Sunteți pe pagina 1din 10

Click

Here
Diese Website verwendet Cookies vonToday's
Google,Question
um ihre Dienste
bereitzustellen,
Anzeigen zu personalisieren
und Zugriffe zu analysieren. Informationen darber, wie du die Website verwendest, werden an Google
weitergegeben. Durch die Nutzung dieser Website erklrst du dich damit einverstanden, dass sie Cookies
verwendet.
WEITERE INFORMATIONEN

OK

HOME POLITY GEOGRAPHY QUICK LOOK GK CURRENT AFFAIRS BIT BANK THINK... About/Contact
Search here.....

Select Language

Search

Powered by

Translate

SUPREME COURT
KALYANSIR.COM

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

The Supreme Court came into existence on January 28, 1950.


It is as an integrated judicial system of Courts that is present in India. (Federation
for Legislature and executive)
The Supreme Court is the apex court (top most in the hierarchy) in the country.
The High Courts are below the Supreme Court.
Under the High Court there is a system of subordinate courts. (District Courts and
other lower courts).
The Supreme Court is the guardian of the Constitution.
The Supreme Court is the guarantor and protector of the Fundamental Rights of
the citizens.
The Security of tenure is provided to the judges by the Constitution. This means

the judges of Supreme Court can be removed by the President only in the manner
and on the grounds mentioned in the Constitution.
The Judges of the Supreme Court do not hold the office during the pleasure of the
President.
(NOTE: We learnt in the previous chapters that the Ministers do not have security
of tenure and they hold the office during the pleasure of the President).
So far how many judges of Supreme Court have been removed?
No Supreme Court judge was removed so far in independent India.

STRENGTH OF SUPREME COURT:


The original strength (1950) of the Supreme Court was eight judges.
This includes one Chief Justice of India (CJI) and seven other judges.
The strength was increased to ten (10) in the year 1956.
The same was increased to thirteen (13) in the year 1966.
It was further increased to seventeen (17) in the year 1977.
The strength was increased to twenty five (25) in the year 1986.
The present strength of Supreme Court is thirty one (31).
The Parliament of India is empowered to increase the strength from time to time.

QUALIFICATIONS OF JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT:


Should be a citizen of India.
Should have been a judge of a High Court(s) for five (5) years.
(OR)
Should have been an advocate of High Court(s) for ten (10) years.
(OR)
Should have been a distinguished jurist in the opinion of the President.

(Note: The Constitution has not prescribed a minimum age for appointment of a
judge of the Supreme Court).

APPOINTMENT OF JUDGES:
The judges of the Supreme Court are appointed by the President.
The Chief Justice of India (CJI) is appointed by the President after consultation
with such judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts as the President deems
necessary.
The other judges are also appointed by the President after consultation with the
Chief Justice of India and such other judges of the Supreme Court and the High
Court as the President deems necessary.

(IMPORTANT: While appointing the other judges of the Supreme Court the
consultation with the Chief Justice of India is obligatory for the President).

From the year 1950 to 1973 a practice has been established that the senior most
judge of the Supreme Court is appointed as the Chief Justice of India.
The convention was violated in the year 1973 when A N Ray was appointed as the
CJI by superseding three senior judges.
In the year 1977 M U Beg was appointed as the CJI by superseding the then
senior most judge of the Supreme Court.
In the year 1993 in the second judges case the Supreme Court ruled that that the
senior most judged of the Supreme Court alone be appointed as the CJI.
OATH:
Oath of office is administered by the President of India.
In the absence of the President some other person appointed by the President
would perform the same.

TENURE (TERM):
A judge holds the office till he/she attains the age of 65 years.
SALARY:

The salaries, privileges, leaves and pensions of the Supreme Court are
determined by the Parliament from time to time.

At present the salary of the Chief Justice of India is Rs. 1, 00,000/- (One Lakh).
The Salary of other Judge of the Supreme Court is 90,000/- (Ninety Thousands).

RESIGNATION:
A judge submits the resignation to the President of India.

IMPEACHMENT OR REMOVAL:
A judge of the Supreme Court can be removed through impeachment.
A judge can be removed from the office by the President on the recommendation
by the Parliament.
There are two grounds that are mentioned in the Constitution for the removal of
judge of the Supreme Court.

Proved Misbehavior
(OR)

Incapacity.

The removal procedure of a Judge of the Supreme Court is initiated either in the
Lok Sabha or in the Rajya Sabha.
If the procedure begins in Lok Sabha.

A removal motion of a Supreme Court judge is signed by 100 members in the


case of Lok Sabha.

The signed removal motion is to be given to the Speaker.

The speaker may admit or refuse to admit the same.

If it is admitted the speaker constitutes a three member committee to


investigate into the charges.
The committee should consist of

v the CJI (OR) a judge of the Supreme Court


v a chief justice of a high court
v A distinguished jurist.

If the committee finds the judge to be guilty of misbehavior or suffering from


incapacity the Lok Sabha can take up the consideration of the motion.

After it is passed in Lok Sabha with a special majority the motion is presented
to the Rajya Sabha.

If it is also passed in the Rajya Sabha with a special majority an address is


presented to the President for the removal of the judge.

The President passes an order removing the judge.

If the procedure begins in Rajya Sabha.

A removal motion of a Supreme Court judge is signed by 50 members in the


case of Rajya Sabha.

The signed removal motion is to be given to the Chairman.

The Chairman may admit or refuse to admit the same.

If it is admitted the Chairman constitutes a three member committee to


investigate into the charges.
The committee should consist of

v the CJI (OR) a judge of the Supreme Court


v a chief justice of a high court
v A distinguished jurist.

If the committee finds the judge to be guilty of misbehavior or suffering from


incapacity the Rajya Sabha can take up the consideration of the motion.

After it is passed in the Rajya Sabha with a special majority the motion is
presented to the Lok Sabha.

If it is also passed in the Lok Sabha with a special majority an address is


presented to the President for the removal of the judge.
The President passes an order removing the judge.

MISCELLANEOUS:
Under Article 121 of the Indian Constitution no discussion shall take place in
Parliament with respect to the conduct of any judge of the Supreme Court or of a
high Court in the discharge of his duties except upon a motion for presenting an
address to the President praying for the removal of the Judge.
In the absence of the CJI the President can appoint a judge of the Supreme Court
as an acting CJI.
The CJI can appoint a judge of a High Court as an ad hoc (temporary) judge of
Supreme Court. (This can be done by the CJI only with the prior permission of the
President).
The CJI can request a retired judge of the Supreme Court or High Court to act as
a judge of the Supreme Court for a temporary period of time.
The Supreme Court of India is located in Delhi.
The CJI can set up the Benches of the Supreme Court of India in other places of
the Country by the CJI with the prior permission of the President.
The Constitutional cases or references made by the President under article 143 of
the Constitution are decided by a bench consisting of at least five judges.
All other cases are usually decided by a bench consisting of not less than three
judges.
The Supreme Court is also a court of records. The judgments of the Supreme
Court are admitted to be of evidentiary value and cannot be questioned when
produced before any court. Secondly, the Supreme Court has also got the power
to punish for the contempt of court.

The Judicial review is the power of the Supreme Court to examine the
constitutionality of legislative enactments and executive orders of both the central
and state governments.

The judicial review is needed to uphold the principle of the supremacy of the
Constitution, to maintain the concept of federalism (balance between the central
and state governments) and also to protect the fundamental rights of the citizens.

Note: The words Judicial Review is not mentioned in the Constitution. (Can you
please think why?)
The Supreme Court used the power of judicial review in

v Golaknath Case
v Bank Nationalization case

1967

1970

v The Privy purses abolition case -

1971

v The Kesavananda Bharti case

1973

v The Minerva Mills case

1980

Please Note: (All the above cases I discuss with you in a separate note under the
title 'Basic structure of the Indian Constitution')

The Supreme Court is the ultimate interpreter of the Constitution.

The election disputes related to the the President and Vice President can
be challenged only in the Supreme Court and the decision of the Supreme Court
shall be final.

THE COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY: This is constituted by the Speaker or Chairman


under judges Inquiry Act.
A Constitution Amendment bill (Private) was introduced in RS by a nominated
member H K Dua to relook at the law to prevent a judge from resigning till any
impeachment motion process is completed. As happened in the case of Calcutta
HC Justice Soumitra Sen in 2011 (later withdrawn after assurance is given by the
law Minister)

Under Articles 124 (2) and 217 (1) if a judge submits resignation to the President
even while facing impeachment the resignation will automatically comes into effect
and the impeachment proceedings will abruptly come to an end. Even if one house
passes a resolution for the removal and the other House will not take it up for
discussion.
Soumitra Sen (Judge of Calcutta High Court) resigned after a resolution is passed

in the Rajya Sabha and before it reaches the Lok Sabha.


Similarly P D Dinakaran resigned when a committee of Inquiry constituted by the
Chairman of RS. Hence both judges escaped scrutiny of their conduct by the
Parliament and likely to be removed by the President.
The present lacuna is that once a judge resigns it is taken as accepted and
President has no role to play.
MISCELLANEOUS:
In December 2012 the CJI Altamas Kabir gave the necessary clarifications to the
PMO on elevating the 2 CJs of High Courts (M Y Eqbal Madras and V
Gopalagowda Madras) to the SC. The PMO sought the clarifications following
certain complaints received by the PMO. The PMO wanted to ascertain whether
the allegations were addressed by the SC Collegium before recommendations
were made for elevation of the 2 judges. The CJI said recommendations were
made after considering all aspects.

Fast Track Courts: The 11th Finance Commission recommended for the
establishment of 1734 fast track courts in the country for the disposal of long
pending sessions and other cases. It is the primary responsibility of the State
Governments to establish these courts in consultation with the concerned High
Court.

DAM 999: (On January 24, 2013 the SC upheld the ban imposed by the TN
government on the release of the movie DAM 999. The TN government banned
the movie on November 24, 2011 alleging that the film was based on the
Mullaperiyar dam dispute between Tamil Nadu and Kerala. The film was released
in entire country except Tamil Nadu. SC said that the Court cannot ignore the
apprehensions raised by the state and consider only the individual rights. We
cannot close our eyes to the objections raised by the state and decide the case
purely on legal aspects and we have to respect the sentiments of the people.
The SC on January 18, 2013 directed all the states not to grant permission for
erecting statues or construction of any structure at public places or on highways
which would obstruct traffic.

India may be among the few countries in the world where judges appoint
themselves. This practice started after 1993, replacing the system of government
picking judges for higher judiciary comprising Supreme Court and 24 High Courts.

JANUARY 30, 2014:

The Supreme Court cleared the decks for the trail of the Chief Minister of Tamil
Nadu Jayalalithaa for her prosecution that was initiated by the Income Tax
Department for non filing of incom4e tax returns during 1991-93 by sasi
enterprises and by herself as partner for 1993-94.

JANUARY 30, 2014:

The killers of Rajiv Gandhi (the former PM) Murugan, Santhan and Perarivalan who
were convicted pleaded the Supreme Court for commutation of their death
sentence to life imprisonment citing the inordinate delay in the disposal of their
mercy petition by the former President Pratibha Patil.
The Madras High Court on August 30, 2011 stayed their execution. In May 2012 the
Supreme Court transferred the case to itself.
MARCH 10, 2014: The Apex court ordered the trail courts for the completion of
trail against members of both the Houses of the Parliament and State legislatures
with in 1 year from the date of framing of the charges against them. If the court
cannot complete the trail within one year because of any reason the court must
explain the reasons to the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court.
July 7, 2014: The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that fatwas have no legal
sanction. It declared that no legal status has been granted to the Sharia courts.
The apex court said that either Darul Qaza or any mufti cannot issue fatwas and
try to enforce against a person who has not approached for religious opinion.The
apex court said that the religion or faith cannot be used to victimize innocents.The
Supreme Court said no law has given any recognition to fatwas.

4 Comments

kalyansir

Share

Recommend

Login

Sort by Best

Join the discussion


Venu Rao

2 years ago

Hello Sir
How come Finance Commission recommends on setting up of Fast Track Courts?
Reply Share

kalyan > Venu Rao

2 years ago

Dear Venu, Its a nice observation from you, I really appreciate your keenness while reading.
The FC also looks into other functions as directed by the President. It recommended for the expeditious disposal of the long
pending cases and also the cases of under trail prisioners, hence its recommended FTCs. The Finance Ministry granted
502 crores and they were set up.
Good Luck
Reply Share

7
ankush goyal

6 months ago

Hello sir
I have doubt that is supreme court have sitting i delhi only??
Reply Share

Amit Shukla

2 years ago

what is the meaning of that SC judge do not hold office during the pleasure of president.
Reply Share

Subscribe

Add Disqus to your site

Privacy

Ads

COPYRIGHT 2013
KALYANSIR.NET (.Com) Republication or re dissemination of the content of this site are expressly prohibited without the written consent of KALYAN SIR.