0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
7 vizualizări2 pagini
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted a rehearing en banc of a case originally heard by a three-judge panel regarding a dispute between The Stewart Organization and Ricoh Corporation over a contract. The previous panel's opinion was vacated and oral arguments will be held before the full court at a later date, with briefs to be filed on a schedule set by the Clerk.
The Stewart Organization, Inc., a Corporation Walter H. Stewart, and James S. Snow, Jr. v. Ricoh Corporation, a Corporation, Ricoh of America, Inc., a Corporation, 785 F.2d 896, 11th Cir. (1986)
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted a rehearing en banc of a case originally heard by a three-judge panel regarding a dispute between The Stewart Organization and Ricoh Corporation over a contract. The previous panel's opinion was vacated and oral arguments will be held before the full court at a later date, with briefs to be filed on a schedule set by the Clerk.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted a rehearing en banc of a case originally heard by a three-judge panel regarding a dispute between The Stewart Organization and Ricoh Corporation over a contract. The previous panel's opinion was vacated and oral arguments will be held before the full court at a later date, with briefs to be filed on a schedule set by the Clerk.
Walter H. Stewart, and James S. Snow, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. RICOH CORPORATION, a corporation, Ricoh of America, Inc., a corporation, Defendants-Appellants. No. 85-7231.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit. March 14, 1986.
Ralph H. Yeilding, Bradley, Arant, Rose & White, Scott M. Phelps,
Birmingham, Ala., for defendants-appellants. Joseph W. Letzer, Thomas, Taliaferro, Forman, Burr & Murray, Janet L. Humphreys, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion January 10, 1986, 11th Cir., 1986, 779 F.2d 643) Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges and TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge.* BY THE COURT: A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc
with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.
Senior Circuit Judge Elbert P. Tuttle has elected to participate in further
proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 46(c)
Kathy Jo Taylor, A Minor by and Through David S. Walker, JR., Attorney at Law As Guardian Ad Litem v. James G. Ledbetter, PH.D., 798 F.2d 431, 11th Cir. (1986)
Hardin's Bakery, Inc. v. Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union, Afl-Cio, and United Bakery and Confectionery Workers Union, Local No. 441, 893 F.2d 1188, 11th Cir. (1990)
Georgia Power Company, Plaintiff/counter-Defendant v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Number 84, Defendant/counter-Claimant, 896 F.2d 507, 11th Cir. (1990)
Christopher A. Burger, Cross-Appellant v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Cross-Appellee, 796 F.2d 1313, 11th Cir. (1986)
Robin Joy Shahar v. Michael J. Bowers, Individually and in His Official Capacity As Attorney General of The State of Georgia, 78 F.3d 499, 11th Cir. (1996)
Nortek, Inc. v. Alexander Grant & Company, Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants v. Sani Distributors, Inc., Third Party, 536 F.2d 624, 3rd Cir. (1976)
Gerald Eugene Stano, Cross-Appellee v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Cross-Appellant, 897 F.2d 1067, 11th Cir. (1990)
National Labor Relations Board v. W. S. Hallam, R. J. Boggs, R. W. Hallam and Earl Fuller, Copartners, D/B/A Hallam & Boggs Truck and Implement Company, 198 F.2d 751, 10th Cir. (1952)