Sunteți pe pagina 1din 105

Effective. Gentle. Easy.

Enhancing Nasal High Flow Therapy

185048239 REV A 2014 Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited

www.fphcare.com

Introduction
The therapy and
Optiflow Junior

APPENDIX
The therapy and

Optiflow Junior
(CO N C I S E )

Beyond the ICU


Other evidence

Clinical
Definition
What it is
Mechanisms
How it works
Physiological
outcomes
What it does
Clinical outcomes
What it means

Tools
Usage
Pressure
Economics
Optiflow Junior
The R&D journey
Optiflow Junior
Unique features
Videos

Introduction

The therapy and


Optiflow Junior

Overview

Nasal High Flow (NHF) therapy


is being widely adopted in
neonatal and pediatric practice.
Its superceding some
traditional therapies.
Its effective, gentle and easy.
The economic and health
benefits are emerging.
Optiflow Junior enhances
the therapy benefits.

Improved patient care and outcomes

Avoid intubation

NEONATAL
Readmission
ACUITY

Fisher & Paykel Healthcare


customer research
demonstrates that
clinicians want to:

Treat in a noninterventionist manner

LENGTH OF STAY

Shorten length-of-stay
(to free up beds)

Reduce the burden


of educating staff

PEDIATRIC
Readmission
ACUITY

Control costs

Avoid readmission

LENGTH OF STAY

FPH International Medical Director Research 2013.

A therapy arrives...
THE RESPIRATORY CARE CONTINUUM

INVASIVE
VENTILATION

nCPAP

NASAL
HIGH FLOW

OXYGEN
THERAPY

Commercially
available
circa 2001

Momentum has been building

Growing research
Number of NHF papers published from 2000-2013
(Neonatal and Pediatric)
40

Manley et al.
N Engl J Med
2013

35
number of papers

3 Randomised
Controlled Trials
(RCTs)

30

Yoder et al.
Pediatrics
2013

25
20
15

Collins e
t al.
J. Pediat
r.
2013

10
5
0

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

n = 867

Whats
behind the
momentum?
The literature indicates that
the momentum stems from
these therapy attributes:

Effective

Gentle
Easy

NHF therapy benefits

Effective

Gentle
Easy

Similar efficacy
to CPAP
Clinical studies have shown
that nasal high flow has similar
efficacy to nCPAP.1,2,3
* Study populations weighted towards infants >26 weeks gestational age,
post extubation

1 Refs here

1 Manley et al. New Engl J Med. 2013.



2 Yoder et al. Pediatrics. 2013.

3 Collins et al. J Pediatr. 2013.

NHF therapy benefits

Effective

Gentle
Easy

Associated with
reduced escalation
and length of stay
ACUITY

Research in the pediatric population


indicates that NHF may reduce intubation
rates and shorten length of stay.1,2

LENGTH OF STAY
1 Refs here

1 McKiernan et al. J Pediatr. 2010.



2 Schibler et al. Int Care Med. 2011.

NHF therapy benefits

Effective

Gentle
Easy

Less nasal trauma


Three randomized controlled trials
have shown reduced rates of
nasal trauma associated with NHF
compared to nCPAP.1,2,3

1 Refs here

1 Manley et al. New Engl J Med. 2013.



2 Yoder et al. Pediatrics. 2013.

3 Collins et al. J Pediatr. 2013.

NHF therapy benefits

Effective

Gentle
Easy

No significant difference
in adverse events
Clinical studies have concluded that there
appears to be no significant difference in
other serious adverse events such as
pneumothorax when compared to nCPAP.1,2,3

1 Refs here

1 Manley et al. New Engl J Med. 2013.



2 Yoder et al. Pediatrics. 2013.

3 Collins et al. J Pediatr. 2013.

NHF therapy benefits

Effective

Gentle
Easy

Improved bonding
Surveys of practice describe
improved mother infant bonding
with NHF.1,2,3

1 Refs here

1 Hochwald et al. J Neonatal-Perinatal Med. 2010.



2 Hough et al. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011.

3 Ojha et al. Acta Paediatr. 2012.

10

NHF therapy benefits

Effective

Gentle
Easy

Comfortable and
well tolerated
Research and surveys of practice
indicate improved comfort,1 tolerance
and patient satisfaction with NHF.2,3,4

1 Refs here

1 Spentzas et al. J Intensive Care Med. 2009.



2 Hochwald et al. J Neonatal-Perinatal Med. 2010.

3 Hough et al. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011.

4 Ojha et al. Acta Paediatr. 2012.

11

NHF therapy benefits

Effective

Gentle
Easy

Simpler application
Surveys of practice describe
easier application and ongoing
care with NHF.1,2,3

1 Refs here

1 Hochwald et al. J Neonatal-Perinatal Med. 2010.



2 Hough et al. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011.

3 Ojha et al. Acta Paediatr. 2012.

12

NHF therapy benefits

Effective

Gentle
Easy

Empowers parents
Parents have confidence to play a greater
role in their infants care. Parents reported
a preference for NHF in a randomised cross
over trial involving 20 infants.1 These findings
are mirrored in surveys of practice.2,3,4

1 Refs here

1 Klingenburg at al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013.



2 Hochwald et al. J Neonatal-Perinatal Med. 2010.

3 Hough et al. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011.

4 Ojha et al. Acta Paediatr. 2012.

13

NHF therapy benefits

Effective

Gentle
Easy

Loved by caregivers
Surveys of practice describe
improved caregiver satisfaction.1,2,3

1 Refs here

1 Hochwald et al. J Neonatal-Perinatal Med. 2010.



2 Hough et al. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011.

3 Ojha et al. Acta Paediatr. 2012.

14

Summary

Effective

Gentle
Easy

15

ACUITY

Neonatal health economic benefits are emerging

$
LENGTH OF STAY

Avoiding intubation

Reduced risk of nasal trauma

Indication of reduced intubation rates


when used in combination with nCPAP.

Nasal trauma can sometimes result in costly


corrective surgery.

Manley et al (2013) indicated a 7.4 %


reduction (p = 0.12 NS*) in re-intubation
rates when nCPAP could be used as a
rescue therapy after NHF. This was
compared to nCPAP alone.

Clinical studies have shown a 7%2 to 15%1


reduction in nasal trauma compared to nCPAP.

1 Manley et al. New Engl J Med. 2013.


4 Collins et al. Eur J Pediatr. 2013.
5

Yoder et al. Pediatrics. 2013.

Rnnestad et al. Pediatrics. 2005.

NHF reduces risk of nasal mucosa erosion4


which is a possible cause of nosocomial sepsis.5

Loftus et al. Laryngoscope. 1994.


* = Not Significant

16

ACUITY

Pediatric health economic benefits are emerging

LENGTH OF STAY

Avoiding intubation

Reduced length of stay

14 30% reduction in
intubation rate associated
with the introduction of NHF.1,2

2 day median reduction in


PICU length of stay associated
with the introduction of NHF.1,2

1 McKiernan et al. J Pediatr. 2010. 2


Schibler et al. Int Care Med. 2011.

17

Designed to enhance the inherent therapy benefits

Broader
range of
flows

In-built
safety
features

Effective

Enhancing
comfort

Gentle
Easy

Promoting
developmental
care

Simpler
for
caregivers

Further
empowers
parents

18

Where and why Optiflow Junior is being adopted

INVASIVE
VENTILATION

OXYGEN
THERAPY

nCPAP

Effective
Gentle
Easy

19

Improving patient care


and outcomes
Nasal High Flow therapy
is being widely adopted in
neonatal and pediatric practice.
Its superceding some
traditional therapies.
Its effective, gentle and easy.
The economic and health
benefits are emerging.
Optiflow Junior enhances
the therapy benefits.

20

Clinical

Definition
What is it?

Definition of Nasal High Flow

DEFINITION: Delivery of heated and humidified


blended oxygen at optimal flow rates directly
into the nares via a non-sealing nasal cannula.

Blended
gas

Optimal
flow

Heated
and
humidified
gas

Open
system

Context and definition

nCPAP

NHF/Optiflow Junior

Oxygen therapy

Sealed
Heated and humidified
Pressures prescribed
Flows typically
6-10 L/m

Non-sealed
Heated and humidified
Flow capabilities:
Neonatal up to 8 L/m,
Pediatric up to 25 L/m

Non-sealed
Cold, dry medical gas
Flows less than 2 L/m

Clinical

Mechanisms
How it works

Nasal High Flow with Optiflow

Respiratory
Support

Airway
Hydration
Comfort

Respiratory support

REDUCTION OF
DEAD SPACE
Clearance of expired air in
the upper airways1,2

Reduces rebreathing of gas with


high CO2 and depleted O21,2

Increases
alveolar ventilation1,2
1 Mundel T, et al. J Appl Physiol. 2013. 2

Frizzola et al. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011.

Respiratory support

DYNAMIC POSITIVE
AIRWAY PRESSURE

Promotes slow and


deep breathing1,2,3

Increases
alveolar ventilation1

AIRWAY PRESSURE

Breath- and flow-dependent


airway pressure1,2,3

Respiratory
support with
Nasal High
Flow
Unassisted breathing
TIME

1 Mundel T, et al. J Appl Physiol. 2013. 2 Wilkinson et al. J Perinatol. 2008. 3 Arora et al. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012.

Respiratory support

SUPPLEMENTAL
OXYGEN
Accurate delivery of blended,
humidified oxygen1

Enhances confidence in
oxygen administration

Ritchie JE, et al. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011.

Airway hydration

OPTIMAL
HUMIDITY
Enables comfortable delivery
of high flows1
Prevents desiccation of
the airway epithelium2,3

Improves
mucus clearance2
1 Roca O, et al. Respir Care. 2010. 2

Hasani A, et al. Chron Respir Dis. 2008. 3

Chidekel at al. Pulm Med. 2012

Comfort

EASE OF USE
OPEN SYSTEM
No seal required
Patient
comfort1,2

1 Roca O, et al. Respiratory Care. 2010.

2 Spentzas et al. J Intensive Care Med. 2009.

10

Physiological outcomes

In neonates:

In pediatrics:

NHF is associated
with:1,2

NHF is associated with:3,4


Improved breathing pattern.

Clinically similar

work of breathing
compared to
nCPAP.1,2

Rapid unloading of respiratory muscles.


Significant reduction in respiratory effort.
Rapid improvement in respiratory distress.

These effects tend to be more pronounced


with higher flows.

1 Saslow et al. J Perinatol. 2006. 2 deJongh et al. J Perinatol. 2013.


3 Milsi et al. Int Care Med. 2013. 4 Rubin et al. Pediatr Crit Care. 2013.

11

Clinical outcomes

In neonates:1,2,3

In pediatrics:4,5

NHF is similar to nCPAP


in terms of efficacy*

with less nasal trauma

and no significant difference


in other serious adverse
events (e.g. pneumothroax).

NHF is associated with:


Reduced intubation rates.
Reduced PICU

length of stay.

*Study populations weighted towards infants >26 weeks gestational age, post extubation
1 Collins et al. J. Pediatr. 2013. 2 Manley et al. New Engl J Med. 2013. 3
4

McKiernan et al. J Pediatr. 2010. 5

Yoder et al. Pediatrics. 2013.

Schibler et al. Int Care Med. 2011.

12

Tools

Neonatal usage
What flows should I use
for neonatal patients?

Current trends in practice

CURRENT USAGE THEORIES

FLOW
BASED

DOSE BY
WEIGHT

TITRATE
TO EFFECT

(OBSERVATIONAL)

There is direction in the literature to guide


how flow should be set and titrated.

COMBINE
2 AND 3

There are a number of possible approaches


based on current trends in practice.
Deliver a set flow
to all infants

Set flow according


The
following
to infants weight

Set flow and


approaches
have
titrate to effect

some supporting evidence:

1 Refs here

Current trends in practice

CURRENT USAGE THEORIES

FLOW
BASED

Deliver a set flow


to all infants

DOSE BY
WEIGHT

Set flow according


to infants weight

TITRATE
TO EFFECT

(OBSERVATIONAL)

COMBINE
2 AND 3

Set flow and


titrate to effect

Current trends in practice

CURRENT USAGE THEORIES

FLOW
BASED

Deliver a set flow


to all infants
1 Collins et al.

J. Pediatr. 2013.

DOSE BY
WEIGHT

Set flow according


to infants weight
2 Milsi et al.

Int Care Med. 2013.

TITRATE
TO EFFECT

(OBSERVATIONAL)

COMBINE
2 AND 3

Set flow and


titrate to effect
3 Manley et al.

N Engl J Med. 2013.

4 Yoder et al.

Pediatrics. 2013.

Supporting evidence

1 Collins et al.

J. Pediatr. 2013.

FIXED
FLOW

2 Milsi et al.

Int Care Med. 2013.

WEIGHT
BASED

3 Manley et al.

N Engl J Med. 2013.

AT THE
CLINICIANS
DISCRETION

All infants in the NHF


arm of the study
received initial flows
of 8 L/min.*

Infants receiving
flows 2 L/kg/min
demonstrated
rapid unloading of
respiratory muscles.*

Infants in the NHF


arm received either
5 or 6 L/min then flows
were titrated at the
clinicians discretion.*

* Once weaning of therapy


commenced, flows
could be reduced to a
minimum of 4 L/min.

* As of February 2014
there are currently no
RCTs that have evaluated
a l/kg/min approach in
the neonatal population.

* Flows could be titrated to


a minimum of 2 L/min
and a maximum of 6, 7
or 8 L/min based on max
flow of the cannula used.

4 Yoder et al.

Pediatrics. 2013.

COMBINE
2 AND 3

The study recommended


that infants in the NHF
arm receive starting flows
based on weight:
1kg 1.9kg = 3 L/min
2kg - 2.9kg = 4 L/min
3kg = 5 L/min
Flows were then titrated
based on observation and
defined clinical criteria.
* Flows could be increased to
a max of 3 L/min above the
starting flow rate.

A consistent range of usage

Below is a visual summary of the flow ranges used in the 3 RCTs published in 2013.
The studies below use starting flows between 3 and 8 L/min.

NEONATAL

Flow

Guidance
source

Category
description

Collins et al
2013

Less than 32 weeks


gestational age

Manley et al
2013

Premature and
neonatal cannula

10

11

Infant, intermediate
infant cannula
Pediatric cannula

Yoder et al
2013

<2kg
2-3kg
>3kg

KEY:

= Minimum flow

= Starting flow

= Maximum flow

Conclusions
The literature provides a good source of guidance on how to set and titrate flow.
The study by Yoder et al, 2013 provides the most detailed guide to managing nasal high
flow in the context of an RCT. It may be a useful tool in developing your own protocol.

CURRENT USAGE THEORIES

FLOW
BASED

Deliver a set flow


to all infants

DOSE BY
WEIGHT

Set flow according


to infants weight

TITRATE
TO EFFECT

(OBSERVATIONAL)

COMBINE
2 AND 3

Set flow and


titrate to effect

Tools

Pediatric usage
What flows should I use for bigger
babies and pediatric patients?

Pediatric usage

There are no large RCTs in the pediatric

population, however physiological


evidence suggests that flows equal
to or above 2 L/kg/min generate a
clinically relevant pharyngeal pressure,
with improved breathing pattern and
rapid unloading of respiratory muscles.1
It may be useful to think about

setting flow in terms of L/kg/min.


This may help to standardize therapy
across a broad population.
1 Milsi et al. Int Care Med. 2013.

Tools

Pressure
Ive got questions
about pressure

Ive got questions about pressure

Concern
Pressure

Considerations
Clinical data
Designed with in-built
safety features
Proactive monitoring/
management

11

Clinical data

Pressures are
typically low

Similar to nCPAP
The evidence from 3 RCTs, including over 800 babies,
suggests that nasal high flow is associated with a
similar risk of barotrauma compared to nCPAP.1,2,3

Pressures generated

with nasal high flow


are typically between
2 5 cm H20.1,4,5,6

Among infants 28 weeks gestational age HHHFNC [NHF]


appears to have similar efficacy and safety to nCPAP
when applied immediately post extubation or early as initial
non-invasive support for respiratory disfunction. YODER ET AL 2013
1 Collins et al. J Pediatr. 2013.

2 Manley et al. New Engl J Med. 2013.

4 Saslow et al. J Perinatol. 2006.

5 Kubicka et al. Pediatrics. 2008.

Yoder et al. Pediatrics. 2013.

6 Wilkinson et al. J Perinatol. 2008.

12

Designed with in-built safety features

Open
system
Patients vent flow and
pressure around the cannula.
In addition patients can
open their mouths.

Pressure
relief valve
Designed to allow flow and pressure
to vent from the circuit in case of the
unlikely scenario where the prongs
completely occlude the nares and
the mouth is held closed.

13

Proactive monitoring/management

Prong to
nare ratio
Sivieri et al. 20121 demonstrated
the importance of prong to nare
ratio as a key safety feature.

Sizing to approx half the nare limits


the possibility of harmful pressure.
Use of the pressure relief valve is
also mandated.

CHECKLIST
Ensure a clear gap

is visible around
each prong
No forced mouth

closure
Pressure relief valve

in place

Sivieri et al. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012.

14

Summary

Considerations
Clinical data
Similar to nCPAP
Pressures are typically low
Designed with in-built safety features
Open system
Pressure relief valve
Proactive monitoring/management
Prong to nare ratio
No forced mouth closure

15

Tools

Economics
The emerging health
economic benefits

ACUITY

Neonatal health economic benefits are emerging

$
LENGTH OF STAY

Avoiding intubation

Reduced risk of nasal trauma

Indication of reduced intubation rates


when used in combination with nCPAP.

Nasal trauma can sometimes result in costly


corrective surgery.

Manley et al (2013) indicated a 7.4 %


reduction (p = 0.12 NS*) in re-intubation
rates when nCPAP could be used as a
rescue therapy after NHF. This was
compared to nCPAP alone.

Clinical studies have shown a 7%2 to 15%1


reduction in nasal trauma compared to nCPAP.

1 Manley et al. New Engl J Med. 2013.


4 Collins et al. Eur J Pediatr. 2013.
5

Yoder et al. Pediatrics. 2013.

Rnnestad et al. Pediatrics. 2005.

NHF reduces risk of nasal mucosa erosion4


which is a possible cause of nosocomial sepsis.5

Loftus et al. Laryngoscope. 1994.


* = Not Significant

17

ACUITY

Pediatric health economic benefits are emerging

LENGTH OF STAY

Avoiding intubation

Reduced length of stay

14 30% reduction in
intubation rate associated
with the introduction of NHF.1,2

2 day median reduction in


PICU length of stay associated
with the introduction of NHF.1,2

1 McKiernan et al. J Pediatr. 2010. 2


Schibler et al. Int Care Med. 2011.

18

Tools

Economics
Optiflow Junior
v The BC Cannula

Economics: Optiflow v The BC Cannula

$
Product
The BC Cannula

$
Optiflow
Junior

20

Economics: Optiflow v The BC Cannula

$
Patient
outcomes

Product
The BC Cannula

Optiflow
Junior

Specifically
contoured for
Juniors delicate
anatomical
features.

-$?

21

Economics: Optiflow v The BC Cannula

$
Patient
outcomes

Product

Ease of use and


consumables

The BC Cannula

Optiflow
Junior

+
Specifically
contoured for
Juniors delicate
anatomical
features.

-$?

Reduced time
to fit.*
No additional
tape costs.

-$?

* Result found in internal Fisher & Paykel Healthcare testing compared to an F&P BC Cannula.

22

Economics: Optiflow v The BC Cannula

$
Patient
outcomes

Product

Ease of use and


consumables

Therapy

The BC Cannula

Optiflow
Junior

+
Specifically
contoured for
Juniors delicate
anatomical
features.

-$?

+
> Flow range =
broader scope
of therapy from
one device.

Reduced time
to fit.*
No additional
tape costs.

-$?

-$?

* Result found in internal Fisher & Paykel Healthcare testing compared to an F&P BC Cannula.

23

Economics: Optiflow v The BC Cannula

$
Patient
outcomes

Product

Ease of use and


consumables

Developmental care
and patient journey

Therapy

The BC Cannula

Optiflow
Junior

+
Specifically
contoured for
Juniors delicate
anatomical
features.

-$?

+
> Flow range =
broader scope
of therapy from
one device.

Reduced time
to fit.*
No additional
tape costs.

-$?

-$?

Easier developmental care


(e.g. longer circuit).

Softer and more


comfortable:
better patient and
parent experience.

-$?

* Result found in internal Fisher & Paykel Healthcare testing compared to an F&P BC Cannula.

24

Economics: Optiflow v The BC Cannula

$
Patient
outcomes

Product

Ease of use and


consumables

Developmental care
and patient journey

Therapy

Total
system cost

The BC Cannula

Optiflow
Junior

+
Specifically
contoured for
Juniors delicate
anatomical
features.

-$?

+
> Flow range =
broader scope
of therapy from
one device.

Reduced time
to fit.*
No additional
tape costs.

-$?

-$?

= $?
Easier developmental care
(e.g. longer circuit).

Softer and more


comfortable:
better patient and
parent experience.

-$?

= $?

* Result found in internal Fisher & Paykel Healthcare testing compared to an F&P BC Cannula.

25

Tools

Economics
Optiflow Junior
v nCPAP

Economics: Optiflow v nCPAP

$
Product
nCPAP

$
Optiflow
Junior

27

Economics: Optiflow v nCPAP

$
Patient
outcomes

Product
nCPAP

$
Optiflow
Junior

$
1

+
NHF
associated
with reduced
risk of nasal
trauma.1,2,3

+ -$?

Collins et al. J. Pediatr. 2013.

2 Manley et al. New Engl J Med. 2013.

Yoder et al. Pediatrics. 2013.

28

Economics: Optiflow v nCPAP

$
Patient
outcomes

Product

Ease of use and


consumables

nCPAP

$
Optiflow
Junior

$
1

+
NHF
associated
with reduced
risk of nasal
trauma.1,2,3

+ -$?

Faster to apply and


easier for cares.
Improved nursing
satisfaction.1,4,5,6
Easier to train staff
and maintain skill
level.

-$?

2 Manley et al. New Engl J Med. 2013.


3 Yoder et al. Pediatrics. 2013.
4 Hochwald et al. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2010. 5 Hough et al. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011. 6 Ojha et al. Acta Paediatr. 2012.

Collins et al. J Pediatr. 2013.

29

Economics: Optiflow v nCPAP

$
Patient
outcomes

Product

Ease of use and


consumables

Therapy

nCPAP

$
Optiflow
Junior

$
1

+
NHF
associated
with reduced
risk of nasal
trauma.1,2,3

+ -$?

+
Faster to apply and
easier for cares.
Improved nursing
satisfaction.1,4,5,6

Can also be
used to deliver
heated and
humidified
oxygen therapy
(range of flows).

Easier to train staff


and maintain skill
level.

-$?

-$?

2 Manley et al. New Engl J Med. 2013.


3 Yoder et al. Pediatrics. 2013.
4 Hochwald et al. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2010. 5 Hough et al. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011. 6 Ojha et al. Acta Paediatr. 2012.

Collins et al. J Pediatr. 2013.

30

Economics: Optiflow v nCPAP

$
Patient
outcomes

Product

Ease of use and


consumables

Developmental care
and patient journey

Therapy

nCPAP

$
Optiflow
Junior

$
1

+
NHF
associated
with reduced
risk of nasal
trauma.1,2,3

+ -$?

+
Faster to apply and
easier for cares.
Improved nursing
satisfaction.1,4,5,6

-$?

Easier developmental
care, less visually
intrusive. Empowers
parents.

Can also be
used to deliver
heated and
humidified
oxygen therapy
(range of flows).

Easier to train staff


and maintain skill
level.

-$?

Softer and more comfortable: better patient


and parent experience.

-$?

2 Manley et al. New Engl J Med. 2013.


3 Yoder et al. Pediatrics. 2013.
4 Hochwald et al. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2010. 5 Hough et al. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011. 6 Ojha et al. Acta Paediatr. 2012.

Collins et al. J Pediatr. 2013.

31

Economics: Optiflow v nCPAP

$
Patient
outcomes

Product

Ease of use and


consumables

Developmental care
and patient journey

Therapy

Total
system cost

nCPAP

$
Optiflow
Junior

$
1

+
NHF
associated
with reduced
risk of nasal
trauma.1,2,3

+ -$?

+
Faster to apply and
easier for cares.
Improved nursing
satisfaction.1,4,5,6

-$?

-$?

= $?
Easier developmental
care, less visually
intrusive. Empowers
parents.

Can also be
used to deliver
heated and
humidified
oxygen therapy
(range of flows).

Easier to train staff


and maintain skill
level.

Softer and more comfortable: better patient


and parent experience.

-$?

= $?

2 Manley et al. New Engl J Med. 2013.


3 Yoder et al. Pediatrics. 2013.
4 Hochwald et al. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2010. 5 Hough et al. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011. 6 Ojha et al. Acta Paediatr. 2012.

Collins et al. J Pediatr. 2013.

32

Tools

Economics
Summary

Economics summary

$
Patient
outcomes

Product

Ease of use and


consumables

Developmental care
and patient journey

Therapy

Total
system cost

nCPAP

Optiflow Junior

Generic NHF cannula

34

Tools

The research &


development journey

Project background

In 2009 existing
cannula designs
left room for
improvement.
Opportunity to improve:
Flow range
Condensate control

Prong design
Retention mechanism
Tubing design
Speed and ease of application
1 Refs here

36

A patient-focussed R&D journey

Observation
Interacting with customers
Embedded our engineers in 50
hospitals around the world to look,
listen and learn

Design
Engineering concepts
Patient studies, research &
concept development

Customer needs

Clinical trials

Refining project objectives

1.5 years of field testing

Production
Manufacture
chosen concept

Distilling customer desires

37

Customer needs

Higher performance must


deliver a wider range of flows

Customer feedback
CLINICIAN: I want to be able to

deliver higher flows
NURSE:

No rain out in tubes


Give me pre-cut tape

PARENT:

I want to be able to
see my babys face

BABY:

Make me better
Let me sleep

Effective

Gentle
Easy
Increased safety
Enhanced facilitation
of developmental
care
Improved
comfort

Improved ease
of use for parent
and clinician

38

39

Tools

Unique features

Optiflow delivers:

Enhanced therapy

Effective

Gentle
Easy

Wide
flow range =
broad scope
of therapy from
one device

*
*
*
*

41

Optiflow delivers:

Enhanced protection and assurance

Effective

Gentle
Easy

Breathable
FlexiTube
designed to
minimise
condensate

Soft
ergonomic
prong design
to minimise
risk of septal
damage

Kink-proof
FlexiTube

Easy-click
connector swivels
to untangle
tubing without
disconnecting
flow

42

Optiflow delivers:

Enhanced protection and assurance

Effective

Gentle
Easy

Insulating
sleeve to
minimize
condensate

43

Optiflow delivers:

Enhanced developmental care

Effective

Gentle
Easy

Long
circuit for easy
kangaroo
care

Soft
unobtrusive
design facilitates
developmental
care

44

Optiflow delivers:

Enhanced comfort and toleration

Effective

Gentle
Easy

Wigglepad
attachment
for optimal
comfort

Soft prong
design to
minimise risk
of nasal
trauma

Anatomicallyshaped prongs
to fit developing
airway

45

Optiflow delivers:

Enhanced ease of use for caregivers

Effective

Gentle
Easy

Wigglepad
velcro allows
easy re-application,
adjustment and
maintenance

Long circuit
for flexiblity
in cares and
placement

46

Optiflow delivers:

Enhanced ease of use for parents

Effective

Gentle
Easy

Clothing
clip to assist
feeding

Long
circuit
for easy
feeding

47

Optiflow Junior

A nasal cannula designed


specifically for infants
and children

Enhancing the
established benefits of
nasal high flow therapy

Effective

Gentle
Easy

48

Award-winning
Optiflow Junior

Optiflow Junior has been recognised


the world over for its excellence in
design, winning many prestigious
product design awards.

49

Tools

Videos

Videos

Optiflow
Junior wins
Best Design
Award

Optiflow
Junior
fitting guide

51

Appendix

Introduction

The therapy
and Optiflow Junior
(CONCISE)

Overview

Nasal High Flow (NHF) therapy


is being widely adopted in
neonatal and pediatric practice.
Its superceding some
traditional therapies.
Its effective, gentle and easy.
The economic and health
benefits are emerging.
Optiflow Junior enhances
the therapy benefits.

Improved patient care and outcomes

Avoid intubation

NEONATAL
Readmission
ACUITY

Fisher & Paykel Healthcare


customer research
demonstrates that
clinicians want to:

Treat in a noninterventionist manner

LENGTH OF STAY

Shorten length-of-stay
(to free up beds)

Reduce the burden


of educating staff

PEDIATRIC
Readmission
ACUITY

Control costs

Avoid readmission

LENGTH OF STAY

FPH International Medical Director Research 2013.

A therapy arrives...
THE RESPIRATORY CARE CONTINUUM

INVASIVE
VENTILATION

nCPAP

NASAL
HIGH FLOW

OXYGEN
THERAPY

Commercially
available
circa 2001

Momentum has been building

Growing research
Number of NHF papers published from 2000-2013
(Neonatal and Pediatric)
40

Manley et al.
N Engl J Med
2013

35
number of papers

3 Randomised
Controlled Trials
(RCTs)

30

Yoder et al.
Pediatrics
2013

25
20
15

Collins e
t al.
J. Pediat
r.
2013

10
5
0

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

n = 867

Whats
behind the
momentum?
The literature indicates that
the momentum stems from
these therapy attributes:

Effective

Gentle
Easy

The literature suggests


these therapy benefits
vs nCPAP

Similar efficacy

to nCPAP1,2,3

Associated with

Effective

1,2,3
Less nasal trauma

reduced escalation
and length of stay4,5

No significant

difference in
adverse events1,2,3

Improved

bonding6,7,8

Simpler

Gentle

application6,7,8

Easy

Comfortable and

well tolerated

6,7,8

Empowers

parents9

Caregiver

satisfaction6,7,8

1 Collins et al. J Pediatr. 2013. 2 Manley et al. New Engl J Med. 2013. 3 Yoder et al. Pediatrics. 2013. 4 McKiernan et al. J Pediatr. 2010.
5 Schibler et al. Int Care Med. 2011. 6 Hochwald et al. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2010. 7 Hough et al. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011.
8
1 Ojha
al. Acta Paediatr. 2012. 9 Klingenburg at al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013.
here
Refs et

ACUITY

Neonatal health economic benefits are emerging

$
LENGTH OF STAY

Avoiding intubation

Reduced risk of nasal trauma

Indication of reduced intubation rates


when used in combination with nCPAP.

Nasal trauma can sometimes result in costly


corrective surgery.

Manley et al (2013) indicated a 7.4 %


reduction (p = 0.12 NS*) in re-intubation
rates when nCPAP could be used as a
rescue therapy after NHF. This was
compared to nCPAP alone.

Clinical studies have shown a 7%2 to 15%1


reduction in nasal trauma compared to nCPAP.

1 Manley et al. New Engl J Med. 2013.


4 Collins et al. Eur J Pediatr. 2013.
5

Yoder et al. Pediatrics. 2013.

Rnnestad et al. Pediatrics. 2005.

NHF reduces risk of nasal mucosa erosion4


which is a possible cause of nosocomial sepsis.5

Loftus et al. Laryngoscope. 1994.


* = Not Significant

ACUITY

Pediatric health economic benefits are emerging

LENGTH OF STAY

Avoiding intubation

Reduced length of stay

14 30% reduction in
intubation rate associated
with the introduction of NHF.1,2

2 day median reduction in


PICU length of stay associated
with the introduction of NHF.1,2

1 McKiernan et al. J Pediatr. 2010. 2


Schibler et al. Int Care Med. 2011.

10

Designed to enhance the inherent therapy benefits

Broader
range of
flows

In-built
safety
features

Effective

Enhancing
comfort

Gentle
Easy

Promoting
developmental
care

Simpler
for
caregivers

Further
empowers
parents

11

Where and why Optiflow Junior is being adopted

INVASIVE
VENTILATION

OXYGEN
THERAPY

nCPAP

Effective
Gentle
Easy

12

Improving patient care


and outcomes
Nasal High Flow therapy
is being widely adopted in
neonatal and pediatric practice.
Its superceding some
traditional therapies.
Its effective, gentle and easy.
The economic and health
benefits are emerging.
Optiflow Junior enhances
the therapy benefits.

13

Introduction

Beyond the ICU

The patient journey: neonatal care

ACUITY

Readmission

LENGTH OF STAY

L&D

NICU

WARD

HOME

Early use

Better management of symptoms

AIMS TO:

AIMS TO:

Keep kids out of the ICU


Reduce intubations
Reduce transfers
Shorten durations of intubation
Reduce need for nCPAP

Better manage symptoms with humidity


Shorten length of stay
Promote ease of use
Reduce re-admissions/admissions

15

The patient journey: pediatric care

ACUITY

Readmission

LENGTH OF STAY

ED

PICU

WARD

HOME

Early use

Better management of symptoms

AIMS TO:

AIMS TO:

Keep infants out of the ICU


Reduce intubations
Reduce transfers
Shorten durations of intubation
Reduce need for CPAP/
Non invasive ventilation

Better manage symptoms with humidity


Shorten length of stay
Promote ease of use
Reduce re-admissions/admissions

16

Introduction

Other evidence

Guidance on implementation is emerging


KEY:

NEONATAL

Guidance
source

Category
description

Collins et al
2013

Less than 32 weeks


gestational age

Manley et al
2013

Premature and
neonatal cannula

= Minimum flow

= Starting flow

= Maximum flow

Flow
1

10

11

Infant, intermediate
infant cannula
Pediatric cannula

Yoder et al
2013

<2kg
2-3kg
>3kg

PEDIATRIC

Milsi et al
2013

Collins et al. J. Pediatr. 2013.

Weight range
2.6 7.3kg

2 Manley et al. New Engl J Med. 2013.

2 litres per kg per minute


3

Yoder et al. Pediatrics. 2013.

Milsi et al. Int Care Med. 2013.

18

The evidence of the momentum

Growing
usage

Published
surveys
of practice

Australia/NZ USA

UK

Users:
Evidence of increasing use in clinical practice (ANZNN Report)
Findings:

Approximately 70% of respondents reported using nasal


high flow in some capacity in their neonatal practice

Hochwald et al. J Neonatal-Perinatal Med. 2010.

Hough et al. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011.

Ojha et al. Acta Paediatrica. 2012.

19

S-ar putea să vă placă și