Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
la:ni: said that the H:adi:th: doeth not shew any Fad:i:lah
[Virtue]. Listen lecture 131-c,116-b.
This the blind Taqli:d of Imam Ibn Asqala:ni [d :852
A.H] .
Since the Tradition quoted by Imam Ibn H:ajr doeth shew
the Fad:ilah [Virtue] of Saiyiduna Muaviah RD. This
Tradition [Hadith No:=3766] Stateeth at least One Fad:ilah
Of Saiyiduna Muaviah RD. That is of S:ah:biah. This is
even accepted by Ibn H:ajr Asqalani.
The Attempted Proof Text:=
Bukhari mentioned "dh:ikr" rather than M-n-qabah or Fadheelah
because there is no fad:i:lah in this H:adi:th: (quoted by Bukhari)
but the apparent testimony of Ibn Abbas are evidence of his great
virtue (i.e. the words Ibn Abbas ra used for Muawiyah ra) he is
faqeeh and he was sahabi of Prophet peace be upon him. Ibn Abi
Asim wrote a (separate) Juzz in his (Muawiyah`s ra) Manaqib, Abu
Umar Ghulam Tha`lab and Abu Bakar Naqqash also (wrote juzz in
Manaqib) [Fath al Bari under the chapter "Dhikar al Muawiyah"]
Logical Argument:=
According to the Founder of Engineeriah sect there is only
one virtue of MaulNA Muaviah RD.
BUT THIS IS REFUTED LOGICALLY AS FOLLOW:=
If This Holy Tradition Stateth Only One tradition then it
Doeth State atleast one Fad:i:lah.
The commentary of Imam Aini: is far more better then Imam Ibn
H:ahr at this H:ad:th: . Since it has irrefutable proofs.
He saith:=
.. He (Bukhari) did not mentioned
The Virtues of Ibn
Abbas as he said for the other Companions Because he
already made a Chapter in Book of Knowledge that "Chapter
about Saying of Prophet O Allah Teach him the Book" and
then under it he narrated from him (Ibn Abbas) that he said
Prophet embraced me and said O Allah teach him the Book,
(i Ayni Say) this is a great Virtue and Imam Bukhari be
settled with not discussing the Word Virtue Over Here.
(Ummdatul Qari 23/393)
Although Imam Aini is H:anafi and Ibn H:ajr is a ShafaI, yet such
distinctions are useless since Engineer Ali Mirza claims that he
requires proofs . If so then the proofs for IMAM Aini are perfect and
irrefutable in regard to the commentary in this regard.
NOTES:
1]So it is astonishing to see that Engineer Ali Mirza: has become a Muqallid
of Ibn H:ajr instead of accepting his error.
2]The status of Sharh: Of Bukha:ri is not equal to the Holy Bukha:ri It Self. To
dispute from the given Sh-r-h: of Bukha:ri: is one thing and to dispute from
the Very Holy Bukha:ri: is an other thing.
3] If an explanation of Text Of Holy Tradition Of Holy Bukhari: Shari:f
contradicteth the Explicit Text of Tradition of Bukha:ri: , then the explanation
is discarded , Since in principle any Speech of any created Rational
Suppositum that Contradicteth a S:ah:ih: H:adi:th: is wrong and incorrect.
CONLUSION
3764.
H:asan BN Bisr Stated to Us, Muafi: Stated to Us,From Uth:ma:n Bin Asvad, From
Ibn Abi Mulaicah, that He stated that:
6
Mu'aviyah did offer one Rak'ah War prayerafter the 'Isha prayer, and at that time a
freed slave[former bound man] of Ibn 'AbbSs was present. He (i.e., the former
slave/boundman) did go to Ibn 'Abbas (and told him that Mu'aviyah did offer one
Rak'a in War prayer).Ibn 'Abbas said, "Leave him, for He was in the company of
Allah's Messenger.
This Holy Text Of H:adi:th: doeth prove the Fad:ilah of Compaionship of Holy Apostle.
This is Fad:ilah Number 1.
This shews that this word is used as a virtue unless and otherwise there is a certain
evidence that it is not. Other wise to term Qura:n Shal not be among M-NA:Q-B.
2] ALLAH SAITH :=
So even the slightest possibility or probability of this answer refutes the self
designed reasoning of Ali Mirza that it was duet o the [alleged] reason that He did
not found any tradition in the Ba:b of M-na:q-b.
These are Insha: Allah sufficient for any one who wand to compare Ali Mirzas
objections and Answers of Ahlussunnah impartially and unbiased.
So this is proved that the Word Zikr [Azka:r] is used for M-na:q-b by IMAM
BUKHA:RI with out any doubt.
The explanation of Ibn H:ajr is atmost a Possible explanation yet one has a right to
accept an other possible explanation , on the basis Proofs.
The explanation of Ibn H:ajr is not only proofless but it is against a number of Proofs.