Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ACN
I. INTRODUCTION
978-81-8465-152-2/09/$26.002009 CODEC
IPv4 users contributes to the fact that the transition from IPv4
to IPv6 is expected to be a long process. The key to a
successful transition to IPv6 is compatibility with the large
installed base of IPv4 hosts and routers. Maintaining
compatibility with IPv4 during the exploitation of IPv6 will
rationalize the job of transitioning the Internet to IPv6. This
specification defines a set of mechanisms that IPv6 hosts and
routers may implement in order to be compatible with IPv4
hosts and routers. But IPv6 lacks backward compatibility with
IPv4, leading to the fact that IPv6 hosts and routers will not be
able to deal directly with IPv4 traffic and vice-versa. Also, it
is impractical to invest in a fully new IPv6 infrastructure. This
is due to the fact that most of the applications that exist today
were written for IPv4 network and moreover the large
infrastructures where a huge amount has been invested in
setting the IPv4 network totally refute from converting to
IPv6. A huge cost will be incurred to re-setup the network.
Moreover, movement from IPv4 to IPv6 is not a straightaway
process and so cannot take place within a fortnight; it requires
developing mechanisms so that IPv4 and IPv6 may exist
together for at least many coming years and during this
transition period IPv4 network will totally disappear [2]. The
aim of this paper is to examine the behavior of a transition
mechanism that will involve the communication between two
IPv4 hosts over an IPv6 network under various traffic
conditions.
This will make possible the exchange of
information between IPv4-only network hosts through an
integrated IPv6/IPv4 network. And hence we call it Dual
Stack Transition Mechanism (DSTM) as the integrated
IPv6/IPv4 network maintains a dual stack of both IPv4 and
IPv6. The necessity of reexamining the problem arises as the
research in this area has not very widely been explored.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section II
discusses the related work in this area along with our
motivation for this research. Section III illustrates the network
architecture used in the work. The simulation scenario is
discussed in section IV and section V shows the results and
discussions. The paper is concluded in section VI.
II. RELATED WORK AND MOTIVATION
Many transition mechanisms have been proposed so far and
research work has been carried as well in all these
mechanisms. Although the research in various transition
mechanisms has not been conducted much, but still many
ACN
IPv6
NETWORK
IPv4 HOST
DSTM
TSP
IPv4 HOST
DSTM
TEP
978-81-8465-152-2/09/$26.002009 CODEC
ACN
DE
i =1
Nr
(1)
FTP
End-to-End
Delay(ms)
60
RA
End-to-End
Delay(ms)
140
CBR
End-to-End
Delay(ms)
50
512
70
142
65
1000
82
160
76
1256
107
235
98
TABLE II
MEAN END-TO-END DELAY FOR IPV4 AND IPV6 NETWORK (WITH DSTM)
Packet Size
(Bytes)
FTP
End-to-End
Delay(ms)
RA
End-to-End
Delay(ms)
CBR
End-to-End
Delay(ms)
256
100
180
80
512
110
180
95
1000
115
190
103
1256
140
310
132
VI. CONCLUSION
This research is just an attempt to show the current scenario
of the impact of transition mechanisms over a network. It
reflects the performance overhead incurred by DSTM as
compared to an IPv4-only network. This work also concludes
that in spite of imposing extra delay to the network, the DSTM
is significant as a transition mechanism due to two facts.
Firstly, a transition mechanism is required for the smooth
interoperation of both the protocols and secondly, DSTM has
proved to have several features of tunneling and dual-stack
approach which can be considered as an intermediate of these
two transition mechanisms. This way DSTM provides better
reliability and low data loss by combining the features of the
two transition mechanisms. This research will encourage the
scientists across the globe to explore more on many other
978-81-8465-152-2/09/$26.002009 CODEC
ACN