Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Institutional Repository
Metadata Record:
Publisher:
https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/13708
c S.T. Pepper
AUTHOR/FILING TITLE
S T
. P(>l'{/'l.
- - .1
2 nfe 1997
-1 .'JUt 1994
.
2.7~ ~8'
1 ~ 1998
.8
1111111:lilllllilllllll
AUTHOR/FILING TITLE
. Pf'PIfi2.
S T
,
-- -- --- ---------------
~:1
"
(I
1\
1\
07 ,i1u.J994:
/ .. ,
~ S~'
.r" ~991 1 ~.1992
:~ 199?
- S JUl \99'
s _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ o_. _ _ _
_ _ _ __
5g.? 1 !l
.I!lt
1994
I
I
by
1988
Supervisor: M.Gilbert,
PhD
by S.T.Pepper,
-,
1988
'~
..
, I
if
of
~ unMlllily'
LlbraIy ,
T~o!ogy
DaI&
a.
J;
'to
~. ~oo IfS'01
I
I
CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY
This is to certify that
for
the
that
as
work
that
submitted
the original
specified
in
work
in
this
thesis,
is my own except
acknowledgements,
and
am responsible
this
or
any
other
been submitted
institution
degree.
S.T.Pepper
for
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Gilbert.
invaluable
her
assistance
Dr Marianne
unceasing
and
encouragement.
I
wi sh
Research
to
Council
ac know1 edge
and
Cookson
the
Group
Science
plc
Engineering
for
the
joint
Cookson Industrial
Materials Ltd.
Michae1
International
Ltd.
Hancock
for
and
advice
Dr
and
Robert
ECC
Higgs.
suggestions
during
the
to
their
laboratories.
The
technicians
at
IPTME.
Mr
Ray Owens
am especially grateful
and
especially
patience
during
thesis
-i-
to Miss G. A. Hunt
the
preparation
for her
of
this
ABSTRACT
The physical properties of rigid PVC products can be related
to
formulation,
A fuller
knowledge
of
these
relationships
can
lead
to
to
end
product.
optimisation
A
of
of
compositions
were
included
calcium
carbonate filler at levels upto 40 phr. These were dry blended and then
characterised
by
bulk
density
and
filler
content.
The
premix
was
a wide processing
fusion
level.
incorporat ing
two
extrudates
thermal
was
assessed
analYSiS,
sol vent
for
degree
of
fusion
by
The
The
mechanical
properties
of
the
pipe
were
composition
reduced
at
and
a
fusion
critical
level.
filler
fracture
Impact
content
weight
properties
and
assessed.
were
dramatically
ductile-brittle transition
temperatures were obtained for the extrudates by testing at low and high
temperatures.
Tensile
follow the
trends
observed
-11-
LIST OF SYMBOLS
6H A
Energy of endotherm A
6H a
Energy of endotherm B
6H F
Heat of fusion
6Hp
6HMAX
6P
Extrusion pressure
Pressure loss due to entrance effects
Viscous pressure loss
6q ..
Y axis sensitivity
Capillary diameter
Width of narrow portion of specimen
Elongation at break
Elongation at yield
Large radius
Fa
Fy
Test height
Thickness <preferred)
Fracture toughness
-111-
le
Extension at break
10
ly
Extension at yield
Capillary length
Sample mass
Impact mass
Extruder mass output
Velocity
Pressure
Pl
P2
Adaptor pressure
P3
Capillary radius
ae
GREL
av
Yield stress
s. d
S..
SS
Screw speed
Shear stress
Te,
TMl
Adaptor temperature
TM2
TM3
Screw temperature
TQ
Measured torque
TQo
yP
-iv-
TABLE OF CONTmiTS
Page No
Acknowledgements
ii
Abstract
List of Symbols
11i
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1
1. 1
LITERATURE REVIEW
INTRODUCTION
1. 1. 1 Poly<vinyl chloride>
1.2
1. 1. 3. 2 Tox1cit Y of VCM
1. 1. 3. 3 Polymerisation of VCM
1. 1. 4 Classification of PVC
1. 2.1
Introduction
1.2.2
Stabilisers
1.2.3
Lubricants
1.2.3.1 Introduction
10
12
13
1. 2. 4. 1 General requirements of a
PVC filler
13
14
1. 2. 4. 3 Manufacture of calcium
carbonate fillers
15
-y-
16
16
18
classification
19
1.4
1.5
20
23
1. 3. 1
23
1.3.2
PVC nomenclature
25
1.3.3
26
1. 3. 3. 1 PVC crystallinity
28
FUSION OF PVC
30
1. 4. 1
Fusion mechanisms
31
1.4.2
Assessment of fusion
37
1. 4. 2. 1 Microscopy
38
38
39
40
42
45
46
1. 5. 1
Dry blending
46
1.5.2
Extrusion of UPVC
46
screw extruders
1.5.2.2 Twin screw extruders
1.5.3
46
47
48
52
53
-vi-
CHAPTER 2
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
2. 1
INTRODUCTION
56
2.2
PVC FORMULATION
56
2. 2. 1
PVC polymer
57
2. 2. 2
Filler
57
2.2.3
Composite stabiliser/lubricant
57
system
2.3
LUBRICANT/MODIFIER STUDY
58
2.4
DRY BLENDING
59
2.5
60
2.5. 1
Ash content
60
2.5.2
61
2.6
61
2. 6. 1
63
2.6.2
Processing of lubricant/modifier
65
compositions
2.7
SURFACE APPEARANCE
66
2.8
ADDITIVE DISPERSION
66
2.9
ASSESSMENT OF FUSION
67
2.9. 1
67
2.9.2
67
69
2. 10 MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
2.10.1 Tensile testing
69
71
PROCESSING RESUL TS
78
DRY BLENDING-
78
3.1.1
79
3. 1. 1. 1
79
3. 1. 1. 2
80
3. 1. 1.3
3.2
73
86
Mechanical energy:
3. 2. 2
Extrusion pressures:
3.2.3
Extrusion results:
-vii-
82
Filler content
Filler content
Additive study
86
89
89
3. 3
3. 4
CHAPTER 4
4. 1
EXTRUDATE APPEARANCE
95
3.3.1
95
3.3.2
Appearance:
96
Inner surface
98
99
99
101
4. 1. 1
'B'
4.1.2
103
4. 1. 3
105
4.2
110
4. 3
111
4.4
4. 3. 1
111
4.3.2
121
4.3.3
122
CHAPTER 5
129
4. 4. 1
4.4.2
4.4.3
129
series
136
136
137
5. 1
137
5. 2
143
5.3
144
5.3.1
Impact properties:
Influence of
test temperature
153,/
155/'
DISCUSSION OF RESUL TS
157
6. 1
INTRODUCTION
157
6. 2
157
5. 4
CHAPTER 6
6.2. 1
6.2.2
157
160
160
169
of fusion
-v11i-
172 ,/
6.2.3
6.3
Mechanical properties
181
181
185 ,/
192
192
192
193
196
6.4-
Mechanical properties
204-
204-
6. 3. 2. 2 Impact properties
205/'"
RIGID PVC
CHAPTER 7
200
7. 1
CONCLUSIONS
214-
7.2
222
REFERENCES
224-
APPENDICES
236
-i)(/"\.
CHAPTER ONE
LITERA71JRE REVIEW
1. 1 INTRODUCTION
1. 1. 1 POLY <VINYL CHLORIDE)
Poly<vinyl
thermoplastic
<PVC)
chloride)
which
has
been
is
large
commercially
tonnage
available
since
extent
overcome
the
inherent
processing problems
of
PVC.
its
range
of
material
properties
and
applications
which
consumpt ion
of
PVC
has
dramat ically
increased
since the war with the notable exceptions of the oil crisis
in 1974 and the discovery that VCM is a major health hazard.
The current importance of PVC can be shown in the table 1.1
depicting the UK consumption of plastics.
The major application areas for PVC are vast and can
be
highlighted
considering
by
the
breakdown
of
PVC
its
commodity
and
1.2
plastic
illustrate
with
that
wide
PVC is
number
of
large
product
conversion
include
1. 1
costs
UPVC
pipe,
material
(3).
UPVC
The
cost,
future
windows,
versatility
expected
biaxially
and
growth
blown
low
areas
bottles,
Page
Introduction/l
TABLE 1. 1
UK consumption of plastics
[ll
(' OOOt)
Low density PEtLLDPE
High density PE
Polypropylene
PVC
Polystyrene
Expandable POlystyrene
Polyamides
ABS copolymer
Acetals
PET/PBT
Acrylics
Polyester film
Phenolic resins
Amino resins
Polyester resins
Epoxides
Urethanes
Others
1985
580
250
330
450
148
30
22
55
11
41
28
24
50
125
51
18
94
295
1986
610
275
370
484
156
33
23
58
12
45
29
24
49
131
53
19
100
265
TOTAL
2602
2736
TABLE 1. 2
PVC Market in Western Europe
MARKET
1986
(' OOOt)
Total
Rigid PVC
Bottles
Film and Sheet
Injection moulding
Pipe and Conduit
Profile Extrusion
Records
Miscell aneous
TOTAL RIGID
342
436
81
990
536
77
93
2555
83
105
20
239
129
1 9
22
617
Plasticised PVC
Coated Fabrics
Film and Sheet
Flooring
Tubing and profiles
Wire and Cable
Miscellaneous
TOTAL PLASTICISED
161
338
210
167
394
162
1432
40
95
39
346
Other applications
TOTAL CONSUMPTION
153
4140
37
1000
39
82
5 1
Page
Introduction/1
1. 1. 3 MANUFACTURE OF PVC
1.1.3.1 VINYL CHLORIDE MONOMER PRODUCTION
The
(VCM)
does
modern
not
productton
depend
upon
of
vinyl
acetylene
chloride
as
raw
monomer
material,
The
traditional
conversion
ethene
process
Ferric Chloride
------30:50~C------~
CH 2 =CH 2 + Cl,
Ethene
+ Chlorine
CH,Cl-CH 2 Cl
Ethylene dichloride
Stage Two:
CH,Cl-CH 2 Cl
Ethylene dichloride
VCM
Hydrogen
chloride
stored
as
liquid
under
VCM
(8. Pt
Water
pressure
without
polymerisation inhibitor.
1.1.3.2 TOXICITY OF VCM
VCM was not
although
hazards
appreciated,
operators
until
originally considered a
of
fir.e,
the
contracted
explosion
mid
various
1960' s
and
when
diseases
health hazard,
narcosis
some
PVC
including
were
plant
acro-
Page
Introduction/1
osteolysis,
Further
the
The indications of
this work [7) and many others suggested that VCM was a human
carcinogen
confirmed
and
with
these
the
preliminary
discovery
of
investigations
number
of
operat ion
were
and
introduced
approximately
ppm.
removal
in
residual
in
ppm
EEC
plant
These improvements
VCM levels
million)
directive has
where
plant design,
VCM.
(parts per
cases
300
The present
of
changes
were
to less
stipulated a
from
than
technical
Suspension
Bulk or Mass
Emulsion
Solution
world
nameplate
capacity
[8),
approximately 80%
while
solution
Suspension
characterised
by
diame'ter),
high
and
mass
their
coarse
bulk
density
polymers
particle
and
are
size
good
generally
(100-150
free
flm
flowing
The typical
product
applications for
the grades of
Page
Introduction/1
TABLE 1.3
pvc
rtgo-
processV19
K - values
I 5 I 8
150-
calendering
floor covering
PlC
pJasJlCIZed -
I 8
-valves
fss 7O
70
50-80 SO 10
10 ~7-58 15 7-68
pressure ppes
profiles
60
50 57-SO 60
ex !rusion of plo -
sticized - PVC
general
coblerroferia's
mainly
blON rroukisng
injectIOn m:.ukJmg
pr')cesslf):} 01
pastes
10-8:. 708]
1. 1. 4 CLASSIFICATION OF PVC
The
requirements
of
PVC
depend
upon the
exact ing
can
weight
be
assessed
cyclohexanone
at
25"C>
value>,
bearing
high
upon
level
of
the
related
to
processability
mechanical
table,
table
value
'K'
and
physical
value>
1. 3,
solution
or
via
<low' K'
demonstrated
that
performance
value>,
low
'K'
<high
'K'
The previous
values
were
Page
Introduction/!
injection
moulding
applications,
while
in
such as pastes,
heavily
a high' K'
plasticised
value is advisable
molecular
by
gel
weight
permeation
distribution
chromatography
of
PVC
(OPC)
can
to
be
yield
PVC
polymer
measured
to
may
be
ensure
sieved
that
and
no
the
large
percentage
grains
are
microscopy etc.
particle
density
is
measure
of
the
weight
per
unit
and
of
PVC.
A high
bulk
ability
plasticiser
particular
is
importaht
grade
in
of
PVC
assessing
grains
may
be
examined
by
techniques
to
the
absorb
dry
blend
The porosity of
such
as
light
ability
of
PVC
powder
to
flow
through
Page
Introduction/l
Electrical Conductivity
The electrical properties of PVC can be considerably
reduced
by
thus
measure
impurities
of
such as surfactant
electrical
residues etc
conductivity can be
used
and
to
heat
PVC
loss,
in
heat
st abili t y,
milled
sheet),
fish-eyes'
transparency
cont ent
and,
of
processing studies.
/PVC,
a
~un-l-i-ke-i-t.s-ma-i-n-compet.iJ_or:s,_
is unique in that
processing
stability
of
the
polymer.
Thus
PVC
inherent
technology
processing,
extend
material
reduce
[1~)
Stabilisers
Fillers
Plasticisers
Pigments
Impact modifiers
Lubricants
Extenders
Miscellaneous
fire
properties,
additives
ret ardant s,
stabilisers,
include
antistatic
brighteners,
Blowing
agents,
agents,
dyes,
fungicides,
light
decomposition
under
these
condi t ions,
then
Page
the
to
gaseous
polyene
formation,
byproducts,
processing,
performance
streaks
dramatic
and
acidic
of
gas
degraded
reduction
attack
of
(HCl),
in
voids
due
material
to
during
mechanical/electrical
corrosive
gas
upon
processing
of
stabilisation
have
not
be
universally
agreed,
ii)
v)
of
these
requirements
but
it
is
unlikely
that
may
be
categorised
into
three
main
a
PVC
classes
[12,16):
Primary Heat Stabilisers
Lead salts,
Organic compounds,
Cadmium compounds,tin
c~mpounds,
organophosphites etc.
Page
Introduction/1
Primary
stabilisers
can
be
combined
with
the
less
powerful.
salts
have
compounds
are:
applications).
cont ent
dual
toxic
ot herwise
as
lubricant.
(rest rict i ve
stainin~
sulphur
lead
low cost
purpose
In this project
voiding
However
restricted
may
occur
in
by a
and
lead
cert ain
safe lead
lastly
PVC
1.2.3.1 INTRODUCTION
/Lubricants
are
primarily
these
formulation
overfused.
have
of
possess
poor
lubricants
materials
lead
poor
aesthet ic
is
to
finish.
is
not
Unfortunately the
understood and
which are
propert ies
appearance.
The
complicated
to
well
products
physical
further
commercial range.
that
can
in PVC compounds
greater output.
interaction
poor
used
and
under
possibly
incorporat ion
by
the
or
of
available
EXTERiaL
These materials provide a lubricating layer between
,
polymer
efficiency
melt
in
and
this
hot
metal
manner
surface.
depends
upon
their
lubricating
low compatibility
Page
Introduction/l
especially
film.
in
at
operat ing
condi t ions
and
properties,
poor
fusion,
st rong
boundary
possible
reduction
in
finish.~
INTERNAL
These
addi t i ves
are
fundamentallY; different
to
the
internal
temperature.
friction
of
the
melt
at
the
processing
lubricants are
upon
fusion
rates
or
are
mild
fusion
promoters/
1.2.3.3 CLASSIFICATION OF LUBRICANTS
The
lubricants
varied,
commercial
is
vast
and
range
their
of
additives
chemical
classed
formulation
as
equally
paraffin and
hydrocarbon waxes.
b) Straight chain carbon molecules with polar end
groups:
the
metal stearates.
chemical
nature
of
to generalise.
common
lubricants
Pase
10
Introduction/1
test [18,26].
lubricant
with
measurable
property
such
as
torque
lubricant
Marshall
and
propert y,
haze,
PVC,
poor
and
its
Jacobsen
haze
chemical
[26,18]
structure.
For
example
identified
the
optical
Hartitz
rheometer as a
any
at
group
Brabender m
the
torque
into two
groups;
time
considered
concentration
lubricants
of
('internal')
significantly
while
delayed
the
second
fusion
time
and
[19]
No~l
differential
conducted
scanning
calorimetry
fundamental
to
detect
study
slight
lubricant
and
compatibility
effectiveness
as
an
internal
lubricant.
A simplified overview of the publications concerning
single
straight
component
chain
lubricated
carbon
processing behaviour.
compositions
lubricants
are
mainly
suggest
that
external
in
with
Page
11
Introduction/1
lubricants.
internal
Formulation
studies
using
the
of
number
well
of
stearate
known commercial
workers
behaves
processing
as
studies
stearate as a
[24,30]
an
lubricants,
have
suggested
external
[17,22,25,37]
for
that
lubricant,
have
example a
calcium
while
categorised
other
calcium
as an internal lubricant.
The
understanding
complicated
since
combinations
of
of
UPVC
many
differing
these
additives
composi t ions
lubricants;
in general,
the
is
further
incorporat e
composition
of
interaction
of
various
lubricant
combinations
and a number of
combinations.
combination
of
Rabinovitch
calcium
stearate
[27]
with
assessed
paraffin
wax
the
and
surface
finish
and extruder
power requirements.
An 'ideal'
the
hot
metal
surface,
with
interlayer within
Thus
the
the
of
[23]
an
blended a
external
number
nature
and
of
met al soaps wi th
noted
a synergistic
et
a1
(38)
propounded a
certain combinations of
delay
in
fusion
behaviour
for
Page
12
Introduction/1
1. 2. 4 FILLERS
at
some period of
time,
with
ORGANIC
INORGANIC
'"
Fibrous
'\
Fibrous
Particulate
Particulate
Asbestos
Calcium carbonate
Glass Fibre
Clays
Calcined clays
Talcs
Silicates
Silica
Al though
commercial
the
filler
range
is
of
fillers
predominantly
obtained by natural
or synthetic
is incorporated
most
in
opaque
vast,
calcium
routes.
UPVC
is
the
main
carbonate
Calcium carbonate
formulations
and
far
for
example
the
West ern
Europe
consumpt ion
of
large
extent
upon
the
intended
application,
however,
Page
13
Introduction/l
i)
ii)
v)
vi)
vii) Non-flammable
viii)Absence of odour and good colour
ix)
x)
xi)
type,
but generally a
characteristic
of
direct
bearing
upon
selection
criteria
and
can
be
calcium
to
its
low
carbonate
filler
used
was
abundance,
non-toxicity
Page
and
14
Introduction/1
versatility
technical
terms
in
advantages
of
particle
have
been
criteria.
proposed
for
number
the
of
prudent
non irritating,
odourless
~3)
to
carbonate
produce:
processed
coarse
can
be
puri fied
calcium
obtained
ground
via three
main
carbonate
and
precipitated
Dry
processed
used
since
coarse
the
calcium
dry
particle
carbonate
grinding
size
of
grades
nat ural
distribution
and
are
not
minerals
inherent
Page
15
Introduction/1
calcium carbonate
fillers
of
propert ies
synthetically
upon
by
PVC.
can
produce
recarbonation
grades
process
are
which
The
mean
particle
size
can
be
of
very
low
~m.
1-10
approximately
~m.
coating
although
other
coatings
can
mixers.
be
are
stearic
coatings
applied
acid
have
by
and
been
dry
calcium
tried
blending
stearate,
[48-49J.
in
high
The
speed
of PVC matrix
calcium carbonate
filled
systems,
especially at
levels
Page
16
Introduction/I
greater than 20% and the vast commercial range adds to the
ambiguity
of
highlight
the
the
situation.
The
importance
of
studies
have
dispersion
tended
and
to
particle
size/distribution.
The
'top cut'
of
filler
grade,
10% of
effect
upon
surface
properties
appearance,
processing
calcium
resistance
[46, 51l.
carbonate
such as notched
tear
equipment
can
impact
and
machine
Similarly
produce
coarser
can
occurs
act
as
zones
whereby
Alternatively,
[50, 52J.
wear
on
grades
of
substantially
resistance,
(in excess of
concentration
fine
inferior
of
particle size
10
stresses
calcium
The
filler
fine
grades
surface
of
areas
calcium
and
thus
carbonate
many
provide
bonding
large
sites
for
dispersion;
poorly
dispersed
filler
is.
similar
in
of
prepared a
(mean
loadings,
the
10 and 20%.
production
sizes:
sheets
respective samples
between
impact,
Impact
clearly
and
2'4
~m)
at
two
of
properties.
0'07
by
extrusion
'houses'
performance,
demonstrated
for
drop
that. the
and
a
testing
the
large number
ball
fine
and
of
tensile
particle
size
and
coarse
filled
extrudates.
These
results
were
The
micrographs
illustrated
the
gross
Page
17
Introduction/!
agglomeration of
the
finer
and this
the
poor
produced
impact
samples
of
behaviour.
The
the
formulations
same
second
of
the
by
of
work
two
roll
stage
~m.
samples
were
significantly
by
the
coating
which
surrounding
lubricant
the
is
considered
filler
to
act
particles
as
to
prevent
tear,
fatigue
whi le
physical
properties such as
criteria
are
including
toughness
(K t e
weathering
and
>,
generally
tensile
lowered,
creep
behaviour,
(tensile,
moduli
shrinkage
tensile,
are
fracture
flexural>,
Young's,
enhanced.
Impact
behaviour
dispersion,
grade,
coating and
of
of
PVC
usage
is
not
demands
considered
more resilient
the
general
products.
Outdoor
temperatures.~~e
critically
and/or
brittle,
dependant
processing
provide a
slight
conditions.
The
changes
use
of
in
formulation
modifiers
c-/
can
respond
Page
18
Introductionll
based
argued
upon
whether
rubbery-type
certain
calcium carbonate,
in a
materials,
fillers,
such
although
as
fine
should be considered as
separate class.
it
can
be
precipitated
impact modifiers
EVA
and
C?E,
grafted
to
PVC
blended or,
by
adding
in the case
the
preformed
The level
and
applications
due
ABS
to
are'
poor
not
recommended
UV stability
for
associated
out door
with
the
All acrylic
type
has
traditionally
used
CPE
and
EVA
for
certain
applications.
This
modifiers,
project
namely a
investigated
CPE and
an all
two
different
acrylic
(ACR).
impact
A brief
table 1. 4 [57]:
Page
19
Introductionl1
Impact
Disadvantages
Modifier
1.
CPE
1.
Outdoor applications
processed
(esp in Europe)
2.
2.
better
3.
at low temperatures
than acrylics
4-.
5.
Higher specific
gravity than ACR
4.
1.
Outdoor applications
2.
Wide processing
1.
window
3.
and efficiency
ACRYLIC
Yellowing in
white products
ductility
3.
Can be over-
2.
Moderate low
Excellent colour,
temperature
impact efficiency
per f ormanc e
and retention
4-.
enhanced
strain
mechanisms;
rates
firstly
particles within a
modifier
forms
behaviour
can
the
be
of
modified
explained
modifier
is
by
PVC
under
two
dispersed as
very
distinct
d.iscrete
.'
phase
which
encapsulates
PVC
primary particles.
Page
20
Introduction/1
Acrv1ic modiFiers
The
modi fier
in
blend
wi t h
PVC
forms
discrete
an improvement in impact is
as
all-acrylic
system
is
based
upon
saturated
of
impact
dispersed
particles
improvement
i1>
is
related to:
particle-matrix
i)
evenly
adhesion
iii)
rubber
content
and
lastly vi)
modifier
level
(61).
The
by
processing
conditions,
since
the
crosslinked
(62).
CPE and EVA modifiers
comb'
network
is
embedded.
blend's
of
structure
formed
The
in
[63-68),
which
improvement
where
primary
in impact
irreversible deformation
PVC
an
elastomeric
particles
are
can be relat ed t o t he
behaviour.
Siegmann
et
a1
during
tensile
deformation
was
predominantly
failure.
However
CPE modified
systems
differed
from
they do
Page
21
Introduction/1
A number
importance
structure
impact
of
of
st udies
mechanicel
of
network
enhancement
is
[62, 65-68]
processing
systems.
The
observed
when
encapsulates
the
primary
temperatures
or
an
upon
the
optimum
a
particles.
increased
shear
honey-comb
condition
elastomeric
In
the
the
case
history
for
network
of
the
higher
primary
the
network,
resulting
in
the
formation
do
distribution
thus
not
inferior
to
for ,good
required
impact
original blend,
the
ideal
impact
size
particle
efficiency
when
performance,
discrete
[61]
and
to
the
compared
is observed.
Menges
PVC
conform
of
et 81 [67]
produced a
high
impact
grade of
and
dramat ic
sorption
dependence
strength;
at
techniques.
of
The
processing
temperature
of
188'C
performance
was
observed.
At
higher
performance
was
associated
produce
with
discrete
introduced,
the
destruction
particles
of
revealed
progressively
study
impact,
the
of
the
optimum
and
impact
this
network
the' modifier.
as shown in figure 1. 2,
impact
temperatures
reduced
the
system
A model
the
was
to
was
for
!'
StQ~t
or (.rCI'" --t~~~fr~~2j
formatIon Ot _
r
SIQrt 01
a:o:z:e
ro~mat'on
(Al)
E""t,"g erOles
.100
new
(Bl)
LimitatIon 01 crQzt
tor-fruition
crazes form
(A2)
(B2)
Page
22
Introduction/l
Case A:
small
crazes develop at
perpendicular
the
to
direction
of
applied
stress.
Craze
the craze
further
crazes
are
initiated
at
other
(A2)
convenient
boundary interfaces.
Case B:
The
situation
after
phase
ie
t ransformat ion,
modifier
(B1>.
Further
deformation
leads
to
craze
cri t ical
CPE
and
[62J
all
impact
acrylic
tested milled
modifiers
UPVC blends of
and
confirmed
the
particulate
studies
nature
including
of
Berens
PVC
and
was
highlighted
Folt
[69J
and
by
Hori
ranging
ramifications
properties.
upon
processing
and
subsequent
pr~cess
in a
as liquid
combination of
Page
23
Introduction/l
vigorous
agitation
colloid.
The
maint ained
and
batch
at
in
the
mixt ure
speci fic
presence
is
of
cont inually
polymerisat ion
agi t at ed
t emperat ure
resultant
then
slurry
finally
temperature
variables
coarse
[71 J.
particles
, stripped'
is
and
rate
level
in
residual
to
screened
The
involved
of
of
colloid
the
control
large
polymerisation
protection are
of
<"'50-
dried and
extraneous
remove
and
whereby the
VCM,
agitation,
of
protective
the
main
molecular weight
and
conversion
steps
process
[71-73]
and
proceeds
an
by
schematic
series
of
representation
FIGURE 1. 3
CONVERSION
Formed
Finally
100 -200"
.. 50
Micro- Domain
@:
~ 10'
'Prim~":;,eusl
GROWTH
SIZE
When-
ONInATrON
UNTRA-PRIMARY}
0,,- 0-2)Jfn
...
Prima'YO
G-e-O8)A"'1
Particle
15ea1e
4lOt
~._t.~
~
UNTER PRIMARY)
!i
1-2F
Scale
~<"'
Page
24
Introductionll
The polymerisation
reaction
occurs.
the
temperature
Also
and
decomposition
of
the
initiator
polymerising
droplet
occurs
at
very
low
rate
of
conversion [71]
of
chloride)
poly<vinyl
protective
droplets
colloid.
on
to
Coalescence
the
of
poly<vinyl
a
number
acetate)
of
conversion levels of
monomer
5-15% to
VCM,
agglomerat ion
maximum)
namely
short
form
the
coagulate
primary
remain
and
to
nuclei
and
until
become
aggregate
of
species;
first
are
growth
<"1000
to
grow
and
step,
stable
only
stage,
microdomains
to
3-10%
flocculate
agglomerates.
<"50
aggregation
for
domains or
microdomains).
approximately
unstable
polymer chains
identified species:
continue
at
of
the
brief
stable
domains
number
Microdomains
after
part icle
particles
product
microdomains.
time
of
The
domains
produce
primary
conversion
to
form
Agglomerates
the
the
third
increase
in
final
attributed to
high
~m.
irregular
appearance
of
conversion
rat es
leading
to
PVC
grains
is
grain pressure at
part ial
collapse
of
the
grain.
1.3.2 PVC NOMENCLATURE
The particulate nature of PVC has been identified or
observed by a large number of workers [71-82],
[82]
summarised
Symposium
<Lyon
discussion
Villeurbanne,
held
1976)
at
upon
nomenclature,
origin
of
an
the
Table
species
however Geil
International
preferential
1.5 lists the
and approximate
Page
25
Introduction/1
size range.
the
Allsopp [72]
proposed
previously.
TABLE 1. 5
PVC NOMENCLATURE
Term
Grain
Agglomerate
At-wage
(/Jm)
(pm)
50-250
130
10-150
40
2-10
Primary
particle
0-6-0-8
Domain
0+0-2
Micro-doffitlin
(wilh r(1ert'ncn)
Granule 1
Cellular grain J
Sub.granule 2
UnicelP
Aggregale 2
Cluster)
Macroglobule 4
0-7
Microgranule
Primary particle l
Granule l
Micro-globule 4
Primary particle nucleus. Contains about 10] microdomains. Only observed at low conversion (less
than 2 'YJ or after mechanical working. Term only
used to describe 01 pm species; becomes primary
particle as soon as growth starts.
Primary nucleus 2
Granule l
Basic particle l
Particle]
0-2
(200nm)
(2000 A)
0-01-0-02
previous lamin%gy
Origin ur dC'saiptiull
Approximate si=e
Range
~0-02
(20nm)
(200 A)
NOles
I. The domain is not a feature of PVC morphology in high conversion polymer samples since a growth of this species with conversion obliterates
all memory of it. It may only be 'regenerated' and observed after subsequent processing.
2. As soon as formation of the domain is complete and growth is registered it is preferable to call it a primary particle. Therefore. the term domain
is often ignored in favour of primary particle even at the point of morphogenesis of the 02 pm primaries at low conversion.
3. The reason for a separate identity for the domain is that it may be shown in future to contain an atypical morphological or molecular feature,
e.g. higher level of crystallinity.
.
The application
of
standard
terms
to describe
the
has
lead to an overall
universal
approach to
the
idealised model
which
understanding of PVC
particulate structure.
1.3.3 MOLECULAR STRUCTURE OF PVC
The previous section considered the particulate
nature of PVC and a general idealistic model of PVC grain
morphology can be presented <figure 1.4).
Page
26
Introduction/1
FIGURE 1. 4-
'O}lm
PRIMARY PARTICLE
-.......
........ ySUB-GRAIN SOl""
200 A
MICRO DOMAIN
AGGLOMERATE
"""
51""
"---~A-"-..A
2000 ;.
O'2pm DOMAIN
(PRIMARY PARTICLE
at 2'- conversion)
PRIMARY PARTICLE
l ... m (1000 nml
" MICROOOMAINS
200 A {lO nm)
X is a
PVC.
of
substituent
consequence
that
is
group
large
degree
if
polymerisat ion,
favoured
Figure
then
1.5
upon
a
energetic
particular
stereoregular
depicts
the
considerations
substituent
polymer
three
will
tactic
during
placement
be
is
produced.
placements
of
the
while
the
first
tactic
with
[60, 84.-85J.
by
the
placements
techniques
a
are
regular,
Commercial
irregular.
generally
syndiotactic
value
favour
of
syndiotactic
approximately
55%
use
of
effective
polymerisation temperatures.
dependant
is
placement
polymerisation
polymers
two
upon
tacticity,
chain
transfer
agents
or
low
of
branching
and
other
Page
27
Introduction! 1
unsaturation,
Cl
-CH2-CH-CH2-CH-CH2-CH-CH2-CH-CH2I
Cl
Cl
Syndiotactic (rrr)
-CH2-CH-CH2-CH-CH2-CH-CH2-CH-CH2I
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Isotactic
(mInm)
Cl
Cl
I
-CH2-CH-CH2-CH-CH2-CH-CH2-CH-CH2I
Cl
Cl
Heterotactic (rmr)
1.3.3.1 PVC CRYSTALLINITY
range
of
diffraction
density,
(WAXS/SAXS),
infra-red
scat t ering
that
(SANS).
crystallinity
syndiot act ic
of
and
The
is
sequences
syndiotacticity
[60,88].
techniques
small
implicat ions
related
to
of
the
produces
thermal
more
angle
analysis,
neutron
these st udies
presence
and
X-ray
of
are
short
increasing levels
crystalline
pOlymer
cryst alline
nucleus
surrounded
by
const rained
amorphous
material [89-90].
Page
28
Introduction/l
The
Natta
and
crystalline
Corradini
nucleus
(91l,
cell,
the
like
5 1
planar
crystals
grow
structures
may
lamellae.
Summers
structure
<figure
together
by
tie
syndiotactic.
in
a
be
that
the
chains,
Wenig
(90)
lamella-like manner,
present
(92)
1.6)
investigated
the
unit
due
to
considered
in
molecules
which
the
<figure
1. 7)
two
5 4
per
unit
concluded
that
although
rod-
deformation
platelet
crystals
to
by
cell
were
first
who proposed
was
of
the
crystal
are
produce a
held
three
dimensional network.
FIGURE 1. 6
FIGURE 1. 7
Page
29
Introduction/l
The
level
polymerised
PVC
of
is
crystallinity
usually
reported
in
to
although Straff
[77,67,86-87,88,93-94];
be
et
commercially
between
81 [95]
5-10%
did not
obtain a SAXS peak for UPVC and thus stated that PVC is not
crystalline.
SAXS
peak
for
plast icised
UPVC
PVC.
but
were
These
able
examples
to
observe a
highlight
peak
the
for
inherent
PVC.
Ballard et
di-n-octylphthalate).
is
A recent st udy ,
more
of
WAXS
81 [97],
(10% deutoero-
sensitive
crystallinity
e. g.
technique
PVC
is
than
WAXS/SAXS,
ii)
the
and
iii)
the
apprOXimately
15%
that
development
chain
is
considerable
annealing
of a
or
evidence
drawing
of
[84,98-100]
PVC
results
in
to
the
(nematic mesomorphic
phase).
One of
the observations
The fusion
and,
no
doubt,
research.
PVC
is
however
attained.
to
continue
to
be
the
source of
critically
dependent
further
the 'quality'
upon
the
level
of
of
easily
workers
fUSion
will
products
fusion,
many
It
of
have
the
attempted
observed
to
relate
particulate
the
nature
development
of
PVC.
of
The
rheometry,
capillary rheometry,
differential
thermal
Page
30
Introduction! 1
1. 4. 1 FUSION MECHANISMS
Sieglaff
[771
and
separate publications
Krzewki
and
proposed that
Collins
fusion
[811
of PVC
in
could be
PVC
grains
are
broken
down
into
sub-micron
These structures
Breakdown of
micro-particles
The
The
grains
st ruct ures,
fusion
do
t he
not
rupture
grains
occurs.
Again
are
to
yield
compact ed
these
units
sub-grain
and
int ernal
interdiffuse
to
the
of
general
rout es
observed
[67,75,79, 1011,
by
however
mechanisms.
number
experimental
for
Sieglaff
for
large
account
of
workers
evidence and
specific
better
[771
maj ori t y
understanding of
also
postulated
that
the
in
st ruct ure
were
the
early st udy
methyl
of
between
ultramicrotomed
170C)
while
micron
microscope.
the
at
inner
mat erial.
processing
a1
The
observed
At
processing
low
[731
observed
the
range
section
of
via
specimens
160-210C
a
seems
<160-
unaffected,
approximately
and
transmission
temperatures
structure
temperatures of
<"'1
et
specimens
particulate
extrudate
particles
Hat t ori
ext rudate
methacrylat e
obtained
electron
by
180'C the
temperature
to
0190'C)
leads
breakdown
of
this
network
Page
31
lntroductionll
and
the
Network
inclusion
of
fine
disintegration
threads
described
roll
milling.
by Vidyikina
A
fibrils
is complete at
or
higher
A).
300
and no further
B1
et
200'C
(ca.
during a
in an
study of
increase
t he
same
st udy,
Hat t ori
application
of
temperatures
heat
3
<ie.
alone
but
minutes
B1
et
the
high
In
was
was
also
observed
still
possible
only
220C).
induced
Thus
at
they
to processing temperature.
Faulkner
postulate
various
[103J,
[80J
applied
particle
features
figure
of
1. 8,
Brabender
breakdown
a
were
plasticorder~
mechanism
typical
for
PVC,
temperature-torque
associated
with
specific
to
the
trace
particle
transitions.
FIGURE 1. 8
30
20
I!
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
Temperoture 'C
Page
32
Introduction/1
samples
at
assessing
the
transmission
following
figure
intervals
particle
inferences
peak
to
(a)
the
hierarchy
microscopy.
electron
1. 8;
throughout
the
was
rheometer
trace
scanning
and
attributed
the
via
He
characteristic
reported
to
peaks
shown
contain a
in
compacted
micrographs
material
reveal
deformed
fibrillated
<c)
and
t he
primary
mat erial
has
undergone
particles
are
not
structure might
be
present.
processing history
determining
[104]
its
Brabender
the
molecular
deformat ion
although
author
suggested
trace.
previous
study,
and
Also
the
by re-
Rabinovitch
rheometer
however
domain
that
temperature-torque
conditions
evident,
temperature-torque
conducted
confirmed
of
The
which
the
study
and
effect
of
upon
the
polymer .characteristics
overview
of
fusion
publications [80,105-106]
he
two
inferred
that
components.
the
based
upon
various
fusion
Firstly
progressive breakdown of
supra-mole'cular component,
particulate
st,ructur~
into
where
occurs
from
I's
primary
fe~
<Stage
Ill,
particles
11
and
and
particles
domains
refer
that
even
in
the
to grains,
surviving
predominantly
here it is
particle
flow,
layer
of
the
particles
[105].
Thus
degree
of
boundaries
invokes
chain
boundaries and
increases
mobility
to
level
fusion.
As
the
mel t
and
increases,
permit
of
while
molecular
the
effect
di ffusion
of
across
Page
33
'
Introduction/!
particle
breakdown
and
processing
temperature
then
the
the
(upto a
is obtained.
degree
Thus
the
of
fusion
breakdown
particle
of
level
depends
with
coupled
Benjamin (108)
1. 6,
flow
units.
170C)
A low
yields
interaction,
the
processing
primary
particle
particles
as shown in figure
temperature
flow
with
(typically
poor
160-
particulate
together
by
the
crystallites
particles
is
structure
is
melt
increased
not
thus
<figure
completely
recrystallisation takes
together
and
interaction
1. 10).
destroyed
The
and
between
the
particulate
upon
some of
cooling
particles
(figure 1. 11>.
These
Page
34
Introduction/l
Summers
the two
low
activation
t emperat ure
energy
f low behaviour
value
when
is
the
due
primary
to
low
melt
part icles
are
FIGURE 1. 11
Page
35
Introduction/l
Lastly
Allsopp
[112J
conducted
was
extrusion
not
and
the
normal
an
extensive
study
processing equipment
He revealed that
mechanism
in
for
previous
publ1cat ions
studies
generally
accounted
the
grain
case
of
by
\I
suggesting
that
PVC
and
laboratory
involved
sample
Banbury~
Thus
two
'I
'CDFE'
mechanisffij
compacted,
appreciable
due
to a
densified,
shear
forces
are
high directional
fused
and
present,
and
shear stress
before
finally
the grains
@j:I@
~-
KEY:
res-.
~ "'""'os
Porosity
)(
'CDFE'
MECHANISM
~o
0
"
0~~()od
C? .... c::::>
1]"" G
D
~
0 ' .p
t
{{p.
Qj,.
I
1aoVm GRAINS
COMMINUTION
MECHANISM
Denotes
Additives
---+
o' ID
I
...
FINAL MELT
.. ...
+--
1oF
DIRECTION
SHEAR
Page
36
Introduction/l
This
number
of
laboratory
proposal
has
workers
[ 113-116].
and
received
processing
recent
support
Allsopp
ranked
equipment
in
an
from
common
attempt
to
,
I
,I , n
>
~
x
>
~
~
~
~
0
c
--
I ~,
x
w
"0'
,;I
~I
0'
El
a
z
.,
~'
\ "in
Z
si
OENSIFtCATION 100%
COMMINUTION
Gilbert
c
"
1 ~l
~i
< i
w,
w
c
100"-
"z
2z
"c Z~
51
I,~I~i
>
~,
u'
~I
w
I~I
i
I
.1
et
a1
[114]
confirmed
CDFE
route
for
primary
crystalline
melting
mechanism
which
on
It
and
is
subsequent
evident
fusion
in order
relate
fusion
assessment
is
that
the
complex particle
mechanism
are
processing equipment
to evaluate these
levels
required.
to
critically
hierarchy
dependant
properties
There are
method
number
of
fusion
of established
'
Page
37
Introduction/l
the
literature
this
[107,114, 117l,
section to discuss,
is
it
therefore intended
in detail,
in
of
particles,
much
and
the
units.
The
publications
of
possible
possible
breakdown
previous
which
have
electron
microscopes
fusion
mechanisms
However as a
section,
used
to
the
is
sample
which
cited
resolution
conclusions
upon
not
easily
preparation
is
primary
1. 4. I,
high
yield
into
smaller
various
power
PVC
deemed
obtained,
is
careful
essential,
and
small
to be representative
of
reproducible
area
is
viewed
the speCimen,
and
therefore
common
to
use
these
microscopes
to
It
confirm
levels,
contrast
(DIC)
[114, 119l;
for
and
these
example,
use
of
techniques
differential
Jamin-Lebedeff
can
detect
interference
interferometer
refractive
index
Solvent attack
methylene
chloride)
depends
upon
molecular
network;
areas where a
poorly
the
fused
(e. g.
extent
of
specimen
acetone or
a
will
cohesive
contain
The swelling of
Page
38
Introduction/l
these
particles
could
lead
to
partial
as
network
of
disintegration
and
high
integrity
and
thus
few
attack.
tests,
but
discrimination
been
Solvent
of
introduced
for
this
fused
International standards
type
of
test
(120-1211.
PVC
(113,116,1221
although
the
application
of
this
et
the
destroyed
amorphous
and
thus
shearing of
swollen
microscopy,
could
acetone at
phase,
the
continue
acetone
to
crystal lites
act
samples,
differentiate
are
not
crosslinks.
The
as
viewed
by
optical
between
levels
of
fusion.
This solvent
network
linked
test
used
to
temperature-programmable
assess
Faulkner (801
the
processing history
from
processed
a
dry
illustrates
rheometer
of
PVC
can
be
compound,
torque/temperature curve
the
torque
<figure 1.8)
composition
blend
the
of
the
with
that
same
relationship
for a
ground crumb of
of
reference
composition.
between
well
Figure
and
curve
1. 14
poorly
Page
39
Introduction/l
FI GURE 1. 14-
60
EX TRUDATE
40
E
z
.30
~
20
10
100
120
140
160
180
Temperature C
200
220
240
1. 4. 2. 4 CAPILLARY RHEOMETRY
Gonze [103] and Lamberty [123) published a method of
determining
the
level
composition.
The
rheological
pressure
loss
in
of
short
130-150'C) .
(typically
[81,108,124-126]
can
of
fusion
method
measures
capillary
The
provide
at
widely
a
the
low
particulate
the
corresponding
changes
material;
melt
b)
network interaction;
indicative
of
me1t
structure
in
the
elasticity
technique
reported
measurable
can
be
elastic
fusion
a)
value
changes
assessed
behaviour
increases
elastic
temperatures
PVC
processed
with
of
by
the
increasing
The
technique measures
the
through a short
6P is defined as:
4L
6P = or (2n + S .. ) + or _
(1. 1)
Where
6P
or
n
S ..
L
Extrusion pressure
Shear stress at capillary wall
Viscous loss term
Recoverable ~hear strain
Capillary length
Capillary diameter
Page
40
Introduction/l
The
first
term of
the above
1. e.
equation accounts
6P can be rewritten;
6P ENT + 6P vxsc
Where
for
(1. 2)
used
(' Zero-length'
term,
loss
capillary)
The
predominates.
can
components.
be
further
Han [127]
then
divided
the
total
into
entrance
pressure
entrance
pressure
viscous
and
elastic
ent rance
pressure
losses
are
measure
of
mel t
elasticity.
plot
of
capillary
pressure
versus
processing
FIGURE 1. 15
140
150
160
170
Stoc;" TemperatureC
180
190
200
Page
41
Introduction/l
breakdown,
molecular
followed
network
by
format ion.
the
The
gradual
product ion
increase
of
in
st andard
.-
Gelation level
The
the
main
t est
PSAMPLE
P MAX
provides
limitation
reference
seems
for
curve
PM'IN
x 100
<1.3)
P"'IN
quantifiable
result,
to
production
every
be
the
and
composition
al though
of
processing
technique.
1.4.2.5 THERMAL ANALYSIS
Thermal
scanning
thermal
analysis
calorimet ry,
t ransi t ions
techniques,
can
such
provide
as:
analysis
of
PVC
has
useful
and
been shown to
differential
information
upon
transition temperature
glass
(TG),
i. e.
so
forth.
produce
The
thermal
more
complex
material [69,94,128-129].
accounted
endothermal
1. 16 depicts
(value
peaks
and
processing
history.
Figure
quoted
on
right-hand
side
of
trace)
upon
DSC
hist ory
melting
about
show a
endotherm
155
processed
to
then
TG
for
195"C.
TG
of
primary
crystallinity
If
dry
remains
the
blend
unchanged,
is
broad
ranging
from
subsequently
however
the
broad
as
shown
t emperat ure
in
the
endotherm
above
' B'
figure.
represents
The
sharper
the
&
higher
mel t ing
of
An
Introduction/1
FIGURE 1. 16
DSC thermograms of processed PVC
Moulding
iemperc1U"'eS
,60-C
,70C
0
x
w
1
I,
~
160C
0
0
192"C
2OOC
2,OC
220C
200
050
'00
(Temperature C)
lower
temperature crystallites.
at
higher
to
temperature
produces a
higher
exceeds
appears,
peak
attributed
crystallites
against
produced
capillary
second
increase
observed
If
the
processing
endotherm
peak,
processing
in
A',
temperature
the
If
endotherm,
temperature.
"'160C
further
110C to
order.
t h e ' B'
processing temperatures,
shifting
is
Thus
onset
to
the
to
energy
'B'
the
produce
processing
which
of
of
recrystallisation
secondary
this
temperature,
resembles
endotherm.
rheometry studies.
This endothermic
of
the
crystallites
endotherm
reference
'S'
of
(6H A >
is
shaped
primary
plotted
curve
curve obtained
Therefore Gilbert
et
lower
al
is
from
[128]
Page
43
Int roductionll
of processed PVC.
the'S'
onset
processing temperature
The above
technique
differentiates
between
equipment
that
the
and
may
types
The study
process
rheometry
of
fusion
and
via
thermal
analysis,
elect ron
transmission
capill ary
microscopy.
occurs
<166-174C)
as
at
lower
opposed
temperature
to
for
extrusion
roll
milling
<190-194C).
The
et
81
(130)
produced a
'master curve'
which
values.
The
master
curve
of
fusion
can
be
combined
and it
quoted
results
of
three
for
an
unknown
sample
[1311
of
The
used
fusion
thermal
within
technique was
analysis
single
to measure
and
particularly
provided
for
this
screw
twin
useful
the
complementary
evidence
avail abl e.
to
support
The
an
the assessment
small
test
of
specimen,
fusion
less
the suggested
dependence
advantages are:
upon
composition,
Page
44.
Introduction/l
'internal'
estimate
of
processing
problems
when
temperature
The small
representative
and
fusion
is
required
relationship
between
Physical
physical
properties: -
properties
and
the
The
level
of
1. 5. 3.
Physical
assessing fusion
test
specimens
may
is
be
testing
required
and
is
far
be reviewed in a
as
difficult
fusion
an
indirect
since a
the
test
from
later
method
of
large number
of
shape
may
not
be
flow
index
(MFI): -
KrUger
and
Menges
carried
fused
quantitative
measure
of
processing
can
easily be
appearance: -
An
Therefore a
increase
obtained
r 132].
in fusion
level
fracture'
appearance
'zero
r 107,124,133-134].
under
length'
extreme
die,
shear
can provide a
Therefore
the
conditions,
for
extrudate
example;
qualitative assessment
of
fusion.
Viscoelastic
r 134]
to
methods:-
Elongational
observe
response:
difficult
the
effect
however
to
the
interpret
of
fusion
techniques
so do
not
r 106]
level
are
lend
flow
rheology
upon
viscoelastic
sophisticated
themselves. to
and
quick
Page
45
Introduction/l
Powder
feedstock
is
commonly
prepared
via
high
speed
forces
until
impellor
inv'oke a
a
blend
to form a
significant
temperature
fluid
vortex.
increase
of
about
High
in charge temperature
120C
is reached,
of
high
speed
densification
mixing
of
PVC
shearing
include:
grains,
The possible
dispersion
grain
additives
when
of
comminution,
lead
to
number
[42,107,119,136-139].
of
as
flowing
dry
upon premix
behaviour,
blending
studies
of
addi t i ve
characteristics such
bulk
dispersion
densi t y,
and
free
processing
stability.
Miadonye
variables,
to
the
,[ 139]
correlated
premix
high
speed
mixer
It
was
UPVC;
principles.
and
twin
however
screw
the
extruders
ext ruders
are
operat e
both
via
used
to
di fferent
Page
46
Introduction/1
temperatures
efficiency
heating,
with
of
single
backflow
within
the
amount
screw
low shear,
residence
extrusion
time.
depends
screw
upon
mixing
Alternatively,
design.
mechanism
of
possible
and,
screw
ext ruder is a
mixing
minimum
the
The
shear
sections
twin
screw
depends
upon
rolling,
kneading
action
the
extrusion of
UPVC
dominat e
dry
t he market
blends,
in Europe
was
counter
used
in
this
proj ect
and
therefore
further
extruders
are
characteristics,
motion
by
the
designed
the
to
material
action
of
have
being forced
intermeshing
positive
(' C'
in
screws
a
to
shaped packets).
linearly
with
increasing
screw
the powder
to
rate
influence
138];
the
extrusion
of
while output
speed
[142-143],
feedstock
twin
are known
mel t ing
has
been
mechanism
reported
[112,131,141,145-146].
majority
heating
place,
(melting
molten
of
of
the
number
of
length
powder,
while
rapidly,
during
the
is
in
in
the
film
UPVC
screw
twin
publications
barrel
complete
of
over
the
last
several
produced
at
involves
melting
section
turns,
the
compact ion
process
of
the
possibly
barrel
wall
the
and
takes
screws
one).
which
Page
'A
is
47
Introduction! 1
tumbling action
produced.
heat
melt
pool
of
distorted shape
transfer,
Processing
upon
the
at
and due to a
conditions
are
reported
to
is
have
although
interface.
little
the
effect
position
of
are
few
reported
studies
which
attempt
to
measured
fusion
value,
and
the consequences
[108)
conditions
level
was
rheometer
method
reference
curve
and
The
and
that
resisted
attack
were affected.
const ant
while
the
series
by
four
a
of
gelation
'zero
results
by
milling
solvent
attack,
water
samples
the
pressure.
with
poorly
tensile,
high
fused
under
levels.
length'
pressure
roll
pipes
capillary
related
to
(32,44,68,90%
while
wide range
impact,
Solvent
levels
pipes
testing
of
(32
crack
fusion
and
44%)
maximum value
ductility
strain at break,
opt imum
the
hydrostatic
revealed
provide
prepared
tests including:
formation
to
determined
gelation levels).
of
extruded
val ue
at
tests,
higher
such
as
gelat ion
tensile
level
impact,
approximat ely
44-68%
of
68%,
tensile
produced an
gel at ion
level.
would
particular
confirmed
provide
the
pipe
and
his
pipe extrusion
8,1
[67)
also
earlier
best
composition
hypothesis
(figure 1. 17).
observed
balance
of
properties
chosen.
based
upon
Berndtsen [147)
maximum in
ultimate
for
The
the
results
experience
in
and Menges et
strain
at
an
Page
48
Introduction/1
FIGURE 1. 17
Stiffness
Ductile
brittle
behaviour
;;
>
o
Fusion
Marshall
gelat ion
levels
et
81
than
Level
[113J
produced
Benj amin
with
die
wider
set
range
of
t emperat ure
thermal analysis
(DTA)
capillary rheometry.
Solvent
quantitative method
studied
pressure
and
values
temperatures.
An
its
was
effect
negligible
instrumented
upon
pendulum
the
capillary
except
for
at
impact
rheometer
low
profile
tester
was
The impact
results
Page
49
Introduction/l
generally
support
ductility
at
strength
Benjamin's
mid
at
fusion
levels,
approximately
explanation for
1. e.
fusion
60%
this impact
of
short
maximum
in
hypothesis
level.
term
impact
possible
et
the
in
81
effect
upon
series
of
papers [109,148-149)
impact
performance by
plotting
peak
at
an
approximate melt
low output
temperature
rate,
of
190C
strength with a
peak
at
The
were
higher
assessed
temperature
for
4. 2. 2)
fusion
(aI95C).
level
by
the
extrudates
acetone
test
confirmed
steady
increasing
processing
and
the
progression
in
fusion
temperature.
(1.
micrographs
shearing
level
with
to
poor
surface
finish
'lubrication'
and
thus
failure,
poor
impact
retention.
this
phenomenon
melt
similarly,
of
melt
due
to
higher
melt
elasticity
and,
impact properties.
and
consequently
overall
decrease
in
the
and
not
then
yield
impact
a
tested.
maximum,
The
instead
monotonic
'S'
shaped
Therefore
the
presence
of
surface
stress
pipe
series.
extrusion
et
81
published
number
of
papers
The
pipe series
temperatures
ranging
was
extruded at
from
180-204C
10-7570
different
and
had
(measured by capillary
Page
50
Int roduction/ 1
rheometry).
A initial
study
[125]
illustrated
test
impact
tensile
impact,
produced
processing temperature
temperature
cited
region.
similar
modified grades
study [150]
until
The
(1.
monotonic
2.5.2:
conclusion
to
the
at
of
behaviour
notch
with
the upper
this
of
work
impact
A later
Also,
in
not
contrast
to
disappearance
polished.
ISO/DIS
increase
levelling off
initial
mechanism
(850 test:
distinct
Summers
of
It
et
maximum
was
[149J
81
when
concluded
did
the
that
samples
the
this study
observe
were
most
the
press
efficient
et
[151],
81
pipes
for
also,
tensile
evaluated
propert i es.
the
Yield
as
discriminating
post-yield
temperatures
PVC.
revealed
for
tests
at
maximum at
gelation
levels.
different
the approximate
test
for
Te,
test
was
related
to
an
Alternatively,
increase
in
cold
in
and
crystallites.
whole
or
part,
post-yield parameters
drawing and
thus
These
by
tensile results
number
of
are
workers
[131]
provides
recent
correlation
between
and a
mechanism of
'CDFE'
fusion
was
conjectured
based
upon the
Page
51
Introduction/l
levels
gelation
temperatures.
unaffected
Yield
by
different
at
properties
fusion
level
and
maximum
break
value
again,
were
seen
test
to
attributed
between
be
to
however elongation at
were dependant
occurred
and
rates
were,
test
break
fusion
levels
40-65%
A
as
of
processing
tensile
temperature
properties
were
193-203'C
related
to
and
the
the
optimum
existence
of
continuing
development
performance
using
of
an
network
notched
coherence.
Izod
specimen
Impact
on
an
The
40-50%,
similar
ductility tests;
to
results
obtained
for
post-yield
interaction
and
of
impact
the
preparation,
of
modifiers,
complete
have
is
extrusion
extrusion and,
Lubricants
additives,
finally,
been
not
such
as
well
lubricants,
understood
process
i.e.
in
add i t ive
product performance.
thoroughly
investigated
by
(1. 2. 3. 3).
external
type
effective melt
mechanism,
Processing
lubricants
1. e.
external
studies
delay
fusion
have
or internal or
suggested
while
viscosity [22,33-34,36,142,154],
that
lowering
the
however the
Marshall
et
a1 [113]
showed that a
higher level
Page
52
Introductionll
delay
in
an
which
approach
introduction of lubricants.
studies
whereby
properties
and
an
can
be
applied
to
the
extrusion
problems
are
overcome
by
the
overall
conclusion
suggests
that
the
balance
between
introduction of
have
although
been
little
consequences
of
appreciable amounts of
evaluated
work
has
to
some
processing
conditions
(1.2.4.5)
extent
published
been
as
and/or
mineral
to
the
formulation
aspects.
Finally
impact
the
performance
effect
of
of
impact
processing
modified
conditions
grades
upon
have
been
in the
area of structure,
gener~l
project
aims
to
continue
this
theme,
albeit,
and
in
different direction.
The overall objective of this project is to provide
a
fuller
blending,
properties
understanding
formulat ion,
for
filled
of
the
extrusion
UP VC
relat ionships
conditions
compositions.
hopefully,
and
between
product
knowledge
of
lead to a optimisation
The mechanism of
fusion
for
a gi ven processing
Page
53
Introduction/l
is observed
A number
established
of
experimental
which
can
techniques
provide
have
been
quantitative
Little
work
incorporation
is
published
upon
part icularly,
and,
the
filler
effect
of
Formulation
studies
have
attempted
not
to
The
introduction
economically
process,
of
desirable
low
since
such as extrusion,
cost
additives
is
material
costs
accounts for
in
70% [156)
Incorporate
filler
into
appreciable
base
amounts
composition
of
and
mineral
monitor
any
Process
processing
the
window
filled
in
within
broad
establish
fuller
grades
order
to
Evaluate
fusion,
the
filler
pipe
extrudate
dispersion,
for
surface
degree
appearance
of
and
Analyse
possible
relationships
between
Alter
addition
the
of
balance
specific
of
the
lubricant
lubricants
and
system
observe
by
the
Consider
t he effect
of
impact
Page
54-
Introduction/l
Figure
1.
18
presents
schematic
layout
of
the
BASE COMPOSITION
+
FILLER
BASE COMPOSITION
+
FILLER
+
IMPACT MODIFIERS
BASE COMPOSITION
+
FILLER
+
DIFFERENT LUBRICANTS
I DRY BLENDING I
DRY BLEND CHARACTERISATION
Bulk density
Ash content
I PIPE
EXTRUDATES
I
MECHANICAL
PROPERTIES
-Tensile
-Instrumented
impact
I
SURFACE
APPEARANCE
-Visual
-SEM
I
FUSION
ASSESSMENT
-DTA
-Solvent
-Microscopy
I
FILLER
DISPERSION
-Microscopy
-SEM
I CONCLUSIONS I
RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BLENDING, FORMULATION,
EXTRUSION, FUSION AND PRODUCT PROPERTIES
Page
55
CHAPTER 710/0
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
2. 1 INTRODUCTION
The
interest:
project
i)
effect
impact
Therefore
objectives
of
effect
were
upon
unfilled
prepared
two
main
processing,
of additives,
upon
modifiers,
samples
filler
defined
for
areas
fusion
of
and
such as lubricants
and
filled
subsequent
systems.
test ing
in
two stages.
2.2 PVC FORMULATION
A general purpose UPVC pipe formulation,
Cookson group plc,
supplied by
100
Filler Polcarb S
0=50
Stabiliser/lubricant system
Tribasic lead sulphate
20
12
Calcium stearate
04
Primary lubricant:
t
These
Sasol H1
01-
Increments of 10 phr
compositions
were
used
exclusively
in
the
Page
56
Experiment 01/2
suspension
PVC
polymer,
particularly
suited
to
The
568/173
Grade
568/173
116
68
056
Relative density
1'40
)99
less than
<
<
75 flm
(%)
5
O' 3
2.2.2 FILLER
A
stearate
coated
fine
carbonate
calcium
representative
material
and
the
technical
specification
sulphate
and
versatile
<TBL5:
stabiliser,
commonly
which
used
is
in
powerful
twin
screw
extrusion.
Normal
lead
st earat e
(NL5t:
Pb (CH, (CH.)
16
COO.
is
Page
57
Experimental/2
(CaSt:
is
not
lubricant.
last
component
of
this
combined
point,
and
C SO H'02)
crystalline,
is
paraffin wax
predominantly
stabiliser/
which is a high
(average
classed
as
an
formula:
external
lubricant.
Detailed technical data on the above ingredients is
provided in Appendix A.
TABLE 2.3
Technical data forPolcarb S
85
10
001
(max)
05
(max)
less than
860 3
2 flm
70
18
(max)
02
Moisture (%)
Chemical anal)lsis (%)
970
calcium carbonate
acidic residues
l' 8
stearate addition
l' 0
of
processing
second
stage
lubricants
and
of
study
impact
and
properties
this
of
an
investigated
modifiers
unfilled
and
upon
a
the
the
heavily
Page
56
Experimental/2
shown in table 2. I,
impact
modifiers.
Table
2.4
secondly,
lists
the
the addition of
type
and
level
of
TABLE 2.4
Description of lubricants and modifiers
Addit ive
reference
Description
phr
Lubricant
Sasol HI
Oletec 6009
Oletec 6009
Loxiol 012
Loxiol 015
PE 520
Pristerene 4903
O' 1
0'2
l' 0
l' 0
l' 0
0'2
l' 0
Modifier
Dow 3615
KM 323B
Chlorinated polyethylene
All-Acrylic
Sample
code
A
B
C
D
E
10' 0
100
30
phr
of
Polcarb
and
also
in
an
unfilled
composi t ion.
2.4 DRY BLENDING
Two high speed mixers were initially investigated:
8
litre
T. K. Fielder
study [168l
and
40
litre
Henschel.
previous
of filler
segregation
in
All
int ensi ve
and
an
the
mixer
t emperat ure,
therefore
attempt
main
to attain a
blending
was
rotor
further
var.ied
speed
significant improvement
experimentation
representative
parameters
(1.
and
e.
bat ch
batch
for
was
filled
the
Fielder
weight,
jacket
sequence)
and
no
59
Experimental/ 2
Thus the geometry and size of the mixer was not considered
appropriate to provide highly filled dry blends.
The operating conditions of the Henschel mixer were
also studied,
In this
<increase in fill
factor)
2.1
illustrates
the
basic
layout
of
dry
heater
mixer
is
the
started
and
the
impellor
speed
was
the
<the
cooler
material
was
<low
of
the
30-40C.
55 secs for
batches
was
heating)
dryblend
dumped
material
was dumped to
frictional
cooled
temperature
mins
automatically
the
carefully
The
<3-5
and
the
mins)
cooled
cooled
to
premix
jacket
handling
was
then
at
mins
to
ensure
:!:
as shown in Appendix B,
yield
The
filler
content
<phr).
calibration
graph
to
was
and
hand
mixed.
An
average
of
three results
were
Page
60
Experimental/2
FIGURE 2. 1
Dry blending process
BATCH WEIGHT
18KG
HEATER MIXER
DISCHARGE @ 120C
COOLER MIXER
DISCHARGE @ 30-40C
tall
graduated
volumeter~
cylinder
and
vibrated
using
Tap-pack
equilibrated.
powder weight
to final
and
an
accuracy
of
volume.
1 cm'
was
equivalent
to
tap
Krauss
Maffei
KMDL-25
twin
screw
extruder
at
counter-rotating
fully
machine
literature [131,142,154];
has
been
described
in
the
Page
61
Ezperimental/2
TABLE 2.5
Machine details of KMDL-25
Screw diameter
25
tip
50 mm
. feed
The
mm
Screw length
400 mm
Screw speed
5 05-50' 5 rpm
5'19 Nm
O 265-2' 65 kW
"'lS kg/hr
screw
configuration
is
shown
in
figure
2.2
[ 169J .
FIGURE 2.2
KMDL-25 Screw design
~'
A . '
'
..
.. - .
A-B
at
all
stages
within
the
extrusion
process.
pre~sure
Page
62
Experimenta1l2
FIGURE 2.3
Instrumentation of KMDL-25
P3/TM2
P1
P2ITM1
HOPPER
FEED
TM3
Die
Barrel
Where:
Screw
("C)
("C)
("C)
Pl
(Bar)
P2
= Adaptor pressure
(Bar)
P3
(Bar)
bot h
proportional
hardware
systems
controllers
provides
measurements
and,
a
in
carefully
are
and
thermocouples.
continuous
addition,
hardcopy
monitored
The
of
indicates torque
by
attached
the
above
(TQ:
% of
premixes
were
rpm).
The
conditions
under
which
the
the
Page
63
Experimenta1l2
TABLE 2.6
Extrusion conditions
EXTRUDER PROFILE CODE
VARIABLE
At
Bt
G*
Screw speed
(rpm)
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
Volumetric feeder
(rpm)
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
Zone 1 temperature
( '0
165
165
165
180
180
200
210
Zone 2 temperature
("C)
165
165
165
180
180
200
210
Screw temperature
( 'C)
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
Head temperature
( 'C)
165
170
180
180
190
200
210
165
170
180
180
190
200
210
* Degradation
The
and
above
each
table
ext ruder
increment.
indicates
profile
wide
used
was
processing
for
range
each
filler
(increments
of
followed
of
representing
phr
10
code
Polcarb
shown above.
was
S)
Thus
incorporat ion
low
extrusion
since
flood
of
temperatures.
feeding
quantities of
filler
and
The
extruder
starve
fed
the
machine
limit
for
substant ial
tripped
was
torque
The
feeding
hopper
and
adhere
ultimately,
lead
to
the
to
the
volumetric
surging.
screw
These
feeder
problems
and
were
also aided
The feeding of
bet ween
Page
64-
Experlmental/2
heavily
filled
dry
blend
and
progression
dry
filled;
head
pressure;
reduction
in
the
st eady
feed
rate.
graphical
reduct ion
However,
filled
out put
in
of
torque
after
to
blend
than
by
lightly
filled
rather
of
lightly
heavily
torque and
indicat ed
applying
the
above
remedies,
20 mins)
wat er
trough
eccentricity.
length
per
subj ect ed
uni t
The
unit
to
pipe
time
t he
sect ion
output
and
methylene
was
moni t ored
for
measured
as
mass
and
length
of
pipe
was
small
chloride
was
test
(MCT:
15
minut es
be obtained for
extrusion
extensibility and at
the
highest
G,
degradation/' burn
up'
phr
profile
was evident,
as
an
code
indicator
considered,
of
the
maximum
processing
temperature
condition,
profile provided a
(0
code
or 30
E
and
phr
was
chosen
since
this
Polcarb S:
then
E,
profile
lastly
!l2.3)
a
followed
by the extrusion
lubricant/modifier
code
as
described in table 2. 4.
Page
65
Experimental/2
surface
appearance
of
pipes
was
qualitatively
assessed by:
i)
Visual
observation:
the
pipes
were
ranked
in
order of roughness.
ii)
the pipe,
small
samples of
were
sputter coated
microscope.
The
surface
appearance
was
3-5
dispersion
sections
~m
'D'
was
observed
by
optical
a
Leitz
The section
was mounted between a glass slide and glass cover slip using
cedarwood
oil
as
suitable
mounting
fluid.
The
sections
microscope
observed
degraded then
lead
to
of
via
the
fluorescence
formation
primary
of
microscopy.
If
PVC
an conjugated species
fluorescence
in
the
visible
is
will
region.
this
history,
t echn:i.que
provides
an
indicat ion
of
processing
The
Page
66
Experimenta1l2
vapour
lamp.
filter
for
barrier
The
also
fil t er,
spect rum
attachment
for
[170].
only
photographed
420,
LP
using
365
emission at
sect ions
special
0365
t ransmiss10n
The
housed
UV
of
nm and a
the
were
exciter
visi bl e
focussed
objective;
and
Plan-Neufluor
16/0' 50.
2.9 ASSESSMENT OF FUSION
2.9.1 ACETONE SHEARING TEST
Summers
et
[109]
81
described
optical microscopy
discriminating
immersion tests.
mm
cube)
glass
were
were
common
light
then
traditional
stoppered
samples
power
from
tubes
sheared
the
of
pipe
between
microscopy
(approximately 2
samples
acetone for
glass
and
immersed
hours.
slides
(Zeiss
solvent
in
The treated
and
universal
viewed
via
microscope:
fusion
levels
discussed in l.4.2.5.
Thermal
Analyser
of
thermal
of
processed
PVC
as
tool
for
has already
been
with
Du
Pont
reference pan
positions
analysis
on
DSC
(empty)
constantan
cell.
An
aluminium
The
disc
is
the
block is heated at
and heat
is efficiently transferred
disc
the
to
separate
pans.
The
through
chromel-constantan
on
This
x-y
constant
thermocouples
rate
the constantan
differential
heat
flow
pan is measured
positioned
underneath
plotter
versus
sample
temperature.
Page
The
67
Experimenta1l2
mat erials,
sharp
values,
such
melting
and
thus
as
t in
pOints
the
cell
and
with
indi umj
precise
can
be
these
mat erial s
heat
of
fusion
calibrated
for
energy
corrosion by noxious
gases.
Figure 2.4 illustrates a typical DSC thermogram of a
'moderately'
features
noted.
Small
samples
of
pipe
(10-12
mg)
are scanned
from
1 and 2 mY/cm.
minimum of three
a rate of
60 cc/min.
FIGURE 2.4
Typical DSC thermogram
Signal
EXO
tl
~
ENDO
. . ,.
128
,.
14..
\_
Temperature (oC)
..
Page
68
Experimenta1l2
and
converted
and 'B'
into
can be determined by a
heats
of
fusion
by
the
following relationship:
Where
loHF
A
m
(2. 1)
(60 B E logs)
= Heat of fusion
(Jig)
= Sample mass
(g)
2. 10 MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
2. 10. 1 TENSILE TESTING
Tensile
samples
J. J
and
specimens
uniaxial
Lloyd universal
infra-red
prepared
with
tensile
cutting,
press
die
The
the
(T5002)
dumb-bell
parallel
and
from
the
properties evaluated
the
to
using
pieces
extrusion
were
direction,
conformed
Part A2
pipe
fitted with an
test
pieces
test
prepared
testing machine
extensometer.
by
were
(1971)
to
the
standard
(figure 2.5).
FIGURE 2.5
Tensile specimen:
Type 1
P,)SltlOn
tines
of reference
Page
69
Experimenta1l2
Where
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
75
Width at ends
125
:!:
25
:!:
4'0
:!:
0'1
Small radius
80
:!:
05
Large radius
12'5
:!:
10
20
40
Thickness (preferred)
:!:
2'0
mm/min
and
at
room
temperature
conditions.
An
initial
resultant
force-extension
graphs
were
used
to
Yield stress
= (Ta =
= (Tv
Fe
(2. 3)
A
Fv
(2.4)
A
Elongation at yield
= v =
(I v-la)
-------
x100%
(2. 5)
------- x 100%
(2. 6)
10
(le-la)
Elongation at break
= a =
10
Where
Fe
A
=
=
Force at break
Cross-sectional
dumb-bell
Fv
Iv
10
le
=
=
=
=
(N)
area
of
waisted portion
of
(mm 2 )
(N)
(mm)
(mm)
Extension at break
(mm)
Page
70
Experimental/2
Traditionally,
Gardner
type
failure
rate
impact
evaluation
tests
is
tests
information
reduce
has
where an
upon
been
failure
More
recently,
used
failure
the number
of
which
mechanisms,
t est
Charpy,
impact
determined.
have
included
pieces.
Izod
energy
and
or
50%
instrumented
can
provide
product
more
testing
and
bet ween
differ
from
the
presence
of
maximum
and
to
weight
impact
tester
The basic
[ 172J.
A
impactor
this
Kistler~
probe
and
arrangement,
transducer
is
the
impact
weight;
impactor
probe
the
gravity,
trigger
optic
begin
data
fracture
which
collection
event
may
be
activates
of
the
only a
however
positioned
on
between
drop release
accelerates,
of
to
force
transient
signal
recorder
with
time.
few thousandths of
the
due
the
12
bit
transient
to
The
second
recorder
The
as
A microcomputer
storage,
microcomputer
force-time
or
can
force-deflection
the
graphs
force or energy,
fracture
and
such as
Page
71
Exper1menta1l2
FIGURE 2.6
Instrumented impact tester
COLUMN
Catcher/Release
Fa16ngWeighl
Trigger Switch Unit
t"O;:llo-S .... 'IC.tn
Camp Release
Stripper
'Safety-Rod~ Unit
Safely-Rod position
adjuster
1i'r'~"r<::-+-7"e::...._-----t-
MagnelicSwiICh
(Safely i'lIer~
~~~---------------t-Door~D
SAMPLE AREA
Page
72
Experimentall2
FIGURE 2.7
Force-deformation trace
Force (KN)
Slope
Peak
force
-----j-
Distance
. (mm)
Deformation
at
peak force
Deformation at
failure
failure
occurring
beyond
yield.
Brittle/ductile
and
lastly
deformation
brittle
values
with
fracture
difficulty
produces
in
low
force
discerning
and
between
which
supports
an
unclamped
length of
pipe.
'V'
45'
However
tested
surface(s);
did
not
instead,
allow
complete
fracture
of
the
pipe
Page
73
Ezper1mental/2
FIGURE 2.8
Typical Pipe fracture
Force (N)
.........
...
:':
i!
..--'~
, '
.,I
: ~
/
I
~
~.
,
'
,f
:;'
~-;
!
:
.
:.
,
/ if
/ ./
.:
I ,r"
i !
I
,.'-
. . .::~,
" ,
,
,!
....
..
/ ,/
BritUe
--_. Brittle/Ductile
....... Ductile
,
,,
Defonnation (mm)
pipe
walls.
Thus
further
work
considered
number
of
clamped
J(2gh)
(2.7)
Page
74
Experimental/2
Where
\)
Velocity (m/s)
Test height
and
proposal [173J.
1. e.
(m)
suggested
by a
draft
BSI
available
impact
energy
can
be
determined
at
Where
(2.8)
Eo
mgh
Eo
Impact mass
(25'35 kg)
(981 m/s 2
Test height
impact
energy
is
impact
energy;
since
It
must
large
a
in
force-deformation
maximum
permitted
satisfy
this
trace.
and
can
test
of
the available
comparison
the
absorbed
impact
velocity
large reduction
[173J
criterion
energy at
be ensured that
(m)
(J)
with
in
the characteristics of
reduction
the
impact
be .estimated
of
mass
by
20%
is
required
the
the
to
following
equat ion.
3 x
Where
m
EToT
(2.9)
g.h
Test height
(J)
(m)
Page
75
Experimental/2
In
all
cases
the
reduction
in
impact
velocity
was
FILTERING
The force
signal
of
inst rument ed
impact
test ers
is
in
brittle materials>.
true
characteristics
of
peak
values
peak
such
as
the
filter
digital
filter
which
fracture
force.
incorporates non-resonant
digital
<especially for
The
behaviour
Rosand
materials such as
can
'post-filter'
reduce
impact
tester
titanium and a
the
to
or
Signal;
this
be chosen after
<1'5-~
BRITTLE-DUCTILE TRANSITIONS
The
majority
temperature.
F
of
testing
was
performed
at
room
testing.
~1,
60,
were
for
100'C
conditioned
in
C.
cold
-10,
0,
10,
20,
finger
bath of
ethylene glycol
in a
hot
during
removal
of
minimum of 8
sample
from
the
hours.
medium
Heat
transfer
to the
specimen
cycle
and
was
approximately
seconds
the
impact
rig
was
Page
76
Experimenta1l2
Impactor tip
10 mm hemispherical (ISO)
Impact speed
~. ~
Impact height
1'0 m
Impact mass
25'35 kg
Number of specimens
10 (minimum)
Sweep time
5, 10 and 20 ms
1'5, 2'0,
Test temperature
m/s
3'0 and
~O
kHz
EXTRUDER PROFILES:
&
tested
in
the
longitudinally
above
split
compression press at
manner,
and
125'C,
These
extrudates
a
hot
were
placed
in
upstroking
after a
period of 10 minutes a
The
the
using a
pI at ens.
DIN anvil
The
result ant
sheet s
were
impact
with a
ring
Page
77
CHAPTER 771REE
PROCESSING RESUL TS
3. 1 DRY BLENDING
The dry
compositions can
were
determined,
suggested
and
that
blending
compositions
as described
careful
control
sequence
containing
were
The optimum
in 2.4,
on
overall
necessary
representative
and
amounts
the
batch
to
obtain
of
filler.
50
phr
respectively).
The
higher
levels
of
filler
Blend
code
Filler
level
<phr)
Discharge
time
<min)
8'5"
10
8'10"
20
8'5"
30
8'10"
40
8'45"
50
9'45"
All
the
blends
<O,3E-
to
O,3EH)
produced
for
the
and
thus
affect
the blending
time.
Page
78
Processing/3
The
Ash
content
(phr)
Volume
fraction
(% VoU
00
0'0
85
0046
181
O' 1208
27'1
0'163
35'6
O 2228
400
O' 2569
Blend
code
A good
filler
loading
agreement
and
is
ash
obtained
content
upto
loadings of
40 and 50
result
t he
in a
mixer
chamber,
phr.
1. e.
between the
the
expected
higher
filler
mixer
foul ing.
These resul t s
are
possible
filler
loss
leads
to
reduction
in
the
and
yielded
i. e.
phr
compositions
30
similar
results
indicated
to
a
the above
filler
table,
content
of
Page
79
Processing/3
(TAP) DENSITY
3. 1. 1. 2 BULK
Tap density
pack
efficiently
indicates
and
the ability
possibly
the
effect
for
of
the
powder
to
particle
the
Tap (Bulk)
density
(g/cm' )
Filler
content
(phr)
00
073
8'5
075
18' 1
O' 78
27'3
O' 79
356
086
40'9
096
BLEND CODE
Filler
code
Figure
increase
in
approxi~tely
observed.
3. 1
tap
30
illustrates
densi t y
phr,
where
upt 0
a
an
a
approximate
filler
exponential
linear
content
of
increase
is
effect upon tap density of the base composition and that the
effect of filler is more prominent.
Page
80
Processing/3
FIGURE 3.1
Top density versus Filler contem
Tap density (g/cm3)
1.05 , . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
:"
0.95
0.85
0.75
. :
10
20
30
filler content (phr)
::
40
FIGURE 3.2
Top density for Additive blends
Top density (g/cm.3)
0.95,....---------------...,
0.90
0.85
Additive code
Page
81
Process1ng/3
electron
micrographs
of
the
dry
blended
3.B
inclusive.
unfilled
dry
Figure
blend
3.3
(0)
and
3.4
illustrate
resembles
that
of
that
the
the
virgin
the
of
the
filler
lightly
is
located
presence
can
be
and
element
map
as
by
the
filler
coating
grain
of
in
level,
surface
to
figure
in
the
1B'1
phr
phr,
1B'1
and
large
is . coated.
of
the
produce
3.7.
The
fold
however it
of
grain
filler
calcium
map
is
the
the filler
the
particle
reveals
much
proportion of
folds
situated
filler
suggest
(1),
calcium carbonate
blend,
the
analysis
illustrated
preferentially
within
of
X-ray
dry
position
detected
filled
The
further
more
the
increase
even
available
in
filler
is evident
that
at a
filler level of
completely covered
by
filler.
The
micrographs
explain
the
difficulty
blends
and
the
of
the
observed
results
characterist ics.
surface
presented
moderate
PVC
grains
onto the
in
level
and
is
polymer
for
of
some
to
blending
obtained
possibly adsorbed
can,
representative
the
filler
therefore
surface.
ext en t ,
dry
blend
coats
the
at t ached
A higher
level
or
the
this free
system.
If
the
filler
above
are
considered
then
the
dry
fo~ling
of the
Page
82
Processing/3
FIGURE 3.3:
("lOO)
280 flm
1----------1
FIGURE 3.4:
28 flm
1----------1
Page
83
Processing/3
FIGURE 3.5:
--
---~
280 flm
1----------1
FIGURE 3.6:
28 flm
1----------1
Page
84-
Processing/3
28 flm
1----------1
FIGURE 3.8:
28 flm
1----------1
______________ J
Page
85
Processing/3
mixer i.e.
to
the higher
specific gravity
modal
particle
filler
density
size
of
until
distribution,
increases -dramatically
the
At
filler
an
the
bi-
approximate
this value,
since
and
'free'
the tap
filler
for
each
extruder
profile
and
composition
chosen,
of
the
ext ruder
and
temperatures,
the
processing
These results,
such as oil
reproducible temperature
extruder at
that
not
specific
point
or
material temperature.
melt
temperature
to
particular- profile/composition
run
the
temperature
inability
to
of
accurately
the
surrounding
calibrate
metal
the
and
the
thermocouple/
results
which
can
be
used
to
assess
the
FILLER CONTENT
instrumented
screw torque as a
extruder
percentage of
the
continuously
monitors
Page
86
Processing/3
also
torque
can
be
related
to
the
measured output
by
the
2ft . SS .
(TQ-TQo)
(3. 1)
III
Where
SS
Screw speed
TQ
TQo =
Extruder
III
(20 rpm)
Specific
(g/min)
throughput
mB.SS
measure of
the
D.2
presents
extruded
at
the
data
profiles
A-F
for
the
filled
inclusive,
while
can
are
be
seen
produced
from
the
as
might
and
figures
be
that
expected
and,
an
generally,
increase
in
family
there
is
of
a
from profile A to
torque
and
with
dist inct
deviat ion
is
observed
at
approximat e
E and Fi
a levelling
in
the
true
extrusion
process.
final
from
Since a
'melt'
data
then
of
filler
temperature is not
it
is difficult
to
processing temperature,
1. 4. 2. 5)
and
the
(the DSC
interrelations
technique
will
be
described
discussed
in
Page
87
!14. 1. 1.
Processlng/3
FIGURE 3.9
Torque versus Filler content
Torque (r.)
.20
...
..
c
D
...
E
F
"f::::---.~----
.L-______
______
______
________
...
~ontennph~
filler
~~
FIGURE 3.10
~ech an icol
(rev.To/g)
ft
..
~--------------------------------~
A
B
..
..
..
~---
D
E
F
I.
______
______
________L-______
__--'
Page
88
Processing/3
extrusion
FILLER CONTENT
pressures
within
the
Krauss
Maffei
inlet
3. 11
3. 12
respect i vely.
PI,
adapt or
head
and
zone,
illustrate
The
is
and
pressure
particular blend,
and
the
st art
at
insignificant
head
head
zones
unless
are
inlet
of
the
the
the
discharge
pressures
relat i vely
indicating that
pressures
high
length of
in
the
for
the
the solidi
and
thus
illustrates
appearance
to
producing
series
the
of
torque
response
quadratic
and
at
PI.
Figure
3. 11
curves
similar
in
measurements;
clearly
the
significant
influence
of
head
the
identical
temperature
Figure
3.12
content
and
profile.
The
represents
a
linear
lines
are
the
inlet
relationship
not
parallel
pressure
versus
is observed
and
again
for
the
ADDITIVE STUDY
these
values
inclusive.
be
represented
in
figures
3. 13-3. 16
Page
89
Processing/3
of
extrudates
and
wide
which
filler
attributed
to
incorporated
range.
the
extruder
stage of processing;
additive series
These
wide
apparent
being
processing
window
differences
rebuilt
after
can
the
be
first
are not
identical which
data
also
are
the
reproducible
value
throughput,
of
is
within
which
Q,
similar
each
accounts
for
the
distinct
for
series
differing
processing
of
and
mass
identical
noted for
P1,
is
the
filled blends.
Figures
effect
of
3.13
small
and
an
reveal
unfilled
the
produce
change of
upon the
formulation.
trend
similar
pipe
same
demonstrate
concentration
3.14
Q,
i. e.
ranking
first
then
the
significant
an additive and
processing characteristics
The
bar
head
order
chart s
and
for
pipe- codes
general 1 y
inlet
pressure
additives
the
considered
the
can be
ranked
in
HIGH
OEB
OEF
OEA
OEC
OE-
OED
OEE
Head pressure
OEB
OEF
OEA
OE-
OEC
OED
OEE
It
explanation
is,
for
of
course,
the
trend
difficult
without
to
provide
details
full
upon
melt
present ed at
this stage.
Page
90
Processing/3
FIGURE 3.11
Head pressure versus Filler conlenl
Head pressure (Bar)
~
r---------------------------------,
A
B
o
E
..
~----_L_
______'--___
18
28
_1._ _ _ ___+--...J
38
FIGURE 3.12
Inlet pressure \/emus Filler contenl
Inlet pressure .(8ar)
...
A
B
C
o
E
F
'"
.oL...._____..J...._ _ _ _
le
filler
~ontent
(phr)
....
Page
91
Processing/3
of a
paraffin wax
produce a
high
polyethylene
m. pt
wax
<OEE)
pressure
characteristics
when
paraff in
wax
equal
used
in
(OEC)
and
castor
oil
(OED)
high torque
compared
to
proport ions
and
low
m.pt
<OEA).
The
resulted
does
alternatively a
yielded
(OEB)
in
say,
higher
head
a paraffin wax.
(OEG)
does
not
affect
the
processing
3.15
and
3.16
illustrate
the
processing
It can be seen
HIGH
3EB
3EF
3ED
3E-
3EC
3EE
3EA
Head pressure
3EF
3EB
3EE
3E-
3EC
3ED
3EA
In
dramatic
this
as
exceptions of
series
for
the
3EB and
the
effect
unfilled
3EF,
of
lubricant
compositions
is
not
with
as
the
although a
be
brief
expanded
introduction
in
fundamental results,
later
to
chapters
the
extrusion
when
results
discussion
upon
is presented.
Page
92
Process1ng/3
FIGURE 3.13
Torque and Q for Additive blend.
Ophr
60
1"""'lTorque
I!!!!!!!I Q
50
40
30
:,
:'
20
10
Additi\le code
FIGURE 3.14
Extrusion pressure for Additive blends
Heodjinlet pressure (Bar)
240r---------------------------,
Ophr
200
l!lZ!JHeod
IiiiliIiIiilnlet
160
A B
Additi\le code
Page
93
Processing/3
FIGURE 3.15
Torque and Q for Additive blend.
Torque (7.). Q (rev.7.I9)
70~----------------------------'
27-28 phr
1"""'lTorque
50
==Q
40
30
20
10
Additive code
FIGURE 3.16
Extrusion pressure for Additive blends
Heod/inlet pressure (Bar)
24Or--------------------------.
27-28 phr
200
1,,,IHeod
EiilIliIlnlet
160
120
80
40
Additive code
Page
94
Processing/3
aesthetic
important
parameter
arbitrary
assessment
commonplace.
surface
All
finish;
appearance
in
an
extrudate
extrusion
the
based
of
upon
is
an
and
an
examinat ion
is
process
visual
the
outer
and
inner
surfaces
arbitrary
nature
difficulties,
of
however
such
the
an
assessment
pipes
were
were
Obviously
can
relatively
present
easily
OUTER SURFACE
1. e.
brown tint
the
wide
due to
filler range
can
be
GROUP
II
III
IV
VI
5A,B
4A,B
5C-F
3A-D
3F
2F
4C-F
2A,B
3E
2C,D
IF
lA,B
OA,B
lC,D
OC,D
2E
lE
OE
Where I
= poor
extrud~r
that
profile
an
(A~F)
OF
= best
increase
in
the
leads to a better
filler
level
of
approximately
30
phr.
The texture
Page
and
95
ProcessingJ3
the
ext rudat e
appearance
can
also
be
ranked
in
TABLE 3.5
Outer surface of additive series
GROUP
V
IV
VI
OEA
OE-
OEF
3E3EE,F
OEB-E
3EH
OEH
OEG
3EA-D
3EG
the
impact
surface
finish
modifier;
in
with
this
the exception
case
clear
of the acrylic
improvement
is
observed.
3.3.2 APPEARANCE:
The
INNER SURFACE
inner
surface
is
often
extrudates
for
this
study
can
considered
in
the
be
ordered in
terms
of
quality.
The
inner
processing and
more difficult
is,
the reverse of
and are
However it
Page
96
Processing/3
TABl.E 3.6
GROUP
IV
III
Il
OB-F
lC,O
OA
lE,F
20,E
lA,B
4C
2A-C
4E,F
2F
5C-F
3A-F
4A.B
40
5A,B
Table
3.7
presents the
approximate
ranking
of
the
GROUP t
Il
III
IV
VI
OEG
OEA-F
3EO
3E-
OEH
3EG
3EA
3EB,C
3EH
3EE
3EF
It
is
Page
97
Processing/3
the
extrudates
passed
the
methylene
chloride
processed
using
profile
Other
showed
not
fail.
The
pipes
extruded
at
low
processing
Page
98
CHAPTER FOUR
thermal
analysis,
discussed
in
parameters:
onset
2. 6. 1
were
assessed
All
for
of peak'S'
as described in
the extrudates
the
(6HA>,
following
heat of fusion
temperature>.
(' S'
% Fusion
Where
6H MAX -
=
=
=
6H A
6Hp
6HMAX
(4. 1 >
100
6Hp
(1053 Jig>
was
obtained
for
the
virgin
of
polymer
1)
this
was
for completeness.
The
A negligible
100% fusion.
and
the
were corrected,
values
obtained
for
the
filled
compositions
on a weight
Page
99
TABLE 4. 1
Thermal Analysis of filled compositions
Pipe
code
b.H A
b.He
fusion
(J Ig)
(J Ig)
OA
OS
OC
00
OE
OF
1703
172- 7
175-2
178-6
167-2
197-5
0'43
1'11
255
3'25
537
763
193
180
166
l' 13
049
O' 12
l' 4
8- 1
22- 1
29-0
49-6
71' 7
lA
IB
lC
10
lE
IF
1757
1740
1840
166'6
193'2
2035
369
l' 69
5'91
5'96
757
937
1 25
1'06
074
063
O' 13
O' 10
33-3
13-7
54-9
55'4
71' 1
88-7
2A
2B
2C
20
2E
2F
1757
1765
185'6
186'7
195'3
203-2
l' 68
304
5-27
521
6-41
992
l' 35
1 24
075
072
027
004
13-7
26'9
487
48' 1
79-3
94' 1
3A
3B
3C
3D
3E
3F
1742
178-0
186-2
190-2
1952
207-3
2- 13
2-87
5-69
622
8- 16
11- 18
l' 29
0'99
0'77
0'34
028
0'00
18'0
253
528
58'0
769
106'4
4A
4B
4C
40
4E
4F
175'8
1800
192'8
1933
194 8
203'5
1- 97
2-34
7'63
7' 13
7'96
931
l' 42
1 15
0'42
0'42
036
000
16'4
20- 1
71- 7
66-9
74-9
68-2
5A
5B
5C
50
5E
5F
1797
177-7
1882
1922
195-8
204'5
3 15
282
5-92
7 12
7-35
9' 45
1 41
1'14
O 51
038
025
0-00
26-0
24'8
55 1
668
690
895
Page 100
Fusion and
4.1.1 'B'
ONSET TEMPERATURE
The
onset
compared with
via
temperature
the
indicated
of
line relationship
for
temperature.
'B'
peak
can
temperature
arrangement
be
recorded
(table
D.
as
1)
straight
series
the
extrusion
thermocouple/transducer
the
Microscopy/~
are
is
observed,
shifted
to
higher
recorded
head
as indicated in 3.2,
is
temperature at
calibrate
the
that
transducer
or
point.
the
Also
the inability
recording
device
to
suggests
calibration
extrudates;
different
can
these
trial
be
observed
extrudates
for
were
the
The problem
series
processed
of
during
onset
for
peak 'A'
at
their
measurement
were in fact
respective
suggested,
in
t emperat ure
although
is
case,
best
energy
values
obtained
profile
t his
the
temperatures.
t hat
an
indicat ed
It
est imat e
by t he
is
of
therefore
processing
indirect
method
of
thermal analysis.
Figure
profiles
illustrates
4.2
chosen
for
this
processing temperature
('B'
the
study
onset).
effect
upon
of the
the
extruder
estimated
consideration.
Little
t emperat ures
temperature
effective
to C,
'B'
is
and
the
difference
temperature,
in
thus
major
it
would
variable
an
seem that
in
Changing
to F resulted in a
fact
seen
between
processing temperature.
D to E and E
is
increase
the
head
controlling
the
profiles
from B
10C
is
observed
Page 101
FIGURE 4.1
'S' Onset versu. Head temperoture
...
- DATA
Grodienl =1
... - 0 Series
...
- ---
a
a
-9D
aa
a
lee
Cl
Cl
B_
?a
.~
&-______-L______
...
178
________L_______
lee
198
______
2'.
28Q
FIGURE 4.2
'B' Onset versus Extrusion profile
'B' Onset (oC)
2
:zoo
I
...
I
I
I
I
...
?a
L-____~----=-----~----~~----=_----_=---J
Extru.ion Profile
Page 102
temperature.
to
The effect
marginal
of
increase.
in
'B'
onset
leads
temperature
at
filled systems.
in 3. 2. 1-3.2.2
versus
'B'
onset
temperature.
in
ext rusion
value
(head pressure
or
Q)
wi than
linear
the
multiple
components
temperature with a
4.2
depicts
the
linear
correlation
the
regression
of
filler
analysis was
content
measured extrusion
relationship
regression
suggests
an
analysis,
processing
property.
Expression
these
the
of
expression 4.3,
and
coefficient
of
regression
= 721523 + 3'982(XF) -
Correlation (r)
SD of errors
Where
components
acceptable. model,
multiple
=
=
to
and
transformation
YP
the
between
used
however
further
analysis,
3'416(xs)
via
(4.2)
097
14' 73
yp
XF
= filler content
Xs
(Bar)
(phr)
Page 103
Fusion and
M1croscopy/~
FIGURE 4,3
Head pressure versus 'B' Onset
Head pressure (8a r)
179
1~
lee
1~
198
1"
288
210
2m
FIGURE 4.4
Q versus'S' Onset
(rev.To/g)
,_ r-------------------------------------,
..
..
.
..
..
40
38
35.6
27.1
18.1
211
,Q
8.5
178
17S
198
1SS
198
195
2IiI8
28:S
211J
Page
10~
Where
73869 + 000299<yp)2
Correlation <r)
SO of errors
= 11 39
=
=
y
yp
<4.3)
0982
Figure
4.5
depicts
the
<Bar)
relationship
between
the
from
the
dependence
on
temperature,
which can
and 4.3,
can
be
above
both
analysis
filler
there
content
be accounted
for
is
and
strong
processing
in expression 4.2
and
combined
to
predict
head
pressure.
curves
shown
in
figure
4.3
to
single
mathematical
relat ionship.
4.1.3 ENOOTHERMIC ENERGY OF PEAK 'A'
The area of a
can
be
converted
to
energy
value
by
UPVC thermogram
the relationship
for
peaks 'A'
and 'B'
these values
profiles chosen.
<4.4)
'B'
= 'B'
= O 4592
Page 105
FIGURE 4.5
Pnolysis of Heod pressure
r----------------------------------,
... r... -
",.
,
Data
_._. Gradient=1
..
...;
,
,..
,
.(.
.r'
., .;
,~
...
".,. .
.,.
,
"
... -
..
,,' .
,.'
..
I
50
lea
158
28Q:
lOO
at
profiles
A &
S,
and the
onset
increase
diminish
in
AH~
temperature of
can
be
seen
begins
185'C
from
to
peak
area
temperature.
above
increases
The rate of
an
approximate
the
error
bar
<standard
deviation
It
of
points
fit
single curve
then
the effect
of
filler
Page 106
FIGURE 4.6
Master Fusion Curve
Energy (Jjg)
14
I-
12 IIl-
la
l-
'/
, .
.-...
'A'
/,
l-
. .
. ....
/
8 '-
.~,,,
.
:....
.
.
'-
". ,"
6 -
.
.
.
.
. . ..'
..
.-. .- .
,/
lll2 I-
.
..
.
:
~
.' .
(
1713
I
175
.,/.
'.
..
I
180
'8'
.,
I
185
r
1910
..
I
195 2130 2135 210
Page 107
increasing
t.H~
manner to
'B'
onset
temperature
and
in
similar
curve:
t.HB
(4.5)
SO of errors
The
content
202 C,
t rend
and
the
= 0'149
again
value
although
the
shows
no
decreases
ability
dependence
to
to
zero
at
measure
filler
approximately
the
upon
at
t.HB
high
of
3F.
level
t.HA
from the
experimental
from
which
value
taken as an
other
t.HA
values
provided
by
pipe
be
compared
as
profile,
4.2
onset
(' B'
then
similar
trends
are
noted
to
figure
which
filled
window.
the
is,
of
t.H~
depicting
extrudate with a
can
fusion
The graph
figure
level of
be characterised
by a
course,
and
similar
can
fusion.
be
curve
for
wide processing
in appearance
used
to
label
to
a
attributes:
% Fusion = -1080,09
(4. 6)
SO of errors
= 506
Page 108
FIGURE 4.7
Master Fusion Curve
% Fusion
1213.----------------------------------------,
11313
813
613
413
213
13L---L.J...LLU..l.J...J...LLU..l..l..LUL.l..l..l..l..LULU..l.J...LLLLl...LJ...l..l.l..L1__- l
1713 175 1813 185 1513 195 21313 2135 2113
Page 109
extrudates incorporating a
via thermal analysis.
Pipe
code
l>Hs
"HA
Predicted
fusion
(J Ig)
(J Ig)
fusion
OEOEA
OEB
OEC
OED
OEE
OEF
OEG
OEH
1887
1890
1880
186'0
1875
1853
186'8
190'8
1920
527
556
581
583
5'46
6' 19
738
6'45
869
l' 19
028
052
120
O 19
037
O 18
O' 19
020
486
51' 5
539
54 1
505
577
69'3
602
82'1
569
576
550
496
537
477
51' 7
623
65'4
3E3EA
3EB
3EC
3ED
3EE
3EF
3EG
3EH
1908
189 8
1930
192'7
189'0
190'7
190'0
190'8
1957
750
624
9'43
7 12
8 11
6'94
6'60
529
8'44
0'45
l' 14
O' 17
0'32'
048
0'38
0'34
050
0'22
70'4
58'1
892
66'8
76'4
650
61' 7
48'9
797
623
59'7
67'9
67'1
57'6
620
60'2
62'3
74'4
Figure
graph;
4.8
presents
the
'B'
onset
do
exceptions that
not
reveal
any
as
bar
data
large
with
the
for the zero series and 3EH yields a slightly higher result.
It may not be acceptable to directly compare the two sets of
data
since
(3. 2. 3).
the
extrusion
conditions
are
not
identical
Page 110
accurately
controls
the
bUild-up
temperature
for
the
different compositions.
The second figure (4.9) demonstrates that the degree
of
fusion
differs
between
additive
the
equation given
the
blends
for
be accounted for
measured
for
'B'
onset
since
the
then
the
by an alternative
variation
this
type/amount
in
'B'
value
and
onset
%
of additive has a
temperature
and
using
slight
types
peak.
(equation
to some extent,
temperature
and
significant
the
4.8).
for the
comparison
indicates
fusion
in
that
the
were
taken
extrusion;
parallel
transverse
to
the
direction
of
direction of
sections
and
The sections
sampling.
can
be
The results of
summarised
into
the
the
large number of
following
relevant
points:
The extrudates containing a relatively low level of
filler
(0
st ruct ure;
&
8 5
phr)
distinct
residual
may be attributed
additives
grain
revealed
and
since
to the
additives
The speckled
dispersion of particulate
are
not
dispersed
within
Page 111
FIGURE 4.B
'B' Onsel for Additive blend.
'S' Onset (cC)
200r----------------------------,
1','10 phr
1!!m27 phr
195
190
185
180
BeD
Additive code
FIGURE 4.9
% Fusion for Additive blends
fusion (r.)
100r----------------------------,
90
80
70
60
50
40
A BeD
G H
Additive code
Page 112
A dark
field
illuminated
background
was
used
for
the first
ext rudat es
that
processed
at
lA.
the
Figure 4.11
residual
profile
ls
grain
was
far
a section of OB
content
lower
of
extrudates
than
extrudates
for
the 8.5
profile
phr filler
temperatures).
representative of pipes;
OB-C and
The inclusions
The
and
(especially at
micrograph
of
OB
is
complete
destruction
of
the
grains
but
progressive
Figure 4.12
illustrates the
'streaking'
IF.
It
of
the
is difficult
original
grains
since
size
distribution
is
be
suggested
from
the
large
number
of
~m
micrographs
observed.
Page 113
Fusion and
FIGURE 4. 10:
Microscopy/~
Microphotograph of section OA
Dark Field
Illumination
380 flm
1----------1
Section
11
The
second
series
of
figures
~.
temperature
dispersed
blends
sections
(e. g ..
figure
residual
grains.
<If
A,
(18' 1 phr);
&
Higher
intermediate
agglomeration
can
finally
distinct
quite
be
of
residual
grains
dispersion
seen
(section
areas
of
are
higher
profile
unlike
the
D,
where
2D
detected
& F
result
traces
of
in figure
of
and
shown
patches.
and
in
filler
4.14)
agglomeration as
temperatures
then
well
profile temperatures
stages
the
the low
indicate
which,
4.13)
depict
13-4. 15
in
Thus
yielded
Page
11~
FIGURE 4. 11:
I Dark
Field
1 Illumination
1
11
--=~~-~~--I
I
III
FIGURE 4. 12:
Section
Microphotograph of section OE
Dark Field
Illumination
380
~m
1----------1
11 Section
Page 115
FIGURE
-----~-------------
~-----
Dark Field
Illumination
380 )-lm
1----------1
....
11 Section
L--_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~_~ _ _ _
further
increase
in
filler
loading
results
in
in
the
micrographs,
however
the
extrudates
dominant
(27,1,
3S'6 and 40
is
evident
at
low temperature
feature
profiles
(A &
4. 17)
and
finally
very
poor
B)
as
however
phr)
Some degree of
for
(C & D
dispersion
is
dispersion of
filler
produces
agglomerates
of
as
dark
voids
grain content
where
high
is not
residual
filler
as
grains
content
in
significant
micrograph
Resi dual
were detected),
which
4. 18.
prevents
or
is
masked
identification
by
the
in
the
field of view.
Page 116
FIGURE 4. 14:
Micro~hotogra~h
of section 20
Dark Field
Illumination
380 flm
1----------1
. !-.
11 Section
~'"
~'-4
....."..
FIGURE 4.15:
Ill'
...
J'
...".
..
Microphotogra~h
of section 2E
I
I
Dark Field
Illumination
380 flm
1----------1
1 Section
Page 117
FIGURE 4.16:
Microphotograph of section 5A
Dark Field
Illumination
380 I-'m
1----------1
FIGURE 4.17:
Section
Microphotograph of section 5e
Dark Field
Illumination
380 I-'m
1----------1
Section
Page 118
FIGURE 4.18:
Microphotograph of section 5F
".
., .
Dark Field
...
Illumination
380 flm
1----------1
1 Section
the
UV
fluorescence
technique
described
in
2.8.
Here
the
illustrates
4-.19
the
presence
extrusion
t emperat ures.
inferences gained
however
the
The
level
temperatures
1F,
does
of
not
technique
field
easy
few
highly
processed at relatively
fluorescence
allow
of
complement s
the
microscopy
sections,
at
extrusion
lower
identification
of
the
filler
4-.20
illustrates
technique
for
fluoresces
and
thus
highly
section
filled
enables
the
dark
field
microscopy
the
using
the
UV
extrudate,
5A.
presence
and
as
an
Page 119
Fusion and
FIGURE
~.
19:
Microscopy/~
Microphotograph of section 1F
Fluorescence
150 fJ.m
1----------1
1 Section
FIGURE 4.20:
Microphotograph of section 5A
Fluorescence
150 fJ.m
1----------1
" Section
Page 120
Fusion and
Microscopy/~
The
swelling
of
PVC
in
acet one,
shearing
bet ween
simple
to
provide
In this
project,
small
micrographs
4.23
and
provide
convenient
samples
taken
of
examples
of
the
test
the
is
pipes
sheared
of
the
applied
were
fragments.
results
for
assessed
Figures
all
the
blends
produced.
and
under
acetone
down
to
between
cohesion
the
primary
the
shearing
test
were
and
4.21filled
profiles A
easily
broken
particles.
strength
and
Figure
can
be
4.21
demonstrates
considered
to
this
represent
poor
all
FIGURE 4.21:
Acetone shearing of OA
Dark Field
Illumination
380 I-'m
1----------1
Page 121
Fusion and
Higher
particulate
profile
temperatures,
breakdown
and
the
and
micrograph,
Microscopy/~
0,
resisted
figure
4.22,
degree of cohesion;
with a
last
filled
beyond D,
microphotograph,
blends
1. e.
processed
E and F;
figure
at
the
4.23,
represents
profile
temperatures
significantly
greater
which
results
in
fibrillar
tearing
to
the
technique
quickly
qualitative method
assess
does not
does
the
provide
quality
quantify
of
useful
fusion,
the extent
of
the
fusion
the
degree
of
fusion.
Thus
the
t est
does not
provide
amounts
of
complementary
filler
are
evidence
added,
to
the
but
it
thermal
does
provide
data
analysis
surface
(2. 7)
of
and
the
pipe
was
the
results,
viewed
in
via
electron
general,
provide
surface.
The
electron
technique
to
thus
pipes
the
surface
observe
can
quality.
micrographs
the
be
Table
detail
easily
4.3
of
provide
the
grouped
lists
the
convenient
outer surface
according
to
pipes
terms
in
and
their
of
'.
Page 122
Fusion and
FIGURE 4.22:
----
----
M1croscopy/~
Acetone shearing of OD
----
Dark Field
Illumination
380 )lm
1----------1
FIGURE 4.23:
Acetone shearing of OF
Dark Field
Illumination
380 )lm
1----------1
Page 123
TABLE 4.3
Il
GROUP
III
5A,B
5C-E
4C-E
3A-D
2A-C
4A,B
IV
VI
3F
2E
lE
IF
IA,B
3E
2D
IC
OA, B
OC
OE
5F
2F
4F
OD
OF
ID
t
Where I
FIGURE 4.24:
Micro-surface of pipe 48
28 J.1m
1----------1
Group I
-------- -------
-----
--
.-
-------
Page 124
FIGURE 4.25:
Micro-surface of pipe 4E
28 J-lm
1----------1
Group 11
FIGURE 4.26:
Micro-surface of pipe 3C
28 J-lm
1----------1
Group III
Page 125
FIGURE 4.27:
Micro-surface of Eipe 3E
28 ).Im
1----------1
Group IV
FIGURE 4.28:
Micro-surface of pipe lE
------- ------
28 ).Im
1----------1
Group V
Page 126
FIGURE 4.29:
Micro-surface of pipe OF
o
o
""
28 flm
1----------1
=
o
o
Group VI
o
o
o
o 0
An
increase
in
filler
content
not
only leads to a
in
amount
deposited
of
63.3. 1
but
also
filler
leads
on the
to
an
surface.
increase
the
These deposits
in
detected
figures
Page 127
FIGURE 4.30:
Micro-surface of pipe 1F
28 Ilm
1----------1
Calcium map
FIGURE 4.31:
28 Ilm
1----------1
Calcium map
Page 128
FIGURE 4.32:
Micro-surface of pipe 5F
28 )lm
1----------1
Calcium map
The
blends
cont aining
the
range
of
addi t i ves
The
micrographs
significant
differences
additive series;
manner
to
the
the
and
an
these
between
the
unfilled
extrudate
of
filled
series
and
OA"OF
yielded
unfilled
similar
revealed
order
extrudates
of
decreasing
residual
additive incorporated
grain
cont ent
can
be
presented as follows:
POOR
OEG
OEF'
OE-
OEC
OEA
OED
OEE
GOOD
OEH
Page 129
Fusion and
M1croscopy/~
no subt le
differences
in residual
were
observed
OEG
4.33
being
series.
shows
clearly
Extrudates
high
distribution of
t he
worst
OEB
and
of
all
OEF
residual
ext rudat es
show
in
marked
an
Pipes
almost
inclusions
extrudate
OEC,
in
OED
and
homogenous
than
terms
of
its
OEE
are
section;
similar
homogeneity
very
OEE
similar
reveals
slightly
counterparts.
was
OEH;
few
and
The
best
inclusions
dispersed to
yield a
homogeneous section.
FIGURE 4.33:
Dark Field
Illumination
380
~m
1----------1
1 Section
----------~-
--
----.-
Page 130
Fusion and
FIGURE
~.3~:
Microscopy/~
Dark Field
Illumination
380 flm
1----------1
1 Section
-------
FIGURE 4.35:
--------
I
Dark Field
Illumination
380 flm
1----------1
1 Section
Page 131
FIGURE 4.36:
Dark Field
Illumination
380 ",m
1----------1
" Section
FIGURE 4.37:
Dark Field
Illumination
380 ).1m
1----------1
1 Section
Page 132
Polcarb
distribution
filler
was
differed
not
in
that
prominent
residual
feature.
grain
here
the
of
of
the
additive.
increasing
filler
filler
The
was
series
dispersion.
section
which
affected
can
be
from a
(20-30
does
by
the
ranked in
poor
~m)
not
type
and
terms
of
distribution
in
can be seen to a
indicate
filler
3E-
3EC
3EB
3ED
FIGURE 4.38:
3EF
GOOD
3EH
3EG
Micro~hotogra~h
of section 3EA
Dark Field
Illumination
380 ~m
1----------1
11 Section
-_____J
Page 133
FIGURE 4.39:
-------..........---- ---- - -
Dark Field
Illumination
380 /lm
1----------1
1 Section
FIGURE 4.40:
Dark Field
Illumination
380 /lm
1----------1
" Section
Page 134
FIGURE 4.41:
Dark Field
Illumination
380 f.Lm
1----------1
11 Section
FIGURE 4.42:
Dark Field
Illumination
380 f.Lm
1----------1
11 Section
----~-----
--
-~--
Page 135
Fusion and
Microscopy/~
In this case,
not
identify
discriminating
poorly
power
extrudates
were
pipes
were
extruded at
gross
changes
indeed,
the
of
of
in
between
acetone
fusion
level
and
the
test
was
equal
profile
not
shearing
test
did
The original
that
(E)
limited
all
the
level.
The
and
be
the test
the
fusion
might
therefore
expected
not
and,
distinguish
series processed at
test.
and
suggested
level
range
shearing
test
the same
fusion
solvent
t emperat ure
the
specimens
approximately
fused
that is,
However
at least,
unable
to
the
extrudates
moderately fused
provide
further
for
the
(table 4.2)
evidence
to
visual
increasing
examinat ion
surface
1. e.
table
quality
3.5.
was
The
same
suggested
order
by
of
the
Page 136
CHAPTER FIVE
S,
were
subject
described in 2. 10. 1.
did
not
produce
to
uniaxial
pipes
testing
as
regular
pipe
section
tensile
processed
at
which
prevented
extruder
profiles
D,
C,
and
F.
can
measure
of
particularly
does
5.1
and
5.2
the
of
was
consider
failure
not
the
quite
and
where
However
the
fusion
of
tensile properties;
high,
values
evident.
trends
influence
in general,
is
break
always
loading
that,
(s. d)
at
number of
filler
results
scatter
elongation
identify
infl uence
from
experimental
failure
the
yield and
seen
for
reproducible
test
be
level.
Figures
filler content
a
upon
steady decrease in
deviation
filler
between
loadings
i. e.
profile
temperatures
extrudates
at
containing
the
35'6
higher
phr
of
influence
of
filler
loading
ultimate
content,
stress
is
observed
with
upon
failure
again a decrease
increasing
filler
temperature
profiles.
Profiles C
and
produce similar
aB
temperature
values.
processing
It
was
t emperat ure
leads
to
observed
in
det ermined
reduction
64. 1
by
that
thermal
in
ultimate
the estimated
analysis
for
Page 137
Properties/S
TABLE 5. 1
Tensile properties of filled extrudates
Pipe
code
Yield
stress
ay
s.dt
Ultimate
stress
(MN/m' )
s.d
aB
OC
OD
OE
OF
52'1
51' 8
52'7
523
0'7
03
02
0'4
41' 2
41' 9
40'3
38'6
lC
ID
lE
IF
488
47'1
468
482
1'0
05
0'4
0'3
41 2
4!-7
38'5
362
2C
2D
2E
2F
433
44'1
435
438
3C
3D
3E
3F
(MN/m')
Yield
elongation
Ult imate
elongation
(%)
(%)
Ey
s.d
lOB
05
0'4
07
0'4
10 7
10'0
11'0
170
05
0'0
0'8
0'8
90
124
114
61
21
4
24
23
1 4
06
09
0'4
108
11' 7
143
150
08
05
05
00
128
135
133
67
7
4
7
12
0'3
0'1
03
0'2
402 1 6
40' 1 2'0
37'3 08
360 02
10'0
11'0
16'0
150
0'0
00
0'8
I' 3
121
140
136
60
8
6
6
4
423
41' 4
398
37'5
05
l' 2
0'2
0'8
37' I
36'3
34'3
336
0'6
1 2
O' 1
02
4'7
40
107
133
0'9
00
0'9
05
41
29
33
27
4
1
4
2
4C
4D
4E
4F
373
375
36'4
35'0
09
l' 2
06
l' 0
350
34'7
34'7
32'4
02
09
0'1
02
103
8'7
8'0
103
l' 2
05
0'0
0'5
20
26
15
23
3
4
3
3
5C
5D
5E
5F
35'7
37'4
37'1
35'0
10
02
05
0'2
345
35'1
348
330
07
0'4
03
03
10'0
9'0
103
93
0'0
0'8
05
09
26
29
23
14
3
15
3
0
t s. d
s.d
Page 138
Properties/5
FIGURE 5.1
Yield stress versus Filler content
Stress (MN/m2)
W,----------------------------,
55 -
45 -
40---- F profile
....... E profile
_._. D profile
- - C profile
35f--
~~I--~I--_~I~I--~I~
10
20
30
Filler content (phr)
40
FIGURE 5.2
Ultimate stress versus Filler content
Stress (MN(m2)
~,----------------------------,
.... -._,_.
40 -
35f-
..... .
---- F profile
....... E profile
_._. D profile
- - C profile
~~I--_~I~I--_~I~I~
10
20
30
40
Page 139
Properties/5
increase
in
profiles D
measured
approximate
values
processing
if
and
(Jy
can
was
be
measured
replotted
temperature
shown in figures
obtained
temperature
between
The
as
processing
were
(JB
(' B'
onset
Similar
plotted
against
the
temperature)
figures would
against
fusion
be
level
which
filler
are
dependant
loading
results
in
substantially
lower
than
however
yield
val ues
the
upon
a
filler
loading;
series
the
of
higher
which
filler
const ant,
data
preceding
remain
loading,
albei t
at
onset temperature
filler
loading
produces
observed
for
filled
and
decrease
the
in
data
extrudates
beyond
an
collected
and
increase in
yi eld st ress.
the
results
35'6
the
of
5C
(0
and
At
onset
'B'
Little difference
upon
is
40
symbol)
is
phr
seem
unreliable.
The second figure
are
for
temperatures,
observed
not
the
and
between
filled grades
a
increase in B'
an
onset
although,
unlike
temperature for
all
The results
especially
loadings,
as
precise as
testing of
this
the
fact
(85 and
account
yield stresses,
processed at
for the
extrudates
181 phr).
the
extrudates
may
unfilled
for
and
low
crOSsover
the
lightly
of filler
were
perhaps
temperature
elongation
small
for
the
at
yield
increase
lightly
with
increasing
filled
measurements
for
processing
extrudates;
the
heavily
whereas
filled
Page 140
Properties/5
FIGURE 5.3
Yield stress versus 'B' Onsel
Stress (MN/m2)
~
..
.
r------------------------------------,
.
6.5
..
G
""
t'"
t..
185
198
18.1
27.1
~
1"
28e
35.6
40
....
"0
FIGURE 5.4
Ultimate stress versus '8' Onset
Slress (MN/m2)
.
8.5
18.1
27.1
~35.6
40
S7'!!
lee
Ul5
198
1"
28e
28!5
218
Page 141
Properties/S
Tensile
extension
at
failure
was
dependent
upon
The
scatter
consideration
trends
phr
and
may
observed.
filler
and
processing
of
results
account
values
aB
above
temperature
contrast,
the
extension
value
at
low
extrudates
into
in
the
containing 27 1
independent
at
processing
taken
variation
extrudates
remain
filled
be
some
relatively
and
lightly
for
for
seem
should
low
of
the
value.
In
achieved
temperatures
high
but
this
The
elongation
at
break
measurements
elongation
extrudates
values
(8 5
were
and
mimic
the
trends
is interesting to note
higher
18 1
for
phr)
at
the
lightly
intermediate
FIGURE 5.5
Ye"'''''
Ullimale elongation
.
,..
'B' Onsel
Elongation (%)
..
.
.
8.5
18.1
1~
"le
185
198
195
____
288
27.1
4()
__
2SS
__
__
__
____
__
~~----_
~
....
_.-:.
:..:::.-:<:::::::..~' 35.6
~
"
28
..
218
Page 142
Properties/5
phr)
pipes containing
summary
of
results
is presented
tensile
in
table
5.2:
TABLE 5.2
Tensile properties of additive series
Pipe
code
Yield
stress
Ultimate
stress
(MN/m' )
ay s. dt
Ultimate
elongation
Yield
elongation
(MN/m' )
aB
s. d
(%)
10
(%)
s. d
lOB
s. d
OEOEA
OEB
OEC
OED
OEE
OEF
OEG
OEH
534
518
522
539
547
544
53'8
42'4
49'3
03
0'5
0'9
0'5
0'9
0'4
0'6
0'5
0'7
469
44' 4
43 0
42 1
41'7
441
42'7
44 5
515
2'4
l' 9
l' 8
l' 2
1'0
2'0
07
l' 7
2'1
60
48
58
100
8'0
80
9'0
100
100
0'0
08
04
00
0'0
00
1'0
0'0
0'0
165
179
157
158
83
169
148
191
206
18
14
9
22
3E3EA
3EB
3EC
3ED
3EE
3EF
3EG
3EH
45 4
45'3
449
44 4
44'8
447
447
429
41 1
O' 4
0'3
0'4
1 0
O' 4
0'9
0'9
0'5
O' 8
415
41'0
443
42'1
40'5
39'9
422
47'9
45'5
19
08
12
08
0'7
13
23
1'4
2'1
100
117
103
11'1
9'2
97
9'0
110
100
0'0
07
13
18
10
07
1'0
00
00
154
148
180
149
122
145
162
194
196
9
9
12
7
18
10
16
12
7
12
18
8
17
has
little
of
impact
effect
modi fier
yield stress
is
modifier
the extent
and
lowered ?y
the
upon
of
yield
properties with
addi t ion.
In
this
the
incorporation of
the
reduction
material
is
filled.
depends
Case
an
the
the
impact
upon the
Properties/5
(additive
reduces
code
G)
yield
(additive
filled
in
an
while
stress
code
H)
has
system the
unfilled
the
all
moderate
roles
system
significantly
acrylic
modifier
lowering effect.
are reversed
in
that
In
the
the
acrylic
5.7
ultimate
and
ultimate
drawing,
tensile
are
depicted
stress
is
indicate
observed
i. e.
large
dependence
upon
the
by
break
amount
in general,
results
properties
of
The
type
and
will
be
discussed
fully
in
6. 3. 2.1
when
The
determined
impact
via
of
propert ies
an
instrumented
the
extrudates
falling
impact
were
tester
as
extrudates
produced
at
the
lowest
temperature
however for
were supported and clamped onto a DIN ring anvil and tested
using
pipe.
the
same
test
variables
as
described for
the
split
thickness
runs
and
in
the
results
individual
results
Differences
in
disproportionate
of
the
order
were
by
pipe
to
provide
the
even
test
dividing
the
of
thickness
between
comparable
by
thickness
results
slightly
, normalised'
specimen
impact
varied
the
specimen.
can
produce
after
normalising,
Page 144
Properties/5
FIGURE 5.6
Yield stress fo r Additive se ries
Stress
(~N/m2)
Wr----------------------------,
1,"""10 phr
1i55l27 phr
55
,
50
;~
45
.'
40
35
A
Additive code
FIGURE 5.7
Ultimate stress tor Additive series
Stress (~N/m2)
55r----------------------------,
50
45
40
35
8
Additive code
Page 145
Properties/5
normalised
strain
rate
tests
is
the
application
of
filters.
testing
fitted
with
signal
with
filtering
figures
of
brittle
digital
number
shown
in
filter
of
brittle
materials.
The
which
available
material
Appendix
spikes,
be
The
is
the
effect
illustrated
Figure
E.
tester
post-filter
filters.
can
especially
impact
can
results
in
of
the
effectively
E. 1
analyse
and
complicated
opposing case of
by
signal
extreme filtering,
artefacts.
figure
In
the
E.2 illustrates
the same impact data of E.l but with a high powered filter.
Over-filtering can lead
the
eliminates
application of
the spikes of a
an
intermediate filter
for
the
sensible
application
of
The criterion
a
filter
which
E.3,
is
A series of
post-filter value.
The
salient
fract ure
as
shown
in
The
results
indicate
strong
the
force,
general
deflection
gradient
(maximum
trends
and
are
similar
energies.
value
of
The
slope
in
interrelationship
impact
for
fracture;
the
exception
a
that
measures
is
of
maximum
force-deformation
trace)
which
remains
series
(C=F)
loading.
relatively insensitive
within
pipe
Page 146
Properties/5
TABLE 5.3
Pipe
code
Peak
Peak
Force Deflection
(N/mm)
(mm)
Peak
Energy
(J Imm)
Failure
Deflection
(mm)
Failure
Energy
(J Imm)
Er
Type
of
Failure
s_dt
OA
OB
OC
OD
OE
OF
OG
24-0
165
1223
124.6
1192
1261
1216
3-4-1
2-5414--00
15-07
14--68
14--90
14--35
0-40-2
6-3
9-6
8-6
9-9
8-6
7-51
5-62
15-4-0
16-4-1
20-31
20-6419-83
0-7
0-49-0
10-5
11-0
12-5
10-9
0-40- 1
0-5
1- 1
0-7
0-7
0-5
lA
lB
lC
ID
lE
IF
964822
1263
134-3
1258
1293
7-51
6-65
12-90
14--66
14- - 19
15-4-6
3- 1
2-3
8-3
9-5
8-7
10-4-
8-88
7-75
14--4-0
15-78
15-4-8
17-89
3-6
2-6
8-9
10 - 1
9-412 - 1
1- 5
1- 2
1- 2
1- 0
0-8
0-7
2A
2B
2C
2D
2E
2F
174117
219
295
262
1034-
2-4-7
1- 946-36
5-98
7- 17
11 -84-
0-2
0-1
0-9
1-0
1- 2
5-8
8-28
7-69
10-98
7-70
10- 13
13-05
0-7
0-6
1- 5
1- 2
1- 6
6-3
0-1
0-1
0-3
0-3
0-2
0-7
3A
3B
3C
3D
3E
3F
103
66
185
256
180
198
1 -91
1- 62
5-07
4--99
4--4-3
5-39
0- 1 .
0-1
0-8
0-9
0-6
0-7
9-65
7-85
9-548-68
7-18
7-75
0-6
0-5
1- 2
1 -40-9
1- 0
0-3
0- 1
02
0-2
0- 1
0-2
4-A
4-B
4-C
4D
4E
4F
9491
184191
194180
2-242-39
4--20
5-21
6-50
5-71
0- 1
0- 1
0-5
0-7
1- 1
0-8
8-69
10- 31
9-647-71
7-76
8-03
0-7
0-8
1- 2
1- 0
1- 1
1- 1
0-2
0-3
0-2
0-2
0-2
0- 1
5A
5B
5C
5D
5E
5F
91
89
203
178
212
184-
2'4-42-33
6-22
5-85
5 - 15
6- 15
0- 1
0- 1
1-0
0-6
0-8
0-9
11-11
8-348-4-2
8-12
778
-9-00
0-8
0-5
1- 3
1- 1
1- 2
1- 2
0-3
0- 1
0-2
0-4
0- 1
0-3
Maximum
Gradient
(KNmm/m)
123
114
116
119
113
130
142
123
125
B
B
BID
BID
D
D
D
BID
BID
BID
BID
BID
D
B
B
126
108
131
116
204
211
158
137
B
B
B
BID
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
150
149
168
166
B
B
B
B
B
B
167
166
198
155
B
B
B
B
= Ductile
Page 147
Propert1es/5
the differing
impact
might be expected.
the
maximum
because
of
provide
gradient
the
some variation
for
small
the
flat
deflection
sufficient
number
hot
at
of
pressed
peak,
pOints
specimens
which
for
the
did
not
automatic
calculation of slope.
It
is
also
characteristics
plaques
split
di fferent
flat
obtained
(profiles
pipe
A &
impact
between
the
can
to
two
deformation
are considered.
seem
values for
The
the
for
flat
than
the
by
the
deforming
pipe.
However
reasonably
techniques,
impact
lower
when
hemispherical
sampling
of
accounted
invol ved
characteristics
peak
testing
be
behaviour
compared
failure
the
the
are considerably
This
deformat ion
that
from
B)
specimens.
specimen
failure
evident
especially
for
the
comparable
if
results obtained
profiles
the
pipes
A and
however it
values
impact
are
possible
related
specimen
to
geometry
brittle
or
performance
factor
transition is observed 1. e.
is suggested that
since
rather
these
than
brittle-ductile
ductile/brittle
to
ductile
on
from
increasing
processing temperature.
Since
analysis
energy
of
can
f iller
the
results
the
force-deformation
be
used
loading
performance.
indicated
and
represent
processing
similar
trends
traces,
the
then
relationships
condi t ions
and
for
the
failure
between
impact
and
type of test;
to
indicate
can
a
extrudates which
be
considered
quite
acceptable
in a
for
this
is observed for
main
figure
5.8,
three different
modes
of
fracture:
ductile,
brittle/ductile
and
brittle.
Page 148
Praperties/5
FIGURE 5.B
Typical failure mechanisms
Force (N)
,~
r-------------------------------------,
,-
OB: BritiJe
---- oc:
...
,...
BrittJe/Ductile
....
...
...
...
Brittle
running a
1~
19
20
Defannation (mm)
fracture
is
visually
observed
as
crack
crack
running
'capped'
at
in
the
direction
in
approximat e
size
of
may
be
extrusion
of
the
Brittle/ductile
circular
sect ions
of
the
pipe
impactor
probe
failure
is
and
can
be
considerably
generally characterised
Page 149
Properties/5
drawn
yield area.
Therefore a
puncture hole of
similar
force
signal,
due
to
further
penetration of
the
be
seen
in
filler
figure
5.9;
the
impact
higher
higher
impact
profiles
general
values
the
profile
resistance.
and
trend
than
temperature,
are
in
that
moderat ely
and
A
Profile F
processed
low
profile
profile B.
in
The values
very
produces a
obtained for
are
extruder
reversed
to
nominally
D
(C,
and
the
higher
from
wi t h
E)
general,
is clearly distinct
At
is
yields
ext rudat es
energy.
performance
resistance.
Profile F at
an
unfilled grade.
Figure
levels
for
level
the
extrudates
A similar
(4.1).
presents
5. 10
graph
failure
axis
was
replaced
temperature
(' B'
onset
via
implied
would
be
by
energy
thermal
observed
the
versus
al.o
analysis
the
if
estimated
temperature)
fusion
fusion
processing
derived
from
thermal analysis.
If
the
highly
considered first;
filled
extrudates
dramatic
most
containing
increase in
fused
(~27'
extrudates
member;
impact
the
specimens failing in a
18'1
effect
phr)
are
upon the
of
filler
until
improvement
is
dramatic
with
a
the
the
a brittle mode.
Page 150
Properties/S
FIGURE 5.9
Failure ene".lY versus Filler canlent
Foilure energy (J/mm)
.e
..
.L.....-J--=-..J.....--J"-......I._....L._..L..._J...........J._-1..--.J
10
1!5
28
15
3Q
FIGURE 5.10
Failure energy versus Fusion level
Foilure energy (J/mm)
B
.6 BID
12
8.5
,.
20
.. .
Fusion level
(r.)
.ee
.20
Page 1Sl
Properties/5
The
unfilled
and
lightly
filled
extrudates
<0
and
'high'
impact,
ductile
The
characteristics
lightly
fused
with
increasing
fusion
level.
series
(extrudates
impact,
processed
at
extrudates
of
A and
indicate
B)
these
two
poor
It is interesting to
extruder profile;
while
fusion levels for these two extrudates are also reversed and
thus
might
fusion
account
levels
for
the impact
result
values
obtained.
considerably
in
Higher
impact
higher
filled
indicating
obtain
the
the
level
the
of
(8.5
requirement
same
resistance
sharp
series
transition
increases
until
levelling
off
o
at
shifted
higher
after
approximate
failure
actual
to
decrease
is
is
right
level
The
passing
fusion
mode
the
fusion
performance.
series,
phr
ductile
or
of
is
impact
of
an
phr)
the
to
impact
through
level
reached
observed.
of
20%,
where
The
a
a
last
in
profile
impact
temperatures
degradation
equipment;
(' B'
energy.
due
to
OG
is
(2.6.1)
hot
spots
pipe
which
extruded
has
within
at
high
traces
the
of
processing
onset
temperature
and
201. 2'C)
impact
testing
impact
testing
of
the
filled
extrudate
pipes
and
the
transition
from
poor
to
maximum
Page 152
Properties/5
influence
of
environmental
temperature
upon
processed
at
extruder
profile
temperature
F
the
impact
impact
characteristics
energy
an
be
although
performance,
show
again
can
increase
with
used
to
deflection
increasing
test
levels.
Figure
5.11
the
dependence
of
fusion
impact
FIGURE 5.11
Failure energy versus Tes! temperature
BID
D.
-20
Test temperature
(oC)
...
Page 153
ProperUes/5
by
test
temperature
of
80C
35 5 and 40 0 phr,
temperature
and
until
conditioning
respectively,
100C
are
where
the
broad brittle-ductile
Although
100C.
ductile
fracture
is
obtained,
the
moderately
filled
brittle-ductile
transition
is
increase
in
again
2F,
beginning
produces
at
and
10C
substantially
test
pipe,
higher
t emperat ure
than
did
not
3F
and
improve
further
t he
energy
value.
The
similar
unfilled
failure
and
energies
lightly
with
filled
the
onset
pipes
produced
of
narrower
for OF and
finally
The
better
temperature
low
ending in ductile
properties
lF versus
failure at
of
lF
are
20C.
probably
OF
(c.
f.
88'7%
versus
71' 7%)
and
the
consequences
of
The
val ues
the
obtained
for
impact
energy are
qui t e high
but
the
influence
transitions,
with
indicates
increasing
of
test
temperature
temperature
and
off
of
impact
suggests
that
Page 154
Properties/5
pipes
containing
the
range
of
additives
were
Pipe
code
Peak
Deflection
Peak
Force
(mm)
(N/mm)
Failure
Deflection
Peak
Energy
(mm)
(J Imm)
Failure
Energy
Maximum
Gradient
(J Imm)
(KNmm/m)
EF
OEOEA
OEB
OEC
OED
OEE
OEF
OEG
OEH
1124
1067
929
1094
1211
1175
1052
1108
1279
12'05
1264
1157
14 48
15 21
1504
12 56
16'11
1674
3E3EA
3EB
3EC
3ED
3EE
3EF
3EG
3EH
848
615
1064
915
676
753
1062
1079
1065
10'47
853
13'36
11' 28
9' 13
9'80
13' 14
15 17
14 57
BID
6' 1
62
48
78
9'2
8'8
6' 1
8'6
10'8
3'9
23
4'6
28
33
6'3
7'5
7'0
s.dt
13'29
1453
1339
2217
21'33
22'24
14'26
21' 47
21' 20
67
69
53
102
11'4
11'2
6'7
10'3
12'4
1'3
07
06
06
0'8
0'4
1'3
0'5
0'7
124
117
107
BID
BID
BID
115
116
118
D
D
D
118
D
D
11' 76
4'4
2'7
7'3
0'6
0'2
07
5'1
O' 5
3'2
3'7
7'0
83
77
0'4
07
0'6
0'4
1'0
100
99
100
104
99
103
104
102
102
BID
BID
BID
BID
BID
BID
BID
BID
BID
9'76
1465
1253
10'46
11' 05
14'44
16'94
15'84
6'6
Type
of
Failure
BID
111
98
= Brittle/Ductile.
t s. d
= Sample
The
figure
D = Ductile
standard deviation
values
5.12;
it
for
failure
should
be
energy
noted
are
that
illustrated
the
in
extrusion
(2. 6. 2)
and
It
differences
thus
comparisons
is evident
can
be
from
obtained
in
should
the
bar graph
impact
be
made
that
properties
in the case of
Page 155
Properties/5
same
lubricant
(2.3).
In fact
two fold
increase can be
Possible explanations
fusion
level
and
microscopy
results
are
presented
(6. 3. 2. 2>'
Figure 5.12
Foilure energy for Additive series
14r-----------------------------,
12
':
.,
10
'l
':
8
6
2
0
C
D E
Additive code
Page 156
CHAPTER SIX
DISCUSSION OF RESUL TS
6. 1 INTRODUCTION
The
preceding
chapt ers,
3-5
inclusive,
the
subsequent
tests
as
series
of
have
extrusion
brief
discrete
sections.
in detail
interactions.
In order
chapter
pipes
will
is
divided
processed
be
subtle
to simplify
into
over
considered.
differences
three
wide
following
parts;
range
Secondly
in
the
the
formulation
discussion,
firstly
of
the
ext rusion
extrudates
for
an
filled
condi t ions
incorporating
unfilled
the
and
Lastly the
dry
until
blending
the
time
addition
of
unaffected
high
loadings
by
of
filler
filler
loadings
longer
blending
times
were
loading
<original
At these high
observed
which
mixer
material
fouling;
available
filler
to
loss,
generate
in
effect,
frictional
reduces
heating
the
between
the particles and the high speed rotor and also between the
particles
themselves.
Thus
longer
time
was
required
to
Page 157
DiscussioniS
The
filler
resultant
loss
is
also
shown
which shows a
significant
variation
actual
content
original
for
between
filler
expected
contents
and
of 40
filler
and 50 phr.
In
blending,
even
though
the
dry
blending operation
was
(2.4).
adhesion
filler
filler
is
is not
since
involved
preferentially
to
m'/g)
(70
m'/g)
(1
filler
It
(3. 1. 1. 3).
area of
grain
of
of
unlikely
surface,
at
the
polymer
is
the
located
surface
directly to that
it
at
the
the
of
that
filler
polymer
the polymer
monolayer
is shown
folds,
and
of
to
be
only
appear
saturate
to
possibly
produce
adheres
to
the
polymer
filler
filler
surface
either
the
unassociated
High
a
loadings
of
the
layer
grain
pOlymer
filler
surface
or
Since
fine
particles.
of
(blends
forces
&
grains
tendency of
mixer
fouling by
and
which
weakly
yields
'free'
powders
are
5)
"free'
or
then
easily removed
the
mineral
filler
adheres
to
the
polymer
surface
the
folds
of
the
irregular
shaped
polymer
grains
using
temperatures,
illustrated
filler
micrographs
grain
which
Hancock
blending
indicated
the
this suggestion,
to
and similar
as
surface
in
similar
is shown to adhere
manner
to other
solid,
Page 158
Discussion/6
The
level
of
adhesion
is
probably
related
to
the
micrographs
introduction of filler,
8' 5 phr,
1. e.
illustrate
also
particularly at
that
the
with
diamet er
can
compared.
report
(42],
filler.
be
A slight
observed
decrease
if
micrographs
3. 3 and
3. 5
are
spherical
shaped
grains
and
slightly
lower
average
particle size.
Bulk
increasing
obtain
density
blend
maximum
values
temperature
values
blending (136,177],
generally
increase
with
(137,139,168,176-177,180]
after
relatively
short
and
periods
of
large extent
on the
In this study,
content
<figure 3.1).
expected
due
to
gravity
material
efficiently 1. e.
filled
grades
increases.
the
incorporation
of
particles
which
and
upon increases in
& 5)
higher
can
be
specific
pack
more
yielded
disproportionate
high
tap
density
values
as
seen in
the
bar
graph of figure 3. 1.
The implications of the dry blending results suggest
that
in
order
representative
powder
to
of
produce
the
characteristics,
filled
original
then
dry
blends
formulation
the
filler
and
which
are
have. good
should
ideally
Page 159
Discussion/6
adhere
to
the
large
polymer grains.
The
problem of
filler
out
after
each
batch
and
thus
steady
state
whereas
composition,
bulk
1. e.
density can
Ash
provide a
quick check
used for
upon
quality
be monitored,
1. e.
The
presents
problems
many
when
extrusion
to a
full
down
product ion
proven
in
for
twin
attempting
screw
to
or even attempt
from a
useful
machines,
of
characteristics
model
mass throughput,
complexity
Krauss Maffei
use
predicting
in
'The
extruders
relate
results
to predict the
laboratory machine
KMDL-25 is a
the
laboratory
extrusion
behaviour
scaled
and
on
has
larger
introduction
of
substantial
amounts
extruder
filler
high
[177],
poor
segregation [42]
extruder
torque
powder
flow
[177].
of
i.e.
properties
filler
surging
[168,177],
densities leading to
These
problems
were
Page 160
Discussion/6
filled
blends
blends
(3,4
containing more
& 5)
than
properties
During the
runs
minimalised
the
hopper
by
these
the
poor
these
dry-flow
experimental
exhibited
problems
fitting
of
horizontal
controlled
or
multi-pronged agitator
characterist ics to a
were
the
dryblend to aid
to
flow
(2. 6. 1).
to prevent
throughput
Mass
It
that
speed
is
generally
reported
an increase in output
[131,141,142, 179l
for
twin
screw extruders
and
higher
bulk
densities
138,138,154,177l.
However
since
the
screw
constant
machine starve
fed,
then
was
and
the
controlled
by
the
rate
and
was dependant
the
extruder
ext ruder
constant,
densi t y.
table
D.2)
processing
was
kept
the output
rate
the
material
was
temperature
(2. 6.
(high bulk
profiles
induced
1).
was kept
D:
which
ove.rloading of
at
speed
[136-
which
were
also
conditions
for
mass
independent
indicating
throughput
of
the
the
(Appendix
wide
positive
array
of
conveying
'Melt' temperature
Processing temperature was
a
thermocouple
indirect
situated
method
relationship
was
of
in
the
thermal
observed
die
head
analysis
between
the
and secondly
(1. 4. 2.5).
two
methods
the
linear
(figure
Page 161
Discussion/6
the
however,
to
inability
accurately
the
calibrate
to
the
thermocouple
reading
calibration.
estimated
thermal
high
Therefore it
processing
analysis produced a
analysis
or
low
measurements,
depending
1. e.
upon
day's
temperature
via
the
thermal
temperature and
was
shown
that
'B'
onset
temperature
increased
in fact a
increase
in
'B'
onset
temperature.
Profiles
which
in
die
head
temperature
onset
temperatures
did
indicates
the
effective
not
increase
'B'
processing
temperature
infl uence
t emperat ure
increase
in
profiles
(C
was
almost
value
at
,with
D)
&
temperature profiles
suggested
extruder
that
set
difference
of
the
filler
negligible
unfilled
the
blend
and
'B'
temperature
even
was
figure
onset
at
A slight
temperature
higher
or
temperatures
between
extruder
effect
processing
4.2).
(figure
intermediate
little
upon
addition
extruded
4.4
lower
4.1. 1
at
lower
illustrated
temperatures
for
the
this
when
significant
amounts
of
[131,181)
and
controllers (Appendix D:
accurate
table D.
this type of
proportional
conical
temperature
1).
Extrusion pressures
The
twin
screw
extruder
was
fitted
with
pressure
beginning of
three
discharge zone
Page 162
Discussion/6
(Pl>,
could not
These transducers
results.
Extrusion pressures at P1 were only measured in such
where
cases
present
high
adaptor
head
by high die
resistances
temperature profiles
(A & B)
were
also
induced
by low extrusion
indicating
the
resistance.
these
conditions
(numbers of
the
effect
pressures
table D. 3).
(Appendix D:
obtained
and
response
was
high
increased
chambers
position
of
of
full
the
the
filler
length
content
of
the 'gel
column'
and
thus
[131, 142J.
Although
under
certain
it
possible
predict
within
extruder.
Covas
the
[131J
position
conducted
of
an
melting
to
measurable
conditions a
to
die
transducer
obtained
upon
extensive
was not
the
processing
However
his
study
used
flood
feeding
P 1 indicat ing a
In this study,
always
is questionable whether
the
obtained at
melting
and thus it
P1
mechanism
position for
all
the
composition
range
would
blends
chosen.
have
under
full
and
occurred
with
Therefore
the
increasing melt
extrusion
pressure
P1
barrel
pressures
of
temperatures)
viscosity
the
bUild-up
are
screw
and
and
it
is
same
usually
the
(increases
content).
reported
becomes measurable in
transducer
increases
(increasing filler
generally
the
decreasing
section
in
in
with
Low
the
feed
suggested
that
last
third of
Page 163
Discussion/6
Adaptor/inlet
blends
is
pressure
illustrated
in
response
figure
6.1
for
the
filled
3.2.2).
(from
The
upon
[ 14-2 J
the
extruder
evaluated
suggested
rate,
that
the
KMDL-25
adapt or
of
geometry
temperature
pressure
flow
in
rheological
concluded
at
that
temperature,
melt
the
constant
and
control
it
the
is
in the barrel
adaptor
transducer
properties
increase
of
in
head
flow geometry
suggested
to
material
content
ratio
filler,
and
out put
die,
out put
in
'genuine'
throughput
the pipe
that
the
(3.2).
provides
rate
die
was
temperature
Therefore the
the
point
He
adaptor
indicate
that
such as
upon
constant
indicate
at
tool
the material.
and
filler
and
In this study,
dependant
output
seems
the
was
pressure would
also
Stephenson
processing
properties of
viscosity differences.
constant,
the
constant
adaptor
remained
as
profile.
rheological
[131,1421.
roughly
An
linear
5,
has
linear
provide a
point
for
and
without
sampling
material
thermal
temperature at
analysis
is
not
possible
inlet /adaptor
pressure
could
not
be
plott ed
that
thus
against
t emperat ure.
The last
and resultant
filler
Head
content
and
pressure
extruder
increased
with
head
temperature
filler
profile
content
and
temperature as might
upon
(3. 2. 2).
decreased
be expected.
head
processing
filler
which
pressure
temperature
content.
clearly
response
(measured
mathematical
shows
due
that
the
by
to
the
thermal
components
analysis)
relationship
two
components
was
of
and
obtained
control
the
Page 164
Discussion/6
FIGURE 6.1
Inlet pressure Ye"'U' Filler conlen!
Inlet pressure (8ar)
...
...
c
o
E
F
,oo
.~
______
,.
______
______
..
________
Filler ""
content (phr)
"'"
~--J
FIGURE 6.2
Analysis of Head pressure
Head Pressure (8ar)
~
r----------------------------------,
..., Data
.... -
_._. Gradient=1
.' .
..
.
-- .
... "
,
. . , ..
2110-
,,;.
:~
."
,..
,
,oa r,oo
r-
.., --.
"
.. ~I--~I~I--~I--~I~I~
lee
1~
2ee
2Sl...
Page 165
Discussion/6
straight
line
analysis
relationship
(equations
4.2
composition containing
a
wide
range
of
obtained
and
from
4.3).
the
Thus
regression
for
the
base
0~40
processing
conditions,
the
transducer
of
evaluating
the
('1).
mechanical
work
involved
in
In
this
constant,
case,
where
the
mass
throughput
is
almost
the figures 3.9 and 3.10 which depict torque and '1
Thus it
is intended to
zone,
in
similar
('1)
manner
is dominated by the
to
pressure
build-up,
of
paramet ers;
properties
of
[131]
extent
and
material
remains constant.
upon
the
melting
melting
zone.
extruders
set
[131,142],
of
[142J,
length
back pressure
to
be
rheological
of
'Gel
column'
assuming
that
output
behaviour
concluded
of
[181l
that
the
material
evaluated
Q was
an
two
'measure
of
the
total
within
twin
important
large
Rauwendaal
and
temperat ures
on a
the
screw
process
He considered
deformation
that
the
'1
ex
;:
(6. 1)
Page 166
Discussion/6
Where
shear
stress
dispersive
parameter
also
is
reported
mixing
[186]
in
in
that
be
and
distributive
demonstrated
increase
to
important parameter
shear
mixing
under
specific
an
strain
[187].
certain
energy
is an
important
Rauwendaal
conditions
consumption
in
[181]
large
involved
zone
temperature.
temperature
As
might
(' B'
be
temperature
However
onset
temperature)
Q falls
expected
and
the
the
influence
effect
processing
with
of
of
increasing
filler
is
extrusion
to
produce
1. e.
family
of
curves
with
the
highest
filler
as suggested in 3. 2. 1,
filler
content
differentiate
requiring
and
the
between
temperature
the curves
substantially
less
profiles
with
the
mechanical
energy
for
exceptionally
high values
and
profiles
input.
The
higher
clearly
secondly a
tendency
with
profiles
& B
might
be
1. e.
related
to
long residence
residence
time)
was
increase
noted
in
'Gel
whereby
column' (increase in
response
at
P1
was
Page 167
Discussion/6
obtained.
levelling
The
commensurate
with
poor
off
tendency
dispersion.
appeared
Poor
to
dispersion
be
was
extruder
profile
temperatures
D,
and
(4. 3.1).
the
extrudates
5C
and
5F
respectively
(40
phr);
the
microtoming.
curve
(figure
6.3)
dispersion might
profiles
D,
(equation
upon
be that
E and
6.1)
and
F
the
increased
likelihood
of
poor
reduce
the
substantially
component
of shear
resulting
in
stress
lower
than
FIGURE 6.3
Mechanical energy ve",us Filler contenl
Q
(rf'N.'x.fg)
" r-----------------------------------,
.
.
..
.. +---~
___-<:::::::::s
E
F
28
!-_--......~
I.
~----
__~______~______i _____--+_--J
le
20
38
...
Page 168
Discussion/6
main
features;
unfilled
and
lightly
filled
extrudates
Residual
grains
were
phr of
detected
fill er
in
extrudates
(4. 3. 1);
the
presence
literature
grains
present
were
Residual
[112,116,137,142,170,188-1891.
extrudates
in
at
processed
low
band
(figure
However
4. 11).
when
the
grains
became
highly
elongated
within a
processing
(figure
The
4.12).
dependant
upon
a1
the
processing
observed a
temperature.
Terselius
et
(116)
of
micrographs.
approximately
30%
for
processing
temperature
decreased
to
processing
virtually
shown
obtained
poorly
processed
while
(176C),
t emperat ure
microphotograph
They
negligible
was
in
4.11
value
pipe
the
at
grain
amounts
increased
figure
to
low
content
when
205 C.
reveals a
of
the
The
relatively
(1727C)
the machine
mixing.
mixing
was
Stephenson
dependant
(142)
upon
suggested
leakage
that
flows
and
the
level
of
position
of
Page 169
Discussion/6
OA
and
lA
(!!4-. 3.1>'
pipes
Little
when compared
difference
in
to OB and
processing
higher
via
profile
lower
pressures
B.
supports
type
content
presence
(CDFE)
of
pipes
(A and B),
than
and
with
was
however
shape
appreciably
of
residual
densification,
4-.1>.
(1.
an
extrudates processed
mechanism proposed
machine
[179]
yielded
, compact ion,
the
elongation'
Obande
grain
The
temperature
(3. 2. 2)
residual
profile
this
1B extrudates
Similarly
grains
fusion
by Allsopp
Covas
and
[112]
for
[131]
and
upon
this
st udies
at
mechanism.
Filler dispersion
Extrudates
~18'
containing
phr
did
not
contain
elongated
compositions
ensure
(figure
invoke
almost
4-.14-),
sufficient
complete
the
finished
breakdown
conditions
extrudate
(114-.3.1>.
The
suggests
extruder
which
of
that
the
back pressures
the
grains.
to
However
depending
lightly
upon
filled
the
processing
grade
of
8'5
phr
of
higher
18 1 phr
processing
agglomerates
were
contained agglomerates
quite
were
well
temperatures
approximately
distributed.
characterised
by
temperatures
180'C),
temperatures
high
poor
high
(upto
processing
dispersion
processing
approximately
degree
of
with
t emperat ures
jim
10-20
Higher
at
4.15).
jim
in
filler
These
diameter
loadings
dispersion at
the
and
were
low processing
at
intermediate
temperatures
30-4-0
(figure
deterioration
~190'C)
obtained
of filler
in
()195C).
the
The
highly
produced
diameter
which
exceptionally
filled
blends
agglomerat es
lead
to
at
of
filler
Thus filler
Page 170
Discussion/6
dispersion
general,
is dependent
an
increase
deterioration
high
in
upon
in
the
quality
of
processing temperatures
noted
in
the
discussed
upon
the
discussion
in 6. 2. 2.1.
amount
of
upon
upon
Thus
dispersion.
to
effect
a
of
torque
filler
mechanical
The
in
characteristics
dispersion is
energy
input
and
as
dependent
the
filler
level.
Surface appearance
The aesthetic appearance of the pipe's outer surface
was
assessed
scanning
by
visual
electron
assessments
examination
(4. 3. 3).
microscopy
reveal
similar
(3. 3.1)
results
as
and
Both
shown
also
via
arbitrary
in
table
4.3;
bold text.
viewing
area
differences
apart
(cf.
than
were
visual
noted
examination,
which
were
no
however
more
only
than
one
few
group
is,
high
processing
and
low
quality surface,
temperat ures
and
low
filler
processing
temperatures
produce
poor
reproduce
4.3
(4. 3. 3)
the dimensions
separates
the
of
the
extrudates
into
4 & 5.
poor
surface
finish
t emperat ures
temperatures
surface
(upt 0
was
other
two groups
group
(2
&
'"
3)
surface finish
at
at
195C).
only
qUite
The
(",Group
the
equivalent
III:
lowest
equivalent
table
main
2 & 3
processing
highest
("'2040
quality
even
three
i.e. 0 & 1,
Table
to
4.3).
of the
the
ext ruder
pipes but
worst
The next
processing temperature
of
the
filler
had
blends
Page 171
Discussion/6
at
their
maximum
moderately
produced
Lastly
filled
pipe
the
yielded
temperatures
group
blends
of
temperatures,
higher
lightly
acceptable
finish
OD,OE,ID
temperatures
VI)
produced
containing
(2E,2F
filled
at
and
while
the
extrusion temperatures
appearance
and
(i. e.
(Group
at
acceptable
unfilled
an
extrusion
processing
IF)
a
and
3F).
(0
& 1)
blend
lower
and
at
separate
extrudates
processing
the
highest
classification
having
good
signs
of
melt
nor
surface.
amount
of
the
micrographs
evidence
of
exhibited
filler
agglomeration
on
the
filler
4.30-4.32),
particles
on
the
pipe
surface
(figures
agglomerat es.
The
examined
inner
(3. 3. 2)
surface
finish
and,
this
in
those
extrudates
of
the
case,
pipes
less
was
also
discrimination
containing
substantial
amounts
Table
(0. 173-197"0
which
is
extrusion
is
probably related
reduced
by
the
processing at
wide
of
(0.193-
to molecular
introduction
of
low temperatures
relaxation
filler
and/or
thus maintaining
as discussed in
1.
4. 2,
by
Common
testing
techniques
and
more
include
recently
capillary
thermal
(1.
rheometry,
analysis.
The
4. 2. 4) relies on the
Page 172
DiscussionIS
However
effect
of
upon
the
the
extrudates
which
the
is
elastic
entrance
carbonate filler
for
technique
fillers
illustrates
higher
, standard
resul tant
formulation/processing
introduction
the
more
reported
to
response
[ 124J .
pressure
contain
[190J;
[113,124-125, 179J
results
increasing
filled
for
amounts
the entrance
highly
have
and
the
diluting
Figure
a
6.4
series
of
pressure is
of
calcium
initially
compositions due
to
the
levelling
increasing
off
filler
pressure response
with
content
and
higher
appears
therefore
filler
to
reduces
contents.
mask
the
Thus
elastic
the discriminating
FIGURE 6.4
Enl:rance pressure versus '8' Onset
Entrance
pressure
Davenport Rheometer
1400C : 20mm/min
{]
.oo
1&4
1Q:Q
Increasing filler
content
t 92
~,
Page 173
Discussion/6
of
(3.4),
fusion
acetone
included
swelling
the
test
methylene
(4.3.2)
chloride
and
test
differential
methylene
chloride
test
provided
quality
result.
All the
exception
of
those
extrusion temperatures,
excessive
swelling,
pipes
processed
profiles A & B,
(1.
at
e.
the
lowest
"<180C) where
delamination
was
observed.
Thermal analysis
The application of
technique
for
the measure
thermal
of
analysis as
fusion
has
potential
been discussed
in
is
redrawn
features
are
in
figure
similar
in
6.5
(figure
appearance
and
2.3:
2. 9. 2).
location
to
The
other
An
the
endothermic
glass
baseline
transition
shift
corresponding
temperature
(TG )
of
to
the
mat eria!.
b)
c)
The onset
of
indicator of
the 'B'
endotherm provides a
good
(6. 2. 2.1>.
Page 174.
Discussion/6
FIGURE 6.5
DSC The nnogrom of 1C
Signal
EXO
U
~
ENDO
eo
,eo
1-48
148
\Ge
Temperature (oC)
129
2..
""0
:HO
FIGURE 6.6
DSC Thenn"9roms
Signal
EXO
Polymer
ENDO
.. .
,ee
128
148
168
\98
...
228
Temperolure (cC)
Page 175
Discussion/6
d)
'B'
endotherm
crystallites
of
representing
various
perfection [128].
figure
6.6
endotherm
shifts
the
virgin
progressively
a
of
melting
of
and
degrees
of
for
to
melting
sizes
the
higher
low
polymer
decreases
in
this
size
and
to
the
crystallites
and
temperature
temperature
and
due
e)
broad
endotherm
processing
'A'
peak
temperatures
develops
at
attributed
low
to
the
6.6
upon
illustrates the
these
features
for
is
also
noticed
exhibits
measured
(4. 1:
even
for
the
broad
at
low
Table
4.
and
increasing
processing
dist inct i ve
at
few
5 phr).
(028
of
Jig)
the
which
for
t emperat ures,
6H A
1. e.
'B'
The
temperat ures
but
wi t h
peak
at
is
higher
disappears
becomes
[116]
in
this
more
study
4-.6).
Although the
difficult
allowed
to
concluded
in
values
thermal
analysis
to determine and
because
of
excessive
and
value of
measure,
the
identification
and
figure
increasing
thermograms
measurement
<IF:
is
'" 1 70C
progressi vely
temperature.
processing
members
A value
increases
processing
A negligible 6H A
polymer
endotherm.
processing
1),
low
(8'
virgin
'B'
influence of
Terselius
study that
et 81
the
'B'
The
thermal
et
the major
a1
[182]
peaks;
the endothermic
it
provided a
was
different
concluded
peaks depended
upon
that
the
interpretation of
the development
of
particulate nature
Page 176
Discussion/6
and'S',
peaks
were
and
to
as
related
to
the
were
structure,
nei t her
referred
if
the
the
or'S'
'A'
gelation
was
was observed.
not
peak,
'S' ,
was
observed;
of
endotherm was
while
'S'
onset
temperature
associated
with
interpretation
similar
high
measured
yields
processing
No
development
important
of
well
these
is
peaks
structure.
The area of
from the
'A'
220'C>,
to
terms
'B'
of
until
at
for
peak
peak
This
24-5C>.
value
(ca.
offered
this
an endothermic
developed
this
above
baseline
(ca.
in
In
energy
temperatures
the
peak
the existence
of
project,
molecular
a
number
or
or
.of
to
explanation
of
crystallinity
the onset
large
then
then a single
& 'S'.
'A'
by drawing
grain
compounded
processing
decomposition
proportions
disappears.
to
the
In t he case of compounded
'A'
post-gelation
PVC
6.6
and
destruction
blend
PVC
the
and thus it
st ruct ure.
virgin
is not
polymer,
albeit
broad
and ill
defined,
This
peak
is
related
to
the melting of
primary
filler
did not
the
filler
interaction
level
(191).
(53)
which
However
the
affect
the main
TG seemed unaffected
suggests
little
introduction
molecular
of
filler
and'S'
Page 177
Discussion/6
Master
fusion
curves
are shown
in
figures
4.6
normalised
extrudates,
6.7
and
6.8.
It
can
an
be
seen
inert
the level of
level
curves
which
introduction of
affect
fusion
fusion.
these
filler
Any slight
1.
all
3.
the
from
mineral
describe
and
content
graphs
did
that
not
the
appear
to
increases in fusion
(table
4.1)
were also
from
the
approximately
best
fit
temperature of 207Cj
curve
the polynomial
an
approximate
range
levels
of
values.
data
of
fusion
fusion,
The
points
levels
1. e.
fusion
A
for
processing
curve.
OA
curves
were
obtained
043 Jig
comprised
according
to
et 81 [114],
the
from
(1'4%),
of
very
to
discrete
extruder
Thus a
low
high 6H"
groups
of
profilelhead
further
the
convenient
application
and
of
apparently
thermal
analysis
accurate
method
composition
was
significantly
to
even when
altered
by
the
yield
Acetone
information
of
the
network.
The
(4. 3. 2)
according
temperatures
content
in
test
and
a
but
level
of
similar
provides
the
the
appeared
(1.
cohesion
divided
to
test
shearin~
to
manner
within
extrudates
original
be
to
qualitative
the
polymer
into
groups
extruder
independent
thermal
of
profile
filler
analysis.
Page 178
DiscussioniS
FIGURE 6,7
Mo.ter Fusion CUfYe:- Energy
Energy (Jig)
,.
'2
,.
,"
'A'
,,.. ,...
198
195
IN
1"
lB'!.
'B' Onset temperature \oC)
2'.
28!5
FIGURE 6,8
Master Fusion Curve:- % Fusion
10 Fusion
,a
..
.
.
..
a
,,. ,...
lee
185
198
19!!II
28S
2'.
Page 179
Discussion/6
assessment
6.8).
and
those
Extrudates
revealed
processed
at
microscopy
indicat ed
easy
very
of
poor
agglomerates
extruder
(figure
approximately
acetone
30-65%
shearing
acetone
of
the
primary
tast
and
(figure
swelled
network
yielded
(figure
or
in
part icle
at
moderate
fusion
level
of
breakdown
during
the
resisted
specimens
resulting
processed
indicated
and
analysis
part icles
Pipes
4.21>.
temperatures
profiles
the
to
thermal
cohesion
fragmentation
by
the
Lastly
4.22).
group
)65% fusion,
resisted
breakdown
fibrillar
4.23).
produced a
and
ligaments
under
sufficient
between
large
did not
an
approximate
(table 4.1>.
of
and
10C
difference
resulted
in
(figure
agglomerates
(E and F),
shear
in
temperature
poorly fused
analysis
low
processing
temperatures
190C),
primary
which
development
of
the
network
chloride test.
offers
'A'
peak
[116,131];
secondary
at
little
resistance
to
the
methylene
similarly
crystallites
well
defined.
At
the
highest
(6H B )
is
Page 180
Discussion/6
tensile
properties of
the unfilled
and
filled
seen
from
this
table
that
elongation
at
yield
(Ey)
6.9
illustrates
yield
remains
cry
is dependent
(cry)
At
stress
versus
fusion
independent
of
fusion
level
(upto 18 1
the
with
level
of
increasing
filler.
fusion
At
higher
level;
the
loadings,
cry
reduction is
decreases
concurrent
processing
resulted
in
analogous
filler
temperat ures
large
to
filler
larger
(4. 3.
agglomerates
particle
Poor
1).
size
(4. 3.
dispersion
1)
filler;
which
is
increasing
changes. in
workers
fusion
level
as
The
[75,131,151, 153l.
suggested
negligible
by
number
response
to
of
the
than
the
spacing
of
entanglement
couplings
[131,151l.
The influence of
illustrated in
with
figure
increasing
resulting
1n
filler content
6.10;
volume
dilution
fraction
decrease
reduction is almost
a
in
on yield stress is
effect
(similar
yield
to
stress
is observed
figure
[52,53l.
5.
1)
The
Page 181
Discussion/6
the
filler.
Nielsen [192]
stress-strain
properties
of
filled
polymers;
the
filler
to
the
polymer
matrix
and
alternatively
the
the
no
adhesion
case
the
predicted
relative
tensile
(jREL
Where
(jREL
Figure 6. 10
that
follow a
not
illustrates
similar
accurately
value for
relationship [52].
predict
the
actual
and
does
since
the
is unlikely to
preceding
parameters
were
section
insensitive
to
suggested
the
level
that
yield
of fusion
while
of
the
however,
test
specimen to neck
and
then cold
(aB)
draw.
while
at
break
(e: B)
can be seen if
high
scatter
degree
of
was
observed
for
these
and
(5.1>.
aB
post-yield
Page 182
DiscussionIS
FIGURE 6.9
Yield stres. versus Fusion level
..
..
Stress (MN/m2)
..
..
o phr
8.5 phr
18.1 phr
35.5 phr
40 phr
.a
7e
fusion level
sa
er. J
ge
100
118
FIGURE 6.10
Yield stress versus Volume fraction
Relative tensile yield
---.......
_._.
--
I."
Profile
Profile
Profile
Profile
0
F
C
e.'
....
..,.
....
.... ....
No adhesion
8.t8
8.28
'.30
Page 183
Discussion/6
number
of
occurrence
previous
related
reports
to
tensile
specimen,
characteristics.
would
instability
It
gave
&
test
to
rate,
and
its
geometrical
poor
that
reproducibility
neck
in
the
values
for
OB'
strain
appear
raise
[151,194--197)
and
figures
divides
5.4- and
the
according
similar
tensile
to
the
trends
5.5.
ext rudat es
exhibited
responses.
The
low
are
The
into
of
low
val ues
observed
influence of
response
level
OB
two
filler.
values
might
be
when
compared
filler
content
groups
The
and
(DTA
of
highly
filled
similarly
relat ed
to
data
low
OB
dil ut ion
effect
being
replaced
by
consequence of
also
reported
an
inert
particulate
poor dispersion
the
reduction
(4-. 3. 1).
of
filler
increasing
filler
levels
of
relationship
filler
between
reveal
and
OB
Chauffoureaux [53]
with
OB
and/or
OB
of data incorporating
similar
filler
values
levels
and
is
the
not
as
figure
fusion
level
suggests
6.11
that
is more difficult
decreases
OB
to
with
levels
observed
1.
5. 3.
feature
true
Covas
by
(cf.
figure 5.5).
various
workers
However
since
then
is
it
influence of
(131)
neck
perhaps
fusion
conducted
[67,108,131)
as
instability
was
inappropriate
level.
Terselius
tensile
tests
been
discussed
a
in
prevalent
to consider
the
et a1 [151)
and
above
and
(e)
To,
provides a
Page 184
DiscussionIS
FIGURE 6.11
Ultimate stre"" versus Fusion level
Stre!:S (MN/m2)
r---------------------------------------,
.
27.3
,.
se
6.Q
7e
100
He
impact
interrelation
numerous
performance
with
reports
fusion
(1. 5. 3).
of
UPVC
level
has
However
ext rudat es
been
and
its
examined
in
meaningful
comparisons
the
method
unnotched,
holder,
an
of
test
testing,
temperature,
specimen thickness,
instrumented
(2. 10.2);
1. e.
falling
type
of
test,
notched
specimen preparation,
filtering etc.
weight
impact
or
specimen
In this project,
tester
was
used
2. 10. 2 and 5. 3.
Page 185
Discussion/6
visual
(figure
energy
fracture
produced
5.3).
the
Brittle
resulted
with
similar
in
failure
fracture
peak
instrumented
tester
and
characteristics
low force.
over
ductile
but
fract ure
produce
energy
produced
an
as
failures
such
short
and
behaviour
in
in
fract ure
force
yield
di fferences
resultant
occurring
Brittle/ductile
deflection gradient
varied
values
periods.
considerable
val ues.
Although
accurate
fracture
the
trace
be
the
extrudates.
summarised
best
method
of
distinguishing
between
the
in figure 6.12
effect
upon
performance
and
is
critically
also
(.
symbol)
brittle/ductile fracture
of very
(a symbol)
(. symbol),
fusion
level
passing through a
Impact
ductile
of
70-75%
(' B'
onset
t emperat ure
"'193-196C).
A further
signi ficant
drop
impact
approximate
location
in
is
energy.
well
supported
maximum
by
and
its
number
of
[179l
observed
ext ruders;
maximum
depended
network,
which,
he
in
maximum
compositions
concl uded
upon
the
turn
that
existence
was
related
in
notched
processed on two
t he
development
of
an
to
the shear
Izod
twin
of
inhomogeneous
regime
Page 186
DiscussionIS
FIGURE 6.12
Failure energy Yersus Fusion level
o phr
B
B/O
~e 8.5 phr
eO
12
I
I
I
I
f'
I
I
I
..
.,.",
~
..
..
..
4~_
..
,ee
!\"
network'
network
optimised
27-4() phr
-~-~::---- -~
;;;::'J"
------.-
refer to an 'interparticulate
Terselius et B1 [150J
entanglement
18.1 phr
theory
produces
which,
maximum
in
the
case
of
performance
an
in
they did
specimens.
whereby
particulate
network
proposed a mechanism
system
could
enhance
with
et B1 [149J
falling
weight
a~
tests;
but
on
press
extrusion
temperature.
It
was
concluded
that
Page 187
Discussion/6
surface
stress
processing
work,
concentrators
temperatures
due
to
melt
resulted
in
fracture
at
high
impact.
In
this
poor
micrographs
surface
(4. 3. 3)
and
roughness
was
thus
neither
melt
fracture
responsible
considered
nor
for
the
It
is
suggested
is
attributed
that
to
impact
the
development
particle
entanglement
with
structure
strength
of
of
the
coherent
behaviour
(4.3.2)
little
cohesive
or
to failure,
also,
grains
may
have
levels
increased
thus
impact
primary
absence
impact
a
the
residual
energies.
strong
The
while
final
strong coherent
of
effect.
Increasing
cohesive strength of
performance,
particles.
produced a
detrimental
fusion
the network
retaining
some
processing regime
and
residual
(T M "'201'C)
primary
particles
leading
to
reduced
network
provides
well
distributed,
discrete
weak
yielding
rubbery
and
voiding
additives;
(cf.
UPVC
figure
1. 2).
modified
It
is
by
also
grains
(4.1),
with
increasing
processing
loss
of
temperature
this temperature
(114. 3. 1).
The
introduction
upon
failure energy
than
27 3
impact
phr
of
filler
(figure 6.12);
00.163
volume
had
filler
dramatic
effect
contents greater
fraction)
exhibited
poor
approximately
10% of
This
level
of
the
maximum
for
the
unfilled
series.
filler,
irrespective
of
filler
particle
size,
had
an
Page 188
DiscussionIS
impact
resistance
poor
resistance
dispersion
of
concentration
propagat ion.
the
of
only
can
be
an unfilled grade.
The
the
and
attributed
the
filler;
loci
5-15% of
offers
to
number
easy
and
crack
level
size
of
initiation
stress
and
crack
consequences
of
the
test
due
to
the
extent
upon
of
the
was
similar
in
behaviour
to
the
phr of
highly
filled
fused
still
member.
considerably
lower
than
for
this
the
pipe
<2F)
brittle/ductile
be
filler.
expected
However
developed
at
detrimental
observed
due
it
high
effect
that
the
would
dilution
appear
extrusion
of
the
to
that
of
dispersion
inert
network
overcomes
concentrators.
of
an
stronger
temperatures
stress
level
effect
It
at
the
was
the
also
highest
filled
series
<4. 3.
which
1)
suggests
that
poor
similar
lightly
manner
to
observed
from
poor
improved
failure
than
unfilled).
failed
the
unfilled
impact
Further
in
ductile
the
unfilled
appears
to
be
shifted
brittle/ductile
low
filler
is
failures
mode.
level s
to
50%
fusion
to
level
higher
more
likely
since
the
fusion
to
values
the
were
curve
levels.
incur
filler
much
of
complete
the
was
resulted
The
brittle or
stiffens
failure
manner
than
the
unfilled
as might
series
the
Indeed
<20% higher
The measured
series
in
transition
fusion
in
behaved
approximately
behaviour until
to
of
at
phr)
pipes;
increases
similar
introduction
series <85
energies at
in improved impact
series
filled
[53],
and
in
the
be expected from
Page 189
Discussion/6
the
incorporation
(' dilution
of
effect').
an
The
inert
85
phr
particulate
series
did
additive
not
show
explained
by
the
high
shift
of
the
curve
to
higher
failure
dispersed
general
small
energy
amount
then
of
the
introduction
mineral
filler
of
well
satisfies
this
cri t erion.
Thus the impact performance of the pipes was seen to
be
highly
dependent
upon
filler
level/dispersion
and
the
level of fusion.
The
considered
influence
(from figure
mode
of
failure
test
temperature
was
also
(5. 3. 1)
6.13
of
The test
5.11).
and
temperature affects
the
Table
6.1
broader
beginning
at
transition
higher
with
test
the onset
of
temperatures.
the
The
transition
most
highly
slight
improvement
in
fa1"lure
characteristics
(18'1
at
The moderately
the
close
O'C
and
involving
range
of
30-40'C
values
polymer
to
decretlse
(t able
F. 1).
slightly
The
due
to
slight ly
the
softening
lower
onset
of
of
the
the
Page 190
Discussion/6
TABLE 6. 1
Brittle-ductile transitions
Filler
level
(phr)
Brittle-ductile
transition
( 'C)
Maximum impact
value
(J Imm)
-10 ... 20
14'
8'5
-20 ... 20
13' 6~ 41 'C
1~
41'C
18' 1
0 ... 60
10
273
20 ... 100
6'
35'6
60 ... >100
N/A
40
80 ... >100
N/A
1~
60'C
1~100'C
FIGURE 6.13
Failure ene'9Y versus Test temperature
BID
eO
B.5 phr
.B
,"e----.--'"
4
18.1 phr
,,
,,,
,,
27.3 phr
-20
28
"8
BB
'BB
Page 191
Discussion/6
Thus
figure
brittle-ductile
increases
and
6. 13
illustrates
transitions.
broadens
the
Filler
transition
the
presence
addition
to
of
generally
ductile
failure,
above
critical
dispersion;
impact
filler
levels
performance
and/or
is
not
cases
improved
of
by
poor
higher
test temperatures.
6.3 DISCUSSION OF ADDITIVE SERIES
The
previous
section
containing a
wide range of
the
of
results
composition
an
filler
unfilled
containing
discussed
and
range
the
levels;
a
of
extrudates
in this section,
filled
phr)
(~27
primary
base
lubricents
and
base
composition
(2.2)
primary
system'
this
lubricant
affects
normal
overall
'lubricant
point
in
mind,
it
should
also
be
noted
that
With
the
necessarily
the
achieve
optimum
system;
better combination or
further
perhaps
The choice
melt fracture,
to suit
machine/die head
no significant
differences
Page 192
DiscussioniS
and
the
ash
dry
content,
blend
characteristics,
remained
insensitive
to
tap
varying
(0-5).
content
of
The
"'27-28
ashing
phr
technique
for
suggested
filler
the
(3).
30 phr
values
differed
slightly
with
variation
in
filler
content.
Thus the dry blending results of these compositions
confirm
the
trends
observed
for
the
original
series;
no
content
agrees
filler
levels
level
blending
(6.2.1>.
behaviour
size/design
well
of
to
the
with
expected
and
tap
density
The
apparent
composition
high
speed
is
values
dependant
insensitivity
can
be
mixer
upto
related
which
upon
of
dry
to
the
ensures
good
times
and
similar
bulk
densities
per
given
filler
loading.
6.3.1.2 PROCESSING CHARACTERISTICS
The processing results for
presented in 3. 2. 3 and,
measured
processing
pressures)
have
say,
pressure
head
values
for
extruder
was
observed
between
extrudates
higher
is
the
blends
that
commensurate
The
good
(torque,
trends,
torque.
(3E-=>3EH)
temperatures.
parameters
considered
processing
modi fied
in general,
similar
Q and
extrudates
extrusion
is,
an
increase
in,
with
an
increase
in
temperature
since
and
control
little
except
of
the
difference
was
that
the
filled
temperature
resulted
in
(4.2)
and
marginally
also the
higher
acrylic
processing
Page 193
Discussion/6
30 phr filler
filled
levels.
series
signi ficant
can
not
be
di fferences
in
compared
mass
directly
out put
and
due
screw
to
design
(3. 2. 3),
The
unfilled
differences
lubricant
first
five
called
processibility
members
results
internal
observed
m. pt.
are
and
indicated
when
the
different
considered
clearly
OE-
base
primary
(OE-=>OED),
OEA
If
the
then
the
the
so-
between
lubricants.
and
dramatic
lubricant.
differentiate
external
between
paraffin wax
low
series
was substituted by a
extrusion
was
in
additive
Little difference
where
the
high
m. pt.
(~95C)
paraffin
wax
These
(~60C).
lubricants
are
lubricant
package
was
more
external
in
nature
phr
(OES),
component
the external
system was
lubrication
enhanced further
efficiency
leading to
of
the
very
low
the
introduction
of
internal
lubricants
(OEC & OED) such as GMS (fatty acid ester of glycerine) and
hydrogenated
increase
in
castor
oil
ext rusion
[19,27, 146J
lead
characterist ics;
the
mechanical
energy
input
proportions of a non-polar,
The
<"'105-110),
next
low
this
is
and
pressures
lubricant
were
might
due
an
to
efficiency.
substitution
final
was
OEF,
significant
compared
polyethylene
type
An
to
high m. pt.
low
significant
introduct ion of
incorporated
external
related
its
sufficiently
The
(OEE)
observed.
be
increase
to
similar
non-compatible lubricant.
concentration
considered
behaviour
being
member
when
to
to
member
where
have
the
which
l' 0
phr
high
wax.
additive,
late
the
this
of
addition
the
level
lubrication
involved
of
torque
for
action
external
m. pt.
Although
high
explanation
and/or
low
st earic
lubricant
acid
was
Page 194
Discussion/6
introduced.
that
of
appear
Q
was
stearic
efficient
low
but
in
not
pressures
containing
low
acid
compatible
phr of
as
head/inlet
1 0
as
low
were
levels
is
terms of
of
as
paraffin
is
not
OEB
while
comparable
predominantly
material
external lubrication,
wax
say,
to.
<OE-
external
as
values
of
ext rudat es
&
OEA).
Thus
but
the
more
efficient
in
reducing
at equivalent proportions.
(OED & OEH) in
the
melt
[146, 201J
viscosities
values
(cf.
modifier
OED
(ACR)
lubricant
OEH
&
and
with
system
system of
thus
respect
resulting
high
and
to OE-),
in
pressure
the
acrylic
substantially
higher
instrumented
twin
screw
extruder
provides
Thus
useful
that
further
experimentation
and it is
would
allow
less
and
do
not
differentiate between
low levels
of
3EE
(3. 2. 3
incorporat e
indicated
by
the
characteristics
(02
and
Appendix D.4).
vast ly different
unfilled
remain
Blends
series,
remarkably
paraffin wax)
3E-,
3ED,
3EC
lubricant systems
and
yet
similar.
the
The
as
extrusion
blend
3EA
and
moderately
stearic
dramatically
"'50%
and
the
acid)
efficient
respectively.
increased
paraffinic
wax
(low m. pt.
external
These
processibility,
appeared
incorporated
lubricant
processed
1. e.
to
paraffin
(low
blends
Q reduced
reduce
to
by
a
Page 195
Discussion/6
great er
than
ext ent
the
stearic
acid
while
extrusion
appears to upset
proportion
of
the lubricant
lubricant
required
external
is
to
achieve
lubricant
has li t t le beneficial
external
lubricant
types
at
low
proportions.
The
increase
as
blend
the
in
(3EG)
filled
modified,
impact
grades
case
of
did
the
not
unfilled
had
higher
slightly
torque
characteristics.
6.3.1.3 EXTRUDATE HOMOGENEITY
unfilled
series,
while
filler
dispersion
varied
residual
grain
structure
for
these
extrudates
processing
throughout
of
the series at
residual
variable.
temperature
grains
must
remained
"185-189C
be
virtually
(4.2),
explained
by
constant
process
characteristics
such
as
Q and
head
pressure
High pressures
versus
the
and mechanical
Page 196
Discussion/6
OEF
OEA _ OE-
OEC _ OED
OEE
OEB
OEF
OEA
OEC
OEE
LOW
A
high
pipe
OED
external
tendency to retain a
t he
OE-
efficiency
while
reduced
ext ernal
lubricant
increasing
(external:
proportion
of
levels
stearic
unfused
efficiency
extrudat e,
observed
has
of
acid)
grains'.
non-compatible
lead
He
to
referred
greater
to
these
but
the
effect
of
intragrain
fusion
was
not
considered.
The influence of
with
respect
to
grain
impact
memory;
CPE
modified
extrudate
series
(figure
whilst
4.33),
the
ACR
modified
was
clearly
series.
The
consequence
modifier.
the
gross
most
homogeneous
extrudate
differences' can
be
produced
of
the
type
of
The
ACR
system
network
should
exist
for
this
considered
by
each
discrete
as
the
well
energy
distributed
through
dispersive
and
other
torque
members
were
of
rubbery
(1.
mechanisms
2. 5. 2).
required
the
particles
to
series),
increase
such
as
then
this
the
blend
extrudate
The CPE
inhomogeneities such as
Page 197
Discussion/6
retention
analogous
to
lubricant
of
grain
external
prevents
memory.
lubrication
This
where
frictional
behaviour
forces
coating
at
is
of
the
the
grain
boundaries.
Filler dispersion
In a similar manner to the earlier extrudate study,
the microscopy of
of
dispersion
was
an
important
feature
the level
and
that
filler
dispersion
agglomerates
homogeneous
of
system with
The order of
varied
greatly
The level
from
distinct
to virtually
improving filler
no
(4. 4.1>.
(3EA _ 3ED)
3EA
3ED
HIGH
GOOD
(3EE
3E-
3EC)
(3EB)
(3EF)
3EC
3E-
3EE
3EB
3EF
LOW
3EE,
Thus
four
groups are
high
dispersion.
amount
of
lubricant
interaction
head
Again
of
pressures
these
external
head
were
results
lubricants;
pressure
ensures that
be
concurrent
can
a
can
be
high
a
wi t h
attributed
level
clearly
of
sufficient
poor
to
the
external
amount
is
Page 198
Discussion/6
blends exhibit good flow properties with low torques and low
pressure build-up.
For
pressure
which
other
vary
is
less,
to
external
level
of
systems,
the
values
of
head
attributed
efficient
moderate
lubricant
poor
dispersion
lubricant.
internal
The
and
low
level
incorporation
lubricant
of
of
a
has some
out the above trends with the notable exception that 3EB and
3EF
are
reversed.
efficiently
possible
This
lubricated
would
in
interaction
is
suggest
the
head
envisaged
that
3EF
is
more
region
than
3EB.
between
the
calcium
the
of
impact
filler
being
modi fiers
well
resul t ed
dispersed
in
(4. 4.1);
for
all
the
series
(figure
the
ACR
significant
modified
increase
in
system
4.42)
and
energy
input
leads
can
be
related
mechanical energy
to
(6. 2. 2.1).
system
analogous
is
unfilled
to
system given
CPE
better
to
input
the
(Q)
the
when
dispersive
action
that
above,
for
that
the
is,
behaviour
the
CPE
of
the
continuous
the
particles
remain
discrete
and
'well
lubricated'
Surface appearance
The aesthetic appearance of the pipes outer surface
was
assessed
by
visual
examination
(3. 3.1)
(4. 4. 3).
and
also
The results of
via
both
Page 199
DiscussionIS
(3.3).
produced
the best
These
surface
observed
during
processing
(4.2)
and/or
fracture,
good
As for
lubricant
pl'ate-out
or
poor
filler
filler
inner
produced
attributed
to
manner
the
to
introduction
better
decrease
earlier
of
the
in melt
extrudate
acrylic
surface
which
elasticity in
series
modifier
may
similar
(6. 2. 2. 2).
also
be
reduces
The
melt
Thermal analYsis
The thermograms for the additive series are similar
in appearance and characteristics to those obtained for the
filler
series
observed [27J.
(figure
6.5),
and
no
effect
TG
upon
was
indicated
by
the
controlled
within
the
di fference
in
'B'
extruder,
lubricant
exception to good
melt
onset
temperature)
even
composition
control
can
is
be seen
though
is
well
wide
considered.
The
Page 200
Discussion/6
AH~
values,
and
predicted
3F:10'53 Jig,
the last
fusion
column of
using
the
table 4.2
measured
estimates
'B'
onset
reasonable agreement
exceptions.
to yield comparative %
The general
few
agreement
the
infers
that
systea
on
1 ubricant S;
This
fusions
suggestion
studies
and
137,200-202J
and
differs
their
previous
interactions
cont ent
lubricant
therefore,
from
all
things
being
equal,
with
in the composi t e
the
However
fusion
is the
to raise melt
external
acting
lubricant
reduces
this,
the
in effect,
magnitude
of
the
rate
of
heat
build-up.
The
ultimate
effect
of
the
calcium
torque [22,38J
stearate
is
reported
to
increase
is
questionable
since:
firstly
the mechanism of
'CDFE'
mechanism
[112-116J;
reported
secondly
the
torque rheometer
in
.twin
this
screw
study
1)
to the
and many
others
(1.
extruder
4.
offers
good
Page 201
DiscussionIS
correct
processing
[131,181)
without
temperature
mainly
by
conduction
input.
Thus it can be seen that for many of the extrudates
the
level
curve at
of
fusion
can
be related
master
to the original
values
plaques
(3-37
J/g)
containing
for
Obande [203)
range
substantial
of
reported similar
compression moulded
differences
in
external
lubricant
to
study
this
temperatures
which
("'190C),
()200C)
indicated
although
at
higher
'B'
onset
that
higher
external
lubricant
content
unfilled series,
"'50-60%
with
dependence
on
of
secondary
primary
the
in general,
exception
of
had fusion
OEF
and
processing temperature
crystallite
crystallisation
breakdown
(6H A ).
Thus
levels
OEH.
The
controlled
and
the
considering
the
degree
the
of
CDFE
destruction
of
the
grains.
The
high
not
suggested
indicate
by
that
Gale
[137),
pressures/mechanical
elongation
and
the
but
energy
eventual
entities
that
are
are
destruction.
to
as
extrusion
enable
Therefore
of
(6. 3. 1. 3)
'unfused',
insufficient
available
level
grain
although
the level of
ext rusion
pressures
may be explained by
("'82%)
&
3. 2. 3);
these
val ues
the
transfer
and
heat
conduction
leading
to
early
partial
removal
of
boundaries
would
enhance
chain
possibly grain
Page 202.
Discussion/6
boundaries,
This pipe
the
extrusion conditions
were not
harsh
in
however it
(OEH),
(1,
as
predicted
might
results
be
to
0 phr:
blends
external lubricant.
may interact
st earic acid)
but
retained
comparable
containing considerable
lower
pressure
levels
of
calcium stearate,
of
slightly
193 'C
filled
approximately
higher
general,
in
which
60-70%
average
processing
produced
were
fusion
attributed
temperatures
of
to
~190-
(4.2).
extrusion
temperature
observed (3EB,
to
systems,
but
also
processing
conditions,
number
of
anomalies
are
effects,
filler
filler
interact,
and
and
'free'
further
work
is
curve
filled
additive
than
modified
in
similar
series.
expected
system
did
3EG
fusion
not
(10
to
to
the
filler
diluting
ascertain
maj orit y
phr
CPE
modifier)
level
enhance
to
to
manner
calcium stearate
necessary
fusion
lower
allowing
speculation
whether
thus
and
the
also
level
the
of
of
the
had
acrylic
fusion
as
high
extrusion
Page 203
DiscussioniS
predict
fusion
materials.
levels
A number
of
for
range
mismatches
of vastly
were
different
be verified.
acetone
shearing
is,
unable
at
levels
to distinguish
Thus
the
support
thermal
(4. 4. 2)
confirmed
moderate
fusion.
test
of
fusion
between quite
test
provides
analysis
and
the
large
(6.2.2.3),
technique
increments
complementary
the
in 'Y.
evidence
is
to
tests
(3.4) but does not yield any further information other than
that the pipes are not poorly fused.
6.3.2 MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
Yield parameters
The yield properties of the unfilled series appear
relatively independent
of additive type
(6. 2. 3. 1).
stress [59)
The
two
impact
modi fiers
(soft
reduce
CPE phase)
yield
having a
filled
measurements,
additive
albeit
series
is
at
lower
also
insensitive
value,
with
to
the
However,
Page 204
Discussion/6
in
this case,
lower
of
yield
stress
for
3EG
(10
phr
CPE
The
modifier)
is
is
elongation
evident
values
from
are
(8)
table
5.2
that
significantly
the
ultimate
higher
than
the
unfilled.
filled
(3E-~3EH)
The
additive
improved
series
behaviour
compared
to
at
the
values as
failure
for
the
original
~27
phr
!l4. 3.1)
allowing
substantial
drawing
before
4. 4. 1
failure.
elongation
at
break
observed
in
ultimate
elongation
extensions
!l5. 2. 3. 1
(esp.
[57l.
between
(8)
was
modified
blends)
st ress
apparent,
lead
and
(0"8)
i. e.
to
high
high
0"8
measurements.
Therefore
with
any
tensile
certainty,
unless modified by a
and secondly,
the
properties
between
the
did
members
not
of
distinguish,
each
series
introduction of
approximately 27
phr of
instrumented
impact
testing
of
the
pipes
Page 205
Discussion/6
better dispersion,
between members;
impact
performance
of
the
original
unfilled
extrudates
of
1).
fusion,
differences
however
whilst
the
addi t i ve
fusion
apparently constant.
level
(via
in
turn,
extrusion characteristics
indicat es
gross
thermal analysis)
The behaviour of
series
is
can be related
(6. 3.1. 3)
to the measured
OEB
OEF _ OE-
OEB
OEF
A clear
grain
content
link between
1):
OE-
OEA
OEC
OEA
OEC
relationship
and
failure
is
OEE
~
OED
OED
observed
energy.
HIGH
OEE
between
6. 3.1. 3
residual
identified
similarly
(eg.
the
Thus
poor
impact
resistance
and
brittle/ductile
Page 206
Discussion/6
analysis
(4.2)
suggested that,
in general,
and
therefore
the
presence
of
high
fusion
(excluding
levels
of
grain
influence
of
residual
toughness
residual grains)
of
Mai
well
versus a
et
processed
Gale (35J
pipe
B1
upon
(204]
processed
impact
measured the
(low
level
grains
resulted
it
in
(high
low
toughness
of
the
value.
material.
development
(34J
also
of
maximum impact
attributed
performance
with
the
performance.
observed
increasing
levels
Shaw
decrease
of
in
lubricant
et
B1
impact
to
the
of
level
these
Fusion
grains
level,
was
as
related
measured
to
by
the
thermal
of
processing.
analysis,
varied
slightly between the blends and was not associated with high
residual grain content.
The
significant
processed
produced
introduction
increase
pipes
the
<OEB,
best
of
in
impact
performance
OEF,
OE-
propert ies
of
OEA).
all
rubbery
gives
good
additive
impact
(1.
modifiers
2.5.2).
performance
over
the
the
blends;
CPE
compared
<OEH)
since no
the effect
extrudate
to
poorly
secondly,
The
produced
the
of
(OEG)
blends
Page 207
Discussion/6
Optical microscopy
content
ext rudat es
related
of
and
to
this
thus
its
(4. 4.1)
system
t he
energy
is
revealed that
the
worst
observed
impact
absorbing
phase
of
all
behaviour
(1.
the
the
may
2. 5. 2)
be
which
testing
indicated that
of
filled
the
additive
series
also
viable machine
this
case,
relationship
was
observed
between
filler
3EA
3EA
POOR
HIGH
3ED
3EE
3E-
3EC
3EF
3EB
3ED
3EE
3E-
3EC
3EB
3EF
GOOD
performance,
but,
lower
as
might
be expected,
The agglomerat es of
crack
attributed
level
of
filler
dispersion
to
the
and
3EF
lubricant
contain
and
can
relatively
be
seen
high
to
levels
yield
more
of
external
homogeneous
similar
manner
to
the
unfilled
series,
the
homogeneity
lubricants.
and
highly
dependant
fusion
(esp.
upon
the
introduction
of
modifier
resulted
in
good
Page 208
Discussion/6
resul t sand,
impact
ext rudat es
ascert ain
as
discussed
t he
inherent
produced
It
is
difficult
mechanism
of
the
6.3. 1,
in
to
modi fier
discussion
work
to-date
in detail;
has
considered
each
major
reviews
dry
blending
process
and
dry
blend
filler
loss,
times.
The processing characteristics of blends containing
variations
in
appreciably.
filler
Figure
concentration
6.14-
illustrates
mechanism
and
and
final
additives
the
(~85
extrudate
phr)
differed
behaviour
of
an
in terms of the
homogeneity.
Figure
addition
simplistic
of
moderate
approach
densification,
is
to
high
based
levels
upon
of
filler.
Allsopp's
(CDFE)
This
compaction,
mechanism [112J
1. 4. 1)
with
of the grains.
6.14
describes
the
basic
CDFE
mechanism
be
highly
(!l6. 2. 2. 3).
particle
dependant
upon
the
processing
within
the
grain
temperature
retained a
which
primary
was
easily
(!l6. 2.2.3).
The
high
Page 209
Discussion/6
to
produce
(A).
grains
These
addition
to
involved
1. e.
One
efficiency,
then,
in
general,
were
fusion
determining properties
as
observed
then
in
properties
opposing
high
and
temperatures
and
the
and
high
as
of
fusion
If
are
level
are
level
of
lubricating
level
an
of
residual
series
by
few
important
at
grain
role
situation 8
lubricant
impact
conditions
low
characterised
(6. 2. 3. 2).
in
extrudates
had
residual
or
external
filled
level
number
such
few
system
singularly
input
The
inclusions
act ing
temperature,
obtained.
were
moderate
If
with
processing
low
energy
matrix
component s
another.
mechanical
grains
homogeneous
lubricant
in
prevails,
modified extrudates,
reduced due
is
not
to
stress
envisaged
as
controlling influence.
Figure
highly
illustrates
6.15
filled
blends.
the
similar
case
for
fusion
moderate
mechanism
to
is
the
addition
of
an
inert
filler.
The
elongation
and
the level
to
forces,
adequate
dispersi ve
lubrication
and
agglomerat ion
extrusion
low
was
energy
processing
observed
temperatures,
temperatures.
wi th
low
suff icient
blends
While
processed
dispersive
ext ernal
energy
filler
at
high
forces,
interact.
. performance
Impact
was
related
to
filler
demonstrated that
critically
aspects.
be
dependent
formulation
and
processing
highlighted
in
both 'unfilled
and
filled
extrudates;
Page 210
Discussion/6
FIGURE 6. 14
Schematic mechanism of fusion for unfilled or
lightly filled extrudates
ORIGINAL GRAINS
COHPACTION &
DENSIFICATION
Cf.l
:=>
r..
z
<:
'"~
to
E-<
x
0:
<:
E:3
Ui
r..
0
E-<
0
(l
0:
=x
x= =
==
=X
X
0
c:::.
c:::::>
Cl
ELONGATION OF
GRAINS
X=Dc:::=:.Q
X c::::::. 0
Additive
Porosity
Page 211
Discussion/6
FIGURE 6. 15
Schematic mechanism of fusion for highly filled extrudates
ORIGINAL GRAINS
)t
l(
COHPACTION &
DENSIFICATION
X .;,;.,-_ _ot:
Cl)
>-'._._""~.~ ;c:
"
>< .4-
><.
.'
~ )( >r..
>c.
...)(
)( '>('
..
1>1
"'0::"
~
)(
\(
Cl)
It
oX
><
>-
.,.
)<
)<
.>c
E-<
(0
1>1
~
H
Q
'If
ELONGATl'bN OF
GRAINS
Jr
)(
>I
""
z
o
)r
)(
Additive
Porosity
Filler
Page 212
DiscussionIS
which
approach
those
extrudates
containing
filled
blends,
the
traditional
interaction
between
lubricant
instances,
better
(~27
impact
levels of
optimisation
performance
of
for
the
an inert
filler.
formulation
In
induced
it
can be
regime,
(i. e.
modification
level
of
likely
filler
that
each
seen
lubricant
the
of
for
primary
dispersion
system
is
and
given
filler
system must
lubricant)
ease
machine
of
be
level
tailored
to optimise
processing.
specific,
and
It
however
the
is
the
Page 213
CHAPTER SEVEN
7. 1 CONCLUSIONS
Dry blending
filler
Dry
blending
10adings,
increased
filler
time
time.
values
content
constant
loss reduced
filler
blending
remained
Ash
and
the
charge
content
confirmed
at
until,
weight
provided
the
high
and
accurate
resultant
filler
the
Filler
pOlymer
loss in
grains
the mixer
being
completely
Dry
attrition
blending
of
the
of
to coincide with
covered
by
filler
to
slight
f i l l e r particles.
the
original
appeared
filled
polymer
the inherent
blends
lead
to produce
grains
folds in
more
the pericellular
Bulk
densi ty
30 phr
the
value
increased
f i l l e r levels beyond
to 'free'
not
Modification
significantly
to
the
affect
composite
dry
lubricant
blending
system
did
characteristics
or
free
by
flowing properties
the
introduction
filler;
high
10adings
feeding
modification
of
were
filler
of
of
the
the
calcium
prevented
required
to
dry blends
powder
aid
were
carbonate
flow
conveyance
and
in
hoppers.
Page 214
Conclusions/7
the
results
extruder
number
of
general
mass
steady
attained
extruder
The
quickly and
throughput
state
apparently
was
condi tions
unaffected
by
low
extrusion
temperBtures
the
pipe
A & Eo'
could
not
at
be
with
All
the
profiles,
passed
extrudates
exception
& Eo'
of
the
pipe
methylene
chloride
at
processed
test
temperature
processibi1ity
of
different
compositions
including
filler
Pressure
vB1ues
content,
were
measurable
only
in
the
last
decreasing
extrusion
temperature
and
Torque
and Q meBsurements
followed
similar
trend
From
the
extruder
results
of
the
filled
extrudate
upon
Extrusion
characteristics
compositiono'
increase
tr.ansducer
in
Bt
the
torque
the
were
incorporation
and
lJdaptor
of
pressures,
showing
criticBlly dependent
filler
with
an
lead
the
to
an
pressure
approximate
linear
Page 215
Conclusions/7
levelling
loadings at
off
in
torque
high extrusion
values
with
high
filler
to poor
dispersi on.
08'5 phr).
of melt temperature
function
and f i l l e r
content.
some
for
common
lubricants
example paraffin
as external
wax has a
say,
or internal
lubricants;
strong external
lubricating
OMS.
indicated
the
external
extrusion
results
The
behaviour of the composite lubricant system, a high external
nature leading to low t.orque and pressure values.
lead
modifier, . in general,
in extrusion characteristics.
surface
modi f i er
modification
Lubricant
quali ty,
however
improved
surface
the
had
little
incorporation
appearance
in
effect
of
both
an
upon
impact
filled
and
unfilled extrudates.
Page 216
Conclus1ons/7
Microscopy
From
the
microscopy
study
of
the
filled
extrudate
mi croscopy
Optical
the
of
filled
lightly
and
increasing extrusion
distributed
in
flow
band
temperature,.
and
at
high
the grains
processing
The
presence
intrafused
of
final
residual
grains
mechanis~
stage of this
grains,
depended
supports
upon
the
CDFE
elongation
backpressure
and
filled
Moderately
signi ficant
traces
di spersi on
fi 11 er
of
extrudates
residual
was
di d
but
grains,
dependen t
extrusion
tempera t ure,.
high
processing
temperatures
produced
upon
filler
exhi bi t
not
revealed
filler
level
contents
at
poorly
dispersed
that
and
high
filler
the presence of
From the
microscopy at udy
of
the
grain
The
unfilled
memory
characteristics,
function
external
pressures
of
the
which
additive
was
these
external
lubricated
related
extrusion
nature of
system
also
series
to
the
illustrated
head
characteristics
the lubricant.
yielded
low
torque
pressure
being
A highly
and
head
Page 217
Conclusiona/7
highly
the
fusion
assessment
of
the
filled
extrudate
measurements
indicated
that
analysis
Thermal
secondary crystallinity increases with increasing extrusion
temperatures and
that
the amount
of primary crystallinity
'B'
onset
upon
The
the
'B'
onset
setting
temperatures
had
of
temperature
pipe
little
head
effect
strongly
was
temperature;
upon
the
dependent
the
final
barrel
' B'
onset
tempera t ure.
pipe
accurate
head,
however
calibration
as
the
thermocouple situated in
latter
opposed
to
method
the
relied
thermal
upon
analysis
technique.
versus
A
'B'
master
onset
fusion
curve
temperature
it
of
was
secondary
obtained
crystallinity
for
the
filled
Page 218
Conclusionsl7
The
introduction
of
substantial
amounts
of
filler
of fusion
attained by
provides
qualitative
the extrudates.
The
acetone
to
evidence
analysis,
shearing
support
but
the
lacks
test
inferences
discriminating
gained
power
from
for
thermal
more
fused
extrudates.
The
general,
pipes
seem
incorporat ing
to
insensitive
range
changes
of
in
addi t ives,
fusion
level.
in
In
The
thermal
analysis
estimating
fusion
level
relatively
insensitive
processing
condi t ions.
processing
behaviour
technique
from
to
may
fusion
changes
However
appears
curve
in
and
d:i fferences
modification
in
seems
formulation
signi f i can t
require
useful
of
and
:in
the
Mechanical propetties
From
the
tensile
testing
of
the
filled
extrudate
Yield parameters
were
insensitive
to variations in
fusion level.
v'"
Yield
reduction
in
stress
stress
was
dependent
with
upon
increasing
filler
filler
with
Yield
stress
increasing
of highly
processing
filled
temperature
level
a
was
filler.
extrudates
due
level;
decreased
to poor f i l l e r
di spersi on.
Page 219
Conclusionsl7
Post-yield
instabili ty
observed
properties
were
during
cold
drawing.
most
pipe
specimens
for
to
sensitive
Poor
neck
neck
stabili ty
to
leading
was
substantial
scattering of results.
~ High
poor
filler
filler
loadings reduce
dispersion
ul timate
affecting
neck
stress
to
due
stability
and
v-From
the
tensile
testing
of
the
additive
extrudate
post-yield
and
Yield
parameters
were
not
The
stress,
introduction
of
impact
modifiers reduced
yield
The
maximum
fusion
testing
at
levels
intermediate
improved
of
fusion
gave
the
level
poor
levels,
impact
reduces
resistance
at
to
resistance
destruction
mechanisms
extrudates
due
the
suggested a
approximately
At
of
70-75%.
failure
behaviour
performance.
the
absorption
of
ductile
temperatures,
impact
unfilled
while
Low
at
high
particulate
network
of
the particulate
struct ures.
ductile
requiring
high
levels
of
fusion
to
High
10% of
dispersion
strengths of
the
unfilled
Page 220
Conclusions/7
At
high
filler
impBct
lOBdings,
properties
were
ductile
manner
were
considerably
lower
thBn
fBiled in B
for
unfilled
ImpBct
indicated
testing Bt
different
brittle-ductile
increBsed
the
transitions
for
the
brittle-ductile
temperature
Bnd
this
higher
fusion
level
lowered
the
brittle-ductile
trBnsition temperature.
filler
Pipes
with
high
dispersion;
filler
loadings,
brittle-ductile
exhibited
trBnsition
poor
WBS
not
observed.
From
the
impact
testing
of
the
additive
extrudate
The
significl3nt
High
presence
effect
of
residuBl
grBin
levels of residuBl
impBct
performBnce
WBS
the
structure
hBd
unfilled pipes.
linked
to
processing
thus
Bnd
formul B t i on aspec t s.
~The impact
was
Poor
dependent
upon
dispersion
resistance
to
behaviour
the
of
the
qUBlity
of
yielded
impl3ct
was
poor
filled
the
filler
properties;
agBin
related
Bdditive series
to
dispersion.
therefore
processing
the
Bnd
formulBtion aspects.
Page 221
Conclusions/7
Modification
of
the
lubricant
system
can
play
an
Impact
modification
improved
impact
slightly
better
of
resistance,
improvement
the
the
than
filled
CPE
the
extrudates
modifier
ACR
again
producing
modifier
in
this
case.
This
single
investigation
particle
properties.
size
considered
coated
fuller
filler
understanding
the
influence
upon
of
processing
might
be
gained
a
and
by
considering:
a) The influence of the particle size distribution.
b) The influence of coating and coating level.
These
factors
are
presently
under
investigation
at
IPTME.
The
lubricant
composite
performance
study suggested
lubricant
of
package
unfilled
and
upon
the
importance of
the
filled
processing
extrudatesj
the
and
the
work
(4. 1)
indicated
that
thermal
Further
extrude~
It
be identified
from the ext ruder charact erist ics which would ensure a good
quality extrudate.
Page 222
Conclusions/7
The
impact
application
tester
establish
the
of
demonstrated
quality
investigations might
an
instrumented
that
of
this
the
type
falling
of
extrudate;
test
weight
could
further
Page 223
REFERENCES
1.
Anon Euro.
2.
Anon Mod.
3.
Stephenson,
4.
Tester,
5.
Saunders,
Hall
Plast.
Plast.
R C,
0 A,
J.
K J,
l i 1,
(1987)
12. 1, 21 (1987)
Int.,
Plast.
Vinyl Techn.,
5 1,
13-19 (1983)
&- Rubb.
8 4,
137-140 (1983)
Int.,
Chapman
&
(1973)
6.
Viola,
7.
Maltoni,
C,
8.
Burgess,
R H,
Appl.
9.
News.,
P I,
Sc1.
Menges,
Med.
61 174 (1970)
law,
Lefemine,
5,
Environ.
Res.,
Z. 387 (974)
Publ.
(982)
G, 'Berndtsen,
N,
49 597-613
Ch em. ,
(977)
10.
Saechtling,
Verlag,
H J,
Munchen,
Kunststof'f'taschenbuch,
(1974)
11.
ASTMD1755-78
12.
13.
Hoff,
A,
Matthews,
16.
Nass,
G A R,
L I,
York Volume 2
(1977)
Chevassus,
DeBroutelles,
F,
Logan,
MS,
Chung,
Butter-
(1970)
Polyvinyl chloride',
17.
Int., (973)
91-98 (1984)
TM1 BP Chem.
elastomer~
14.
C. Hanser-
R,
Marcel Dekker,
New
C I,
Polym.
Eng.
Sci.,
15,
1110-1116 (1979)
18.
Jacobson,
U,
Brit.
Pl!1st.,
34 328-333 (1961>
Page 224
References
19.
King,
No~l,
L F,
F,
Polym.
Eng.
12 2,
Sei.,
112-119
(972)
20.
Illman,
21.
Souma,
G,
I,
23 71 (1967)
SPE J.,
Conf.
Prog.
Sei.
Eng.
Composi.
4th,
179-186
(982)
22.
Pedersen,
T C,
23.
Hartitz,
24.
Oakes,
25.
Hatt,
26.
Marshall,
27.
Rabinovitch,
E,
B W,
B I,
Eng.
B,
Krzewki,
R J,
B(20) 4,
465-478 (1981)
Guignard,
32.
Gross,
120-124 (1984)
42 8,
70-78 (1969)
Vinyl
3, 98-103 (1984)
29.
31.
5, 392-398 (1974)
E B, Lacatus, E, Summers, J, J.
Sieglaff, C L,
Khanna,
6 3,
P1Bst.,
28.
30.
104-109 (1984)
I I 1132-1134 (1966)
P1Bst.,
Brit.
Sei.,
Vinyl Teehn.,
J.
6 3,
Vinyl Teehn.,
Polym.
Hughes,
V,
Teehn.,
J.
R K,
J,
R C,
Polym.
Eng.
Sei.,
E A,
Collins,
J.
2, 81-85 (1969)
MBerom.
Sei.-Phys.,
P1Bst.
SPE-ANTEC,
1112 (972)
A W M, Hinchen, J D,
Coaker,
SPE-ANTE~
27
425-429 (1969)
33.
Bower,
D,
Heffner,
M H,
J.
Vinyl Teehn.,
3,
116-120
(1983)
34.
Shaw,
L G,
Diluciano,
A R,
J.
Vinyl Teehn.,
5 3,
100-103 (1983)
35.
Gale,
36.
Jones,
G M,
105-107 (974)
RAPRA J.,
D R,
Hawkes,
J C,
TrBns.
J.
P1Bst.
Inst.,
35 12,
773-781 (1967)
37.
Clark,
D,
Woodley,
T,
J.
Vinyl Teehn.,
3,
114-116
(1984)
38.
A J, Boulier,
110-113 (1984)
Yu,
P,
~andhu,
A,
J.
Vinyl Teehn.,
6 3,
Page 225
References
39.
Fredriksen,
40.
Ritchie,
J.
0,
P D,
Appl.
Polym.
'Plasticisers,
Sci.,
13 69-80 (1969)
Iliffe (1972)
41.
Whissen,
R R,
11iffe <1971>
Plastics',
42.
Hancock,
44.
Penn,
M,
PVC Symp.
W 5,
(3rd Ed.)
<1971>
Ferrigno,
T H,
(eds)
Appl.
Sc!.
Publ.
Plastics',
45.
'Current
ology',
43.
Macturk,
H M,
Ph1llips,
I,
Brit.
28 463-467
(955)
46.
McMurrer,
MC,
47.
Fradon,
J,
48.
Gibson,
P R 5,
49.
Wright,
P J,
Patent:
50.
Miller,
W G,
Brit.
51.
Schlumpf,
Plast.
Plast.
Compound.,
Compound.,
I I 1121-1124 (1966)
P1Bst.,
HP,
5 1, 88-96 (1982)
W085/03715,
Plast.,
Bilogan,
W,
(985)
42 99-102 (969)
Kunstst.,
73 5,255-257
(983)
52.
Zolator,
A M,
53.
Chauffoureaux,
Mod.
J C,
P1Bst.,
48 84-88 <1971>
Pure Br Appl.
Ch em. ,
21. 1125-1147
(979)
54.
Bilogan,
W,
Schlumpf,
H P,
Kunstst.,
70 6, 331-336
(980)
55.
Naik,
5 H,
M. S.
University of Lowell,
U.S.A (1978)
56.
Danyliuk,
Compound.,
57.
Kiefer,
M,
I M,
J.
Plast.
Vinyl
Techn.,
6,
47-52 (1981)
2. 2, 57-62 (983)
Page 226
References
58.
Breuer,
H,
Haaf,
F,
J,
Stabenow,
J.
Macrom.
Sci.-Phys.,
Siegmann,
Eng.
A,
English,
L K,
Bauer,
E, Hi t tner,
P,
Polym
Sci. ,
60.
Pezzin,
G,
61.
Mooney,
J, Rozkuska, K,
& Polym. ,
Plast.
37 295-299 (1969)
PVC Symp.
PVC technology',
(1986)
62.
Rabinovie,
63.
Fle1scher,
D, F1scher, E,
1,
64.
S,
J.
Vinyl
2. 4, 179-182 (1983)
Techn.,
J.
Macrom.
B(14)
Sci.-Phys.,
17-27 (1977)
D, Brandup, J, Heinzmann, D,
Fle1scher,
67 6,
Kunstst.,
312-316 (1977)
65.
AngewMakromol
62 69-84 (1977)
G, Berndtsen, N, Opfermann, J,
Menges,
Rubb.
68.
D, Kloos, F, Brandup, J,
Fle1seher,
Ch em. ,
67.
Angew Makromol
62 121-132 (1977)
Ch em. ,
66.
D, Sherer, H, Brandup, J,
Fle1scher,
&
Plast.
4 156-164 (1979)
Proc.,
S1egmann,
J.
A,
H1ltner,
A,
Polym." Eng.
Sci.,
a.!. 11,
869-876 (1984)
69.
Berens,
A R,
Folt,
V L,
Trans.
Soc.
Ll 95-111
Rheol.,
(1967)
70.
Hor1,
71.
Clark,
Y,
Japan Plast.,
M,
72.
Sc!.
AIIsopp,
2, 48 (1969)
Nature of PVC:
App!.
Formation,
Pub!.
M W,
(1982)
73.
Hattor1,
3,
T,
Tanaka,
App!.
K, Mat suo, M,
Se!.
Polym.
' Manu-
Pub!.
Eng.
(1982)
Sci.,
12
199-203 (1972)
Page 227
References
74.
Singleton,
C,
Geil,
Collins,
P H,
J, Gezovieh,
Isner,
Polym.
E A,
D M,
Eng.
Tsou,
Sci.,
P K C,
14 5,
371-381 (1974)
75.
Uitenham,
L C, Geil,
J.
PH,
Macrom.
Sci.-Phys.,
B(20)
4, 593-622 (1981)
76.
Munstedt,
J.
H,
MBcrom.
Sci. -Phys.,
B(14) 2,
195-213
(1977)
77.
Sieglaff,
78.
Mandell,
Techn.,
C L,
J F,
Darwish,
F J,
J.
Vinyl
4 3, 95-100 (1982)
79.
Rosenthal,
80.
Faulkner,
J,
J.
P G,
J.
2. 3,
Vinyl Techn.,
MBcrom.
104-109 (1983)
Sci. -Phys.,
B (11) 2,
251-279
(1975)
81.
Krzewki,
R J,
B(20) 4,
443-464 (1981)
82.
Geil,
PH,
83.
Maddams,
Collins,
Macrom.
J.
E A,
Sci.-Phys.,
84.
Se!.
Vyvoda,
Publ.
J C,
Set. -Phys.,
W F,
Macrom.
J.
(1982)
Gilbert,
M,
Hemsley,
D A,
Polyme~
21
109-115 (1980)
85.
Pham,
Q T, Millan, J, Madruga, E L,
Makromol Ch em. ,
175
945 (1974)
86.
P J,
Lemstra,
Sci. -Phys.,
87.
Pezzin,
88.
Gray,
A,
89.
Soni,
P L,
Wenig,
Cudby,
M E A,
J.
Polym.
G,
W,
A,
16 1507-1514 (1978)
Gilbert,
Geil,
Sci. -Phys.,
90.
Keller,
J.
Polymer,
M,
P H,
B(20) 4,
Polym.
17 44-50 (1976)
Collins,
E A,
J.
MBcrom.
479-503 (1981)
S7i.-Phys.,
16 1635-1649 (1978)
Page 228
References
91.
Natta,
G,
Corradini,
POlym.
J.
P,
Set.,
20251-266
(1956)
92.
Summers," W,
93.
Nakajima,
94.
40-51
(966)
Ohta,
5,
95.
A,
7,
J.
Hamada,
H,
Kajiyama, T,
Hayashi,
107-110 (1981>
Maerom.
5,
Ch em. , 95
M,
POlym. Eng.
Set.,
Polym.
Sei.-Phys.,
14
Takayanagi,
465-472 (1976)
R 5,
Straff,
Uhlmann,
J.
D R,
353-365 (1976)
96.
Singleton,
C ",
J.
E A,
Collins,
Stephenson,
Maerom.
T,
Isner,
",
Geil,
P H,
(977)
97.
Ballad,
A,
D G H,
Polymer
Burgess,
Mammi,
M,
Nardi,
99.
Baker,
C,
Maddams,
Set. -Phys.,
100.
Brady,
T E,
Dekoninck,
J M,
Roberts,
28 3-9 (1987)
Paper~
98.
A N,
Nature,
V,
W F, Preedy, J E,
1Q. 1041
(977)
Jabarin,
5 A,
Polym.
J.
Eng.
POlym.
Set., LL 9,
686-690 (977)
101.
Parey,
J,
Menges.
G,
J.
Vinyl Teehn.,
3, 152-156
0981 )
102.
Vidyikina,
L I,
Okladnov,
N A,
(965)
A,
103.
Gonze,
Plast.,
104.
Rabinovitch,
105.
Berens,
A R,
E B,
Folt,
2,
J.
Vinyl Teehn.,
V L,
49-53 (1971)
POlym. Eng.
4 2,
62-66 (982)
Set.,
1, 27-34
(1969)
106.
den Otter,
(final),
J L,
Wales,
J L 5,
Delft (1976)
Page 229
References
107.
Portingell,
G C,
Chapter 4 of Butters G
108.
Processing',
Appl.
Benjamin,
Plast.
P,
Formation,
Se!.
Publ.
& Rubb.
, Parti-
(ed)
Structure and
(982)
&
Mat.
Appl.,
151-160
(1980)
109.
Summers,
20 2,
Sd.,
110.
Summers,
P.127
111.
Isner,
155-159
W,
"
" D,
Rabinovitch,
E B,
Rabinovitch,
E A,
Collins,
1 14.
Metzger,
M W,
Conf.,
Gilbert,
Polym.
A P,
"
A,
117.
Gilbert,
& Rubb.
S V,
D A,
Eng.
Set.,
2,
Appl.
Sc!.
Obande,
0 P,
Miadonye,
A,
' Manu-
Publ.
(1982)
PVC Proc.
II
Int:
P1Bst.
& Rubb.
(1983)
M,
Jansson,
193-201
Patel,
R P,
3 343-351
Terselius,. B,
5 3,
PVC,
(1983)
Hemsley,
Appl.,
Covas,
Higgs,
P.13
M,
in Plast.
116.
Symp.
D E,
Marshall,
Proc.
115.
3rd Int.
(1970)
Allsopp,
Int.
Eng.
(1980)
113.
Polym.
E B,
(1980)
57-65
112.
"W,
Marshall,
Proc.
J F,
& Appl.,
Plast.
To be published
D E,
( 1988)
& Rubb.
Proc.
Appl.,
(1985)
PhD Thesi~
Loughborough University of
( 1983)
Technology
118.
Chart off,
R P,
119.
Katchy,
E M,
120.
BS3505
(1986)
121.
ASTM D2152-67
122.
Gilbert,
123.
Lamberty,
M,
M,
Polymer,
Kunstst.,
Mulla,
Plast.
1. 470-471
(1975)
I I 9, 585-586 (981)
M I,
Mod.
POlym.
Test.,
171-182
(1983)
(1974)
124.
Gray,
A,
PVC Proc.
Int.
Conf.,
P.10 (1978)
Page 230
References
125.
Terselius,
B,
Jansson,
J F,
Bystedt, J,
Sci. -Phys.,
126.
Moore,
PVC Proc.
127.
Han,
0 R,
C 0,
Press,
Int.
P.11
ConF.,
J. Macrom.
(1978)
Academic
128.
Gilbert,
M,
Vyvoda,
129.
Illers,
K H,
J C,
22 1134-1136 (1981)
Polyme0
(1977>
130.
Patel,
S V,
Gilbert,
M,
Plast.
1, 85-93 (1985)
131.
Covas,
J A,
Thesi~
Phd
Loughborough University of
Technology (1985)
132.
E, Menges, G,
KrUger,
Berens,
A R,
Folt,
Aachen (1984)
V L,
Polym.
Eng.
Appl.
Phys.,
!.R 6 (1945)
Sci.,
1,
5-10
(1968)
134.
Tordella,
J P,
135.
den Otter,
136.
KrUger,
137.
Gale,
138.
Guimon,
139.
Miadonye,
J.
J L,
Rheologica .Acta,
E, Adv. Polym.
G M,
Plast.
C,
Phd
Thesi~
5 1, 9-17 (1985)
38 183-191
& Polym.,
SPE-ANTE~
A,
Techn.,
8 355 (1969)
(1970)
1085-1092 (1967)
Loughborough University of
Technology (1983)
140.
Hawkins,
T,
141.
Menges,
142.
Stephenson,
143.
Marhenkel,
144.
Klenk,
J.
I G,
P,
Vinyl Techn.,
Klenk,
R C,
H,
P,
66-68 (1983)
Plastverab.,
Kunstst.,
Plast.,
5 2,
30 57-59 (1965)
Plastverab. ,_ I I 642-648,
723-730, 819-821,
881-888 (1970)
Page 231
References
145.
Reber,
146.
Gale,
147.
Berndtsen,
148.
Summers,
149.
0,
SPE-ANTEC,
GM,
RAPRA J.,
J W,
Rabinovitch,
E B,
Vinyl Teehn.,
L 1, 32-35 (1985)
J W,
Rabinovitch, E B,
Summers,
Terselius,
Proe.
151.
68-72 (1974)
Phd Thesis,
N,
Vinyl Teehn.,
150.
708-710 (1974)
B,
Appl.,
Terselius,
Jansson,
5 1,
B,
J,
Quisenberry,
J G,
J.
67-69 (1982)
2,
J.
Quisenberry,
J F,
Bystedt,
J,
P1Bst.
&
Rubb.
1-7 (1985)
Jansson,
J F,
P1Bst.
J F,
P1Bst.
4 291-299 (1984)
152.
Terselius,
B,
Jansson,
4 4, 285-290 (1984)
153.
154.
Pezzin,
G,
Ajroldi,
G,
Vittadini,
G,
J.
Appl.
Humphreys,
J,
Volkmar,
Casiraghi,
Polym.
K,
T,
Sei.,
PVC Proe.
Garbuglio,
1..
C,
1839-1849 (1972)
Int.
Conf.,
P.4
(1978)
155.
Ditto,
P E,
156.
Pat rick,
J.
S G,
Vinyl Techn.,
McKenna,
in PVC technology',
M P,
4 3,
124-127 (1982)
PVC Symp.
'Current trends
Loughborough University of
Technology (1986)
157.
158.
159.
Data Sheet:
TBLS
160.
Data Sheet:
Lead
Data Sheet:
Calcium
S68/173
Polcarb S
Stearate
161.
162.
Data Sheet:
163.
Hoechst:
PE520 (1977)
Data Sheet:
Sasolwaks H1
Page 232
References
164-.
Henkel:
Data Sheet:
165.
Henkel:
Data Sheet:
166.
Pristerene:
167.
Oletec:
Data Sheet:
168.
Pepper,
S T,
Data Sheet:
MSc
Oletec 6009
Loughborough University of
Thesi~
Technology (1984-)
169.
Barth,
170.
Hemsley,
Kunstst.,
H J,
D "A,
Higgs,
Miadonye,
A,
Polymer Comm.,
<1971>
172.
ISO/DP 6603/2.3:
174-.
Gutteridge,
175.
Draft
P A,
(1986)
(1987)
Hooley,
Will1ams,
M J,
Kunstst,
Bowerman,
H H,
McKelvey,
C J,
Moore,
D R, Turner,
S,
72 9, 54-3-54-7 (1982)
J M,
8 4,
310-318 (1968)
176.
den Otter,
L,
Laboratorium TNO,
177.
Delft
(1974-)
Fillers,
Centraal
Report
And Impact
PM/25/82 Perivale,
London
(1982)
178.
Strijbos,
179.
Obande,
5,
0 P,
Powder Techn.,
Phd
Thesi~
1.. 209-214-
(1977)
Loughborough University of
Technology (1983)
180.
Katchy,
E M,
181.
Rauwendaal,
J.
C J,
Appl.
POlym.
Set.,
28 1847-1869 (1983)
~
POlym.
Eng.
Sci.,
Schultheis,
S M,
Kunstst.,
16,
1092-1100
( 1981>
182.
Potente,
H,
77 4,
4-01-4-04
(1987)
Page 233
References
183.
Janssen,
Pub!.
184-.
L P B M,
Corp.
(1978)
F N,
Cogswell,
Oeorge Oodwin
(1981)
185.
Zolotor,
186.
Tadmor,
187.
McKelvey,
Mod.
A M,
Ind.
2,
New York
Eng.
4-7 12,
Ch em.
68-72
FundBm.,
(1970)
346 (1976)
M,
P1Bst.,
(1962)
188.
ICI Tech.
189.
Got ham,
K V,
Hitch,M J,
Brit.
Polym.
J.,
(1980)
4-7-52
( 1978)
190.
Pepper,
S T,
191.
Howard,
0 J,
Shanks,
J.
R A,
Appl.
POlym. Sci.,
26 3099
<1981 )
L E,
192.
Nielsen,
193.
Alter,
194-.
Oberst,
H,
559-590
<1971>
195.
Gonze,
A,
317-351
196.
Cross,
J.
H,
J.
Appl.
Appl.
Polym.
Polym.
Retting,
W,
Set,
Set.,
J. MBcrom.
Chauffoureaux,
J C,
(1965)
Sci.-Phys.,
3,
(1973)
A, Haward, R N, Mills, N J,
Polyme~
20 288-294-
(1979)
197.
Vincent,
198.
Parey,
199.
Marshall,
P I,
J,
Polyme~
Kruger,
0 P,
E,
P1Bst.
(1960)
Kunstst.,
2,
169-182
(1982)
200.
Stapfer,
276
201.
C H,
Hampson, D 0,
Dworkin,
R D,
SPE-ANTE~
(1968)
Collins,
E A, Hartitz, E,
P1Bst.
15-20
(1978)
Page 234
References
202.
'Perf-
Perivale,
London (1984)
203.
Obande, 0 P, Gilbert,
204-.
Mai,
Y W,
PM/5/84
Kerr,
P R,
M,
J.
To be published (1988)
Vinyl
Techn.,
7 4, 130-139
(1985)
Page 235
APPENDIX A
FORMULATION DETAILS
Properties of TBLS.
Property
TBLS
[ 159]
NLSt
[ 150]
Formula
Appearance
cream/whi te
soft white
53
l' 4
82-84
27-29
Safe PbO
51-53
27-29
Specific gravity
(%)
02
Cast
[ 15t]
Ca (CH. (CH,) "COO),
white
105
102-108
121
025
30
Determined by DSC
Page 235
Appendix/A
Sasol
HI
[162]
Manufacturer
Description
Addi tion (phr)
Solidlf icatlon
point ('C)
Drop point ('C)
Melting point t
Acid value
(mg KDH/g)
S.a/Density
(-/gem l )
Vi scoslty
(m.pa.s/cs)
Hoechst
PE520
[163]
Loxiol
815
[ 164]
Loxiol
812
[ 165]
Pristerene Oletec
4903
6009
[ 166]
[167]
Henkol
Pristerene Dletec
Sasol
Hoechst
Henkol
High M.pt Polyethylene Hydrogenated Fatty acid ester Stearic
Low M.pt
of glycerine
castor oil
ac id
paraffin
Paraffin wax
1-0
1-0
0-2 l 1-0
0- 1
0-2
1-0
98
118-123
95
(0- 1
=108
105
0
094
0,92-0-94
~25'C
59
64-90
82
(5
0-895
~20'C
~100'C
=1000
WO'C
~100'C
24
57-60
60
(2
0-5-0-915
a80'C
25-35
~80'C
53-55
54
=2
56
4-25 cs
!100'C
Page 237
APPENDIX B
ASH ANALYSIS
O~120
!l2. 5.1.
phr
of
blends
with
filler
and
ashed
content
ranging
as described
in
, r-------------------,
le
2IiJ
r.
lit
..8
50
Ash Content
= 09987
= 1.886
Page 238
APPENDIX C
o
j---H-----
o
r---H-- --------
-- ---- -I----i
-- - --
-0
-------I
ALLEN BOLT
CLAMP
'-r-~jIIIIIIII'-l7l=-l~
____ SPECIMEN
TITLE
SCALE
1: 2 (mm)
DRAWN
S.T.Pepper IPT
Page 239
APPENDIX D
EXTRUDER RESUL TS
TABLE D. 1
Extruder temBeratures
Pipe
code
Zone
one
( 'C)
EXTRUDER
Zone
two
( 'C)
TEMPERATURES
Oil
Adaptor
reservoir TMl
( 'C)
( 'C)
He6d
TM2
(. C)
OA
lA
2A
3A
4A
5A
160
158
. 158
158
158
158
160
160
161
160
161
162
142
141
141
141
141
141
156
153
152
157
159
152
170
168
164
168
164
165
OB
lB
2B
3B
4B
5B
160
158
158
158
158
159
160
160
161
160
162
162
142
141
141
141
142
141
156
153
158
157
160
155
175
170
168
168
169
169
OC
IC
2C
3C
4C
5C
160
159
158
159
159
159
160
161
161
161
161
162
142
141
141
141
141
141
156
158
158
158
158
160
183
176
177
177
178
177
OD
ID
2D
3D
4D
5D
173
172
173
172
172
173
173
175
176
176
175
175
142
141
142
141
142
142
168
165
165
165
166
167
183
180
181
182
183
182
OE
lE
2E
3E
4E
5E
173
173
173
173
173
173
173
175
175
175
175
175
142
142
141
142
142
142
168
169
169
170
171
171
192
187
186
187
187
188
OF
IF
2F
3F
4F
5F
193
191
190
191
191
191
191
193
193
193
193
193
142
142
142
143
143
143
184
185
185
186
186
187
203
194
197
197
198
198
Page 240
Appendix/D
TABLE D. 1 (cont)
Extruder temperatures
Pipe
code
Zone
one
( 'C)
EXTRUDER
Zone
two
( 'C)
TEMPERATURES
Adaptor
reservoir TM1
( 'C)
( 'C)
011
Head
TM2
('C)
OEOEA
OEB
OEC
OED
OEE
OEF
OEG
OEH
172
172
172
172
173
173
173
173
173
172
172
172
172
173
173
173
173
173
142
142
142
14-2
14-2
142
142
142
142
169
169
170
170
169
170
170
169
170
187
187
186
186
187
186
187
187
187
3E3EA
3EB
3EC
3ED
3EE
3EF
3EG
3EH
173
173
173
172
173
172
173
173
173
173
173
173
172
173
172
173
173
173
143
143
143
143
14-4
143
143
143
143
171
171
171
170
171
170
170
170
171
189
189
190
188
189
188
189
189
190
Page 241
Appendix/D
TABLE D.2
Mechanical energy:
Pipe
code
EXPERIMENTAL VALUE
Torque Output
Q
(rev, %/g)
TQ
Jb
(%)
(g/min)
filler content
Pipe
code
EXPERIMENTAL VALUE
Torque Output
Q
(rev,%/g)
TQ
III
(%)
(g/min)
OA
OB
OC
OD
OE
OF
62
53
47,5
43
42
38
130
130
130
131
131
130
40' 1
31' 4
26, 1
21' 6
20'6
16'9
lA
lB
lC
ID
lE
IF
65
57
48,5
45
42
35'5
130
127
131
136
136
136
42,0
34,0
26,9
22,6
,19'3
13,9
2A
2B
2C
2D
2E
2F
74
66
51
47,5
44' 5
37'5
133
134
128
125
134
135
49 1
42'7
29,9
27, 1
22'5
15'8
3A
3B
3C
3D
3E
3F
84
78
59
54
51
42,5
127
129
127
126
135
130
628
56'0
38' 1
33'4
28'4
21 '3
4A
4B
4C
4D
4E
4F
94
91
67
59
60
48,5
133
141
129
135
132
132
69'4
62,8
45' 3
35'8
37,6
26,7
5A
5B
5C
50
5E
5F
109
105
83
62
62
53
134
134
139
140
138
135
83'0
79,2
56'5
37,2
37,8
30'2
Page 242
Appendix/D
TABLE D.3
Extrusion pressure:
Pipe
code
EXPERIMENTAL VALUE
PI
Inlet
Head
pressure pressure pressure
(Bar)
(Bar)
(Bar)
filler content
Pipe
code
EXPERIMENTAL VALUE
Inlet
PI
Head
pressure
pressure
pressure
(Bar)
(Bar)
(bar)
OA
OB
OC
OD
OE
OF
31
25
0
0
0
0
269
236
202
175
165
127
164
131
105
97
92
80
lA
lB
lC
10
lE
IF
39
6
0
0
0
0
307
280
242
223
212
154
167
141
123
123
100
74
2A
2B
2C
20
2E
2F
62
27
0
0
0
0
348
329
274
265
246
191
192
170
145
145
122
95
3A
38
3C
30
3E
3F
77
49
0
0
0
0
415
394
334
317
286
217
226
207
184
174
152
122
4A
4B
4C
40
4E
4F
87
73
0
0
0
0
436
420
374
362
333
237
266
248
217
206
193
152
5A
5B
SC
50
5E
5F
139
120
27
0
0
0
518
496
432
400
360
260
315
290
241
228
203
179
Page 243
Appendix/D
TABLE D.4.
Extrusion results:
Pipe
code
Torque
TQ
(1.)
additive study
EXTRUDER RESULTS
Output
Inlet
PI
Q
(rev.1./g) pressure pressure
Ih
(Bar>
(Bar)
(g/m1n)
Head
pressure
(Bar)
OEOEA
OEB
OEC
OED
OEE
OEF
OEG
OEH
39
38
305
38
395
49
35
39
60
118
117
117
113
112
118
117
107
112
19'7
188
107
19'5
213
302
156
21 7
44'1
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
30
112
113
100
127
135
179
123
126
228
85
85
74
106
110
142
84
100
190
3E3EA
3EB
3EC
3ED
3EE
3EF
3EG
3EH
33'5
36
27
34
35
35
28
31
33
50
50
52
52
57
55
50
327
390
156
32'9
32'0
33'0
189
322
385
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
131
154
119
136
75
125
127
119
70
101
105
41
41
77
143
134
138
74
79
114
Page 244
APPENDIX E
FIGURE E. 1
Impact trace of 5e:
unfiltered
Drive: 3
Sample:
Details:
Date: 07/05/86
Time: 23:39:08
Mass: 25KQ:
Temp: 20'C
PEAK INFORMATION
Force=275.2 N
Deflection=1.587 mm
Energy=0.196 J
Gradient=21.92 KN/m
FAILURE INFORMATION
Deflection=44.68 mm
Energy=4.265 J
699.9
Force-Distance
...................................................................................................................... .
....................................................................,.
499.0H1
29:99
49.89
68.88
........
Page 245
Appendix/E
FIGURE E.2
Impact trace of 5C: Over-filtered
Drive:
Samp~e:
Detai~s;
Date: 07/05/86
Time: 23:39:08
Mass: 25Kg
Temp: 20'C
PEAK INFORMATION
Force=173.5 N
Def~ection=2.117
mm
EnergY=0.235 J
FAILURE INFORMATION
Def~ection=U9.80 mm
Energy=U.382 J
H
3 .
Force-Distance
rir r...............................
tfr\ I ~ I ........
188. 8
I I
I,
/1
L.._.
\\ Lr\_....
"
I~
/~<.\
. . . . . . . _. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
:
L_, / ..., :
...-
,:
..}__. . .
\ ,
. - - --\~
8~-----------'+':------------~:------~----~-8
28.88
48.98
68.88
.........
Page 246
Appendix/E
FIGURE E.3
Impact trace of 5C:
Drive:
Moderate filter
Samp~e:
Detai~s:
Date: 07/05/86
Time: 23:39:08
Mass: 25K&
Temp: 20'C
PEAK INFORMATION
Force=211.0 N
Def~ection=1.588
mm
Energy=0.198 J
FAILURE INFORMATION
Def~ection=43.62 mm
Energy=4.242 J
Force-Distance
288.8'
It
I
!
V
I :
i.
!:
r',
I~I '/1
i.
188 .8 . .............
48.88
......
68.88
Page 247
APPENDIX F
IMPACT PROPERTIES
TABLE F. 1
ImBact Brol:lert 1 es:
Test
temp
( 'C)
Peak
Peak
Force Deflection
(N/mm)
(mm)
Peak
Energy
(J Imm)
Failure
Deflection
(mm)
Failure
Energy
(J Imm)
Er
Maximum
Gradient
(KNmm/m)
Type
of
Failure
s.dt
OF:O Ilhr
-20
-10
0
10
20
41
60
80
100
166
198
1117
1170
1261
1317
1140
994
921
1 54
3' 19
1163
12'67
1490
16'45
1657
17 15
1837
O' 1
0'4
60
7 1
99
11' 2
10 1
9'5
9'4
7'21
8'41
14'43
15'97
2064
19'79
2005
2074
2398
08
l' 0
76
9 1
125
14' 1
125
11'8
123
O' 1
0'2
1 6
0'8
0'7
0'9
1'0
0'4
l' 2
152
161
150
130
119
117
110
96
76
B
B
2 11
1057
1176
12'78
15'46
1731
1727
1786
18'40
0'3
57
62
7'2
10 4
11' 7
10 6
95
9' 1
6'33
12 12
1351
15'35
17'89
19'82
21' 11
21'31
23'14
0'9
66
73
87
12 1
13'6
133
11'4
119
0'2
l' 2
l' 2
l' 0
0'7
0'5
0'2
0'6
0'5
162
lU
126
123
127
105
99
84
451
5 44
3'08
926
11 84
1386
16'82
16'84
1788
06
08
0'4
36
58
72
88
83
87
718
722
926
10'45
1305
15'85
1988
2021
21 11
09
l' 0
l' 2
4' 1
63
8' 1
10' 1
97
10 1
O' 1
O' 1
0'3
1'0
0'7
l' 3
0'6
0'3
0'5
131
148
142
119
116
100
81
78
BID
BID
D
D
D
D
D
IF:8'5 Ilhr
-20
-10
0
10
20
41
60
80
100
217
1134
1117
1182
1293
1250
1158
937
869
72
BID
BID
BID
D
D
D
D
D
191
203
180
829
1034
1059
1002
908
876
72
B
B
B
BID
BID
BID
D
D
D
= Ductile
Page 248
Appendix/F
Impact properties:
Test
temp
("C)
Peak
Peak
Force Deflection
(mm)
(N/mm)
Peak
Energy
(J Imm)
Failure
Deflection
(mm)
Failure
Energy
(J I mm)
Maximum
Gradient
(KNmmlm)
Type
of
Failure
EF
s.dt
l' 0
08
0'9
l' 0
l' 0
l' 7
2'4
4'5
6' 1
0'2
O' 1
O' 1
O' 1
0'2
0'4
l' 0
0'8
0'8
113
107
119
107
137
96
71
66
60
B
B
B
B
B
l' 2 0'2
. l' 1 0'2
l' 3 0'3
l' 5 0'4
l' 3 O' 1
l' 1 0'2
l' 1 O' 1
2,.2 O' 1
26 0'5
238
114
120
101
155
107
87
60
48
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
254
110
108
99
151
102
81
37
44
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
163
161
188
185
198
402
467
624
691
580
5'59
504
5' 12
5'39
662
8'32
1206
15' 12
0'7
06
07
07
0'7
l' 4
'2'0
38
52
354
5'84
6 15
6'74
571
6'96
591
770
855
0'5
0'7
0'9
0'9
0'9
0'8
0'8
l' 5
l' 5
1 11
5'39
595
6 12
6 15
660
5'44
5'84
599
O' 1
0'7
07
0'7
09
09
0'6
0'7
0'8
8'57
7'44
7'48
7'70
7'75
8'62
10'36
14'81
18 11
BID
BID
BID
D
4F:35'6 phr
-20
-10
0
10
20
41
60
80
100
214
172
195
183
166
180
191
371
344
7'94
8'90
9'45
11'86
8'03
10'30
8'49
11' 61
17'14
BID
BID
5F:40 phr
-20 .
-10
0
10
20
41
60
80
100
188
166
168
167
184
180
183
194
238
7'00
8'30
9'09
8'48
9'00
12'57
8'52
15'00
13'90
l' 0
l' 0
l' 1
10
l' 2
l' 6
1'0
l' 8
18
O' 1
0'1
0'2
0'1
0'3
0'3
0'3
0'2
0'2
BID
B = Brittle. BID
Brit tle/Duct ile. D = Ductile
t s.d = Sample standard del(iation
Page 249