Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Ren Hailan
Wuhan Research Institute of Post &
Telecommunication
Agenda
Background of FTTH
FTTH in China
Telecommunication Trends
Broadband
Broadband Access
High Capacity Transport
Optical Transport
High Capacity Components
Convergence
Multiple Services
Transport-bearer
Access Technologies
Fixed-mobile
Personalization
Mobility
Personalized Services
Next Generation
Wireless Network
3G\WLAN\WIMAX
Softswitch
Service driven
With switching as the core
Next Generation
Transport Network
ASON/WDM
Next Generation
Internet
IPV6
D i al U p
5 6K
AD S L
1-20M
F T Tx + V DS L
5 0M
FT T H
100M
Separated Converged
Single Service
Integrated Services
Broadband
Narrowband
Integrated
Single
Integrated
Service
service
Fixed
Wireless
Why FTTH?
Market
Technology
Competition
Regulation
Backbone
160X10G DWDM
ULH: 10G 3000km
40G SDH
Metro
MSTP
CWDM/DWDM
Metro GE
Access
ASIC
Dial-Up
ADSL
LAN
Mores Law
Access rate
WiMAX
Wi Fi
Agenda
Background of FTTH
FTTH in China
Japan
United States
245,000 FTTH users in July 2003 with 10M as the typical bandwidth
Provide E-magazine, VOIP phone, etc.
Italy
Sweden
FTTH users from 531,000 in July 2003 to 2.03 million in Sept 2004
Forecast 7.7 million by 2007
Asia
44%
CALA
2%
EMEA
25%
CALA
0%
EMEA
21%
Asia
71%
Agenda
Background of FTTH
FTTH in China
Access Network
Access Network
The network portion between CO and the user
Function includes cross connect, multiplexing, transport, but no
switching
Also known as local network, local loop, or subscriber loop
ONU
S/R
R/S
ODN
AF
Service
node
functions
OLT
ONU
(V) reference point
SNI
Network side
T1520720-96
N
T
FTTH
fibre
copper
copper
h om e
n etw ork
O
N
U
F T T B /C
fibre
O
N
U
O
L
T
FTTCab
fibre
SN I
T 1 5 28 1 1 0 -9 8
Terminologies
FTTx
Fiber
Copper
CO
CO
Splitter
Active
Module
FTTH Defined
ITU-T: Fiber to the householdno copper
between CO and households
FTTO Example
Building A
Building B
Company E
BP5001
(ONU)
Internet
Company A
Company F
Company B
Teleom
building
Company G
Company C
Company H
Company D
(ODN)
Company I
BP5012
(OLT)
Basement
E1/T1 Convergence
EPON access
N fibers
Existing PDH
access
1 fiber
FTTH Example
High-end
High-end
MDU
MDU
House
User Part
Access Part
PSTN
OLT
ODN
Internet
ONU
CATV Net
1-20km
50-300m
PSTN
OLT
MSTP
Network
Side
OLT
Internet
Internet
CATV Net
CATV Net
WLAN
RJ45
Home Side
Cable
ONU
RJ11
Fiber
ONU
75
75
Fiber-D
1
2
CO
(1, 3, 5 )
WDM
(2, 4 6, )
1
2
1
2
3
4
CO
TDM
CO
5
6
1
2
1
2
1
2
FTTH Architectures
Single level P2P
N pair of low speed O-modules
N long fibers
N ports at CO
No active components
No b/w limitation
CO
CO
CO
PON
N+1of low speed O-modules
1 long fiber + N short fibers
1 ports at CO
No active components
No b/w limitation
CO
1.55
TDM
OLT
PSTN
VSB-AM
Filter-2
1:32
1.55
.
.
.
CATV
Internet
Filter-1
1:16
1.49
1.31
.
.
.
TDM
1.49
1.31
PON
N ports
OLT
31 port
OLT
N fibers
low speed module
1 1 fiber
5 high speed module
2N transceivers
2 N+1 transceivers
FTTH Topology
APON
EPON
GPON
ATM encapsulation
Proposed by FSAN
standardized by ITU-T
Ethernet encapsulation
GEM encapsulation
Standard mature
Standard on going
To be replaced
Few vendors
Different encapsulation
GPON
v id e o
v id e o
L5
EPON
v id e o
POTS
POTS
POTS
d a ta
TDM
d a ta
d a ta
TDM
TDM
L4
T C P /U D P
T C P /U D P
T C P /U D P
L3
IP
IP
IP
IE T F
ETH
L2
A A L 1 /2
PW E
AAL5
A T M C e ll
L1
ETH
G E M F ra m e
P O N P h y s ic a l L a y e r
E th e rn e t F ra m e
EPON: Multiplexing
EPON use WDM to realize bi-directional transport on a
single fiber
1490nm
1310nm
EPON: Downstream
Broadcasting mode
ONU-specific
packet
ONU-specific
packet
Splitter
Variable length
packets IEEE 802.3
format
After registration, ONU is assigned unique LLID(s)
Before transmitting a packet, an LLID was added into every packet
After receiving a packet, OLT compares the LLID with its LLID registration
listONU only accepts those packet that has its own LLID or broadcasting
packet
EPON: Upstream
TDMA mode
ONU-specific
packet
ONU-specific
packet
End-user 1
End-user 2
Packet in IEEE 802.3 format
with viable length
End-user 3
OLT
ONU
PON Protection
Trunk only protection
Full protection
Equipments
APON
EPON
GPON
WDMPON
Components
Cable
Accessories
Agenda
Background of FTTH
FTTH in China
Mb/s
126G
IP/PSTN = 32
100000
80000
Internet
60000
40000
20000
Leased line
PSTN
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004.9
China Domestic
Backbone IP Traffic Growth
20000
18000
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
18263
Tbyte/m
260 increase per year !
7193
2174
364
2000.5
2001.5
2002.5
2003.5
wealthy
distance
B/w
Small
business
high
high
close-far
high
8%
Luxury
district
medium
high
mediumfar
high
5%
MDU
high
medium
closemedium
medium
-high
72%
Remote
residence
low
low
far
low
15%
Stage 2
Stage 3
Research and
development
Commercial deployment
and operation
Phase1Testing
Phase3Small Scale
Deployment
Equipment maturity
and availability
Operation and
maintenance
Phase2Field Trial
Deployment and
business model
2003.11
2004.6
2004.12
2005.9
2006.6
2007
Applications
Standardization
FTTH forum
Major issues
Major Players
Vendors
Service providers
Equipment
UTStarcom (EPON)
Greenwill (EPON)
ZTE (EPON)
Telecos
China Telecom
China Netcom
China Mobile
China Unicom
Fiber/Cable
Fiberhome
Changfei
Hengtong
WTD
Fiberxon
Accelink
Tailong
Service requirements
Enough CO space
Subs are sparsely located and their distances to CO are quite
different
High scalability requirements in # of users and b/w
Limited CO space
Subs are closely located and their distances to CO similar
Low scalability in # of users and b/w
Point-point SDH
Point-point Ethernet
For sparsely located home and small business which does not
need lot of leased line services
EPON or GPON?
Optical level
No big difference
Cost
Conclusion
EPON and GPON suitable for
different environments
EPON is cheaper
Encapsulation efficiency
Commonly accepted: EPONs efficiency is less than 50
GPONs great than 90
It all depends on what service: Ethernet? TDM?
In reality, almost all the IP services carried over Ethernet
Maturity
EPON is more mature
SS7
Media Server
Application Server
IN
Billing Server
SS7
PSTN
FHX 5000
SGW
SGW
NodeB
FHX 8000
MSC-S/VLR
RNC
Softswitch
NodeB
3G Core Network
Circuit Domain
MGW
HLR
NodeB
MAISP8000
Converge
Router
NodeB
RNC
SGSN
Node
B
GGSN
3G Core Network
Packet Domain
Fiberhome
Force10 Core
Router
R4000 Series
Convergence
Router
PSTN
Broadband
AN3000 Series
IAS Remote
Narrowband
d
AN3000 Series
rater
g
e
t
In eare
B o rm
IAS at CO
f
Plat
FHX 3000
BP5000 EPON
MGW
BP5000 EPON
ONT
ODN
OLT
1:64
R3000 Series
Edge Router
AN2000 Series
DSLAM
VDSL2
S3000 Series
Layer 3 Switch
Edge access
PDA
BWA end
user
WLAN
AP
Mobile
Data
S2000 Series
Layer 2 Switch
FHX 1000 Series
IAD
NodeB
Broadband
Wireless
Access
ADSL
ADSL2+
BWA
at CO
MSTP
Citrans Series
MSTP
Products
Metro DWDM
Citrans 830
Series CWDM
Citrans 850
Series Metro
DWDM
MSTP
ASON
FonsWeaver 640
FONST
W1600
Long Haul
DWDM
Citrans Series
MSTP
Products
Edge Access
Metro DWDM
Citrans 850
series Metro
DWDM
Citrans
830Series
CWDM
Enterprise
Customers
Government
Customers
Complete accessories
CATV, DTV
Evolution to Soft-switching
MGC
FHX8000
Metro Network
H.248
GE
.
.
.
Integrated MG
H323
ANM2000
H323Gatekeeper
FHX3000
V.5/PRI
PSTN
Data100M/family
PSTN
ODN
V5
CATV
BP5005
GE
Metro IP
ODN
FTTH Cables
Backbone Cable
Access Cable
Drop Cable
Indoor Cable
Deployment Model
Operation Model
Cabinet
CO
PC
Phone
Leading cable
4 large scale
network
technology discussion
5 vendors
EPON
for testing
equipment
testing
demonstration
First
commercial
deployment
The five vendors are Fiberhome, Utstarcom, ZTE, Huawei, and Gaohong
FTTH Cost
CAPEX
Operation
Maintenance
Equipment
60%
Construction
21%
Engineering
design
4%
Fiber
3%
DN Components
12%
Upgrade
2005
2006
2007
2008
Services
2005
2006
2008
2005
2006
2008
1590
1350
900
1200
1000
600
Internet +
voice
1950
1500
1000
1430
1100
750
Triple play
4400
3080
1800
3000
2100
1400
Internet
only
Services
2005
2006
2008
Total
Total
Total
Internet Only
1590
1500
3090
1350
1100
2450
900
700
1600
Internet +
voice
1950
1700
3650
1500
1300
2800
1000
800
1800
Triple-play
4400
2000
6400
3080
1500
4580
1800
900
2700
2005
Services
2006
Total
Internet only
1200
1000
2200
Internet +
voice
1430
1250
Triple-play
3000
1500
2008
Total
Total
1000
700
1700
600
400
1000
2680
1100
900
2000
750
500
1250
4500
2100
1100
3200
1400
700
2100
Year 1
35
1,785
Year 2
50
2,550
Year 3
60
3,060
OLT800/line4000 line
3,200
ONU1000/each
1,785
765
510
FTTP Cable800/each
4,080
CAPEX in Total
9,065
9,830
10,340
4,241.2
6,058.8
7,270.6
Installation fee1800/sub
3,213
1,377
918
Revenue in total
7,454.2
14,890
23,078.6
362.6
393.2
423.6
10
1,490.8
2,978
4,615.7
11
Real revenue
5,600.8
11,518
18,039.3
Challenges
No killer applications
Opportunities
Deployment planned
More than 20 FTTH deployments are on-going with the largest of 2000 subs
A large residential FTTH in Wuhan with more than 16000 residents
China Netcom considering FTTO for Beijing CBD
2008 Beijing Olympics prefers FTTDesk and FTTH
Experience and encouragement from Japan and US
Summary
Thank You