Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
graphical method
V. O. Salvadori, R. O. Reynoso, A. de Michelis and R. H. Mascheroni
Centro de Investigacidn y Dessarrollo en Criotecnologla de Alimentos (CIDCA), Facultad de
Ciencias Exactas 47 y 116 (1900), La Plata, Argentina
Received 21 November 1986: revised 6 March 1987
A graphical method is proposed for the estimation of freezing times of foods with a high water content. It has
been developed from the predictions of a numerical model which solves the heat balance for a food
undergoing freezing. The method is valid for foods with different shapes (fiat plate, cylinder and sphere) and
covers a wide range of working conditions for industrial freezers. It also enables the prediction to be made for
any given end temperature in the thermal centre of the food. Freezing times predicted by this method have
been compared with published experimental data, giving an average error in the predicted values of only 4 9/0.
(Keyworfls:freezing;freezingtimes; foodproducts)
Nomenclature
h
ko
Bi
C
Cpo
e
Fo
(Wm-1 of-1 )
During the last few years there has been a notable increase
in published literature referring to freezing time
predictions for foods. The following two different
approaches have been used:
1. numerical methods: these are based on the solution of
the differential thermal balance for the food to be frozen.
They also allow for variations in the thermophysical
properties of the food with temperature. In general they
require complex calculations and a powerful computer.
With these methods freezing time, tf, as well as
temperature profiles as functions of time can be predicted.
It is also possible to study the influence of each individual
process parameter on freezing timer-9; and
2. approximate methods: these are developed to
m, n
t
tf
T
Tc
Tcr
Ti
T~
X
~to
Po
0140-7007/87/060357-05503.00
357
al.
25t'~
10 '~
:l
Proposed method
~.+~,~_.~_--:
:+7. ~ ',
-10
-15
-20
~
i
~
i
\
',
\\
\\\
,
I
/41
Fo
20
t15 ........ ~... "="'=''=,=
oS ~c
3
N\
"'::".-~
..........
" - ; . - . . . .......
Fo[(Tr- Tcr)/Tcr]"
X - (1/Bi + C)[(Tcr- Ti)/Tcr] n
~.
,....
(l)
,~
\ '~... ~,
,+
--2C
ZIo
~0
I0
~0 - -
X (dimensionless)
1 Temperatures during freezing at the centre of a slab of meat
cooled with heat flow perpendicular to fibres. (a) Independent variable:
dimensionless time, Fo. (b) Independent variable: characteristic
parameter, X. Freezing conditions:- - -, Bi = 1, Ti = 7, Tf = - 25; . . . . . ,
Bi=2, T~=7, 7 ~ = - 4 5 ; . . . . .
, Bi=5, Ti=7, 7~=35; - - + - - +
,
Bi=13, 7]=25, T f = - 4 0 ;
, Bi=13, 7]=15, T f = - 4 0 ;
- - o - - o - - , Bi=13, Ti=2 , 7~= - 4 0 ; ..... , Bi=35, ~ = 7 , 7~= - 3 5
Figure 1 Evolution de la temp&ature au cours de la conqdlation d'une
Figure
o--, Bi=13,
Fo=A(1/Bi+C)[(Tcr-
Ti)/Tcr]n[(Tf - Tcr)/Tcr] -m
(2)
Table 1 Extreme ranges of processing conditions used in the definition of the method and values of empirical constants used in the calculation of X
Tableau 1 Domaines extremes de conditions de traitement utilis~es dans la dbfinition de la re&bode et des valeurs des constantes empiriques utilisbes dans le
calcul de X
Value of
constants in X formula
7] (C)
Tf (C)
Bi
2-25
- 25
- 45
1-50
1.04
0.09
0.18
2-20
- 25
- 45
1-60
1.03
0.10
0.16
- 2(~-
40
1-30
1.00
0.09
0.17
- 25- - 45
1-20
0.90
0.06
0.18
358
2-25
T h e c u r v e s e l e c t e d f o r t h e c a l c u l a t i o n s is s h o w n ; t h i s w a s
used to average the variation
range of X for each
temperature. It should be noted that this method allows
o n e t o e s t i m a t e tt f o r a n y f i n a l To, w h e n m o s t o f t h e
approximate
methods
are only valid for a set final
temperature, generally - 10 or - 18C.
I n Table 2 e x p e r i m e n t a l a n d t h e o r e t i c a l ( n u m e r i c a l )
v a l u e s o f tr a r e c o m p a r e d t o t h e e v a l u a t i o n m a d e w i t h t h e
proposed
method
for different foods with flat plate
geometry.
The average percentage
error for all the
p u b l i s h e d T y l o s e 11 r e s u l t s is 6 . 9 ~ o , w h i l s t f o r t h o s e
p u b l i s h e d i n R e f e r e n c e 19 t h e e r r o r is 2 . 9 ~o. A s c a n b e
o b s e r v e d p r e d i c t i o n is v e r y g o o d , e v e n f o r n o n - b e e f
p r o d u c t s . T h e s a m e c u r v e is v a l i d f o r s u b s t a n c e s w i t h h i g h
water content and structures which are not very regular in
t h e d i r e c t i o n o f h e a t f l u x (for e x a m p l e , m i n c e d m e a t s ,
Figure l a s h o w s
predicted time-temperature
curves,
calculated with the numerical model, for the thermal
c e n t r e o f a f l a t p l a t e o f b e e f w h i c h is f r o z e n w i t h h e a t f l o w
in a direction perpendicular
to the fibres. Each curve
represents the output of one run of the computer program
of the model. These thermal histories correspond to very
different freezing conditions, calculated using the most
e x t r e m e v a l u e s o f Ti, Tf a n d Bi f o u n d i n i n d u s t r i a l f r e e z i n g
p r o c e s s e s . Figure l b s h o w s t h e s a m e c u r v e s p l o t t e d i n
terms of the new variable, X. In the temperature range in
which the product can be considered as partially or
wholly frozen, the maximum separation between curves
(in t e r m s o f X ) is o n l y 1 2 ~ .
I n Figure 2 t h e r e g i o n f r o m - 2 t o - 1 8 C is s h o w n f o r
t h e s a m ~ p r o d u c t a n d w o r k i n g c o n d i t i o n s a s i n Figure 1.
Table 2 Comparison of published freezing times with those predicted by this work for a flat plate with heat flow perpendicular to the fibres
Tableau 2
Comparaison des temps de congblation publibs avec ceux prbvus d' aprbs cette &ude pour une plaque plane avec flux thermique perpendiculaire
aux fibres
tf,exp
(h)
tf, pred
-18
-18
-18
- 18
- 18
1.30
1.52
1.57
2.47
2.83
1.29
1.59
1.64
2.78
3.03
-0.86
4.50
4.22
12.63
6.97
- 37.0
-40.15
-33.15
- 39.9
- 18
-18
-18
- 18
1.90
1.47
1.92
1.65
1.92
1.56
1.77
1.54
1.28
6.13
-7.98
-6.43
3.0
28.0
3.0
30.0
28.6
16.5
-28.4
-25.0
- 23.9
- 25.4
- 25.7
- 28.8
-10
-10
- 10
- 10
- 10
- 10
3.30
2.32
3.84
1.68
1.54
2.34
3.42
2.38
3.69
1.73
1.58
2.31
3.80
2.65
- 3.94
3.05
2.31
- 1.42
4.12
0.99
4.4
2.99
6.11
3.53
0.72
0.32
18.3
15.0
16.8
4.0
28.0
11.8
28.4
4.7
-26.7
- 25.0
-25.5
- 30.6
-24.3
- 24.9
- 25.9
- 25.9
-10
- 10
-18
- 18
-10
- 10
- 10
- 10
1.58
4.48
1.47
1.50
3.12
3.72
1.76
3.02
1.57
4.67
1.44
1.46
3.22
3.93
1.66
3.01
-0.54
4.26
-1.73
- 2.57
3.27
5.64
- 5.85
- 0.28
51.9
410.0
51.9
21.6
410.0
30.6
30.6
430.0
51.9
21.6
16.7
3.06
24.20
3.06
1.27
16.30
1.22
1.22
8.81
1.06
0.44
0.34
10.0
3.0
30.0
10.0
11.0
20.0
20.0
3.0
30.0
30.0
28.7
- 40.0
-22.0
- 20.0
- 40.0
-21.0
- 30.0
- 30.0
- 19.0
-40.0
-40.0
-26.0
- 10
-10
- 10
- 10
-10
- 10
- 10
- 10
-10
-10
-10
2.22
1.92
4.80
4.02
1.00
2.74
2.66
0.34
0.64
1.42
2.68
2.25
1.70
5.20
4.28
0.98
2.90
2.90
0.32
0.66
1.44
2.89
1.49
-11.27
8.44
6.58
-2.10
5.76
9.02
- 5.96
2.89
1.24
7.99
0.024
68.5
3.43
3.9
-28.7
-18
1.65
1.68
2.18
0.0145
0.006
0.0055
0.0135
108.0
108.0
106.0
68.0
2.85
1.18
1.06
1.67
3.5
16.8
4.4
17.4
-29.3
-30.9
- 25.7
- 25.2
-18
-18
- 18
- 18
0.55
0.22
0.21
1.00
0.61
0.22
0.22
1.03
10.50
0.00
3.20
3.25
Numerical method
Extreme values of process conditions
ko=0.513 W i n - 1 C -1
= 1.268 x 10- 7 m 2 s - 1
0.036
0.036
0.036
0.036
0.036
14.25
14.25
185.96
185.96
490.91
1.0
1.0
13.05
13.05
34.45
7.0
7.0
2.0
25.0
7.0
-25.0
-45.0
-40.0
- 40.0
- 35.0
- 18
-18
-18
- 18
- 18
12.63
6.29
1.47
1.76
1.44
12.17
6.48
1.46
1.78
1.5
-3.66
2.99
-0.53
0.90
4.20
L
(m)
h
(W m - 2 C - ' )
Bi
~
(C)
7~
(C)
Tc
(C)
Lean beef 16
ko =0.48 W m -1 C-1
~o= 1.311 x 10-7m2 s - t
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.047
168.5
146.9
88.1
72.2
120.5
10.53
9.18
5.51
4.51
11.80
18.3
18.0
17.8
22.0
8.0
-38.7
-33.3
-39.9
- 27.3
- 36.5
M u t t o n 1
ko = 0.495 W m -1 C -1
cto= 1.24 x 10-7 m2 s - I
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
79.5
99.58
120.53
102.89
4.82
6.04
7.30
6.24
10.6
9.6
10.3
9.4
Minced meat 11
ko=0.44 W m -1 C -1
~o = 1.302 x 10- ~ m z s - 1
0.02425
0.036"
0.036 a
0.02425"
0.0125"
0.0125 a
21.6
220.0
51.9
90.0
30.6
16.7
1.19
18.00
4.25
4.96
0.87
0.47
0.02425
0.02425
0.022
0.023
0.036"
0.036 a
0.0125"
0.0125"
90.0
21.6
106.0
69.0
90.0
51.9
30.6
13.6
0.036
0.036"
0.036"
0.036"
0.02425 a
0.02425"
0.02425"
0.0125 a
0.0125 a
0.0125"
0.0125"
Carp 19
ko=0.48 W m - 1 oC-1
cto=1.341 x 10 - ~ m 2 s -1
Material
(h)
Error
(%)
359
,,~ , ,~,,7,
"-
(..
',
'2,
-;5
"',.X',',
i
-ZOo
50
70
80
9o
X (dimensionless)
-2
-6
",,,
-1(
,,
U -lz
t_
-18
n
I
28
I
32
Xl \
36
x I
40
60
\l'~
70
80
90
b-
-2
I
t
l
l
l
-6
l
l
'\i
\
I
-10
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
",
\
'\
"
')
\~ X \\
-1L
-1
__1
14
1{3
18
20
60
70
80
90
X (dimensiontess)
Figure 3 Reducedcurves for the temperature of the centre of different shaped foods.
, Proposed criterion; - - -, extreme ranges of variation of the
numerical method. (a) Cylinder; (b) flat plate with heat flow parallel to fibres; (c) sphere; (d) flat plate with heat flow perpendicular to fibres
Figure 3 Courbes reduites pour la tempbrature centrale d'aliments de formes differentes.
, Critbre propose; - - -, domaines extrbnes de variation de la
mbthode numbrique. (a) Cylindre; (b) plaque plane avec flux thermique parallble aux fibres; (c) sphbre; (d) plaque plane avec flux thermique perpendiculaire
aux fibres
360
Material
L
(m)
h
(W m - 2 C- ~)
Lean beef19
ko=0.51Wm 1 oC-1
0.024
0.0235
106.0
69.0
15.56
777.78
535.89
535.89
77.78
~o = 1 . 3 9 7 x 1 0 - 7 m 2
Ti
(C)
Tff
(C)
Tc
(C)
tf,exp
(h)
4.99
3.18
17.4
4.3
- 25.2
-27.6
- 18
- 18
1.81
1.75
1.65
1.67
- 8.99
-4.84
1.00
50.00
34.45
34.45
5.00
7.0
7.0
7.0
2.0
20.0
-25
- 25
- 45
- 40
- 45
11.55
1.77
0.94
1.02
2.01
11.19
1.74
0.98
1.00
2.05
-3.12
- 1.91
3.89
- 1.72
1.90
Bi
c o r r e s p o n d i n g to p r o d u c t s w i t h differences in w a t e r
c o n t e n t , h o m o g e n e i t y , s t r u c t u r e , etc., w e r e used. T h e
m a x i m u m e r r o r in t h e c a l c u l a t i o n o f tf was 13 %, t h e
o v e r a l l m e a n e r r o r w a s 4 . 1 % , a n d 90 % o f t h e p o i n t s lay
w i t h i n an e r r o r o f - 8.0 to + 8.2 %. T h e s e results i n d i c a t e
t h a t this m e t h o d has a v e r y s a t i s f a c t o r y p r e c i s i o n .
T h e f o l l o w i n g is a p r a c t i c a l g u i d e to the steps r e q u i r e d
t o use this m e t h o d :
1. t h e p r o d u c t is d e f i n e d a n d its t h e r m a l p r o p e r t i e s in
t h e u n f r o z e n s t a t e a r e o b t a i n e d f r o m t h e l i t e r a t u r e o r by
measurement;
2. o n c e the g e o m e t r y is given, t h e d e s i r e d final
t e m p e r a t u r e is selected for t h e t h e r m a l c e n t r e ;
3. w o r k i n g c o n d i t i o n s a r e defined (T~, Tf a n d Bi);
4. t h e X v a l u e is o b t a i n e d f r o m the c o r r e s p o n d i n g
curve; and
5. tf is c a l c u l a t e d , r e a r r a n g i n g E q u a t i o n (1) t o o b t a i n :
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
T h u s , it c a n be seen t h a t this m e t h o d c o m b i n e s
s i m p l i c i t y w i t h a d e g r e e o f p r e c i s i o n c o m p a r a b l e to t h a t of
much more involved approximate or even numerical
m e t h o d s . I n a d d i t i o n , o n l y o n e g r a p h is n e c e s s a r y for a
w i d e v a r i e t y o f f o o d s h a v i n g t h e s a m e g e o m e t r y o r for a n y
final t e m p e r a t u r e .
F i n a l l y , it s h o u l d b e n o t e d t h a t a l t h o u g h v a l u e s o f m, n
a n d C w e r e o b t a i n e d for t h e r a n g e s o f p r o c e s s p a r a m e t e r s
specified in Table 1, w o r k i n g o u t s i d e t h o s e limits will n o t
l e a d to h i g h e r e r r o r s in t h e e s t i m a t i o n of tf, as s h o w n by
s o m e of t h e d a t a ( m a r k e d a) in Table 2.
14
15
16
17
18
19
References
20
1
2
3
Error
(%)
s -1
Numerical method
0.036
Extreme values of process conditions 0.036
0.036
0.036
0.036
tf =
tf,pred
(h)
21
22
18
18
18
18
18
361