Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
: (
1
:(
2 A
14 40
)
90
1 ~ 10
1. Read the passage and fill in the blank with ONE word from
the passage.2 points
A psychology professor spent several decades studying
the fixed mindset entity theory. She refers to people who
view talent as a quality they either possess or lack as
having a fixed mindset. People with a growth mindset,
in contrast, enjoy challenges, strive to learn, and
consistently see potential to develop new skills.
Now Carol Dweck, the psychology professor, is extending
her work on mindset beyond individuals. Can an organization,
like an individual, have a fixed or a growth mindset? If so,
how can managers help organizations embrace a growth
mindset? To explore this issue, she conducted surveys and
found that often top management must drive the change; for
instance, a new CEO might focus on maximizing employees
potential. Dweck points to one emblematic growth mindset
CEO who hired according to runway, not pedigree, preferring
big state university graduates and military veterans to Ivy
Leaguers, and spent thousands of hours grooming and coaching
employees on his executive team.
As this CEOs example shows, one area in which
mindset is especially important is hiring. Fixed mindset
organizations reflexively look outside their companies,
while growth mindset organizations are likely to hire from
within their ranks. Focusing on
is not as
effective as looking for people who love challenges, who
want to grow, and who want to collaborate, Dweck says.
Some companies appear to be making such a shift; these
companies have recently begun hiring more people who
have proven that they are capable independent learners.
Despite the survey results, not all employees will be happier
in growth mindset organizations, Dweck acknowledges. In
general, though, the early evidence suggests that organizations
focused on employees capacity for growth will experience
significant advantages.
(7
The original text has been adapted to suit the students English
proficiency levels. (A) shows how input is simplified through
2 )
. Therefore, option
D of item 3 needs to be revised or item 3 needs to be discarded.
Item 17 has a problem with its
: No one
from the upper group and lower group chose option B, and
many upper group students incorrectly chose option C.
(7
3 )
when
7. Read the passage and fill in each blank with ONE word.
Write your answers in the correct order.2 points
A glottal stop is the sound that occurs when the vocal
cords are held tightly together. In many accents of English, a
glottal stop is often realized as a(n)
of /t/
in the words given in (1).
(1) Batman
/t/
butler
/t/
catnap
/t/
atlas
/t/
attraction
/t/
patrol
/t/
The data given in (1) and (2) show that, unlike the /t/
in the words in (1), the /t/ in the words in (2) is in a(n)
(7
4 )
2 points
[PETER reacts scoffingly.]
Jerry: Yes, Peter; friend. Thats the only word for it. I was
heart-shatteringly et cetera to confront my doggy friend
again. I came in the door and advanced, unafraid, to the
center of the entrance hall. The beast was there . . . looking
at me. And, you know, he looked better for his scrape with
the nevermind. I stopped; I looked at him; he looked at me.
I think . . . I think we stayed a long time that way . . . still,
stone-statue . . . just looking at one another. I looked more
into his face than he looked into mine. I mean, I can
concentrate longer at looking into a dogs face than a dog
can concentrate at looking into mine, or into anybody elses
face, for that matter. But during that twenty seconds or two
hours that we looked into each others face, we made
contact. Now, here is what I had wanted to happen: I loved
the dog now, and I wanted him to love me. I had tried to
love, and I had tried to kill, and both had been
unsuccessful by themselves. I hoped . . . and I dont really
know why I expected the dog to understand anything, much
less my motivations . . . I hoped that the dog would
understand. [PETER seems to be hypnotized.] Its just . . .
its just that . . . [JERRY is abnormally tense, now.] . . . its
Commentary
Jerry is desperate to have a meaningful conversation with
Peter who lives in ignorance of the world outside his
with an animal
settled life. Jerry starts to
first in order to deal with Peter.
10. Read the passage and fill in the blank with ONE word.
just that if you cant deal with people, you have to make
a start somewhere. WITH ANIMALS! [Much faster now,
and like a conspirator] Dont you see? A person has to
have some way of dealing with SOMETHING. If not with
people . . . SOMETHING. . . . A dog. It seemed like a
perfectly sensible idea. Man is a dogs best friend,
remember. So: the dog and I looked at each other. I longer
than the dog. And what I saw then has been the same ever
since. Whenever the dog and I see each other we both stop
where we are. The dog and I have attained a compromise;
more of a bargain, really. We neither love nor hurt because
we do not try to reach each other. And, was trying to feed
the dog an act of love? And, perhaps, was the dogs
attempt to bite me not an act of love? If we can so
misunderstand, well then, why have we invented the word
love in the first place?
[There is silence. JERRY moves to Peters bench and
sits down beside him. This is the first time Jerry has sat
down during the play.]
The Story of Jerry and the Dog: the end.
[PETER is silent.]
2 points
The sentences in (1) show three types of NPs: the reflexive
pronoun, the ordinary pronoun, and the proper noun.
(1) a. John likes himself.
b. Mary met him.
c. John came.
The reflexive pronoun should have the antecedent in the
sentence from which it picks up its reference as shown in
(2), with the coindexed NPs indicating the same referent.
This sharply contrasts with the ordinary pronoun and the
proper noun in (3).
(2) a. John i introduced himself i to Mary.
b. *Himself came.
(3) a. John i introduced him j to Mary.
b. John introduced Bill to Mary.
The existence of the antecedent in the sentence, however,
is not a sufficient condition to license the reflexive
pronoun, as shown in (4).
(4) a. *John i thinks that himself i is intelligent.
b. John told Mary i about herself i.
The examples in (2) and (4) show that the reflexive pronoun
that
finds its antecedent in the smallest
contains it. The sentences in (2b) and (4a) are thus
ungrammatical in contrast to those in (2a) and (4b).
Note: * indicates that the sentence is ungrammatical.
(7
5 )
1 ~ 4
Lesson Procedure
Noun-Oriented Expressions
He works hard.
He is a hard worker.
My head aches.
He is very humorous.
He has a good
...
.
.
...
(7
6 )
<A>
Linguistic expressions are often ambiguous, and
homonymy is one source of ambiguity. Homonyms are
words that have different meanings but are pronounced the
same, and may or may not be spelled the same. Another
source of ambiguity is structure. Sometimes, homonymy
creates even more ambiguity in combination with different
structures.
(1) John admires intelligent professors and students.
(2) They are pitchers from America.
(3) Mary observed the man at the bank.
The ambiguity in (1) is created by different structures. The
source of the ambiguity in (2) is homonymy, whereas (3)
is ambiguous due to different structures and homonymy.
<B>
Mary saw Johns nose ring.
<.>
(7
7 )