Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
-example of the pin maker…by dividing up the stages of making the pin, u can make many more than if one person made a pin from start to
finish (pg. 37)
-division of labor doesn’t work so well in agriculture as in manufacturing b/c labor isn’t easily separated (pg.38)
-position of the official (ok this part wasn’t on the review sheet so its very brief)
1. office holding is a “vocation” pg. 74-75
2. personal position of the official is patterned in the following way:
a.modern official has social esteem (75)
b.pure type of bureaucratic official is appointed by a superior authority (76)
c. position of official is held for life/ tenure for life (77)
d. official receives pecuniary compensation of a fixed salary (77)
e. official is set for a career within the hierarchial order of the public service
Key Figures:
1. Frederick Winslow Taylor
2. Henry Ford
3. (Chester Barnard)
4. Morris Cooke
5. Frank Gilbeth
- Henry Ford
• Pioneer of “assembly line”
• Broke car system down so regular people could buy a car
• Was more efficient, so became more productive (Tin Lizzie pg. 55)
• Increased wages
• Setup model of centralization
- Key Information
• 4 Principles of Scientific Management (Shaff. & Ott. Pg 65-66)
o Deliberate gathering together of great mass of traditional knowledge
o Scientific selection of the workman & his progressive development
o Bringing together of science and trained workmen
o Complete re-division of the work of the establishment
• Increased productivity
o Price decreased
o People can afford more
o Convert non-buyers into buyers
o Also increased wages
• Established white collar management
• Created labor saving devices (Shaff. & Ott. Pg 62)
• Scientific Management can’t exist w/o mental revolution (Shaff. & Ott. Pg 64)
• Set-up dynamic assembly line management
• Labor was now cheaper w/ division of labor (Shaff. & Ott. Pg 66)
o Less skilled workers replacing specialization (Shaff. & Ott. Pg 70)
o People are easily replaceable
• Was the beginning of globalization
• Fordism refers to the system of mass production and consumption characteristic of highly developed economies during the 1940s-
1960s. Under Fordism, mass consumption combined with mass production to produce sustained economic growth and widespread
material advancement.
• Caused people to go insane (b/c they’re performing same task 24/7)
o Boredom also caused much damage in workplace
• Shifted the class systems
Shafritz & Ott: Herbert Simon "The Proverbs of Administration" (pg. 112-124)
• Proverbs (pg. 112)
1) always occur in mutually contradictory pairs
2) scientific theory should tell what’s true, but also what’s false
3) with proverbs as basis of administrative theory, for almost every principle one can find an equally plausible and acceptable
contradictory principle (two principles of the pair will lead to exactly opposite organizational recommendations, but there is nothing
in the theory to indicate which is the proper one to apply)
• Specialization (pg. 113)
1) principle: administrative efficiency is increased by a specialization of the task among the group
2) which alternative is correct: specialization by place or specialization by function
3) simplicity of the principle is deceptive, conceals fundamental ambiguities
4) “specialization” is an inevitable characteristic of group effort: real problems is not just to specialize, but to specialize in that
particular manner and along those particular lines which will lead to administrative efficiency
• Unity of Command (pg. 113-114)
1) principle: administrative efficiency is increased by arranging the members of the group in a determinate hierarchy of authority in
order to preserve unity of command
2) principle of unity of command cannot be violated in any group
3) incompatible with the principle of specialization
4) perhaps more defensible if narrowed down to: in case two authoritative command conflict, there should be a single determinate
person whom the subordinate is expected to obey, and the sanctions of authority should be applied against the subordinate only to
enforce his obedience to that one person
• Span of Control (pg. 114-116)
1) principle: administrative efficiency is increased by limiting the span of control at any point in the hierarchy to a small number
2) contradictory principle/proverb of administration: administrative efficiency is enhanced by keeping at a minimum the number of
organizational levels through which a matter must pass before it is acted upon
3) dilemma: in a large organization with complex interrelations between members, a restricted span of control inevitably produced
excessive red tape, for each contact between organization members must be carried upward until a common superior is found
4) both increase and decrease in span of control has some undesirable consequences – what is the optimum point? the principle as
stated casts no light on this very crucial question
• Organization by Purpose, Process, Clientele, Place (pg. 116-119)
1) principle: administrative efficiency is increased by grouping the workers, for purposes of control, according to purpose, process,
clientele, or place
2) internally inconsistent principle: purpose, process, clientele, and place are competing bases of organization, and at any given point
of division the advantages of three must be sacrificed to secure the advantages of the fourth
3) dilemma of choosing between alternative, equally plausible, administrative principles
4) no essential difference between a “purpose” and a “process,” but only a distinction of degree (a process is an activity whose
immediate purpose is at a low level in the hierarchy of means and ends; a purpose is a collection of activities whose orienting value
or aim is at a high level in the means-end hierarchy)
5) “clientele” and “place” are part of “purpose”
6) even with problem solved of proper usage of the terms, the principles of administration give no guide as to which of these 4
competing bases of specialization is applicable in any particular situation
• An Approach to Administrative Theory
1) description of administrative situations – develop a set of concepts that will permit the description in terms relevant to the theory of
administrative situations
WHC LL (A Midterm Corporation)
Gov121- Organization and Management
Page 6 of 17
2) diagnosis of administrative situations – among several alternatives involving the same expenditure one should always be selected
which leads to the greatest accomplishment of administrative objectives
3) assigning weights to the criteria – solving problems according to their relative importance in any concrete situation
Shafritz & Ott: Burns and Stalker, "Mechanistic and Organic Systems" (pg. 198-202)
• Two polar extremities of the forms that management systems can take when they are adapted to a specific rate of technical and commercial
change
• Mechanistic management system: appropriate to stable conditions
1) specialized differentiation of functional tasks – problems/tasks as a whole are broken down
2) abstract nature of each individual task
3) reconciliation of the distinct performances by the immediate superiors
4) precise definition of rights, obligations, and technical methods
5) translation of rights/obligations/methods into the responsibilities of a functional position
6) hierarchic structure of control, authority, and communication
7) reinforcement of hierarchic structure of location of knowledge exclusively at the top
8) tendency for interaction between members of the concern to be vertical
9) tendency for operations and working behavior to be governed by instructions and decisions of superiors
10) insistence on loyalty and obedience as a condition of membership
11) greater importance and prestige attached to internal than to general knowledge, experience, and skill
• Organic management system: appropriate to changing conditions
1) contributive nature of special knowledge and experience to the common task
2) “realistic” nature of the individual task
3) adjustment and continual redefinition of individual tasks through interactions with others
4) shedding of “responsibility” as a limited field of rights, obligations and methods
5) spread of commitment beyond any technical definition
6) network structure of control, authority, and communication
7) omniscience no longer imputed to the head; knowledge about the technical or commercial nature of the here and now task may be
located anywhere in the network
8) lateral rather than vertical direction of communication; communication between people of different rank resembling consultation
rather than command
9) content of communication which consists of information and advice rather than instructions and decisions
10) commitment to tasks and “technological ethos” of material progress an expansion more highly valued than loyalty and obedience
11) importance and prestige attach to affiliation and expertise valid in the industrial, technical, and commercial setting external to the
firm
Shafritz & Ott: Mary Parker Follett, "The Giving of Orders" (pg. 152-157)
• issuing orders is surrounded by many difficulties
• unless you change the habit-patterns of people, you have not really changed your people
1) build up certain attitudes
2) provide for the release of these attitudes
3) augment the released response as it is being carried out
• orders will not take the place of training
• the giving of orders and the receiving of orders ought to be a matter of integration through circular behavior
1) before the integration can be made, there is often an integration to be made within one or both of the individuals concerned
2) often are two dissociated paths in the individual – business administration has often to consider how to deal with the disassociated
paths in individuals or groups
3) an order should seek to unite , to integrate, dissociated paths
• probably more industrial trouble has been caused by the manner in which orders are given than in any other way
1) the addressed man feels that his self-respect is attacked, that one of his most inner sanctuaries is invaded
2) the more you are “bossed” the more your activity of though will take place within the bossing-pattern, and your part in that pattern
seems usually to be opposition to the bossing
• opposite extreme: immediate superior officer is often so close to the worker that he does not exercise the proper duties of his position
• how to avoid the two extremes?
1) depersonalize the giving of orders
2) unite all concerned in a study of the situation
3) discover the law of the situation and obey that
• depersonalizing orders
1) one of the largest contributions of scientific management
2) no overbearing authority on the one hand, nor on the other that dangerous laissez-aller which comes from the fear of exercising
authority
WHC LL (A Midterm Corporation)
Gov121- Organization and Management
Page 7 of 17
3) really a matter of repersonalizing: we, persons, have relations with each other, but we should find them in and through the whole
situation – a divorcing of persons and the situation does a great deal of harm
• question of authority and consent: it is alright to work with anyone, what is disagreeable is to feel too distinctly that you are working under
anyone
• how can you expect people to merely to obey orders and at the same time to take that degree of responsibility which they should take? the
reconciliation between receiving orders and taking responsibility can be made through our conception of the law of the situation
• the evolving situation: the situation is changing while orders are being carried out. External orders can never keep up the situation, only
those drawn fresh from the situation
Shafritz & Ott: Philip Selznick, "The Foundations of a Theory of Organization" (pg. 125-134)
• Structural-Functional Analysis
1) security of the organization as a whole in relation to social forces in its environment
2) stability of the lines of authority and communication
3) stability of informal relations within the organization
4) continuity of policy and of the sources of its determination
5) homogeneity of outlook with respect to the meaning and role of the organization
• Co-optation as a mechanism of adjustment
1) Co-optation is the process of absorbing new elements into the leadership or policy-determining structure of an organization as a
means of averting threats to its stability or existence
2) used when there exists a hiatus between consent and control, so that the legitimacy of the formal authority is called into question
3) response of the pressure of specific centers of power
4) reflects a state of tension between a formal authority and social power
5) significance is not simply that there is a change in or broadening of leadership, and that this is an adaptive response, but also that
this change is consequential for the character and role of the organization
I find the works of Drucker to be tremendous works not just of organizational theory but general wisdom and therefore exceed the needs of
students or active managers looking to implement his methods. His writing is replete with succinct tidbits of wisdom that ultimately convey
more than his overall conclusions in their simplicity. As there are no real graphs or pictures and most of the text is the set-up, explanation,
detail or disclaimer that goes with these tidbits through supporting cases and stories, I have attempted to include the most direct and all-
encompassing quotes for ease of comprehension. For quickest consumption, refer to the final bullet point of each chapter and focus on the
quoted tidbits to add punch to your arguments.
The Management Boom (25 years from end of WWII to end of 1960s)
In post WWII, Sir Stafford Cripps conceived of man as force that could restore British econ and provide impetus for growth and performance.
The MARSHALL Plan supported this effort; Japanese followed the West and took management as a central force in rebuilding. But the boom
seemed to have burst in 1970. While it is no longer the hot new trend (as far as this book is concerned given my copy states 1973) there are a
number of lessons to be learned on how you properly apply management to organizations.
Ultimately, management is a generic function, a discipline, that every organization in any situation faces. As it directs vision and resources
towards a greater goal it consistently deals with problems of leading workers towards productivity and achievement.
Work has become a very complicated concept in this era especially when compared to play, idleness and in consideration of different
types. (p.168)
The working class is currently pressured as trends towards more education and managerial positions increase. The end result is
decreased social position and status, which is unlike the proud predecessor who understood their place as the core of America’s
manufacturing and such.
Unions are weaker due to the separation between union leaders and union workers as one of “them” instead of one of “us.” Also the
changing nature of worker complicates things.
A new undertaking, managing knowledge workers must take a different tack from that of manual laborers. Self-motivation and
direction are keys. Quantifying production and achievement are much more difficult.
The labor force can be segregated by sex, clerical, manual, knowledge, and age.
All traditional elements are now challenged. The structure and character of work has changed such that it must provide a life not
simply means of earning a living. New workers have high expectations, and look for work to be not necessarily enjoyable but
achieving.
Redistribution of or resources is a political decision rather than an economic one. All firms have to deal with how to distribute firm
returns amongst employees.
WHC LL (A Midterm Corporation)
Gov121- Organization and Management
Page 12 of 17
• Fallacy of the dominant dimension: (p.194)
While Marx saw the economic dimension as the superior and Mayo saw the interpersonal relations as superior we must understand in
accordance with Maslow’s “marginal utility” that wants are not absolute and change as they are satisfied. This leaves the manager
with the task of covering all these elements simultaneously to maintain productivity.
“Work analysis does not begin with identifying operations. It begins with defining the desired end product.”
Work Study, Scientific management, and industrial engineering encompass the traditional analysis of work. All of these measures fail
to incorporate the consideration of the end product, the logic of work as well as working and the overall process of production as a
whole job.
Production is the application of logic to work and includes 4 basic systems models. The right process needs to be selected for firm
success.
• Process 1, Unique-Product Production (p.205) Standardized tools are always used for unique-products and usually standardized
materials. Work is organized by homogenous stages where work can stop after each stage. Workers must be able to do all the work
necessary for a particular stage, so it is based on stage skills not craft skills.
Parts are standardized as well here, so products are not made they are assembled. Flexible includes multiple outputs.
Classic example: Oil refinery. On integrated system with no stages. This should be the goal for all previous processes. There are
huge economies when properly placed yet when misapplied due to its rigidity the costs are high.
P1 is labor-intensive, has great flexibility places high demand on skill and low on judgment. Management’s first job is to get an order.
P2 is also labor-intensive and requires high volume. Minor fluctuations affect the economies of the system. High degree of judgment
in design but none in operations. Management’s first job is to ensure proper distribution here and in P3.
P4 requires high capital investment and is not labor intensive. The maintenance of markets is the primary concern here.
The process of production needs built-in controls for its direction, quality, quantity, standards, and its efficiency. Control needs to be
exercised where the malfunction is likely to occur in the most minimal fashion.
A control system need to be able to distinguish exception from the normal, but so much as to make order out of chaos. The
“differential diagnosis” is an ideal to model as doctors used this to go through a preset order of ascertainable systems to eliminate one-
by-one all the possible problems.
Fit the right tools to the job. Provide the simplest, smallest, lightest, easiest tool for the job. The work does not exist for the sake of
the tool; the tool exists for the sake of the work. (p.224)
2 things to watch out for when mechanizing; One, don’t make man part of the machine, Two, don’t use tools as divisive elements that
ruin community bonds.
While most work up until recently has been manual the same processes can be transferred to service industries. Work analysis,
principles of production, controls, and tools have been proven successful everywhere except in the generation of new knowledge.
Understanding these 4 points are essential to making work productive.
McGregor’s “Human side of the Enterprise” introduces 2 theories. Theory X where humans are understood to be lazy and shun work
and need both carrot and stick motivation. Theory Y believes people have a psychological need for responsibility and achievement.
Maslow supports Theory Y yet thinks it is inhuman to place theory Y expectations on most people as they are too weak to shoulder the
burden. He concluded that the restraints and certainty of a theory X system needed to be replaced by those of a theory Y system not
simply removed. Y systems have to do otherwise they leave humans with demands they cannot meet.
McClelland continues from here to show the desire to achieve is largely conditioned by culture and experiences so people can be
“turned on” or off based on situations, which is not accounted for in either X or Y theories.
“Big Fear” motivates where it is truly credible but there are few instances of this. “Little Fear” is a foolish tool for motivation that
simply results in resentment and resistance. As components of a theory X framework both are incorrect.
Unlike “Fear,” incentives have not lost their potency but have become harder to control. The demand for more increases limitlessly
(directly due to Maslow’s rule) and as it progresses equally reduces the value of incentives overall. The new breed of manual workers
who have not achieved through their lives respond to motivational tools with sabotage not increased performance. Discipline nor
incentive can be used by a manager as he is not a master but a fellow employee who is just superior.
More than Theory Y is necessary however; managers are unable to manage the psychological needs of all their workers. Carrot and
stick methods have lost their potency along with other theory X methods. Managers must assume that people will work to achieve
only if given the opportunity to do so.
As people are generally unemployable past 30, this creates tremendous conformity and huge incentive to ensure the company does not
go under. There is little wage carrot offered.
Flexibility in labor costs is achieved by treating women as perennial temporary workers. Retirement at 55 helps. The overall system
provides the Japanese worker psychological conviction of job and income security.
The Japanese system customizes the benefit system to their group of workers’ needs.
Mentors, senior veteran managers, are informally assigned to young up and coming employees and this helps senior management on a
whole to watch their development. The young employee receives support as well as discipline at times.
At every level of the organization, subordinates are expected to participate in the responsibility for the decision.
Abbe did well to manage working and the worker though a form of scientific management and production improvements. He insisted
that the employees be a part of the process creation and had them organize themselves. He also implemented continuous training.
Lastly, he created a foundation to own the firm which protects it from outside risks with little capital.
• IBM (p.260)
Supervisors are the assistants to their subordinates not their superiors. They maximize jobs by training people to do every possible
part of their stage and keep job instructors on hand to continuously help workers learn new methods. Also workers participated in the
engineering of the fist products released and returned better production numbers in every category. Now they continue the same
method for all products. Subsequently, there is heavy emphasis placed on training and placement to support the entire process.
• Lessons (p.263)
There are flaws in the primary methods that have created current problems for each firm despite their overall success.
Japanese approaches are rapidly becoming inappropriate to their social reality. Education is undermining their manual work force
and inflationary pressures threaten the all important wage structure.
Abbe’s Zeiss has restrictions on outside financing that eliminate ability to acquire the necessary capital for serious growth.
IBM cannot maintain employment security like it once could, and has issued layoff but not to its manual workers for which the policy
was intended.
The similar factor across all these examples is none of them allowed “permissive management” they focused on organizing
responsibility.
Focus must be on the job, achievement must be possible, to enable the worker to achieve he must be responsible. Therefore he must
do productive work, receive feedback and undergo continuous learning.
People do not come up with better ideas when freed from restraint.
Allows the worker the necessary information to measure and direct himself. He then does not need praise, he knows how well he is
doing.
The responsibility for this should go to the work group so that design goes to those responsible for output.
Assembly lines are also subject to variation and also improve when treated like a work-group issue especially when groups are
informed and undergo continuous training. In job enrichment the worker chooses the number of output, the speed, the sequence, and
the rhythm when given the units of output by a superior. This also shows higher output in result.
Worker responsibility is especially important for the new young manual worker, the pre-industrial and the knowledge worker. The
new young manual worker has been described before as having resistance to being driven, insecurity about social position, limited
schooling and high propensity for sabotage.
• Pre-industrials (p.278)
Typically foreigners or those not at home in society who need a paternalistic environment.
The educated worker, who can not be motivated nor supervised, is only productive when responsible for his own job.
Worker responsibility may be the only way to restore health and function to the supervisor.
While not a democracy, the self governing work community places responsibility where the consequences of the decisions have to be
dealt with. A solid community includes all of the previously listed aspects.
Living in fear of loss of job or income is incompatible with the worker responsibilities initiatives.
Both these concepts need to be implemented further into western systems, with more options for vested pensions and retirement
benefits.
• Shortcomings (p.289)
Lack of financial flexibility arises when supporting income stability. Job mobility is a hurdle and increases fear of displacement for
workers despite the efforts of headhunters.
This shows that the fear of displacement is greater than the actual effect or statistical existence of displacement. The Rehn Plan would
underwrite the income of a redundant employee in case of technological advance and retrain them, even relocate them to keep them
employed. The result was an increase from non-player to #2 work force in the world behind U.S. in 1971.
The Rehn model shows the positive effects this can have on a work force.
Benefits are the area where a meaningful link between company profitability and worker needs can be created as they build the
worker’s capital fund not his wage fund. Profits have too little effect on wage fund to be of value.
1) Benefits need to be structured to give the worker the most for the money
2) Benefit floor needs to be fixed yet fluctuate with performance
3) Administer benefit programs in groups not individually
4) Administration should be responsibility of the work-community
Benefits already consist of 25% to 33% of total compensation packages, management should expect this to increase. Improving this
should improve productivity.
It makes top management stronger not weaker. The responsible worker, the responsible work-group and self-governing community
are decentralized components and they all help spread work management. In absence of sufficient carrot or stick methods the added
responsibility on the worker helps fill the authority void and cuts against cynicism which can destroy a firm internally.
Krupp example: Built excellent firm by selecting excellent workforce. Instituted paternalism; providing housing, schooling and more
for employees. Created tremendous firm loyalty which brought firm back from extinction twice, once after each World War.
Ultimately led to firm’s demise as they intended to offer lifetime employment and expanded even the losing operations of the firm.
“The purpose of an organization is to make the strengths of people productive and their weaknesses irrelevant.”
Defined: The methodical and systematic discharge of all the activities that have to be done where people are employed, including the
subsequent selection, employment, training, compensation, and any other necessary service involved.
Drucker relates P.M. to the effect of dirty dishes on a successful marriage; if allowed to pile up they may lead to a break-up, however
clean dishes have little effect on the happiness of the relationship.
Periods of serious issue in personnel management come from failures at managing people (the cost/threat method speaks to an
example of a serious issue like fighting against unions; this is also not managing people but rather costs).
Largely, firms approach labor as problem, procedure or cost instead of resource. Implementing “practices” is the best means to
achieving a personnel/resource focused group.
1st practice – Build responsibility and achievement, complete with specific objectives, into each job.
2nd practice – Have managers treat people as resources to himself with upward contribution directly supporting the manager’s
performance.
• Placement: (p.309)
The most important element in managing people is placing them where their strengths can be productive. Non-performers are often
not duds; they are simply in the wrong place. Traditional methods of interviewing and testing are debatable as justified selection
methods. Treating people as resources to managers is simply a “practice” but it does point organizations toward performance rather
than conformance.