Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • Oral Presentation Assessment Example

    Încărcat de

    armando.chappell1005
    17 vizualizări5 pagini
    The document provides a rubric for assessing oral presentations by student groups. It will assess four student groups on criteria such as the effectiveness of their introduction, organization, technical content, clarity of key points, use of visual aids, speaker behavior, conclusion/recommendations, and handling of questions. Each group criteria is worth 50% of the overall grade. For each group member, their individual quality in terms of knowledge, clarity and explanation is also assessed and worth 50% of the overall grade. Scores from 1 to 5 will be provided for each criteria based on a scale from poor to excellent.

    Descriere originală:

    Oral Presentation Assessment Example

    Drepturi de autor

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formate disponibile

    DOC, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    The document provides a rubric for assessing oral presentations by student groups. It will assess four student groups on criteria such as the effectiveness of their introduction, organization, technical content, clarity of key points, use of visual aids, speaker behavior, conclusion/recommendations, and handling of questions. Each group criteria is worth 50% of the overall grade. For each group member, their individual quality in terms of knowledge, clarity and explanation is also assessed and worth 50% of the overall grade. Scores from 1 to 5 will be provided for each criteria based on a scale from poor to excellent.

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca DOC, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    17 vizualizări5 pagini

    Oral Presentation Assessment Example

    Încărcat de

    armando.chappell1005
    The document provides a rubric for assessing oral presentations by student groups. It will assess four student groups on criteria such as the effectiveness of their introduction, organization, technical content, clarity of key points, use of visual aids, speaker behavior, conclusion/recommendations, and handling of questions. Each group criteria is worth 50% of the overall grade. For each group member, their individual quality in terms of knowledge, clarity and explanation is also assessed and worth 50% of the overall grade. Scores from 1 to 5 will be provided for each criteria based on a scale from poor to excellent.

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca DOC, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 5

    Assessment for Oral Presentations

    GroupNumber:__1_
    Foreachcriteria,thegroupandthestudentwillbeassessedoutof5usingthefollowingscale
    Poor
    Satisfactory
    Good
    Very Good
    Excellent

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    GroupAssessment(50%)
    Description

    Marks
    (a)

    Wastheintroductioneffectiveandinformative?
    Wastheoverallpresentationwellorganizedandeasytofollow?
    Wasthetechnicalcontentgood,includingclearandjustifiableassumptions,methodology,relevant
    conclusions,etc?
    Werethekeypointsandquestionsofthecasestudyclearlystated?
    Werethevisualaids,e.g.,slides,overheads,etc.,wereclear,effectiveandwellused?
    Wasthespeakersbehavior,volume,andmannerofspeakingwereeffectiveandclear?
    Weretheconclusionsand/orrecommendationsdrewthingstogetherwell?
    Weretheteachersquestionswerehandledwell?

    GROUPOVERALLGRADE:___________
    TeamMemberAssessment(50%)
    TeamMember

    VictorJulioEspinozaValverde(D)
    GladysAnitaSanaviaTasayco
    RuthHuarcayaChacon
    BlancaGarciaShiraishi
    CarolinaMateoJurado
    AnaKatiaBarbozaRosado

    Quality(b)

    FinalMark

    (knowledge,clarity
    andexplanation)

    (0.5*a+0.5*b)*4

    Assessment for Oral Presentations


    GroupNumber:2
    Foreachcriteria,thegroupandthestudentwillbeassessedoutof5usingthefollowingscale
    Poor
    Satisfactory
    Good
    Very Good
    Excellent

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    GroupAssessment(50%)
    Description

    Marks
    (a)

    Wastheintroductioneffectiveandinformative?
    Wastheoverallpresentationwellorganizedandeasytofollow?
    Wasthetechnicalcontentgood,includingclearandjustifiableassumptions,methodology,relevant
    conclusions,etc?
    Werethekeypointsandquestionsofthecasestudyclearlystated?
    Werethevisualaids,e.g.,slides,overheads,etc.,wereclear,effectiveandwellused?
    Wasthespeakersbehavior,volume,andmannerofspeakingwereeffectiveandclear?
    Weretheconclusionsand/orrecommendationsdrewthingstogetherwell?
    Weretheteachersquestionswerehandledwell?
    GROUPOVERALLGRADE:___________
    TeamMemberAssessment(50%)
    TeamMember

    CarlosVelaRuiz(D)
    VanessaTorres
    MariaDelgado
    BeatrizQuijanoAranda
    IndiraOjedaSaico

    Quality(b)

    FinalMark

    (knowledge,clarity
    andexplanation)

    (0.5*a+0.5*b)*4

    Assessment for Oral Presentations


    GroupNumber:3
    Foreachcriteria,thegroupandthestudentwillbeassessedoutof5usingthefollowingscale
    Poor
    Satisfactory
    Good
    Very Good
    Excellent

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    GroupAssessment(50%)
    Description

    Marks
    (a)

    Wastheintroductioneffectiveandinformative?
    Wastheoverallpresentationwellorganizedandeasytofollow?
    Wasthetechnicalcontentgood,includingclearandjustifiableassumptions,methodology,relevant
    conclusions,etc?
    Werethekeypointsandquestionsofthecasestudyclearlystated?
    Werethevisualaids,e.g.,slides,overheads,etc.,wereclear,effectiveandwellused?
    Wasthespeakersbehavior,volume,andmannerofspeakingwereeffectiveandclear?
    Weretheconclusionsand/orrecommendationsdrewthingstogetherwell?
    Weretheteachersquestionswerehandledwell?
    GROUPOVERALLGRADE:___________
    TeamMemberAssessment(50%)
    TeamMember

    MiguelPrimodelaTorre
    CarlosJassoGarcia
    OdalisInguanseVizcarra

    Quality(b)

    FinalMark

    (knowledge,clarity
    andexplanation)

    (0.5*a+0.5*b)*4

    KarlyNavarroCotrina
    MarisolJaureguiGomez

    Assessment for Oral Presentations


    GroupNumber:4
    Foreachcriteria,thegroupandthestudentwillbeassessedoutof5usingthefollowingscale
    Poor
    Satisfactory
    Good
    Very Good
    Excellent

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    GroupAssessment(50%)
    Description

    Marks
    (a)

    Wastheintroductioneffectiveandinformative?
    Wastheoverallpresentationwellorganizedandeasytofollow?
    Wasthetechnicalcontentgood,includingclearandjustifiableassumptions,methodology,relevant
    conclusions,etc?
    Werethekeypointsandquestionsofthecasestudyclearlystated?
    Werethevisualaids,e.g.,slides,overheads,etc.,wereclear,effectiveandwellused?
    Wasthespeakersbehavior,volume,andmannerofspeakingwereeffectiveandclear?
    Weretheconclusionsand/orrecommendationsdrewthingstogetherwell?
    Weretheteachersquestionswerehandledwell?

    GROUPOVERALLGRADE:___________
    TeamMemberAssessment(50%)
    TeamMember

    Quality(b)

    FinalMark

    (knowledge,clarity
    andexplanation)
    EdithLeonSilvera
    JazminEspinozaGutierrez
    RicardoBellidoLinares
    JessicaUrdialesCrisoul
    FabrizioVillarH.

    (0.5*a+0.5*b)*4

    S-ar putea să vă placă și