Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
To cite this article: Ian Westbury , SvenErik Hansn , Pertti Kansanen & Ole Bjrkvist (2005)
Teacher Education for Researchbased Practice in Expanded Roles: Finland's experience,
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49:5, 475-485, DOI: 10.1080/00313830500267937
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313830500267937
a
c
Preparing teachers for a research-based professionalism has been the central mission of teacher
education in Finland since the mid-1970s. More recently, as a result of such national policy
developments as school-based curriculum development and local decision-making, the conception
of teachers work and professionalism has expanded. Drawing on experience within the teacher
bo Akademi University, this paper
education programmes at the University of Helsinki and A
discusses some of the programmatic issues that these developments have raised in class-teacher, i.e.
elementary, teacher education programmes. We focus in particular firstly on the research thesis
that is a part of every teacher education programme in Finland, and the hallmark of the researchbased professional ideal; and, secondly on the emerging issues that derive from the need to
incorporate the expanded understanding of the teachers role within the curriculum of teacher
education.
Introduction
Over the past 20 or so years teacher education in Finland has gone through a process
of reconstruction which has been directed, most fundamentally, by the quest for a
stable research-oriented approach to teaching, grounded in the idea of the teacher as
a professional. Teacher education has been consolidated in faculties of education
in eight of Finlands universities and preparation for elementary teachers reorganised
as a 4-year programme leading to a masters degree, involving in all cases a thesis.1
Recently new demands around teacher education have emerged. There is a call for
*Corresponding author. Department of Applied Sciences of Education, PO Box 9
(Siltavuorenpenger 20), FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland. Email: pertti.kansanen@
helsinki.fi
ISSN 0031-3831 (print)/ISSN 1430-1170 (online)/05/050475-11
2005 Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research
DOI: 10.1080/00313830500267937
476
I. Westbury et al.
477
478
I. Westbury et al.
presented as a totality. Thus, there is practice teaching in every year and every study
period, and every practice teaching period is combined with theoretical and research
studies related to the topic of the practice period. The reading of research texts,
mini-studies undertaken by students, and seminars in which these texts and studies
are discussed, are designed to support teaching practice.
In the second year of the programme, for example, when students take courses in
both the theory of teaching and assessment, the idea of instructional evaluation is
highlighted, and approached in the following way: Although learning is not a direct
consequence of teaching, the outcomes of teaching-studying-learning need to be
evaluated in relation to the aims and goals of the curriculum. From this viewpoint,
the teaching process seeks to achieve clearly defined outcomes. Further, the choice of
one or another teaching method or approach presumes a weighing of their strengths
and weaknesses in terms of outcomes. Such assessments should be at the core of
every teachers thinking because it gives the teacher the capacity to develop, and
justify, the arguments behind decisions about teaching approaches.
To take up some different issues, how should a teacher get to know his or her
students?one of the themes of the first year of the Helsinki programme.
Discussions with students, formal interviews, and observation techniques offer
methods for securing comprehensive descriptions and understanding. Such
approaches presuppose, of course, an understanding of qualitative research methods
and their background assumptions, as well as the psychological theory and principles
developed in parallel coursework. Likewise, the teacher is always working with the
values behind the curriculum and questions around the purposes of education pose
issues which require systematic analysis. Philosophical studies provide the necessary
understanding for a teachers curriculum-making, assessment, and evaluation.
The idea of an autonomous teacher who is able to think and act on the basis of
theory and research, and to justify educational decisions using formal, systematic
arguments, presupposes an ability and a readiness to read the professional and
research literature critically. Teachers must be able to select what to read, evaluate
what they read, and appropriate what is useful or significant from that reading for
their practice. Although pedagogical thinking typically (and perhaps necessarily)
mixes intuitive and formal arguments, a research-based attitude makes it possible to
steer thinking and decisions towards practices which are grounded in a wider, and
hopefully more systematised, experience than the circumscribed worlds of
immediate places and settings.
The culminating experience of the programme, the writing of the research thesis,
takes place over a 2-year period, beginning in the third year of the programme. As
they prepare their projects, students present and discuss their developing ideas and
their more formal research proposals in seminars, and complete methodological
studies in parallel courses. Wherever possible, the theme of the thesis, as illustrated
in Figure 1, is chosen from personal experiences during practice teaching.
To summarise, the research-based teacher education that is the heart of Finnish
teacher education and formalised by the writing of the masters thesis, is directed at
479
Figure 1. Titles of some recent pre-service masters theses from the University of Helsinki
preparing students for both critical thinking and autonomous decision making, and
thus for action guided by a gradually elaborated practical theory. The underlying
intention of the programme as a whole is to make an explicit demand on students to
acquire both knowledge about the research basis for the education they are
experiencing and the skills necessary to undertake their own research. Course
readings are selected because of their theoretical and methodological quality and
significance. In other words, the aim of the coursework is to help our students
acquire a research-based understanding and way of reasoning about schooling. They
learn how to discuss and argue with a constant reference to research, and not rely on
everyday thinking and magical or mystical arguments.
The Integration of Theory, Research, and Practice
In all forms of teacher education, in all countries, theoretically and practically
oriented studies are intertwinedwith many people, representing pedagogy, the
subject matters, and schools involved. In the different phases of programmes one or
another group of stakeholders, groups with different roles and different priorities,
highlight one or another perspective on the teaching process and its context. These
differences are often interpreted as reflections of a fundamental division between
educational theory/research and practice.
Thus in Finland, despite integrated programmatic structures like that of the
University of Helsinki, class, that is, both educational theory and research, and
field are typically separated, both spatially and in styles of thought. The theoretical
foundations for teaching and subject studies are taught in classrooms on university
campuses, while practice-oriented preparation is located in training and field schools
with their own staffs and mentorsand missions. Many see this spatial and
organisational differentiation as creating a dichotomy, which remains unabridged,
between the necessary components of programmes. As Kosunen and Mikkola (2002,
480
I. Westbury et al.
p. 138) put it, Information does not travel between units, the demands made on
students are contradictory, the division of work in inappropriate, and the scientific
premise of the other discipline is publicly questioned.
As this comment suggests, overcoming the perceived gulf between theory,
research, and practice in pre-service teacher preparation is seen a widespread
problem (Buchberger, De Corte, Groombridge, & Kennedy, 1994; Jussila & Saari,
2000; Kosunen & Mikkola, 2002) and there have been, and are, many projects
aiming at articulating and realigning theory and research and school practice more
closely. These projects seek to integrate teaching practice more firmly with researchoriented preparation and/or to develop an integrated theory/research and practice
model of teacher.
One example of such a pattern of programme development can be illustrated by
bo Akademi University. When the research interests of
the ELMA project at the A
some teacher educators in the Universitys Department of Teacher Education and
Practice School converged, an ambitious curriculum development project became
possible. The aim of the project was to investigate the mathematical thinking of
children in their first years at school, to adapt educational materials to pupils with
varying readiness, and to design a curriculum that would better take into account the
previous experiences and developmental stages of the pupils.
During three years of the ELMA project, pre-service students had the opportunity
to write a masters thesis closely connected with the project. By focusing the final
period of student teaching on mathematics (at that time student teaching normally
involved two subjects, one of which might be mathematics), and by adapting the
contents of the practice teaching period to the topic of a thesis, it was possible to
obtain sequences of lessons which were long enough to allow for the empirical testing
of hypotheses the students developed. Working in this way, the students had the
opportunity to explore the effects of ELMA-based teaching, both as a research
project and a curriculum development project. They were not obliged to adhere to
the ELMA philosophy in a strict fashion and they were able, if they chose, to develop
a critique of the projects theoretical foundations based on the empirical evidence
they gathered during student teaching. This kind of feedback was very useful for the
project as a whole and the theses prepared by Andersson and Eriksson (1989),
Romar and Sunabacka (1989), Stromberg and Villanen (1991) and Rehn (1992)
played an important role in predicting how the ELMA philosophy and the teaching
materials that were being developed would be received by teachers.
Emergent Developments and Issues
With this background in hand, let us now turn to a discussion of some emergent
developments and issues around teacher education in Finland. We will consider
bo Akademi University.
these issues in the context of the programme at A
As a result of the expansion of the teachers professional role following Finlands
decentralisation of both managerial and curricular decision making that we discussed
481
482
I. Westbury et al.
Akademi University programme has initiated two new courses, along with matching
practice periods, into its pre-service programme. One course, Teachers work, has
a major component addressing the curriculum and curriculum work, although the
central focus continues the traditional emphasis on the didactics of the curriculum.
The second course, Curriculum theory and work, seeks to explicitly connect
theoretical perspectives with school-based curriculum work. In the practice
component associated with this course students become acquainted with on-going
school-based curriculum work by way of visits, collecting and discussing curriculum
material, and discussions with teachers and heads of their experiences.
Competence level 4 (C4): This level highlights the role of collective reflection as a verbal
activity, implying both interaction and the internalising of a professional language
(Carlgren, 1999; Hansen, 1998). Such professional language is derived from the
theoretical and research discourses of education, but is operationalised by and in
teachers own understanding.
As we identify these four levels of a teachers competence, two points are
highlighted. As we have noted, the traditional image of teacher competence has
centred on the levels on the teaching process (C1) and individual day-by-day
planning (C2). The contemporary Finnish image of the teachers role requires an
extended competenceto the levels of curriculum-making (C3) and collective
reflection (C4). However, in our experience, school-based curriculum work seems
to be a major problem for schools in Finland. It is extraordinarily difficult to create
focused and continuous collective discourse among school faculties.
As we see it, school-based curriculum work faces two main obstacles. One centres
around the structure of the school day: five to seven daily lessons, each of 45 minutes
followed by a 15-minute break. The attitude has developed among teachers that
tasks outside the classroom, that is, both individual planning and staff meetings, is not
part of the normal work. The other obstacle is more immediately important for
teacher education, and is linked to problems deriving from teachers inexperience in,
and preparation for, collaborative action and reflection. The pattern of one group/
one teacher forms the basis of the traditional, and much of the present-day,
structuring of the work.
As we have illustrated, departments of teacher education in Finland are beginning
to offer research- and theory-based pre-service courses in curriculum theory and
school-based curriculum work, and to connect these courses to curriculum work
during practice in training and field schools. However, students experience
difficulties in establishing a functioning dynamic interaction between the theoretical
basis for such work and practical activities. It is difficult for student teachers to get a
grip on what this work is; it is elusive, and well-hidden in the complexity of the
school reality. Even at training schools we see a lack of systematic exposure of
student teachers to school-based curriculum work.
bo Akademi University the aim is to systematically
In a current project at A
strengthen the ties in the training school between research- and theory-oriented
courses and teaching practice. One point of departure has been the explicit matching
483
Conclusion
In this paper we have provided a sketch of long-term and more recent trends in teacher
education in Finland. The sketch raises the question What is the reality like?of
research-based teacher education, of the linkage of theory and practice, and, most
particularly, of the capture within pre-service programmes of an expanded understanding of teachers work. We can only note that, although our perspective might overemphasise the intentional to the neglect of what some might regard as a more realistic
analysis, we are well aware of the problems we are facing in the day-to-day work.
However, the projects discussed here illustrate both our awareness of the problems that
remain to be solved and a kind of thinking about how these problems might be addressed.
It remains, of course, an open question whether such programme development can
meet the needs of the field and, in particular, of the emerging needs associated with
the changing role of the contemporary school, and of the contemporary teacher.
484
I. Westbury et al.
Notes
1. These programmes, which are based in departments of teacher education, now include a
major in education (55 credit hours), 35 credits of multidisciplinary subject-area studies, one
subject-area minor of 35 credits or two minors of 15 credits each, and a required research
thesis. We need to note that class-teacher education is very popular among Finnish students
with, nation-wide, only some 15% of applicants being admitted to programmes each year.
2. In Finland university-based practice schools are located in all universities which have teacher
education programmes. These schools function as normal comprehensive schools, following
the same curriculum as in other schools; however additional qualifications are expected of the
teachers, who become experienced supervisors of teacher education students. The so-called
field schools which are also used for practice teaching represent the everyday practice of
schools in general.
3. The faculty in the Universitys Department of Teacher Education and the lecturers in the
Practice School are jointly responsible for such work. This has meant increasing cooperationand new patterns of tensionand a deepening mutual understanding of each
others work.
References
Andersson, C., & Eriksson, A. (1989). Elevanpassad geometriundervisning i ak 2 [Teaching geometry
adapted to students in grade 2; in Swedish]. Unpublished masters thesis, Pedagogiska
bo Akademi University, Vasa, Finland.
fakulteten, A
Bergem, T., Bjorkqvist, O., Hansen, S.-E., Carlgren, I., & Hauge, T. E. (1997). Research on
teachers and teacher education in Scandinavia: A retrospective review. Scandinavian Journal
of Educational Research, 41, 433458.
Buchberger, F., De Corte, E., Groombridge, B., & Kennedy, M. (1994). Educational Studies and
Teacher Education in Finnish Universities 1994. A commentary by an international review team.
Division of Educational and Research Policy 14. Helsinki: Ministry of Education, Division of
Educational Policy.
Carlgren, I. (1999). Professionalism and teachers as designers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31,
4356.
Hansen, S.-E. (1997). Jag ar proffs pa det har: Om larares arbete under en tid av forandring [Im a
professional in this: About a teachers work at the time of confusion; in Swedish]. Rapporter
bo Akademi 16. Vasa, Sweden: Abo Akademi.
fran Pedagogiska fakulteten vid A
Hansen, S.-E. (1998). Preparing student teachers for curriculum making. Journal of Curriculum
Studies, 30, 165179.
Hansen, S.-E., & Wenestam, C.-G. (1999). On central dimensions of teacher educationa Finnish
perspective. In F. Buchberger, B. Hudson, P. Kansanen, & H. Seel (Eds.), Didaktik/
Fachdidaktik as Science(-s) of the Teaching Profession? (pp. 117125). Umea, Sweden: Thematic
Network of Teacher Education in Europe (TNTEE). Retrieved November 27, 2000 from
http://tntee.umu.se/publications/.
Jussila, J., & Saari, S. (Eds.). (2000). Teacher education as a future-moulding factor: International
evaluation of teacher education in Finnish universities. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Higher
Education Evaluation Council, Retrieved November, 15, 2000 from http://www.minedu.fi/
minedu/education/finheec/finheec.html.
Kansanen, P. (1991). Pedagogical thinking: The basic problem of teacher education. European
Journal of Education, 26, 251260.
Kansanen, P., Tirri, K., Meri, M., Krokfors, L., Husu, J., & Jyrhama, R. (2000). Teachers
pedagogical thinking: Theoretical landscapes, practical challenges. New York: Peter Lang.
485
Kosunen, T., & Mikkola, A. (2002). Building a science of teaching. How objectives and
reality meet in Finnish teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 25,
135150.
Rehn, A. (1992). Elevanpassad inlarning av brakbegreppet i ak 4 [Learning the concept of fractions,
adapted to students in grade 4; in Swedish]. Unpublished masters thesis, Pedagogiska
bo Akademi University, Vasa, Finland.
fakulteten, A
Romar, A.-B., & Sunabacka, S. (1989) Elevanpassad multiplikations- och divisionsinlarning i klass 2
[Learning multiplication and division, adapted to students in grade 2; in Swedish].
bo Akademi University, Vasa,
Unpublished masters thesis, Pedagogiska fakulteten, A
Finland.
Stromberg, C.-J., & Villanen, S. (1991). Integrering mellan matematik och teckning inom
geometristoffet i ak 4 [Integration of mathematics and drawing in 4th grade geometry; in
bo Akademi University,
Swedish]. Unpublished masters thesis, Pedagogiska fakulteten, A
Vasa, Finland.