Sunteți pe pagina 1din 5

There is so much false information here...

I was
asked to listen to a specific segment of this
broadcast, otherwise I would never have bothered.
I suspect that this message will be deleted
because the author of this show is a coward and
intentionally spreads lies and misinformation. But
dont worry, the vast majority of people would not
spend the time to read this long reply anyway.
I am sorry, but I am not a spokesman for any
group. I AM NOT THE HEAD OF ANY OCCUPY
MOVEMENT OR ANY OTHER MOVEMENT. This just
shows how bad and inaccurate information is
being placed out there and then it is shared
without being verified and passed as truth. Does
not the bible say that you do not bare false
witness? Does it not say that you should not lie? Is
not an unfounded accusation or information a lie
and false witness? Spreading false words upon the
land?
Nobody is running to me for answers, this is once
again a false statement created out of ignorance.
With such blatant ignorance and the spreading of
false information why would I even want to debate
what is obviously an Attack debate? It is
apparent that you are not interested in the truth
If you want to hear what I say then go to my
Youtube Channel Judge Darby and listen to the
interviews and lectures. I stand by my work, my
integrity, and my honesty, and my research. Your
guest states that if I say anything different then
what he says then I am a liar now what kind of
debate do you think there would be if anything
that I would say is different is automatically called
lying? I am sorry that nobody can take this offer
seriously because it is not being offered in

honesty. It is nothing more than an emotional


diatribe and character assassination in order to
enlarge your own ego. I have no interest I your
grandstanding and self-edification before the
public. Thank you but no thank you, you are not of
the professional level that I debate or interview
with you are nothing more than a grand-stander
boosting your own ego at other peoples expense.
I do not fault you for being ignorant, but I would
appreciate that you stop spreading false
information about me or at least do a little tiny
bit of research before spouting your ignorance; of
course that is your decision and choice. It is based
upon your integrity and your honour as a man.
Have you served in the Military as I have done?
Have you signed a sworn oath to protect this
country as all military men have done? Did you
run and hide from serving our country? Have you
actively done anything in protection of this
country other than sit behind your computer and
talk? Talk is cheap, and it is easy to tear down
others when you do nothing else WHAT ARE
YOUR WORKS?
At 36:22 in this video you state that I am a federal
district Judge or an ex-federal district judge
This in itself proves my point about your excessive
ignorance. I have never stated that I am a Federal
District Judge, this is once again evidence by your
own statement of your lack of understanding your
lack of basic research and that you are clueless.
You did not take any time to understand or
research or anything. You just opened your
mouth and spewed out lie after lie bearing false
witness against me so that you can inflame your
audience to get more people to listen to you. With
this lack of integrity on your part and your guest,

there is no ethical reason for me to engage with


you or your guest.
For the record: I am a Continental Land Jurisdiction
Judge (http://4-cd.com and http://ccsus1.com); if
you really understood the difference between the
Statutory
Admiralty
Jurisdiction
and
Land
Jurisdiction then I suspect that you would
understand this. You would understand the
difference between a Statutory Judge and a
Continental Judge because the difference is the
difference between night and day. Your missinformed belief is that they are the same, and no
they are not in any way shape for form. You are
only proving your ignorance and your willingness
to spread that ignorance. You should hold your
tongue until you understand and know the truth
then speak only the truth, not the rumors,
guesses, or ignorance.
The items that need to be understood are all the
founding documents such as the Magna Carta, the
Declaration of Independence, the Organic
constitution, the original 13th amendment, The
Articles of Confederation, the Treaty of Paris 1783
and 1786... Understanding the true nature of the
Common Law Grand Jury as given to us by our
forefathers, the federalist papers and the antifederalist papers... These are some of the guiding
documents that we must go by.
What we now have, is a corporation that provides
governmental services. The courts ARE NOT
civilian courts; they are corporate For Profit
courts. This is easily verified by looking up the
Dunn and Bradstreet corporate number (usually
known as the Dun number).

The Stars and Stripes (flag) is a military flag and


the fringe places it in Admiralty. The civilian flag,
created in 1799 by Oliver Wolcott Jr. who was the
Sec. of the Treasury under John Adams. The Land
Jurisdiction flag or otherwise known as the Civilian
flag is a white background with vertical red stripes
and blue stars. Again, this is a historical fact that
is easily verifiable.
The Original Oath/pledge of allegiance (created by
Minister Francis Bellamy in 1892) did not have the
phrase (Under God) because the forefathers
(including the minister himself) wanted to keep
the separation of church and state. The phrase
under God was actually placed into the pledge
in 1954. America was NOT TO BE A THEOCRACY. It
was meant to be a Republic.
In 1861 the south succeeded from the union of
states because the North breached the contract
that was the Constitution. They concluded that
last session Adjourn Sine Di without a next
meeting date. Slavery was not the issue but rather
the breach of state sovereignty. In 1862 Lincoln
created the Corporation of the United States of
America originally incorporated in France Since
then there has been a number of corporations
such as UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, etc refer to (title 28 3002 item 15)
As for your questions related at time mark 36:51
We are under Marshal rule which is the Lieberman
code as instituted by the first corporate president
Abraham Lincoln. That has never changed. Which
is why the Provost Marshal of the Oregon National
Guard did have the jurisdiction to go to Burns
Oregon and protect the people from the
unconstitutional invaders of their county and their

city who in fact terrorized the people. If you


listened to the first video on my channel than you
would have known this.
The 14th amendment was a creation of the
Corporate government that went to war with the
south. It is not part of the original Organic
constitution. In fact it creates a corporate citizen
that has privileges bestowed by the state and no
actual rights. The constitution did not and never
did give you any rights; it only protected specific
rights with the understanding that the people had
unleinable rights. All actions and legislation after
1871 are corporate actions, not of the people or of
common law.
We do not need to create something new, the
forefathers used great wisdom in the separation of
Church and state for a very specific reason

S-ar putea să vă placă și