Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Brain, Behavior & Aging Research Center, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles,
CA, USA
2
Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los
Angeles, CA, USA
3
Nuclear Medicine Service, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
4
Department of Physics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
The copy condition of the ReyOsterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) is sensitive to Alzheimers disease (AD)
pathology, but its neural correlates remain unclear. We used fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
(FDGPET) to elucidate this association in 77 patients with probable AD. We observed a correlation between
ROCF and metabolic rate of bilateral temporalparietal cortex and occipital lobe, and right frontal lobe. Global
and local elements of the ROCF correlated with metabolic rate of these same regions. The copy approach correlated
with right lateral temporal cortex. The ROCF appears reflective of posterior temporalparietal cortex functioning,
highlighting the role of visuospatial processing in constructional abilities in AD.
Keywords: Alzheimers disease; ReyOsterrieth Complex Figure; Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission
tomography; Visuospatial; Construction.
INTRODUCTION
Alzheimers disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative
disorder characterized by a progressive decline
in neuropsychological functioning across multiple cognitive domains, including the areas of
attention/information processing, learning and
memory, visuospatial functioning, language,
and executive/frontal lobe functioning (Lezak,
Howieson, & Loring, 2004). Many tests have been
developed to assess visuospatial skills in AD;
however, the ReyOsterrieth Complex Figure Test
(ROCF; Osterrieth, 1944; Rey, 1941) represents a
benchmark test and is one of the most commonly
used in the field of geriatric neuropsychology
Support was provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs (Merit Review to D. Sultzer and Career Development Award to
R. Melrose) and National Institutes of Health (NIH; R01 MH56031). David Sultzer has received research grant support from Forest
Research Institute. Potential conflicts to study participants were disclosed.
Address correspondence to Rebecca Melrose, West Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, Building 401, Room A209, 11301 Wilshire
Blvd., 116AE, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA (E-mail: rjmelrose@ucla.edu).
and parietal lobes were associated with performance on visual tests, although the ROCF was
not significant in this analysis. A principal component analysis of metabolism in AD found that
performance on the ROCF correlated with two networks: one encompassing bilateral posterior brain
regions including retrosplenial/posterior cingulate
cortex, precuneus, and parietal and lateral temporal lobes, and a second including those regions plus
bilateral prefrontal cortex (Salmon et al., 2009).
Finally, in a combined group of patients with Mild
Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and AD, the ROCF
correlated with cortical thinning of the right temporal gyrus, right superior parietal lobule, bilateral
posterior cingulate, and right middle frontal gyrus
(Ahn et al., 2011). All of these studies identify the
right superior parietal lobule as a correlate, but differ as to the role of bilateral temporal and frontal
regions in ROCF performance. Likewise, investigations exploring other figure copying tests in AD
have differed, documenting associations with only
temporal/temporalparietal (Boxer et al., 2003;
Nobili et al., 2005), temporal and frontal (Forster
et al., 2009), or temporalparietal and frontal
regions (Teipel et al., 2006). As such, the neurobiology of figure copying in AD remains unclear.
The ROCF is conceptualized as a measure of
visuoconstruction, suggesting that it may largely
localize to the right hemisphere. In a mixed clinical sample, it has been found to correlate with
visual neuropsychological tests, including measures
of visual perception, judgment of spatial relations,
visual organization, and set shifting (Meyers &
Meyers, 1995). In right-hemisphere patients, ROCF
copy scores appear related to both visuoperceptive
and spatial manipulation abilities (Trojano et al.,
2004). In AD specifically, figure copying has been
shown to correlate with measures of visual exploration and judgment of spatial relations (Guerin,
Belleville, & Ska, 2002), as well as design fluency (Mickanin, Grossman, Onishi, Auriacombe,
& Clark, 1994). It appears that the ROCF is associated with a host of cognitive abilities thought to
reflect right-hemisphere functioning.
As summarized above, visual perception has been
identified as a ROCF correlate (Meyers & Meyers,
1995; Trojano et al., 2004). Visuoperception may be
subdivided into global (gestalt) or local (detailed)
processing, reflecting a bias towards right and
left hemispheres, respectively (Van Kleeck, 1989).
This hemispheric specialization may be particularly
present in early visual processing in extrastriate
regions (Fink et al., 1996; Peyrin, Baciu, Segebarth,
& Marendaz, 2004). Based on the foregoing, it
follows that when copying the ROCF, the right
hemisphere may be preferentially involved in the
247
METHOD
Participants
Data from 86 patients with probable AD were
reviewed. Of the 86 subjects, 77 completed the
ROCF copy condition and were included in subsequent analyses. Of the 9 subjects not included
248
MELROSE ET AL.
Neuropsychological testing
Neuropsychological measures were drawn from
a larger neuropsychological battery. The Folstein
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; Folstein,
Folstein, & McHugh, 1975) and the Dementia
Rating Scale (DRS; Mattis, 1988) were administered to assess global cognitive impairment.
Complex visuoconstruction was assessed using the
ROCF copy condition (Meyers & Meyers, 1995).
The ROCF has shown good reliability in patients
with memory impairment (Tupler, Welsh, AsareAboagye, & Dawson, 1995). Patients were required
to copy a complex figure, and scoring was done
in accordance with the Meyers and Meyers (1995)
criteria. Total score ranged from 036, with higher
scores indicating better performance. In this scoring
paradigm, the ROCF is broken into 18 components.
One point is awarded for object accuracy (does the
element look as it should?), and a second point is
awarded for location accuracy (is the element in the
249
RESULTS
Participants consisted of 77 patients diagnosed with
probable AD. This included 62 men and 15 women.
Sixty-seven were right-handed and 8 were lefthanded (data missing from 2). Fifty-three identified as white, 15 as African-American, 5 as
Asian/Pacific Islander, and 4 as Hispanic. Results
of the neuropsychological testing are presented in
Table 1. Education level was unavailable from 5 participants, and DRS scores were unavailable from
1 participant.
Mean
78.4
14.1
3.0
20.2
106.9
34.6
25.0
5.3
29.7
12.3
18.2
5.7
12.6
2.2
SD
8.0
3.6
2.4
4.9
15.9
2.4
7.0
1.2
5.7
4.2
9.4
2.7
7.5
1.5
Range
5297
624
010
628
54141
2337
737
16
1439
422
135
010
126
05
250
MELROSE ET AL.
TABLE 2
SPM results of the correlation between ROCF and metabolism
Region
Frontal pole
Middle frontal gyrus
Middle/superior frontal gyri
Precentral gyrus
Supramarginal gyrus
Temporal; Parietal;
Occipital
Inferior occipital gyrus
Inferior occipital gyrus
BA
Side
t-value
p-value
10
9/46
8/9
6
40
20/21/22/37;
40/39/7;
17/18/19
19
18
R
R
R
R
L
R/L
26
42
28
62
40
14
66
38
22
6
44
80
8
36
60
36
36
50
4.05
4.01
3.62
2.97
3.24
5.72
.002
.002
.005
.019
.011
.001
284
477
693
52
97
22,720
L
L
46
22
64
90
8
14
2.86
3.76
.024
.003
143
369
Note. Statistics shown for the peak voxel within each cluster. ROCF = ReyOsterrieth Complex Figure; BA = approximate Brodmanns
region; R = right, L = left; x,y,z = MNI (Montreal Neurological Institute) coordinates; p-value after correction using the FDR (false
discovery rate) procedure; k = number of voxels within the cluster.
251
Figure 1. Association between ReyOsterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) and cerebral metabolism. SPM results (p < .05, FDR corrected,
extent = 50 voxels, where FDR = false discovery rate) displayed on the smoothed average brain in SPM2. To view a color version of this
figure, please see the online issue of the Journal.
TABLE 3
SPM results of the correlation between GLOB and metabolism
Region
Frontal pole
Middle frontal gyrus
Inferior frontal gyrus
Middle/superior frontal gyri
Temporal; Parietal;
Occipital
Inferior occipital gyrus
Lingual gyrus/cuneus
Inferior occipital gyrus
BA
Side
10
9/46
44
9/8/6
20/21/22/37;
40/39/7;
17/18/19
19
17/18
18
R
R
R
R
R/L
L
L
L
t-value
p-value
30
44
44
40
40
64
40
14
0
32
10
34
26
60
28
3.13
3.93
3.37
4.10
5.72
.013
.003
.008
.002
.001
176
299
231
723
22,178
44
16
24
70
72
90
0
26
14
2.82
3.34
2.85
.026
.009
.025
71
520
67
Note. Statistics shown for the peak voxel within each cluster. GLOB = global; BA = approximate Brodmanns region; R = right, L =
left; x,y,z = MNI (Montreal Neurological Institute) coordinates; p-value after correction using the FDR (false discovery rate) procedure;
k = number of voxels within the cluster.
252
MELROSE ET AL.
Figure 2. Association between GLOB/DET (global/details) and cerebral metabolism. The left side includes SPM results (p < .05 FDR
corrected, extent = 50 voxels, where FDR = false discovery rate) displayed on the smoothed average brain in SPM2 demonstrating
the correlation between (a) GLOB and metabolism and (b) DET and metabolism. The right side illustrates the unique contribution of
GLOB after controlling for DET, and DET after controlling for GLOB (p < .005, uncorrected, extent = 10 voxels). GLOB in blue/black
and DET in green/grey, through (c) the temporal cortex (x = 64, y = 48), and (d) the prefrontal cortex (PFC; x = 33, y = 44). To view
a color version of this figure, please see the online issue of the Journal.
TABLE 4
SPM results of the correlation between DET and metabolism
Region
Frontal pole
Middle frontal gyrus
Middle/superior frontal gyri
Temporal; Parietal;
Occipital
Inferior occipital gyrus
BA
Side
10
9/46
8/9
20/21/22/37;
40/39/7;
17/18/19
18
R
R
R
R/L
t-value
p-value
26
36
30
14
68
44
24
80
6
38
58
50
4.08
4.11
3.48
5.33
.005
.005
.009
.004
168
309
230
17,938
20
90
14
3.72
.007
286
Note. Statistics shown for the peak voxel within each cluster. DET = details; BA = approximate Brodmanns region; R = right, L = left;
x,y,z = MNI (Montreal Neurological Institute) coordinates; p-value after correction using the FDR (false discovery rate) procedure;
k = number of voxels within the cluster.
(p < .05 FDR corrected). We relaxed the statistical threshold (p < .005 uncorrected, extent =
10 voxels) and reexamined the data to determine
whether there were any trends. The GLOB score
was associated with hypometabolism of right IFG,
premotor cortex, lateral temporal cortex, fusiform,
lingual gyrus, precuneus, and lateral occipital cortex (Figure 2c). The DET scores were associated with hypometabolism in right frontal pole,
MFG, temporal pole, posterior ITG, fusiform;
bilateral IPL, SPL, and precuneus; and left lingual gyrus (Figure 2d). In summary, trends suggested that DET showed a more bilateral representation and included more right prefrontal
regions.
253
DISCUSSION
The current study explored the association between
cerebral metabolism as assessed by FDGPET
and performance on the ROCF copy condition
in patients with probable AD. The findings documented that performance on the ROCF was associated with cerebral metabolism in many regions
of association cortex. The largest cluster was
observed in the right posterior cortex, encompassing the superior and inferior parietal lobules,
lateral temporal cortex and fusiform, and occipital cortex. Additional correlations were observed
in the right prefrontal cortex, right frontal eye
fields, right precentral gyrus, and left posterior
parietal/occipital cortex. There were no unique
associations between metabolism and global versus local features of the ROCF, but trends in the
data suggested that details were more associated
with dorsolateral prefrontal and bilateral parietal
TABLE 5
SPM results of the correlation between ORG and metabolism
Region
Lateral temporal lobe
BA
Side
t-value
p-value
20/21/22/37
42
50
28
5.49
.005
3,693
Note. Statistics shown for the peak voxel within each cluster. ORG = organization. BA = approximate Brodmanns region; R = right;
x,y,z = MNI (Montreal Neurological Institute) coordinates; p-value after correction using the FDR (false discovery rate) procedure;
k = number of voxels within the cluster.
Figure 3. Association between ORG (organization) and cerebral metabolism. SPM results (p < .05, FDR corrected, extent = 50 voxels,
where FDR = false discovery rate). Results displayed on (a) the smoothed average brain and on (b) coronal view through the posterior
temporal cortex. To view a color version of this figure, please see the online issue of the Journal.
254
MELROSE ET AL.
255
256
MELROSE ET AL.
REFERENCES
Ahn, H. J., Seo, S. W., Chin, J., Suh, M. K., Lee, B. H.,
Kim, S. T., . . . Na, D. L. (2011). The cortical neuroanatomy of neuropsychological deficits in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimers disease: A surfacebased morphometric analysis. Neuropsychologia, 49,
39313945. doi:10.1016%2Fj.neuropsychologia.2011.
10.010
Binder, L. M. (1982). Constructional strategies on complex figure drawings after unilateral brain damage. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 4, 5158.
doi:10.1080/01688638208401116
Boxer, A. L., Rankin, K. P., Miller, B. L., Schuff,
N., Weiner, M., Gorno-Tempini, M. L., & Rosen,
H. J. (2003). Cinguloparietal atrophy distinguishes
Alzheimer disease from semantic dementia. Archives
of Neurology, 60, 949956. doi:10.1001/archneur.60.
7.94960/7/949
Cahn-Weiner, D. A., Sullivan, E. V., Shear, P. K., Fama,
R., Lim, K. O., Yesavage, J. A., . . . Pfefferbaum,
A. (1999). Brain structural and cognitive correlates
of clock drawing performance in Alzheimers disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological
Society, 5, 502509. doi:10.1017/S1355617799566034
Camara, W. J., Nathan, J. S., & Puente, A. E. (2000).
Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research
257
258
MELROSE ET AL.
Tippett, W. J., & Black, S. E. (2008). Regional cerebral blood flow correlates of visuospatial tasks
in Alzheimers disease. Journal of the International
Neuropsychological Society, 14, 10341045. doi:10.
1017%2FS1355617708081241
Trojano, L., Fragassi, N. A., Chiacchio, L., Izzo, O., Izzo,
G., Di Cesare, G., . . . Grossi, D. (2004). Relationships
between constructional and visuospatial abilities in
normal subjects and in focal brain-damaged patients.
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology,
26, 11031112. doi:10.1080%2F13803390490515522
Tupler, L. A., Welsh, K. A., Asare-Aboagye, Y., &
Dawson, D. V. (1995). Reliability of the Rey
Osterrieth Complex Figure in use with memoryimpaired patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17, 566579. doi:10.1080/
01688639508405146
Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D.,
Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., . . . Joliot, M.
(2002). Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain.
NeuroImage, 15, 273289. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.
0978
Ueda, H., Kitabayashi, Y., Narumoto, J., Nakamura,
K., Kita, H., Kishikawa, Y., & Fukui, K. (2002).
Relationship between clock drawing test performance
and regional cerebral blood flow in Alzheimers disease: A single photon emission computed tomography study. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 56,
2529. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1819.2002.00940.x
Van Kleeck, M. H. (1989). Hemispheric differences
in global versus local processing of hierarchical
visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a
meta-analysis of previous studies. Neuropsychologia,
27, 11651178. doi:10.1016%2F0028-3932%2889%
2990099-7
Vidoni, E. D., Honea, R. A., & Burns, J. M.
(2010). Neural correlates of impaired functional independence in early Alzheimers disease. Journal of
Alzheimers Disease, 19, 517527. doi:10.3233/JAD2010-1245
Watanabe, K., Ogino, T., Nakano, K., Hattori, J., Kado,
Y., Sanada, S., & Ohtsuka, Y. (2005). The Rey
Osterrieth Complex Figure as a measure of executive function in childhood. Brain & Development, 27,
564569. doi:10.1016%2Fj.braindev.2005.02.007
Copyright of Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology is the property of Psychology Press (UK)
and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright
holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.