Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ON
Developing a Power Procurement Plan for NPCL
At
August, 2009
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I am having great pleasure to present this report entitled Developing a Power Procurement
Plan for NPCL. I take this opportunity to express my sincere thanks to all who contributed to
make this a success.
I would like to express a deep sense of gratitude to Mr. R. C. Agarwala (CEO), Mr. Gautam
Gosh (General Manager), Mr. Sharad Sinha (Company Secretary), Mr. Rajiv Goyal (Sr. Mgr.
- Operation), Mr. S. Ganguly (Sr. Manager, Projects), and Mr. Sandeep Rai (HRD) for giving
me the opportunity for doing the project and providing all the necessary resources and expertise
for this purpose. I would like to express my sincere thanks to my guide Miss. Sudeepta
Mohapatra (Management Trainee, Operations) for her innovative and experienced hands on my
report without which I would not have been able to successfully accomplish this report.
I wish to make a special mention of Mr. A.V. Chaoji, (Principal Director-CAMPS), Mr. S.K.
Choudhary, (Director-CAMPS), Mr. J.S.S. Rao, (Director-CP) , N.P.T.I for providing me an
opportunity to do my summer internship at Noida Power Company Limited, Greater Noida,
which was a great learning for me.
I wish to thank my internal project guide Mrs. Indu Maheswari, (Deputy Director) NPTI for
her valuable inputs.
GAURAV KUMAR
DECLARATION
I, Gaurav Kumar, Roll No.23, Class MBA (Power Management) 2008-10 batch of the
National Power Training Institute, Faridabad here by declare that the summer training report
entitled Developing a Power Procurement Plan For NPCL is an original work and the same
has not been submitted to any institute for the award of any other degree. A seminar presentation
of the Training report was made on __________________and the suggestions as approved by the
faculty are duly incorporated.
Presentation In Charge
Gaurav Kumar
(Faculty)
(Signature of Candidate)
Counter signed:
Principal Director, N.P.T.I
Faridabad
INDEX
1. Acronyms6
2. Executive summary....7
3. Introduction of Power Sector of INDIA...........8
4. About Organization
4.1. Organization profile...........18
4.2. Business of the Organization..............20
4.3. Future prospects of the organization25
4.4. NPCL at Glance..........27
.
5. Executed Project
5.1. Objective of the Project.............31
5.2. Scope of the Project...................31
5.3. Significance of the Study...........31
5.4. Review of Literature..............32
5.5. Conceptualization...................32
6. Project Description
6.1. Procurement Period..........33
6.2. Procedure for Scheduling for Bilateral Transaction..................33
7. Power Procurement Process.48
8. Demand Estimation................50
9. Current Power Procurement Scenario of NPCL............51
10. Power Procurement Plan.................52
11. Demand Supply Scenario.................53
12. Charge involved in Power Procurement Process...........54
12.1. Transmission Charges..54
ACRONYMS
UPPCL
NPCL
CERC
KWh
Kilo-Watt-Hour
SEB
SLDC
RLDC
SCADA
SAP
GIS
NR
Northern Region
SR
Southern Region
WR
Western Region
ER
Eastern Region
NER
North-Eastern Region
HVDS
FY
Financial Year
MU
Million Units
KV
Kilo Volt
Sq. Km.
Square Kilometer
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The training in this esteemed organization NPCL, deals with determining the landed cost
of power for the distribution licensee from any generating company and the detail procedure for
scheduling for bilateral transaction.
The Electricity Act 2003 has already brought forth numerous changes in the electricity
sector. Enactment or the implementation of the act brought the opportunity of open access in
distribution and transmission. Customers having a choice in selection of their distributors under
open access provisions. This in turn requires distribution utility processes to undergo major
changes to evolve as a more customer friendly organization. And the business model would also
have to change from being an asset and engineering intensive business to a commercially driven
customer oriented businesses, which derive their value from their ability to attract and retain
customers.
The main aim is to determine landed cost which is the main part of the tariff as it become
important to providing reliable and quality power at affordable tariffs to meet the demand. The
summer internship report comprises of two section .The first section of the report provides an
overview of POWER SECTOR OF INDIA & also an overview of NPCL and the second
section of the report dwells completely with the overview of Power Procurement procedure
and also calculation of landed cost of power for NPCL from any generating company.
Landed cost calculation includes calculation of open access charge and energy charge
taking the transmission losses en route into consideration. The open access charge includes the
calculation of transmission charge and operating and scheduling charge. Transmission Charges
for use of each regional & state network involved shall be payable @ Rs. 80 per MWh
respectively vide Para 16 (3) CERC (Open Access in inter-State Transmission) Regulations,
2008 dated 25.01.2008) & Subsequent (Amendment) Regulations, (2009 dated 20.05.2009) ,
in case the transmission rate for various states are not declared by the state commissions.
3.1 Capacity
India's electricity generation capacity has been increasing continuously to meet the needs
of the rapidly growing economic activity of the country. Total installed capacity of electricity
generation has expanded from 1,05,045.96 MW at the end of 2001-02 to 1,43,311.01 MW by
2007-08 and further to 1,50,323.41MW at the end of June 2009. In fact, India ranks sixth
globally in terms of total electricity generation.
Total Installed Capacity (As on June 30, 2009)
Sector
MW
Per cent
State Sector
76,364.67
52.2
Central Sector
48,970.99
34.0
Private Sector
24,987.75
13.8
1,50,323.41
100
Total
Source: Ministry of Power, India.
Source-wise, thermal power plants accounted for an overwhelming 63.8 per cent of the total
installed capacity. Within this group, coal, gas and oil based thermal power plants accounted for
52.2 per cent, 10.9 per cent and 0.8 per cent, respectively. Hydel power plants come next with an
installed capacity of 36,916.76 MW, accounting for 24.6 per cent of the total installed electricity
generation capacity. Simultaneously, the total transmission lines network has been growing at a
robust pace to expand the transmission network. Total transmission lines have increased from
150642-circuit km (ckm) at the end of 2001-02 to 198089 ckm at the end of 2006-07.
For example, the total hydro power potential in India is a whopping 1, 50,000 MW. In
fact, the potential for growth is not confined to only conventional sources of power
supply/generation but is present in the renewable segment as well. In fact, India has the fourth
largest installed capacity on wind in the world.
Source/System
Estimated Potential
Achievement (as on 31
March 2009)
Wind Power
48,500
9587.00
15,000
2429.77
Bio Power
16,881
1677.00
84,776
13,242.41
power
Source: Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, India.
Significantly, to realize the Eleventh plan period target with respect to capacity additions,
already both the government and private players have been moving fast. As on 31 January 2008,
7263 MW of generation capacity has been commissioned and a whopping 50,860 MW of
capacity generation is under construction.
10
BILLION UNITS
GENERATION (BU)
752.4
800
662.52
700
617.5
586.4
558.3 587.4
531.6
600
515.2
499.5
500
380.1
400
264.3
300
200
100
0
GENERATION
11
100
90
80
69
70
60
69.6
72.1
72.7
74.8
73.6
76.8
77.7
63
53.8
CENTRAL
50
STATE
40
PRIVATE
OVERALL
30
20
10
0
1990-91 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
12
13
14
60000
50000
40000
30000
20000
26800
Hydro
24347
Thermal
16553
9685
10000
3380
3605
7497
3263
Nuclear
3380
0
central
state
private
total(c+s+p)
14000
12039.2
12000
9007.2
10000
8000
6000
4000
6449.2
4840
4767.2
state sectro
private sector
3490
2372
1682
690
2000
central sector
660
660
0
Thermal
Hydro
Nuclear
Total
15
5. The investment climate in the country is buoyant and as shown above large capacity is
currently under execution. Between 1st April 2008 to 31st January 2009 orders in respect of 22
projects aggregating 20245 MW were placed. Out of this 17 projects aggregating 18385 MW
pertain to thermal segment and 5projects aggregating 1860 MW pertain to hydro segment.
16
In the last five years including 2008-09 (April 2008 31st March, 2009), the
following new Capacities have been added:
4783
5000
4500
3890
4000
3500
3035
3000
2710
2230
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
1210
1100.1
548
1168.92
816.62
100
1488
1420
1671
1291.8
CENTRAL
STATE
660.8
70
PRIVATE
250
17
ORGANISATION PROFILE
Noida Power Company Limited (hereafter referred to as NPCL) is the first
private distribution company formed in India post 1991 power reforms vides
Memorandum of Understanding between Greater Noida Industrial Development
Authority and CESC Ltd. (RPG Group) to supplying electricity to the consumers in
Greater Noida area.
The Company is a joint venture between the RPG Group, a leading business house in
India and Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority, an autonomous body of U.P.
Government responsible for town planning and infrastructure development. The venture marks
the strategic entry of the Group into privatized distribution of electricity in North India.
The Company started its operations in December 1993 under a 30-year license from U.P.
Government. While the Government of Uttar Pradesh through Greater Noida Industrial
Development Authority holds 27% stake in the company, CESC (RPG Group) is
majority stake holder (73%) of the company with management control. NPCL obtained
a license from Govt. of Uttar Pradesh for carrying out distribution in the area of
Greater Noida as a private sector player in the distribution of electricity on 30 th
August 1993, which was subsequently amended on 18 th July 1996.
4.1.1 Vision
By 2012, we shall be the best electricity service provider in the country in terms of
Customer Perception.
4.1.2 Mission
To create the most exciting workplace for our employees, the best service environment
for our customers and the most preferred business enterprise for our partners.
18
19
BUSINESS OF ORGANISATION
Noida Power Company Limited distributes power in Greater Noida, near Delhi in Uttar
Pradesh, which is being developed as an industrial hub and urban settlements. The Company
reaches out to a population of about 2-lakh spread across hamlets, villages and a new township
spanning an area of 335 sq. km, which is one of the fastest growing industrial districts in
the region.
20
The Company recorded a sharp growth of 23% in energy sales owing to better
capacity utilization/ new capacity addition by the industries and also rising energy
consumption of other metered categories; the growth being particularly high i.e. 41%
in the domestic segment due to combined effect of increased occupancy in the urban
sectors and enhancement of power infrastructure in rural areas.
The power value chain starts from UPPCL transmission system, which
transmits power through its state transmission system to the 132/33 kV, Surajpur
substation where it is step down to 33 kV voltage level for evacuation by NPCL
through 7 feeders. These feeders supply power to 12 nos. 33/11 kV substations spread
over as per the load requirement in the licensed area. The Company has implemented
cutting edge technologies available in Distribution sector like Underground network,
HVDS and Aerial Bunched Conductors to arrest the T&D losses. Also State-of-Art IT
system involving SCADA, GIS and Automated Meter Reading system to improve
distribution efficiency, strengthen MIS and data collection and plug the system
deficiencies. Keeping in line with the improvement in efficiency and best possible
service to its consumers the Company has envisioned capacity augmentation.
Power transmission in India is typically associated with high distribution losses. The
distribution losses of NPCL at 8.53% were lower as compared to those of other large power
utilities in the country. The utility proposed to further reduce these transmission and distribution
losses, stop pilferage and increase the speed of commercialization of sale of power to all its
consumers. The company therefore decided to upgrade its distribution infrastructure, undertake
metering of unmetered consumers and demand side management measures to achieve significant
energy savings.
4.2.1 Operation
The Company executed an Agreement with the erstwhile U.P. State Electricity Board
(now U.P. Power Corporation Limited) in November 1993 for transfer of the supply
21
arrangements and sourcing of bulk power. In December 2008, the peak load served is 108.97
MVA as against 18 MVA in 1994-95, reflecting a steady increase in consumer demand.
The customer base has expanded from 4677 in 1993 to 44434 in December 2008. The
rural population provided with subsidized electricity consumes 15% of the energy demand and
has agriculture as the main source of income. Otherwise, the load profile is dominated by large
and heavy industries that constitute 65% of energy sale and contribute as much as 76% of the
Companys income. Urban, institutional and smaller industrial consumers account for the
balance business
The customer profile is as follows:
No. of Connections as on
Category of Consumers
15.12.93
31.12.08
38
274
201
946
3224
38443
Institutions
135
1188
1241
Commercial Establishments
1297
25
53
220
Temporary Supplies
1784
Total
4677
44434
Supply
22
In December 2008, sales turnover is Rs.168.77 cr., having moved up from Rs.19 cr. in
1994-95. As business expands, the growing need is to redefine the strategies and meet the
demand for service with in-built people and process capabilities.
The Company has been posting steady profits as permissible under the regulatory and
legal framework. Accumulated losses associated with initial operations have been wiped out and
the net worth at the end of 2003-04 stands at Rs.20.39 cr.
The cutting edge is provided by a lean organization with an employee headcount of 110.
Employee costs account for less than 1.5% of revenue. In terms of productivity rates, the number
of consumers serviced per employee stands at 402 and the revenue per employee at Rs.1.5 cr.
4.2.2 Services
The principal role of Noida Power is that of a service provider to support economic and
lifestyle activity. Building an efficient and reliable delivery system thus assumes top priority to
provide supply dependability. That Greater Noida is witness to the setting up of world-class
manufacturing by multinationals like Honda Cars, Yamaha Motors, New Holland Tractors, LG
Electronics, ST Microelectronics, India Exposition Mart, GSC Toughened Glass etc., and is also
home to an upwardly mobile residential population, underscores this point further.
The Company maintains and operates round-the-clock emergency services to deal with
supply-related complaints and undertake rectification works. Establishing a Call Centre that
provides 24-hour messaging services to consumers and improves trouble call monitoring has
reinforced the facilities. Complaint management is computerized, enabling call tracking from
start to finish and generation of exception reports.
Streamlined administrative procedures, on-time delivery of new supply and billing
consistency are the other facets of service that define the Company's inter-relationships with
customers. Organizational processes and hierarchical responsibilities are designed to meet the
demand for service in every aspect, including settlement of customer claims.
23
4.2.3 Initiative
It has been our aim to build our core competence around service differentiation and build
a competitive organization on the strength of cost and productive efficiency to ensure long-term
sustenance in an environment that places a premium on both service quality and cost
accountability.
Unleashing innovation and imagination is the key to business success in the competitive
marketplace. A first-time measure has been to introduce social intermediation in villages to
promote the concept of energy conservation and commercialization and facilitate metering of
domestic supplies against the promise of reliable and affordable electricity supply. Consumers
have responded by demonstrating commercial behaviour, resulting in avoidance of energy thefts
and improving the collection of user charges. In December 2008, 39% of the domestic consumer
population in villages is covered under metered supply. A unique intervention has been to
organize basic literacy classes for village women to reinforce the role of electricity in improving
lives and enhancing gender development. Success of the measures is seen from the comments
made by the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, who visited one such site and stated that seeing
first-hand the tangible quality of life improvements brought by reliable electricity was
memorable. Innovations in network and demand side engineering have paid rich dividends in
curtailing energy losses. A novel concept has been to introduce or agricultural connections and
facilitate energy-efficient pumping so as to conserve both energy and water and avoid
environmental degradation. In addition, introduction of for supply to households in villages has
reduced the propensity of energy thefts while optimizing network performance.
Process interventions in the areas of metering and billing have ensured that the loopholes
for revenue leakages are effectively plugged. The Company follows a fail-safe system of
electronic data transfer of meter readings to the bill-processing module, thereby dispensing with
24
manual entries. Daily collections are monitored on-line via the WAN and LAN infrastructure. In
December 2008, the energy losses stand at 8.53%, the lowest in the country, while the gross
collection rate is 96%.
IT is relied upon to handle the growing size of the business, while retaining the focus on
improving productivity, cycle times and customer relationships. Major initiatives include
integrating network, customer and asset management by leveraging geo-spatial information,
undertaking remote network sensing and operation in real time and improving daily work
management by automating the business processes of billing, collection and human resource
management on SAP platform and financial management on Oracle Apps. Of particular
significance is the GIS-based system, which allows users to undertake complex engineering
analyses, create network designs, generate Bill-of-Materials and manage Trouble Calls at the
Dispatching Centre. All new Sub-stations are presently left unmanned, with the SCADA
software providing the vehicle for remote network management in real time and dispensing with
the need for additional manpower.
Due consideration is necessary to develop the power infrastructure and meet the demand
escalation commensurate with the business growth. New avenues are being explored to procure
power from alternative sources and supplement the current intake arrangement so as to meet the
increase in load demand in the short and medium terms.
25
26
are conducted attracting students from all over the country. A Roorkee IIT has been
planned in the city that has been approved by HRD Ministry, Government of India.
Apart from educational institutes, various hospitals e.g. Sharda Group of Hospitals
(1200 bedded), Kailash Hospital (500 bedded) etc. have set up medical facilities at
large scale in Greater Noida.
The Company is envisaging steep growth in the system demand with the
commencement of the construction activities of Gautam budh Nagar University which
is supposed to be the biggest in the country and the Taj Expressway. The construction
of IT Park along proposed Taj Expressway is going on at a very faster pace.
Development of 400 acres as Night Safari, is also in the offing.
Keeping in view the above, the capital expenditure is, therefore, proposed to
ensure enhancement of the system capacity to meet load growth, improvement in the
system reliability and improvement in customer service linked with the Companys
vision of becoming the best electricity service provider in the country in terms of
consumer perception.
27
NPCL AT GLANCE
Area
335 Sq. Km
Population
2-Lakh
No. Of Substation
12
2383.40
T&D Losses
8.53%
336.35 MU
SUBSTATION NAME
1.
Surajpur
2.
Surajpur South
3.
Udyog Kendra
4.
Kasna
5.
EPIP
6.
Alpha
7.
Delta
28
8.
Girdharpur
9.
Sector 37
10.
Builders Area
11.
RC Green
12.
29
SWOT ANALYSIS
4.7.1 Strengths
1. Equipped with pool of well qualified learned and dedicated employees.
2. Excellent work Culture.
3. Management expertise is a valuable asset for the company and is its strength.
4. Proven expertise and technical capabilities in distribution sectors.
5. Customer oriented approach.
6. Dedication for the continuous quality improvement.
7. Driven by values and ethics.
4.7.2 Weakness
1. Relatively new and small organization.
2. Small Workforce.
4.7.3 Opportunities
1. Tremendous Pace of Power Sector Reforms prevailing in the country.
2. Increase in power demand globally.
3. Privatization of Electricity boards.
4.7.4 Threats
1. Poaching of talent by other companies.
2. Strong competitors.
30
EXECUTED PROJECT
5.1 Objective of the Project
1. The present project aims to understand the entire Procedure for Scheduling of Bilateral
Transaction as per CERC (Central Electricity Regulatory Commission) Regulation.
2. To determine various charges like open access charge, Energy charge.
3. To determine Landed Cost of power and developing a Power Procurement Plan for
NPCL.
31
process for scheduling of bilateral transaction for power procurement by distribution licensee and
help in determining the landed cost in procuring power from any generation company by
distribution licensee.
5.5 Conceptualization
NPCL procure power from different sources through open access mechanism .The
concept behind this project is to develop a power procurement plan in such a manner so as to
identify the optimum mix of injecting sources of power based on the landed cost of power for
different quantum, duration, period, states and region. We have utilized the concept of open
access, transmission losses and various regulations in place to arrive at the appropriate method to
calculate the landed cost of the power.
32
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
6.1 Procurement Period
1. Long-term procurement of electricity up to a period of 25 years.
2. Short term procurement of electricity up to a period of 1 year.
33
4. For the Applications (under Advance Scheduling/ First cum First Served basis) received till
17:30 Hrs of 14.06.2009, the short-term open access charges shall be as per the original CERC
(Open Access inter-State Transmission) Regulations, 2008. Similarly for Day-ahead scheduling,
the applications received till 15:00 HRs of 14.06.2009, the short-term open access charges shall
be as per the principal CERC (Open Access inter-State Transmission) Regulations, 2008. For
Applications (under Contingency category) received till 24:00 HRs of 14.06.2009, the shortterm open access charges shall be as per the principal CERC (Open Access inter-State
Transmission) Regulations, 2008.
5. For example:
An applicant X has submitted an Application on 13.06.2009 for Advance Scheduling of
Short-Term Open Access Bilateral Transaction for the month of August 2009 form 05.08.2009
to 25.08.2009. Another applicant Y has submitted an Application on 15.06.2009 for Advance
Scheduling of Short-Term Open Access Bilateral Transaction for the month of August 2009
form 01.08.2009 to 20.08.2009.The nodal RLDC shall consider both the Applications together.
In case of Applicant X, the short-term open access charges shall be as per CERC (Open
Access inter-State Transmission) Regulations, 2008 and in case of Applicant Y, as per the
Amendment Regulation, 2009.
6 .No retrospective adjustments for short-term open access charges shall be made for the already
approved short-term open access bilateral transactions.
34
point of injection, point of drawal, starting time block and date, ending time block and date, and
other information as per the enclosed format [FORMAT-I: Application for Scheduling].
3. An Application made for each Bilateral Transaction shall be accompanied by a non-refundable
fee of Rupees five thousand (Rs.5000/-) only as specified in the Regulations. Provided that the
fee for Bilateral Transaction on the day of the Application or on the day immediately following
the day of the Application may be deposited within three working days of submission of the
Application.
4. A copy of the Application shall be endorsed by the applicant to the following:
a) Each RLDC involved in the transaction.
b) Each SLDC involved in the transaction.
requirements under Regulation 8 have been duly complied with and submit the Application for
scheduling of Bilateral Transactions alongwith the duly notarized affidavit as per FORMAT
IIA. The Applicant shall serve a copy of the Affidavit alongwith the copy of the Application
being endorsed to the concerned SLDC.
36
(b) An Application for inter-State scheduling during the third month shall be made up to the five
(5) days prior to the close of the first month.
(c) An Application for inter-State scheduling in the second month shall be made up to the ten
(10) days prior to the close of the first month.
4. All the Applications received up to 17:30 Hrs on the last day as mentioned above shall be
taken up together for consideration. Applications received after prescribed time shall not be
considered.
5. While processing the Applications, the Nodal RLDC shall seek the concurrence of each of the
other RLDCs involved in the transaction by 12:00 Hrs. on next day of the applicable last date for
submission of Application.
6. The other RLDCs shall give their concurrence/denial latest by 20:00 Hrs on the same day on
which request for concurrence is sent by the nodal RLDC.
7. In case of perceived congestion in transmission corridor, nodal RLDC on next day (i.e. 2nd
day after the applicable last date for submission of Application) will inform the concerned
applicant(s)
as
per
enclosed
format
[FORMAT-IV:Congestion
Information-Advance
Scheduling] latest by 12:00 Hrs. By next day (i.e.; 3rd day after applicable last date for
submission of Application) latest by 11:00 Hrs, the Applicants must inform the nodal RLDC as
per enclosed format [FORMAT-V: Request for Revision of Schedule- Due to Congestion],
the reduced request for Scheduling during the period of Congestion or opt for Scheduling only
for the duration when no congestion is anticipated or opt for Scheduling through the alternate
route. In case of non-receipt of revised request in time, it shall be presumed that the Applicant is
not interested in revising it and nodal RLDC shall process the Application accordingly.
8. In case, the nodal RLDC still anticipates Congestion, it may invite electronic bids for advance
scheduling on 4th day after applicable last date for submission of Application.
37
9. The nodal RLDC shall convey its acceptance or otherwise to the Applicant in five days from
the last date of submission, as per enclosed format [FORMATVI:Acceptance for Scheduling].
In case, the nodal RLDC rejects an application ,it shall convey its reasons to the Applicant in
writing.
38
7. Bidding process and the Approval of the Schedules of the bidders shall be as per following:
a) The bid price shall be in addition to the Transmission Charges for Bilateral ransactions
as specified in the Para 16 of the Regulations.
b) The Bidder shall quote price in terms of Rs./MWh in multiples of 10.The minimum price
a bidder may quote is Rs. 10/MWh.
c) Approval of Short-Term Open Access for Advance Scheduling will be accorded in the
decreasing order of price quoted.
d) In case of equal price quoted by two or more successful bidders, the approval for
scheduling shall be made pro-rata to the scheduling request sought by them.
e) The Applicant, which gets approval for scheduling less than the scheduling request
sought by him, shall pay the charges quoted by him. The Applicant getting approval for
scheduling equal to the scheduling request sought by him shall pay the charges quoted by
the last Applicant getting approval of its full scheduling request.
39
a) Application received under First Come First Served category for Short-Term Open
Access shall be considered only when transactionsare commencing and terminating in the
same calendar month.
b) Application for scheduling a Bilateral Transaction which is commencing in the same
month in which Application is made, provided that such Application is received at least
four (4) days in advance from the date of commencement of the Bilateral Transaction. All
such Application shall be processed and decided within three days of their receipt.
c) Application received during the last ten (10) days of the first month, for scheduling of
transactions in the second month. These Applications would be considered after
completeing the process for Advance scheduling of Bilateral Transaction in the second
month. Accordingly, Applications received up to five (5) days prior to the end of the
month shall be processed only after completing the process for Advance Scheduling of
Bilateral Transactions for the second month.
3. All Applications received by the Nodal RLDC in a day up to 17:30 hrs shall be considered
together for processing and shall have same priority. Applications received by the nodal RLDC
after 17:30 hrs of a day shall be treated as having been received on next day.
4. Pro-rata scheduling acceptance shall be given in case scheduling requests of the Applicants is
for more than the margins available.
40
2. Applications for Day Ahead transactions shall be processed only after processing of the
Collective Transactions of the Power Exchange(s).
3. Pro-rata scheduling acceptance shall be given in case scheduling requests of the Applicants is
for more than the margins available.
41
2. The accepted schedules for Day-Ahead transactions and transactions in a Contingency shall
not be revised or cancelled.
3. The Applicant, who has requested for revision or cancellation of the accepted schedule as
above, shall pay the Transmission Charges and Operating Charges as per the originally accepted
schedule, if the period of revision or cancellation is upto two (2) days. If the period of revision or
cancellation exceeds two(2) days, the Transmission Charges and Operating Charges for the
period beyond two (2) days shall be payable as per the revised accepted schedule and for the
first two (2) days as per the original schedule.
For example: Say an Applicant has been scheduled for 10 days from 21st day of a month to
30th day of a month for 100 MW on round the clock basis (i.e. for 2400 MWh per day). If this
Applicant, on or before 18th day of that month, submits request for revision of schedule to
50MW on round the clock basis (i.e. 1200 MWh per day), the revised schedule will get
implemented from the beginning of the transactions (i.e. 21st day of the month). The
Applicant shall pay the Transmission Charges for 2400 MWh per day for the period from 21st
to 22nd day of the month. Whereas for the period from 23rd day to 30th day of the month,
Transmission Charges shall be payable for 1200MWh per day. However, if the Applicant
requests for such revision on 20th day of the month, his request will be implemented from
23rd day of the month. He shall pay Transmission charges for 2400MWh per day for 2 days
i.e. from 23rd to 24th day of the month and for the remaining period he shall pay the
Transmission Charges based on 1200MWh per day.
4. The margins becoming available as a result of such revision or cancellation shall be available
for scheduling to any other Applicant in accordance with relevant provisions of Regulations on
Open Access.
5. The short-term customers granted short-term open access prior to 15.06.2009 shall also be
eligible for Cancellation/downward revision of Schedule by giving two days notice and by
paying minimum two days transmission charges as per Regulation 15.The refund of transmission
42
charges shall be in accordance with the rate at which the transmission charges were paid by the
respective customer.
43
Operating Charges at the rate of Rs.2000/- per day or part of the day of each for the entire
period of Bilateral Transaction in respect of the following:
1. Each RLDC involved
2. Each SLDC involved
3. The Transmission charges for the use of the inter-State network shall be in Rs./MWh
depending upon the type of transaction and shall be payable by the short-term customer for the
energy approved at the point or points of injection.
The rate for transmission charges shall be as follows:
Type of Transaction
80
160
4. The Transmission charges for the use of the State network shall be in Rs/MWh, as determined
by the respective State Commission and the same shall be intimated to RLDCs by concerned
STU. Provided that in case the State Commission has not determined the Transmission charges,
the charges for use of the respective State network shall be payable at the rate of Rs.80/MWh for
the energy approved.
5. In case a State utility is the Buyer/Seller, the Operating Charges and the Transmission Charges
shall not include the charges for that State network and the Operating Charges for that State Load
Dispatch Center. A certificate in this regard from the concerned STU(s)/SLDCs shall be
submitted by the Applicant.
44
45
2. The Transmission Charges for use of State network and Operating Charges for SLDCs shall be
disbursed to the State Transmission Utility/SLDC concerned, after receiving the same from the
Applicants.
3. Transmission charges collected for use of the transmission system other than that of the State
network shall be disbursed by nodal RLDC to the RLDCs of the respective Region. The 25% of
the Transmission Charges collected for use of the transmission system other than the State
network shall be disbursed to CTU and balance 75% shall be disbursed to long-term customers
through the RLDC of the respective Region in accordance with Regulation 25.
4. In case of refunds arising due to curtailment/revision of transactions during the previous
month, the same shall also be disbursed to the concerned Applicants by 15th day of the current
month.
5. Nodal RLDC does not have any responsibility towards non-payment as well as dishonoring of
cheque(s) submitted by the Applicants. The amounts actually collected by RLDCs shall only be
disbursed.
46
a) The point of injection of a Seller to the injecting States periphery (control area
boundary) as confirmed by the concerned SLDC, and
b) From the periphery (control area boundary) of injecting State up to the periphery (control
area boundary) of the Drawee State as confirmed by the concerned RLDCs.
c) From the periphery (control area boundary) of the Drawee State to the point of drawal of
Buyer as confirmed by the concerned SLDC.
5. The Applications of the Applicants, who have not been accorded the Acceptance for
Scheduling of Bilateral Transactions, shall stand disposed off with suitable intimation to the
concerned Applicant(s).
6. All costs/expenses/charges associated with the Application, including Bank Draft, shall be
borne by the Applicant.
7. An incomplete/vague Application, and an Application not found to be in conformity with
these Procedures and Regulations, shall be summarily rejected.
8. None of charges payable by Applicant(s) and/or any other Entities involved in the transaction
shall be adjusted by them against any other payments/charges.
9. The Applicant shall abide by the provisions of The Electricity Act, 2003, Indian Electricity
Grid Code and CERC Regulations, as amended from time to time.
47
48
Step 9: Sending the Acceptance letter to the Resident Officer for taking consent from Chief
Engineer (Transmission), UPPCL
49
Demand Estimation
Demand estimates for FY 10 have been prepared by analyzing the past trends and employing
representative, case-specific models to make the future projections.
For preparing demand estimates for FY 10, it has been assumed that apart from present drawl
of 45 MVA from UPPCL the Company would procure additional power of 85 MW
approximately from the market through Open Access. The demand estimates for FY 10
are, therefore, prepared by extending the models deployed in preparing estimates for FY 09
and factoring in the assumption of availability of requisite power for higher specific
consumption.
YEAR
DEMAND (MVA)
2003
45
2004-05
52
2005-06
63
2006-07
72
2007-08
80
2008-09
100
2009-10
132
50
S No.
Trader/Supplier
Source
Contracted
Quantum
Transmission
Duration
at Route
Delivery pt.
UPPCL
UPPCL
43
At 132/33 surajpur
substation
WBSETCL
20
WB-ER-NR-UP
April 09 to
Sept 09
Adani
Ltd.
Enterprises MCPL
10
MP-WR-NR-UP
Madhya
June 09 to
Sept 09
Pradesh
Adani
Ltd.
Enterprises BILT,
HVPNL
Haryana-NR-UP
June 09 to
Sept 09
Haryana
51
Several correspondences were exchanged and meetings were held between the
Company and UPPCL. After much persuasion, the UPPCL agreed to allow open access to NPCL
for importing power from alternative sources. Apart from 45MVA supply from UPPCL, the
Company has been allowed a 20-25 MW transmission capacity at present under open access.
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the interest of paying consumers, demand growth
and restricted power of 45 MVA from UPPCL the Company is, therefore, procuring power
through trading arrangement from various traders on short term basis. To cater to increasing load
demand of the area, the Company Procure Power Through Open Access from generators and
traders
52
Availability of
Aug-08
Sep-08
Oct'08
Jan'09
FY
to
to
2009-
Dec'08
Mar'09
2010
Power in MW
No.
from
UPPCL
43
43
43
43
43
PTC
18
18
20
20
10
10
25
25
Not
Not
Not
Not
AEL(Adani
3
Enterprises
Ltd.)
TPTCL(Tata
4
Power Trading
Co. Ltd.)
RPTCL(RPG
5
Trading Co.
Ltd.)
RETL(Reliance
Trading Ltd.)
Available.
25
53
Type of Transaction
80
160
240
intervening regions
The intra-State entities shall additionally pay transmission charges for use of the State network as
determined by the respective State Commission:
Provided that in case the State Commission has not determined the transmission
charges, the same shall not be a ground for denial of open access and charges for use of
respective State network shall be payable for the energy approved at the rate of Rs. 30/ MWh.
Provided further that transmission charges for use of the State network shall be
intimated to the Regional Load Despatch Centre concerned for display on its web site:
Provided also that transmission charges shall not be revised with Retrospective effect.
54
55
No separate reactive energy charge accounting for open access transactions shall be carried out at
inter-State level:
Provided that the State Utility designated for the purpose shall be responsible for timely
payment of the States composite dues to the regional reactive charge account in accordance with
the provisions of the Grid Code.
The reactive energy drawals and injections by the intra-State entities shall be governed by the
regulations applicable within the State concerned.
56
5.79
60
/kWh
days
Days
Hours
kWh
Rate
Amount
60
24
5,760,000
579.000
33350400
MWs
Hrs.
Amount
NR
UPPCL
Total
Rs./MWh
Rs./MWh
Rs./MWh
Rs./MWh
131.60
80.00
50.00
261.60
1440
1506816
Days
Amount
WRLDC
NRLDC
UPPCL
Total
Charges/Day
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
2000
2000
2000
6000
Rs.
60
360000
4. Total Charges
Amount
1881816
57
Losses
RAJ
NR
UPPCL
Total
kWh
4.40%
3.50%
5.0%
12.4%
711,861
MWs
Days
Hours
kWh
Rate
Amount
3.505652
60
24
5,048,139
697.92
35232216
6.98
58
CASE STUDY
13.1 Objective
To study various Landed Cost at the same unit price of power for different Quantum.
Injecting state
Drawing state
1MW
5MW
10MW
15MW
20MW
ROUTE
25MW
5.832
5.596
5.567
5.557
5.552
5.549
J&K-NR-UP
Himachal Pradesh
5.832
5.596
5.567
5.557
5.552
5.549
HP-NR-UP
Punjab
6.194
5.944
5.913
5.902
5.897
5.894
PUNJAB-NR-UP
Delhi
5.921
5.683
5.653
5.643
5.638
5.635
DELHI-NR-UP
Haryana
6.135
5.894
5.864
5.854
5.849
5.846
HARYANA-NR-UP
Uttar Pradesh
5.397
5.315
5.304
5.301
5.299
5.298
UP
Uttaranchal
5.832
5.596
5.567
5.557
5.552
5.549
UTTARANCHAL-NR-UP
Rajasthan
5.835
5.594
5.57
5.56
5.557
5.552
RAJASTHAN-NR-UP
Chandigarh
5.832
5.596
5.567
5.557
5.552
5.549
CHANDIGARH-NR-UP
Gujarat
6.307
5.98
5.94
5.926
5.919
5.915
GUJARAT-WR-NR-UP
Madhya Pradesh
6.627
6.284
6.241
6.227
6.219
6.215
MP-WR-NR-UP
Maharashtra
6.649
6.306
6.264
6.249
6.242
6.238
MAHARASHTRA-WR-NR-UP
Bihar
6.236
5.913
5.873
5.859
5.853
5.849
BIHAR-ER-NR-UP
West Bengal
6.496
6.16
6.118
6.104
6.097
6.092
WB-ER-NR-UP
Jharkhand
6.236
5.913
5.873
5.859
5.853
5.849
JHARKHAND-ER-NR-UP
DVC
6.417
6.085
6.043
6.029
6.023
6.018
DVC-ER-NR-UP
Orissa
6.745
6.407
6.364
6.35
6.343
6.339
ORISSA-ER-NR-UP
Sikkim
6.236
5.913
5.873
5.859
5.853
5.849
SIKKIM-ER-NR-UP
Chhattisgarh
6.302
5.976
5.935
5.921
5.915
5.911
CHHATTISGARH-WR-NR-UP
Karnataka
6.897
6.465
6.411
6.393
6.384
6.378
KARNATAKA-SR-ER-NR-UP
Kerala
6.667
6.249
6.197
6.179
6.171
6.165
KERALA-SR-ER-NR-UP
59
QUANTUM
STATES
1MW
5MW
10MW
15MW
20MW
ROUTE
25MW
6.615
6.201
6.149
6.132
6.123
6.118
TN-SR-ER-NR-UP
Andhra Pradesh
6.935
6.503
6.449
6.431
6.422
6.416
AP-SR-ER-NR-UP
Mizoram
6.561
6.147
6.096
6.078
6.07
6.065
MIZORAM-NER-ER-NR-UP
Assam
6.561
6.147
6.096
6.078
6.07
6.065
ASSAM-NER-ER-NR-UP
Tripura
6.561
6.147
6.096
6.078
6.07
6.065
TRIPURA-NER-ER-NR-UP
Nagaland
6.561
6.147
6.096
6.078
6.07
6.065
NAGALAND-NER-ER-NR-UP
Arunachal Pradesh
6.561
6.147
6.096
6.078
6.07
6.065
ARUNACHAL P -NER-ERNR-UP
Manipur
6.561
6.147
6.096
6.078
6.07
6.065
MANIPUR-NER-ER-NR-UP
Meghalaya
6.561
6.147
6.096
6.078
6.07
6.065
MEGHALAYA-NER-ER-NRUP
13.3 Assumptions
1. QUANTUM AT
INJECTING POINT
2. SUPPLY DURATION
00:00 Hrs.-24.00Hrs.
Rs 5/KWh
4. NO. OF DAYS
30 Days
13.4 Analysis
The Analysis of the Procurement of Power is based on the following assumptions:1. The Unit cost of Power is Rs. 5/KWh.
2. Duration of Power supply is 24 Hours.
3. Period of Procurement of Power is 30 days.
On the careful perusal of the per unit landed cost of power in respect of different Region such as
Northern, Western, Southern, Eastern and North-Eastern are listed below based on increasing
order of Price.
60
NORTHERN REGION
S No.
1 MW
Priority
States
5.397
UP
5.832
5.835
Rajasthan
5.921
Delhi
6.135
Haryana
6.194
Punjab
WESTERN REGION
S No.
1 MW
Priority
States
6.236
Chhattisgarh
6.307
Gujarat
6.627
MP
6.649
Maharashtra
EASTERN REGION
S No.
1 MW
Priority
States
6.236
6.417
DVC
6.496
WB
6.745
Orissa
61
S No.
1 MW
Priority
States
6.615
TN
6.667
Kerala
6.897
Karnataka
6.935
AP
1 MW
Priority
States
6.685
TN
6.737
Kerala
6.970
Karnataka
AP
S No.
1 MW
Priority
6.561
States
Mizoram, Assam, Tripura, Nagaland, Arunachal
Pradesh, Manipur and Meghalaya
62
13.5 Conclusion
On the basis of Analysis involved different combinations and permutations resulted into various
inferences, which lead to the following conclusions.
1. The power is available at different Regions like Northern, Western, Eastern, Southern and
North-Eastern region at varied rates through different routes.
2. The power procurement per unit from Northern Region is cheapest in comparison to all other
regions.
3. The power procurement from Uttar Pradesh in Northern region is cheapest in comparison to
all states from different regions.
4. The power procurement from Southern Region with South-East & Northern route is cheaper
in comparison to South, West & Northern Route.
5. The power procurement from Eastern Region is the second cheapest in comparison to other
regions.
6.
The power procurement from Southern Region routed through South, West & Northern
route is the costliest.
7. All the states of North-Eastern region are having the same rate per unit cost with moderate
per unit cost of Rs.6.561/MW.
8. Four-states of Northern Region namely J& K, Himachal Pradesh, Uttaranchal & Chandigarh
are 2nd cheapest option with same rate to procure the power.
9. The power procurement from Andhra Pradesh in Southern Region routed from South-West &
North is the costliest affair is comparison to all other options.
10. The cost of power per unit gets reduced or cheaper with the increase in quantum of power
procured. Therefore to have power at cheaper rate the quantum of power procured should be
more.
63
14. Recommendations
1. The Power should be booked on firm basis.
2. Advance booking should be preferred over Day Ahead Booking.
3. Long Term Agreements should be entered into directly with the generators rather than through
traders, which would help in saving the extra cost per unit equivalent to the trading margin.
4. Long Term Arrangement should be preferred over short term arrangement
15. Limitations
Every study suffers from certain Limitation and this is no exception. But in spite of that, best
effort has been put to understand the Power Procurement Plan for NPCL. There is always a
difference between a theoretical study and a practical knowledge, and I consider it as the main
limitation and other limitation are as follows:
(1) Transmission Constraints
(2) Non Concurrence from SLDC
(3) Techno Commercials issues
(4) Political issues
(5) Regional transmission Losses Values change from week to week
64
ANNEXURES
65
STATES
Transmission charge
80
Himachal Pradesh
80
Punjab
80
Delhi
57
Haryana
190
Uttar Pradesh
80
Uttaranchal
80
Rajasthan
32.9
Chandigarh
80
DVC
80
Gujarat
34
Madhya Pradesh
80
Maharashtra
51.5
Bihar
80
West Bengal
80
Jharkhand
80
Orissa
210
Sikkim
80
Chhattisgarh
80
Karnataka
80
Kerala
80
Tamil Naidu
28.97
Andhra Pradesh
53.3
Mizoram
Assam
Tripura
Nagaland
Arunachal Pradesh
Manipur
Meghalaya
66
LOSS%
NR
3.0
ER
WR
3.5
6.0
SR
3.33
NER
4.0
LOSS%
0
0.00
5.85
1.50
2.10
5.00
0
4.40
0
1.95
4.10
4.70
4.85
4.50
0
3.10
0
4.50
0
5.00
4.06
0.75
1.75
4.16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
67
68
Phone Nos. & Fax Nos. of RLDCs, SLDCs and NPCL LDC
1. NRLDC
Phone Nos.: 011-26519406 (Control Room), 011-26968280 (Commercial)
Fax Nos. : 011-26852747 (Control Room)
2. UP SLDC, Lucknow
Phone Nos.: 0522-2287851 (Control Room)
Fax Nos. : 0522-2287882 (Control Room)
3. Modipuram
Phone Nos.: 0121-2956098 (Control Room)
4. WRLDC
Phone Nos.: 022-28397634 (Control Room)
5. NPCL
Phone Nos.: 9891701259, 9891701260
Fax Nos. : 0120-2326448 (CEO fax m/c), 0120-2326972 (on Computer)
69
Dear Sir,
Sub: Offer for supply of power to NPCL
With reference to your Letter No. PTC/MTFG/NPCL/5005 dated 05.08.2008 and the subsequent
discussion with you; we are pleased to accept your offer for supply of power subject to the
following terms and conditions:
The quantum of firm power to be supplied round-the-clock (between 0.00 hr & 24.00 hr) daily
to Noida Power Company Limited would be 5 MW. The power will be delivered from 1st
September 2008 up to 31st December 2008.
The price at which the above power to be supplied at the delivery point being at 66kV bus at
switchyard of hydro plant at Uttarakhand (NR) would be Rs. 6.54 per KWh.
The above price shall be inclusive of all applicable taxes, duties access, Open Access (up to the
delivery point as above) and trading margin.
Open access charges and transmission losses of STUs & CTUs beyond the delivery point will
be to NPCLs account.
M/s PTC India Ltd. shall be responsible for facilitating Open Access for wheeling the requisite
quantum of power as above from the delivery point to NPCLs offtake point at 132/33 kV
Surajpur / RC Green Sub-station, Greater Noida.
All other terms and conditions of your above offer are acceptable.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
For Noida Power Company Limited
S. Ganguly
Senior Manager
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
REFRENCES
WEBSITES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
www.noidapower.com
www.uppcl.org
www.powermin.nic.in
www.cercind.org
www.nrldc.org
www.srldc.org
www.wrldc.org
www.erldc.org
www.nerldc.org
www.cea.nic.in
www.aptranscorp.com
www.mppkvvcl.nic.in
www.msebindia.com
http://orissagov.nic.in
www.psebindia.org
www.rajenergy.com/transco.htm
sikkimpower.nic.in
www.tneb.in
BOOKS
Power Line
Ieema
79