Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Journal of Hydrology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhydrol
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 14 December 2012
Received in revised form 3 June 2013
Accepted 8 June 2013
Available online 17 June 2013
This manuscript was handled by Laurent
Charlet, Editor-in-Chief, with the assistance
of P.J. Depetris, Associate Editor
Keywords:
Developing countries
Drinking water treatment
Household water supply
Rainwater
Small communities
Water management
s u m m a r y
Decentralized drinking water systems represent an important element in the process of achieving the
Millennium Development Goals, as centralized systems are often inefcient or nonexistent in developing
countries. In those countries, most water quality related problems are due to hygiene factors and pathogens. A potential solution might include decentralized systems, which might rely on thermal and/or UV
disinfection methods as well as physical and chemical treatments to provide drinking water from rainwater. For application in developing countries, decentralized systems major constraints include low cost,
ease of use, environmental sustainability, reduced maintenance and independence from energy sources.
This work focuses on an innovative decentralized system that can be used to collect and treat rainwater
for potable use (drinking and cooking purposes) of a single household, or a small community. The experimented treatment system combines in one compact unit a Filtration process with an adsorption step on
GAC and a UV disinfection phase in an innovative design (FAD Filtration Adsorption Disinfection). All
tests have been carried out using a full scale FAD treatment unit. The efciency of FAD technology has
been discussed in terms of pH, turbidity, COD, TOC, DOC, Escherichia coli and Total coliforms. FAD technology is attractive since it provides a total barrier for pathogens and organic contaminants, and reduces turbidity, thus increasing the overall quality of the water. The FAD unit costs are low, especially if compared
to other water treatment technologies and could become a viable option for developing countries.
2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Decentralized approaches to water supply issues have been already successfully applied in many parts of developing and transition countries. These decentralized solutions deal with both
quality and availability problems and include the direct use of
alternative water sources (groundwater, rivers or rainwater),
household-based water treatment units, dual tap water systems
and distribution and sale of ready-to-use treated water (Gadgil,
1998; Mintz et al., 2001; Belgiorno and Napoli, 2000).
As water shortages occur more often, the search for alternative
water sources and ways to promote its rational use is relevant not
only to water-stressed regions but also to secure a stable water
supply that allows for rising water demand, rapid urbanization
and climate change (Ghisi et al., 2006; Villareal and Dixon, 2005;
Mun and Han, 2012; Belgiorno et al., 2013; Naddeo et al., 2013).
In some semi-arid areas of the world, rainwater harvesting has
been promoted for a long time as a useful technology, able to provide local settlements with water. For example, in 50% of the Tanzania area, people completely rely on rainwater for their survival
(Mbilinyi et al., 2005).
288
289
Fig. 1. Experimental setup of the FAD unit (left) and its section.
Table 1
Comparison of pollutants removal by the FAD process and the separate conventional GAC adsorption unit.
Analytical parameters
Raw water
Turbidity (NTU)
COD (mg/L)
TOC (mg/L)
DOC (mg/L)
UV254 (cm 1)
Escherichia coli (CFU/100 mL)
Total coliforms (CFU/100 mL)
25.88 3.62
4.79 0.56
5.952 0.71
5.398 0.517
0.086 0.008
328 126
152 32
FAD process
Separate GAC
Efuent
Removal (%)
Efuent
Removal (%)
0.42 0.06
2.39 0.35
3.383 0.43
3.383 0.436
0.052 0.003
00
01
98.3 1.6
49.9 7.5
42.8 6.9
37.3 5.9
38.3 6.7
99.99 0.0
99.99 0.0
2.13 0.42
3.70 0.63
4.278 0.49
3.169 0.419
0.060 0.005
108 92
61 29
59.7 12.7
22.8 8.7
27.8 7.1
29.3 6.0
29.9 4.7
67.9 14.3
59.8 19.1
290
Fig. 3. Removal of DOC (a), TOC (b), SCOD (c) and UV254 (d) by the FAD process.
had already gone through the pre-ltration step, there still was a
remaining fraction of DOM. On the other, the GAC adsorption surface and microltration layer in the FAD reactor can provide an
excellent surface for the attachment of microbial communities
(Guo et al., 2008), thus enhancing the DOM removal through biodegradation of the adsorbed DOM by the microorganisms on GAC
surface. Consequently, the UV irradiation still contributed to
10.0% of the DOC and 8.4% of the UV254 removal even after GAC micro-ltration, as discussed above.
COD and TOC are widely used in water treatment as surrogate
parameters to represent the content of organic matter. As illustrated in Fig. 3, COD and TOC were removed by 22.8 8.7% and
27.8 7.1% as well as 49.9 7.5% and 42.8 6.9% after the treatment without and with UV irradiation, respectively. There was still
POM in the GAC efuent with an average concentration of
0.309 mg/L as TOC, which was probably due to the presence of biolm residues developed over the GAC surface. However, the POM
concentration can be easily reduced by the micro-ltration-layer
and UV oxidation if placed in the same unit.
A synergetic effect has been observed among the GAC, microltration and UV irradiation in the FAD process referring to the dissolved and total organic matter removal simultaneously, i.e. the
GAC was able to remove a large amount of DOM in water, the
downstream microltration further eliminated the POM and nally
UV irradiation provided a complete disinfection with a stable fouling formation on the quartz glass, which is dependent on the organic matter concentration of the feed (Liu et al., 2002; GurReznik et al., 2008). As a result, the total organic matter in raw
rainwater was effectively removed through the FAD process.
3.4. Comparison of pollutants removal by FAD and conventional
adsorption
The performance of the FAD process in terms of the removal of
several pollutants has been discussed in the previous sections, and
summarized in Table 1. To further illustrate the enhanced removal
Acknowledgments
FAD treatment plant was designed and patented by Procom
S.R.L. (Firenze, Italy) and was provided for this research. Technical
assistance provided during the research activities by F. Santoriello,
P. Napodano, S. Giuliani, D. Ricco and M. Landi is highly
appreciated
References
Abbaszadegan, M., Hasan, M.N., Gerba, C.P., Roessler, P.F., Wilson, B.R., Kuennen, R.,
Van Dellen, E., 1997. The disinfection efcacy of a point-of-use water treatment
system against bacterial, viral and protozoan waterborne pathogens. Water Res
31 (3), 574582.
AWWAAPHAWEF, 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater, 20th ed., American Public Health Association/American Water
Works Association/Water Environment Federation. Washington, DC, USA.
Belgiorno, V., Napoli, R.M.A., 2000. Groundwater quality monitoring. Wat. Sci. Tech.
42 (12), 3741.
Belgiorno, V., Naddeo, V., Scannapieco, D., Zarra, T., Ricco, D., 2013. Ecological status
of rivers in preserved areas: Effects of meteorological parameters. Ecol. Eng. 53,
173182.
Domnech, L., Saur, D., 2011. A comparative appraisal of the use of rooftop
rainwater in single and multi-family buildings of the metropolitan area of
Barcelona (Spain): social experience, drinking water savings and economic
costs. J. Clean. Prod. 19, 598608.
Eroksuz, E., Rahman, A., 2010. Rainwater tanks in multi-unit buildings: a case study
for three Australian cities. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 54, 14491452.
Gadgil, A., 1998. Drinking water in developing countries. Ann. Rev. Energy Environ.
23, 253286.
Ghisi, E., Ferreira, D.F., 2007. Potential for potable water savings by using rainwater
and greywater in a multistory residential building in southern Brazil. Build.
Environ. 42, 25122522.
Ghisi, E., Montibeller, A., Schmidt, R.W., 2006. Potential for potable water savings by
using rainwater: An analysis over 62 cities in southern Brazil. Build. Environ. 41,
204210.
Ghisi, E., Bressan, D.L., Martini, M., 2007. Rainwater tank capacity and potential for
potable water savings by using rainwater in the residential sector of
southeastern Brazil. Build. Environ. 42, 16541666.
Gould, J., Nissen-Petersen, E., 1999. Rainwater Catchment Systems for Domestic
Supply: Design, Construction and Implementation. Intermediate Technology
Publications, London, UK.
Guo, W.S., Vigneswaran, S., Ngo, H.H., Xing, W., Goteti, P., 2008. Comparison of the
performance of submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) and submerged
membrane adsorption bioreactor (SMABR). Bioresour. Technol. 99 (5), 1012
1101.
291
Gur-Reznik, S., Katz, I., Dosoretz, C.G., 2008. Removal of dissolved organic matter by
granular-activated carbon adsorption as a pretreatment to reverse osmosis of
membrane bioreactor efuents. Water Res. 42 (67), 15951605.
Jones, M.P., Hunt, W.F., 2010. Performance of rainwater harvesting systems in the
southeastern United States. Resour. Conser. Recy. 54, 623629.
Khastagir, A., Jayasuriya, N., 2010. Optimal sizing of rainwater tanks for domestic
water conservation. J. Hydrol. 381, 181188.
Lantagne, S., Quick, R., Mintz, E.D., 2007. Household water treatment and safe.
Storage Options in Developing Countries. A Review of Current Implementation
Practices. Woodrows, Wilson International Center for Scholars, USA.
Li, Z., Boyle, F., Reynolds, A., 2010. Rainwater harvesting and greywater treatment
systems for domestic application in Ireland. Desalination 260, 18.
Liu, W., Wu, H., Wang, Z., Ong, S.L., Hu, J.Y., Ng, W.J., 2002. Investigation of
assimilable organic carbon (AOC) and bacterial regrowth in drinking water
distribution system. Water Res. 36 (4), 891898.
Mbilinyi, B.P., Tumbo, S.D., Mahoo, H.F., Senkondo, E.M., Hatibu, N., 2005.
Indigenous knowledge as decision support tool in rainwater harvesting. Phys.
Chem. Earth, Pts. A/B/C. Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) and
the Millennium Development Goals. Managing Water for Peace and Prosperity
30 (1116), 792798.
Mintz, E., Bartram, J., Lochery, P., Wegelin, M., 2001. Not just a drop in the bucket:
expanding access to point-of-use water treatment systems. Am. J. Public Health
91, 15651570.
Mun, J.S., Han, M.Y., 2012. Design and operational parameters of a rooftop rainwater
harvesting system: denition, sensitivity and verication. J. Environ. Manage.
93, 147153.
Murcott, S., 2005. Decentralized Household Water Treatment and Sanitation
Systems MIT Kenya Project. Report by the Department of Civil and
Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Naddeo, V., Belgiorno, V., 2007. Tertiary ltration in small wastewater treatment
plants. Water Sci. Technol. 55, 219225.
Naddeo, V., Belgiorno, V., Zarra, T., Scannapieco, D., 2013. Dynamic and embedded
evaluation procedure for strategic environmental assessment. Land Use Pol. 31,
605612.
Rahman, A., Keane, J., Imteaz, M.A., 2012. Rainwater harvesting in Greater Sydney:
water savings, reliability and economic benets. Resour. Conser. Recy. 61, 16
21.
Sobsey, M.D., 2002. Managing water in the home: accelerated health gains from
improved water supply. Water, Sanitation and Health. Department of Protection
of the Human Environment, World Health Organization, vol. 1, pp. 170.
Sobsey, M.D., Stauber, C.E., Casanova, L.M., Brown, J.M., Elliott, M.A., 2008. Point of
use household drinking water ltration: a practical, effective solution for
providing sustained access to safe drinking water in the developing world.
Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 (12), 42614426.
Villareal, E.L., Dixon, A., 2005. Analysis of a rainwater collection system for domestic
water supply in Ringdansen, Norrkping, Sweden. Build. Environ. 40, 1174
1184.
Zhu, K., Zhang, L., Hart, W., Liu, M., Chen, H., 2004. Quality issues in harvested
rainwater in arid and semi-arid Loess Plateau of northern China. J. Arid Environ.
57 (4), 487505.