Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Abstract
Despite a number of recent studies on the production of
multiphonics in woodwinds, an exhaustive study on the
perception of these sonorities is still missing. In this work
we undertake a comparative study of saxophone multiphonics from the musical, perceptual and acoustical points of
view. We propose four major classes based on the analysis
of the musical attributes and playing techniques of a set of
118 alto saxophone multiphonics, spanning all the possible
sonorities previously reported. Then, we perform a dissimilarity rating experiment for all possible pairs of a subset of
fteen representative multiphonics. This experiment
provides condence in the suggested classication, since the
four classes are segregated in a Multidimensional Scaling
(MDS) representation. We also nd two possible acoustical
correlates of the perceptual dimensions: the spectral centroid
(SC) and the modulation frequency (MF). Finally, this last
representation is explored through morphing trajectories,
which correspond to multiphonics that change the timbre
and musical interval organization with xed ngering.
Keywords: timbre perception, saxophone multiphonics,
dissimilarity ratings, acoustic features, musical notation
1. Introduction
The development of extended techniques for traditional
musical instruments contributed not only to enlarge the
timbre variety but also to change the musical discourse
during the second half of the past century. In this context,
the appearance of multiphonics in woodwinds renewed the
existing repertoire for these instruments, stimulating the
*Correspondence: Laboratorio de Acstica y Percepcin Sonora, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, R. S. Pea 352, Bernal (B1876BXD),
Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: pr@lapso.org
2014 Taylor & Francis
203
Fig. 1. Four power spectrums of alto saxophone multiphonics. The solid vertical lines indicate the two principal frequencies; the dotted line
indicates the spectral centroid and the dark horizontal line corresponds to the distance between sidebands (and to the modulation frequency).
Each multiphonic belongs to one of the four proposed classes: (A) Multiharmonic, (B) Bichord, (C) Tremolo and (D) Complex Multiphonic.
204
2.1. Procedure
Due to the vast number of possible multiphonic tones
within the seven members of the saxophone family, we
decided to circumscribe the study to a set of 118 tones of
the alto saxophone, spanning all the possible sonorities
previously reported for this family member.
To analyse these tones from a musical point of view we
used two concepts introduced by Pierre Schaeffer, which
are closely related: reduced listening and sound object.
The reduced listening consists of listening to the sound in
a context-independent manner and for its own sake, by
removing its real or supposed source, the precedence, the
environment and the meaning it may convey. The concept
of sound object refers to every sound phenomenon and
event perceived as a whole, a coherent entity, and heard by
means of reduced listening, which targets it for itself,
independently of its origin or its meaning (Chion, 1983).
Also, Schaeffer proposed a typology for the sound
objects meant to be used in composition and analysis of
electroacoustic music (Schaeffer, 1966) and based on
morphological criteria, which are dened as the distinctive features or properties of the perceived sound objects
that allows identifying them (Chion, 1983).
For our multiphonics musical analysis we select three
features from Schaeffer criteria that are intimately related:
grain, quality of surface and iteration. The grain could be
dened as the microstructure of the matter of sound, that
can be more ne or coarse and which evokes by analogy
the tactile texture of a cloth or a mineral, or the visible
grain in a photograph or a surface. Schaeffer dened three
types of grain characterized by the sustainment of a sound:
resonance grain, for sounds without sustainment but that
are prolonged by resonance (e.g. the rapid tingling of a
resonating cymbal); rubbing grain, for maintained sounds,
often caused by the rasping of breath of the sustaining
agent (bow, or breath in a ute sound); iteration grain for
iterative sustainment (e.g. drum roll) (Chion, 1983). Once
having dened the grain type, we could dene the quality
of surface of a sound object as the relation within the type
of the grain and its evolution, considering that the quality
of surface of a sound would be smoother or rougher
depending of the type of grain and its evolution. For
example, we could say that the quality of surface of the
sound of a soprano clarinet playing the low register is
smoother than a drum roll, or that the quality of surface of
the sound of the oboe is rougher than the ute. At last, the
idea of iteration is closely related to the type and size of
205
Fig. 2. Musical notation for examples of the four proposed multiphonic classes, one row for each class: (Bi) four multiphonics with a
Bichords sonority, (Mh) four multiphonics with a Multiharmonic sonority, (Cm) three multiphonics with a Complex Multiphonics sonority,
and (Tr) four multiphonics with a Tremolo sonority. Staff A: Alto saxophone in Eb. Staff B: Concert C. The multiphonics that are indicated
with (K*) refer to the number of the corresponding ngering in Kientzys catalogue (Kientzy, 1982). Multiphonics 5 and 10 are produced
with the same ngering.
206
Table 1. Summary of the main characteristics of the four classes proposed from the musical point of view, as a possible classication of
multiphonic tones of the alto saxophone: bichords, complex multiphonics, multiharmonics, and tremolos.
Sound production
Possibilities of
evolution:
Harmonics
emphasis
Dynamics
First musical
interval
Tessitura aprox.
(in C concert)
Consonance /
dissonance
Quality of surface
Bichords
Complex multiphonics
Multiharmonics
Tremolos
stable
moderate
relatively stable
moderate
unstable
moderate - low
middle
harmonics
pp < mf
3rd
high harmonics
equally distributed
mf < ff
9th
mp < f
8th (slightly detuned) and 9th
D4 - D5
D4 - C6
Gb3 - D6
Ab3 - F5
consonant
dissonant
consonant
relatively consonant
velvety
vocal tract, which turns the Tremolos into the most exible
sonority from those which we present here. Their production is quite simple and they resist dynamics from mp to f.
From the musical perspective of the analysis, we may
release some topics related to this preliminary classication.
First, concerning the notes and dynamical range, each
group we propose is delimited to a specic note range of
the saxophone, presents a characteristic musical interval
arrangement, and is circumscribed to a certain dynamic
range. From the point of view of the performer, they also
present a distinctive intonation, position of the vocal tract
and embouchure. Regarding the timbre, each class presents
a particular quality of surface, which is determined by the
size and type of the internal grain of the sound. Hence, we
could say that each of the sonorities proposed here is well
characterized and clearly delimited from each other. This
let us propose the four classes (Bichords, Complex
Multiphonics, Multiharmonics and Tremolos) as a possible
classication for the alto saxophone multiphonic tones.
The full set of 118 multiphonics was then divided into
21 Bichords, 39 Complex Multiphonics, 34 Multiharmonics
and 24 Tremolos. It is worth noting that, despite the fact
that the four classes are well dened, there is a small
number of multiphonics that does not t perfectly into any
group. These hybrid sonorities could be considered lying
in the borderline between classes.
207
208
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
209
Fig. 4. Boxplots of the selected spectral multiphonic features for each class (Bi=Bichord, Cm=Complex multiphonics, Mh=Multiharmonics,
Tr=Tremolos) and the whole set (All). A) spectral centroid (SC); B) Modulation Frequency MF; C) First principal frequency F1; D) Second
principal frequency F2; E) Musical interval MI between F1 and F2.
210
FM
SC
F1
F2
MI
2D Dim1
2D Dim2
3D Dim1
3D Dim2
3D Dim3
0.664 *
0.382
0.622 *
0.133
0.513
0.351
0.685 *
0.457
0.253
0.179
0.775*
0.019
0.775 *
0.530 *
0.260
0.203
0.720*
0.285
0.226
0.036
0.082
0.543 *
0.257
0.633 *
0.896 *
5. Discussion
Having a space dened by acoustical parameters might be
useful for several purposes. From the point of view of the
classication scheme proposed, it assigns each group to a
region that can be used a posteriori to classify other
multiphonic tones. In Figure 8 we display the same data as
in Figure 7, but adding shaded regions that cover the whole
space. These regions were obtained using a naive Bayes
211
Fig. 9. Musical notation corresponding to a morphing between Multiharmonics and Tremolos. (Black dotted line in Figure 8.)
Fig. 10. Musical notation corresponding to a morphing between Multiharmonics and Complex Multiphonics (grey dotted line in Figure 8).
212
References
Backus, J. (1978). Multiphonic tones in the woodwind
instruments. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 63, 591. doi:10.1121/1.381758
Bartolozzi, B. (1967). New sounds for woodwinds. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Beauchamp, J. W. (1982). Synthesis by spectral amplitude
and Brightness matching of analyzed musical instrument
tones. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 30,
396406.
Benade, A. H. (1990). Fundamentals of Musical Acoustics
(2nd ed.). New York, NY: Dover Publications.
Caclin, A., McAdams, S., Smith, B. K., & Winsberg, S.
(2005). Acoustic correlates of timbre space dimensions: A
conrmatory study using synthetic tones. The Journal of
the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 471. doi:10.1121/
1.192922
Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J. J. (1970). Analysis of individual
differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way
generalization of Eckart-Young decomposition. Psychometrika, 35, 283319.
Chen, J.-M., Smith, J., & Wolfe, J. (2011). Saxophonists tune
vocal tract resonances in advanced performance techniques.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129,
451426. doi:10.1121/1.3514423
Chion, M. (1983). Guide des Objects Sonores, Pierre
Schaeffer et la recherche musicale. Paris: Buchet/Chastel.
Donnadieu, S. (2007). Mental representation of the timbre of
complex sounds. In J. W. Beauchamp (Ed.), Analysis,
synthesis, and perception of musical sounds (pp. 272319).
New York, NY: Springer.
Gottfried, R. (2008) A more accurate notation for multiphonics
using sideband ratios. In www.ramagottfried.com/texts/
rama_gottfried_multiphonics.pdf
Grey, J. M. (1977). Multidimensional perceptual scaling of
musical timbres. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 61, 12701277.
Keefe, D. H., & Laden, B. (1991). Correlation dimension of
woodwind multiphonic tones. The Journal of the Acoustical
Society of America, 90, 17541765.
Kientzy, D. (1982). Les sons multiples aux saxophones. Paris:
Salabert.
Londeix, J. M. (1989). Hello Mr. Sax, ou, Paramtres du
saxophone. Paris: Alphonse Leduc.
Proscia, M. (2011). Acercamiento al saxofn multifnico, una
perspectiva de estudio. In Revista del Instituto Superior de
Msica 13 (pp. 171194). Santa F: Universidad Nacional
del Litoral.
Proscia, M., Riera, P., & Egua, M. (2011). Estudio
comparativo del saxofn multifnico a partir de diferentes
herramientas de anlisis perceptivo. In Musicalidad Humana: Debates actuales en evolucin, desarrollo y cognicin e
implicancias socio-culturales. Actas del X Encuentro de
Ciencias Cognitivas de la Msica (pp. 317325). Buenos
Aires: SACCOM.
Scavone, G. P., Lefebvre, A., & da Silva, A. R. (2008).
Measurement of vocal-tract inuence during saxophone
performance. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 123, 23912400. doi:10.1121/1.2839900
213