DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Shawkat ES. The effect of the oxygen inhibition layer on interfacial bond
strengths and stain resistance of dental resin composites. Thesis. Birmingham:
College of Medical and Dental Sciences University of Birmingham, 2009: 2-24.
2. Joshi P. Rujuta C. Silorane composite system: review article. Scientific Journal
2008: II.
3. El-Nawawy M, Koraitim L, Abouelatta O, Hegazi. Marginal adaptation of
nanofilled, packable and hybrid dental composite resins stored in artificial saliva.
American Journal of Biomedical Engineering 2012; II(3): 105-14.
4. Cakir D, Sergent R, Burgess JO. Polymerization shrinkage-a clinical review.
Aegis Communication 2007; 3(8).
5. Karthick K, Kailasam S, Priya G, Shankar S. Polymerization shrinkage of
composite A review. JIADS 2011; 2(2).
6. Nisha G, Amit G. Textbook of operative dentistry. New Delhi: Jaypee, 2010: 24867.
7. Gupta KV, Verma P, Trivedi A. Evaluation of microleakage of various
restorative materials: An in vitro study. J Life Sci. 2011; III(1): 29-33.
8. Roberson MT, Heymann HO, Ritter AV. Introduction to composite restorations.
In: Sturdevant's Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed., St. Louis,
Missouri: Mosby Elsevier, 2009: 50414.
9. Ghulman MA G. Effect of cavity configuration (C factor) on the marginal
adaptation of low-shrinking composite: A comparative ex vivo study. International
Journal of Dentistry 2011.
10. Baum L, Philips RW, Lund MR. Buku ajar ilmu konservasi gigi. Ed 3. Jakarta:
EGC, 2007.
11. Hilton TJ, Broome JC. Direct posterior esthetic restoration. In: Fundamental of
Operative Dentistry: A contemporary approach. 3rd ed., New Delhi, India:
Quintessence Books, 2006: 306-7

Universitas Sumatera Utara

12. Bergmann P, Noack MJ, Roulet JF. Effect of cavity design on the marginal fit of
class I composite fillings. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1990; 45(10). (Abstract)
13. Terry D LK. Composite resin restorations : a simplified approach. Private
Dentistry April 2008: 30.
14. Dias KRC, Dias ARC, Lamosa AC, Rezende LB, Filho HS. Evaluation of the
bevel effects on the resin restoration microleakage. Universidade do Estado do
Rio de Janeiro 2005. (Abstract)
15. Margeas, RC. The properties and selection of posterior direct restorations. The
Academy of Dental Therapeutic and Stomatology: 2008 http://www.ineedce.com.
(21 Juli 2012)
16. Product Profile. FiltekTM Silorane: Low shrink posterior restorative Silorane
System adhesive: Self-etch primer and bond. 3M ESPE 2007: 2-7.
17. Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R. Silorane in dental composites. Dent
Mater. 2005. 21(1): 68-74.
18. Al-Boni R, Raja OM. Microleakage evaluation of silorane based composite
versus methacrylate based composite. J of Cons Dentistry 2010; 13(3).
19. Study Booklet. A collection of scientific results: Filtek P90 low shrink posterior
restorative. 3M ESPE 2007.
20. Duarte S, Botta AC, Phark Jin-Ho, Sadan A. Selected mechanical and physical
properties and clinical application of a new low-shrinkage composite restoration.
Quintessence International 2009; 40(8).
21. Anusavice, KJ. Philip: buku ajar ilmu bahan kedokteran gigi. Ed. 10. Jakarta:
EGC, 2004: 248.
22. Filho HN, et al. Volumetric polymerization shrinkage of contemporary composite
resin. J Appl Oral Sci 2007; 15(5).
23. Braga RR, Ballester RY, Ferracane JL. Factors involved in the development of
polymerization shrinkage stress in resin-composites: a systematic review. Dental
Materials 2005; 21: 963-66
24. OBrien WJ. Polymeric Restoration materials. In: Dental Materials and Their
Selection. 4th ed., Canada: Quintessence Books 2008: 121.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

25. Sikri KV. Textbook of operative dentistry. 2nd ed., Amritsar: CBS, 2009: 364-5,
605-9.
26. Schneider LF, Cavalcante LM, Silikas N. Review articleshrinkage stress
generated during resincomposite applications: A review. J of Dent
Biomechanics 2010.
27. Albers, HF. Tooth-colored restoratives: principles and techniques. 9th ed.
London: BC Decker Inc, 2002: 127, 209-11
28. Perdigao J, Swift EJ. Fundamental concepts of enamel and dentin adhesion. In:
Sturdevant's art and science of operative dentistry. 5th ed., St. Louis, Missouri:
Mosby Elsevier 2009: 245-56.
29. Bayne SC, Thompson JY. Biomaterial. In: Sturdevant's art and science of
operative dentistry. 5th ed., St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier 2009:185-88.
30. Tseng KC, Weinberg GA, Woodlock DF. Dental adhesivesthe foundation of
estethic dentistry. Academy of General Dentistry 2007.
31. Mutluay AT, Lassila LVJ, Valittu PK. Incremental layers bonding of silorane
composite: the initial bonding properties. Finland: University of Turku. 2008.
32. Suhail RI, Al-Khafaji AH. The effect of low shrinkage dental composite on the
fracture strenght of weakened premolar teeth (An in vitro study). J Bagh College
Dentistry 2011; 23(3): 32-5.
33. Studervant JR. Clinical significance of dental anatomy, histology, physiologi and
occlusion. In: Studervants Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed., St.
Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier, 2009: 20.
34. Jazar HA, El Sayed GE, Mahmoud SH, Hassan AM. Microleakage and surface
hardness of resin based restorative materials cured with led and qth curing units.
Cairo Dental Journal 2009; 25(3): 403.
35. Bo-Tao, Lin H, Zheng G, et al. Comparison between a silorane-based composite
and

methacrylate-based

composites:

shrinkage

characteristics,

thermal

properties, gel point and vitrification point. Dent Mater J 2012; 31(3).
36. Van Ende A, Munck JD, Mine A, Lambrecht P, Van Meerbeek B. Does a lowshrinking composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface. Dent Mater 2009;
10(3).

Universitas Sumatera Utara

37. Coelho-de-Souza FH, Camacho GB, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Fracture
resistance and gap formation of MOD Restorations: influence of restorative
technique, bevel preparation and water storage. Operative Dentistry 2008; 33(1).
38. Coelho-de-Souza FH, et al. A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior
composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow up. J Appl Oral Sci
2012; 20(2).

Universitas Sumatera Utara