Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
INTRODUCTION
It was only with the event of the industrial revolution during the 18 and 19
centuries that the need for scientifically studying and analyzing modern
organization arose. In the years of cottage industries and craftsman organization
labour relations was clearly not a problem, but when groups of people were
brought together into commercial and manufacturing enterprises some way had to
be found to co-ordinate their activities to exchange organizational effectiveness
and continuing health of the enterprise.
Most public and private sector organizations in India are today facing labor
relations problems harmonious relations in every sphere of human activity is an
essential condition for social, economic and political progress. In the present
environment charactrised by low wages unemployment and using workers
aspiration problems such as work shappages, low level of motivation, indiscipline
insubordinations, militancy are on the increase such labour problems have
unprecident and unequalled impact on the working of the organization. To combat
the appropriate organization arrangements and strategies, to bring about harmony
and understanding at all levels an organizational climate for efficiency and
productivity is called for by personal practices.
Survey details
Universe of this particular study is at Power Best Electricals which is a
private sector company.
Sampling Details
Here, the researcher adopted stratified sampling as well as simple random
sampling techniques.
Since the population from which the sample is to be taken is not
homogeneous so stratified sampling method is applied to obtain 7 representative
sample from the population, which is stratified into a number of strata. The strata
selected is from department and then the items are selected from each strata
(department) using lottery method of simple random / sampling method.
Using these techniques 100 was taken as the sampling size, which is 30%
of the total employee strength.
DATA COLLECTION DETAILS
Source of Data Primary Data
The source of primary data is the employees of Power Best Electricals.
With the help of the questionnaire distributed among the employee, the researcher
collected the needful information from the respondent. The questionnaire is a list
of questions to be asked or answered from the respondent. The questionnaire was
an open one. It also provided the space where the answers can be recorded. The
questions are multiple choices. The researcher collected the required data through
the personal interview.
Secondary data
The secondary data has been collected from the publications, office records,
profile of the company needed for the study.
The study has made use of both primary and secondary data. This study is
mainly based on the primary data collected from the workers of Power Best
Electricals. It was also used to review some of the matters relating to the company.
Analysis is a part of study, completely depends on the data collected from the
workers.
TOOLS OF THE STUDY
Percentage Analysis
This the simplest way to analyse different types of data in this method we
found out the percentage of the of each data with respect to total. using this
percentage rate we analyse data.
Pie-Diagrams
Pie- Diagrams are used when the aggregate and their division are to be
shown together. The aggregate is shown by means of a circle and the sectors of the
circle.
Chi square Test
The chi square test is used to test whether there is a significant difference
between the observed number of responses in each category and the expected
number of responses for such category under the assumptions of null hypothesis.
In other words the objective is to find out how well the distribution of observed
frequencies o fit the distribution of expected frequencies E. Hence this test is
also called goodness of fit test.
The random variable whose sampling distribution is approximated by chisquare distribution is given by
Chi-square = (O-E)2 /E
The calculated value of chi-square is then compared with the critical value
of Chi-square from the table with a pre-established value at the level of
significance and at the given degree of freedom.
and features regarding the climate could not be analyzed and taken in to
account.
Because of the busy schedule, the employees were not able to provide
enough information.
The attitude of the workers is change from time to time. Hence the result of
towards management.
CHAPTER 2
CONCEPTS REVIEW
2.1 CONCEPT OF STUDY
The term Job satisfaction refers to an employees general attitude towards
his job. Lock defines job satisfaction as a pleasurable or positive emotional state
resulting form the appraisal of ones job or job experience. To the extent that a
persons job fulfills his dominant need and is consistent with his expectations and
values, the job will be satisfying.
The term job satisfaction not only covers the satisfaction decided from the
job by labours, but their surroundings supervisor and manager, their way of
approaching and handling the labour to accomplish the particular job, tp
management vision and their way of communicating at the visions to the labours
nature etc. If a company wants to sustain permanently in the market that concern
should work with satisfied employees. Satisfied employees not only increase the
companies corporate states in and around the society but also increase the social
values. All actions and reactions of the company normally hit the morale of the
employees if the employees morale goes down it automatically tells as that the
company is according with unsatisfied employees. If that scenario is allowed to
10
continue it not only decelerate the production level but also relishes the company
from the market picture.
Getting the higher production and supply of the quality products to the
market cannot be attained without high morale and motivated labors. So labor
should be satisfied by their jobs.
JOB SATISFACTION:
The term job satisfaction attitudes and industrial morale are often used
synonymously.
Refers to the feelings and emotional aspects of individual experience to
towards his job.
Job satisfaction plays an important role for an employee in terms of health
and well being and for an organizational in terms of its productivity
efficiency, employee relations, absenteeism and turnover.
DETERMINANTS OF JOB SATISFACTION:
According to Abraham A. A. Korman there are two types of Variable which
determine the job satisfaction of as individual they are
(1) organizational variables
(2) Personal Variable.
11
Organizational Variable:
1) Occupational Level:The higher the level of the job, the greats the saisfaction of the individual.
This is because higher levels jobs carry greater prestige and self control.
2) Job Content:
Greater the variation in job content and less the repetitiveness with which
the tasks must be performed the greater the satisfaction of the individual involved
3) Considerate Leadership:
People like to be treated with consideration. Hence Considerate leadership
results in higher job satisfaction than inconsiderate leadership.
4) Pay and Promotional Opportunities:
All other things being equal these two variable are positively related to job
satisfaction.
5) Interaction in the work Group:
Here the question is when is interaction in the work group a source of job
satisfaction and when it is not Interaction is most satisfying when
12
13
Different individuals hold different perceptions about their role i.e. the kind
of activities and behaviors they should engage into perform their job successfully.
Job satisfaction determined by these factors also.
Sex:
There is get no consistent evidence as to whether women are more satisfied
with their jobs than men. Holding such factors as job and occupational level
constant.
14
15
Blum (1984) found that job satisfaction was a general attitude which was
the result of many specific attitudes in three areas namely, specific job factors,
individual characteristic and group relationships out side the job.
Sharma (1991) found union involvement to be the test predictor of
satisfaction followed by recruitment policy, work technology occupational
aspiration and party monthly income.
Mishra (1992) found significant difference between respondents from
public and private sectors with regard to the climate satisfaction relationship on
such dimensions as scope of advertisement monetary benefits, objectively
appreciation training, education and welfare facilities. Sinha and Sinha (1995)
found that nature of work and human relations contributed directly to satisfy
nature of job in the case of managers.
Pratap and Srivastava (1995) reported significant difference between
private and public sector employees in team of satisfaction and organizational
climate with private firm employees being more satisfied and finding their
organizational climate to be better.
A vast majority of studies have provided evidence for correlation between
satisfaction and participation (Miller and Monje 1999, Singh and Pestonjee 1999).
16
CHAPTER 3
COMPANY PROFILE
POWER BEST ELECTRICALS
POWER BEST ELECRICAL PRIVATE LIMITED is a private company
within the meaning of section 3(1) (ii) of the companies act 1956 it is situate in
Pudussery, Palakkad District. The company was started in 1982 as M/s. Best
power electrical private limited in 1995. It was started with 5 members.
The registration number
State code
18
Nature of business
17
consolidated, divided into such classes with any preferential, qualified, special or
other rights, privileges or conditions attached there to and be held upon such terms
as may described by the articles of association and regulations of the company for
the time being or otherwise. The liability of the members is limited.
Directors:
Board of directors
Offices
Registered office
Administrative office
18
19
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
C) Other object not included in (A) and (B) above for which the company is
established are
1.
1.
20
To sell, export and deal in all works, plant machinery, tools and utensils,
appliances products and material required for the business of the company.
DIVIDEND
The company in Annual General meeting may declare dividends but no
dividend shall exceed the amount recommended by the Board of Directors of the
company.
Account and Audits
1. The Board shall cause to be kept proper books of accounts with respect to
a. All the" assets and liabilities of the company.
b.
All the sums of money received and expended by the company and
21
certified by an auditor.
3 The board shall appoint the first Auditors who shall hold office till the first
Annual General Meeting.
4 The board may fill up a causal vacancy in the office of the Auditors subject to
the provisions of the companies Act, 1956.
5 The remuneration of Auditors shall be fixed by the company general meeting
except that remuneration of any auditor appointed by the Board shall be fixed
by the Board.
22
Engineering Section
Managers Accounts
Sections
Managers Accounts
Accountant
Clerk
Store Section
Chief Engineer
Typist
Computer
operator
Site
Engineers
Skilled
Workers
Unskilled
Workers
23
Site
Supervisors
Electricians
Drawing
Section
24
installation of electricals equipments and deals all Kerala State Electrical Inspector
makers for companies.
Sister Concerns
The company have a group of sister concern to cater to our needs of
control panels, switch boards and fabricated items and other electrical
equipments / materials.
Panel Fabrication units
The company have the following sister concerns to undertake panel fabrication.
1. Best - O - Fab enterprises, Pudussery, Palakkad
2. Are why industries, Kanjikode, Palakkad.
These two units are equipped with state of the art machinery for fabrication
of industrial and cubic type switch boards, control panels, motor control centers,
distribution boards industrial bus ducts, material handling equipments etc.
Trading Divisions
The following are sister concerns
1.
2.
gears, lighting accessories cables etc. They have a team of marketing engineers.
They deal with products of such reputed makes of materials like Bhartia Culter
Hammer, Alsthom, MDS Legrand, Finoloex, Anchor, Standard Switchgears, HPL
25
26
CHAPTER 4
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
4.1 ANALYSIS OF DATA
Table 4.1
Age group of the respondents
Age group
20 - 30
30 - 40
40 - 50
Above 50
Total
Frequency
1
16
63
20
100
Percent
1.0
16.0
63.0
20.0
100.0
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 63% of the respondents are in the age
group of 30 - 40 years, 20% of the respondents are in the age group of above 50
years, 16% of the respondents are in the age group of 20-30 years and only 1% of
the respondent in the age group of 20 - 30 years.
27
Chart 4.1
Age group of the respondents
28
Table 4.2
Sex of the respondents
Sex
Frequency
Percent
Male
73
73.0
Female
27
27.0
Total
100
100.0
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found nearly 73% of respondents are male and
remaining 23% are female respondents.
29
Chart 4.2
Sex of the respondents
30
Table 4.3
Educational qualification of the respondents
Educational qualification
Frequency
Percent
Under graduate
62
62.0
Post graduate
18
18.0
Diploma
13
13.0
Others
7.0
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 62% of the respondents are under
graduates, 18% of them are post graduates, 13% of them are Diploma qualified
and the remaining 14% of the respondents are having other qualifications.
31
Chart 4.4
Educational qualification of the respondents
32
Table 4.4
Marital status of the respondents
Marital status
Frequency
Percent
Married
97
97.0
Unmarried
3.0
Total
100
100.0
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is depicted that 97% of respondents are married and
remaining only 3% are unmarried respondents.
33
Chart 4.4
Marital status of the respondents
34
Table 4.5
Working Experience of the respondents
Years of experience
Frequency
Percent
1-5 years
2.0
6-10 years
5.0
10 - 15 years
23
23.0
16 - 20 years
42
42.0
Above 20 years
28
18.0
Total
100
100.0
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 42% of the respondents are having
experience of 16-20 years, 28% of them having experience for above 20 years,
23% of the respondents having experience for 10-15 years, 5% of them are have
the experience for 6-10 years and only 2% of the respondents are having 1-5 years
of experience in the organization.
35
Chart 4.5
Working Experience of the respondents
36
Table 4.6
Degree of satisfaction with personnel policies of the company
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Very Good
2.0
Good
80
80.0
Average
18
18.0
Poor
Very Poor
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 80% of the respondents are satisfied
with personnel policies of the organization, 18% of them are satisfied to some
extent and 2% of them are highly satisfied with it.
37
Chart 4.6
Degree of satisfaction with personnel policies of the company
38
Table 4.7
Degree of satisfaction with status of their job in the company
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
4.0
Satisfied
53
53.0
To some extent
33
33.0
Dissatisfied
10
10.0
Highly dissatisfied
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 53% of the respondents are satisfied
with their status of present job in Power Best Electricals , 33% of them are
satisfied to some extent and 10% of them are dissatisfied and only 4% of them are
highly satisfied with it.
39
Chart 4.7
Degree of satisfaction with status of their job in the company
40
Table 4.8
Degree of satisfaction with salary including allowances and other benefits
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
22
22.0
Satisfied
71
71.0
To some extent
7.0
Dissatisfied
Highly dissatisfied
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 71% of the respondents are satisfied
with their salary including allowances and other benefits, 22% of them are highly
satisfied and 7% of them are satisfied to some extent with it.
41
Chart 4.8
Degree of satisfaction with salary including allowances and other benefits
42
Table 4.9
Degree of satisfaction with promotion opportunities
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Very Good
Good
51
51.0
Average
37
37.0
Poor
12
12.0
Very Poor
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 51% of the respondents are satisfied
with their promotion opportunities, 37% of them are satisfied to some extent and
12% of them are dissatisfied with it.
43
Chart 4.9
Degree of satisfaction with promotion opportunities
44
Table 4.10
Degree of satisfaction with job rotation in the organization
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
Satisfied
12
12.0
To some extent
57
57.0
Dissatisfied
21
21.0
Highly dissatisfied
10
10.0
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 57% of the respondents are satisfied
with their job rotation in the organization, 21% of them are dissatisfied, 12% of
them are satisfied, and 10% of them are highly dissatisfied with it.
45
Chart 4.10
Degree of satisfaction with job rotation in the organization
46
Table 4.11
Degree of satisfaction with importance of their job
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
Satisfied
62
62.0
To some extent
37
37.0
Dissatisfied
1.0
Highly dissatisfied
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 62% of the respondents are satisfied
with the importance of their job, 37% of them are satisfied to some extent and 1%
of them are dissatisfied with it.
47
Chart 4.11
Degree of satisfaction with importance of their job
48
Table 4.12
Degree of satisfaction with opportunity to participate in making decision
connected with job
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
6.0
Satisfied
53
53.0
To some extent
32
32.0
Dissatisfied
9.0
Highly dissatisfied
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 53% of the respondents are satisfied
with opportunity to participate in making decision connected with job, 32% of
them are satisfied to some extent and 9% of them are dissatisfied and 6% of them
are highly satisfied.
49
Chart 4.12
Degree of satisfaction with opportunity to participate in making decision
connected with job
50
Table 4.13
Degree of satisfaction with guidance from superiors for doing the job
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
6.0
Satisfied
76
76.0
To some extent
12
12.0
Dissatisfied
6.0
Highly dissatisfied
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 76% of the respondents are satisfied
with guidance from superiors for doing the job, 12% of them are satisfied to some
extent and 6% of them are highly satisfied and dissatisfied respectively with it.
51
Chart 4.13
Degree of satisfaction with guidance from superiors for doing the job
52
Table 4.14
Degree of satisfaction with support and co-operation from subordinates
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
14
14.0
Satisfied
71
71.0
To some extent
15
15.0
Dissatisfied
Highly dissatisfied
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 71% of the respondents are satisfied
with support and co-operation from subordinates, 15% of them are satisfied to
some extent and 14% of them are highly satisfied with it.
53
Chart 4.14
Degree of satisfaction with support and co-operation from subordinates
54
Table 4.15
Degree of satisfaction with training facility / career development
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
5.0
Satisfied
31
31.0
To some extent
55
55.0
Dissatisfied
9.0
Highly dissatisfied
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 55% of the respondents are satisfied to
some extent with training facility / career development, 31% of them are satisfied,
9% of them are dissatisfied and 5% of the are highly satisfied with it.
55
Chart 4.15
Degree of satisfaction with training facility / career development
56
Table 4.16
Degree of satisfaction with job security
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
26
26.0
Satisfied
53
53.0
To some extent
21
21.0
Dissatisfied
Highly dissatisfied
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 53% of the respondents are satisfied
with their job security, 26% of them are highly satisfied and the remaining 21% of
them are satisfied to some extent with it.
57
Chart 4.16
Degree of satisfaction with job security
58
Table 4.17
Degree of satisfaction with employee empowerment
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
19
19.0
Satisfied
32
32.0
To some extent
45
45.0
Dissatisfied
4.0
Highly dissatisfied
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 45% of the respondents are satisfied to
some extent with employee empowerment in the company, 32% of them are
satisfied, 19% of them are satisfied and only 4% of them are dissatisfied with it.
59
Chart 4.17
Degree of satisfaction with employee empowerment
60
Table 4.18
Degree of satisfaction with opportunity to use knowledge and skills
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
Satisfied
21
21.0
To some extent
47
47.0
Dissatisfied
22
22.0
Highly dissatisfied
10
10.0
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 47% of the respondents are satisfied to
some extent with the opportunity to use knowledge and skills in their job, 22% of
them are dissatisfied, 21% of them are satisfied and 10% of them are highly
dissatisfied with it.
61
Chart 4.18
Degree of satisfaction with opportunity to use knowledge and skills
62
Table 4.19
Degree of satisfaction with reward for better work
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Very Good
Good
32
32.0
Average
37
37.0
Poor
21
21.0
Very Poor
10
10.0
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 37% of the respondents are satisfied to
some extent with reward for better work in the organization, 32% of them are
satisfied, 21% of them are dissatisfied and 10% of them are highly dissatisfied
with it.
63
Chart 4.19
Degree of satisfaction with reward for better work
64
Table 4.20
Degree of satisfaction with working environment
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Very Good
6.0
Good
53
53.0
Average
32
32.0
Poor
9.0
Very Poor
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 53% of the respondents are satisfied
with their working environment, 32% of them are satisfied to some extent, 6% of
them are highly satisfied and 7% of them are dissatisfied with it.
65
Chart 4.20
Degree of satisfaction with working environment
66
Table 4.21
Degree of satisfaction with working hours
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
18
18.0
Satisfied
76
76.0
To some extent
6.0
Dissatisfied
0.0
Highly dissatisfied
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 76% of the respondents are satisfied
with their working hours in the company, 18% of them are highly satisfied and 6%
of them are satisfied to some extent with it.
67
Chart 4.21
Degree of satisfaction with working hours
68
Table 4.22
Degree of satisfaction with welfare measures provided by the company
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Very Good
9.0
Good
71
71.0
Average
15
15.0
Poor
5.0
Very Poor
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 71% of the respondents are satisfied
with welfare measures provided by the company, 15% of them are satisfied to
some extent, 9% of them are highly satisfied and 5% of them are dissatisfied with
it.
69
Chart 4.22
Degree of satisfaction with welfare measures provided by the company
70
Table 4.23
Degree of satisfaction with health care facility
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Very Good
5.0
Good
31
31.0
Average
55
55.0
Poor
9.0
Very Poor
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 55% of the respondents are satisfied to
some extent with health care facility in the company, 31% of them are satisfied,
9% of them are dissatisfied and 5% of them are highly satisfied with it.
71
Chart 4.23
Degree of satisfaction with health care facility
72
Table 4.24
Degree of satisfaction with safety measures
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
21
21.0
Satisfied
53
53.0
To some extent
26
26.0
Dissatisfied
Highly dissatisfied
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 53% of the respondents are satisfied
with safety measures in the company, 26% of them are satisfied to some extent and
21% of them are highly satisfied to with it.
73
Chart 4.24
Degree of satisfaction with safety measures
74
Table 4.25
Degree of satisfaction with facilities available at rest room
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
Satisfied
21
21.0
To some extent
47
47.0
Dissatisfied
22
22.0
Highly dissatisfied
10
10.0
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that47% of the respondents are satisfied to
some extent with facilities provided at rest room, 22% of them are dissatisfied,
21% of them are satisfied and 10% of them are highly dissatisfied with it.
75
Chart 4.25
Degree of satisfaction with facilities available at rest room
76
Table 4.26
Degree of satisfaction with quality of food served in canteen
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
Satisfied
62
62.0
To some extent
37
37.0
Dissatisfied
1.0
Highly dissatisfied
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 62% of the respondents are satisfied
with quality of food served in canteen, 37% of them are satisfied to some extent
and 1% of them dissatisfied with it.
77
Chart 4.26
Degree of satisfaction with quality of food served in canteen
78
Table 4.27
Degree of satisfaction with recreation facility
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
6.0
Satisfied
53
53.0
To some extent
32
32.0
Dissatisfied
9.0
Highly dissatisfied
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 53% of the respondents are satisfied
with recreation facilities in the company, 32% of them are satisfied to some extent,
9% of them are dissatisfied and 6% of them are highly satisfied with it.
79
Chart 4.27
Degree of satisfaction with recreation facility
80
Table 4.28
Degree of satisfaction with retirement benefit scheme
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
6.0
Satisfied
76
76.0
To some extent
12
12.0
Dissatisfied
6.0
Highly dissatisfied
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 76% of the respondents are satisfied
with the retirement benefit scheme, 12% of them are satisfied to some extent and
6% of them are highly satisfied and dissatisfied respectively with it.
81
Chart 4.28
Degree of satisfaction with retirement benefit scheme
82
Table 4.29
Degree of satisfaction with medical benefits
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
14
14.0
Satisfied
70
70.0
To some extent
16
16.0
Dissatisfied
Highly dissatisfied
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 70% of the respondents are satisfied
with medical benefits provided by the company, 16% of them are satisfied to some
extent and 14% of them are highly satisfied with it.
83
Chart 4.29
Degree of satisfaction with medical benefits
84
Table 4.30
Degree of satisfaction with accident compensation and other benefits
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
5.0
Satisfied
31
31.0
To some extent
55
55.0
Dissatisfied
9.0
Highly dissatisfied
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 55% of the respondents are satisfied to
some extent with accident compensation and other benefits, 31% of them are
satisfied, 9% of them are dissatisfied and 5% of them are highly satisfied with it.
85
Chart 4.30
Degree of satisfaction with accident compensation and other benefits
86
Table 4.31
Degree of satisfaction organization climate in general
Degree of satisfaction
Frequency
Percent
Highly satisfied
26
26.0
Satisfied
53
53.0
To some extent
21
21.0
Dissatisfied
Highly dissatisfied
100
100.0
Total
INTERPRETATION
From the above table it is found that 53% of the respondents are satisfied
with organization climate in general, 26% of them are highly satisfied and 21% of
them are satisfied to some extent with it.
87
Chart 4.31
Degree of satisfaction organization climate in general
88
CHI-SQUARE TEST
Table 4.32
Educational Qualification of the Respondents and Degree of Satisfaction with
the Status of Present Job
To test the relationship between educational qualification of the respondents
and degree of satisfaction with the status of present job. The hypothesis has been
framed as follows:
Null hypothesis
There is no association between educational qualification of the
respondents and degree of satisfaction with the status of present job.
Alternate hypothesis
There is association between educational qualification of the respondents
and degree of satisfaction with the status of present job.
89
Cross table
Level of satisfaction
Educational
qualification
Highly
satisfied
Satisfied
To
some
extent
Dissatisfied
Total
Under graduate
31
24
62
Post graduate
11
18
Diploma
13
Others
53
33
10
100.0
Total
Degree of freedom =
Calculated value
16.551
Table value
Result
The calculated chi- square value ( 2) is less than the critical value at 5%
level of significance which reveals that the value is significant. So null hypothesis
was rejected. There is no significant association between educational qualification
of the respondents and degree of satisfaction with the status of present job.
90
Table 4.33
Educational Qualification of the Respondents and Degree of Satisfaction with
the promotional opportunities
Null hypothesis
There is no association between educational qualification of the
respondents and degree of satisfaction with the promotional opportunities.
Alternate hypothesis
There is association between educational qualification of the respondents
and degree of satisfaction with the promotional opportunities.
91
Cross Table
Educational
Satisfied
To some
Dissatisfied
Total
qualification
extent
Under graduate
28
25
62
Post graduate
11
18
Diploma
13
Others
51
37
12
100.0
Total
Degree of freedom =
Calculated value
3.523
Table value
Result
The calculated chi- square value ( 2) is less than the critical value at 5%
level of significance which reveals that the value is significant. So null hypothesis
was rejected. There is no significant association between educational qualification
of the respondents and degree of satisfaction with the promotional opportunities.
CHAPTER 5
92
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
53% of the respondents are satisfied with their status of present job in
Power Best Electricals.
8.
71% of the respondents are satisfied with their salary including allowances
and other benefits.
9.
10. 57% of the respondents are satisfied with their job rotation in the
organization.
11. 62% of the respondents are satisfied with the importance of their job.
12. 53% of the respondents are satisfied with opportunity to participate in
making decision connected with job.
13. 76% of the respondents are satisfied with guidance from superiors for doing
the job.
14. 71% of the respondents are satisfied with support and co-operation from
subordinates.
93
15. 55% of the respondents are satisfied to some extent with training facility /
career development.
16. 53% of the respondents are satisfied with their job security.
17. 45% of the respondents are satisfied to some extent with employee
empowerment in the company.
18. 47% of the respondents are satisfied to some extent with the opportunity to
use knowledge and skills in their job.
19. 37% of the respondents are satisfied to some extent with reward for better
work in the organization.
20. 53% of the respondents are satisfied with their working environment.
21. 76% of the respondents are satisfied with their working hours in the
company.
22. 71% of the respondents are satisfied with welfare measures provided by the
company.
23. 55% of the respondents are satisfied to some extent with health care facility
in the company.
24. 53% of the respondents are satisfied with safety measures in the company.
25. 47% of the respondents are satisfied to some extent with facilities provided
at rest room.
26. 62% of the respondents are satisfied with quality of food served in canteen.
94
27. 53% of the respondents are satisfied with recreation facilities in the
company.
28. 76% of the respondents are satisfied with the retirement benefit scheme.
29. 70% of the respondents are satisfied with medical benefits provided by the
company.
30. 55% of the respondents are satisfied to some extent with accident
compensation and other benefits.
31. 53% of the respondents are satisfied with organization climate in general.
32. There is no significant association between educational qualification of the
respondents and degree of satisfaction with the status of present job.
33. There is no significant association between educational qualification of the
respondents and degree of satisfaction with the promotional opportunities.
95
96
5.3 CONCLUSION
The present study was conducted to measure the job satisfaction level of
employees in Power Best Electricals, Palakkad. From the study it was found that
majority of the employees are satisfied with the job. And based on findings
suitable suggestions were given. The management may consider the suggestions
for the betterment of the employees.
97
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
98