Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
DBM 02031
Development and Monitoring of
Sustainable Candlenut and Castor Biomass Supply Chains
in Lombok Island, Indonesia
Background
The consortium builds on the solid foundations of an existing programme of work on Lombok
initiated through the British American Tobacco Biodiversity Partnership (BATBP), a partnership
started in 2001 between the multinational British American Tobacco (BAT) and three NGOs
(Tropical Biology Association, Earthwatch Institute and FFI). The BATBP has a global focus and is
part of BATs approach to sustainability.
In 2007, FFI (involving technical staff from their Indonesia Country Programme) was involved in
piloting a Biodiversity Risk and Opportunity Assessment (BROA) tool across BATs Indonesia
operations. This assessment tool, developed by the BATBP, is now mandatory across all of BATs
20 operating areas globally to assess and manage the businesss impact and dependency on
biodiversity.
In Lombok, two high risks were identified in need of action, one was an impact and
one a dependency on biodiversity and ecosystem services (BES), though both were related:
Unsustainable wood-fuel use for tobacco curing and water catchment degradation.
From 2008-2009, FFI worked with PT ELI and the local university in Lombok, Mataram University
(UNRAM), to develop a method for PT ELI to monitor wood fuel used during the transition from
using kerosene to coal, to monitor wood fuel use and to make recommendations for reducing
unsustainable wood use for tobacco curing in Lombok. Two of the key recommendations that
emerged were: 1) Alternative fuel sources which avoid the use of unsustainable woodfuel use 2) As
many PT ELI farmers currently still use woodfuel, PT ELI should plant trees with the community to
replace that used by their farmers. These activities should aim to restore the biodiversity and
ecosystem services lost.
Concomitantly with the NL Agency consortium, since 2009, small-scale pilot activities that
considered an integrated approach to watershed management also began and have grown with
BATBP support.
Target group
The target groups of this project are the thousands of small-scale agricultural producers in local
communities in rural areas throughout Lombok Island, the fuel supply sector, and the rural
industries that depend on both for raw materials and fuel. The project targeted more than 2,500
producers and 100 rural entrepreneurs.
Location
The project has been located in Lombok Island, Indonesia. Producers from various locations on the
island have taken part in the supply chains which have been established. The integrated processing
for both supply chains has been constructed near Selong harbor in East Lombok.
Project partners
The project was implemented by Fauna & Flora International (FFI) (through its UK Head Quarters
and Indonesia Country Programme) in consortium with, Indonesian company PT Export Leaf
Indonesia (ELI), and Bosch und Siemens Hausgerte GmbH (BSH) in Germany. The partners have
been making use of subcontracted services from Singapore based biomass and biofuel company
Sustainable Trade and Consulting (STC), Konsepsi and Lumbung (local NGOs active in the fields of
farmer land and forest management), the Dutch Energy research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN)
in collaboration with Lombok University UNRAM, and Advance Consulting BV (project
administration, business planning and reporting).
2
Explanation in keywords
Feedstock development
1.2
Suppliers development
1.3
Distribution development
1.4
Joint
Venture
established
Association
2.2
established
community
nurseries
involving
2,500
farmers.
Apart
from
Watershed
(DAS)
community
protection
forestry
and
(HKM)
measures taken.
2.4
Supply
contracts
and
off-take
agreements secured
The
partners
have
concluded
three
supply
contracts
for
Training
of
producers
and
entrepreneurs
3.2
3.3
pressing,
storage,
handling,
management,
stock
keeping.
4. Feedstock tested and marketing strategy implemented
4.1
household stoves
4.2
industrial burners
developing a PIN.
was decided that RFA was of little added value to the local buyers
market
for
candlenut.
Hence,
an
alternative
sustainability
standard was adopted in the form of Plan Vivo. The partners have
set the first step towards certification by development a Project
Identification Note under the scheme.
5.2
Assessment
of
the
sustainability
criteria
5.3
Dissemination of results
Key Result
Explanation
Infrastructure
for
candlenut
and
supply
contracts
and
off-take
agreements secured.
Farmers,
entrepreneurs
and
Feedstock
tested
and
marketing
strategy implemented.
Plan
Vivo
certification
process
Overall, the project has mostly succeeded in its short-term goal. For rural industry, it has
established a commercially viable supply chains for candlenut farmers in the region. Financially,
candlenut competes well with other sources of alternative fuel, selling at a price of Rp 1,3001,500/kg which is highly competitive with coal and other fossil fuels. Although this commodity
supply chain is not certified (see changes to project below), indications are that by incentivising the
upkeep of existing candlenut trees as well as planting candlenut in degraded areas and preferably
as part of a community agroforestry system there is confidence that the land management
practices are ecologically sustainable. Regarding the castor bean, the project managed to connect
farmers to a Japanese owned company on Sumbawa that buy castor-beans for further processing
into bio-degradable plastics for the automobile industry in Japan. This was achieved by connecting
to a Lombok based company acting as a collection entity for the Sumbawa company.
Adaptations to original project plan
During the course of the project, some changes were made to the original plan which included the
following:
1) In May 2007 the Indonesia Government started its program nationally to replace kerosene
cooking fuel in the household with LPG, distributing conversion kits of stoves, pipes and
LPG canisters, however, at the time the NLAgency project was being developed there was a
spate of media coverage on exploding canisters which was undermining public confidence
and uptake of the program. However, by 2011 the Indonesian Government quite
successfully introduced their LPG cookstove program in the project location in Lombok. This
entailed providing all willing families with free LPG cookstoves and an initial 3 kg-gas tank.
Concurrently, the government is ensuring the availability of subsidised gas. BSH and its
partners have always been clear on the fact that the Protos plant oil stove has
disadvantages in comparison to gas (especially in terms of pre-heating and cleaning). In
the circumstance that gas is both available and affordable, it is clear that end-users will
prefer gas. The fact that gas is being subsidised and the cookstoves being given for free
clearly made the further dissemination and eventual market-case for Protos highly dubious.
In addition, BSHs global Protos stove programme did not achieve the results anticipated
and due to complex technical and operational factors, coupled with the difficulties in the
supply of sustainable cultivated plant oil BSH discontinued the production of the stove
(http://www.bsh-group.com/index.php?109906).
commitment to the testing and dissemination activity related to household stoves and
stepped away from the consortium on fulfilment of their obligations in Lombok. The
remaining consortium members continue to deter the use of unsustainable fuel sources,
including wood, for household usage.
In addition, external and unrelated to the project, a biogas project called BIRU (Biogas
Rumah) started in 2009 which is promoting household biogas from livestock in the North of
Lombok is proving successful and is apparently a more appropriate sustainable fuel source
for Lombok users.
2) As a result of the above development in the LPG sector, the partners decided to halt their
activities related to further development of supply chains for making available bio oils for
the market. Nevertheless, the project till that date managed to connect farmers to
companies on Sumbawa that buy castor-beans for further processing.
3) For castor bean, there is a company in Sumbawa that is investing in a castor oil processing
plant and export the oil to Japan to be used in the automobile industry. Therefore, they
could afford to buy the castor bean at a much higher price than the project could. The
project will use the oil for fuel, therefore the price limit of the bean is maximum Rp.
2.000/kg mean while the Japanese company bought the castor bean at Rp. 6.000/kg.
The project decided that instead of being a competitor with other players in the castor bean
market, the project could collaborate with both producers and buyers, because the project
still can get a potential supply of fuel from the trunk of the castor bean tree, to be used as
biomass fuel. The plan for castor bean was then adapted to working together with the
company to developing castor bean, with the company buying the castor bean from the
farmers and the project collecting the trunk as a biomass fuel. This arrangement also gives
extra income to farmers, since before they had to spend extra money to clear their land of
old castor bean trunks. Now, the cost for clearing and replanting the land can be covered
by selling the trunks to the project as biomass fuel.
Similarly, project partner STC decided not to pursue candlenut oil as an option for biofuel
development, as the costs of shelled candlenut rose during 2011-2012 in the domestic
market beyond the price level that would be commercially viable. Also, STCs efforts to
explore the international market for candlenut oil for other industries such as cosmetics,
soap, and other personal care products indicated a relatively limited and narrow market.
Therefore, STC decided to focus primarily on actively promoting the candlenut shells as a
direct combustion fuel. This proved to be a well-justified choice, that ultimately proved
highly successful in terms of creating viable demand and supply for sustainable biomass
fuels for rural industries in Lombok.
4) The project initially planned to have the supply chains certified against Rainforest Alliance
(RFA). During project planning, RFA was chosen primarily with the aim of accessing highvalue niche markets outside Indonesia but also to help prove the sustainability of the
supply chain in Lombok. However, during the project implementation the team identified
that it was of more business sense to focus on the domestic market. This then removed
any potential added value to the project or farmer from pursuing RFA certification. Indeed
the changes to the castor bean supply chain, meant the project is only using castor bean
waste (stems and leaves), and is not using the bean or involved in castor oil production
directly since there is already an established supply chain for this, so there was limited
option for certification. Furthermore, the candlenut supply chain is highly dispersed with
some supply from Lombok, where the project sources from existing candlenut growers in
community forests and from establishing new nurseries, and some bought from
neighbouring islands. It is logistically difficult and costly to certify the whole candlenut
chains under any certification scheme, including RFA. However, for new nurseries on
Lombok, candlenut was being encouraged as part of a community agroforestry system to
rehabilitated degraded watersheds. The project proposed instead to investigate the
9
feasibility of Plan Vivo for Lombok. This is an alternative certification system to RFA which
does not certify the supply chain, but would certify community-led sustainable land
management practices with an added performance-based financial reward to the
community through sale of credits. If successful it would be easier for the communities to
replicate themselves and at lower cost than other certification schemes. During the project
period, the first step in this process would be realistic to undertake: developing a Project
Identification Note (PIN).
Sustainability effects
In general, the project has been promoting sustainability of the biomass supply chain, and in
particular the candlenut supply chain to various stakeholders throughout the project
implementation period. These stakeholders include producers (candlenut farmers), local processing
companies, buyers, financiers, NGOs and governmental authorities. STC, FFI and ELI have been
promoting the use of candlenut shells amongst (cooperatives of) tobacco farmers.
During the project PT ELI committed through its corporate direction to sustainable biomass which is
embedding demand for sustainable biomass into business operations. In addition to the still
increasing demand for candlenut biomass from PT ELI and other companies, there is also a demand
from ELI for sustainable palm oil kernel shells (POKS). STC as distributing contractor for the project
is able to add this biomass stream to the candlenut stream by sourcing from a RSPO certified mill
in Kalimantan. This provides substantial input and stability to the biomass supply chain in Lombok.
Both these commodities have proven technically suitable for curing, but must be competitively
priced compared to other more unsustainable sources of biomass, be in sufficient volumes and
available when needed.
FFI is participating in discussions on sustainable land, water and forestry management with
relevant actors. Amongst these are local authorities, farmers and the private sector. A Lombok
Watershed Forum (Forum DAS) in existence prior to the project was intended for sharing
experiences, this however has been mostly inactive apart from the social forestry group where
sustainability has been promoted. In relation to this project and FFIs related activities in
Watershed management a Central Lombok District Forum has been established and will further
support promotion of sustainable watershed management and forest use.
In terms of the sustainability impact of the project as assessed against the Cramer Criteria, the
following overall conclusions are drawn based on research compiled by ECN and UNRAM:
For this Candlenut and Castor Bean project on Lombok, the nine Cramer principles can be
positively scored. Especially the production of Candlenuts scores positively for all nine principles,
although some principles are only evaluated in a qualitative way. For the environmental principles,
the Castor Beans production is less positive, due to the higher use of fertiliser in this production
chain.
10
(more efficient and better controlled) ovens will have a likely positive effect with respect to the
emissions of air pollutants.
Principle 8: The production of biomass must contribute towards local prosperity.
Overall farmers are likely to create extra income by e.g. selling Candlenut shells as fuel and
especially by Castor Beans oil as biofuel feedstock. Since most of the planted areas are owned by
the farmers, the profits for these products will be beneficial to these farmers and thus directly
contributing towards local prosperity.
Principle 9: The production of biomass must contribute towards the social well-being of the
employees and the local population.
Since the project is not drastically affecting the existing situation, the negative effects with respect
to the social well-being are expected to be negligible. On the contrary, the project is incorporating
different efforts that are focussed on contributing to social well-being of the local population.
12
5. Lessons learned
Main lessons learned throughout the implementation of the project include:
Project Planning:
-
The partners could have better anticipated the possibility of political change which entailed
the introduction of subsidies on LPG, affecting the commercial viability of the castor bean
oil supply chain.
An inception period to bring all partners up to speed would have been beneficial.
Project implementation:
-
Acceptance by local government and communities has been essential to the project
success, particularly regarding the establishment of candlenut nurseries in Lombok.
Candlenut is proving a very successful multipurpose tree. Historically Candlenut was being
cut down for timber as there was less value in it standing. The project has added value
and is facilitating its recognition by local government as a priority tree for rehabilitation/conservation. The project has helped raise the profile by planting candlenut
as part of community-based agroforestry systems in lands critical for watershed protection,
which have been degraded. It is in line with government watershed -management
programmes, but is also, unlike many restoration trees accepted by communities since
they derive benefits for many years once the canopy has closed without the need to cut the
tree down. An additional ecosystem service that was identified and unintended is that local
beekeepers in one area are keen to move their hives to areas with candlenut since the
flowers are attractive to the honey bees
The biomass supply must be fit for purpose (high grade quality, clean, loadable), in
sufficient volume, ready for timely delivery and competitively priced compared with the
unsustainable alternatives. Success of a biomass feedstock for tobacco curing may hinges
on differences in price of only a couple of 100-200 rupiah/ kg and also the labour required
for feeding the burners 24 hours a day for 5 days.
Having secure demand is beneficial and gives confidence to developing the supply side.
The project has provided PT ELI with an energy alternative that meets the British American
Tobacco group policy on fuel wood use. Therefore the local operating company has now
chosen the direction to support the use of sustainable biomass for tobacco curing. This
demand for sustainable biomass has also encouraged STC to provide alternative stable
supplies palm oil kernel shells from RSPO certified mills in Kalimantan. This result is
even more powerful, because at the start of the project PT ELI were initially concerned that
the approach may not be technically viable and competitive with other fuel sources. The
need for the project to adapt to real world dynamics was essential, this required good
communication with the donor and their understanding to make changes within the project.
One example, is that given the changed focus to the domestic market it no longer added
value to the project or project recipients to pursue RFA certification. Logistically it was not
cost-effective and logistically challenging to certify such a dispersed supply base.
The
domestic market still needs confidence that biomass should come from sustainable sources,
however, RFA was not the best way for the project to give this reassurance. The
establishment of the Association provides some reassurance, as well as assessments by
ECN and also the nature of community agro-forestry system being promoted. In
13
retrospect, however, a better analysis of the certification options could have been
considered during project planning. Indeed the costs and timings of any certification both
in establishment and post project should be properly considered. Not just the costs of
assessment itself but also for preparation of relevant data and any improvement activities
that need to be undertaken to conform with certification requirements.
-
Moisture content (MC) really needs to be taken into account. When the biomass is bought
in its raw form, the moisture content is usually very high and when it is ready to be used
as fuel up to 15% or more of the MC can be lost depending on the product. This loss in
moisture content really affects the cost structure of the biomass as fuel. The MC content
also determines in what measurement unit the biomass is bought or sold. If the MC
content is very high buying by weight is not a good idea because if it will be sold when the
biomass is dry enough, then the loss is consider a cost. Buying the biomass in unit size
like per bag or per cubic meter is another option when buying or selling biomass fuel,
instead of using weight as other fuel. During the course of the project, the selling trends for
candlenut shells shifted from per bag to per kg as farmers felt there was less risk involved
therein.
Conversions from fossil fuel to biomass fuel also raise the question about fuel consumption
and the total cost that farmers have to pay. The project is working mostly with tobacco
farmers, and the tobacco harvest seasons only happen once a year for three months. The
first year of the project was spent to convince all the parties involved that biomass could
replace other unsustainable fuel and provide the same level of performance and economic
viability.
In the second year of the project the project team calculated the economics of using
candlenut shells. The cost of burning candlenut shell was compared against the cost of
using other fuels (including coal, fire wood, palm kernel shells, kerosene), the cost
compared not just the direct cost of the fuel, but also the indirect cost of the fuel (i.e.
investment in equipment, labour cost and others) which are also factors in choice over fuel
usage. At the time of the survey, candlenut shells used alone or as a mix with other fuels
compared competitively.
14
FFI will continue to contribute to the establishment of sustainable supply chains and activities
through which it can contribute to the further protection of endangered forests and watersheds in
Indonesia. To that end, the lessons learned provide a valuable basis for future activities for which
broad support and consensus from different stakeholders (including government, private sector,
NGOs, etc) ensures sustained results while benefitting people and the environment.
15
Colophon
Date
19 September 2013
Status
Final report
Project number
DBM02031
Contact person Ag NL
This study was carried out in the framework of the Global Sustainable Biomass Fund, with financial
support from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Name organisation
Contact person
Address
www.fauna-flora.org
16