Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Assessment Tool
Michael A. DePolis
Grand Canyon University: TSL 540
April 24, 2013
Assessment Tool
Assessment Tool
Stage 2 of the Understanding by Design (UbD) matrix will be aligning assessments to the
stated goals and understandings of the lesson. For the expository writing; Traits of Good Writing
lesson from Module 6, enduring understandings will be assessed through the authentic
performance task of a Gallery Walk for students and parents to attend. This task, along with an
open ended short answer quiz, will provide valid assessment of the six traits of good writing. The
final published writing will be scored against an analytic rubric which will provide a score for each
trait. The rubric will align to each essential understanding, and a second rubric will provide insight
into the six facets of understanding (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005).
The Gallery Walk will be a chance for the students to share as published authors their
illustrated stories. This real world assessment will allow for essential understandings to be
revealed.
Diagnostic assessment will come first in the form of a pretest, and ongoing formative
assessment will provide comprehension checks throughout the writing process, including selfassessment and peer review. Summative assessment will be the performance task of talking about
their published writing in the Gallery Walk, final papers scored against the analytic rubric, the six
facets of understanding rubric, and the open ended short answer quiz, to evaluate the knowledge
and skills needed for successful completion of the final published writings.
Alignment of Assessment with Understandings
1. Overarching Essential Understanding 1: Good writers use ideas from their lives and the
lives of others to make their topic truly memorable. Topical Essential Understanding 1:
Students can use their experiences to make good writing.
Assessment: Students will provide a short answer regarding generation of ideas for
writing from their personal experiences. Students will receive a rubric score on ideas on
final writing.
2. Overarching Essential Understanding 2: Good writers organize their writing in a way
that makes it easy to read. Topical Essential Understanding 2: I can learn to organize
my writing to make it understandable.
Assessment Tool
Assessment: Students will provide a short answer about good ways to organize their
writing, based on practiced knowledge and skills. Students will receive a rubric score on
organization on final writing.
3. Overarching Essential Understanding 3: Good writers write in a voice that is unique to
the writer. Topical Essential Understanding 3: Students can find their voice in their
writing.
Assessment: Students will provide a short answer about how they can write in their own
voice. Students will receive a rubric score on voice on final writing.
4. Overarching Essential Understanding 4: Good writers use a variety of interesting
words. Topical Essential Understanding 4: I can use a variety of interesting words in my
writing to make it better.
Assessment: Students will provide a short answer about how they can choose interesting
and informative words. Students will receive a rubric score on word choice on final
writing.
5. Overarching Essential Understanding 5: Good writers make interesting sentences
which flow smoothly. Topical Essential Understanding 5: I can make my writing better
by making fluent sentences.
Assessment: Students will provide a short answer about how they can make their
sentences flow smoothly. Students will receive a rubric score on sentence fluency on
final writing.
6. Overarching Essential Understanding 6: Good writers avoid distracting mistakes.
Topical Essential Understanding: I can make my writing mistake free so that it is not
distracting, and more enjoyable.
Assessment: Students will provide a short answer on how they will find and correct all
mistakes in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Students will receive a rubric score on
conventions on final writing.
All students will receive scores on a rubric of the six facets of understanding,
holistically for each facet.
Assessment Tool
6 The ideas
1 The ideas
with details
has clear
ideas have
are unclear
make the
ideas and
a clear
More
ideas
or off-topic.
essay hold
supporting
focus.
supporting
needs to
the readers
details.
More
details are
be
supporting
needed.
narrower
attention.
details are
or broader.
needed.
There are
not
enough
supporting
details.
3 The ideas 2 The
1 Poor
is well
has a clear
essay has
should be
essay runs
organization
organized
beginning,
some
separated
together.
makes the
Assessment Tool
Voice
and
middle, and
transitions, into
pleasurable
ending, and
and a
paragraphs, need to
to read.
transition
beginning,
with more
separate
words are
middle,
transitions.
ideas.
used.
and
6 The
5 The
ending.
4 The
3 The
2 The
1 The
writers
writers
writers
writers
writers
writers
voice
voice is
voice is
voice is not
through
confident
comes
somewhat
unclear
evident.
with
and
through
unclear.
and is not
enthusiasm
aware of
and
audience.
the time.
the
5 Specific
4 Some
3 Too
audience.
2 Poor
1 The writer
Interesting,
words help
interesting
many
word
needs
informative,
common
choice
strategies to
and varied
writing
choices
words are
makes the
find
words are
interesting.
are made,
chosen.
essay
interesting
but more
difficult to
words.
variety is
read and
confidence.
Word Choice 6
chosen.
Sentence
6 The
needed.
5 The essay 4 The
Fluency
sentences
has
essay has
sentences
sentences
is difficult to
have a nice
sentences
sentences
should be
should be
read
flow which
which flow
rewritten
because the
enhances
smoothly.
smoothly
for a
to flow
sentences
the readers
The essay
most of
smoother
smoothly.
lack fluency.
experience
has a good
the time.
flow.
with the
sound
essay.
when read
6 All
orally.
5 Most
4 Some
3 Several
2 Many
1 A large
Conventions
3 Many
enjoy.
2 Most
1 The essay
Assessment Tool
conventions
grammar,
errors are
errors are
errors
number of
are correct
spelling,
present
distracting
cause the
errors need
adding to
and
which do
to the
essay to be to be
enjoyment
reader.
confusing
from the
and
making the
meaning of
difficult to
essay easy
the essay.
read.
corrected.
to read.
(Kemper, Sebranek, & Meyer, 2006).
Rubric for Six Facets of Understanding
Facet 1:
Facet 2:
Facet 3:
Facet 4:
Facet 5:
Facet 6:
Explanation
Interpretation
Application
Perspective
Empathy
Self-
2 The student
2 The student
2 The student
2 The student
2 The
knowledge
2 The student
is able to
shows
effectively
reveals
student
is reflective
accurately
meaningful
displays
and self-
justify and
insight of the
traits.
personal
empathy
adjusting
explain
writing process
perspective
openly for
understandings
of the writing
the
writing
of the six
traits.
process using
challenges
process and
facing other
writing traits.
1 The student
1 The student
1 The student
1 The student
writers.
1 The
is not able to
does not
does not
student does
is not
justify or
meaningful
effectively
reveal
not display
reflective and
explain
insight.
credible,
empathy
self-
traits.
personal
openly.
adjusting.
understandings.
perspective.
(Wiggins & McTighe, 2005).
As I self-assess the Gallery Walk with the following two questions, I feel more confident with
my assessments, and the criteria chosen, as evidence of enduring understandings.
Assessment Tool
1. Can a student do well on this performance task without really demonstrating the
understandings that I want?
2. Could a student do poorly on this performance task and still have significant
understandings?
I would answer no to these questions, especially considering the extended practice, rewriting,
and the short answer quiz of knowledge and skills. It is considered that this performance task of
the Gallery Walk will provide valid evidence of understandings. Reliability will need to be
demonstrated over time with similar groups of students (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005).
References
Kemper, D., Sebranek, P. & Meyer, V. (2006). Write source: A book for writing, thinking, and
learning. Houghton Mifflin Company.
Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, Virginia USA.