Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
2d 256
Milton Seaman, New York City (Kreis & Seaman, New York City, on the
brief), for appellant.
No argument for appellee.
Before MARIS, GOODRICH and McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges.
MARIS, Circuit Judge.
all, and to the best of the petitioner's knowledge all of the attorney's connections
with the bankrupt or debtor, the creditors or any other party in interest, and their
respective attorneys. If satisfied that the attorney represents no interest adverse
to the receiver, the trustee, or the estate in the matters upon which he is to be
engaged, and that his employment would be to the best interests of the estate,
the court may authorize his employment, and such employment shall be for
specific purposes unless the court is satisfied that the case is one justifying a
general retainer. * * * '1
4
11 U.S.C.A.following 53
In re H. L. Stratton, Inc., 2 Cir., 1931, 51 F.2d 984, certiorari denied Jonas &
Neuburger v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 284 U.S. 682, 52 S.Ct. 199, 76
L.Ed. 576; In re Progress Lekto Shave Corporation, 2 Cir., 1941, 117 F.2d 602;
Albers v. Dickinson, 8 Cir., 1942, 127 F.2d 957, 961; Gochenour v. Cleveland
Terminals Bldg. Co., 6 Cir., 1944, 142 F.2d 991, 995, certiorari denied 323
U.S. 767, 65 S.Ct. 120, 89 L.Ed. 614
11 U.S.C.A. 647