Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Contents:
1. Introduction
List of Figures
2. Project Objectives
3. Leveling and its Applications
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
Methods of leveling
Main Equipment
Types of Errors
A list of Definitions
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
5.1
5.2
6.1
6.2
6.3
Areas
Volumes
Mass-Haul Diagram (MHD)
4. Contouring
7. A case study
Abstract
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Route Location
7.3 Profile and Cross-Sections
7.4 Calculation of Earthwork
7.4.1 Areas of Cross-Sections
7.4.2 Volumes of Earthwork
7.5 Mass-Haul Diagram
8. Conclusion
References
Appendices
9.
1.
Introduction:
2.
Project Objectives:
3.
(ii)
readings
made
Leveling Staf
4.
Contouring:
A Contour line is an imaginary
outline of the terrain obtained by joining its points of equal
elevation above a given level, such as mean sea level. It
is sometimes visible, such as the shorelines of a lake,
since water assumes a level surface. A map illustrating
11
(ii)
12
No.
Factor
(Table 4.1)
there
are
two methods
(i)
Direct method: It
method out of all, in
contour is traced and
These lines are then
they can be mapped.
(ii)
is the most
which the line
marked on the
plan surveyed
of
precise
of each
ground.
so that
(a)
(b)
Radiating method: In this method
several radial lines at selected angle interval
are taken from a point in the area. On these
lines at selected distances points are marked
and levels determined. This method is
particularly used for large and hilly areas.
Theodolite
with
tachometry
facility
is
commonly used in this method. (Fig 4.2)
14
Table 4.2 below summarizes the pros and cons, as well as the
features that differentiate each of the two methods in indirect
Direct Method
Indirect Method
Expensive
Reasonable cost
Calculations can be
After contouring, calculation cannot
checked as and when
be checked.
needed
contouring.
15
(Table 4.2)
(ii)
16
(viii)
other depression.
(ix) Contour lines of ridge show higher elevation
within the loop of the contours. Contour lines
cross ridge at right angles (Fig. 4.4).
(x)
Fig 4.1
17
4.3
Fig 4.4
5.
Longitudinal
Cross Section:
5.1
Section
(Profile)
and
5.2
Cross Sections:
19
20
6.
Earthwork Calculations:
21
6.1 Areas:
To
be able to
calculate
the
volume of
earthwork,
the
area of the
crosssections
along the center line at each station must be
calculated. These areas tell us the amount of cut and
fill.
The ground levels may be horizontal, sloped and
even variable across the section; accordingly several
methods are used to determine the area of crosssection.
(i)
Level Across:
22
(ii)
(iv)
Sec
tio
of Variable
Level
23
6.2 Volumes:
Earthwork is expressed in
units of volumes (cubic
meters in metric.)
To determine the amount of
earthwork to occur on a given
site,
the
volumes
are
calculated, depending on the
shape of the site, in three
ways:
i
24
ii
iii
(b)
(c)
26
27
8.1 Introduction
The project is to locate and draw the best route between two selected
points on a contour map, and to calculate the amount of earthwork
needed to construct it.
28
The two selected points A and B on the contour map are located in a mountainous region, at
an elevation of 400m and 360m (relative to Mean Sea level.) When the route was designed,
certain standards had to be met; the slope between any two stations had to be less than 4%,
LC
LB
With a road width set to 10m, a depth of cut/Fill (x), and each side
slope of width 2(x), the equation above was derived. Values of the
cross-sectional areas for each station are found in table.
2x
10 m
x
10
30
2x
Cut
volumes are taken to be positive and fill volumes to
be negative. The corrected volume is calculated by
taking in consideration a shrinkage factor of 0.8
applicable to fill. The list of Data about volumes,
corrected volumes and cumulative volumes are found
in table.
distance (L) between two cross-sections (See Diagram.)
31
(See Diagram)
Mass-Haul Diagram
40000
20000
0
-20000 0
210
420
630
840
1050
1260
1470
1680
1820
-40000
-60000
-80000
Cumulative Volume
-100000
-120000
-140000
-160000
-180000
-200000
-220000
Chainage
9. Conclusion
The route designed runs a total horizontal distance of 2450m, with 13
stations starting at A and ending at B. The distance between each station
is 210m, except for the distance between station 9 and 10 which is 140m.
The Road width is 10m, while side slopes width are two times the depth of
cut or fill. Throughout the project there are no horizontal formation lines
connecting two stations to maintain water flow. There are 4 gradients:
1) 0+000 to 0+420: 0.493%
32
2030
2240
33
Appendix:
Appendix A:
Appendix B:
34
35