Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
DONE BY
SUBMITTED TO
OCTOBER, 2014
i|P age
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the work, MODELLING VITAMIN C DEGRADATION
KINETICS IN FRUITS (PINEAPPLE, TOMATO AND PAWPAW) UNDER
MARKET STORAGE CONDITIONS; carried out, is the original work of
ENWEREJI CHIDI BEDE (20091640613).
This work was carried out under strict supervision and has not been
submitted to any university or similar institution for the award of any
degree.
---------------------------ENGR. (DR.) M. S. NWAKAUDU
(SUPERVISOR)
-------------DATE
-----------------------------MR. A. C. NKWOCHA
(CO-SUPERVISOR)
-------------DATE
-------------DATE
-------------DATE
--------------------------------PROF. E. O. EKWUMANKAMA
(EXTERNAL EXAMINER)
-------------DATE
ii | P a g e
DEDICATION
iii | P a g e
AKNOWLEDGEMENT
It is my sincere pleasure to acknowledge and appreciate the head of
department of my unique department of chemical engineering, Engr. (Dr.)
M. S. Nwakaudu, for his unrelenting drive to position the chemical
Engineering department as the leading department in the federal university
of technology, owerri.
My sincere gratitude goes to my supervisors Engr (Dr.) M. S. Nwakaudu,
and Mr A. C. Nkwocha, for being there for me and taking pains to read
through my work and directing me not minding their official engagements.
Thanks a lot and may God continue to bless you and your families.
I also want to express my thanks to the department of chemical
engineering and the eminent lecturers in it for their tutelage through my
stay in the university. You people have being a source of inspiration to me
and for each time I encountered a challenge during the cause of the
project, I always went back to my notes for assistance. May God continue
to strengthen you.
I wish to also appreciate my project partner and colleague I. E. Ireaja, for
his intellectual support to the successful completion of this project.
And finally, I will like to appreciate my loving mother, Mrs T. I. Enwereji,
for her all-round support financially, spiritually and morally, throughout my
stay in this institution.
iv | P a g e
ABSTRACT
Vitamin C is contained in most fruits and vegetables which makes it one of
the most popular and important vitamins in nature. The problem associated
with vitamin C in these fruits is that it can easily degrade when storing
these fruits. This study was aimed at analyzing and modeling the kinetics
of degradation of vitamin C in some fruits under market storage conditions.
The fruits used in the experimental study were tomatoes, pawpaw and
pineapple. The market storage conditions which are the variables that were
used were storing in open air condition and in a sack. The concentration of
vitamin C that degraded were analyzed using iodometric method of
analysis at various times. The degradation was then modeled to check the
rate of degradation of vitamin C under the various market storage
conditions in Nigeria with a view of recommending the best conditions for
storing these fruits. The rate constants of the degradation were calculated
using the integrated rate law method and half-life calculated. The rate
constants for pineapple in open air and sack were 0.24g.l-1.s-1and 0.44g.l.s-1 respectively. The rate constant for tomato, open air and sack were
v|P age
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE PAGE ------------------------------------------ i
CERTIFICATION ------------------------------------ ii
DEDICATION----------------------------------------- iii
AKNOWLEDGEMENT -------------------------------- iv
ABSTRACT ------------------------------------------- v
TABLE OF CONTENTS ------------------------------- vi
LIST OF TABLES ------------------------------------ viii
LIST OF FIGURES ----------------------------------- ix
BACKGROUND---------------------------------------------1
1.2
OBJECTIVE-------------------------------------------------2
1.3
PROBLEM STATEMENT------------------------------------3
1.4
1.5
REFERENCES ------------------------------------------ 44
APPENDIX A ------------------------------------------- 46
APPENDIX B ------------------------------------------ 49
APPENDIX C ------------------------------------------ 79
vii | P a g e
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
PAGE
viii | P a g e
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE
PAGE
ix | P a g e
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
Quality of foods meant for consumption is very important, and the quality
of foods can reduce during storage. The loss of some nutrients such as
ascorbic acidmight be a critical factor for the shelf life of some fruit
products such as pineapple, pawpaw and tomatoes (Laing,Schlueter,
&Labuza,2006),since vitamin C content of fruits undergoes destruction
during storage (Johnson, Braddock, & Chen, 2006; Lee &Nagy, 2004;
Solomon, Svanberg, &Sahlstrom, 2002).
Ascorbic acid is one of the important water soluble vitamins. It is essential
for collagen, carnitine and neurotransmitters biosynthesis. Most plants and
animals synthesize ascorbic acid for their own requirement. However, apes
and humans cannot synthesize ascorbic acid due to lack of an enzyme
gulonolactoneoxidase. Hence, ascorbic acid has to be supplemented mainly
through fruits (Lee et al., 2004). Fruits are major source of dietary
antioxidants that impart health benefits beyond nutrition. The presence of
antioxidants in fruits have been attributed to protect the cells against the
damaging effects of reactive oxygen species resulting in strong protection
against major disease risk including cancer, inflammation, atherosclerosis
etc.Ascorbic acid (AA) is an important component of our nutrition and it is
used as additive in many foods because of its antioxidant capacity. Thus, it
increases quality and technological properties of food as well as nutritional
value (Solomon et al., 2002)
1|P age
many
factors such
as oxygen, heat,
light, storage
1.2 OBJECIVE
The objective of this study is to determine the kinetic of degradation of
ascorbic acid in pineapples, pawpaw (Caricapapaya) and tomatoesunder
the market storage conditions in Nigeria.
The reason of the study is to compare the rate at which vitamin C degrades
under each condition of storage the fruits were subjected to, bearing in
mind the nutritional importance of vitamin C.
The urgency is to recommend the optimum market storage conditions of
pineapple, pawpaw and tomatoes. This will limit the degradation of
ascorbic acid in the fruits,thus enhancing the nutritional values and quality
of the fruits for consumption.
2|P age
3|P age
4|P age
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 MODELS AND MODELLING
The answer of the definition of modeling is not straightforward because it
depends on the goals of modeling and the type of model used. In more
general terms, models attempt to formulate the behavior of systems from
knowledge of the properties of their component parts(Erdi&Toth, 2001).
Invariably, models are simplification of the real world, designed to facilitate
predictions and calculations. Models are tools used in handling complex
situations. Modeling is an attempt by the modeler to approximate the real
world but the truth in principle will not be reached(Erdi&Toth, 2001). The
models help us to see opportunities and limitations of a system to be
modeled. Thus, models can be seen as a way of communicating a view of
the world and they are open to scientific debate. This applies equally well
to kinetic modeling of the quality of food.
A picture of the various ways in which models can be used to describe a
system is as follows: suppose that an input is given to a system that will
respond with an output. (See figure 2.1). If we know the input I and we
can measure the response R, we can use a model to learn about the
system, S. example, if we heat a food (heat is the input) and we measure
the effect on vitamin C concentration (which is the response), we can learn
something about the behavior of vitamin C concentration, in that particular
food matrix (the system), (Demin&Goryanin, 2009). If we know the input
5|P age
as well as the system, we can use a model to predict the response. For
instance, if we know how much heat we input into a system and we know
how the vitamin C in the system responds to this, we can predict the level
of degradation of the vitamin in the system
system(Demin&Goryanin,
&Goryanin, 2009). If we
know the system S as well as the response R it produces upon a certain
input. We can use a model to control or to design, which input we need to
produce a desired output. For instance if we want to achieve a certain level
of vitamin C degradation in a food, then we can calculate how much heat is
needed to achieve this(Demin
(Demin&Goryanin, 2009).. These examples
example show that
models can be used for various goals.
In relation to vitamin C degradation in food with respect to the food
quality, our system is the food, inputs can be processing and storage
conditions and responses can be changes in the vitamin C concentr
concentration.
SYSTEM
OUTPUT
INPUT
FIGURE 2.1
.1 PICTORIAL REPRESENTATION OF A MODEL
Models require predictions; it can be prediction of the response or the
input. Prediction means that it is possible via models to predict events or
situations that were not in away used in setting up the model. This can be
future events, or events that were
were obtained independently in other studies.
Figure 2.1 are sometimes referred to as conceptual models i.e. a
hypothesis about how a system works and respond to changes in inputs. In
other words, it is asset of qualitative assumptions into quantitative ones,
6|P age
constant
(the
gas
constant)
which
is
known.
Time
and
and
temperature
because we
can control
time
and
7|P age
8|P age
-4H
C6H12O6 -----------
C6H8O6------------------------(2.2)
Glucose
ascorbic acid
ease
with
which
ascorbic
acid
can
lose
hydrogen
and
form
synthesis,
the
ribosomes
and
there
hydroxylated
as
Other Dark Green Leafy Vegetables High in Vitamin C (%DV per cup, chopped): Turnip
Greens (55%), Swiss Chard (18%)
#4: Kiwi (Green)
#5: Broccoli
Vitamin C in 100g Per cup chopped (92g)
89.2mg (149% DV) 81.2mg (135% DV)
Other Brassica Vegetables High in Vitamin C (%DV per cup): Brussels Sprouts (125%),
Green Cauliflower (94%), Cauliflower (86%), Red Cabbage (85%), and Cabbage (60%).
#6: Berries (Strawberries)
Vitamin C in 100g Per cup sliced (166g) 1 large strawberry (18g)
58.8mg (98% DV) 97.6mg (163% DV)
10.6mg (18% DV)
Other Berries High in Vitamin C (%DV per cup): Raspberries (54%), Blackberries (50%)
and Blueberries (24%).
#7: Citrus Fruits (Oranges)
Vitamin C in 100g Per cup, sections (180g) Per orange (131g)
53.2mg (89% DV)
95.8mg (160% DV) 69.7mg (116% DV)
Other Citrus Fruit High in Vitamin C (%DV per fruit): 1/4 Pomelo (155%), Lemon (74%),
Clementine (60%), and 1/2 Grapefruit (57%).
#8: Tomatoes (Cooked)
Vitamin C in 100g Per cup (240g)
11 | P a g e
Other Peas High in Vitamin C (%DV per cup): Green Peas (97%), and Frozen Peas cooked
(59%).
#10: Papaya
Vitamin C in 100g Per cup pieces (145g) 1 small papaya (157g)
60.9mg (102% DV) 88.3mg (147% DV)
Other Fruits High in Vitamin C (%DV per cup, chunks or balls): Mango (100%),
Pineapple (131%), Cantaloupe Melon (108%), and Honeydew Melon (53%)..
Source:
USDA
(United
States
Department
of
Agriculture)Nutrient Database
12 | P a g e
quality canned fruits and vegetables often contain more of the vitamin than
fresh fruits and vegetables cooked under careful controlled conditions.
13 | P a g e
The three main factors of the storage environment which influence the
storage life of commodities containing vitamin C are the temperature,
humidity and composition of the store atmosphere (Adisa, 2006).
STORE TEMPERATURE
The rate at which biochemical reactions occur in food increases with
increase in temperature. There is a relationship between ascorbic acid
degradation in foods and temperature. The logarithm of the reaction rate is
a linear function of temperature. In the present instance, the reaction rate
is more frequently measured in terms of Q10 (the ratio of the rate of one
temperature to that at temperature 10C lower) than by Z (the
temperature range over which the rate changes 10 fold). The concept of
Q10 was introduced by Vant Hoff who found that the Q10 for many reactions
was about 2 that is the reaction rate approximately doubles for each 10 C
temperature rise.
Thus, the lower the storage temperature the more slowly do foods suffer
degradation by those biochemical spoilage reactions. In addition, the rate
of growth of bacteria is reduced by lower storage temperature. Also fungi
growth is strongly inhibited by low temperature. It can be inferred that
reduction in storage temperature effectively results in the expansion of
storage life hence reduces the degradation of ascorbic acid concentration in
fruits and vegetables (Adisa, 2006)
STORE HUMIDITY
If the humidity of a store atmosphere is below the equilibrium relative
humidity (or ERH) of the food being stored, that food will lose moisture to
the atmosphere. Conversely, if it is above the ERH of the food, the latter
will absorb water. Equilibrium relative humidity is the relative humidity of
the atmosphere at a particular temperature at which a substance will
14 | P a g e
neither gain nor lose moisture. Thus ideally the ERH should be adjusted to
the ERH of the stored product.
The ERH of a product has a considerable bearing on its vulnerability to
microbial attack. A compromise relative humidity must be adopted for
storage. Packaging can be used to isolate be used to isolate the
environment of the food from the store air and allows food to be held at
the ERH in storage atmospheres of undetermined relative humidity (Adisa,
2006).
COMPOSITION OF STORE ATMOSPHERE
A variety of foods are advantageously stored in atmospheres different
from normal air. The most noteworthy example of this occurs in the
refrigerated storage of fruits. Fresh fruits respires taking up oxygen and
given off carbon dioxide. The rate of reaction can be reduced by cooling, so
extending storage life. It can further be reduced by storing the fruit in an
atmosphere richer in carbon dioxide and poorer in oxygen than normal air.
This technique is called gas storage and it strongly increases storage life.
It is extensively used for commercial use. The oxygen and carbon dioxide
levels used are varied markedly and are controlled to optimum values. It is
used extensively in the storage of fruits and is currently receiving attention
for the storage of vegetables. The concentration of vitamin C in fruits is a
directly proportional to the storage life. If a fruit under market storage
conditions have a short storage period it means that the vitamin C
concentration is degrading at a fast rate (Adisa, 2006).
15 | P a g e
2.3 TOMATOE
The tomato is
the
edible,
often
red fruit/berry of
74 kJ (18 kcal)
Carbohydrates
Sugars
2.6 g
Dietary fiber
Fat
3.9g
1.2 g
0.2 g
Protein
0.9 g
Vitamins
Vitamin A equivalence.(5%) 42 g
beta-carotene(4%) 449 g
luteinzeaxanthin
Thiamine (B1)
123 g
(3%) 0.037 mg
(17%) 14 mg
17 | P a g e
Vitamin E
(4%) 0.54 mg
Vitamin K
(8%) 7.9 g
Trace metals
Magnesium (3%) 11 mg
Manganese (5%) 0.114 mg
Phosphorus (3%) 24 mg
Potassium (5%) 237 mg
Other constituents
Water
94.5 g
Lycopene
2573 g
2.4 PAWPAW
Cultivated papaya, Carica papaya, sometimes known as pawpaw, is afastgrowing tree-like herbaceous plant in the family Caricaceae.
Papaya is generally known as papaya in other countries. In some areas,
an unrelated plant, Asiminiatriloba(Annonaceae), native to north America,
is also called pawpaw. Until recently, the Caricaceae was thought to
18 | P a g e
19 | P a g e
20 | P a g e
FIGURE 2.3PAWPAW
2.5 PINEAPPLE
The pineapple which has Ananascomosus as a botanical name is a
tropical
plant
with
of
coalesced
22 | P a g e
Pineapple, raw
Nutritional value per 100 g (3.5 oz)
Energy
Carbohydrates13.12 g
Sugars
9.85 g
Dietary fiber
1.4 g
Fat
0.12 g
Protein
0.54 g
Vitamins
Thiamine (B1)
(7%) 0.079 mg
Riboflavin (B2)
(3%) 0.032 mg
Niacin (B3)
(3%) 0.5 mg
(9%) 0.112 mg
Folate (B9)
(5%) 18 g
Choline
(1%) 5.5 mg
Vitamin C
(58%) 47.8 mg
Trace metals
Calcium
(1%) 13 mg
Iron
(2%) 0.29 mg
Magnesium
(3%) 12 mg
24 | P a g e
Manganese
(44%) 0.927 mg
Phosphorus
(1%) 8 mg
Potassium
(2%) 109 mg
Sodium
(0%) 1 mg
Zinc
(1%) 0.12 mg
powerful
tool
that
can
help
to
unravel
basic
reaction
=-k[A]----------2.4
[ ]
=k[B]----------2.5
=-k
----------2.7
withkthe (pseudo) zero order rate constant; the rate is seen effectively to
be independent on concentration of B. The rate will, however, depend on
26 | P a g e
[ ]
=-2k[A]2----------2.9
[ ]
=k[B]2-----------2.10
27 | P a g e
CHAPTER THREE
MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.1 METHOD USING IODOMETRIC TITRATION
In the present research, vitamin C standard was used to standardize an iodine
solution prepared by mixing potassium iodate and potassium iodide. Then
vitamins C in fruit juice samples were determined by titration an unknown aliquot
against
the
prepared
iodine
solution.
The
method
was
adopted
paws.wcu.edu/bacon/vitamin C.pdf.
Pineapple
Caricapapaya (pawpaw)
Tomato
28 | P a g e
from
Soluble Starch
II.
Distilled water
III.
Standard Vitamin C
IV.
V.
VI.
0.250 grams of
29 | P a g e
materials:
Heating
mantle,
Grinder,
Filter
cloth,
of the juice samples was added to a 125 millilitres Erlenmeyer flask and
then titrated until the end point was reached and the titre volumes of the
various juice samples were recorded.
3.5 CALCULATION
I.
Average volume =
II.
--------------------3.1
! "
#
"
$ % ! !
" " $
$ $ "
&
" " $
$ $ "
"
III.
#
!
! "
"
$ % ! !
' !
!
' &
&
----3.2
Concentration =
IV.
' &
- $
$!
"
&
----------------3.3
analysis, where
= 02Mwas
32 | P a g e
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
4.1 TITRATION RESULT
The table below shows the results of the titration of the standard vitamin C
sample with iodine solution.
First titration
0.00ml
26.4ml
Second titration
0.00ml
26.3ml
Third titration
0.00ml
26.5ml
Average = 26.4ml
The table below shows the experimental results of the titration of the
pineapple sample under the two storage conditions under study, including
the initial and final titre volumes.
OPEN AIR
TIME
Initial
titre Final
titre Initial
titre Final
titre
(DAYS)
volume(ml)
volume(ml)
volume(ml)
volume(ml)
Day 1
0.00
7.4
0.00
6.3
Day 2
0.00
6.0
0.00
5.7
Day 3
0.00
4.5
0.00
4.4
Day 4
0.00
3.4
0.00
2.6
33 | P a g e
Day 5
0.00
2.8
0.00
1.6
Day 6
0.00
2.3
0.00
1.0
The table below shows the experimental result of the titration of the
tomato fruit sample with the iodine solution. The result contains both the
initial and final titre volumes.
OPEN AIR
TIME
Initial
titre Final
titre Initial
titre Final
titre
(DAYS)
volume(ml)
volume(ml)
volume(ml)
volume(ml)
Day 1
0.00
4.3
0.00
3.7
Day 2
0.00
4.0
0.00
3.4
Day 3
0.00
3.5
0.00
2.7
Day 4
0.00
2.9
0.00
2.0
Day 5
0.00
2.6
0.00
1.7
Day 6
0.00
2.3
0.00
1.5
The table below shows the experimental results of the titration of the
pawpaw sample under the two different conditions under investigation.
TABLE
4.4:
CARICA
PAPAYA
(PAWPAW)
TITRATION
RESULT
SACK
OPEN AIR
TIME
Initial
(DAYS)
volume(ml)
volume(ml)
volume(ml)
volume(ml)
0.00
4.7
0.00
5.3
Day 1
titre Final
titre Initial
titre Final
titre
34 | P a g e
Day 2
0.00
3.8
0.00
4.3
Day 3
0.00
3.1
0.00
3.5
Day 4
0.00
2.6
0.00
2.9
Day 5
0.00
2.2
0.00
2.6
Day 6
0.00
1.8
0.00
1.9
OPEN AIR
SACK
DAY 1
2.80 g/l
2.39 g/l
DAY 2
2.27 g/l
2.16 g/l
DAY 3
1.71 g/l
1.67 g/l
DAY 4
1.29 g/l
0.99 g/l
DAY 5
1.06 g/l
0.61 g/l
DAY 6
0.87 g/l
0.38 g/l
The table below shows the calculated values of the concentration of vitamin
C present in (g/l) in the tomato sample under the two conditions under
study.
35 | P a g e
OPEN AIR
SACK
DAY 1
1.63 g/l
1.40 g/l
DAY 2
1.52 g/l
1.29 g/l
DAY 3
1.33 g/l
1.02 g/l
DAY 4
1.10 g/l
0.76 g/l
DAY 5
0.99 g/l
0.64 g/l
DAY 6
0.87 g/l
0.57 g/l
The table below shows the calculated values of the concentration of vitamin
C present in (g/l) in the pawpaw sample under the two conditions under
study.
OPEN AIR
SACK
DAY 1
1.78 g/l
2.01 g/l
DAY 2
1.44 g/l
1.63 g/l
DAY 3
1.17 g/l
1.33 g/l
DAY 4
0.99 g/l
1.10 g/l
DAY 5
0.83 g/l
0.99 g/l
DAY 6
0.68 g/l
0.72 g/l
The table below shows the calculated values of the functions of the
concentration of vitamin C present in the pineapple sample under the two
conditions under study.
36 | P a g e
ln(C)
4
5
ln(C)
4
5
Day 1
1.03
0.36
0.87
0.42
Day 2
0.82
0.44
0.77
0.46
Day 3
0.54
0.59
0.51
0.60
Day 4
0.26
0.78
-0.01
1.01
Day 5
0.06
0.94
-0.49
1.64
Day 6
-0.14
1.15
-0.97
2.63
The table below shows the calculated values of the functions of the
concentration of vitamin C present in the tomato sample under the two
conditions under study.
Sack
ln(C)
4
5
ln(C)
4
5
Day 1
0.49
0.61
0.34
0.71
Day 2
0.42
0.66
0.26
0.78
Day 3
0.29
0.75
0.02
0.98
Day 4
0.10
0.90
-0.27
1.32
Day 5
-0.01
1.01
-0.45
1.56
Day 6
-0.14
1.15
-0.56
1.75
37 | P a g e
The table below shows the calculated values of the functions of the
concentration of vitamin C present in the pawpaw sample under the two
conditions under study.
Sack
4
5
ln(C)
4
5
ln(C)
Day 1
0.58
0.56
0.70
0.50
Day 2
0.37
0.69
0.49
0.61
Day 3
0.16
0.86
0.29
0.75
Day 4
-0.01
1.01
0.10
0.91
Day 5
-0.19
1.20
-0.01
1.01
Day 6
-0.39
1.47
-0.33
1.39
The table below shows the values of the degradation constant K, the
coefficient of determination and the halflife for the three fruits.
TABLE
4.11:
VALUES
OF
AND
COEFFICIENT
OF
DETERMINATION
FRUIT(STORAG
K (IN G.L-1.S-1)
R2(COEFFICIENT
Half
E CONDITION)
(ORDER OF
OF
life
38 | P a g e
Pineapple (open
0.24(first order)
0.9956
2days
9hour
air)
s
Pineapple (sack)
0.44(zero order)
0.9776
1day
6hour
s
0.13(first order)
0.9882
5days
3hour
s
Tomato (sack)
0.20(first order)
0.9773
3 days
5hour
s
Pawpaw (open
0.19(first order)
0.9987
3days
7
air)
hours
Pawpaw (sack)
0.20(first order)
0.9873
3days
5hour
s
4.3 DISCUSSION
4.2.1 DISCUSSION OF THE EXPERIMENTAL RESULT
The degradationkinetics of vitamin C under market storage condition was
studied by subjecting the fruit samples into two conditions. A sample of
standard ascorbic acid was titrated thrice and the average found is
presented in table 4.1.The error in titrating the standard ascorbic acid
39 | P a g e
thrice was not more than 0.1. The fruit samples titrated gave results that
are presented in tables 4.2 4.4. From observation of the titre volumes, it
can be seen that the titre volumes reduced each day, since the titre
volumes are indications of the presence of vitamin C, it can be inferred that
there is reduction in the amount of vitamin C present.
This inferrence was further evaluated by the presentation of the calculated
values of the concentration of each fruit sample under the two conditions
under study. The concentrations of the vitamin C in the fruit samples in
gram per litre is presented in tables 4.5 - 4.7. From the table it can be
seen that the values of the concentration is decreasing with time. From
observation, the three fruits under study had a lesser amount of vitamin C
degraded in the open air condition than the sack condition. This can be
analyzed thus:
The degradtion rate of vitamin C in the fruits in the open air condition
was lower than the rate of degradation of vitamin C in the sack
condition.
The open air condition is a more suitable medium of storing the three
fruits which will lead to a lesser rate of vitamin C degradation.
the coefficient of determination using EXCEL software. The best fit was
known by the highest number of R2 between the three orders investigated.
The order of the reaction can be analyzed as follows:
Table 4.11 also contains the half life. It can be seen that the time at which
the concentration of fruits in the open air condition to reduce to half of its
original amount is much longer than that of the fruits being stored in sacks.
From table 4.11, it can be seen that the rate at which tomato degrades its
vitamin C is the slowest, evident with the highest time of half life. So
approximately, tomato decreases half its concentration at the time of
study. pineapple has the highest rate of vitamin C degradation.
From the rate equation table in table 4.11, it can be seen that the rate
constants of pineapple fruit sample is the highest among the three fruits
meaning that pineapple fruit has a greater rate of spoilage due to vitamin C
degradation. But the storage of the pineapple fruit sample in sacks leads to
a far greater vitamin C degradation than the open air storage because it
has the highest rate constant.
For tomato, the rate equation of the sack storage condition is higher than
that of the open air condition, meaning that there is faster rate of
degradation in the sack storage condition than in the open air storage
condition. The same line of reason also applies to pawpaw, hence open air
is the best means of storage of the three fruits under study.
41 | P a g e
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMENDATION
5.1 CONCLUSION
The concentration of vitamin C decreased with time in the three fruits at
the different conditions of study. The rate of degradation of the fruits under
the conditions of study were investigated using the integral method of
analysis. The graphs with the best fit were analyzed using the coefficient of
determination (R2). The value of the coefficient of determination that was
the greatest in the graphs became the graph with the best fit. The graphs
were analyzed using EXCEL software. The graph with the best fit predicted
the degradation closely. The models of the three fruits were as follows:
PINEAPPLE: the rate of degradation of the pineapple sample followed a first
order reaction indicating that the rate of degradation is dependent on the
concentration of the vitamin C.While that of storing pineapple in a sack
followed a zero order reaction which makes the rate of degradation
independent of the concentration of vitamin C. From the rate constants,
storage of pineapple in sacks have a faster degradation kinetics than
storing in open air.
TOMATO:
5.2 RECOMENDATION
From theresult I recommend that the storage of these three fruits should
be done in an open air condition, to reduce the degree of degradation of
the vitamin C. To be sure of the best possible condition that favours the
lower rate of degradation of vitamin C, I recommend that other storage
conditions not common to the nigerian market should also be investigated.
43 | P a g e
REFERENCES
Adisa, V. A. (2006). The influence of molds and some storage factors on
the ascorbic acid content of orange and pineapple fruits. Food Chem.
22, 139146.
Adler, F. R. (2004). Modeling the Dynamics of Life, 2nd ed. California:
Brooks/Cole.
Basu, T. K.and Schorah, C. (2005) Vitamin C in Health and Disease.
London: Croom Helm.
Burns, J., Rivers, M.and Machlin, L.(2007) Third World Conference on
Vitamin C. New York: Academy of Sciences.
Davis, M.B., Austin, J. and Partridge, D.A. (1991). Vitamin C: Its Chemistry
and Biochemistry. Cambridge: The Royal society of Chemistry.
Demin, O. and Goryanin, I. (2009).Kinetic Modelling in Systems Biology.
London: CRC Press.
El Moussaoui, A., Nijs, M., Paul, C., Wintjens, R., Vincentelli, J., Azarkan,
M. and Looze, Y. (2001).Revisiting the enzymes stored in the laticifers
of Carica papaya in the context of their possible participation in the
plant defence mechanism. Cell and Molecular Life Sciences58, 556570.
Erdi, P. and Toth, J. (2001).Mathematical Models of Chemical Reactions:
Theory and Applications of Deterministic and Stochastic Models. New
Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Eskin, N. A. M. (1999). Biochemistry of food processing: Browning
reactions in foods. In Biochemistry of foods (second ed., pp. 240
295). London: Academic Press.
Fellers, P. J. (2001).Shelf life and quality of freshly squeezed,
unpasteurized, polyethylene-bottled citrus juice. Journal of Food
Science, 53(6), 16991702.
Harris, J. R. (1996). Subcellular Biochemistry, Ascorbic Acid: Biochemistry
and Biomedical Cell Biology. New York: Academy of Sciences.
44 | P a g e
of
horizontal
gene
transfer.Nature
45 | P a g e
APPENDIX A
A.1 DETERMINATION OF RATE LAW FROM THE CONCENTRATION
VERSUS TIME GRAPH (INTEGRATED RATE LAW)
The rate bexpression for the kinetic degradation of vitamin C is written as
follows
.
= 02M------------------A1
Where
K = Degradation constant
C= quantitative value of the degraded product under consideration
M= Order of reaction
A.2 INVESTIGATION OF ZERO ORDER KINETICS
.
= 02M
Let m =0
.
= 020
62
= 8
67
Rearranging and integrating
.
9 62 = 0 9 67
.:
46 | P a g e
C C0 = - Kt
Where C0 = initial concentration of vitamin C present in the fruit sample
C = C0 Kt -------------------------A2
A graph of concentration will be plotted against time. If a straight line
curve with negative slope occurs then the degradation is of zero order
kinetics.
A.3 INVESTIGATION OF FIRST ORDER KINETICS
.
= 02M
Let m =1
.
= 021
= 8C
1
62 = 0 9 67
2
.:
:
= 02M
Let m =2
.
= 022
= 8C2
9 1/ C = 62 = 0 9 67
.:
>
>
. = -Kt
.:
>
>
.:
+Kt----------------A4
A graph of
>
48 | P a g e
APPENDIX B
DETERMINATION OF THE CONCENTRATION OF VITAMIN C
IN THE VARIOUS FRUITS
Standard ascorbic acid mass = 0.250g
Volume of iodine solution required to react with the 0.250g standard
ascorbic acid = 26.4 millilitres
Volume of fruit sample used = 25 milliltres = 0.025 litres
Mass of vitamin C present in each fruit = X grams
49 | P a g e
DAY 1
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 7.4LM
=
?P
0.250P
26.4X = 7.4 * 0.250
X=
R.S :.=U:
=V.S
0.0701g
0.025l
= 2.80g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = 1.03
for second order plot
= 0.36
DAY 2
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 6.0LM
=
0.250P
?P
50 | P a g e
V.: :.=U:
=V.S
0.0568g
0.025 l
= 2.27g/l
= 0.44
DAY 3
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 4.5LM
=
?P
0.250P
26.4X = 4.5 * 0.250
X=
S.U :.=U:
=V.S
0.0426g
0.025 l
= 1.71 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = 0.54
for second order plot
= 0.59
DAY 4
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 3.4LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 3.4 * 0.250
X=
\.S :.=U:
=V.S
0.0322g
0.025 l
52 | P a g e
= 1.29 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = 0.26
for second order plot
= 0.78
DAY 5
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 2.8LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 2.8 * 0.250
X=
=.] :.=U:
=V.S
0.0265g
0.025 l
= 1.06 g/l
53 | P a g e
= 0.94
DAY 6
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 2.3LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 2.3 * 0.250
X=
=.\ :.=U:
=V.S
0.0217g
0.025 l
= 0.87 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = -0.14
for second order plot
54 | P a g e
= 1.15
PINEAPPLE (SACK)
DAY 1
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 6.3LM
=
?P
0.250P
26.4X = 6.3 * 0.250
X=
V.\ :.=U:
=V.S
0.0597g
0.025l
= 2.39g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = 0.87
for second order plot
= 0.42
55 | P a g e
DAY 2
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 5.7LM
=
?P
0.250P
26.4X = 5.7 * 0.250
X=
U.R :.=U:
=V.S
0.05398g
0.025 l
= 2.16g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = 0.77
for second order plot
= 0.46
DAY 3
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
56 | P a g e
26.4 LM 4.4LM
=
?P
0.250P
26.4X = 4.4 * 0.250
X=
S.S :.=U:
=V.S
0.0417g
0.025 l
= 1.67 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = 0.51
for second order plot
= 0.60
DAY 4
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 2.6LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 2.6 * 0.250
57 | P a g e
X=
=.V :.=U:
=V.S
0.0246g
0.025 l
= 0.99 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = -0.01
for second order plot
= 1.01
DAY 5
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 1.6LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 1.6 * 0.250
X=
>.V :.=U:
=V.S
0.0152g
0.025 l
= 0.61 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = -0.49
for second order plot
= 1.64
DAY 6
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 1.0LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 1.0 * 0.250
X=
>.: :.=U:
=V.S
0.0095g
0.025 l
= 0.38 g/l
59 | P a g e
= 2.63
26.4 LM 4.3 LM
=
?P
0.250P
26.4X = 4.3 * 0.250
X=
S.\ :.=U:
=V.S
0.0407g
0.025l
= 1.63g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = 0.49
60 | P a g e
= 0.61
DAY 2
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 4.0LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 4.0 * 0.250
X=
S.: :.=U:
=V.S
0.0379g
0.025 l
= 1.52g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = 0.42
= 0.66
61 | P a g e
DAY 3
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 3.5LM
=
?P
0.250P
26.4X = 3.5 * 0.250
X=
\.U :.=U:
=V.S
0.0331g
0.025 l
= 1.33 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = 0.29
For second order plot
= 0.75
DAY 4
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
62 | P a g e
26.4 LM 2.9LM
=
?P
0.250P
26.4X = 2.9 * 0.250
X=
=._ :.=U:
=V.S
0.0275g
0.025 l
= 1.10 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = 0.10
for second order plot
= 0.91
DAY 5
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 2.6LM
=
0.250P
?P
63 | P a g e
=.V :.=U:
=V.S
0.0246g
0.025 l
= 0.99 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = -0.01
for second order plot
= 1.01
DAY 6
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 2.3LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 2.3 * 0.250
X=
=.\ :.=U:
=V.S
0.0217g
0.025 l
= 0.87 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = -0.14
for second order plot
= 1.15
TOMATO (SACK)
DAY 1
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 3.7LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 3.7 * 0.250
X=
\.R :.=U:
=V.S
65 | P a g e
0.0350g
0.025 l
= 1.40 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = 0.34
for second order plot
= 0.71
DAY 2
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 3.4LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 3.4 * 0.250
X=
\.S :.=U:
=V.S
0.0322g
0.025 l
= 1.29g/l
For first order reaction plot,
66 | P a g e
lnC = 0.26
for second order plot
= 0.78
DAY 3
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 2.7LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 2.7 * 0.250
X=
=.R :.=U:
=V.S
0.0256g
0.025 l
= 1.02 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = 0.02
for second order plot
= 0.98
67 | P a g e
DAY 4
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 2.0LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 2.0 * 0.250
X=
=.: :.=U:
=V.S
0.0189g
0.025 l
= 0.76 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = -0.27
for second order plot
= 1.32
DAY 5
68 | P a g e
26.4 LM 1.7LM
=
?P
0.250P
26.4X = 1.7 * 0.250
X=
>.R :.=U:
=V.S
0.0161g
0.025 l
= 0.64 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = -0.45
for second order plot
= 1.56
DAY 6
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 1.5LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 1.5 * 0.250
69 | P a g e
X=
>.U :.=U:
=V.S
0.0142g
0.025 l
= 0.57 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = -0.56
for second order plot
= 1.75
26.4 LM 4.7LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 4.7 * 0.250
X=
S.R :.=U:
=V.S
0.0445g
0.025l
= 1.78g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = 0.58
for second order plot
= 0.56
DAY 2
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 3.8LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 3.8 * 0.250
X=
\.] :.=U:
=V.S
0.03598g
0.025 l
= 1.44g/l
71 | P a g e
= 0.69
DAY 3
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 3.1LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 3.1 * 0.250
X=
\.> :.=U:
=V.S
0.0294g
0.025 l
= 1.17 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = 0.16
for second order plot
72 | P a g e
= 0.86
DAY 4
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 2.6LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 2.6 * 0.250
X=
=.V :.=U:
=V.S
0.0246g
0.025 l
= 0.99 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = -0.01
for second order plot
= 1.01
73 | P a g e
DAY 5
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 2.2LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 2.2 * 0.250
X=
=.= :.=U:
=V.S
0.0208g
0.025 l
= 0.83 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = -0.19
for second order plot
= 1.20
DAY 6
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
74 | P a g e
26.4 LM 1.8LM
=
?P
0.250P
26.4X = 1.8 * 0.250
X=
>.] :.=U:
=V.S
0.0171g
0.025 l
= 0.68 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = -0.39
for second order plot
= 1.47
PAWPAW (SACK)
DAY 1
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 5.3LM
=
0.250P
?P
75 | P a g e
U.\ :.=U:
=V.S
0.0502g
0.025l
= 2.01g/l
= 0.50
DAY 2
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 4.3LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 4.3 * 0.250
X=
S.\ :.=U:
=V.S
76 | P a g e
0.0407g
0.025 l
= 1.63g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = 0.49
for second order plot
= 0.61
DAY 3
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 3.5LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 3.5 * 0.250
X=
\.U :.=U:
=V.S
0.0331g
0.025 l
77 | P a g e
= 1.33 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = 0.29
for second order plot
= 0.75
DAY 4
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 2.9LM
=
?P
0.250P
26.4X = 2.9 * 0.250
X=
=._ :.=U:
=V.S
0.0275g
0.025 l
= 1.10 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = 0.10
78 | P a g e
= 0.91
DAY 5
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 2.6LM
=
?P
0.250P
26.4X = 2.6 * 0.250
X=
=.V :.=U:
=V.S
0.0246g
0.025 l
= 0.99 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = -0.01
for second order plot
79 | P a g e
= 1.01
DAY 6
Mass of vitamin C is first calculated
26.4 LM 1.9LM
=
0.250P
?P
26.4X = 1.9 * 0.250
X=
>._ :.=U:
=V.S
0.01799g
0.025 l
= 0.72 g/l
For first order reaction plot,
lnC = -0.33
for second order plot
= 1.39
half life=
:.V_\
`
Therefore halflife is
:.V_\
:.=S
2days 9hours
1day 6hours
PINEAPPLE (SACK)
Rate constant = 0.44
half life=
:.V_\
`
Therefore halflife is
:.V_\
:.SS
half life=
:.V_\
`
Therefore halflife is
:.V_\
:.>\
5days 3hours
TOMATO (SACK)
81 | P a g e
half life=
:.V_\
`
Therefore halflife is
:.V_\
:.=:
3days 5hours
half life=
:.V_\
`
Therefore halflife is
:.V_\
:.>_
3days 7hours
3days 5hours
PAWPAW (SACK)
Rate constant = 0.20
half life=
:.V_\
`
Therefore halflife is
:.V_\
:.=:
82 | P a g e
APPENDIX C
open air
3
sack
concentration in g/l
2.5
2
1.5
open air
y = -0.3914x + 3.0367
R = 0.9593
1
0.5
0
0
sack
y = -0.4394x + 2.9047
R = 0.9776
83 | P a g e
open air
1.5
sack
1
lnC in g/l
0.5
0
0
-0.5
y = -0.240x + 1.269
R = 0.995
-1
-1.5
y = -0.385x + 1.463
R = 0.959
time(in days)
2.5
1/C in l/g
2
1.5
1
0.5
open air
y = 0.1611x + 0.146
R = 0.9853
0
0
time(in days)
sack
y = 0.4286x - 0.3733
R = 0.8552
84 | P a g e
open air
concentration in g/l
1.6
sack
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
open air
y = -0.1606x + 1.802
R = 0.986
0.2
0
0
time in days
sack
y = -0.1817x + 1.5827
R = 0.9638
open air
0.6
sack
0.4
lnC in g/l
0.2
0
-0.2
7
open air
y = -0.1323x + 0.6547
R = 0.9882
-0.4
sack
y = -0.1977x + 0.582
R = 0.9773
-0.6
-0.8
85 | P a g e
1/C in l/g
open air
sack
Linear (open air)
Linear (sack)
open air
y = 0.1114x + 0.4567
R = 0.9799
0
time(in days)
sack
y = 0.2251x + 0.3953
R = 0.9751
86 | P a g e
2.5
concentration(in g/l)
sack
2
1.5
1
open air
y = -0.2146x + 1.8993
R = 0.9704
0.5
0
0
time(in days)
sack
7 y = -0.2457x + 2.1567
R = 0.9726
open air
0.8
sack
0.6
lnC(g/l)
0.4
0.2
0
0
-0.2
sack
y = -0.1954x + 0.8907
R = 0.9873
-0.4
-0.6
open air
y = -0.1914x + 0.7567
R = 0.9987
time(in days)
87 | P a g e