Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Consumer
Decision Making
Process
Fact or Fiction?
Luke Meyer
LUKE MEYER
CONSUMER DECISION MAKING PROCESS
pg. 2
LUKE MEYER
CONSUMER DECISION MAKING PROCESS
the order and existence of these steps may depend on the personal and psychological
characteristics of the buyer (Kumra 2007, p. 277). Personal characteristics include demographic
factors (such as age, education and income), lifestyle and personality (Elliott, Rundle-Thiele &
Waller 2014, pp. 130-3). Each one of these factors influence the extent that the consumer
decision making process is used. Hypothetically, when discussing demographic factors, if a
customer of young age purchased a toy they may have gone through need/want recognition,
purchase and post-purchase evaluation (1st, 4th, and 5th stages) but may not have gone through
information search and evaluation of options (2nd and 3rd stages). For this customer,
information search and evaluation of options may not be relevant as they are over exited about
the product and are instantly convinced they need it. Therefore, they will not seek information
from known, trusted or even convenient sources and they will not compare it with other
alternatives or consider not purchasing it. Psychological characteristics of the buyer also affect
the decision making process. These characteristics include motivation, perception, beliefs and
attitudes and learning (Elliott, Rundle-Thiele & Waller 2014, pp. 134-9). For example, if a
customer perceives a product to be the best in that product category they may not go through
the information search and evaluation of options stages when making the purchase. Because of
the absence of these stages the structural integrity of the process can be questioned.
To add to the ambiguity of the consumer decision making process, the 5 steps may not
consistently be in the same order. In terms of order, need/want recognition, purchase and
post-purchase evaluation are set in stone but the information search and evaluation of options
stages are interchangeable. Sometimes when investigating a product one may evaluate their
options first to see what is feasible to purchase and then find information about those
products. On high involvement purchases it is also a common trend that customers complete a
partial information search, evaluate options, do a comprehensive information search then
repeat the evaluation of options with the supplementary information. For instance, when
buying an expensive car one may repeat these steps many times so that the right decision can
be accomplished without regret. This therefore discredits the consistent structure of the
consumer decision making process.
pg. 3
LUKE MEYER
CONSUMER DECISION MAKING PROCESS
congruency of the situation and the person. In most cases the process is present in the way the
model states but this is not always the case. The model cannot exist when there is only one
option to choose from therefore excluding decisions. Personal and psychological characteristics
also govern the existence and order of the 5 stages of the decision making process. The
application of the consumer decision making process can be widely applied but the exceptions
have to be considered by managers and marketers. These exceptions should be accounted for
when creating a marketing strategy in order for it to be highly beneficial.
Word Count: 907
Reference List
Ballasy N 2011, Obama: Forcing People to Buy Health Insurance Should Not Be Controversial,
CSNNews.com, viewed 11 April 2016, <http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-forcingpeople-buy-health-insurance-should-not-be-controversial>.
Elliott, G, Rundle-Thiele, S, Waller, D 2014, Marketing, 3rd edn, John Wiley & Sons Australia,
Queensland, Australia.
Kumra, R 2007, Consumer Behaviour, Himalaya Publishing House, Mumbai, IND.
Olshavsky, RW & Granbois DH 1979, Consumer Decision Making Fact or Fiction?, Journal of
Consumer Research, viewed 12 April 2016,
<http://jcr.oxfordjournals.org.ezproxy.flinders.edu.au/content/6/2/93>.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2015, Read the Law, Washington D.C., viewed
11 April 2016, <http://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/about-the-law/read-the-law/index.html>.
pg. 4