Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Hello everyone,
I just wanted to say that it has been a great 2 year run for me, trying to become a CSP.
Before i ventured into this, i had the following perceptions about CSS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
That
That
That
That
My perception about the exams changed after the first attempt. True one needs to memorise portions, but
its not just about cramming, its also about the concepts and how well one can articulate or express those
concepts into the written form. I wrote about 12-13 pages in my Essay (without EVER preparing or
practising for an essay) and got 46.
So, its the quality that matters, not the quantity. I advise people not to panic in the exams when they hear
others asking for extra sheets halfway through the examinations.
The first time i took the exams, i was working and thought that i would just see what the exams were about.
I studied for a month max and appeared in CE-2014. I thoroughly enjoyed the overall experience and
poured my heart out in the exams. I didn't make it when the result came out and failed one optional paper.
I thought that i should give it another try and went for the CE-2015 exams. I studied for around 3 months
this time. Quit my job to devote more time to studies. This time, i have a better feeling about the exams.
Rest is up to God inshaAllah.
All in all, it was a great experience because i studied a kaleidoscope of interesting subjects which
broadened my knowledge about the world, history, law, politics, Pakistan, and International Affairs - subjects
that i had never studied before in school, college or university. I wish our schools would include subjects like
Sociology, Philosophy, International Relations, International Law etc. in the syllabus.
I do, however have certain issues with the examiners, and how the examinations are administered.
1. "Beauty lies in the eyes of the examiner".
I am against the beautification of papers, i.e., using markers for headings, then underlining the headings,
making margins, using quote after quote etc. These are competitive examinations. Although it may make
sense using these things to make your paper stand out, but they do not in any way certify the quality of
your written content. We are not in grade 4. We should not be forced to do this to get better grades. We can
send you a sticker book of Barbie and a pack of crayons instead if you want.
2. The first three days of the exams make or break the aspirants. 6 subjects in 3 days, 9-5 makes one go
crazy. There should be a gap in between the first three days. A subject like Pakistan Affairs is lengthy and
takes time to revise.
3. Wouldn't it be better if one has to take optionals according to their group preference? For example, if a
person wants to go to the Foreign Services, then he should be liable to take up International Relations as
well as International Law, using a higher weightage on these subjects since they are DIRECTLY related to his
preferred field. Similarly, Public Administration should act as the same for the ones preferring PAS.
4. It seems that the examiners single out papers on pre-conceived notions and give them similar marks.
For example, last year, there were numerous people who received 10 marks in their Essay exams, a number
of people who received EXACTLY 40 etc. Why not 11, 12, or 41, 42 ? This just shows that the examiners do
not really go through the whole papers. They see a bad point and voila!, they give you 10!
5. Examinations: I am not anti-feminism or anything like that but, like the army Naakas (barricades)
where the army personnel let you go if they see a female sitting in the car, the invigilators let the females
cheat their way through the whole paper. I am not saying that they should allow guys to do this as well. No,
not at all. I am saying that they should be able to stop the female candidates from conversing throughout
the exams, because it is VERY distracting. Bring in female invigilators if you must but PLEASE, do not