Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ON
CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY
(FOR THE PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE EXAMINATION OF
7TH SEMESTER UNDER DIBRUGARH UNIVERSITY)
SUBMITTED BY:
SHUBHAM HEDA
(C 09/12)
TEMSUTOSHI AO
(C 76/12)
VIDISHA JHA
(C 73/11)
NAYANJOYTI KALITA (C 78/13D)
0|Page
CANDIDATES DECLARATION
We hereby declare that the work presented in the project CONCRETE
TECHNOLOGY is hereby submitted to the Department of Civil
Engineering, Jorhat Engineering College, Jorhat in authentic record of our
own work carried out for a period from August 2015 to December 2015 under
the supervision and guidance of Mr. Rituparna Goswami, Assistant
Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Jorhat Engineering College. The
matter embodied in this project has not been submitted by us for the award of
any other degree.
SHUBHAM HEDA
(C 09/12)
TEMSUTOSHI AO
(C 76/12)
VIDISHA JHA
(C 73/11)
NAYANJOYTI KALITA (C 78/13D)
This is to certify that the above statement made by the candidate is correct to
the best of my knowledge.
1|Page
CERTIFICATE OF EXAMINERS
This is to certify that the project report entitled CONCRETE
TECHNOLOGY is hereby accorded our approval as a study carried out and
presented in a manner required for acceptance in partial fulfillment for the
award of BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING (CIVIL) degree for approval.
This approval however does not necessarily endorse or accept every
statement made, opinion expressed or conclusion drawn as recorded in the
report. It only signifies the acceptance of the project report for a purpose for
which it is submitted.
External Examiner
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
2|Page
We take this stand to express our heartfelt gratitude to our Head of the
Department, Dr.P.K.Khaund sir for giving us this opportunity to take up this
interesting project. We feel privileged in extending our earnest obligation,
deep sense of gratitude appreciation and honor to Mr. Rituparna Goswami,
Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Jorhat Engineering
College, Jorhat whose benevolent guidance, apt suggestions, unstinted help
and constructive criticism have inspired us in successful completion of
making of this project.
We express our appreciation and thanks to all the faculty members and
staff of the Department of Civil Engineering, Jorhat Engineering College, for
free exchange of ideas and discussions which proved helpful.
We wish to acknowledge the affection and moral support of our parents,
our brothers and sisters for being so understanding helpful during this period.
Finally, we are thankful and grateful to God, the Almighty for ushering
His blessings on all of us.
Date: 10.12.2015
Place: Jorhat
CONTENTS
3|Page
SHUBHAM HEDA
(C 09/12)
TEMSUTOSHI AO
(C 76/12)
VIDISHA JHA
(C 73/11)
NAYANJOYTI KALITA (C 78/13D)
Chapter
No
Page
Certificate of Declaration...1
Acknowledgement.2
Introduction3-5
Laboratory Tests6-8
Data Collected at site.9
Computation of Foundation Depth Requirement......10
Computation Of S.B.C11-13
Bibliography..13
1 INTRODUCTION
4|Page
The process of selecting suitable ingredients of concrete and determining their relative
amounts with the objective of producing a concrete of the required, strength, durability,
and workability as economically as possible, is termed the concrete mix design. The
proportioning of ingredient of concrete is governed by the required performance of
concrete in two states, namely the plastic and the hardened states. If the plastic concrete is
not workable, it cannot be properly placed and compacted. The property of workability,
therefore, becomes of vital importance.
The compressive strength of hardened concrete which is generally considered to be an
index of its other properties, depends upon many factors, e.g. quality and quantity of
cement, water and aggregates; batching and mixing; placing, compaction and curing. The
cost of concrete is made up of the cost of materials, plant and labour. The variations in the
cost of materials arise from the fact that the cement is several times costly than the
aggregate, thus the aim is to produce as lean a mix as possible. From technical point of
view the rich mixes may lead to high shrinkage and cracking in the structural concrete, and
to evolution of high heat of hydration in mass concrete which may cause cracking.
The actual cost of concrete is related to the cost of materials required for producing a
minimum mean strength called characteristic strength that is specified by the designer of
the structure. This depends on the quality control measures, but there is no doubt that the
quality control adds to the cost of concrete. The extent of quality control is often an
economic compromise, and depends on the size and type of job. The cost of labour
depends on the workability of mix, e.g., a concrete mix of inadequate workability may
result in a high cost of labour to obtain a degree of compaction with available equipment.
5|Page
Concretes properties make it the building material of choice for most purposes. The most
important features are:
Used in the majority of buildings, bridges, tunnels and dams for its strength.
Concrete structures can withstand natural disasters such as earthquakes and hurricanes.
Roman buildings over 1,500 years old such as the Coliseum are living examples of the
strength and durability of concrete.
6|Page
Fine Aggregate
Those particles passing almost entirely passing the 4.75 mm sieve, and predominantly
retained on the 75 m sieve are called fine aggregate.
Composition
Size & Shape
Surface Texture
Specific Gravity
Bulk Density
Voids
Porosity & Absorption
Bulking of Sand
Fineness Modulus of Aggregate
Surface Index of Aggregate
Deleterious Material
Crushing Value of Aggregate
7|Page
13.
14.
1. Composition
Aggregates consisting of materials that can react with alkalis in cement and cause
excessive expansion, cracking and deterioration of concrete mix should never be used.
Therefore it is required to test aggregates to know whether there is presence of any such
constituents in aggregate or not.
2. Size and Shape
The size and shape of the aggregate particles greatly influence the quantity of cement
required in concrete mix and hence ultimately economy of concrete. For the preparation
of economical concrete mix on should use largest coarse aggregates feasible for the
structure. IS-456 suggests following recommendation to decide the maximum size of
coarse aggregate to be used in P.C.C & R.C.C mix.
Maximum size of aggregate should be less than
3. Surface Texture
The development of hard bond strength between aggregate particles and cement paste
depends upon the surface texture, surface roughness and surface porosity of the
aggregate particles.If the surface is rough but porous, maximum bond strength develops.
8|Page
In porous surface aggregates, the bond strength increases due to setting of cement paste
in the pores.
4. Specific Gravity
The ratio of weight of oven dried aggregates maintained for 24 hours at a temperature of
100 to 1100C, to the weight of equal volume of water displaced by saturated dry surface
aggregate is known as specific gravity of aggregates.
Specific gravities are primarily of two types.
Specific gravity is a mean to decide the suitability of the aggregate. Low specific gravity
generally indicates porous, weak and absorptive materials, whereas high specific gravity
indicates materials of good quality. Specific gravity of major aggregates falls within the
range of 2.6 to 2.9.
Specific gravity values are also used while designing concrete mix.
5. Deleterious materials
Aggregates should not contain any harmful material in such a quantity so as to affect the
strength and durability of the concrete. Such harmful materials are called deleterious
materials. Deleterious materials may cause one of the following effects
Organic impurities
Clay , silt & dust
Salt contamination
limits as a result of-some further tests and evidence of satisfactory performance of the
aggregates.
6. Crushing Value
The aggregates crushing value gives a relative measure of resistance of an aggregate to
crushing under gradually applied compressive load. The aggregate crushing strength
value is a useful factor to know the behavior of aggregates when subjected to
compressive loads. Aggregate crushing value, when determined in accordance with IS:
2386 (Part IV)-1963 shall not exceed 45 percent for aggregate used for concrete other
than for wearing surfaces, and 30 percent for concrete for wearing surfaces, such as
runways, roads, as per IS: 383-1970.
7. Impact Value
The aggregate impact value gives a relative measure of the resistance of an aggregate to
sudden shock or impact. The impact value of an aggregate is sometime used as an
alternative to its crushing value. The aggregate impact value may be determined in
accordance with the method specified in (IS: 2386 Part IV)-1963. The aggregate impact
value shall not exceed 45 percent by weight for aggregates used for concrete other than
for wearing surfaces and 30 percent by weight for concrete for wearing surfaces, such as
runways, roads and pavements as per IS: 383-1970.
8. Abrasion Value of aggregates
The abrasion value gives a relative measure of resistance of an aggregate to wear when it
is rotated in a cylinder along with some abrasive charge. Unless otherwise agreed to
between the purchaser and the supplier, the abrasion value of aggregates, when tested in
accordance with the method specified in IS: 2386 (Part IV) - 1963 using Los Angeles
machine, shall not exceed the following values: a) For aggregates to be used in 30
percent concrete for wearing surfaces,) For aggregates to be used in 50 percent other
concrete as per IS: 383-1970.
9. Flakiness and elongation Index
Flakiness and elongation shall be determined in accordance with IS 2386 (Part 1) on the
same sample. After carrying out the flakiness index test, the flaky material shall be
removed from sample and the remaining portion shall be used for carrying out
elongation index. Indices so worked out shall be added numerically to give combined
flakiness and elongation index. The combined flakiness and elongation index so
obtained shall not exceed 40 percent for uncrushed or crushed aggregate. However, the
10 | P a g e
engineer-in-charge at his discretion, may relax the limit keeping in view the requirement,
and availability of aggregates and performance based on tests on
Degree of compaction
Grading of aggregates
Shape of aggregate particles
2. Voids
The empty spaces between the aggregate particles are known as voids. The volume of
void equals the difference between the gross volume of the aggregate mass and the
volume occupied by the particles alone.
3. Porosity and Absorption
The minute holes formed in rocks during solidification of the molten magma, due to air
bubbles, are known as pores. Rocks containing pores are called porous rocks. Water
absorption may be defined as the difference between the weight of very dry aggregates
and the weight of the saturated aggregates with surface dry conditions. Depending upon
the amount of moisture content in aggregates, it can exist in any of the 4 conditions.
4. Bulking of sand
11 | P a g e
It can be defined as in increase in the bulk volume of the quantity of sand in a moist
condition over the volume of the same quantity of dry or completely saturated sand. The
ratio of the volume of moist sand due to the volume of sand when dry, is called bulking
factor. Fine sands bulk more than coarse sand. When water is added to dry and loose
sand, a thin film of water is formed around the sand particles. Interlocking of air in
between the sand particles and the film of water tends to push the particles apart due to
surface tension and increases the volume. But in case of fully saturated sand the water
films are broken and the volume becomes equal to that of dry sand.
5. Fineness modulus
Fineness modulus is an empirical factor obtained by adding the cumulative percentages
of aggregate retained on each of the standard sieves ranging from 80 mm to 150 micron
and dividing this sum by 100.Fineness modulus is generally used to get an idea of how
coarse or fine the aggregate is. More fineness modulus value indicates that the aggregate
is coarser and small value of fineness modulus indicates that the aggregate is finer.
6. Specific Surface
The surface area per unit weight of the material is termed as specific surface. This is an
indirect measure of the aggregate grading. Specific surface increases with the reduction
in the size of aggregate particle. The specific surface area of the fine aggregate is very
much more than that of coarse aggregate.
7. Grading
The grading of fine aggregates, when determined as described in IS: 2386 (Part I)-1963
shall be within the limits given in Table 4 of IS 2386 and shall be described as fine
aggregates, Grading Zones I, II, III and IV: Where the grading falls outside the limits of
any particular grading zone of sieves other than 600-micron IS Sieve by a total amount
not exceeding 5 percent, it shall be regarded as falling within that grading zone. This
tolerance shall not be applied to percentage passing the 600-micron IS Sieve or to
percentage passing other sieve size on the coarse limit of Grading Zone I or the finer
limit of Grading Zone IV.
1.4.1 CEMENT
Cement is binder a substance that sets and hardens and can bind other materials together.
The word "cement" can be traced back to the Roman term opus caementicium, used to
describe masonry resembling modern concrete that was made from crushed rock
with burnt lime as binder. The volcanic ash and pulverized brick supplements that were
12 | P a g e
added to the burnt lime, to obtain hydraulic binder were later referred to as cement.
Cements used in construction can be characterized as being either hydraulic or nonhydraulic, depending upon the ability of the cement to set in the presence of water.
Non-hydraulic cement will not set in wet conditions or underwater; rather, it sets as it
dries and reacts with carbon dioxide in the air. It can be attacked by some aggressive
chemicals after setting.
Hydraulic cements (e.g., Portland cement) set and become adhesive due to a chemical
reaction between the dry ingredients and water. The chemical reaction results in mineral
hydrates that are not very water-soluble and so are quite durable in water and safe from
chemical attack. This allows setting in wet condition or underwater and further protects
the hardened material from chemical attack. The chemical process for hydraulic cement
found by ancient Romans used volcanic ash (activated aluminium silicates) with lime
(calcium oxide).
The most important uses of cement are as a component in the production of mortar in
masonry, and of concrete, a combination of cement and an aggregate to form a strong
building material.
14 | P a g e
Oil Well Cement: Made of iron, coke, limestone and iron scrap, Oil Well
Cement is used in constructing or fixing oil wells. This is applied on both the off-shore
and on-shore of the wells.
Clinker Cement: Produced at the temperature of about 1400 to1450 degree
Celsius, clinker cement is needed in the construction work of complexes, houses and
bridges. The ingredients for this cement comprise iron, quartz, clay, limestone and
bauxite.
White cement: It is a kind of Ordinary Portland Cement. The ingredients of this cement
are inclusive of clinker, fuel oil and iron oxide. The content of iron oxide is maintained
below 0.4% to secure whiteness. White cement is largely used to increase the aesthetic
value of a construction. It is preferred for tiles and flooring works. This cement costs
more than grey cement.
Easily workable.
Good moisture-resistant.
1.5 WATER
Combining water with a cementitious material forms a cement paste by the process of hydration.
The cement paste glues the aggregate together, fills voids within it, and makes it flow more freely.
15 | P a g e
A lower water-to-cement ratio yields a stronger, more durable concrete, whereas more water gives
a free-flowing concrete with a higher slump. Impure water used to make concrete can cause
problems when setting or in causing premature failure of the structure.
Hydration involves many different reactions, often occurring at the same time. As the reactions
proceed, the products of the cement hydration process gradually bond together the individual sand
and gravel particles and other components of the concrete to form a solid mass
Source of water- Non-potable water and water resulting from concrete production operations can
be used as mixing water in concrete provided the acceptance criteria given in ASTM C1602 are
met. Water recovered from processes of concrete production includes: (1) wash water from mixers
or that was a part of a concrete mixture, (2) water collected in a basin as a result of storm water
runoff at a concrete production facility, or (3) other water that contains quantities of concrete
ingredients. The solids content in recycled water generally ranges from 2 to 10 percent. The
maximum permitted solids content for water to be used in concrete is 50,000 parts per million, or 5
percent, of the total mixing water and should be tested in accordance with ASTM C1603.
Sl.
No.
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
Tested as per
IS 3025(Part 18)
IS 3025(Part 18)
IS 3025(Part 24)
IS 3025(Part 32)
IS 3025(Part 17)
Limits, Max
200mg/l
3000mg/l
400mg/l
2000mg/l for concrete not containing embedded
steel and 500mg/l for reinforced concrete work
2000mg/l
1. Nominal Mixes
In the past the specifications for concrete prescribed the proportions of cement, fine and
coarse aggregates. These mixes of fixed cement-aggregate ratio which ensures adequate
strength are termed nominal mixes. These offer simplicity and under normal
circumstances, have a margin of strength above that specified. However, due to the
variability of mix ingredients the nominal concrete for a given workability varies widely in
strength.
2. Standard mixes
The nominal mixes of fixed cement-aggregate ratio (by volume) vary widely in strength
and may result in under- or over-rich mixes. For this reason, the minimum compressive
strength has been included in many specifications. These mixes are termed standard mixes.
IS 456-2000 has designated the concrete mixes into a number of grades as M10, M15,
M20, M25, M30, M35 and M40. In this designation the letter M refers to the mix and the
number to the specified 28 day cube strength of mix in N/mm2. The mixes of grades M10,
M15, M20 and M25 correspond approximately to the mix proportions (1:3:6), (1:2:4),
(1:1.5:3) and (1:1:2) respectively. The major drawback of such concrete is that the standard
ratios specified for different grades of concrete remain constant irrespective of the quality
and type of ingredients. Thus this type of concrete are seldom used in practice, specially
for higher grades of concrete (M25 and above). For such type of concrete, mix proportion
designed specifically for the type and properties of its ingredients are to be used as
described below.
3. Designed Mixes (IS 10262, 2009)
In these mixes the performance of the concrete is specified by the designer but the mix
proportions are determined by the producer of concrete, except that the minimum cement
content can be laid down. This is most rational approach to the selection of mix
proportions with specific materials in mind possessing more or less unique characteristics.
The approach results in the production of concrete with the appropriate properties most
economically. However, the designed mix does not serve as a guide since this does not
guarantee the correct mix proportions for the prescribed performance.
For the concrete with undemanding performance nominal or standard mixes (prescribed in
the codes by quantities of dry ingredients per cubic meter and by slump) may be used only
for very small jobs, when the 28-day strength of concrete does not exceed 30 N/mm 2. No
control testing is necessary reliance being placed on the masses of the ingredients.
1. Compressive strength
It is one of the most important properties of concrete and influences many other
describable properties of the hardened concrete. The mean compressive strength required
at a specific age, usually 28 days, determines the nominal water-cement ratio of the mix.
The other factor affecting the strength of concrete at a given age and cured at a prescribed
temperature is the degree of compaction. According to Abrahams law the strength of fully
compacted concrete is inversely proportional to the water-cement ratio.
2. Workability
The degree of workability required depends on three factors. These are the size of the
section to be concreted, the amount of reinforcement, and the method of compaction to be
used. For the narrow and complicated section with numerous corners or inaccessible parts,
the concrete must have a high workability so that full compaction can be achieved with a
reasonable amount of effort. This also applies to the embedded steel sections. The desired
workability depends on the compacting equipment available at the site.
3. Durability
The durability of concrete is its resistance to the aggressive environmental conditions.
High strength concrete is generally more durable than low strength concrete. In the
situations when the high strength is not necessary but the conditions of exposure are such
that high durability is vital, the durability requirement will determine the water-cement
ratio to be used.
4. Maximum nominal size of aggregate
In general, larger the maximum size of aggregate, smaller is the cement requirement for a
particular water-cement ratio, because the workability of concrete increases with increase
in maximum size of the aggregate. However, the compressive strength tends to increase
with the decrease in size of aggregate.
IS 456:2000 and IS 1343:1980 recommend that the nominal size of the aggregate should
be as large as possible.
5. Grading and type of aggregate
The grading of aggregate influences the mix proportions for a specified workability and
water-cement ratio. Coarser the grading leaner will be mix which can be used. Very lean
mix is not desirable since it does not contain enough finer material to make the concrete
cohesive.
18 | P a g e
The type of aggregate influences strongly the aggregate-cement ratio for the desired
workability and stipulated water cement ratio. An important feature of a satisfactory
aggregate is the uniformity of the grading which can be achieved by mixing different size
fractions.
6. Quality Control
The degree of control can be estimated statistically by the variations in test results. The
variation in strength results from the variations in the properties of the mix ingredients and
lack of control of accuracy in batching, mixing, placing, curing and testing. The lower the
difference between the mean and minimum strengths of the mix lower will be the cementcontent required. The factor controlling this difference is termed as quality .
A slump test is a method used to determine the consistency of concrete. The consistency,
or stiffness, indicates how much water has been used in the mix. The stiffness of the
concrete mix should be matched to the requirements for the finished product quality
Concrete Slump Test
The concrete slump test is used for the measurement of a property of fresh concrete. The
test is an empirical test that measures the workability of fresh concrete. More specifically,
it measures consistency between batches. The test is popular due to the simplicity of
apparatus used and simple procedure.
19 | P a g e
Principle
The slump test result is a measure of the behavior of a compacted inverted cone of
concrete under the action of gravity. It measures the consistency or the wetness of
concrete.
Types of Slump
The slumped concrete takes various shapes, and according to the profile of slumped
concrete, the slump is termed as;
1. Collapse Slump
2. Shear Slump
3. True Slump
Collapse Slump
In a collapse slump the concrete collapses completely. A collapse slump will generally
mean that the mix is too wet or that it is a high workability mix, for which slump test is not
appropriate.
Shear Slump
In a shear slump the top portion of the concrete shears off and slips sideway or if one-half
of the cone slides down an inclined plane, the slump is said to be a shear slump.
1. If a shear or collapse slump is achieved, a fresh sample should be taken and the test
is repeated.
2. If the shear slump persists, as may the case with harsh mixes, this is an indication
of lack of cohesion of the mix.
True Slump
In a true slump the concrete simply subsides, keeping more or less to shape
1. This is the only slump which is used in various tests.
2. Mixes of stiff consistence have a Zero slump, so that in the rather dry range no
variation can be detected between mixes of different workability.
20 | P a g e
However , in a lean mix with a tendency to harshness, a true slump can easily change to
the shear slump type or even to collapse, and widely different values of slump can be
obtained in different samples from the same mix; thus, the slump test is unreliable for lean
mixes.
1.7.1 Applications of Slump Test
1. The slump test is used to ensure uniformity for different batches of similar concrete
under field conditions and to ascertain the effects of plasticizers on their
introduction.
2. This test is very useful on site as a check on the day-to-day or hour- to-hour
variation in the materials being fed into the mixer. An increase in slump may mean,
for instance, that the moisture content of aggregate has unexpectedly increases.
3. Other cause would be a change in the grading of the aggregate, such as a deficiency
of sand.
4. Too high or too low a slump gives immediate warning and enables the mixer
operator to remedy the situation.
5. This application of slump test as well as its simplicity is responsible for its
widespread use.
Degree of
workability
Very low
21 | P a g e
Slump
Compacting
Use for which concrete is suitable
Mm
In
0-25
0-1
Factor
0.78
operated machines.
Low
25-50
Medium
High
50-100
100-175
1-2
2-4
4-7
0.85
0.92
Medium
workability
mixes;
manually compacted flat slabs
using crushed aggregates. Normal
reinforced
concrete
manually
compacted and heavily reinforced
sections with vibrations.
0.95
placing, and curing; and to overcome certain emergencies during concrete operations.
Successful use of admixtures depends on the use of appropriate methods of batching and
concreting. Most admixtures are supplied in ready-to-use liquid form and are added to the
concrete at the plant or at the jobsite. Certain admixtures, such as pigments, expansive
agents, and pumping aids are used only in extremely small amounts and are usually
batched by hand from premeasured containers.
The effectiveness of an admixture depends on several factors including: type and amount
of cement, water content, mixing time, slump, and temperatures of the concrete and air.
Sometimes, effects similar to those achieved through the addition of admixtures can be
achieved by altering the concrete mixture-reducing the water-cement ratio, adding
additional cement, using a different type of cement, or changing the aggregate and
aggregate gradation.
1.8.1 Functions of admixtures
Admixtures are classed according to function. There are five distinct classes of
chemical admixtures: air-entraining, water-reducing, retarding, accelerating, and
plasticizers. All other varieties of admixtures fall into the specialty category whose
functions include corrosion inhibition, shrinkage reduction, alkali-silica reactivity
reduction, workability enhancement, bonding, damp proofing, and coloring. Airentraining admixtures are used to purposely place microscopic air bubbles into the
concrete.
Water-reducing admixtures usually reduce the required water content for a
concrete mixture by about 5 to 10 percent. Consequently, concrete containing a
water-reducing admixture needs less water to reach a required slump than untreated
concrete. The treated concrete can have a lower water-cement ratio. This usually
indicates that a higher strength concrete can be produced without increasing the
amount of cement. Recent advancements in admixture technology have led to the
development of mid-range water reducers. These admixtures reduce water content
by at least 8 percent and tend to be more stable over a wider range of temperatures.
Mid-range water reducers provide more consistent setting times than standard
water reducers.
Retarding admixtures which slow the setting rate of concrete are used to counteract the
accelerating effect of hot weather on concrete setting. High temperatures often cause an
increased rate of hardening which makes placing and finishing difficult. Retarders keep
concrete workable during placement and delay the initial set of concrete. Most retarders
also function as water reducers and may entrain some air in concrete.
Accelerating admixtures increase the rate of early strength development; reduce the time
required for proper curing and protection, and speed up the start of finishing operations.
Accelerating admixtures are especially useful for modifying the properties of concrete in
cold weather.
Super plasticizers, also known as plasticizers or high-range water reducers (HRWR),
reduce water content by 12 to 30 percent and can be added to concrete with a low-tonormal slump and water-cement ratio to make high-slump flowing concrete. Flowing
concrete is a highly fluid but workable concrete that can be placed with little or no
23 | P a g e
2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
LABORATORY TESTS:-
25 | P a g e
26 | P a g e
2) Separation of flaky materials: Each piece shall be gauged in turn for thickness on a
metal gauge of the pattern in bulk on sieves having elongated slots. The width of
the slot used in the gauge or sieve shall be of the dimensions for the appropriate
size of material.
3) Weighting of flaky material: The total amount passing the gauge shall be weighed
to an accuracy of at least 0.1%.
TEST SAMPLE:
200 pieces of aggregate are taken and then weighted. Then the aggregates are sieved with
the mentioned sieves.
THEORY:
Elongation Index of an aggregation is the percentage by weight of particles whose greatest
dimension (length) is greater than one and four-fifth times their mean dimension. It is
measured on particles passing through mesh size of 63mm and retained on mesh size of
6.3m. Determination of Elongation Index of coarse aggregate is explained below.
PROCEDURE:
27 | P a g e
1. Take enough quantity of dry blended sample so that at least 200pieces of any
fraction is present. This is not applicable for the biggest and smallest size.
2. Sieve the blended sample through all the sieves mentioned above starting from the
largest sieve i.e. 63mm.
3. Separate all the individual fractions- 63mm to 50mm, 50mm to 40mm, 40mm to
25mm, 25mm to 16mm, 16mm to 12.5mm, 12.5mm to 10mm and 10mm to
6.3mm.
4. Take the entire fraction separately; gauge them one by one through the
corresponding slot provided in the gauge. Keep the particles retained by the length
separately. The aim should be to retain as much as possible to avoid testing bias.
5. Weigh the particles retained on length gauge.
6. Elongation Index is the total weight of the material retained on the various length
gauges, expressed as a percentage of the total weight of the sample gauged.
29 | P a g e
30 | P a g e
PROCEDURE:
Following procedures are adopted to find out standard consistency.
Take 350gm of cement and prepare a paste of weight quantity of water (28% by weight of
cement) for first trial. The paste must be prepared in a standard manner and filled into the
vacate mould within 2-3 minute. After filling completely, the mould is shaken to expel air.
A standard plunger, 10mm diameter, 50mm long is attached is brought down to touch the
surface of the paste in the test block and quickly released allowing it to sink into the paste
by its own weight. Take the reading by noting the depth of penetration of the plunger.
Conduct second trial with higher and higher water cement ratios till such time the plunger
penetrates for a depth of 40-50mm from top. The particular percentage of water which
allows the plunger to penetrate to a depth of 40-50mm from the top is known as the
percentage of water required to produce a cement paste of standard consistency. This
percentage of water required to produce cement paste of standard consistency. This
percentage is denoted as P. This test is required to conduct at constant temperature of 29
degree and constant humidity of 90%.
31 | P a g e
REMARKS:
This test is done to determine the minimum water to be mixed with cement for setting.
32 | P a g e
The same Vicat apparatus is used in this test also. The procedure for the test is as
follows--1) The cement paste is prepared as above and it is filled in the Vicat mould.
2) The needle with annular collar is attached to the moving rod of the Vicat apparatus.
This needle has a sharp point projection at the centre.
3) The needle is then gently released. The time at which the needle makes an
impression on test sample and collar fails to do so is noted. This is final setting
time.
33 | P a g e
APARATUS
Compression testing machine.
Preparation of cube specimenThe proportions of material are calculated mixed and placed in the specimen.
Mixing-Mixing of concrete is done by hand or in machine.
PROCEDURE
Mix the cement and fine aggregate on a water tight none-absorbent platform until
the mixture is thoroughly blended and is of uniform color.
Add the coarse aggregate and mix with cement and fine aggregate until the coarse
aggregate is uniformly distributed throughout the batch.
Add water and mix it until the concrete appears to be homogeneous and of the
desired consistency.
Add admixtures of the desired percentage by weight and mix it thoroughly with the
mix.
SAMPLING
Compact each layer with not less than 35 strokes per layer using a tamping rod.
34 | P a g e
2.4.4.1 CURINGThe test specimens are stored in moist air for 24hours and after this period the specimens
are marked and removed from the moulds and kept submerged in clear fresh water until
taken out prior to test.
PRECAUTIONSThe water for curing should be clean and should be tested before use.
PROCEDURE
Remove the specimen from water after specified curing time and wipe out excess
water from the surface.
Place the specimen in the machine in such a manner that the load shall be applied
to the opposite sides of the cube cast.
Rotate the movable portion gently by hand so that it touches the top surface of the
specimen.
Apply the load gradually without shock and continuously till the specimen fails
Group
35 | P a g e
Grade
Designation
(1)
Ordinary Concrete
Standard Concrete
High Strength
Concrete
(2)
M 10
M 15
M 20
M 25
M 30
M 35
M 40
M 45
M 50
M 55
M 60
M 65
M 70
M 75
(3)
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
M 80
80
Top diameter=10cm
Height=30cm
The mould shall be constructed of metal of at least 1.6 mm thickness and the top and
bottom shall be open and at right angles to the axis of the cone. The mould shall have a
smooth internal surface. It shall be provided with suitable foot pieces and also handles to
facilitate lifting it from the moulded concrete test specimen in a vertical direction as
required by the test. A mould provided with a suitable guide attachment may be used.
Tamping rod - The tamping rod shall be of steel or other suitable material, 16 mm in
diameter 0.6 m long.
PROCEDURE
The internal surface of the mould shall be thoroughly cleaned and freed from superfluous
moisture and any set concrete before commencing the test. The mould shall be placed on a
smooth, horizontal, rigid and non-absorbent surface, such as a carefully leveled metal
plate, the mould being firmly held in place while it is being filled. The mould shall be
filled in four layers, each approximately one-quarter of the height of the mould. Each layer
shall be tamped with twenty-five strokes of the rounded end of the tamping rod. The
strokes shall be distributed in a uniform manner over the cross-section of the mould and
for the second and subsequent layers shall penetrate in the underlying layer. The bottom
layer shall be tamped throughout its depth. After the top layer has been tamped, the
concrete shall be struck off level with a trowel or the tamping rod, so that the mould is
exactly filled. Any mortar which may have leaked out between the mould and the base
plate shall be cleaned away. The mould shall be removed from the concrete immediately
by raising it slowly and carefully in a vertical direction. This allows the concrete to subside
and the slump shall be measured immediately by determining the difference between the
height of the mould and that of the highest point of the specimen being tested. The above
operations shall be carried out at a place free from vibration or shock, and within a period
of two minutes after sampling.
SLUMP
Workability of concrete in accordance with IS 1199
Placing Conditions
Degree of Workability
(1)
(2)
Blinding Concrete;
Shallow sections;
Pavements using pavers
Very low
Low
Mass concrete;
Lightly reinforced sections in
slab,beams,walls,columns;
Floors;
Hand placed pavements;
37 | P a g e
Slump(mm)
(3)
See Clause 7.1.1 of
IS 456:2000
25-75
Canal lining;
Strip footing;
Heavily reinforced concrete in
slabs,beams,walls,columns;
Slip form work;
Pumped concrete
Trench fill;
In-situ piling
Medium
50-100
Medium
75-100
High
100-50
See Clause 7.1.2 of
Tremie concrete
Very High
IS 456:2000
The slump measured shall be recorded in terms of millimeters of subsidence of the
specimen during the test. Any slump specimen which collapses or shears off laterally gives
incorrect result and if this occurs the test shall be repeated with another sample. If in the
repeat test also, the specimen should shear, the slump shall be measured and the fact that
the specimen sheared, shall be recorded.
D
C( AB)
A = weight (gm) of vessel containing sample and filled with distilled water.
B = weight (gm) of vessel filled with distilled water only.
C = weight (gm) of saturated surface-dry sample.
D= weight (gm) of oven-dry sample.
38 | P a g e
D
C( AB)
288
= 290(13501160)
= 2.88
SIZE OF AGGREGATE 20mm
Weight of aggregate
Weight of vessel + sample + water (A)
Weight of vessel + water (B)
Weight of saturated surface dry aggregate(C)
Weight of oven dry aggregate (D)
Specific gravity =
= 300gm
= 1345gm
= 1160gm
= 290gm
= 287gm
D
C( AB)
287
290(13451160)
= 2.74
39 | P a g e
D
C( AB)
= 300gm
= 1340gm
= 1160gm
= 290gm
= 286gm
286
290(13401160)
= 2.6
3.1.2 FLAKINESS AND ELONGATION TEST:OBSERVATION TABLE:Passing
Retained
through IS on IS sieve
sieve
(mm)
(mm)
Wt
of Thickness
fraction of gauge,
200 pieces size (mm)
(gm)
wt
of
aggregate
passing
thickness
gauge(gm)
Length
gauge,
size
(mm)
Wt
of
aggregate
Retained
On length
Gauge(gm)
40
31.5
2400
19.50
510
58
522
25
20
2020
13.50
365
40.5
370
12.5
10
1300
6.75
247
20.2
243
100
(2400+2020+1300)
= 19.61
Elongation index = (522+370+243) x
100
(2400+2020+1300)
=19.84
RESULT:
The Elongation Index for the given sample= 19.84%
The Flakiness Index for the given sample = 19.61%
OBSERVATION TABLE
Weight of aggregate taken=5000 gm
40 | P a g e
Weight
of
passing(gm)
4780
2000
1100
20
Weight
of
passing(gm)
5000
4800
1600
130
Weight
of
passing(gm)
4810
2405
510
10
95.6
40
22
0.4
100
96
32
2.6
41 | P a g e
96.2
48.1
10.1
0.2
IS Sieve
Designatio
n
COARSE AGGREGATES
(Clause 4.1 and 4.2 of IS 383:1970)
Percentage passing for single sized Aggregate of
nominal size
12.5m
m
(6)
-
10m
m
(7)
-
63mm
63mm
(2)
100
85 to
100
40mm
0 to 30
0 to5
100
85 to
100
20mm
100
85 to
100
0 to
20
16mm
100
85 to
100
12.5mm
100
85 to
100
10mm
0 to 5
0 to 5
0 to
20
0 to
30
0 to 45
4.75mm
0 to 5
0 to 5
2.36mm
(1)
80mm
100
95 to
100
95 to
100
30 to
70
100
100
90 to
100
100
10 to
35
0 to10
85 to
100
0 to
20
0 to 5
25 to
55
0 to
10
30 to
70
0 to
10
0 to 10
0 to 5
42 | P a g e
20mm
10mm
90 to
100
40 to
85
Range
Actual
Range
Actual
Range
Actual
40
95-100
97.5
100
100
100
20
30-20
95-100
33
100
12.5
10
10-35
25-55
3.8
40-85
100
4.75
0-5
0-10
1.2
0-10
40
Range (%)
95-100
Actual (%)
99.75
20
30-70
36.5
12.5
10
10-35
13
4.75
0-5
4.96
43 | P a g e
Remark
Satisfactory as per
IS 383, 1970
Specific gravity =
D
C( AB)
A = weight (gm) of vessel containing sample and filled with distilled water.
B = weight (gm) of vessel filled with distilled water only.
C = weight (gm) of saturated surface-dry sample.
D= weight (gm) of oven-dry sample.
Weight of sample taken (C)
Weight of vessel + water (B)
Weight of vessel + water + sand (A)
Weight of dry sand (D)
D
Specific gravity = C( AB)
=200gm
= 1010gm
= 1135gm
= 185gm
185
= 200(11351010)
= 2.47
RESULT:
Hence the specific gravity of the soil sample is 2.47
Sieve analysis
Wt
retained % wt retained
4.75 mm
(gm)
25 gm
Cumulative % % finer
wt
5 retained
95
2.36 mm
15 gm
92
1.18 mm
97 gm
19.4
27.4
72.6
0.6 mm
97 gm
19.4
46.8
53.2
0.3 mm
160 gm
32
78.8
21.2
0.15 mm
85 gm
17
95.8
4.2
Pan
18 gm
3.6
99.4
0.6
Sieve Analysis
Sieve Analysis
Percentage Finner %
10
0.1
Particle Size in mm
45 | P a g e
0.01
Sieving
FINE AGGREGATES
(Clause 4.3 of IS 383:1970)
IS Sieve Designation
Grading
Zone I
Grading Zone IV
100mm
100
100
100
100
4.75mm
90-100
90-100
90-100
95-100
2.36mm
60-95
75-100
85-100
95-100
1.18mm
30-70
55-90
75-100
90-100
600micron
15-34
35-59
60-79
80-100
300micron
5-20
8-30
12-40
15-50
150micron
0-10
0-10
0-10
0-15
RESULT
Fineness modulus =
261.8
100
=2.618
OBSERVATION TABLE
Weight of cement taken = 400gm
Percentage of weight 25
1 of water (%)
28
31
34
35
36
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
15
15
40
40
15
15
RESULT
Consistency of cement = 36% by weight of water.
47 | P a g e
OBSERVATION
Weight of cement taken = 400gm
Weight of water taken = 0.85 x water obtained from standard consistency x weight of
cement
= 0.85 x 0.36 x 400
= 122.4ml
Time in minutes
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
47
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
Height
not 0
penetrated (mm)
RESULT
Initial setting time is 47 minutes.
48 | P a g e
Tests performed
Specific gravity
aggregate
Results
of
Permissible limits
coarse
Size2.6-2.9
40mm
20mm
10mm
2.88
2.74
2.6
Elongation Index
Flakiness Index
19.84 %
19.61 %
3
4
2.47
Zone II
Consistency Test
36% by weight of
water
47 minutes
49 | P a g e
40 % combining
both the index.
Minimum
minutes
30
:
:
:
:
:
M35
Under water pile foundation.
OPC 43 Grade
40mm
340 kg/m3 (As per Table 5 of
IS 456:2000)
:
0.45 (As per Table 5 of
IS 456:2000)
: High (as per Clause 7.1 of IS 456, 2000)
:
150mm
:
Moderate (As per table 3 of
IS 456:2000)
:
:
Crushed Stone
NIL
:
3.15 (Assuming Standard value)
:
2.88
:
2.47
: Zone II (As per table 4 of IS 383, 1970)
Target Strength:_
Target strength (fck) = Ch. Strength (fck) + 1.65 X Standard Deviation(s)
= 35 + 1.65 X 5.0,
= 43.25 N/mm2
(* Note: - The values of standard deviation is taken from table: 1 of I.S:10262-2009)
Selection of Water-Cement Ratio:Let, water cement ratio = 0.37, which is less than 0.50; hence O.K.
(Where, 0.50 is the maximum water cement ratio required for R.C.C. under
moderate exposure as per Table 5 of I.S.456, 2000.
50 | P a g e
Selection of Water Content: From Table: 2 of I.S: 10256-2009, for 40mm nominal maximum size of coarse aggregate;
Water content per m3 of concrete = 165 kg = 165 Lit.
However, since the above value is valid for a slump range of 25 50 mm; hence let
us increase the water content @ 3% per 25mm increase in the slump value.
Thus, estimated water content for 100mm slump = 166 + (12/100) x165
= 185 lit.
Cement Content:W/C Ratio = 0.35
Water = 185 kg.
Hence, Cement content = (185 / 0.37) = 528 kg
Coarse Aggregate & Fine Aggregate Content:From Table: 3 of I.S:10262-2009, volume of coarse aggregate per unit volume of
total aggregate corresponding to 40mm nominal max. size, fine aggregate of zone II and
with a water cement ratio of 0.5 = 0.71.
However, in the present case; since the water cement ratio is 0.35, hence
increasing the volume of C.A. proportionally (@ -/+ 0.01 per +/- 0.05 change in W/C
ratio); we get,
Corrected proportion of volume of C.A. per unit volume of total aggregate = 0.74
Therefore, proportion of volume of F.A. per unit volume of total aggregate
= 1 0.74 = 0.26
Mix Calculation:a) Volume of concrete
= 1 m3
b) Volume of cement
c) Volume of water
e) Mass of C.A.
= (Volume of all in aggregate x proportion of volume of
C.A. per unit volume of total aggregate x Sp. Gr. of C.A. x 1000)
= (0.647 x 0.74 x 2.88 x 1000) = 1378 Kg
f) Mass of F.A.
= (Volume of all in aggregate x proportion of volume of
F.A. per unit volume of total aggregate x Sp. Gr. of F.A. x 1000)
= (0.647 x 0.26 x 2.47 x 1000) = 416 Kg
3.1 Mix proportions for Trial No 1
Water Cement ratio = 0.35
Water
= 185 Kg
Cement
= 528 Kg
Fine Aggregate
= 416 Kg
Coarse Aggregate = 1378 kg
Two more such trials are done by varying the W/C ratio by (+/-) 5 % and the respective proportions
of different materials are calculated and tabulated as described below.
b)
52 | P a g e
Volume of cement
c) Volume of water
f) Mass of F.A.
= (Volume of all in aggregate x proportion of volume of
F.A. per unit volume of total aggregate x Sp. Gr. of F.A. x 1000)
= (0.637 x 0.25 x 2.47 x 1000) = 394 Kg
Thus,
Water Cement ratio = 0.33
Water
= 185 Kg
Cement
= 560 Kg
Fine Aggregate
= 394 kg
Coarse Aggregate
= 1376 Kg
Ratio of cement: Fine aggregate: Coarse aggregate =1:0.70: 2.46
Result of Slump test = 53mm
3.3 Mix proportions for Trial No 3
Take,
Therefore,
b)Volume of cement
53 | P a g e
c) Volume of water
b) Mass of F.A.
= (Volume of all in aggregate x proportion of volume of
F.A. per unit volume of total aggregate x Sp. Gr. of F.A. x 1000)
= (0.656 x 0.266 2.47 x 1000) = 431 Kg
Thus, Water Cement ratio = 0.37
Water
= 185 Kg
Cement
= 500 Kg
Fine Aggregate
= 431 kg
Coarse Aggregate
= 1387 Kg
Ratio of cement: Fine aggregate: Coarse aggregate =1: 0.862: 2.774
Result of Slump test = 82mm
= 1 m3
b) Volume of cement
c) Volume of water
g) Mass of F.A.
= (Volume of all in aggregate x proportion of volume of
F.A. per unit volume of total aggregate x Sp. Gr. of F.A. x 1000)
= (0.734 x 0.26 x 2.47 x 1000) = 471 Kg
55 | P a g e
Also, From Table: 3 of I.S:10262-2009, volume of coarse aggregate per unit volume of
total aggregate corresponding to 40mm nominal max. size, fine aggregate of zone II and
with a water cement ratio of 0.5 = 0.71.
However, in the present case; since the water cement ratio is 0.33, hence increasing the
volume of C.A. proportionally (@ -/+ 0.01 per +/- 0.05 change in W/C ratio); we get,
Corrected proportion of volume of C.A. per unit volume of total aggregate = 0.75
Therefore, proportion of volume of F.A. per unit volume of total aggregate
= 1 0.75= 0.25
Now, re-calculating the quantities of other materials per m3 of concrete, we get;
a)
Volume of concrete
b) Volume of cement
=1 m3
c) Volume of water
g) Mass of F.A.
= (Volume of all in aggregate x proportion of volume of
F.A. per unit volume of total aggregate x Sp. Gr. of F.A. x 1000)
= (0.728 x 0.25 x 2.47 x 1000) = 450 Kg
Thus, Water Cement ratio = 0.33
Water
= 139 Kg
Cement
= 420 Kg
Fine Aggregate
= 450 kg
Coarse Aggregate
= 1573 Kg
Ratio of cement: Fine aggregate: Coarse aggregate =1:1.07: 3.74
Result of Slump test = 138 mm
3.6 Mix proportions for Trial No 6
Chemical admixture used: 1.5 % admixture
Take,
56 | P a g e
Therefore,
Water
Cement
= 139 Kg
= 376 Kg
Also, From Table: 3 of I.S:10262-2009, volume of coarse aggregate per unit volume of
total aggregate corresponding to 40mm nominal max. size, fine aggregate of zone II and
with a water cement ratio of 0.5 = 0.71.
However, in the present case; since the water cement ratio is 0.37, hence increasing the
volume of C.A. proportionally (@ -/+ 0.01 per +/- 0.05 change in W/C ratio); we get,
Corrected proportion of volume of C.A. per unit volume of total aggregate = 0.734
Therefore, proportion of volume of F.A. per unit volume of total aggregate
= 1 0.734= 0.266
Now, re-calculating the quantities of other materials per m 3 of concrete, we get;
a) Volume of concrete =1 m3
c) Volume of water
g)
Mass of F.A.
= (Volume of all in aggregate x proportion of volume of
F.A. per unit volume of total aggregate x Sp. Gr. of F.A. x 1000)
= (0.74x 0.266 2.47 x 1000) = 486 Kg
57 | P a g e
%
admixtur
e
Trial No.
Quantity per
m3 of
concrete
Proportion
Quantity per
m3 of
concrete
Proportion
Quantity per
m3 of
concrete
Proportion
Quantity
per m3 of
concrete
Proportion
Quantity
per m3 of
concrete
Quantity
per m3 of
concrete
Water
(liters)
Cement
( kg )
F.A.
C.A.
185
528
416
1378
---
0.79
2.61
185
560
394
1376
---
0.70
2.46
185
500
431
1387
---
0.862
2.774
W/C
Ratio
0.35
Observe
d slump
(mm)
70
0
0.33
53
0
0.37
82
1.
14
139
397
471
1564
---
1.86
3.93
0.35
1.
139
420
450
1573
---
1.07
3.74
139
376
486
1565
---
1.29
3.74
0.33
38
1.
15
0.37
Target
strength
N/mm2
M35
43.25
Water
cement
ratio
Concrete
proportion
%
admixture
0.37
1:1.29:4.16
1.5
CONCLUSION
58 | P a g e
Compressive
strength
At 7 days At 28 days
(N/mm2) (N/mm2)
24.5
37.5
Observed
Slump
(In mm)
153
59 | P a g e