Non-Initiates Performing Arcana

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.
org
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
IndiaDivine.org
Existing user? Sign In !
Sign Up
Submit New Articles on

Hinduism
You can help us by becoming an author and
submitting articles on Hinduism, Yoga,
Meditation, Ayurveda, Vastu, Vedic
Astrology, or about your spiritual trips to
temples and holy places in India.
Become an Author
Articles
Forums
Downloads
Gallery
Online Users
Search...
"
Activity
http://www.indiadivine.org/content/topic/1260105-non-initiates-performing-arcana/
Page 1 of 53
non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
$ Home IndiaDivine.org Forums on Hinduism The Hare Krishna Forum non-initiates performing arcana
& Sign in to follow this
All Activity
Followers
non-initiates performing arcana

Started by Guest guest, 6 Jun 2004
Rate this topic:
Start new topic
Reply to this topic
17 posts in this topic
Guest guest
Posted 6 Jun 2004 Report post
Dear Bhadra Govinda prabhu,

Please accept my humble obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada.
Guests
Thank you for your letter.

> Ideally speaking the standard is - initiated have to perform arcana.
> However we have to choose the best among the available lot for any
> service. Like if no one is present Srila Prabhupada said it is ok for
> a woman during her monthly cycle perform arcana, but we must not
stop
> seva.
>
> This is my understanding. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Yes this is correct, but she should be a brahmana. It is not acceptable for
non-brahmanas to do temple worship in ISKCON.
Your servant,
Nrsimha Kavaca dasa
Please visit our website: http://www.deityworship.com
+
Quote
Page 2 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
Help Feed Needy Children in India

If you enjoy these articles please consider helping us to feed needy children in India
through the Bhaktivedanta Ashram (FoodRelief.org):
Food Distribution in Chinnapuram Village, Andhra

Pradesh
Guest guest
> Yes this is correct, but she should be a brahmana. It is not acceptable
for
> non-brahmanas to do temple worship in ISKCON.
Guests
Yes prabhu. Agreed.

Ideally she / he should be brahmana. Ideally if a brahmana (he/she) is
Page 3 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
available she should do arcana. I am not telling that we may condone this
requirement and allow sudras on to the altar when qualified brahmanas
are
around. What I am saying is *If* brahmana is not available then some one
else may be allowed to perform the seva, but seva may not be stopped.
Ideally doctor must give medication, but in case of accident when no
qualified doctor is available then any one around may be allowed to give
some first aid / medication and not just wait for the doctor to come.
When Srila Prabhupada went to USA there were no brahmanas waiting for
him
there, but ...........he chose the best among the available lot and trained
them up and allowed them to do the seva inspite of all short comings.
There
is his famous prayer to the dieties in Australia that he prayed, he was
leaving Them in the hands of unqualified people but Krishna may guide
them
through the heart.
If only we did not forget how we all started deity
worship...................
I had my Gaura Nitai deities at home when I did not have even my first
initiation. I was chanting 16 malas, 4 regulative principles, oering
bhoga, mangalarati etc,. and waiting for 1st initiation. Purascharya??.
Your humble servant,
Bhadra Govinda Dasa.
+
Guest guest
Quote
Dear Bhadra Govinda dasa, PAMHO AGTSP

On Jun 7, 2004, at 4:12 AM, Bhadra Govinda Dasa wrote:
Guests
>> Yes this is correct, but she should be a brahmana. It is not

>> acceptable for
>> non-brahmanas to do temple worship in ISKCON.
>
> Yes prabhu. Agreed.
>
Page 4 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> Ideally she / he should be brahmana. Ideally if a brahmana (he/she)

> is
> available she should do arcana. I am not telling that we may condone
> this
> requirement and allow sudras on to the altar when qualified brahmanas
> are
> around. What I am saying is *If* brahmana is not available then some
> one
> else may be allowed to perform the seva, but seva may not be stopped.
> Ideally doctor must give medication, but in case of accident when no
> qualified doctor is available then any one around may be allowed to
> give
> some first aid / medication and not just wait for the doctor to come.
There is a dierence between giving CPR or basic first aid at an
accident and giving medication which has to be prescribed by a licensed
physician. Many times emergency operators tell people to do nothing
until the emergency medical technicians arrive. In other cases they
give instructions to people to give basic assistance. But if a
bystander were to try to actually administer complex medical procedures
without a license even at an accident he would be later liable to be
prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. As a fully trained medic
first aid instructor I am certainly aware of these facts at least
according to US Law. So I do not accept this analogy as being suitable.
You do not seem to be listening to what Nrsimha Kavacha Prabhu is
saying. To my knowledge there is NO ISKCON Temple (with or without
deities) run by completely uninitiated devotees. So if there is an
ISKCON Temple with deities there is certainly some initiated devotees.
Those devotees should, amongst themselves do the cooking and deity
worship. They should NOT delegate these duties to others who are not
initiated. And specifically those engaged in cooking and deity worship
should have 2nd initiation. Do you understand? There is probably NO
situation where an ISKCON Temple with deities is being completely run
by NON-initiated devotees. And if such a situation occurs then either
the GBC member for that area should send some 2nd initiate to take
charge and do the seva or He should arrange for whoever is doing it to
get initiated or He should move the deities to a place where they can
be properly looked after by 2nd initiated devotees.
> When Srila Prabhupada went to USA there were no brahmanas waiting
for
> him
> there, but ...........he chose the best among the available lot and
Page 5 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> trained
> them up and allowed them to do the seva inspite of all short comings.
Your assertion that Srila Prabhupada Himself had non-brahmanas cooking
and doing deity worship is incorrect. It may have been the case in 1965
when NO ONE was initiated. But as soon as devotees began to be
initiated the standard was and always will be, as Srila Prabhupada
instituted and wanted, that ONLY 2nd initiates do the cooking and deity
worship.
> There
> is his famous prayer to the dieties in Australia that he prayed, he was
> leaving Them in the hands of unqualified people but Krishna may guide
> them
> through the heart.
Yes, Srila Prabhupada prayed to Radha Gopinatha in Sydney, Australia. I
know this as I was their Head Pujari for many years. But he initiated
many devotees to look after them at the time when he made that prayer.
He did not just make a prayer and let non initiates worship them. It is
not correct to come to that conclusion from this story. Please don't
try to quote stories like this when I know very well the full
circumstances involved. Srila Prabhupada considered the devotees to be
unqualified in Australia, true, but he still gave them a chance to
worship Radha Gopinatha by taking those devotees and giving them 2nd
initiation so that they could worship the deities. Similarly we are all
unqualified to worship the Supreme Lord Sri Krsna but by the grace of
our Spiritual Master Srila Prabhupada we have been given the chance to
serve the Lord. Srila Prabhupada gave us that chance to serve the Lord
by giving us the sacred thread and gayatri mantras and also initiating
us into the chanting of the Hare Krsna Mahamantra, and he instructed us
to always keep the highest standard of deity worship and have ONLY 2nd
initiates cook and worship the deities. Please help to keep this
standard if you truly want to please Srila Prabhupada.
> If only we did not forget how we all started deity
> worship...................
>
> I had my Gaura Nitai deities at home when I did not have even my first
> initiation. I was chanting 16 malas, 4 regulative principles, oering
> bhoga, mangalarati etc,. and waiting for 1st initiation.
> Purascharya??.
That's very nice. But that is Home worship. We are talking about Temple
Page 6 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
worship here. Even for Home worship it is best to be 2nd initiated for
performing. In India in Vaisnava households the children cannot even
enter the house kitchen until they are initiated. Although the Holy
Name does not require formal initiation and is all that we need to
worship the Lord in this age of Kali. Still all the previous Acharyas
including Srila Prabhupada have encouraged us to take initiation as a
prerequisite to the performance of devotional service. Once the bhakti
lata bija or seed of devotion is planted in the heart of the disciple
at the time of initiation by the Guru then the activities of hearing,
chanting, worshiping, etc will begin to water and fertilize that seed.
Until then any service that we do is simply ploughing the field waiting
for the seed to be planted. No doubt there is eternal benefit from
performing these activities even before initiation. However the correct
method is to first take 2nd initiation and then learn the system of
deity worship under the guidance of the Spiritual Master and other
advanced Vaisnavas.
ys
Gaura Keshava dasa
PS I noticed that your email address is raganuga (AT) cyberway (DOT)
com.sg.
Please do not make the mistake of thinking that there are no rules and
regulations in raganuga bhakti or that this stage can be artificially
attained by those who disregard the process of vaidhi bhakti and/or
pancaratric diksha.
+
Guest guest
Quote
Dear Prabhu,
Namo Namah!! All glories to Srila Prabhupada!!!
Guests
All I said is "we have to choose the best among the available lot". This is
true in any situation. It does not matter whether it is in temple or home
or in road accident. I read your lengthy mail, and it seems you are in
complete agreement on this point. Only thing is I am saying "son-in-law"
and you are saying "daughter's husband"
Srila Prabhupada neither wanted us to become sahajiyas with out
Page 7 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
following
any rules and regulations nor he wanted us to become *caste*
brahmanas.
Niyamagraha!!
In ISKCON 99% are home dieties. I just wanted to make sure these 99%
population are not neglected when we are discussing. By the way Srila
Prabhupada wanted every home to be a temple.
There are some households where I personally placed pictures of Radha
Krishna / Gaura Nitai and taught them basic arati, bhoga oering and later
they have taken first initiation.
samo damas tapah saucam
ksantir arjavam eva ca
jnanam vijnanam astikyam
brahma karma svabavajam.
And please do not make the mistake that a person having e-mail address
*raganuga* is claiming himself to be ranganuga, just as mistaking a person
named Krishna is claiming himself to be lord Krishna. Thanks for asking
and I am happy to clarify.
Hare Krishna,
Your most humble servant,
"Gregory Jay" <gregjay (AT) softhome (DOT) net>
"Bhadra Govinda Dasa" <raganuga (AT) cyberway (DOT) com.sg>
Cc: "Nrsimha Kavaca (das) IDS" <Nrsimha.Kavaca.IDS (AT) pamho (DOT)
net>; "Tattvavit
(das) ACBSP (BBT)" <Tattvavit.ACBSP (AT) pamho (DOT) net>; "India
(Continental
Committee) Open (Forum)" <India.Open (AT) pamho (DOT) net>
Tuesday, June 08, 2004 6:19 AM
Re: non-initiates performing arcana
> Dear Bhadra Govinda dasa, PAMHO AGTSP

>
> On Jun 7, 2004, at 4:12 AM, Bhadra Govinda Dasa wrote:
>
Page 8 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> >> Yes this is correct, but she should be a brahmana. It is not
> >> acceptable for
> >> non-brahmanas to do temple worship in ISKCON.
>>
> > Yes prabhu. Agreed.
>>
> > Ideally she / he should be brahmana. Ideally if a brahmana (he/she)
> > is
> > available she should do arcana. I am not telling that we may condone
> > this
> > requirement and allow sudras on to the altar when qualified
brahmanas
> > are
> > around. What I am saying is *If* brahmana is not available then some
> > one
> > else may be allowed to perform the seva, but seva may not be
stopped.
> > Ideally doctor must give medication, but in case of accident when no
> > qualified doctor is available then any one around may be allowed to
> > give
> > some first aid / medication and not just wait for the doctor to come.
>
> There is a dierence between giving CPR or basic first aid at an
> accident and giving medication which has to be prescribed by a
licensed
> physician. Many times emergency operators tell people to do nothing
> until the emergency medical technicians arrive. In other cases they
> give instructions to people to give basic assistance. But if a
> bystander were to try to actually administer complex medical
procedures
> without a license even at an accident he would be later liable to be
> prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. As a fully trained medic
> first aid instructor I am certainly aware of these facts at least
> according to US Law. So I do not accept this analogy as being suitable.
>
> You do not seem to be listening to what Nrsimha Kavacha Prabhu is
> saying. To my knowledge there is NO ISKCON Temple (with or without
> deities) run by completely uninitiated devotees. So if there is an
> ISKCON Temple with deities there is certainly some initiated devotees.
> Those devotees should, amongst themselves do the cooking and deity
> worship. They should NOT delegate these duties to others who are not
> initiated. And specifically those engaged in cooking and deity worship
> should have 2nd initiation. Do you understand? There is probably NO
> situation where an ISKCON Temple with deities is being completely run
Page 9 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> by NON-initiated devotees. And if such a situation occurs then either

> the GBC member for that area should send some 2nd initiate to take
> charge and do the seva or He should arrange for whoever is doing it to
> get initiated or He should move the deities to a place where they can
> be properly looked after by 2nd initiated devotees.
>
> > When Srila Prabhupada went to USA there were no brahmanas
waiting for
> > him
> > there, but ...........he chose the best among the available lot and
> > trained
> > them up and allowed them to do the seva inspite of all short comings.
>
> Your assertion that Srila Prabhupada Himself had non-brahmanas
cooking
> and doing deity worship is incorrect. It may have been the case in 1965
> when NO ONE was initiated. But as soon as devotees began to be
> initiated the standard was and always will be, as Srila Prabhupada
> instituted and wanted, that ONLY 2nd initiates do the cooking and deity
> worship.
>
> > There
> > is his famous prayer to the dieties in Australia that he prayed, he was
> > leaving Them in the hands of unqualified people but Krishna may
guide
> > them
> > through the heart.
>
> Yes, Srila Prabhupada prayed to Radha Gopinatha in Sydney, Australia.
I
> know this as I was their Head Pujari for many years. But he initiated
> many devotees to look after them at the time when he made that prayer.
> He did not just make a prayer and let non initiates worship them. It is
> not correct to come to that conclusion from this story. Please don't
> try to quote stories like this when I know very well the full
> circumstances involved. Srila Prabhupada considered the devotees to
be
> unqualified in Australia, true, but he still gave them a chance to
> worship Radha Gopinatha by taking those devotees and giving them
2nd
> initiation so that they could worship the deities. Similarly we are all
> unqualified to worship the Supreme Lord Sri Krsna but by the grace of
> our Spiritual Master Srila Prabhupada we have been given the chance to
> serve the Lord. Srila Prabhupada gave us that chance to serve the Lord
Page 10 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> by giving us the sacred thread and gayatri mantras and also initiating
> us into the chanting of the Hare Krsna Mahamantra, and he instructed
us
> to always keep the highest standard of deity worship and have ONLY
2nd
> initiates cook and worship the deities. Please help to keep this
> standard if you truly want to please Srila Prabhupada.
>
> > If only we did not forget how we all started deity
> > worship...................
>>
> > I had my Gaura Nitai deities at home when I did not have even my first
> > initiation. I was chanting 16 malas, 4 regulative principles, oering
> > bhoga, mangalarati etc,. and waiting for 1st initiation.
> > Purascharya??.
>
> That's very nice. But that is Home worship. We are talking about Temple
> worship here. Even for Home worship it is best to be 2nd initiated for
> performing. In India in Vaisnava households the children cannot even
> enter the house kitchen until they are initiated. Although the Holy
> Name does not require formal initiation and is all that we need to
> worship the Lord in this age of Kali. Still all the previous Acharyas
> including Srila Prabhupada have encouraged us to take initiation as a
> prerequisite to the performance of devotional service. Once the bhakti
> lata bija or seed of devotion is planted in the heart of the disciple
> at the time of initiation by the Guru then the activities of hearing,
> chanting, worshiping, etc will begin to water and fertilize that seed.
> Until then any service that we do is simply ploughing the field waiting
> for the seed to be planted. No doubt there is eternal benefit from
> performing these activities even before initiation. However the correct
> method is to first take 2nd initiation and then learn the system of
> deity worship under the guidance of the Spiritual Master and other
> advanced Vaisnavas.
>
> ys
>
> Gaura Keshava dasa
>
> PS I noticed that your email address is raganuga (AT) cyberway (DOT)
com.sg.
> Please do not make the mistake of thinking that there are no rules and
> regulations in raganuga bhakti or that this stage can be artificially
> attained by those who disregard the process of vaidhi bhakti and/or
> pancaratric diksha.
Page 11 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
>
+
Guest guest
Quote
Dear Bhadra Govindaji, PAMHO AGTSP

Guests
> All I said is "we have to choose the best among the available lot".
> This is
> true in any situation. It does not matter whether it is in temple or
> home
> or in road accident.
Actually it does matter. Nrsimha Kavaca mentioned to you Srila
Prabhupada's standard for ISKCON Temple worship. I have told you that
there are NO ISKCON Temples without initiated devotees. Therefore you
have to accept Srila Prabhupada's standard that only 2nd initiates cook
and do arcana in ISKCON Temples.
As far as Home worship is concerned in India the system is the same. In
the homes of ISKCON members or friends there may be some
dierences,
as Srila Prabhupada was not specific on this point of home worship to
my knowledge. However that does not change the fact that any Vaisnava
in India will tell you that one needs to be properly initiated to
perform Vaisnava Pancaratric worship either in the home or temple.
> I read your lengthy mail, and it seems you are in
> complete agreement on this point. Only thing is I am saying
> "son-in-law"
> and you are saying "daughter's husband"
You may be reading my email but you are not understanding my point if
you still keep insisting that non-initiates can do puja in ISKCON
Temples. Why? There is no need for this to go on. It is quite simple
for one to get initiated. 4 regs, 16 rounds etc. In a short time one
may be initiated. Then why is it necessary for one to do puja who is
not initiated. Let those persons chant Hare Krsna and then when they
become properly qualified and accepted by a Spiritual Master and
initiated they can begin their arcana training. This is the way in
Page 12 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
which Srila Prabhupada and all the previous Acharyas have shown us how
to act. Mahajano yena gatah sah pantah. And it is also confirmed by
sastra. The system of Pancaratric worship is laid out clearly in the
sastras and amongst the initial requirements is Pancaratric diksha.
Sruti smrit puranadi pancaratra vidim vina. So called devotional
service that disregards the injunctions of the sruti smrti purana and
pancaratra literatures is simply a disturbance in society.
> Srila Prabhupada neither wanted us to become sahajiyas with out
> following
> any rules and regulations nor he wanted us to become *caste*
> brahmanas.
> Niyamagraha!!
Again you are trying to wrap yourself in the flag. When people say
things like this they think that they can substantiate their point by
saying that Srila Prabhupada did not want us to follow his instructions
strictly. This is not a fact. You tried to give that example of the
accident. I have shown you how that is not applicable. Then you tried
to show the example of Srila Prabhupada praying to Radha Gopinatha.
However since I was their pujari I know very well that Srila Prabhupada
did not leave them to be worshipped by non-initiated devotees. NO, on
the contrary He initiated many devotees and engaged those 2nd initiated
devotees only in their worship. Therefore you have not given any
instance where there was an ISKCON Temple in which Srila Prabhupada
allowed non-initiates to cook or do deity worship. If you cannot give
such an example please desist in misleading others on this point.
> In ISKCON 99% are home dieties. I just wanted to make sure these
99%
> population are not neglected when we are discussing. By the way Srila
> Prabhupada wanted every home to be a temple.
Home deities are NOT ISKCON deities. Their care and worship are taken
care of by the individual householders. It is not the responsibility of
the GBC or other authorities in ISKCON to see that the home worship of
individual's deities goes on. However it is certainly the
responsibility of the ISKCON authorities to see that the worship in the
ISKCON Temples goes on.
As far as saying that "every home should be a temple" please do not
confuse these two concepts. Of course Srila Prabhupada allowed
householders to have their separate homes but he encouraged people to
worship the Lord first of all in the Temples and then secondly also in
Page 13 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
their own homes. But he made a distinction between the two which you
seem to be trying to blurr here. There is indeed a great dierence
between ISKCON Temples and Householder's Homes. Therefore it is NOT
correct to say that Srila Prabhupada wanted every home to be a temple,
in the sense of an ocial ISKCON Temple. If this were the case then
all householders would need to sign over the deed to their homes to
several ISKCON trustees before having deities there. It is a
requirement of Srila Prabhupada's that all ISKCON Temples with deities
not be mortgaged and that the land should be held in trust by several
ISKCON Trustees. Please read His Divine Grace's Last Will and Testament
if you do not agree. Therefore once again I ask you not to confuse
issues by writing things that cannot be substantiated, are not clearly
stated, and are not the actual standard instituted by Srila Prabhupada.
If there is an ISKCON Temple where there are deities and that Temple is
completely run by 2nd initiated female devotees and there are NO 2nd
initiated male devotees (To my knowledge there are no such ISKCON
Temples). And further if all those 2nd initiated women find themselves
contaminated by their monthly periods at the same time. Then I can see
the point of allowing them to continue and do the puja so that it may
not be stopped.
I would like you to also please quote this quote from Srila Prabhupada
completely. You seem not to have included the last part of the quote.
That is after saying this, Srila Prabhupada said "But it is better not
to do." This means that although he made such a statement he wanted us
to avoid circumstances where that needed to be applied. I have shown
how it is extremely unlikely such a circumstance would arise. It is up
to the true follower of Srila Prabhupada to try to avoid such a
situation, not to make excuses why His Divine Grace's actual standard
cannot be followed.
> There are some households where I personally placed pictures of Radha
> Krishna / Gaura Nitai and taught them basic arati, bhoga oering and
> later
> they have taken first initiation.
That's nice. As I said above Srila Prabhupada was not very specific
about the standards for home worship. And Srila Jayapataka Maharaja
has
certainly been successful with this type of preaching to congregational
householders whether they be initiated or not. But the fact of the
matter is that Pancaratric worship whether in the home or in the temple
ACTUALLY requires Pancaratric diksha so you should not confuse this
Page 14 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
system of congregational preaching with Srila Prabhupada's instructions

for ISKCON Temple worship. What you have described was not a system
instituted by Srila Prabhupada.
> samo damas tapah saucam
> ksantir arjavam eva ca
> jnanam vijnanam astikyam
> brahma karma svabavajam.
Sorry I don't understand why you are quoting this sloka. This sloka
describes the qualities of a brahmana. However the real point of this
whole discussion is NOT brahmanas. Actually when we speak of
"brahmanas
in ISKCON" we actually mean those with Pancaratric diksha. They are
more than brahmanas, they are Vaisnavas. So it is not a caste issue. We
don't have restrictions like that. However we do have the restriction
that one must have Pancaratic diskha (2nd initiation) in order to cook
or do deity worship in ISKCON Temples.
> And please do not make the mistake that a person having e-mail
address
> *raganuga* is claiming himself to be ranganuga, just as mistaking a
> person
> named Krishna is claiming himself to be lord Krishna. Thanks for
> asking
> and I am happy to clarify.
I would certainly be happy to know the reason you use "raganuga" as an
email address. Even though it does not necessarily mean anything, it
seems strange to use this word in this way if absolutely nothing is
meant by it. It may also mislead others. Just as one may use the email
address "puredevotee (AT) hotmail (DOT) com" yet why would one do so?
The usual
system of email identification is that the first part before the @ "at"
sign indicates the person or topic. Don't you agree?
ys
Gaura Keshava dasa
+
Guest guest
Quote
Page 15 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
Still I cannot understand why you are putting so many words in my mouth.
You are saying things which I never said.
Hare Krishna,
Guests
YHS
net>; "Tattvavit
(Continental
Thursday, June 10, 2004 12:37 PM
> Dear Bhadra Govindaji, PAMHO AGTSP

>
> On Jun 8, 2004, at 6:48 AM, Bhadra Govinda Dasa wrote:
>
> > All I said is "we have to choose the best among the available lot".
> > This is
> > true in any situation. It does not matter whether it is in temple or
> > home
> > or in road accident.
>
> Actually it does matter. Nrsimha Kavaca mentioned to you Srila
> Prabhupada's standard for ISKCON Temple worship. I have told you
that
> there are NO ISKCON Temples without initiated devotees. Therefore you
> have to accept Srila Prabhupada's standard that only 2nd initiates cook
> and do arcana in ISKCON Temples.
>
> As far as Home worship is concerned in India the system is the same. In
> the homes of ISKCON members or friends there may be some
dierences,
> as Srila Prabhupada was not specific on this point of home worship to
> my knowledge. However that does not change the fact that any
Vaisnava
> in India will tell you that one needs to be properly initiated to
Page 16 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> perform Vaisnava Pancaratric worship either in the home or temple.

>
> > I read your lengthy mail, and it seems you are in
> > complete agreement on this point. Only thing is I am saying
> > "son-in-law"
> > and you are saying "daughter's husband"
>
> You may be reading my email but you are not understanding my point if
> you still keep insisting that non-initiates can do puja in ISKCON
> Temples. Why? There is no need for this to go on. It is quite simple
> for one to get initiated. 4 regs, 16 rounds etc. In a short time one
> may be initiated. Then why is it necessary for one to do puja who is
> not initiated. Let those persons chant Hare Krsna and then when they
> become properly qualified and accepted by a Spiritual Master and
> initiated they can begin their arcana training. This is the way in
> which Srila Prabhupada and all the previous Acharyas have shown us
how
> to act. Mahajano yena gatah sah pantah. And it is also confirmed by
> sastra. The system of Pancaratric worship is laid out clearly in the
> sastras and amongst the initial requirements is Pancaratric diksha.
> Sruti smrit puranadi pancaratra vidim vina. So called devotional
> service that disregards the injunctions of the sruti smrti purana and
> pancaratra literatures is simply a disturbance in society.
>
> > Srila Prabhupada neither wanted us to become sahajiyas with out
> > following
> > any rules and regulations nor he wanted us to become *caste*
> > brahmanas.
> > Niyamagraha!!
>
> Again you are trying to wrap yourself in the flag. When people say
> things like this they think that they can substantiate their point by
> saying that Srila Prabhupada did not want us to follow his instructions
> strictly. This is not a fact. You tried to give that example of the
> accident. I have shown you how that is not applicable. Then you tried
> to show the example of Srila Prabhupada praying to Radha Gopinatha.
> However since I was their pujari I know very well that Srila Prabhupada
> did not leave them to be worshipped by non-initiated devotees. NO, on
> the contrary He initiated many devotees and engaged those 2nd
initiated
> devotees only in their worship. Therefore you have not given any
> instance where there was an ISKCON Temple in which Srila Prabhupada
> allowed non-initiates to cook or do deity worship. If you cannot give
> such an example please desist in misleading others on this point.
Page 17 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
>
> > In ISKCON 99% are home dieties. I just wanted to make sure these
99%
> > population are not neglected when we are discussing. By the way
Srila
> > Prabhupada wanted every home to be a temple.
>
> Home deities are NOT ISKCON deities. Their care and worship are taken
> care of by the individual householders. It is not the responsibility of
> the GBC or other authorities in ISKCON to see that the home worship of
> individual's deities goes on. However it is certainly the
> responsibility of the ISKCON authorities to see that the worship in the
> ISKCON Temples goes on.
>
> As far as saying that "every home should be a temple" please do not
> confuse these two concepts. Of course Srila Prabhupada allowed
> householders to have their separate homes but he encouraged people
to
> worship the Lord first of all in the Temples and then secondly also in
> their own homes. But he made a distinction between the two which you
> seem to be trying to blurr here. There is indeed a great dierence
> between ISKCON Temples and Householder's Homes. Therefore it is
NOT
> correct to say that Srila Prabhupada wanted every home to be a temple,
> in the sense of an ocial ISKCON Temple. If this were the case then
> all householders would need to sign over the deed to their homes to
> several ISKCON trustees before having deities there. It is a
> requirement of Srila Prabhupada's that all ISKCON Temples with deities
> not be mortgaged and that the land should be held in trust by several
> ISKCON Trustees. Please read His Divine Grace's Last Will and
Testament
> if you do not agree. Therefore once again I ask you not to confuse
> issues by writing things that cannot be substantiated, are not clearly
> stated, and are not the actual standard instituted by Srila Prabhupada.
>
> If there is an ISKCON Temple where there are deities and that Temple is
> completely run by 2nd initiated female devotees and there are NO 2nd
> initiated male devotees (To my knowledge there are no such ISKCON
> Temples). And further if all those 2nd initiated women find themselves
> contaminated by their monthly periods at the same time. Then I can see
> the point of allowing them to continue and do the puja so that it may
> not be stopped.
>
> I would like you to also please quote this quote from Srila Prabhupada
Page 18 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> completely. You seem not to have included the last part of the quote.
> That is after saying this, Srila Prabhupada said "But it is better not
> to do." This means that although he made such a statement he wanted
us
> to avoid circumstances where that needed to be applied. I have shown
> how it is extremely unlikely such a circumstance would arise. It is up
> to the true follower of Srila Prabhupada to try to avoid such a
> situation, not to make excuses why His Divine Grace's actual standard
> cannot be followed.
>
> > There are some households where I personally placed pictures of
Radha
> > Krishna / Gaura Nitai and taught them basic arati, bhoga oering and
> > later
> > they have taken first initiation.
>
> That's nice. As I said above Srila Prabhupada was not very specific
> about the standards for home worship. And Srila Jayapataka Maharaja
has
> certainly been successful with this type of preaching to congregational
> householders whether they be initiated or not. But the fact of the
> matter is that Pancaratric worship whether in the home or in the temple
> ACTUALLY requires Pancaratric diksha so you should not confuse this
> system of congregational preaching with Srila Prabhupada's
instructions
> for ISKCON Temple worship. What you have described was not a
system
> instituted by Srila Prabhupada.
>
> > samo damas tapah saucam
> > ksantir arjavam eva ca
> > jnanam vijnanam astikyam
> > brahma karma svabavajam.
>
> Sorry I don't understand why you are quoting this sloka. This sloka
> describes the qualities of a brahmana. However the real point of this
> whole discussion is NOT brahmanas. Actually when we speak of
"brahmanas
> in ISKCON" we actually mean those with Pancaratric diksha. They are
> more than brahmanas, they are Vaisnavas. So it is not a caste issue. We
> don't have restrictions like that. However we do have the restriction
> that one must have Pancaratic diskha (2nd initiation) in order to cook
> or do deity worship in ISKCON Temples.
>
Page 19 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> > And please do not make the mistake that a person having e-mail
address
> > *raganuga* is claiming himself to be ranganuga, just as mistaking a
> > person
> > named Krishna is claiming himself to be lord Krishna. Thanks for
> > asking
> > and I am happy to clarify.
>
> I would certainly be happy to know the reason you use "raganuga" as
an
> email address. Even though it does not necessarily mean anything, it
> seems strange to use this word in this way if absolutely nothing is
> meant by it. It may also mislead others. Just as one may use the email
> address "puredevotee (AT) hotmail (DOT) com" yet why would one do
so? The usual
> system of email identification is that the first part before the @ "at"
> sign indicates the person or topic. Don't you agree?
>
> ys
>
> Gaura Keshava dasa
>
+
Guest guest
Quote

Guests

> Ideally she / he should be brahmana. Ideally if a brahmana (he/she) is
> available she should do arcana. I am not telling that we may condone
this
> requirement and allow sudras on to the altar when qualified brahmanas
are
> around. What I am saying is *If* brahmana is not available then some
one
> else may be allowed to perform the seva, but seva may not be stopped.
I would like to stress here that this understanding is not correct. Ideally
Page 20 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
is not an option. The sevait for the deity in an ISKCON temple must be a
brahmana, no matter which deities are being worshiped. Srila Prabhupada
was
adamant on this point. It is with such rationale that standards slip in
ISKCON.
As far as home worship is concerned please read the following quote from
Srila Prabhupada.
It is not necessary to be a Brahmin to have home altar,
Letter to: Mangalamaya, Madhupuri Calcutta 20 February, 1972
> All I said is "we have to choose the best among the available lot". This
> is true in any situation.
I cannot agree with this. It is not your right to choose in this situation.
The process of worship has been given by Krsna Himself. dharman to
saksat
bhagavat pranitam. Deity worship is a process of religion and only
bhagavan
can give religion. It is not up to us to change it at our whim.
> Srila Prabhupada neither wanted us to become sahajiyas with out
following
> any rules and regulations nor he wanted us to become *caste*
brahmanas.
> Niyamagraha!!
He wanted us to worship the deity according to rules and regulations of
deity worship, otherwise it would become idolatry. One of the first rules of
temple worship is that it is done by brahmanas. If we do not follow this
then we have certainly slipped into niyamagraha, rejecting the rules and
regulations of the scriptures (deity worship) and working independently or
whimsically.
> In ISKCON 99% are home dieties. I just wanted to make sure these
99%
> population are not neglected when we are discussing. By the way Srila
> Prabhupada wanted every home to be a temple.
This may be. Home worship is a completely dierent proposition from
temple
worship. If the assertion you are making is in relation to home worship
Page 21 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
then
I agree, however it is not correct for the deity in the temple to be
worshiped by non-brahmanas.
I hope this is clear to you prabhu.
Your servant,
Nrsimha Kavaca dasa
+
Guest guest
Quote
Dear Narasimha Kavaca Prabhu,

PAMHO. AGTSP.
Guests
I completely agree to what ever you have said now and earlier also. Same
with Gaura Kesava Prabhu. I said so even in my earlier mail. I am aware of
all those rules and quotes you are giving here.
To get across my point let me ask you a question.
In an ISKCON temple (not the home deities) where deities are installed,
say
the brahmanas who regularly perform worship are not available for what
ever
reasons (may be they suddenly lost faith, fell down and left the movement,
Krishna forbid). Who ever left behind is say only first initiation
devotees or some 16 rounders with out even first initiation. Until you send
another brahmana there, or until we get the existing devoteees their
second
initiation, say it may take a week's time. At that time *in the interim
period* for that week, do we allow the first initiated devotees or 16
rounders, to perform the seva (if they are willing to) or do we shut down
the altar until some qualified brahmanas come there?
Do we not "choose the best among the available lot" in a particular
situation, with out stopping seva?
Page 22 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
This is true even when there are many qualified brahmanas for the service.
For eg in the recent Sri Panca Tattva deity installation, at Mayapur out of
hundreds of brahmanas who attended the ceremony, only a handful, that
is the
"best among the available lot" were allowed for the service. And it has to
be like that. I was there also with my 10 cent thread. I would not dare
claim my entry on to the altar, when all the more qualified brahmanas are
around. However if in some situation when more qualified brahmanas are
not
there, I definitely do oer my seva, even though I think I am not
qualified. Recently I did 2 samskaras for devotee children (namakarana,
anna prasanna) when the likes of Gaura Kesava and Narasimha Kavaca
Prabhus
are not nearby. If more qualified brahmanas were there I woulld not do the
samskaras, as I think I am not fit to do all these samskaras. I would ask
the parents to look for more qualified brahmanas. However the devotees
said, they wanted only ISKCON priest do it for them so I did perform the
samskaras.
Hope by the mercy of Vaisnavas, one day I too can become qualified for
any
kind of seva for the devotees and the Supreme Lord.
Hope this keeps you in the best of health and Krishna Consciousness,
Hare Krishna,
"Nrsimha Kavaca (das) IDS" <Nrsimha.Kavaca.IDS (AT) pamho (DOT) net>
"Bhadra Govinda Dasa" <raganuga (AT) cyberway (DOT) com.sg>;
"Gregory Jay"
<gregjay (AT) softhome (DOT) net>
Cc: "Tattvavit (das) ACBSP (BBT)" <Tattvavit.ACBSP (AT) pamho (DOT)
net>; "India
(Continental Committee) Open (Forum)" <India.Open (AT) pamho (DOT)
net>
Tuesday, June 15, 2004 2:06 PM
> Dear Bhadra Govinda prabhu,
Page 23 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
>
> Please accept my humble obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada.
>
> Thank you for your letter.
>
> > Ideally she / he should be brahmana. Ideally if a brahmana (he/she) is
> > available she should do arcana. I am not telling that we may condone
this
> > requirement and allow sudras on to the altar when qualified
brahmanas
are
> > around. What I am saying is *If* brahmana is not available then some
one
> > else may be allowed to perform the seva, but seva may not be
stopped.
>
> I would like to stress here that this understanding is not correct.
Ideally
> is not an option. The sevait for the deity in an ISKCON temple must be a
> brahmana, no matter which deities are being worshiped. Srila
Prabhupada
was
> adamant on this point. It is with such rationale that standards slip in
> ISKCON.
>
> As far as home worship is concerned please read the following quote
from
> Srila Prabhupada.
>
> It is not necessary to be a Brahmin to have home altar,
>
> Letter to: Mangalamaya, Madhupuri - Calcutta 20 February, 1972
>
> > All I said is "we have to choose the best among the available lot".
This
> > is true in any situation.
>
> I cannot agree with this. It is not your right to choose in this
situation.
> The process of worship has been given by Krsna Himself. dharman to
saksat
> bhagavat pranitam. Deity worship is a process of religion and only
bhagavan
> can give religion. It is not up to us to change it at our whim.
Page 24 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
>
> > Srila Prabhupada neither wanted us to become sahajiyas with out
following
> > any rules and regulations nor he wanted us to become *caste*
brahmanas.
> > Niyamagraha!!
>
> He wanted us to worship the deity according to rules and regulations of
> deity worship, otherwise it would become idolatry. One of the first rules
of
> temple worship is that it is done by brahmanas. If we do not follow this
> then we have certainly slipped into niyamagraha, rejecting the rules and
> regulations of the scriptures (deity worship) and working independently
or
> whimsically.
>
> > In ISKCON 99% are home dieties. I just wanted to make sure these
99%
> > population are not neglected when we are discussing. By the way
Srila
> > Prabhupada wanted every home to be a temple.
>
> This may be. Home worship is a completely dierent proposition from
temple
> worship. If the assertion you are making is in relation to home worship
then
> I agree, however it is not correct for the deity in the temple to be
> worshiped by non-brahmanas.
>
> I hope this is clear to you prabhu.
>
>
> Your servant,
> Nrsimha Kavaca dasa
>
> Please visit our website: http://www.deityworship.com
+
Guest guest
Quote
To Whom it may concern especially, Bhadra Govinda das aka

raganuga (AT) cyberway (DOT) com.sg,
Page 25 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
PAMHO AGTSP
Before I respond again to these ideas, I would like to make plain my
Guests
opinion with regards to statements in the sastra about these sort of

things. Many times it is mentioned in the sastra that it is an oense
to do a certain thing, and some sort of punishment is given. One should
note that the punishment is always temporary. Vaisnavas (except perhaps
Madhvas) do not believe in eternal punishment. Then again many times it
is mentioned that one derives spiritual benefit from performing certain
acts, (even though one may not be qualified to do them?). Please note
that spiritual benefits are eternal. Therefore under certain
circumstances one could say that since the benefits are eternal and the
punishment is temporary that one would be justified in performing the
act even though one is not fit sastrically to do so. However this is
not usually the system. A good example of this is touching the deity or
salagrama. According to the sastra non-Vaisnavas are forbidden to touch
the deity or salagama. The punishment given in Hari Bhakti Vilasa is
going to hell as long as the sun and moon shine (temporary but a long
time). However Hari Bhakti Vilasa also mentions the eternal benefits
for those who do touch the deity or salagrama. The question is should
non-Vaisnavas do this? Since it is not recommended by the sastra the
answer is NO. If a situation occurs where this happens then the persons
who authorize, encourage, or actually participate in this oense are
all responsible. Only the actual person who touches the deity or
salagrama will derive the benefit as well as the punishment. Those in
positions of authority who encourage anti-sastric behavior will have to
share in the punishment. Guru na sah syat, etc.
On Jun 19, 2004, at 6:09 AM, Bhadra Govinda Dasa aka
raganuga (AT) cyberway (DOT) com.sg wrote:
> In an ISKCON temple (not the home deities) where deities are
> installed, say
> the brahmanas who regularly perform worship are not available for what
> ever
> reasons (may be they suddenly lost faith, fell down and left the
> movement,
> Krishna forbid). Who ever left behind is say only first initiation
> devotees or some 16 rounders with out even first initiation. Until
> you send
> another brahmana there, or until we get the existing devoteees their
> second
> initiation, say it may take a week's time. At that time *in the
Page 26 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> interim
> period* for that week, do we allow the first initiated devotees or 16
> rounders, to perform the seva (if they are willing to) or do we shut
> down
> the altar until some qualified brahmanas come there?
>
> Do we not "choose the best among the available lot" in a particular
> situation, with out stopping seva?
To your knowledge has such a situation ever occurred? You keep writing
as though this is a real situation. Probably this will never occur.
Srila Prabhupada mentions in the Bhagavatam that there should be at
least 3 or 4 brahmanas when deities (I believe he mentions Radha Krsna)
are installed. So I cannot think of when there was a situation where 3
or 4 pujaris (who were the ONLY brahmanas in the temple) left exactly
at the same time. One should admit that this would be an exceptionally
strange circumstance. The only situation I can think of like this is
when an ISKCON guru bloops and his disciples all go with him.
Particularly I was thinking of 1982 when Jayatirtha left. Even in that
circumstance, there were still Prabhupada disciples around. Recently
when Harikesha left from Europe there may have been some situation
"like" this. But even then there are certainly some qualified persons
available for doing the puja. Whether they refuse to do it or not is
another question.
> This is true even when there are many qualified brahmanas for the
> service.
> For eg in the recent Sri Panca Tattva deity installation, at Mayapur
> out of
> hundreds of brahmanas who attended the ceremony, only a handful,
that
> is the
> "best among the available lot" were allowed for the service.
Sorry I don't understand this point. This is a negative proof. It does
not prove anything about the previous statement.
> And it has to
> be like that. I was there also with my 10 cent thread. I would not
> dare
> claim my entry on to the altar, when all the more qualified brahmanas
> are
> around. However if in some situation when more qualified brahmanas
> are not
Page 27 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> there, I definitely do oer my seva, even though I think I am not

> qualified.
Certainly in complex rituals like installation one may not be trained
as others have been. That however does not disqualify one from helping
in some way. Not everyone involved in an installation ceremony will
need to perform complex rituals. Sometimes it is enough to help by
ringing a bell or waving a camara or reading from sastra. But still the
basic qualification for all those services in the temple is 2nd
initiation.
The problem is that we do many dierent types of puja as you say. And
we see the qualifications for them as being dierent. However the
sastra does not support this.
Technically one must be a Vaisnava to perform Vaisnava worship. One is
not technically a Vaisnava unless and until one has taken diksha
(Vaisnava Pancaratric diksha). Vaisnava worship is performed with
Pancaratric mantras. One who does not have those mantras will naturally
not be able to perform such worship. One gets those mantras (and
thereby the ability to use them in worship) at the time of Vaisnava
Pancaratric diksha. Actually the giving and receiving of those mantras
IS the essence of Vaisnava Pancaratric diksha. Sampradaya vihinam ye
mantras te nisphlala matah. The chanting of those mantras which are not
received through a bona fide apostolic succession (sampradaya) bear NO
fruit or result (nisphala).
"One should not fail to strictly follow the rules and regulations in
worshiping the Deity." NOD chpt 8
"Other rules are that one should not oer foodstu which is cooked by
a non-Vaisnava." NOD chpt 8
"One should not worship the Deity before a nondevotee." NOD chpt 8
(This seems not to be the oering of arati but the worship ceremonies
that are performed behind the curtains, privately by the pujaris)
"Touching the Deity
In the Visnu-dharmottara there is a statement about touching the lotus
feet of the Lord. It is said: "Only a person who is initiated as a
Vaisnava and is executing devotional service in Krsna consciousness has
the right to touch the body of the Deity." In India there was agitation
during Gandhi's political movement because the lowborn classes of men
Page 28 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
like street-sweepers and candalas are prohibited, according to Vedic

system, from entering the temple. Due to their unclean habits they are
prohibited, but at the same time they are given other facilities so
that they may be elevated to the highest grade of devotional service by
association with pure devotees. A man born in any family is not barred,
but he must be cleansed. That cleansing process must be adopted.
Gandhi
wanted to make them clean simply by stamping them with a ficticious
name, hari-jana (children of God), and so there was a great tug of war
between the temple owners and Gandhi's followers.
But anyway, the present law is the law of all scripture - that if
anyone is purified he can enter the temple. Actually, that is the
position. Only one who is properly initiated, who is properly following
the rules and regulations, can enter and touch the Deity - not all."
NOD chpt 9
Please also note that in the 11 canto of Srimad Bhagavatam Chapter 27
"Lord Krsna's Instructions on the process of Deity Worship" the very
first qualification mentioned for the worshiper is "dvijatvam" (twice
born status). See 11.27.8 as follows "Now please listen faithfully as I
explain exactly how a person who has achieved twice-born status through
the relevant Vedic prescriptions should worship Me with devotion." The
next verse 11.27.9 also mentions this as a prerequisite. And the next
two verses 11.27.10 mention that the worshiper should chant Vedic
mantras and Gayatri at the 3 sandhya times.
> Recently I did 2 samskaras for devotee children (namakarana,
> anna prasanna) when the likes of Gaura Kesava and Narasimha Kavaca
> Prabhus
> are not nearby. If more qualified brahmanas were there I woulld not
> do the
> samskaras, as I think I am not fit to do all these samskaras. I would
> ask
> the parents to look for more qualified brahmanas. However the devotees
> said, they wanted only ISKCON priest do it for them so I did perform
> the
> samskaras.
That's very nice but I also don't see the relevance of this paragraph.
This has nothing to do with the above main point.
So let me ask you a question. Would these devotees want an uninitiated
person to do these samskaras?
Page 29 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
There are several points being tossed around in this email. But let us
stick to the main one. You are proposing a scenario and suggesting a
solution which is unsastric. However I can suggest a sastric solution
to your extremely unlikely scenario. If indeed the only person left in
an ISKCON Temple is a first initiated or un-initiated devotee and the
deities are in need of a pujari, the solution is simple. That devotee
needs to call his or her GBC member who is responsible for the puja and
arrange for someone present on the spot to be initiated with the
Pancaratric mantras so that the deity worship can go on without oense
or break.
Srila Prabhupada showed us many times like in the case you quoted in
Sydney, Australia where he initiated persons to do the puja. This
initiation does not require that the Diksha Guru be physically present.
We have seen that Srila Prabhupada delivered these mantras to some of
his disciples by tape recording. Similarly we have telephone, tape, cd,
video, computer, email, fax, etc, etc, these days. All these things
although not traditional are not against the sastra. Therefore the
Diksha Guru can initiate a person immediately (by long distance if
necessary) to fill the void left in your hypothetical scenario
I anticipate that some persons will object to this saying that perhaps
the person who is to be given diksha is not qualified to receive it.
The answer is IF HE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO GET THE DIKSHA HOW IS HE
QUALIFIED TO TOUCH THE DEITY AND DO THE PUJA?
So you see there is actually ABSOLUTELY NO excuse for saying that there
are no brahmanas (2nd initiates, whatever) to do the puja in ISKCON
Temples. If there are none then make some. Srila Prabhupada in fact did
this. Stop trying to say that on one hand someone is qualified to do
puja but is unqualified to receive diksha.
ys
GKD
+
Guest guest
Quote
Dear Prabhu,
Page 30 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
PAMHO. AGTSP.
This time also I agree to everything you say.
Guests
However still it is not clear to me "In the situation I referred, in the

interim period, until we get the diksa by telephone, especially for the
ISKCON installed dieties what does guru, sadhu and sastra recommend?"
I will be grateful for any information in this regard.
"May there be good fortune throughout the universe, and may all envious
persons be pacified. May all living entities become calm by practicing
bhakti-yoga, for by accepting devotional service they will think of each
other's welfare. Therefore let us all engage in the service of the supreme
transcendence, Lord Sri Krishna, and always remain absorbed in thought
of
Him."
(Srimad Bhagavatam 5:18:9.)
The above sloka is nothing related to the topic of discussion, but I have
this practice of reminding myself of some sloka from Bg or SB when I am
not
happy, to lift my self up.
Hare Krishna,
Let's chant and be happy!!!
net>; "Tattvavit
(Continental
Tuesday, June 22, 2004 1:25 PM
> To Whom it may concern especially, Bhadra Govinda das aka
Page 31 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> raganuga (AT) cyberway (DOT) com.sg,

>
> PAMHO AGTSP
>
> Before I respond again to these ideas, I would like to make plain my
> opinion with regards to statements in the sastra about these sort of
> things. Many times it is mentioned in the sastra that it is an oense
> to do a certain thing, and some sort of punishment is given. One should
> note that the punishment is always temporary. Vaisnavas (except
perhaps
> Madhvas) do not believe in eternal punishment. Then again many times
it
> is mentioned that one derives spiritual benefit from performing certain
> acts, (even though one may not be qualified to do them?). Please note
> that spiritual benefits are eternal. Therefore under certain
> circumstances one could say that since the benefits are eternal and the
> punishment is temporary that one would be justified in performing the
> act even though one is not fit sastrically to do so. However this is
> not usually the system. A good example of this is touching the deity or
> salagrama. According to the sastra non-Vaisnavas are forbidden to
touch
> the deity or salagama. The punishment given in Hari Bhakti Vilasa is
> going to hell as long as the sun and moon shine (temporary but a long
> time). However Hari Bhakti Vilasa also mentions the eternal benefits
> for those who do touch the deity or salagrama. The question is should
> non-Vaisnavas do this? Since it is not recommended by the sastra the
> answer is NO. If a situation occurs where this happens then the persons
> who authorize, encourage, or actually participate in this oense are
> all responsible. Only the actual person who touches the deity or
> salagrama will derive the benefit as well as the punishment. Those in
> positions of authority who encourage anti-sastric behavior will have to
> share in the punishment. Guru na sah syat, etc.
>
> On Jun 19, 2004, at 6:09 AM, Bhadra Govinda Dasa aka
> raganuga (AT) cyberway (DOT) com.sg wrote:
>
> > In an ISKCON temple (not the home deities) where deities are
> > installed, say
> > the brahmanas who regularly perform worship are not available for
what
> > ever
> > reasons (may be they suddenly lost faith, fell down and left the
> > movement,
> > Krishna forbid). Who ever left behind is say only first initiation
Page 32 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> > devotees or some 16 rounders with out even first initiation. Until
> > you send
> > another brahmana there, or until we get the existing devoteees their
> > second
> > initiation, say it may take a week's time. At that time *in the
> > interim
> > period* for that week, do we allow the first initiated devotees or 16
> > rounders, to perform the seva (if they are willing to) or do we shut
> > down
> > the altar until some qualified brahmanas come there?
>>
> > Do we not "choose the best among the available lot" in a particular
> > situation, with out stopping seva?
>
> To your knowledge has such a situation ever occurred? You keep writing
> as though this is a real situation. Probably this will never occur.
> Srila Prabhupada mentions in the Bhagavatam that there should be at
> least 3 or 4 brahmanas when deities (I believe he mentions Radha
Krsna)
> are installed. So I cannot think of when there was a situation where 3
> or 4 pujaris (who were the ONLY brahmanas in the temple) left exactly
> at the same time. One should admit that this would be an exceptionally
> strange circumstance. The only situation I can think of like this is
> when an ISKCON guru bloops and his disciples all go with him.
> Particularly I was thinking of 1982 when Jayatirtha left. Even in that
> circumstance, there were still Prabhupada disciples around. Recently
> when Harikesha left from Europe there may have been some situation
> "like" this. But even then there are certainly some qualified persons
> available for doing the puja. Whether they refuse to do it or not is
> another question.
>
> > This is true even when there are many qualified brahmanas for the
> > service.
> > For eg in the recent Sri Panca Tattva deity installation, at Mayapur
> > out of
> > hundreds of brahmanas who attended the ceremony, only a handful,
that
> > is the
> > "best among the available lot" were allowed for the service.
>
> Sorry I don't understand this point. This is a negative proof. It does
> not prove anything about the previous statement.
>
> > And it has to
Page 33 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> > be like that. I was there also with my 10 cent thread. I would not
> > dare
> > claim my entry on to the altar, when all the more qualified brahmanas
> > are
> > around. However if in some situation when more qualified brahmanas
> > are not
> > there, I definitely do oer my seva, even though I think I am not
> > qualified.
>
> Certainly in complex rituals like installation one may not be trained
> as others have been. That however does not disqualify one from helping
> in some way. Not everyone involved in an installation ceremony will
> need to perform complex rituals. Sometimes it is enough to help by
> ringing a bell or waving a camara or reading from sastra. But still the
> basic qualification for all those services in the temple is 2nd
> initiation.
>
> The problem is that we do many dierent types of puja as you say. And
> we see the qualifications for them as being dierent. However the
> sastra does not support this.
>
> Technically one must be a Vaisnava to perform Vaisnava worship. One is
> not technically a Vaisnava unless and until one has taken diksha
> (Vaisnava Pancaratric diksha). Vaisnava worship is performed with
> Pancaratric mantras. One who does not have those mantras will
naturally
> not be able to perform such worship. One gets those mantras (and
> thereby the ability to use them in worship) at the time of Vaisnava
> Pancaratric diksha. Actually the giving and receiving of those mantras
> IS the essence of Vaisnava Pancaratric diksha. Sampradaya vihinam ye
> mantras te nisphlala matah. The chanting of those mantras which are
not
> received through a bona fide apostolic succession (sampradaya) bear
NO
> fruit or result (nisphala).
>
> "One should not fail to strictly follow the rules and regulations in
> worshiping the Deity." NOD chpt 8
>
> "Other rules are that one should not oer foodstu which is cooked by
> a non-Vaisnava." NOD chpt 8
>
> "One should not worship the Deity before a nondevotee." NOD chpt 8
> (This seems not to be the oering of arati but the worship ceremonies
Page 34 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> that are performed behind the curtains, privately by the pujaris)
>
> "Touching the Deity
>
> In the Visnu-dharmottara there is a statement about touching the lotus
> feet of the Lord. It is said: "Only a person who is initiated as a
> Vaisnava and is executing devotional service in Krsna consciousness
has
> the right to touch the body of the Deity." In India there was agitation
> during Gandhi's political movement because the lowborn classes of
men
> like street-sweepers and candalas are prohibited, according to Vedic
> system, from entering the temple. Due to their unclean habits they are
> prohibited, but at the same time they are given other facilities so
> that they may be elevated to the highest grade of devotional service by
> association with pure devotees. A man born in any family is not barred,
> but he must be cleansed. That cleansing process must be adopted.
Gandhi
> wanted to make them clean simply by stamping them with a ficticious
> name, hari-jana (children of God), and so there was a great tug of war
> between the temple owners and Gandhi's followers.
>
> But anyway, the present law is the law of all scripture - that if
> anyone is purified he can enter the temple. Actually, that is the
> position. Only one who is properly initiated, who is properly following
> the rules and regulations, can enter and touch the Deity - not all."
> NOD chpt 9
>
> Please also note that in the 11 canto of Srimad Bhagavatam Chapter 27
> "Lord Krsna's Instructions on the process of Deity Worship" the very
> first qualification mentioned for the worshiper is "dvijatvam" (twice
> born status). See 11.27.8 as follows "Now please listen faithfully as I
> explain exactly how a person who has achieved twice-born status
through
> the relevant Vedic prescriptions should worship Me with devotion." The
> next verse 11.27.9 also mentions this as a prerequisite. And the next
> two verses 11.27.10 mention that the worshiper should chant Vedic
> mantras and Gayatri at the 3 sandhya times.
>
> > Recently I did 2 samskaras for devotee children (namakarana,
> > anna prasanna) when the likes of Gaura Kesava and Narasimha
Kavaca
> > Prabhus
> > are not nearby. If more qualified brahmanas were there I woulld not
Page 35 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> > do the

> > samskaras, as I think I am not fit to do all these samskaras. I would
> > ask
> > the parents to look for more qualified brahmanas. However the
devotees
> > said, they wanted only ISKCON priest do it for them so I did perform
> > the
> > samskaras.
>
> That's very nice but I also don't see the relevance of this paragraph.
> This has nothing to do with the above main point.
>
> So let me ask you a question. Would these devotees want an uninitiated
> person to do these samskaras?
>
> There are several points being tossed around in this email. But let us
> stick to the main one. You are proposing a scenario and suggesting a
> solution which is unsastric. However I can suggest a sastric solution
> to your extremely unlikely scenario. If indeed the only person left in
> an ISKCON Temple is a first initiated or un-initiated devotee and the
> deities are in need of a pujari, the solution is simple. That devotee
> needs to call his or her GBC member who is responsible for the puja
and
> arrange for someone present on the spot to be initiated with the
> Pancaratric mantras so that the deity worship can go on without oense
> or break.
>
> Srila Prabhupada showed us many times like in the case you quoted in
> Sydney, Australia where he initiated persons to do the puja. This
> initiation does not require that the Diksha Guru be physically present.
> We have seen that Srila Prabhupada delivered these mantras to some of
> his disciples by tape recording. Similarly we have telephone, tape, cd,
> video, computer, email, fax, etc, etc, these days. All these things
> although not traditional are not against the sastra. Therefore the
> Diksha Guru can initiate a person immediately (by long distance if
> necessary) to fill the void left in your hypothetical scenario
>
> I anticipate that some persons will object to this saying that perhaps
> the person who is to be given diksha is not qualified to receive it.
> The answer is IF HE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO GET THE DIKSHA HOW IS
HE
> QUALIFIED TO TOUCH THE DEITY AND DO THE PUJA?
>
> So you see there is actually ABSOLUTELY NO excuse for saying that
Page 36 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
there
> are no brahmanas (2nd initiates, whatever) to do the puja in ISKCON
> Temples. If there are none then make some. Srila Prabhupada in fact did
> this. Stop trying to say that on one hand someone is qualified to do
> puja but is unqualified to receive diksha.
>
> ys
>
> GKD
>
+
Guest guest
Quote
10 Jun 04
Gaura Kesava Prabhu wrote:
Guests
> I have told you that

> there are NO ISKCON Temples without initiated devotees.
And he wrote earlier:
> there are many instances in ISKCON where first or non
> initiated devotees actually do perform deity worship even though this
does
> not seem to conform to Srila Prabhupada's instructions.
This has become accepted in ISKCON although it is clearly a compromise
of
standards given by Srila Prabhupada.---reply by HH Bhakti Vikasa Swami
Maharaja on 16 May .
And I Bhadra Govinda Dasa, was trying to say case to case it may be
dierent. For example consider the following cases.
1. There may be ISKCON Home temples with initiated devotees where
some times
some standards may be relaxed by the house members, for genuine
reasons
during bad health, outstation etc,.
Page 37 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
2. There may be ISKCON main temples where there may be some

practical
problems, where there may be shortage of man power, at certain times for
some unforseen circumstances where standards may be relaxed.
The above two may be genuine cases. and case 3
3. There may be standards relaxed *due to negligence* of the home
members
and of the temple inmates, and not due to some genuine problem.
So we have to be compassionate to the needs of the situation in case 1
and 2
above. And case 3 above is serious and needs to be condemned, which I
too
agree with Gaura Kesava Prabhu and Narasimha Kavaca Prabhu for
condemning
case 3.
I thank all the devotees for their wonderful inputs on deity worship.
Let's chant and be happy.
Hare Krishna,
+
Guest guest
Quote

Guests
> However still it is not clear to me "In the situation I referred, in

> the
> interim period, until we get the diksa by telephone, especially for
> the
> ISKCON installed dieties what does guru, sadhu and sastra
recommend?"
>
Page 38 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> I will be grateful for any information in this regard.

Let's be clear on this. Gurus and sadhus always recommend the sastric
way. There is no dierence. Here is a quote from Caitanya Caritamrta
concerning the items that can be performed even by non-initiates.
The method of worshiping the deity is described in CC Mad 24.334
purport as follows:
In the Hari-Bhakti-vilasa (Eleventh Vilasa, verses 127-140) there is a
vivid description of what is required in Deity worship. There are
sixty-four items mentioned. In the temple, worship should be so
gorgeous that all sixty four items should be available for the
satisfaction of the Personality of Godhead. Sometimes it is impossible
to get all sixty-four items; therefore we recommend that at least on
the first day of installation all sixty-four items should be available.
When the Lord is established, worship with all sixty-four items should
continue as far as possible.
(So these items should continue as far as possible. Since it is not
possible for a person without pancaratric diksha to perform pancaratric
worship, without committing oense, by going against Srila
Prabhupada's instructions and the dictates of the sastra, I will
outline those activities of the 64 which can continue until someone
qualified by pancaratric diksha is available to perform the rest.)
The sixty-four items are as follows:
1) There must be a big bell hanging in front of the temple room for
anyone to ring who comes. This item is called prabhodana, or oering
the Lord one's submission.
2) The devotee or visitor must chant the Deities' names such as "Jaya
Sri Radha-Govinda" or "Jaya Sri Radha Madhava" as he rings the bell.
This word "Jaya" must be uttered.
3) Immediately oer obeisances to the Lord by falling down like a
stick.
5) There must be an asana, a sitting place before the altar. This asana
is for the spiritual master. The disciple brings everything before the
spiritual master, and the spiritual master oers everything to the
Supreme Personality of Godhead.
(So if people consider themselves disciples even though they are not
formally initiated then they can bring things and place them at the
asana for the spiritual master to oer. But since in your scenario the
spiritual master is not present to make the oering this might not be
very eective. Please also note that formally initiated disciples also
Page 39 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
take permission from the spiritual master before oering items to the
Lord.)
31) Precautions should always be taken to protect the body of the Lord
from demons and atheists.
50) The Hare Krsna mantra and other approved songs should be regularly
chanted.
51) Musical instruments should be played.
52) One should dance before the Deity.
53) One should circumnambulate the Deity.
54) One should oer obeisances to the Deity.
55) One should oer dierent types of prayers and hymns at the lotus
feet of the Deity.
57) One should touch to one's head the flowers oered to the Lord on
the previous day.
58) One should regularly take prasadam, the remnants of food oered to
the Lord.
The last two items assume that there are some oered flowers and
prasadam that was cooked and oered previously by the pujari before
he/she left. Otherwise it would not be possible to oer any flowers or
bhoga and subsequently honor them.
I would say that the most important item would be item #50. That the
persons who are present should chant "Hare Krsna", thus continuing the
worship of the deity through the agency of Harinama Sankirtana (for
which all are eligible without distinction) and make arrangements for
themselves to become qualified or for a qualified person to come and
again start oering the rest of the items.
So the answer to your question is that there are at least 10 (or 11 if
your include #5 or 13 if you include #57-58) items of the 64 that may
be done in the absence of devotees with pancaratric diksha.
ys
Gaura Keshava dasa
+
Guest guest
Quote
Page 40 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM

Guests
> In an ISKCON temple (not the home deities) where deities are installed,
> say the brahmanas who regularly perform worship are not available for
what
> ever reasons (may be they suddenly lost faith, fell down and left the
> movement, Krishna forbid). Who ever left behind is say only first
> initiation devotees or some 16 rounders with out even first initiation.
> Until you send another brahmana there, or until we get the existing
> devoteees their second initiation, say it may take a week's time. At that
> time *in the interim period* for that week, do we allow the first
> initiated devotees or 16 rounders, to perform the seva (if they are
> willing to) or do we shut down the altar until some qualified brahmanas
> come there?
If we study and follow the instructions given by Srila Prabhupada about
the
installing and worshiping of deities you will understand that this
hypothetical situation you talk about just will not happen.
Some quotes from Srila Prabhupada to substantiate my point:
As far as your desire to have Sita Rama Deities, it is a good idea, but you
should wait for some time. First see that you have sucient brahmanas
who
are very well trained and qualified, then you can consider to install Sita,
Rama, Laksmana, and Hanuman.
>>> Ref. VedaBase => Letter to: Brisakapi -- Nellore 7 January, 1976
No you should not install Gaura nitai deities if you do not have the
required Brahmins. Better wait.
>>> Ref. VedaBase => Letter to: Hrdayananda -- Vrindaban 7 December,
1975
Srila Prabhupada again and again instructed the leaders of the society to
only install deities if there were sucient brahmanasa available so that
the worship would go on even if someone unfortunately left.
He generally suggested there should be between 8 and 15 brahmanas
Page 41 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
before the
devotees could consider installing deities.
> Do we not "choose the best among the available lot" in a particular
> situation, with out stopping seva?
Then what do we do when we cannot find a first initiate to worship the
deities? Or what if we cannot find someone who is chanting sixteen
rounds?
Eventually with the kind of rationale you are promoting we will employ
unqualified people to worship the deity. Sorry your ideas are just
unacceptable. As soon as the qualification to do the seva is lost it is no
longer seva, but idolatry.
What we do choose to do is follow the instructions of the acaryas, not
arbitrarily or whimsically make our own process of devotional service. If
we
are not following the system given by the acaryas there is little chance
that Krsna will accept our oerings.
Another quote from Srila Prabhupada:
Our Deity worship is not heathenism. If we keep Forms of the Lord without
worshipping the Deity under regulative principles, it will gradually turn
into idol worship, which is an oense.
>>> Ref. VedaBase => Letter to: Syamasundara -- Los Angeles 15 July,
1969
> This is true even when there are many qualified brahmanas for the
service.
> For eg in the recent Sri Panca Tattva deity installation, at Mayapur out
> of hundreds of brahmanas who attended the ceremony, only a handful,
that
> is the "best among the available lot" were allowed for the service. And
> it has to be like that. I was there also with my 10 cent thread. I
This is an opinion and not what actually happened. I was closely involved
in
the planning and execution of the installation and was given the service of
organizing the abhiseka and can tell you for certain that this was not the
consideration. The selection of who would do the abhiseka was made by
the
GBC and they asked that only the Mayapur pujaris do the abhiseka in
Page 42 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
order
that it may logistically go smoothly and to avoid possible political issues
about whether or not matajis or gurukulis etc. could be involved. There
was
more than 7,000 devotees in Mayapur for the installation and it was not
physically possible for all of them to participate directly in the bathing
in the alloted time.
> would not dare claim my entry on to the altar, when all the more
Neither would I, but to my great surprise, I was asked to do it by my
worshipable superiors.
There were many highly qualified brahmanas and sannyasis present who
did not
get the opportunity to bathe the Panca-tattva. I can only put it down to the
mercy of Mahaprabhu.
Look forward to hearing from you soon.
Your servant,
Nrsimha Kavaca dasa
+
Guest guest
Quote

Guests
> 10 Jun 04
>
> Gaura Kesava Prabhu wrote:
>
>> I have told you that
>> there are NO ISKCON Temples without initiated devotees.
Right, and you have failed to provide the name of any ISKCON temple
with installed deities that is run completely by non-initiates. Please
Page 43 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
stop belaboring this point.

> And he wrote earlier:
>
>> there are many instances in ISKCON where first or non
>> initiated devotees actually do perform deity worship even though this
>> does
>> not seem to conform to Srila Prabhupada's instructions.
What is the point in quoting this? If it is against sastra and Srila
Prabhupada's instructions then no amount of people doing it makes it
right.
> This has become accepted in ISKCON although it is clearly a
compromise
> of
> standards given by Srila Prabhupada.---reply by HH Bhakti Vikasa
Swami
> Maharaja on 16 May .
Again just because it is "accepted" practice does not prove that it is
right and should continue.
> And I Bhadra Govinda Dasa, was trying to say case to case it may be
> dierent.
What you keep saying is that sometimes we should disobey Srila
Prabhupada and sastra according to your opinion.
> For example consider the following cases.
>
> 1. There may be ISKCON Home temples with initiated devotees where
some
> times
> some standards may be relaxed by the house members, for genuine
reasons
> during bad health, outstation etc,.
Please stop referring to ISKCON Home temples. There is no such thing.
We already discussed the home puja situation.
> 2. There may be ISKCON main temples where there may be some
practical
> problems, where there may be shortage of man power, at certain times
Page 44 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> for
> some unforseen circumstances where standards may be relaxed.
I have shown Srila Prabhupada's instructions that the standard should
continue as far as possible. I have also proven with numerous quotes
that his standard was 2nd initiates to do the arcana. I have also shown
how others who are unqualified can become qualified instantly by
getting diksha. And further more I have also shown how those without
qualification can continue the worship of the Lord by Harinam
Sanskirtana until a qualified 2nd initiate is available. My solutions
are all sastric and according to Srila Prabhupada's example and
instructions.
On the other hand. You have suggested the "accepted" solution which is
unsastric and against Srila Prabhupada's instructions. All along the
way you say that you agree with me. Please stop wasting my time. If you
are unable to give a sastric quote or reason for your opinion please be
silent.
> The above two may be genuine cases. and case 3
>
> 3. There may be standards relaxed *due to negligence* of the home
> members
> and of the temple inmates, and not due to some genuine problem.
>
> So we have to be compassionate to the needs of the situation in case 1
> and 2
> above.
Real compassion is NOT misleading others as to the instructions of the
sastra and the guru. Compassion means helping people who are ignorant
of the sastric situation to understand it and follow it. Compassion
does not mean leading people astray.
> And case 3 above is serious and needs to be condemned, which I too
> agree with Gaura Kesava Prabhu and Narasimha Kavaca Prabhu for
> condemning
> case 3.
Again you are reading my email but still not understanding it. It is
not us that condemn arcana by non-initiates, it is Srila Prabhupada and
the sastra.
ys
Page 45 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
Gaura Keshava dasa

+
Guest guest
Quote
Posted 4 Jul 2004 Report post

Guests

> I am aware and understand fully well, what ever rules and regulations
you
> and Gaura Kesava Prabhu are quoting. No where I have said, that we
must
> condone these rules and regulations, for general circumstances. I am
> really surprised that, you are simply assuming things which I never said,
> and putting words into my mouth.
I respond to what you write. Nothing more.
> It is obvious that when I say " We do choose the best among the
available
> lot" for what ever criteria it may be, that there is a basic minimum
Change the word "lot" to "brahmanas" then we are on the same
wavelength.
> In unforseen circumstances, in times of emergency, I am referring to:
>
> I am asking at what level we draw the line for unforseen circumstances?
> 2nd initiation? If so, so be it. First initiation, we draw the line? so
> be it. All that I am asking is in unforseen circumstances, like we allow
> a twice initiated woman during her monthly cycle (only Gaudiya acaryas
> allow this) perform seva, similarly do Gaudiya acaryas allow for some
> relaxation when no qualified brahmana is around?
If we follow the standards for installation given by Srila Prabhupada then
the type of questions you are asking here do not arise. Srila Prabhupada
generally insisted that 8-12 brahmanas were required to install deities. If
we focus on maintaining this many brahmanas to worship the deities then
Page 46 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
the
hypothetical situation you are discussing should not arise. However
because
we have not done this and allowed things to slip then we find these kinds
of
things are happening.
You talk about Gaudiya acarayas allowing women to worship the deity
during
their menstrual cycle, I would say one Gaudiya acarya, here is the quote:
According to the smarta vidhi, women cannot touch deity during
menstrual
period but the goswami viddhi allows. But it is better not to do it. One
thing is that the seva can never be stopped for any reason. This also for
the cooking.
Letter to: Amsu: -- Vrindaban 13 August, 1974
You may note that Srila Prabhupada said that it should not happen, but if
there was no one else to do it then a mataji who is contaminated should
do
it, however she should still be a brahmana. He did not opt for a suchi
non-brahmana in deference to a contaminated brahmana. This is one of
the
basic qualifications for the worship of temple deities.
This is a consideration of cleanlines, not qualification. There are certain
things that can be adjusted and there are certain things that cannot.
There are many dierent gradations of cleanliness. To worship the deity a
person must be clean, wearing clean cloth etc. If the highest standard is
not available then we opt for the next. If this is not available then the
next and so on. However all these persons who are being considered for
worshiping the deity must have the appropriate qualification of being a
brahmana. If they do not then they cannot be considered for worshiping
the
diety in the temple.
Would you allow a plumber to do your engineering work if you did not
have a
suitably qualified engineer to do the job?
> For every rule there is an exception. But we must understand that even
Page 47 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> for exception there is a rule. What is that rule for these exceptional
> cases according to Guru, Sadhu and Shastra?
I do not agree. Is this a sastric conclusion or simply a materialistic
opinion of those who do not like to follow rules. Sounds very much like the
phrase I used when I was a child a school. "Rules are made to be
broken."
The rules and principles of devotional service cannot be adjusted. I can
immediately think of four rules that every Vaisnava follows that there are
no exceptions for. There are many more, such as brahmanas only doing
the
worship in the temple. I could name many others but they are not relevant
here.
You might like to read further in the sixth chapter of the NoD, "How to
discharge devotional service. In the beginning of the chapter principles
and
details of devotional service are discussed then the list of principles are
given. The second item is "becoming initiated by the spiritual master and
learning how to discharge devotional service from him" The worship of the
deity is part of this and becoming initiated also means gayatri diksa. As it
is described in the introduction to the Pancaratra pradipa:
"The Pancaratra-sastra clearly defines the preliminary qualifications a
person must have to perform arcana. Family origins and social position
are
not considerations; all that is required is strong faith in Visnu, or Krsna.
By the authority of the Pancaratra scriptures, when the spiritual master
judges his disciple qualified with sincere faith, he gives the disciple
Vaisnava diksa, also known as panca-samskara, which consists of taking
a
Vaisnava name, wearing Vaisnava tilaka, wearing Vaisnava symbols,
receiving
Vaisnava mantras (secret mantras concerning Visnu or Krsna), and
learning
the method of worshiping the Deity. The disciple is then qualified to
perform arcana."
Initiation means receiving the pancaratrika mantras with which we worship
the deity and also learning the method of worship. Without receiving these
from the spiritual master how can a devotee honestly engage in the
worship
of the deity?
Page 48 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
> Thank you for your valuable time.

You are welcome prabhu.
> I pray for the mercy of that Supreme Lord Jagannatha, who allows even
> sabaras, the pig keepers to serve Him.--- Now, now don't assume that I
> am recommending we must in general allow all kinds of sabaras on to
our
> altars. This is simply a prayer and realisation, that how merciful and
> supremely independent is our Lord.
Even Lord Jagannatha does not allow them on the altar. They get to serve
the
Lord when He comes out of the temple. When Jagannatha comes o the
altar He
takes the mood of patita pavana. He is very merciful to the fallen.
You will see the same things happen at festivals in ISKCON. It has long
been
a tradition in our temples that all devotees get to bathe Jagannatha at
snana yatra, or push the swing during jhulana yatra, or pull the ropes for
ratha yatra. Nothing breaking or bending rules here.
Your servant,
Nrsimha Kavaca dasa
+
Guest guest
Quote
> I can immediately think of four rules that every Vaisnava

> follows that there are no exceptions for.
Even the great Vishvamitra was willing to eat the meat of a dog when
Guests
necessity arose, and Vaishnava acharya's have cited this example as

evidence
that this rule (of no meat eating) can be broken under extreme
circumstances. There are similar exemptions to most of the other
regulations
we follow. Certainly the claim that "every Vaishnava" follows these rules is
foolish. Just stick with ISKCON and say all ISKCON devotees are required
Page 49 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
to
follow these regulations. Even then there are exceptions cited by our
acharyas where these rules may be broken under extreme circumstances.
>You will see the same things happen at festivals in ISKCON.
>It has long been a tradition in our temples that all devotees
>get to bathe Jagannatha at snana yatra, or push the swing
>during jhulana yatra, or pull the ropes for ratha yatra.
>Nothing breaking or bending rules here.
It is nothing even remotely similar. The sabaras eat along with the Lord on
the same plate, in addition to countless other uncustomary practices.
There
is no comparison to festivals conducted in ISKCON temples where the
public
is involved in the worship and the worship practiced by the sabaras.
"Nothing breaking or bending the rules..."? Maybe you haven't studied the
customs of the sabara?
There is an obvious reason why Ramanuja wanted to change the system
of
worship in Puri to Pancharatra.
+
Guest guest
Quote
Dear Ram Laksmanji, PAMHO AGTSP

Thanks for your email. The two points included are well taken.
Guests
1. The basic for all rules and regulations is to always remember Krsna
and never forget Him (see Bhakti Rasamrta Sindhu). Therefore there can
be exceptional circumstances where on might have to "eat meat" for
example.
2. The customs and worship of Jagannatha in Puri is not according to
Vaisnava Pancaratric system. (Which I did point out in my emails to
Bhadra Govinda das, even if Nrsimha Kavacaji did not, for those of you
who were following the discussion)
Thank you.
Page 50 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
However neither of your points supports the claim by the originator of

this discussion (Bhadra Govinda das) that "non-initiates be allowed to
worship deities in ISKCON temples". Eating meat may be a necessity but
the worship of the deity in ISKCON can and should be carried on only by
properly initiated devotees according to the standard of HDG Srila
Prabhupada. If by some exceptional circumstances there is absolutely no
initiated devotee present, those who are present may chant the Hare
Krsna mahamantra and in this way please the Supreme Lord in His deity
form. I have pointed out all these things in previous emails.
Again thank you Ram Laksmanji for your special perspective on the
Sabharas. You certainly should know as I see your email address is
Bhuvanesvara.
Just as a note of interest there is one place where we can see the
worship of Jagannatha according to Pancaratric principles. The
Jagannatha Math in Sri Rangam where the deities are said to have been
carved by Mahaprabhu Himself while staying there during the caturmasya
of 1512 AD. If any one is interested in this I have photos and video of
that worship.
ys
Gaura Keshava das
On Jul 5, 2004, at 11:09 PM, Ram Lakshman (das) (Bhubaneshwar - IN)
wrote:
>> I can immediately think of four rules that every Vaisnava
>> follows that there are no exceptions for.
>
> Even the great Vishvamitra was willing to eat the meat of a dog when
> necessity arose, and Vaishnava acharya's have cited this example as
> evidence
> that this rule (of no meat eating) can be broken under extreme
> circumstances. There are similar exemptions to most of the other
> regulations
> we follow. Certainly the claim that "every Vaishnava" follows these
> rules is
> foolish. Just stick with ISKCON and say all ISKCON devotees are
> required to
> follow these regulations. Even then there are exceptions cited by our
> acharyas where these rules may be broken under extreme
Page 51 of 53
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
circumstances.
>
>> You will see the same things happen at festivals in ISKCON.
>> It has long been a tradition in our temples that all devotees
>> get to bathe Jagannatha at snana yatra, or push the swing
>> during jhulana yatra, or pull the ropes for ratha yatra.
>> Nothing breaking or bending rules here.
>
> It is nothing even remotely similar. The sabaras eat along with the
> Lord on
> the same plate, in addition to countless other uncustomary practices.
> There
> is no comparison to festivals conducted in ISKCON temples where the
> public
> is involved in the worship and the worship practiced by the sabaras.
>
> "Nothing breaking or bending the rules..."? Maybe you haven't studied
> the
> customs of the sabara?
>
> There is an obvious reason why Ramanuja wanted to change the system
of
> worship in Puri to Pancharatra.
>
+
Quote
Your content will need to be approved by a moderator
1 Reply to this topic...
GO TO TOPIC LISTING
The Hare Krishna Forum
+ +
$ Home IndiaDivine.org Forums on Hinduism The Hare Krishna Forum non-initiates performing arcana
All Activity
Page 52 of 53
Theme !
6/22/16, 6:01 PM
Contact Us
Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.
Page 53 of 53

Non-Initiates Performing Arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Non-Initiates Performing Arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.

Existing user? Sign In !

Submit New Articles on

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

& Sign in to follow this

Start new topic

Reply to this topic

17 posts in this topic

Posted 6 Jun 2004 Report post

Dear Bhadra Govinda prabhu,

Thank you for your letter.

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

Help Feed Needy Children in India

Food Distribution in Chinnapuram Village, Andhra

Posted 7 Jun 2004 Report post

Yes prabhu. Agreed.

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

Posted 7 Jun 2004 Report post

Dear Bhadra Govinda dasa, PAMHO AGTSP

>> Yes this is correct, but she should be a brahmana. It is not

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

> Ideally she / he should be brahmana. Ideally if a brahmana (he/she)

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

Posted 8 Jun 2004 Report post

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

> Dear Bhadra Govinda dasa, PAMHO AGTSP

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

> by NON-initiated devotees. And if such a situation occurs then either

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

Posted 10 Jun 2004 Report post

Dear Bhadra Govindaji, PAMHO AGTSP

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

system of congregational preaching with Srila Prabhupada's instructions

Posted 13 Jun 2004 Report post

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

> Dear Bhadra Govindaji, PAMHO AGTSP

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

> perform Vaisnava Pancaratric worship either in the home or temple.

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

Posted 15 Jun 2004 Report post

Dear Bhadra Govinda prabhu,

Thank you for your letter.

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

Posted 19 Jun 2004 Report post

Dear Narasimha Kavaca Prabhu,

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

> Dear Bhadra Govinda prabhu,

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

Posted 22 Jun 2004 Report post

To Whom it may concern especially, Bhadra Govinda das aka

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org

opinion with regards to statements in the sastra about these sort of

non-initiates performing arcana - The Hare Krishna Forum - IndiaDivine.org