Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Functional requirements
The GMDSS regulations (chapter IV of the International SOLAS Convention), require that every
GMDSS equipped ship shall be capable of;
1. transmitting ship-to-shore Distress Alerts by at least two separate and
independent means, each using a different radio communication service;
2. receiving shore-to-ship Distress Alerts;
3. transmitting and receiving ship-to-ship Distress Alerts;
4. transmitting and receiving search and rescue co-ordinating communications;
5. transmitting and receiving on-scene communications;
6. transmitting and receiving locating signals;
7. receiving maritime safety information;
8. transmitting and receiving general radiocommunications relating to the
management and operation of the vessel; and
9. transmitting and receiving bridge-to-bridge communications.
Application
The GMDSS applies to vessels subject to the SOLAS Convention - that is:
Commercial vessels of 300 Gross Registered Tons (GRT) and above, engaged on
international voyages.
The GMDSS became mandatory for such vessels as at February 1, 1999.
Commercial vessels under 300 GRT, or those above 300 GRT engaged on domestic voyages only
are subject to the requirements of their Flag State. Some Flag States have incorporated GMDSS
requirements into their domestic marine radio legislation - however many have not.
Equipment requirements
As discussed above, equipment fit requirements vary according to the Sea Area(s) a vessel
operates in or through.
It should be noted that the requirements are cumulative in nature - ie: an A4 vessel is also
equipped, by definition, with equipment for A1, A2 and A3 Sea Areas.
In areas where A1 Services are provided, coastal vessels are only required to fit VHF equipment,
provided of course that they remain within the declared Sea Area - normally within 20 to 30
nautical miles of the coast.
Vessels that trade further from land are required to carry MF equipment, in addition to VHF.
Ocean going vessels fit VHF, MF, HF and Inmarsat equipment.
The process is depicted below:
However, it should be noted that the above examples assume a linear transition from A1 to A4
sea areas - in many areas of the world, (such as Australia) A3 areas extend right up to the coast
line. GMDSS vessels operating in or through those areas are required to fit A3 equipment.
Shore Infrastructure
Each of the countries contracting to the SOLAS Convention (basically, all of the world's major
shipping nations) are required to enforce the equipping of vessels sailing under their flag with
GMDSS and also provide suitable GMDSS shore-based infrastructure.
The shore based infrastructure (i.e.: Coast Radio Stations) may be provided in conjunction with
neighbouring states.
Let's take a closer look at operational requirements.....
Operational requirements
General
The GMDSS enables a ship in distress to send an alert using various radio systems. These
systems are designed such that the alert has a very high probability of being received by either
shore rescue authorities and/or other vessels in the area.
Equipment performing GMDSS functions must be simple to operate and (wherever appropriate)
be designed for unattended operation.
Distress Alerts must be able to be initiated from the position from which the ship is normally
Minimum requirements
GMDSS ships are required to carry the following minimum equipment:
A VHF radio installation capable of transmitting DSC on channel 70, and radiotelephony on
channels 16, 13 and 6. (see Note 1).
One SART if under 500 GRT, 2 SARTs if over 500 GRT.
Two portable VHF transceivers for use in survival craft if under 500 GRT, three if over 500
GRT.
A NAVTEX receiver, if the ship is engaged on voyages in any area where a NAVTEX service is
provided.
An Inmarsat EGC receiver, if the ship is engaged on voyages in any area of Inmarsat
coverage where MSI services are not provided by NAVTEX or HF NBDP (see note 2).
A 406 MHz EPIRB
Note 1 - Voice watch is effectively required on channel 16 until further notice.
Note 2 - in practice, this means that all GMDSS A3 and A4 vessels are required to carry at
least one Inmarsat C system.
OR
An MF/HF radio installation capable of transmitting and receiving on all distress and safety
frequencies in the (marine) bands between 1,605 kHz and 27,500 kHz using DSC,
radiotelephony and NBDP.
An MF/HF DSC watchkeeping receiver capable of maintaining DSC watch on 2,187.5 kHz,
8,414.5 kHz and on at least one of the distress and safety DSC frequencies 4,207.5 kHz, 6,312
kHz, 12,577 kHz or 16,804.5 kHz; at any time, it shall be possible to select any of these DSC
distress and safety frequencies
AND
The batteries are required to have a capacity to power the equipment for 1 hour on ships with an
emergency generator, and 6 hours on ships not fitted with an emergency generator.
The batteries must be charged by an automatic charger, which is also required to be powered
from the main and emergency generators.
Changeover from AC to battery supply must be automatic, and effected in such a way that any
any data held by the equipment is not corrupted (ie: "no break").
Operator qualifications
There are a number of different types of GMDSS qualifications, as follows:
First Class Radio-Electronic Certificate;
Second Class Radio-Electronic Certificate; and
GMDSS General Operator's Certificate
The First and Second Radio-Electronic Certificates are diploma and associate diploma level
technical qualifications. They are designed for Ship's Radio-Electronic Officers, who sail on
GMDSS ships which use the option of at-sea electronic maintenance.
The GMDSS General Operator's Certificate is a non-technical operator qualification, designed
for Navigating Officers.
The GMDSS General Operator's Certificate is normally awarded after a ten day course and
examination.
Let's have a look at Digital Selective Calling (DSC)
The first three digits of the MMSI are known as the Maritime Identification Digits (MID). The
MID represents the country of registration of the vessel, or the country in which the DSC shore
station is located. MIDs are allocated on an international basis by the ITU, in much the same
way as a callsign prefix.
The MID list may be found here (opens in new window).
Formation of MMSI's
MMSIs allocated to merchant vessels are normally allocated with three trailing zero's.
Those allocated to recreational craft have two or one trailing zero, Coast Station MMSI's are
formed with two leading zero's, those allocated to SAR aircraft use 111 as the first three digits,
hand held radios have 8 as a leading digit and Man Overboard beacons have their own code
structure, starting with 972.
For example:
Typical Australian merchant vessel MMSI- 503001000
where:
503 is the Australian MID;
and
01000 is the individual ship number
where:
503 is the Australian MID; and
0001 is the individual Coast Station number
MMSI databases
The ITU operate an international web-based data base of MMSI's, known as the Maritime
Mobile Access and Retrieval System (MARS).
The Australian MMSI list may be found here.
DSC equipment
GMDSS DSC equipment is normally comprised of a stand alone control unit, with an alphanumeric display screen and a keyboard on which to compose messages.
To transmit a DSC call, a GMDSS operator enters the required commands to identify the station
(or stations) with which communication is desired, the priority (DISTRESS, URGENT, SAFETY
or ROUTINE) and the purpose of the call.
Once the call is composed, the CALL button is pressed on the DSC controller, and the
information is sent to the associated transmitter for transmission.
All DSC systems provide complete remote control of the associated transmitter - the selected
DSC frequency information is fed to the transmitter over a serial control link from the DSC
controller.
The whole process is automated - the DSC system instructs the transmitter to change to the
required DSC channel, the transmitter changes channel and (in the case of MF/HF systems)
tunes its antenna system. The transmitter then signals a ready command to the DSC controller,
which sends the information for broadcasting. The entire process takes only 3 to 5 seconds.
DSC controllers are also required to be interfaced to GPS receivers for automatic updating of
position and time information. This information is automatically included in distress calls.
DSC controllers are also required to be equipped with a DISTRESS button, which allows the
transmission of a distress call with minimum delay. The button is required to be protected by a
cover, and also can only be activated after "2 separate and independent actions".
Videos of DSC traffic being received and sent on Coast Station equipment may be
found here.
OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES
The official guide to DSC procedures is contained in ITU recommendation ITU-R M.541-9. The
complete text of the recommendation may be found here.
IMO have issued a circular which contains further clarifications on DSC procedures:
IMO Comsar Circular 25 - Procedure for responding to distress alerts by ships.
(dated March 15th 2001 - includes flow chart.)
NAVTEX
Introduction
The NAVTEX system is used for the automatic broadcast of localised Maritime Safety
Information (MSI) using Radio Telex (also known as Narrow Band Direct Printing, or NBDP).
The system mainly operates in the Medium Frequency radio band just above and below the old
500 kHz Morse Distress frequency. System range is generally 300 or so nautical miles from the
transmitter.
The NAVTEX system is designed to be used in GMDSS Sea Area A2, and is utilised mainly by
those countries with relatively small areas of coastline and/or sea areas to cover.
Major areas of NAVTEX coverage include the Mediterranean Sea, the North Sea, coastal areas
around Japan and areas around the North American continent.
Frequency of operation
The NAVTEX system uses three broadcast frequencies:
518 kHz - the main NAVTEX channel
490 kHz - used for broadcasts in local languages (ie: non-English)
4209.5 kHz - allocated for NAVTEX broadcasts in tropical areas - not widely used at the
moment.
All broadcasts from stations within the same NAVAREA must be coordinated on a time sharing
basis to eliminate interference.
In addition, power outputs from each station are adjusted to control the range of each
broadcast. This is particularly important during night-time hours, as Medium Frequencies
always travel further after dark.
NAVTEX message format
NAVTEX messages are transmitted using the following format:
in which
ZCZC defines the end of the phasing period,
the B1 character is a letter (A-Z) identifying the transmitter coverage area,
the B2 character is a letter (A-Z) for each type of message.
B3B4 is a two-character serial number for each message, starting with 01 except in special cases
where the serial number 00 is used.
The transmitter identification character (B1) is a single letter allocated to each NAVTEX shore
station transmitter. NAVTEX receivers allow the operator to accept or reject messages from any
station, based on this single letter code.
The subject indicator character (B2) is also single letter code which serves to identify the
message subject. NAVTEX receivers also allow the operator to reject certain messages based on
the subject indicator character. However, messages concerning Navigational Warnings,
Meteorological Warnings, and Search And Rescue information can not be rejected.
Subject indicator characters assigned to the NAVTEX system are as follows:
A - Navigational warnings
B - Meteorological warnings
C - Ice reports
D - Search and rescue information
E - Meteorological forecasts
F - Pilot service messages
G - Decca messages
H - Loran messages
I - Omega messages
J - Satnav messages
Why DSC?
DSC greatly improves your chances of getting a distress message through to the rescue
authorities and surrounding vessels.
A simple push button operation sends a distress call.
All GMDSS vessels in range receive the call directly.
If you are called, an alarm will sound.
In addition, DSC automates your radio - no more listening to hash and noise on HF
nor idlechatter. The radio remains quiet until you are called.
HF DSC for yachts
HF radios with built in DSC suitable for yachts and small craft are readily available.
The Icom IC-M801E is a popular choice for cruising sailors.
The well known marine radio station Brunei Bay Radio has produced an excellent series of
articles on use of HF DSC by yachts:
More information on VHF DSC for small vessels may be found at the VHF DSC information web
site.
Although SARTs are primarily designed to be used in lifeboats or liferafts, they can be deployed
on board a ship, or even in the water.
SARTs are powered by integral batteries which are designed to provide up to 96 hours of
operation.
Operation
When activated, a SART responds to a searching radar interrogation by generating a swept
frequency signal which is displayed on a radar screen as a line of 12 dots extending outward
from the SARTs position along its line of bearing.
The spacing between each dot is 0.6 nautical miles.
As the searching vessel approaches the SART, the radar display will change to wide arcs. These
may eventually change to complete circles as the SART becomes continually triggered by the
searching ship's radar.
Although not an actual SART response, this radar picture gives an impression of how a SART
signal would be displayed
Some slight position error will also be caused by the SART switching from receive to transmit
mode.
SARTs will also provide a visual and audible indication to users when interrogated by a
searching radar.
Range
The range achievable from a SART is directly proportional to its height above the water.
A SART mounted at 1m (ie: in a liferaft) should be able to be detected at 5 nautical miles by a
ship's radar mounted at 15m.
The same SART should be able to be detected at 30 nautical miles by an aircraft flying at 8000
feet.
GMDSS carriage requirements
GMDSS vessels from 300 to 500 GRT are required to carry 1 SART, and vessels over 500 GRT
are required to carry 2.
AIS SARTS
Manufacturers have recently developed SARTs which work in conjunction with the VHF
Automatic Identification System (AIS).
IMO has recognised AIS SARTs as being equivalent to radar SARTs for SOLAS carriage - i.e.
ships can substitute an AIS SART for a radar SART.
The AIS SART comprises a two channel VHF AIS transmitter and a GPS receiver integrated into
one waterproof enclosure - which is very similar in size to a traditional radar SART.
AIS SART technical paramaters are defined in IEC Standard 61097-14. These can be
summarised as follows:
Power output: 1 W EIRP
Transmitting frequencies: AIS channels 1 and 2
GPS receiver: 20 channel
Battery capacity: 96 hrs
Operating temperature: -20 to +55 C
The AIS SART transmits a sequence of 8 messages a minute. Each message is transmitted in a
26 millisecond time slot. 4 messages are transmitted on AIS channel 1 (161.975 MHz) and 4 on
AIS channel 2 (162.025 MHz). This time frame is designed to maximise the period that the
SART will be visable to other ships AIS receivers. Reception of only 1 of the 8 messages will
enable accuratle location of the SART.
AIS SARTs are coded with a unique 9 digit identification code beginning with 970 - very
Whilst this solution presents no real problems for Europe, with its multitude of coast stations,
and predominantly short voyages, it is next to useless for the vast expanses of the Pacific and
Indian Oceans, where voyages of thousands of miles are undertaken by quite small vessels.
The result is that, in many parts of the world, there are two separate maritime safety
communication systems running in parallel.
Some nations are even maintaining their Morse Code services on 500 kHz...
Whilst IMO have extended the requirement for merchant vessels to maintain channel 16 VHF
watchkeeping, they have not continued the medium range compatibility provisions that existed
between GMDSS and non-GMDSS vessels on 2 MHz under the pre-GMDSS system.
What this means is that there are no direct communications available between GMDSS and nonGMDSS vessels outside of VHF range (about 20 nautical miles).
A merchant ship can therefore sail by a small vessel in distress, and vice-versa.
The GMDSS pundits would have us believe that the shore based GMDSS infrastructure will solve
this problem by relaying ship-shore alerts from GMDSS vessels to their non-equipped
counterparts.
Again, this is fine in theory for Europe, but what if there is no GMDSS-compatible shore
infrastructure in place?
How are the alerts to be received, and then re-broadcast on non-GMDSS systems?
Alerts go unheard, and people die.
The problem is exacerbated by the separation of commercial and distress/safety functions
brought about by the GMDSS.
Under the pre-GMDSS Morse and Radiotelephone systems, the distress and safety services
provided by Coast Radio Stations were subsidised to a certain extent by revenue from
commercial traffic (i.e.: telegrams and telephone calls).
The GMDSS has transferred the great majority of the world's maritime commercial traffic to
Inmarsat and other satellite systems.
Accordingly, many Coast Radio Stations are now forced to rely directly on funding from their
Governments and SAR agencies. Unfortunately, some developing countries have precious little
revenue to allocate to Coast Radio Networks.
Even Coast Stations in developed countries are feeling the effects of the GMDSS - many of the
world's major Coast Radio Stations have closed or severely rationalised their services.
A traditional coast radio station transmitter hall....now gone the way of the dodo, alas...
Some countries are now providing SAR-related services only from their stations.
What is being done?
To their credit, the IMO and the ITU are acting on the problem of GMDSS shore infrastructure
in developing nations.
The IMO are developing a regional SAR fund to assist in the development of GMDSS shore
stations, and the ITU have sent technical experts to many regions to design GMDSS facilities.
The IMO also commissioned the design and costing (by Dunstan and Associates) of a complete
GMDSS Coast Radio network for the Pacific region.
Unfortunately, these initiatives may not come into effect for some time.
Continue to Part 2 for more problems and possible solutions.
The DSC mess
The GMDSS DSC system, particularly on HF, is plagued by an appallingly high false alert rate in excess of 99.5%.
This situation has reached critical levels, to the point that there is talk of discontinuing DSC...
The root of the problem is that there is no real central operational and administrative authority
to oversee the DSC system - the operation of DSC systems on vessels is effectively
managed/regulated by individual Flag States.
The Inmarsat system used to suffer from a false alert rate approaching that of DSC - Inmarsat
instituted a strong and well managed program to combat the problem, with the result that the
Inmarsat false alert rate has dropped to negligible levels.
The situation has reached the point that DSC has become an impediment to safety at sea.
Equipment complexity
Much of the DSC equipment available today is far too complex to operate.
In addition, the operating routines vary significantly from brand to brand, such that a user
trained on one type of equipment will have considerable difficulty operating another.
DSC controller operation is complicated by the inclusion of many (unnecessary) commercial
functions - DSC controllers can be used to make automatic telephone calls via suitably equipped
HF Coast Stations. Unfortunately, there are very few, if any, Coast Stations that offer this
service.
Many controllers are equipped with small display screens - this makes operation very difficult.
There was a move some time ago at IMO* to mandate a minimum DSC display screen size of 4
lines by 64 characters per line.
This recommendation was modified to require that a minimum of 160 characters be displayed in
two or more lines. These modifications have taken effect for all new equipment fitted to ships as
from 1 January 2000.
There is nothing in the IMO performance standards to prevent manufacturers using a Personal
Computer type system for DSC, i.e.: one with a large display screeen - however none have been
produced, probably because of cost.
The modifications also mandated connection of a GPS and also the provision of an alarm to
indicate that no position data is received from the GPS or, in the case of manual input, the
position information is over 4 hours old. Any position information not updated for more than
23 hours is also required to be erased from the system.
Some manufacturers are producing simple to use DSC systems, with large display screens.
It is hoped that this trend will spread.
*instigated by the author
A new DSC standard is here
After seven years of effort, ITU and IEC have at long last finished the final standards defining a
simplified DSC radio, with a standardized software interface, free of most of the unnecessary
alarms and strange operation that has plagued the system since its inception.
The new standard is designed to radically simplify the man-machine interface, and automate
most functions.
Revision 13 (the latest) may be found on the ITU web site.
False alerts
Equipment complexity is leading to an unprecedented number of false alerts being transmitted.
The majority of these are caused by human error, however some have been known to be
deliberately sent out of ignorance by system installers - they program in a bogus MMSI, and just
push the distress button to see if the system works....!
Such alerts are relatively easy to spot - the position is often suspect (12.34s 123.45e, for
example), and the MMSI is often equally dubious (123456789, 111111111, 222222222, etc).
Can the system be too effective ?
HF DSC's effectiveness and world-wide range is leading to its downfall.
Alerts are often received from stations quite literally on the other side of the world. It is not
uncommon to receive a 12 MHz DSC alert from the North Sea in the South Pacific....
Whilst this is quite interesting from a technical perspective, it is a complete waste of time from a
SAR viewpoint.
Compare the DSC system with Inmarsat - with Inmarsat, alerts are directed straight to the RCC surrounding ships are only alerted via a carefully controlled re-broadcast from the RCC.
Although HF DSC is designed for ship-shore alerting, it operates in a broadcast mode - all ships
monitoring the frequency receive the call, and all are therefore able to relay it......
Users are too enthusiastic...
The ITU operational guidelines for HF DSC require that, basically, a vessel receiving a HF DSC
alert is to immediately set watch on the corresponding R/T or NBDP channel for the band in
which the DSC alert was received and await communications from the vessel in distress.
However, this is not happening - vessels are relaying HF DSC alerts indiscriminately.
Ironically, the original distress alert being relayed is, in itself, probably false...
This is leading to serious congestion of the DSC channels - to the point that the original alert has
become so corrupted that it appears a Coast Station is in distress !!
Unfortunately, DSC is becoming an end in itself, rather than a simple alerting mechanism.
Many ships fail to adequately consider the information in a received alert before relaying - an
alert from a ship with an obviously false MMSI (such as 123456789) should not be relayed.
Perusal of the international MID list reveals that the following MID numbers are not allocated:
000 123 222 333 444 777 888 999
It is very difficult for a ship's operator to change his/her DSC system's MMSI at sea, so one can
safety assume that MMSI's with the above MID's must be bogus.
Users receiving a DSC distress alert from a vessel with a MMSI starting with any of these MID's
can therefore IGNORE the alert - it can not be genuine.
Misplaced enthusiasm does not stop at the shoreline either.... Many Coast Radio Stations are
also guilty of jumping in too quickly and relaying or acknowledging alerts that are clearly out of
their area.
Continue to part 3 for some solutions.
distress alerts).
These simple steps will go a long way to improving the current chaotic situation with HF DSC.
The IMO has finally released DSC flow charts to serve as a simple guide for shipboard users. A
link to these charts may be found at the bottom of the DSC page.
Whilst the charts are not as clear and simple as they might be, at least they are a step in the right
direction.
Some more ideas on sorting out the GMDSS may be found here.