

Alternative 1 in Figure 5-4: Determining a point of intersection t2 of


the determined velocity with the abscissa (time axis).

Figure 5-4. Alternative 1: Point of Intersection t2 of the Velocity with the Time Axis

Alternative 5.08 cm Figure 5-5: The point of inflection of the velocity


is determined. (The point of inflection is the first maximum of the
acceleration). The point of intersection t2 of the tangent with the
abscissa (time axis) is determined.

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

5-7

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

Figure 5-5. Alternative 2: Point of Intersection t2 of the Tangent to the Time Axis

4.

The acceleration signal is filtered with CFC60 (cf. CFC filters).

5.

The mean acceleration of the signal filtered with CFC60 is found


between the specified point in time t1 and the determined time t2.

Determining Input Values


The measured values of the acceleration are filtered in accordance with
CFC180 (cf. CFC filters).

Relevant Laws and Regulations


Company standards

5-8

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

Pulse Test
Deceleration corridor for Trolley

Description
In sled tests, you check whether the measured acceleration is within a
specific corridor, as shown in Figures 5-6 to 5-11.

Figure 5-6. Corridor for ECE-R44; Annex 7; Appendix 1

Figure 5-7. Corridor for ECE R44; Annex 7; Appendix 2

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

5-9

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

Figure 5-8. Corridor for ECE R16

Acceleration inGs

Figure 5-9. Corridor for ECE R80; Annex 4; Figure 1

A
-5

-10

-15

B
-20

25

C
50

75

100

125
Time in ms

Figure 5-10. Corridor for FMVSS 208; S13.1; Figure 6

5-10

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

Figure 5-11. Acceleration Impulse of Test Sled in Accordance with EN 1789


and DIN 75302, Figure 7

Mathematical Calculation
The test must determine whether straight lines between two points exceed
the specified range, not only whether the points themselves are within the
given range, as shown in Figure 5-12.

Figure 5-12. Points and Connecting Lines Must be Within the Corridor.

Determining Input Values


The measured values of the acceleration are filtered in accordance with
CFC60 (cf. CFC filters).

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

5-11

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

Relevant Laws and Regulations

5-12

ECE R16; Annex 8


ECE R44; Annex 7
ECE R80; Annex 4; Figure 1
FMVSS 208; S13.1
EN 1789
DIN75302

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

Gillis Index
Description
The Gillis index is a characteristic value for the assessment of the vehicle
security during frontal impact. To calculate the Gillis index, the
acceleration measurement points of the head and thorax are required as
well as the forces on the femur of the driver and the passenger.

Mathematical Calculation
1.

Calculate the HIC value and the HIC36 value for the driver and the
passenger.

2.

Determine the 3ms values of the resultant thorax acceleration for driver
and passenger.

3.

Determine the absolute maxima of the forces on the femur of the driver
and the passenger.

The Gillis index is calculated in accordance with:


F

F, l

F, r

B, l

B, r

D
3 F
+F
G = HIC + ---------------------- 16, 7 --- + ----------------------------- 0, 44 9, 80665
4 4, 448232
4
F

1--D
3 F
+F
1
B
HIC + ---------------------- 16, 7 --- + ----------------------------- 0, 44 --2
9, 80665
4 4, 448232
4
The Gillis-Index for 36 milliseconds is calculated according to:
F

F, l

F, r

B, l

B, r

3 F
D
+F
G36 = HIC36 + ---------------------- 16, 7 --- + ----------------------------- 0, 44 9, 80665
4 4, 448232
4
F

1
D
3 F
+F
1
--- HIC36 B + ---------------------- 16, 7 --- + ----------------------------- 0, 44 --9, 80665
4 4, 448232
4
2

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

5-13

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

with:
Indices

F: Driver, B: Passenger, l: left, r: Right

HIC

HIC value

HIC36

HIC36 value

3ms value of the resultant thorax acceleration

Absolute maxima of the forces on the femur

Determining Input Values


cf. HIC and Xms

Relevant Laws and Regulations

5-14

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

NCAP
NCAP is the abbreviation for New Car Assessment Program.

Description
In order to evaluate the test results, the probabilities of head and thorax
injuries according to Mertz (GM) and Prasad (Ford) are used.

Mathematical Calculation
The likelihood of head injuries is calculated according to:

P head = [ 1 + exp ( 5, 02 ( 0, 00351 HIC36 ) ) ]


with:

HIC36

HIC36 value

The probability of thorax injuries is calculated in accordance with:

P chest = [ 1 + exp ( 5, 55 ( 0, 0693 a chest,


with:

achest, 3ms

3ms ) ) ]

3 ms value for chest acceleration

If head and thorax injuries occur simultaneously, a combined probability is


calculated in accordance with:

P combined = P head + P chest ( P head P chest )


The following classification is determined with the determined probability
of Pcombined:
0,00>Pcombined 0,10
0,10 < Pcombined 0,20
0,20 < Pcombined 0,35
0,35 < Pcombined 0, 45
0 ,00>Pcombined 0,45

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

5-15

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

Determining Input Values

Relevant Laws and Regulations


Refer to the Internet address www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/testing/ncap for
more information.

5-16

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

EuroNCAP
EuroNCAP is the abbreviation for European New Car Assessment
Program.

Description
Vehicles are assessed and given stars that indicate the level of safety. The
following tests are performed:

Front Impact

Side Impact

Pole Side Impact

Pedestrian Test

Mathematical Calculation
A EuroNCAP spreadsheet shows the test results as points.
33 - 40 points
25 - 32 points
17 - 24 points
9 - 16 points
1 - 8 points

0 points

Determining Input Values

Relevant Laws and Regulations


European New Car Assessment Programme
Refer to the Internet address www.euroncap.com for more
information.

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

5-17

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

SI
SI is the abbreviation for the Severity Index.

Description
The SI value assesses the danger of a chest injury (obsolete, similar to HIC
{head injury}). This procedure is based on the Wayne-State Curve of
Human Tolerance of the human head.

Mathematical Calculation
The incremental SI value is calculated in accordance with:
Nj

1
= ------------ N
1000

inc

SI j

0,

2, 5

5 ( Ai

2, 5

+ Ai + 1 )

i = N( j 1 )1

with:
j

j=1,2, ... T

Length of the data set

Values per ms

Ai

i-th value of acceleration signal

The cumulative SI value is calculated in accordance with:

SI 1

cum

= SI 1

inc

SI j

cum

= SI j 1 + SI j

cum

inc

with j = 2,3, ... T

Determining Input Values

Relevant Laws and Regulations


SAE J885

5-18

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

Integration
Description
All those numeric integration processes (differentiation processes) are
suitable, which return the starting values after an integration followed by
differentiation or a differentiation with a subsequent integration.

Mathematical Calculation

Determining Input Values


Note Note that numerical integration routine results are incorrect if there is an offset in the
data set.

Relevant Laws and Regulations


SAE J1727, 3.1

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

5-19

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

Differentiation
Description
All those numeric differentiation processes (integration processes) are
suitable, which return the starting values after an integration followed by
differentiation or a differentiation with a subsequent integration.

Mathematical Calculation
The differentiation method in accordance with ECE R94 is (cf. VC):
d
8 ( Y [ t + t ] Y [ t t ] ) ( Y [ t + 2t ] Y [ t 2t ] )
y [ t ] = V [ t ] = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------dt
12t
with:

time interval between the single measurements in seconds

Determining Input Values

Relevant Laws and Regulations


ECE R94, Annex 4, 6.2
Directive 96/79/EG, Annex II, Appendix 2, 6.2
SAE J1727, 3.1

5-20

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

CFC filters
CFC is the abbreviation for Channel Frequency Class

Description
The CFC filters are analog or digital filters. The filters can be phased or
un-phased. The filter types usually used are listed in Table 5-1.
Table 5-1. Filter Types

Filter type
CFC60

CFC180

CFC600

CFC1000

Filter parameters
3 dB limit frequency

100Hz

Stop damping

-30 dB

Sampling frequency

at least 600 Hz

3 dB limit frequency

300Hz

Stop damping

-30 dB

Sampling frequency

at least 1800 Hz

3 dB limit frequency

1,000Hz

Stop damping

-40 dB

Sampling frequency

at least 6 khz

3 dB limit frequency

1,650Hz

Stop damping

-40 dB

Sampling frequency

at least 10 khz

Mathematical Calculation
In accordance with SAE J211, a 4-channel Butterworth low pass with linear
phase and special starting conditions is used as a digital filter.
The filter sequence is described by the following difference equation:
Y [ t ] = a0 X [ t ] + a1 X [ t 1 ] + a2 X [ t 2 ] + b1 Y [ t 1 ] + b2 Y [ t 2 ]

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

5-21

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

The filter constants are calculated in accordance with:

w d = 2 CFC 2, 0775
T
sin w d --2w a = -----------------T
cos w d --2
2

wa
a 0 = ----------------------------------2
1 + 2w a + w a
a 1 = 2a 0
a2 = a0
2

2 ( wa 1 )
b 1 = ----------------------------------2
1 + 2w a + w a
2

1 + 2w a w
b 2 = ---------------------------------------a2
1 + 2w a + w a
with:
X[t]

Input data sequence

Y[t]

Filtered output data sequence

a0, a1, a2, b1, b2

Filter constants varying with CFC

Sampling rate in seconds

The difference equation describes a two-channel filter: To realize a


four-channel filter, the data of the two-channel filter has to run twice: once
forwards and once backwards, to prevent phase displacements.

5-22

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Chapter 5

Note

Description of Additional Criteria

The filter constant wd is calculated differently to SAE J211 in the ISO 6487 sample

code:

5
w d = 2 CFC 1, 25 --3
is

w d = 2 CFC 2, 0833

Determining Input Values

Relevant Laws and Regulations

SAE J211, 9.4.1


SAE J211, 3.95, Appendix C
ISO 6487, 4.5
ISO 6487, 5.8

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

5-23

Chapter 5

Description of Additional Criteria

FIR100 filter
FIR is the abbreviation for Finite Impulse Response

Description
FIR filters are digital filters.

Mathematical Calculation
Filter characteristics in accordance with FMVSS 214, S6.13.5.4

Passband frequency

100 Hz

Stopband frequency

189 Hz

Stopband gain)

-50 dB

Passband ripple

0.0225 dB

NHTSA algorithm for FIR100:

CFC180 unphased

Subsampling to 1600 Hz

Removal of bias

FIR filters in accordance with filter characteristic FMVSS 214

Oversampling to original sampling rate

Determining Input Values

Relevant Laws and Regulations


FMVSS 214, S6.13.5.4
SAE J1727, 3.5

5-24

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Legislation and Directives

The legislation and directives are written as follows:


European Legislation

ECE-R80 (May 2001)


ECE-R94 (June 2000)
Directive 96/79/EG (16th December 1996)
ECE-R95 (May 2001)
Directive 96/27/EG (20th May 1996)

American Legislation
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (49 CFR Part 571)

FMVSS 201 (10/2001)


FMVSS 208 (5/2000)
FMVSS 214
Current American stipulations are also available in the Internet:
www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr

Standards and Directives

SAE J1727 (8.96)


SAE J1733 (12.94)
SAE J2052 (3.90)
SAE J211 (3.95)
ISO 6487 (07.87)
ISO TS 13499:2002
DIN 75302
EN 1789

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

6-1

Chapter 6

Legislation and Directives

EuroNCAP (Version 4.0, January 2003); European New Car


Assessment Programme, www.euroencap.com/testprocedures

Robert A. Denton, Sign Conventions for Load Cells (S.A.E. J-211)


Rev. 27AUG02

6-2

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

6-3

Head res 3ms


Head vert. 3ms
Neck flex/extens.
Thorax T1
Thorax T12

HIC, HPC

Temperature
(measurement time)
SAFETY
CRITERIAa

Pos. 6 - behind
passenger

Pos. 4 - behind driver

Front seat pass.

Driver

Restraint syst.
PASSENGERS

Test weight

Velocity
Barrier
Overlapping
Impact angle

Validity

Type

Limits

/ 1368 kg

1000 (HIC36)
700 (HIC15)

190/57 Nm

HIII
5, 50, 95%
HIII
12m, 3-year,
6-year
HIII
12m, 3-year,
6-year
20.55
-22.22C

18.89 -25.56C

1000

HIII -50%
US-SID

US-SID;
Spec.

1,368 kg

56/61 km/h
Rigid/def. bar.
100%/
0

1972

1000

80g

MOC, Fz

18-26C

Euro-SID

950 kg

90

50 km/h
Mob.Def.Bar.

From 1998

Side ODB

ECE-R95
96/27/EG

1000

19-22C

HIII - 50 %

HIII - 50 %

56 km/h
Def. bar.
40%
0
Addit.
weight
X

From 1998

Front ODB

Front/
Side-Impact

HIII
5, 50, 95%

NPRM
18.9.98
54 km/h
Mob.Def.Bar

27

NPRM
12.5.00
56/48 km/h
Fixed bar.
100%
0

NCAP

Active

Side Impact

Front Impact

ECE-R94
96/79/EG

Passive

FMVSS214

FMVSS208

America

20g
MOC, Fz

80ga

1000 (HIC36)b

19-22 (>5h)

P11/2

P3

HIII - 50 %

HIII - 50 %

64 km/h
Def. bar.
40%
0
Addit.
weight
X

From 2003

Front Impact

EuroNCAP

Europe

Table 6-1. Criteria for Different Test Types

1000 (HIC36)

18-26C (>5h)

P3

P11/2

80g

1000 (HIC36)

18-26C
(>5h)

Euro-SID
ES-2 from
11/02

Euro-SID
ES-2 from
11/02

950 kg
X

29 km/h carrier
Pole

90

From 2003

Side Pole

EuroNCAP

50 km/h
Mob.Def.Bar.

90

From 2003

Side Impact

EuroNCAP

AMuS

1000
80g

80g

50%/Eurosid

50%/Eurosid

1000

HIII-50%/Eu
rosid

HIII-50%/Eu
rosid

950 kg

50%
90

40%
0
Plus luggage

55 km/h

Front/ Side
Impact

60 km/h

Front/ Side
Impact

ADAC

Other methods

6-4

Data Processing Vehicle Safety Workgroup Crash Analysis Criteria Version 1.6.2

85/90g

130g

Side Impact

Front Impact

60g

76.2 mm
1.0 m/s

10 kN

FMVSS214

FMVSS208

America

130g

10 kN

Front/
Side-Impact

60g/

76.2 mm
1.0 m/s /
85/90g

NCAP

a.Children have different injury criteria


b.The limit values differ according to vehicle equipment and head contact.

Ribs
ChestRes 3ms
Head vert. 3ms
Chest compression
VC
TTI
Abdomen
Pelvis
Pubic Symphysis
Femur
Knee
Lower leg
Tibia Index

Type

60g

50 mm
1.0 m/s

Force/Time
15 mm
8 kN
1,3

Front ODB

ECE-R94
96/79/EG

42.0 mm
1.0 m/s

2.5 kN

6 kN

Side ODB

ECE-R95
96/27/EG

60g
30g
50 mm
1.0 m/s

Force/Time
15 mm
8 kN
1,3

Front Impact

EuroNCAP

Europe

42.0 mm
1.0 m/s

2.5 kN

6 kN

Side Impact

EuroNCAP

Side Pole

EuroNCAP
Front/ Side
Impact

60g

50 /42mm
1.0 m/s

2.5 kN

6 kN
Force/Time
15 mm
8 kN
1,3

ADAC
Front/ Side
Impact

60g

50 /42mm
1.0 m/s/

2.5 kN

6 kN
Force/Time
15 mm
8 kN
1,3

AMuS

Other methods

S-ar putea să vă placă și