Sunteți pe pagina 1din 51

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Sensex 40,000

Stock # 1

Bharat Forge Ltd

11

Stock # 2

TCS Ltd

20

Stock # 3

HDFC Bank Ltd

29

Stock # 4

Larsen & Toubro Ltd

38

Disclosures under SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations

48

Sensex 40,000

|2

Sensex 40,000
4 Stocks to Profit from the Coming Stock Market Wave
Many shall be restored that now are fallen and many shall fall that now are in honor.

Benjamin Graham put these words on the first page of Security Analysis. And in doing
so, gave the most prominent position in his seminal text to the idea that stocks
invariably go through cyclical ups and downs.
Take Warren Buffett for example.
There is no doubting Buffetts skills in value investing. But he was able to put his skills
to the best use only during the rare times - when the odds of outperforming were
heavily stacked in his favour. In other words, buying solid companies when they were
trading at historical lows paid off brilliantly for years to come. Whether it was while
buying Coke or American Express, Buffett relied not just on his skills but also on the
turn of fortunes for the companies.
Its not all about valuations
Now, most investors mistake the association of reversion to the mean concept with
valuations alone.
Its true that buying stocks at historically low valuations gives you a meaningful safety
net. So you can only expect valuations to get better from those levels.
But the earnings cycle of companies can be a big tailwind to the recovery in valuations.

Sensex 40,000

|3

More importantly, the opportunities to bet big on a reversal in valuations could be


rare in the case of most sound businesses. But the number of times you could bet on
a reversal in earnings could be far higher.
Take a look at the earnings growth pattern of BSE 200 companies over past 20 years.
The average year on year earnings (profit) growth during this period has been about
17.7%. But there have been several instances when the profit growth has been below
average and a reversion to the mean was a given.
Long term profit growth of the best Indian business
Profit growth (% YoY, BSE 200)
60
50
40
30

Avg YoY Profit growth 17.7%

20
10
0
1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

2012

2015

Source: Ace Equity

As against this, a broad call on reversion in valuations could have been taken only
during market crashes.

Sensex 40,000

|4

Long term price to earnings multiple of the best Indian business


P/E multiple (x, BSE 200)
30
25
20
15

Avg PE 18.3x

10
5
Apr-06

Apr-09

Apr-12

Apr-15

Source: Ace Equity

Yet another way to look at it is to think of it as the contribution of corporate


profitability to the economy as a whole.
If the corporate profit to GDP number is too low, then most businesses will be
unviable. Businesses will shut down, competition will reduce, and profitability will
start to rise.
What if the number is too high? The reverse will happen. Competition will come in to
earn the extra profits, capacities will go up, there will be a fight for market share, and
profitability will now start to fall.
And don't forget the public policy angle. If investors consume an ever-growing portion
of the GDP pie, some other group will have to settle for a smaller portion.
In short, enough corrective measures are in place to ensure that corporate
profitability stays neither too low nor too high. There is always a reversion to the
mean.
Whats the situation currently?
Corporate profitability in India today is at historical lows. Profits as a share of GDP are
Sensex 40,000

|5

currently below 4% compared to the long term average of about 6.2%. At its peak, the
number has been over 8%!
We have had virtually no corporate profit growth in the past two years. Therefore it is
reasonable to assume that even a slight up move in GDP growth and normalization
in profit margins will stoke significant earnings growth for the best businesses.
Plus, the capacity utilization levels have been low. Corporates have taken significant
cost-cutting and restructuring measures over the past few years. Interest costs are
unlikely to move significantly higher. And there is significant operating leverage in the
system.
The latest RBI data shows that capacity utilisation levels have moved up a notch.
However, any increases in utilisation levels need to be consistent for the volume
growth to reflect in earnings. And once the utilisation levels get close to where they
were in 2013, companies will enjoy higher pricing power in addition to volume growth.
The triggers that could lead to a sharp earnings recovery are therefore all in place.
Pricing power in the offing with better utilization rates

Capacity utilization (%)


80
78
76
74

72.5

72
70
3QFY13 1QFY14 3QFY14 1QFY15 3QFY15 1QFY16 3QFY16
Source: RBI

The math below will give you a good idea of what I am talking about.
If Sensex earnings per share were to grow at the historical rate of 15% and if profit
margins were to rise to the last 10-year average of 13.5% from the current 12.2%, an
EPS of Rs 100 can become Rs 168 by FY18, a nearly 70% jump. Therefore, if Sensex
Sensex 40,000

|6

follows suit, the index too can go up by as much as 70%, assuming the Sensex PE
multiple remains at the current level of around 19x.
An EPS of Rs 100 three years hence would be........

Sensex
Profit margin

3 year Earnings CAGR


5%

10%

15%

20%

12.2%

116

133

152

173

12.8%

121

140

160

181

13.2%

125

144

165

187

13.5%

128

147

168

191

Source: Equitymaster

The earnings wave is not restricted to the 30 Sensex companies alone!


Plenty of blue-chip stocks outside of the Sensex can fetch earnings growth in excess
of 15% per year over the next three years.
But if earnings were to grow at 15%, and if profit margins were to rise to their
ten-year average of 11% from the current 9.6%, an EPS of Rs 100 can become Rs
174 by FY19. Which means an upside of 74%.
And at least for few stocks, if the earnings growth goes to 20%, the earnings could
easily double from the current levels.

Sensex 40,000

|7

An EPS of Rs 100 three years hence would be........

BSE 100

3 year Earnings CAGR

Profit margin

15%

20%

25%

30%

9.6%

152

173

195

220

10.8%

171

194

220

247

11.0%

174

198

224

252

12.7%

201

229

258

291

Source: Equitymaster

So what do we conclude?
The fact that profitability of Indian companies will reverse to mean over a period of
two to three years is a given. As shown in the data earlier, there is a strong possibility
of the Sensex earnings growing by as much as 70% over the next three years. Now
taking that into account if the Sensex is valued even at its long term average price to
earnings multiple of 18x, you could see the Sensex touching nothing less than the
40,000 mark in three years.
The math is based on Sensex actual earnings for FY16 and does not take into account
any significant changes to macro-economic variables.
With 70% earnings growthwhere would Sensex be?

Earnings growth
30%

50%

70%

20,998

24,228

27,458

32,304

15

26,247

30,285

34,323

40,380

18

31,496

36,342

41,188

48,456

20

34,996

40,380

45,764

53,840

22

38,496

44,418

50,340

59,224

PE Multiple

12

100%

Source: Equitymaster

Sensex 40,000

|8

How will you benefit from Sensex 40,000?


If you are still wondering whether investing in stocks based on the possibility of
turnaround in corporate profitability, take a look at this chart.
While the earnings per share of Sensex has grown by 198% in the last eleven financial
years, the market capitalization of the benchmark index has grown by 458% during
this period. Therefore the odds of profiting from a surge in corporate profitability over
a period of time, are heavily stacked in your favour even if the markets are starting
from a fair valuation level.

Impact of Earnings growth on Shareholder Wealth


Growth in Earnings Vs Market cap
CAGR 14%

1,600

48,000

Sensex EPS (LHS)

1,200

Sensex Mkt cap (Rs billion)

CAGR 11%

36,000

800
24,000

400
0

12,000
FY06FY07FY08FY09FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
Source: Ace Equity, Equitymaster

Of course, you need to act now.


The time to invest in the best businesses before the earnings surge becomes evident
in financial performance quarter after quarter, will give you an edge. You may be able
to invest in the creamiest of the business before their valuations get beyond your
reach.
Make no mistake. Just like stock prices, corporate profits are never linear. There will
Sensex 40,000

|9

be temporary hiccups on the way up. But the most robust businesses and safest
stocks will outshine their past track record in the years to come.
To assist you in equipping your portfolio with companies that are certain to ride this
earnings wave, we have laid out four compelling stock ideas.
These are businesses that not only offer comfort in terms of fundamentals and
management quality, but are also the ones that we believe will capture the earnings
growth opportunity faster than others. The upside in their earnings potential is so
visible that most macro headwinds will hardly impact them. At the suggested buy
prices, these stocks are a must have in your portfolio in the journey to Sensex 40,000.
And as we come across more that qualify this criteria, rest assured, we will be the first
ones to alert you!
Happy investing!

Sensex 40,000

| 10

Stock # 1

Bharat Forge Ltd


A conscious strategy to focus on superior quality products and strong client
relationships

The fortunes of auto ancillary business are closely linked to that of the automobile
industry. When the economy is performing well, naturally auto companies benefit as
higher incomes lead to more vehicle purchases by consumers. This then has a
favourable impact on auto ancillaries as well. But when the economy slows down, the
scenario is just the opposite. Demand for automobiles slump and margins come
under pressure for auto manufacturers. In such a scenario, auto ancillary companies
feel the pressure as well and are unable to have much bargaining power given that
OEMs become highly resistant to any price increases.
That is why it is important for auto ancillary companies to have the competitive edge
in the area that they cater to. This atleast ensures that there is not much dent to their
market shares when the times are tough.
And we feel that Bharat Forge does have that kind of a strong competitive advantage.
Part of the Pune-based Kalyani Group, Bharat Forge has emerged as the world's
leading chassis component manufacturer. The company has grown rapidly through
a series of acquisitions and joint ventures, and has manufacturing facilities spread
across India, Germany, Sweden, and France.
The company manufactures unbranded, commoditised ancillary products for original
equipment manufacturers (OEM) in the auto space. Yes, it's a boring business. But let
us tell you, Bharat Forge is not your run-of-the-mill component manufacturer.
The company's management has differentiated itself by persistently focusing on
delivering quality and value-added products to its customers. Its scale and reach has
empowered it with solid project execution capabilities. In both the domestic and the
international markets, Bharat Forge boasts of strong clientele, the likes of which
include Tata Motors, Ashok Leyland, Eicher Motors, Mahindra & Mahindra, Maruti

Sensex 40,000

| 11

Suzuki, Volvo, Caterpillar, Toyota, Renault, and Daimler Chrysler, to name a few. These
are relationships built over the years. This indicates that the company's customers
prefer Bharat Forge and its superior offerings over other players. That's the
company's competitive edge.
We also like that the company hasn't confined itself to being a leading manufacturer
of chassis components for the auto industry. The company also manufactures
specialised components for the aerospace, power, energy, oil and gas, rail and
marine, mining and construction equipment, and other industries. The company has
made a conscious effort to diversify across sectors and geographies to make the
business model more resilient.
How many ancillary component manufacturers do you know that boast of average
operating margins of 25% over a ten-year period? Through its three-pronged strategy
of aggressive export thrust, increasing the share of value added products, and
reducing production costs through automation and technology, the company's
management has carved out a durable, profitable business model with solid longterm fundamentals.
On the flip side, there are some medium-term growth challenges. The financial year
2015-16 was a tough period as both its business segments - auto and industrial faced headwinds. The crash in commodities was primarily responsible for the dip in
the industrial business.
However, going forward, the industrial business is expected to revive on the back of
orders from the government's Make in India initiative. The company has identified
four areas of focus - railways, power, mining, and defence. Abroad, the company is
catering to aerospace, and this too is expected to be an important growth driver.
In our view, Bharat Forge's leadership position in the chassis component market,
long-standing relationships with marquee clientele, superior product quality, a
proven long-term track record of healthy profitability makes it a tough business that
has the capability to sail through tough times.
Given such a strong business model and sound management, we believe that Bharat
Forge should form part of an investors portfolio. Hence, we recommend investors to
buy the stock of Bharat Forge at Rs 732 or lower.

Sensex 40,000

| 12

Risk Analysis
In order to further improve our risk analysis of companies we have come out with a
revised Equitymaster Risk Matrix (ERMTM). The ERMTM is broken down in to 4 sub
heads namely industry risk, performance risk, management risk and balance sheet
risk.

Regulatory risk: Some businesses are subject to regulations by external


government agencies. These companies are subject to regulatory risk since
they do not have the liberty to operate in a free environment. Excessive
regulations can create bureaucratic hassles and impede growth. Thus, higher
the regulation, higher is the risk for any business. As such there are no
regulations for the auto ancillaries industry. Based on these parameters, we
assign a risk rating of 6 to the stock.

Cyclicality risk: An industry cycle is characterized by an upturn as well as


downturn. Businesses whose fortunes typically swing with industry cycles are
known as cyclical businesses. Cyclical businesses do well during an industry
upturn and vice versa. On the other hand, there are some businesses based
on consumption stories that are non-cyclical. These businesses are immune
to industry cycle changes and have less risk. In short, if the business is cyclical
higher is the risk. The fate of the auto ancillaries industry depends a lot on the
performance of the auto sector. And the auto industry is highly cyclical in
nature and is closely linked to GDP growth as well as disposable incomes of
people. Based on this, we assign a high score of 2.

Competition risk: Every industry is characterized by competition. However,


some industries where entry and exit barriers are typically low have higher
competition risk. Low barriers means more players can enter into the industry
there by intensifying competition. Low product differentiation also intensifies
competition risk. Competition in the sector has intensified in the past and is
expected to continue going forward too. This will not only be from existing
players but new players entering the market as well. We thus assign a score of

Sensex 40,000

| 13

4 to the stock on this parameter.

Sales growth: Over the eight-year period (actual history of past 5 years and
explicit forecast for the next 3 years) we expect sales CAGR of 12%. We assign
a high risk rating of 4 to the stock on this parameter.

Net profit growth: Over the eight-year period (actual history of past 5 years
and explicit forecast for the next 3 years) we expect net profit CAGR of 19.7%.
We assign a medium risk rating of 6 to the stock on this parameter.

Operating margins: Operating margin is a measurement of what proportion


of a company's revenue is left over after paying for variable costs of
production such as raw materials, wages, and sales and marketing costs. A
healthy operating margin is required for a company to be able to pay for its
fixed costs, such as interest on debt. The higher the margin, the better it is for
the company as it indicates its operating efficiency. The average operating
margins over the 8-year period (actual history of past 5 years and explicit
forecast for the next 3 years) stand at 27.8%, which is healthy. We assign a
score of 7.

Net margins: Net margin is a measurement of what proportion of a


company's revenue is left over after paying for all the variable and fixed costs
inclusive of interest and depreciation charges. Net margin is the final measure
of profitability. It reflects the total profits the company takes home. Higher the
margin, better it is for the company as it indicates better pricing power and
effective cost management. The average net margins over the 8-year period
(actual history of past 5 years and explicit forecast for the next 3 years) stand
at 14.7%. We assign a score of 6.

Return on net worth (RoNW): RoNW is an important tool to assess a


company's potential to be a quality investment by determining how well the
management is able to allocate capital into its operations for future growth. A
RoNW of above 15% is considered decent for companies that are in an
expansionary phase. The average RoNW over the 8-year period (actual history
of past 5 years and explicit forecast for the next 3 years) stands at 13.3% which

Sensex 40,000

| 14

is on the lower side. We assign a score of 6.

Earnings quality: This measure helps us assess the quality of earnings


reported by the company. For instance, some companies may follow
aggressive accounting practices and recognize revenues earlier than
warranted. Earlier recognition of revenues boosts profits. However, at the
same time they do not generate sufficient operating cash flow (OCF). This
signifies debtors are not liquidated on time as sales were booked in advance.
Such companies face working capital issues and their quality of earnings is
poor. We assess earnings quality by dividing operating cash flow to net profits.
Higher the ratio better is the quality of earnings. The average OCF/net profit
ratio over the 8-year period (actual history of past 5 years and explicit forecast
for the next 3 years) stands at 1.4 which is robust. We assign a score of 8.

Transparency: Transparency is the key to any business. Transparency can be


gauged by assessing the past dealings of the company with various stake
holders be it the customers, suppliers, distributors or shareholders. The
easiest way to gauge the same is checking the level of disclosures in the
company's quarterly financial updates and communication with minority
shareholders. Most importantly, the management's willingness to explain its
stance if there is a negative development in the company or stock shows its
forthrightness. Transparent managements would get a higher rating. We have
found that Bharat Forge is quite transparent and thus we assign a rating of 7.

Capital allocation: Apart from honesty, capital allocation skills are equally
important in assessing management quality. By capital allocation we mean
how the management chooses to deploy capital in the business or across
businesses. Managements that have in the past destroyed shareholder wealth
by diversifying in unrelated, unviable businesses or make expensive
acquisitions would rank low on this parameter. Further managements that
focus on capital intensive growth at the cost of profitability would also fetch a
low rating. The management of Bharat Forge has been reasonably successful
in capital allocation. We assign a score of 7 to Bharat Forge on this parameter.

Promoter pledging: Promoters typically pledge their shares to take a loan


which is generally infused in the company. This exercise is generally resorted

Sensex 40,000

| 15

to when all other sources of external liquidity dry out. The risk with this
strategy arises when share price falls. This triggers margin calls. If
management is unable to provide some sort of a collateral to the lending party
from whom the money is borrowed that party may sell the shares to recover
its money. This accentuates the share price fall. Hence, higher the promoter
pledging higher is the risk. Since none of the promoters' equity have been
pledged we assign the score of 10.

Debt to equity ratio: A highly leveraged business is the first to get hit during
times of economic downturn, as companies have to consistently pay interest
costs, despite lower profitability. We believe that a debt to equity ratio of
greater than 1 is a high-risk proposition. The average D/E ratio over the 8-year
period (actual history of past 5 years and explicit forecast for the next 3 years)
has been 0.5x. We assign a score of 8.

Interest coverage ratio: It is used to determine how comfortably a company


is placed in terms of payment of interest on outstanding debt. The interest
coverage ratio is calculated by dividing a company's earnings before interest
and taxes (EBIT) by its interest expense for a given period. The lower the ratio,
the greater are the risks. The interest coverage ratio for Bharat Forge (actual
history of past 5 years and explicit forecast for the next 3 years) stands at 14.9,
which is healthy. Hence, we assign a score of 8.
It may be noted that leverage, return generating capability, earnings quality
and management risk get the highest weight in our matrix. Hence, scores
assigned to these factors influence the overall score.

Considering the above analysis, the total ranking assigned to the company is 89
that, on a weighted basis, stands at 6.8. This makes the stock a medium-risk
investment from a long-term perspective.

Sensex 40,000

| 16

ERMTM
Riskiness (A)

Company Specific Parameters

High - Medium - Low

Points
1 2

Industry risk

Weightage (B) Weighted (A*B)

9 10

Regulatory risk $

5.0%

0.3

Cyclicality risk $

5.0%

0.1

Competition risk $

5.0%

0.2

Sales growth

5.0%

0.2

Net profit growth

5.0%

0.3

Operating margins

5.0%

0.4

Net margins

5.0%

0.3

RoIC / RoNW

10.0%

0.6

Earnings Quality (OCF/PAT)

10.0%

0.8

10.0%

0.7

Capital allocation $

10.0%

0.7

Promoter pledging $

10

10.0%

1.0

10.0%

0.8

Interest coverage ratio

5.0%

0.4

Final Rating#

89

Performance risk

Management risk
Transparency $

Balance Sheet risk


Debt to equity ratio

6.8

*Excluding extraordinary gains. For qualitative factors, denoted by $ sign, lower the risk, higher the
rating. For any risk parameter if the score is below or equal to 4 it indicates high risk. The risk score of
these parameters is highlighted in red color. For risk parameters where the score is above 4 riskiness is
low. The risk score of such parameters is highlighted in grey.

Sensex 40,000

| 17

Financials at a glance
Standalone (Rs m)

FY12

FY13

FY14

FY15

FY16UA

Sales

36,860

31,512

33,993

45,481

43,054

Sales growth (%)

28.9%

-14.5%

7.9%

33.8%

-5.3%

Operating profit

9,168

7,156

8,637

13,300

12,830

Operating profit margin (%)

24.9%

22.7%

25.4%

29.2%

29.8%

Net profit

3,621

3,056

3,999

7,190

7,011

Net profit margin (%)

9.8%

9.7%

11.8%

15.8%

16.3%

Current assets

23,581

15,617

20,229

29,003

22,217

Fixed assets

20,853

22,216

21,568

21,638

24,395

Investments

8,848

9,306

13,409

11,038

14,298

Other assets

4,287

1,778

2,079

2,768

Total Assets

53,282

51,427

56,985

63,758

63,678

Current liabilities

13,734

11,731

13,283

10,309

10,024

Net worth

21,431

23,111

26,933

34,957

36,405

Loans

16,845

14,880

14,670

16,525

14,615

Other liabilities

1,272

1,705

2,099

1,968

2,635

Total liabilities

53,282

51,427

56,985

63,758

63,678

Balance Sheet

Sensex 40,000

| 18

Market Data
732

Price on 16th June 2016 (Rs)

1,292 / 705

52-week High/Low (Rs)

BHARATFORG

NSE Symbol

500493

BSE Code

232.9

No. of shares (m)


Face value (Rs)

2.0

FY16 dividend/share (Rs)

7.5

Free float (%)

53.3

Market cap (Rs m)

170,483

Avg. 52-week liquidity (No. of shares) (BSE+NSE combined)

922,050

Price to sales* (times)

4.0

Price to earnings* (times)

24.1

*Based on trailing 12-month numbers

Annexure for Bharat Forge Ltd: Shareholding (%, Mar-16)


Category

(%)

Promoters

46.7

Banks, MFs and FIs

16.6

Other institutions

15.9

Indian public

11.7

Others

9.0

Total

Sensex 40,000

100.0

| 19

Stock # 2

TCS Ltd
The Only Indian Software Company That Is Truly Responding To The Digital
Revolution.

The long-term earnings growth driver for Indian software firms is the offshoring
opportunity. It is a proven and predictable business model. The opportunity remains
large in our rapidly changing world. This is true despite Indian IT firms having grabbed
about 55% of the software offshoring market already.
To thrive in the information age, it is important for global firms to not only keep their
costs low. They also have to reach out to their customers faster and more effectively.
A company with a good software back-bone will be able to respond to changes in the
marketplace much faster than its competitors.
Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) has proven to be the software partner of choice of
large multi-nationals. During the last decade, TCS has quietly gone from strength to
strength. The companys revenues and profits have both grown by 23.4% CAGR in the
last ten years. During this time, operating margins too have remained strong
averaging 28.1%. A potent combination of operational flexibility, de-centralised
operations, and excellent service quality is responsible for this performance.
The speed and skill of its service delivery has won TCS immense client loyalty and
respect around the world. The management has converted this goodwill into very
sticky long-term client relationships, by transforming itself from a software partner
into a business partner. Thus, the management has successfully established a strong
moat around the business via high switching cost and the companys brand name.
The company is fortunate to have a very experienced and capable team at the helm
of affairs. The senior management is known for anticipating trends in the industry
well in advance and responding proactively. This visionary and ethical team has led
TCS through thick and thin. Their ability to deploy cash at high rates of return over
the years, across various geographies, is truly commendable.

Sensex 40,000

| 20

They have also managed to attract and retain the best talent in the industry over the
years. This is crucial in an industry where success depends on the skill and depth of a
companys human resources.
Thankfully, the management is not resting on its laurels. True to form, they
anticipated the digital revolution. To prepare for the same, they invested in these new
technologies over the last two years. These investments are now yielding results. The
companys order book reached an all-time high recently. This on the back of high
growth in the digital space. Revenues from these newer services already contributes
about 15.5% of the companys topline. This trend bodes well for the future.
We believe TCS can sustain this business momentum. The company has proven its
ability to invest cash profitably in high growth markets across the world. The
management's focus on non-linear growth bodes well for the future. In this era where
software firms are moving away from linear (i.e. employee based growth), we believe
TCS is in the best position among large Indian IT firms to benefit from the same.
Considering company s growth prospects, we recommend investors to Buy stock of
TCS at Rs 2,556 or lower.

Sensex 40,000

| 21

Risk Analysis
The ERMTM is broken down in to 4 sub heads namely industry risk, performance risk,
management risk and balance sheet risk. (For details please refer to the ERMTM at the
end of the report).

Regulatory Risk: Some businesses are subject to regulations by external


government agencies. These businesses are subject to regulatory risk since
they do not have the liberty to operate in a free environment. Excessive
regulations can create bureaucratic hassles and impede growth. Thus, higher
the regulation, higher is the risk of volatility in profit and growth for any
business. Though the regulatory framework in India is conducive for IT
companies, however the companies are subject to the regulations in their
client countries. As seen in recent times, most of the changes in regulations in
the client countries (e.g. Visa regulations etc) have had an impact on the Indian
IT companies. As a result, we have assigned a rating of 4 to the company.

Cyclicality Risk: A business cycle is characterized by an upturn as well as


downturn. Businesses whose fortunes typically swing with industry cycles are
known as cyclical businesses. Cyclical businesses do well during an industry
upturn and vice versa. On the other hand, there are some businesses that are
not very cyclical. These businesses are more immune to changes in industry
cycles in the sector and have less risk. In short, if the business is cyclical higher
is the risk. In short, if the business is cyclical, the risk is higher. Given that the
IT sector is not a cyclical business, we assign a low risk score of 8 to the
company on this parameter.

Competition Risk: Every industry is characterized by competition. However,


some industries where entry and exit barriers are typically low have higher
competition risk. Low barriers means more players can enter into the industry
there by intensifying competition. The competition in the IT services sector is
intense and global in nature. Therefore, we assign a rating of 2 to the
company.

Sales Growth: Over the 8 year period (actual history of past 4 years and
explicit forecast for the next 4 years), the growth is estimated at a CAGR of
20.7%. We assign a risk rating of 6 to the stock on this parameter.

Sensex 40,000

| 22

Net Profit Growth: Over the 8 year period (actual history of past 4 years and
explicit forecast for the next 4 years), the growth is estimated at a CAGR of
20.8%. We assign a risk rating of 6 to the stock on this parameter.

Operating Margins: Operating margin is a measurement of what proportion


of a company's revenue is left over after paying for variable costs of
production such as raw materials, wages, and sales and marketing costs. A
healthy operating margin is required for a company to be able to pay for its
fixed costs, such as interest on debt. The higher the margin, the better it is for
the company as it indicates its operating efficiency. The average operating
margins for TCS over the 8 year period (actual history of past 4 years and
explicit forecast for the next 4 years) stands at 26.8%. We therefore assign a
score of 8 on this parameter.

Net Margins: Net margin is a measurement of what proportion of a


company's revenue is left over after paying for all the variable and fixed costs
inclusive of interest and depreciation charges. Net margin is the final measure
of profitability. It reflects the total profits the company takes home. Higher the
margin, better it is for the company as it indicates better pricing power and
effective cost management. The average net margins over the 8 year period
(actual history of past 4 years and explicit forecast for the next 4 years) stand
at 22.5% for TCS. We assign a score of 8 on this parameter.

Return on Net Worth (RoNW): RoNW is an important tool to assess a


company's potential to be a quality investment by determining how well the
management is able to allocate capital into its operations for future growth. A
RoNW of above 15% is considered decent for companies that are in an
expansionary phase. The average RoNW over the 8 year period (actual history
of past 4 years and explicit forecast for the next 4 years) stands at 34.5% for
TCS. Thus, we assign a score of 9 on this parameter.

Earnings Quality: This measure helps us assess


reported by the company. For instance, some
aggressive accounting practices and recognize
warranted. Earlier recognition of revenues boosts

Sensex 40,000

the quality of earnings


companies may follow
revenues earlier than
profits. However, at the
| 23

same time they do not generate sufficient operating cash flow (OCF). This
signifies debtors are not liquidated on time as sales were booked in advance.
Such companies face working capital issues and their quality of earnings is
poor. We assess earnings quality by dividing operating cash flow to net profits.
Higher the ratio better is the quality of earnings. The average OCF/net profit
ratio over the 8 year period (actual history of past 4 years and explicit forecast
for the next 4 years) stands at 0.85 times. TCS has a good quality of earnings.
Hence, we assign a high score of 9 on this parameter.

Transparency: Transparency is the key to any business. Transparency can be


gauged by assessing the past dealings of the company with various
stakeholders, the way it displays its financial information and the frequency of
management's desire to communicate with external shareholders whenever
some unfortunate incident happens. The easiest way to gauge the same is
checking the level of disclosures in the company's quarterly financial updates
and annual reports. Transparent managements would get a higher rating. TCS
has been fairly transparent with respect to divulging details about growth,
operations and challenges. We assign a score of 8 to the company on this
parameter.

Capital Allocation: Apart from honesty, capital allocation skills are equally
important in assessing management quality. By capital allocation we mean
how the management chooses to deploy capital in the business. There are
many instances where growth is given priority over returns on the investment.
This results in a company with larger size but with poor returns.
Management's are enticed to increase the size since their compensation is tied
to the size of organization they manage. Also, they sometimes destroy
shareholder wealth by making expensive acquisitions or by diversifying into
unrelated areas. Hence, capital allocation skills assume great importance in
gauging management quality. Capital allocation skills are good when return
ratios depict resilience. In short, more stable/higher the return ratios better
the capital allocation skills. The return ratios for TCS have been good over the
years but have declined a recently. We assign a score of 8 to the company on
this parameter.

Promoter Pledging: Promoters typically pledge their shares to take a loan


which is generally infused in the company. This exercise is generally resorted

Sensex 40,000

| 24

to when all other sources of external liquidity dry out. The risk with this
strategy arises when share price falls. This triggers margin calls. If
management is unable to provide some sort of a collateral to the lending party
from whom the money is borrowed that party may sell the shares to recover
its money. This accentuates the share price fall. Hence, higher the promoter
pledging higher is the risk. In case of TCS, there is no promoter pledging. We,
therefore, assign the lowest risk rating of 10.

Debt To Equity Ratio: A highly leveraged business is the first to get hit during
times of economic downturn, as companies have to consistently pay interest
costs, despite lower profitability. We believe that a debt to equity ratio of
greater than 1 is a high-risk proposition. The average D/E ratio of TCS over the
8 year period (actual history of past 4 years and explicit forecast for the next
4 years) stands at 0. As such; we assign a score of 10 to the company.

Interest Coverage Ratio: Interest Coverage Ratio is used to determine how


comfortably a company is placed in terms of payment of interest on
outstanding debt. It is calculated by dividing a company's earnings before
interest and taxes (EBIT) by its interest expense for a given period. The lower
the ratio, the greater are the risks. The company's debt to equity ratio is well
within comfort levels and expected to remain so. At over 30 times, TCS'
average interest coverage ratio over the 8 year period (actual history of past 4
years and explicit forecast for the next 4 years) is more than comfortable.
Thus, we assign a score of 10 on this parameter.
It may be noted that leverage, return generating capability, earnings quality
and management risk get the highest weight in our matrix. Hence, scores
assigned to these factors influence the overall score.

Considering the above analysis, the total ranking assigned to the company is
106. On a weighted basis, it stands at 8.0. This makes the stock a low-risk
investment from a long-term perspective.

Sensex 40,000

| 25

ERMTM
Riskiness (A)

Company Specific Parameters

High - Medium - Low

Points
1 2

Industry risk

Weightage (B) Weighted (A*B)

9 10

Regulatory risk $

5.0%

0.2

Cyclicality risk $

5.0%

0.4

Competition risk $

5.0%

0.1

Sales growth

5.0%

0.3

Net profit growth

5.0%

0.3

Operating margins

5.0%

0.4

Net margins

5.0%

0.4

RoIC / RoNW

10.0%

0.9

Earnings Quality (OCF/PAT)

10.0%

0.9

10.0%

0.8

Capital allocation $

10.0%

0.8

Promoter pledging $

10

10.0%

1.0

10

10.0%

1.0

Interest coverage ratio

10

5.0%

0.5

Final Rating#

106

Performance risk

Management risk
Transparency $

Balance Sheet risk


Debt to equity ratio

8.0

*Excluding extraordinary gains. For qualitative factors, denoted by $ sign, lower the risk, higher the
rating. For any risk parameter if the score is below or equal to 4 it indicates high risk. The risk score of
these parameters is highlighted in red color. For risk parameters where the score is above 4 riskiness is
low. The risk score of such parameters is highlighted in grey.

Sensex 40,000

| 26

Financials at a glance
Consolidated (Rs m)

FY12

FY13

FY14

FY15

488,938

629,895

818,094

946,484

1,086,462

Sales growth (%)

31.0%

28.8%

29.9%

15.7%

14.8%

Operating profit

144,353

180,399

251,528

244,817

305,898

29.5%

28.6%

30.7%

25.9%

28.2%

104,135

139,173

191,639

198,522

242,918

21.3%

22.1%

23.4%

21.0%

22.4%

Current assets

230,617

315,766

428,977

488,130

630,674

Fixed assets

62,671

78,871

102,033

121,425

122,778

Investments

5,746

9,683

22,753

1,692

2,265

Other assets

112,536

115,998

114,527

121,933

133,716

Total Assets

411,570

520,317

668,290

733,179

889,432

Current liabilities

103,870

117,616

155,428

201,322

218,623

Net worth

301,380

393,410

499,028

517,625

658,628

Loans

1,175

2,122

2,548

3,003

1,958

Other liabilities

5,146

7,169

11,287

11,229

10,224

Total liabilities

411,570

520,317

668,290

733,179

889,432

Sales

Operating profit margin (%)


Net profit
Net profit margin (%)

FY16

Balance Sheet

Sensex 40,000

| 27

Market Data
Price on 16th June 2016 (Rs)

2,556

52-week High/Low (Rs)

2,769 / 2,119

NSE Symbol

TCS

BSE Code

532540

No. of shares (m)

1,970.4

Face value (Rs)

1.0

FY16 dividend/share (Rs)

43.5

Free float (%)

26.6

Market cap (Rs m)

5,036,414

Avg. 52-week liquidity (No. of shares) (BSE+NSE combined)

111,913,000

Price to sales* (times)

4.6

Price to earnings* (times)

20.7

*Based on trailing 12-month numbers

Annexure for TCS Ltd: Shareholding (%, Mar-16)


Category

(%)

Promoters

73.4

Banks, MFs and FIs

5.1

Other institutions

16.8

Indian public

4.1

Others

0.6

Total

Sensex 40,000

100.0

| 28

Stock # 3

HDFC Bank Ltd


Continues to Redefine Excellence

A well-developed banking system plays a vital role in the smooth functioning of the
economy.
In a country like India, demographic advantage and growth prospects could provide
banks with a huge opportunity to create wealth for shareholders. However, this
opportunity is fraught with risks primarily from digitization and technology, i.e. upsurge
of non-branch banking. These factors coupled with regulatory policy changes, allowed
more competition, both in setting up of small finance banks and payment banks. This
increased competition will make profitable growth particularly challenging for banks
which do not compromise on the core of the business - lending margins and asset
quality.
Banks typically have a natural advantage to ward off any impending competition i.e.
Switching costs. For any individual, the allure of cheaper cost of loans, high interest
rates on deposits might be temporarily enticing. But it is the switching costs which
ultimately results in a very low customer turnover. This sticky nature of the customer is
now potentially under threat with non-branch banking. This digital makeover of banking
will make it difficult for banks to protect their natural moat of switching. Thus banks will
have to adapt digitization in a big way to retain customers. And this trend is something
one of the leading players in the banking space is taking very seriously.
HDFC Bank, with its plain vanilla banking, has utilized this switching cost moat to its
maximum advantage. It has also displayed how plain vanilla banking can be a safe,
profitable and a value creating business model. Today, even the largest and century old
banks in India are no match for the barely two and half decade old bank.
In addition, the bank continues to find newer avenues for profitable growth. The bank
has realized that its ability to launch products in the digital space, stay ahead of the
competition and at the same time retain margins and asset quality matters the most. It
understands that latching on to the latest fads of the time, like the dotcom, realty,

Sensex 40,000

| 29

power and infrastructure sectors, will result in subpar results or worse adversely affect
its asset quality. This prudence has resulted in the bank being least affected by the
boom and bust in these sectors.
When it comes to servicing its retail customers, HDFC Bank has relied on the model of
wide franchise and low cost deposit base. This is reflected in the form of continued
pricing power and sustainability of above average NIMs (net interest margins). With its
consistency, conservatism with respect to margins, provisions have proved to be
extremely rewarding for the bank. The bank has reported more than 20% YoY profit
growth for over 40 quarters with its NPAs having never crossed 0.5% of loans is a
testimony to its outstanding performance.
The bank stands to benefit from the opportunities that would arise from the group
companies. However it holds long term potential just based on its standalone entity,
concentrating on the core banking potential.
At the same time, the bank has been able to sustain above average return on equity as
well as dividend payout closer to 19% over the past 10 years, thus immensely rewarded
its long term shareholders.
What is impressive is the bank is not resting on its past laurels and continues to invest
in products thus effectively competing with banks and non-banks in the digital banking
space. The banks proactive initiatives give us comfort to sustain higher double digit
growth in the long term.
Having such a stock in the portfolio can help investors not just protect their capital but
also take advantage when the economic growth truly revives. While it is almost certain
that HDFC Banks earnings growth will outperform that of most other bluechips in the
benchmark index, we would recommend investors to consider buying the stock based
on its estimated FY19 price to adjusted book value. We recommend investors to buy
the stock of HDFC Bank at Rs 1,100 or lower.

Sensex 40,000

| 30

Risk Analysis
In order to further improve our risk analysis of companies we have come out with a
revised Equitymaster Risk Matrix (ERMTM). The ERMTM is broken down in to 4 sub heads
namely industry risk, performance risk, management risk and balance sheet risk. (For
details please refer to the ERMTM at the end of the report).

Regulatory Risk: Some businesses are subject to regulations by external


government agencies. These companies are subject to regulatory risk since
they do not have the liberty to operate in a free environment. Excessive
regulations can create bureaucratic hassles and impede growth. Thus, higher
the regulation, higher is the risk for any business. The banking sector is subject
to various regulations imposed by the Reserve Bank of India in terms of capital
adequacy, lending norms, provisioning requirements etc. Based on these
parameters, we assign a risk rating of 4 to the stock.

Cyclicality Risk: An industry cycle is characterized by an upturn as well as


downturn. Businesses whose fortunes typically swing with industry cycles are
known as cyclical businesses. Cyclical businesses do well during an industry
upturn and vice versa. On the other hand, there are some businesses based on
consumption stories that are non-cyclical. These businesses are immune to
industry cycle changes and have less risk. In short, if the business is cyclical
higher is the risk. The banking sector is extremely cyclical and is in fact a
reflection of the macro economy. The sector typically witnesses average credit
growth at 1.5 times GDP growth. Based on this, we assign a score of 4.

Competition Risk: Every industry is characterized by competition. However,


some industries where entry and exit barriers are typically low have higher
competition risk. Low barriers mean more players can enter into the industry
thereby intensifying competition. Low product differentiation also intensifies
competition risk. The banking sector is already very fragmented and
competitive with newer banks having fetched licenses already and more in
pipeline.

Sensex 40,000

| 31

As explained earlier competition in the banking sector is expected to become


extremely stiff in coming years. Despite HDFC Banks strong positioning on the
private sector, we assign a score of 5 to the stock on this parameter.

Income growth: Over the eight year period (actual history of past 5 years and
explicit forecast for the next 3 years) HDFC Bank's income CAGR is 24%. We
assign a rating of 7 to the stock on this parameter.

Net Profit Growth: Over the eight year period (actual history of past 5 years
and explicit forecast for the next 3 years) we expect net profit CAGR of 25%. We
assign a risk rating of 7 to the stock on this parameter.

Net interest margin: Net interest margin (NIM) is a measurement of the


spread that the financial entity makes on its average earning assets (typically
loans, investments and balance with other banks). Banks that are able to fetch
sufficient low cost funds and lend them with a good spread or invest in high
yielding assets have steady NIMs. The higher the NIM, the easier it is for
financial entities to tide over volatility in interest rates. The average NIM for
HDFC Bank over the 8 year period (actual history of past 5 years and forecast
for the next 3 years) stands at 4.2%, which is higher than industry average. We
assign a score of 7.

Net Margins: Net profit margin is a measurement of what proportion of a


company's revenue is left over after paying for all the variable and fixed costs
inclusive of interest and depreciation charges. Net margin is the final measure
of profitability. It reflects the total profits the company takes home. Higher the
margin, better it is for the company as it indicates better pricing power and
effective cost management. The average net margins over the 8 year period
(actual history of past 5 years and explicit forecast for the next 3 years) stand
at 19.5%. We assign a score of 6.

Return on net worth (RoNW): RoNW is an important tool to assess a


company's potential to be a quality investment by determining how well the
management is able to allocate capital into its operations for future growth. A
RoNW of above 15% is considered decent for companies that are in an
expansionary phase. The average RoNW over the 8 year period (actual history

Sensex 40,000

| 32

of past 5 years and explicit forecast for the next 3 years) stands at 19.4%. We
assign a score of 6.

Cost to income ratio: This ratio helps assess the operating cost efficiency of a
financial entity. It primarily takes into account the operating cost for the
company vis-a-vis income by way of net interest earned and other income.
Financial entities that are lean in terms of cost to income ratio manage to retain
a healthy profit margin across cycles. The average cost to income ratio for HDFC
Bank over the 8 year period (actual history of past 5 years and forecast for the
next 3 years) stands at 46.3%. We assign a score of 6.

Transparency: Transparency is the key to any business. Transparency can be


gauged by assessing the past dealings of the company with various stake
holders be it the customers, suppliers, distributors or shareholders. The easiest
way to gauge the same is checking the level of disclosures in the company's
quarterly financial updates and communication with minority shareholders.
Most importantly, the management's willingness to explain its stance if there is
a negative development in the company or stock shows its forthrightness.
Transparent managements would get a higher rating. The management of
HDFC Bank has been a very transparent in its operations. Also it is very
forthcoming with information about the key risks to the business. We thus we
assign a rating of 9.

Capital Allocation: Apart from honesty, capital allocation skills are equally
important in assessing management quality. By capital allocation we mean how
the management chooses to deploy capital in the business or across
businesses. Managements that have in the past destroyed shareholder wealth
by diversifying in unrelated, unviable businesses or make expensive
acquisitions would rank low on this parameter. Further managements that
focus on capital intensive growth at the cost of profitability would also fetch a
low rating. The management of HDFC Bank has always displayed prudence in
capital allocation. We assign a score of 9 to HDFC Bank on this parameter.

Promoter Pledging: Promoters typically pledge their shares to take a loan


which is generally infused in the company. This exercise is generally resorted
to when all other sources of external liquidity dry out. The risk with this strategy

Sensex 40,000

| 33

arises when share price falls. This triggers margin calls. If management is
unable to provide some sort of a collateral to the lending party from whom the
money is borrowed that party may sell the shares to recover its money. This
accentuates the share price fall. Hence, higher the promoter pledging higher is
the risk. With none of the promoters' equity being pledged we assign rating of
10.

Net NPA to advances: A good asset quality is the hallmark of good lending
practice of a financial entity. Financial entities that tend to have high nonperforming assets (NPAs) during periods of economic stress deserve a lower
rating. Ones that have average net NPA ratio in excess of 1.5% are particularly
risky. The average net NPA to advances ratio for HDFC Bank over the 8 year
period (actual history of past 5 years and forecast for the next 3 years) stands
at 0.2%, which is the best in the industry. We assign a score of 9 on this
parameter.

Capital adequacy ratio (CAR): This is one of the most important factors that
are used to judge the soundness and sustainability of a financial institution's
business over the longer term. It shows the ratio of capital to assets financed.
The RBI has stipulated a minimum CAR of 9% for banks as per Basel III. Since
HDFC Bank's CAR at the end of March 2016 stood at 15.5%, we assign HDFC
Bank a score of 6.
It may be noted that quality of loan book, return generating capability, earnings
quality and management risk get the highest weight in our matrix. Hence,
scores assigned to these factors influence the overall score.

Considering the above analysis, the total ranking assigned to the bank is 95 that,
on a weighted basis, stands at 7.2. This makes the stock a low-risk investment
from a long-term perspective. However, apart from the risk score investors must
take into account the latest valuations before investing in the stock.

Sensex 40,000

| 34

ERMTM
Riskiness (A)

Company Specific Parameters

High - Medium - Low

Points
1 2

Industry risk

Weightage (B) Weighted (A*B)

9 10

Regulatory risk $

5.0%

0.2

Cyclicality risk $

5.0%

0.2

Competition risk $

5.0%

0.3

5.0%

0.4

5.0%

0.4

5.0%

0.4

5.0%

0.3

10.0%

0.6

10.0%

0.6

10.0%

0.9

Capital allocation $

10.0%

0.9

Promoter pledging $
Balance Sheet risk

10

10.0%

1.0

Net NPA to advances

10.0%

0.9

Capital adequacy
Final Rating#

5.0%

0.3

Performance risk

Income growth
Net profit growth*
Net interest margins
Net profit margin
RoNW
Cost / Income ratio
Management risk
Transparency $

95

7.2

*Excluding extraordinary gains. For qualitative factors, denoted by $ sign, lower the risk, higher the
rating. For any risk parameter if the score is below or equal to 4 it indicates high risk. The risk score of
these parameters is highlighted in red color. For risk parameters where the score is above 4 riskiness is
low. The risk score of such parameters is highlighted in grey.

Sensex 40,000

| 35

Financials at a glance
Consolidated (Rs m)

FY12

FY13

FY14

FY15

FY16 UA

Interest income

276,054

358,609

425,550

484,697

602,214

151,060

196,954

234,454

260,741

326,299

124,994
54,536
88,071

161,655
71,329
115,519

191,096
82,975
124,696

223,956
89,963
139,875

275,915
107,517
169,796

15,264
76,195
23,461

16,770
100,695
31,693

15,880
133,495
45,849

23,398
150,646
48,487

27,256
186,380
63,417

52,734

69,002

87,646

102,159

122,963

19.1%
2,346.7

19.2%
2,379.4

20.6%
2,399.0

21.1%
2,506.5

20.4%
2,528.2

20.9

27.3

34.7

40.4

48.6

Interest expense
Net interest income
Other income
Other expenses
Provisions and contingencies
Profit before tax
Tax
Profit after tax/(Loss)
Net profit margin (%)
No of shares (m)
Diluted earnings per share (Rs)
Adjusted book value (Rs)

125.3

151.9

170.5

241.1

279.6

Balance Sheet
Advances
Investments
Fixed assets
Cash and balance with RBI
Balance with other banks
Other assets
Total assets
Net worth
Subordinate and perpetual debt
Deposits
Borrowings
Other liabilities
Total liabilities

Sensex 40,000

1,988,374

2,472,451

3,154,188

3,654,950

4,645,940

967,942

1,104,572

1,186,493

1,664,599

1,638,858

23,779
149,916
61,835

24,968
146,308
129,003

26,216
253,572
145,562

31,217
275,104
88,210

33,432
300,583
88,605

218,693
3,410,539

196,824
4,074,125

177,141
4,943,173

190,949
5,905,029

381,038
7,088,456

305,159
69,471

368,640
69,471

443,879
69,471

622,307
69,471

726,778
69,471

2,465,396

2,960,916

3,670,802

4,507,935

5,464,242

192,645
377,869

159,055
516,043

257,756
501,265

382,664
322,652

530,185
297,780

3,410,539

4,074,125

4,943,173

5,905,029

7,088,456

| 36

Market Data
1,160

Price on 16th June 2016 (Rs)


52-week High/Low (Rs)

1,195 / 928

NSE Symbol

HDFCBANK

BSE Code

500180

No. of shares (m)

2,528.1
2

Face value (Rs)

9.5

FY16 dividend/share (Rs)

78.57

Free float (%)

2,956,107

Market cap (Rs m)

890,250

Avg. 52-week liquidity (No. of shares) (BSE+NSE combined)


Price to earnings* (times)

23.9

Price to Book value* (times)

4.1

*Based on trailing 12-month numbers

Annexure for HDFC Bank : Shareholding (%, Mar-16)

Category

(%)

Promoters

21.4

Mutual Funds

8.4

Banks and FIs

2.8

FIIs

32.2

Public

8.7

ADR holders

18.6

Others

7.9

Total

Sensex 40,000

100.0

| 37

Stock # 4

Larsen & Toubro Ltd


A Company Thats Tamed the Beast that is Indias Capital Goods Industry

The capital goods industry in India has grown tremendously over the years. But that
growth has also been marked by extreme volatility. True to its cyclical nature, big
swings from year-to-year have been the norm.
Take a look at the chart below. It shows the year-on-year growth of the capital goods
component of the index of industrial production in India:
Capital goods sector growth has seen large swings
Capital Goods Component of IIP, % YoY growth
50
35
20
5
-10
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
Data Source: CMIE

Over the last nine years, the sector has seen numbers ranging from an output growth
of 48% YoY in one year, to a contraction of 6% YoY in another. Yes, this is an industry
that thrives on large investments by corporate India. And corporate India has large
mood swings as far as its investment-plans are concerned.
Not surprisingly, companies in this industry have a hard time conducting business in
such an environment. Their numbers and profitability suffer and often end up seeing
similar ups-and-downs.

Sensex 40,000

| 38

All but one company, that is. Which one?


Its a company that hardly needs an introduction: Larsen & Toubro (L&T) - the largest
engineering company in India. Its business spreads through the length and breadth of
the Indian capital goods sector. And through all of the ups-and-downs that the
industry has seen, have a look at the companys operating margins:
Calm Amidst the Storm
L&T's EBIDTA margins over the last 8 years,
15
14
13
12
11
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
Source: Company, Equitymaster Research

India's is currently well in the middle of an investment slowdown. It is precisely in times


such as these that it becomes so reassuring to know that L&T's operating margins have
stuck in such a tight range of 12% to 15% through good times and bad. A testament to
just how well-entrenched L&T is in the industry. Its reputation, extensive technical
prowess, and large skilled workforce have enabled L&T to command a certain premium
from customers and vendors alike, providing a cushion to its profitability through thick
and thin.
Being well-diversified within the engineering space has also helped. The company
conducts business in infrastructure, power, defense, metallurgical, material handling,
heavy engineering, hydrocarbons, automation, and the list goes on. It has also come to
derive about 15% of its business from IT and financial services.
Things are not all rosy though. For example, it can easily be pointed out that the
company has been over-ambitious on diversification and has perhaps spread itself too
Sensex 40,000

| 39

thin. In recent times, it has also put a large amount of capital in the developmental
projects business. Higher debt levels have followed.
On balance though, the companys strength in its core business remains extremely
solid. The capex slowdown of the last few years have not been favorable for the
company. Yet, it has weathered the slowdown quite well relative to many of its peers.
We believe that the long-term fundamentals of the company remain strong. The
companys ability to capitalise on a turn in the capex cycle is as strong as ever. It is no
wonder that we expect the company to grow both its revenues as well as its profits at
the brisk pace of over 15% CAGR during the three years to financial year 2019 (FY19).
Given all these positives, we believe that L&T should form part of an investors portfolio.
At the same time, we believe that the current valuations of the stock do not offer the
requisite margin of safety. And hence, we recommend investors to buy the stock at Rs
1,175 or lower (correction of around 21% from the current price levels).

Sensex 40,000

| 40

Risk Analysis
The ERMTM is broken down in to 4 sub heads namely industry risk, performance risk,
management risk and balance sheet risk. (For details please refer to the ERMTM at the
end of the report).

Regulatory risk: Some businesses are subject to regulations by external


government agencies. These businesses are subject to regulatory risk since
they do not have the liberty to operate in a free environment. Excessive
regulations can create bureaucratic hassles and impede growth. Thus, higher
the regulation, higher is the risk of volatility in profit and growth for any
business.
The regulatory framework in India is very conducive for Engineering and
Infrastructure companies. In fact, there is always an emphasis for the
development of the manufacturing and engineering sector. Therefore,
companies such as L&T do not face high regulatory risk. As a result, we have
assigned a rating of 8 to the stock.

Cyclicality Risk: An industry cycle is characterized by an upturn as well as


downturn. Businesses whose fortunes typically swing with industry cycles are
known as cyclical businesses. Cyclical businesses do well during an industry
upturn and vice versa. On the other hand, there are some businesses that are
not very cyclical. These businesses are more immune to changes in industry
cycles in the sector and have less risk. In short, if the business is cyclical higher
is the risk. Engineering and Infrastructure sectors are highly cyclical businesses
as they are sensitive to the economic progress of a country. Thus, we assign a
high risk score of 4 to the company on this parameter.

Competition Risk: Every industry is characterized by competition. However,


some industries where entry and exit barriers are typically low have higher
competition risk. Despite intensive capital requirement and reasonable entry
barriers, many domestic and international players have invaded the
Engineering and Infrastructure sector in the recent past. Though companies

Sensex 40,000

| 41

like L&T on account of its strong brand has been able to avert the competition
to a certain extent. We assign a rating of 4 to the company on this parameter.

Sales Growth: Over the eight year period (actual history of past 5 years and
explicit forecast for the next 3 years) we expect sales CAGR of 15%. We assign
a risk rating of 5 to the stock on this parameter.

Net Profit Growth: Over the eight year period (actual history of past 5 years
and explicit forecast for the next 3 years) we expect net profit CAGR of 7%. We
assign a risk rating of 2 to the stock on this parameter.

Operating Margins: Operating margin is a measurement of what proportion


of a company's revenue is left over after paying for variable costs of production
such as raw materials, wages, and sales and marketing costs. A healthy
operating margin is required for a company to be able to pay for its fixed costs,
such as interest on debt. The higher the margin, the better it is for the company
as it indicates its operating efficiency. The average operating margins over the
8 year period (actual history of past 5 years and explicit forecast for the next 3
years) stand at 12.6%. We assign a score of 4.

Net Margins: Net margin is a measurement of what proportion of a company's


revenue is left over after paying for all the variable and fixed costs inclusive of
interest and depreciation charges. Net margin is the final measure of
profitability. It reflects the total profits the company takes home. Higher the
margin, better it is for the company as it indicates better pricing power and
effective cost management. The average net margins over the 8 year period
(actual history of past 5 years and explicit forecast for the next 3 years) stand
at around 5.6%. We assign a score of 2.

Return on net worth (RoNW): RoNW is an important tool to assess a


company's potential to be a quality investment by determining how well the
management is able to allocate capital into its operations for future growth. A
RoNW of above 15% is considered decent for companies that are in an
expansionary phase. The average RoNW over the 8 year period (actual history

Sensex 40,000

| 42

of past 5 years and explicit forecast for the next 3 years) stands at 13.2%. We
assign a score of 4.

Earnings Quality: This measure helps us assess the quality of earnings


reported by the company. For instance, some companies may follow aggressive
accounting practices and recognize revenues earlier than warranted. Earlier
recognition of revenues boosts profits. However, at the same time they do not
generate sufficient operating cash flow (OCF). This signifies debtors are not
liquidated on time as sales were booked in advance. Such companies face
working capital issues and their quality of earnings is poor. We assess earnings
quality by dividing operating cash flow to net profits. Higher the ratio better is
the quality of earnings. The average OCF/net profit ratio over the 8 year period
(actual history of past 5 years and explicit forecast for the next 3 years) stands
at 0.39. We assign a score of 6.

Transparency: Transparency is the key to any business. Transparency can be


gauged by assessing the past dealings of the company with various stake
holders be it the customers, suppliers, distributors or shareholders. The easiest
way to gauge the same is checking the level of disclosures in the company's
quarterly financial updates and communication with minority shareholders.
Most importantly, the management's willingness to explain its stance if there is
a negative development in the company or stock shows its forthrightness.
Transparent managements would get a higher rating. We have assigned a score
of 8 to the company on this parameter.

Capital Allocation: Apart from honesty, capital allocation skills are equally
important in assessing management quality. By capital allocation we mean how
the management chooses to deploy capital in the business or across
businesses. Managements that have in the past destroyed shareholder wealth
by diversifying in unrelated, unviable businesses or make expensive
acquisitions would rank low on this parameter. Further managements that
focus on capital intensive growth at the cost of profitability would also fetch a
low rating. While the company has decent return ratios, one hopes that the
management does a better job of sticking to its core asset-light engineering
business. Hence, we assign a score of 4 to L&T on this parameter.

Sensex 40,000

| 43

Promoter Pledging: Promoters typically pledge their shares to take a loan


which is generally infused in the company. This exercise is generally resorted
to when all other sources of external liquidity dry out. The risk with this strategy
arises when share price falls. This triggers margin calls. If management is
unable to provide some sort of a collateral to the lending party from whom the
money is borrowed that party may sell the shares to recover its money. This
accentuates the share price fall. Hence, higher the promoter pledging higher is
the risk. L&T is a professionally managed company. There is no promoter
equity. We assign a lowest risk rating of 10 to L&T.

Debt To Equity Ratio: A highly leveraged business is the first to get hit during
times of economic downturn, as companies have to consistently pay interest
costs, despite lower profitability. We believe that a debt to equity ratio of
greater than 1 is a high-risk proposition. The average D/E ratio for L&T over the
8 year period (actual history of past 3 years and explicit forecast for the next 5
years) stands at 2.1x. Therefore, we assign a score of 3.

Interest Coverage Ratio: It is used to determine how comfortably a company is


placed in terms of payment of interest on outstanding debt. The interest
coverage ratio is calculated by dividing a company's earnings before interest
and taxes (EBIT) by its interest expense for a given period. The lower the ratio,
the greater are the risks. On the basis of these parameters we assign a score of
4 to L&T.
It may be noted that leverage, return generating capability, earnings quality and
management risk get the highest weight in our matrix. Hence, scores assigned
to these factors influence the overall score.

Considering the above analysis, the total ranking assigned to the company is 68.
On a weighted basis, it stands at 5.2. This makes the stock a medium-risk
investment from a long-term perspective.

Sensex 40,000

| 44

ERMTM
Riskiness (A)

Company Specific Parameters

High - Medium - Low

Points
1 2

Industry risk

Weightage (B) Weighted (A*B)

9 10

Regulatory risk $

5.0%

0.4

Cyclicality risk $

5.0%

0.2

Competition risk $

5.0%

0.2

Sales growth

5.0%

0.3

Net profit growth

5.0%

0.1

Operating margins

5.0%

0.2

Net margins

5.0%

0.1

RoIC / RoNW

10.0%

0.4

Earnings Quality (OCF/PAT)

10.0%

0.6

10.0%

0.8

Capital allocation $

10.0%

0.4

Promoter pledging $

10

10.0%

1.0

Debt to equity ratio

10.0%

0.3

Interest coverage ratio

5.0%

0.2

Final Rating#

68

Performance risk

Management risk
Transparency $

Balance Sheet risk

5.2

*Excluding extraordinary gains. For qualitative factors, denoted by $ sign, lower the risk, higher the
rating. For any risk parameter if the score is below or equal to 4 it indicates high risk. The risk score of
these parameters is highlighted in red color. For risk parameters where the score is above 4 riskiness is
low. The risk score of such parameters is highlighted in grey.

Sensex 40,000

| 45

Financials at a glance
Consolidated (Rs m)

FY12

FY13

FY14

FY15

643,131

744,980

851,284

920,045

1,026,317

Sales growth (%)

23.5%

15.8%

14.3%

8.1%

11.6%

Operating profit

88,839

98,592

107,543

113,355

123,427

Operating profit margin (%)

13.8%

13.2%

12.6%

12.3%

12.0%

Net profit

46,937

52,057

49,020

47,647

50,905

7.3%

7.0%

5.8%

5.2%

5.0%

Current assets

571,819

681,887

794,411

870,245

993,776

Fixed assets

332,626

396,203

250,208

242,420

229,860

Investments

72,246

75,046

66,762

79,653

79,653

Other assets

216,422

277,915

588,847

749,523

807,678

Total Assets

1,193,113

1,431,051

1,700,227

1,941,841

2,110,968

Current liabilities

461,956

538,753

687,540

777,072

855,216

Net worth

293,868

338,597

377,116

409,091

439,702

Loans

419,755

527,172

603,780

705,692

761,615

Other liabilities

17,535

26,529

31,792

49,986

54,436

Total liabilities

1,193,113

1,431,051

1,700,227

1,941,841

2,110,968

Sales

Net profit margin (%)

FY16UA

Balance Sheet

Sensex 40,000

| 46

Market Data
1,485

Price on 16th June 2016 (Rs)

1886/ 1016.60

52-week High/Low (Rs)

LT

NSE Symbol

500510

BSE Code

943.6

No. of shares (m)

2.0

Face value (Rs)


FY16 dividend/share (Rs)

18.25

Free float (%)

100.0
1,400,854

Market cap (Rs m)


Price to sales* (times)

1.4

Price to earnings* (times)

27.5

*Based on trailing 12-month numbers

Annexure for L&T: Shareholding (%, Mar-16)


Category

(%)

Promoters

0.0

Banks, MFs and FIs

38.9

FIIs

16.6

Indian public

35.7

Others

8.8

Total

Sensex 40,000

100.0

| 47

DISCLOSURES UNDER SEBI (RESEARCH ANALYSTS)


REGULATIONS, 2014
INTRODUCTION:
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as
"Equitymaster"/"Company") was incorporated on October 25, 2007. Equitymaster is a
joint venture between Quantum Information Services Private Limited (QIS) and Agora
group. Equitymaster is a SEBI registered Research Analyst under the SEBI (Research
Analysts) Regulations, 2014 with registration number INH000000537.

BUSINESS ACTIVITY:
An independent research initiative, Equitymaster is committed to providing honest and
unbiased views, opinions and recommendations on various investment opportunities
across asset classes.

DISCIPLINARY HISTORY:
There are no outstanding litigations against the Company, it subsidiaries and its
Directors.

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR RESEARCH REPORT:


For the terms and conditions for research reports click here.

DETAILS OF ASSOCIATES:
Details of Associates are available here.

DISCLOSURE WITH REGARDS TO OWNERSHIP AND MATERIAL CONFLICTS OF


INTEREST:
a.

'subject company' is a company on which a buy/sell/hold view or target price is


given/changed in this Research Report.

Sensex 40,000

| 48

b.

Equitymaster has financial interest Tata Consultancy Services Limited and HDFC
Bank Limited

c.

Equitymaster's investment in the subject company is as per the guidelines


prescribed by the Board of Directors of the Company. The investment is however
made solely for building track record of its services.

d.

Equitymaster's Associates have financial interest in Tata Consultancy Services


Limited and HDFC Bank Limited.

e.

Equitymasters Research Analysts or their relatives do not have any financial


interest in the subject company.

f.

Neither Equitymaster, it's Associates, Research Analyst or his/her relative have


actual/beneficial ownership of one percent or more securities of the subject
company at the end of the month immediately preceding the date of publication
of the research report.

g.

Neither Equitymaster, it's Associates, Research Analyst or his/her relative have any
other material conflict of interest at the time of publication of the research report.

h.

Equitymaster's technical team/other research services have given a 'buy' view on


HDFC Bank Limited and a buy at lower view on Bharat Forge.

DISCLOSURE WITH REGARDS TO RECEIPT OF COMPENSATION:


a.

Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have received any compensation from the
subject company in the past twelve months.

b.

Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have managed or co-managed public


offering of securities for the subject company in the past twelve months.

c.

Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have received any compensation for
investment banking or merchant banking or brokerage services from the subject
company in the past twelve months.

d.

Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have received any compensation for
products or services other than investment banking or merchant banking or
brokerage services from the subject company in the past twelve months.

Sensex 40,000

| 49

e.

Neither Equitymaster nor it's Associates have received any compensation or other
benefits from the subject company or third party in connection with the research
report.

GENERAL DISCLOSURES:
a.

The Research Analyst has not served as an officer, director or employee of the
subject company.

b.

Equitymaster or the Research Analyst has not been engaged in market making
activity for the subject company.

Definitions of Terms Used:


a.

Buy recommendation: This means that the investor could consider buying the
concerned stock at current market price keeping in mind the tenure and objective
of the recommendation service.

b.

Hold recommendation: This means that the investor could consider holding on
to the shares of the company until further update and not buy more of the stock
at current market price.

c.

Buy at lower price: This means that the investor should wait for some correction
in the market price so that the stock can be bought at more attractive valuations
keeping in mind the tenure and the objective of the service.

d.

Sell recommendation: This means that the investor could consider selling the
stock at current market price keeping in mind the objective of the recommendation
service.
Feedback:
If you have any feedback or query or wish to report a matter, please do not hesitate
to write to us.

Sensex 40,000

| 50

Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. All rights reserved.


Any act of copying, reproducing or distributing this newsletter whether wholly or in
part, for any purpose without the permission of Equitymaster is strictly prohibited
and shall be deemed to be copyright infringement
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited (hereinafter
referred as 'Equitymaster') is an independent equity research Company. Use of the
information herein is at one's own risk. This is not an offer to sell or solicitation to
buy any securities and Equitymaster will not be liable for any losses incurred or
investment(s) made or decisions taken/or not taken based on the information
provided herein. Information contained herein does not constitute a personal
recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial
situations, or needs of individual investors. Before acting on any recommendation,
investors should consider whether it is suitable for their particular circumstances
and, if necessary, seek an independent professional advice. All content and
information is provided on an "As Is" basis by Equitymaster. Information herein is
believed to be reliable but Equitymaster does not warrant its completeness or
accuracy and expressly disclaims all warranties and conditions of any kind, whether
express or implied. Equitymaster may hold shares in the company/ies discussed
herein. As a condition to accessing Equitymaster content and website, you agree to
our Terms and Conditions of Use, available here. The performance data quoted
represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Equitymaster
may hold shares in the company/ies discussed in this document under any of its
other services. Please read our detailed Share Trading Guidelines here.
You're receiving this email at [%= :emailaddress %]. If you have any questions about
your subscription, or would like to change your email settings, please contact
Equitymaster at +91 22 61434055, Mon-Fri 10.00 AM to 6.00 PM (IST) and Sat 10.00
AM to 3.00 PM (IST). If you wish to contact us, please click here.
SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations 2014, Registration No. INH000000537.
Equitymaster Agora Research Private Limited. 103, Regent Chambers, Above Status
Restaurant, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400 021. India.Telephone: 91-22-6143 4055.
Fax:
91-22-2202 8550. Email: info@equitymaster.com. Website: www.equitymaster.com.
CIN:U74999MH2007PTC175407
Sensex 40,000

| 51

S-ar putea să vă placă și