Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
____________________________
Counterfeiting is widely considered as one of the
counterfeited
campaigns.
the
of
counterfeiting.
counterfeited
Mediterranean
When
Area.
buying
Two
types
products
according
the
WHO).
question.
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
Academic
importance.
common
counterfeiting
methods
(Harvey
&
consequences
Cognitive Dissonance
of
international
product
factors
buy counterfeited
1996).
emotional
leading
people
to
explanation
for
the
purchase
of
market.
on
the
already did/do.
Attitude
purchase
topic,
towards
intentions.
although
ethically
This
debatable
explains
why
Chamber
of
Commerce,
2004)
and
foreign
brands.
that
increased
dimension
would
have
of
contributed
collectivism
to
could
be
further
investigated
entities
spenders
socio-
relatively
secondary
finding
education,
clusters,
normative
differing
low
and
on
monthly
children.
influence
number
of
income,
For
both
has positive
effects on
serving
that
different
consumers
purposes.
do
often
Actually,
purchase
processed
appears reversed
in the
case
of
counterfeits.
counterfeited good.
internal sovereignty.
Mimetic
Consumption
of
Non-Deceptive
Violence et le Sacr)
Counterfeits
This group pressure is likely to lead to conformity
Counterfeiters
reference
maintaining
individual
respected.
specific
informational
type
the
of
hypothesis
mimesis
as
of
groups.
Utilitarian
Value-expressive
reference
reference
group
group
the paper.
there is strong reference group influence for publicluxury product and brand decisions and negligible
Consumer
Misbehaviour
in
the
Social
Environment
Attribution
Processes
Counterfeiters
not.
attribution
process)
of
provides
Non-deceptive
an
important
attribution process).
do other consumers.
implication
of
their
research
concerns
the
Consumers
high
toward
attitudes
and
ethical
counterfeiting issues.
toward
illicit
consumption
needs
showing
for
ethical
autonomy,
counterfeiting
beliefs
less
matter
and
beliefs
innovation
the
and
counterfeiters
when
dealing
with
mediates the effects of attributions regarding peergroup illicit consumption on intention to conform
(Rose et al., 2001).
XXIst
environment
the very first time at the end of the 70s, with the
the
drugs,
consumers
perspective,
as
with
century
consumers
qualified
by
live
in
social
researchers
as
metaphor
to
describe
the
postmodern
2005).
negative
or
aspects
regarding
either
people
consumption
is
perfectly
coherent
with
the
Postmodern
ethics
or
the
legitimating
of
counterfeits
Fragmentation of the consumers life
Fragmentation is a major property of postmodern
Juxtaposition of opposites
direct
function;
life
(scruples,
fragmentation
of
consumers
consequence
guilty
of
the
conscience,
This is the
juxtaposition
sin).
of
Moral
10
RESEARCH PROPOSITIONS
characteristics.
goes
along
interrogation
with
self-definition
processes
and
(Lipovetsky,
self2004).
situation.
(Maffesoli,
counterfeited
1988).
It
is
the
field
where
luxury good,
the
consumer
is
values
allowing
misbehaviours,
relative
and
11
reference
himself
se.
group.
Besides,
he
finds
Observation Method
counterfeited goods).
12
allows
measurement
of
actual
Depth Interview
Depth
interviews
are
much
the
same
as
13
research.
consumption
of
expressive montages.
experiences
in
the
minds
the
following
phrase
What
14
conceptualize
it
as
involving
competing
Projective techniques
process.
15
Another
interesting
investigation
could
be
IMPLICATIONS
Managerial Implications
namely
is
ones.
Conclusion
believe
video-elicitation.
that
environment
investigation
might
impact
The
technique
how
the
cultural
on
the
pressure
several
potential
explanations
enabling
the
16
most
obvious
patterns
of
the
behavioural
REFERENCES
ALBERS-MILLER Nancy D. (1999), Consumer
Misbehaviour: Why People Buy Illicit Goods, Journal
of Consumer Marketing, 16 (3), 273-287
ANG Swee H., CHEND Peng S., LIM Elison A.C. &
TAMBYAH Siok K. (2001), Spot the Difference:
Consumer Responses Towards Counterfeits, Journal of
Consumer Marketing, 18 (3), 219-235
BAUDRILLARD Jean (1970),
Consommation, Ed. Denol, Paris
La
Socit
de
17
Les
Temps
18
19