Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
RSUM CONTEXTE : Lincidence accrue des infections urinaires causes par Escherichia coli et Klebsiella
pneumoniae produisant des -lactamases spectre tendu (BLSE) a limit les options thrapeutiques par voie
orale. La fosfomycine sest avre trs efficace contre
ces organismes, mais les donnes manquent concernant
son utilisation au Liban et au Moyen-Orient.
OBJECTIF : Dterminer lactivit in vitro de la fosfomycine contre les uropathognes E. coli et K. pneumoniae BLSE et non BLSE au Liban.
MTHODES : Un total de 542 colonies non dupliques
de E. coli (n = 374) et K. Pneumoniae BLSE (n = 236),
ainsi que 291 colonies E. coli (n = 236) et K. pneumoniae non BLSE (n = 55) ont t isoles partir dchantillons durine des patients tests lAUBMC durant
lanne 2010. Chaque colonie a t teste contre une
batterie de 13 antibiotiques par la mthode de diffusion
sur disque selon les critres dexamens et dinterprtation des rsultats du CLSI.
RSULTATS : La sensibilit la fosfomycine des colonies produisant BLSE contre celles nen produisant pas
est de 86% contre 97% pour E. coli, et 62% contre 78%
pour K. pneumoniae. Lactivit de la fosfomycine contre
les germes E. coli et K. pneumoniae produisant BLSE est
plus leve que celle de : cfpime (26% contre 30%),
ciprofloxacine (24% contre 41%), Trimeth/sulfa (26%
contre 19%), Pip/taz (75% contre 45%), gentamicine
(45% contre 42%) et tobramycine (32% contre 26%).
Dautre part, lamikacine a dmontr une activit plus
leve contre E. coli et K. pneumoniae produisant BLSE
(96% et 79% respectivement), ainsi que limipenem
(99,7% et 98,8% respectivement). La nitrofurantone
sest avre trs efficace contre E. coli BLSE (95%) mais
non pas contre K. pneumoniae BLSE (29%).
CONCLUSION : La fosfomycine montre une bonne
activit sur les uropathognes au Liban, bien plus prononce sur E. coli BLSE que sur K. pneumoniae BLSE.
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
Statistical analysis
The differences in susceptibility or resistance between the
groups were compared with 2 test. A p-value < 0.05 was
considered statistically significant. Our data was analyzed
with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software
for Windows Version 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Bacterial isolates
A total of 542 non-duplicate consecutive isolates of
ESBL-EC (n = 374) and ESBL-KP (n = 168), and 291 isolates of non-ESBL-EC (n = 236) and non-ESBL-KP
(n = 55) were recovered from urine specimens of patients
TABLE I
Number of isolates
Gender [% female]
Mean age [years (SD)]
Age groups [%]
15
16-60
> 60
Service [%]
Inpatient
Outpatient
PATIENTS DEMOGRAPHICS *
ESBL
ESCHERICHIA COLI
Non-ESBL
236
81
55 ( 24)
17
29
54
42
58
374
75
54 ( 27)
610
78
54 ( 26)
ESBL
168
58
52 (29)
KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE
Non-ESBL
55
86
47 ( 24)
223
67
50 ( 28)
833
74
54 ( 27)
8
41
52
13
34
53
22
24
54
13
52
35
19
33
48
14
34
52
22
88
34
66
52
48
20
80
45
55
37
63
Total
Total
TOTAL
RESULTS
Patients demographics
The patients demographic characteristics are summarized
in Table I. A total of 833 isolates of uropathogenic E. coli
(n = 610) and K. pneumoniae (n = 223) were collected, of
which, 374 isolates of ESBL-EC and 168 isolates of
ESBL-KP. Overall, 74% of the isolates were from female
patients (75% of ESBL-EC isolates, 58% of the ESBLKP isolates). The overall mean patient age was 54 ( 27)
years; and respectively 54 ( 27) and 52 ( 29) years for
patients with ESBL-EC and ESBL-KP. More than half
of the isolates in both ESBL groups came from patients
> 60 years of age (54% for both ESBL-EC and ESBLKP). The inpatient recovery rates of ESBL-EC and ESBLKP isolates were 42% and 52%, respectively.
Antimicrobial susceptibility
Table II shows the susceptibility rates of ESBL-EC
and ESBL-KP isolates vs. non-ESBL isolates. Imipenem
showed the best activity against ESBL and non-ESBL isolates, 99.7% vs. 100% for E. coli, and 98.8% vs. 100% for
K. pneumoniae. Amikacin showed comparable susceptibility rates to imipenem for E. coli (96% for ESBL-EC
and 100% for non-ESBL-EC) and non-ESBL-KP (100%)
but not in ESBL-KP (79%). Nitroflurantoin was highly
effective against ESBL-EC and non-ESBL-EC (95% and
97%), but it was not as effective against ESBL-KP and
non-ESBL-KP isolates (29% and 44%). Susceptibility
rates to all other antimicrobials simultaneously tested,
including fosfomycin, were significantly higher for nonESBL-producing isolates. Susceptibility to fosfomycin
was 86% vs. 97% for ESBL-EC and non-ESBL-EC isolates, and 62% vs. 78% for ESBL-KP and non-ESBL-KP
isolates. Fosfomycin and nitroflurantoin were significantly
more effective against ESBL-EC than ESBL-KP. CiproTABLE II
floxacin was significantly more effective against ESBLKP than ESBL-EC, whereas tazocin and Trimeth/sulfa
were more effective against ESBL-EC.
Table III compares the susceptibility rates of ESBL-producing isolates to different antimicrobials for inpatients
versus outpatients. Susceptibility rates for fosfomycin and
other antibiotics were not significantly different between
inpatients and outpatients for the ESBL-EC group. Among
the ESBL-KP group, only isolates from outpatients were
significantly more susceptible to gentamicin and tobramycin than isolates from inpatients. For both inpatient-ESBLEC and ESBL-KP isolates, the most effective agents were
imipenem (99.4% and 97.7%, respectively) followed by
amikacin (95% and 72%, respectively). For other antimicrobials, different inpatient susceptibilities were observed
between ESBL-EC and ESBL-KP being higher for the former against nitroflurantoin (93% and 35%), fosfomycin
(87% and 58%) and tazocin (72% and 41%).
Table IV shows the distribution of fosfomycin-resistant
ESBL isolates among different age groups. For ESBL-EC,
resistance was spread with close incidence almost along
all age brackets. For ESBL-KP, the prevalence of resistance was relatively high among all age groups except for
the age group 6-35 years where the number of cases was
too small to evaluate.
DISCUSSION
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS*
Amikacin
Aztreonam
Cefepime
Cefotaxime
Ceftazidime
Ciprofloxacin
Gentamicin
Imipenem
Nitroflurantoin
Piperacillin-tazobactam (Pip/taz)t
Tobramycin
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Fosfomycin
Escherichia coli
ESBL
Non-ESBL
(n = 374)
(n = 236)
360
10
97
7
60
91
168
373
354
281
118
98
321
(96)
(3)
(26)
(2)
(16)
(24)
(45)
(99.7)
(95)
(75)
(32)
(26)
(86)
236
236
236
232
236
166
210
236
229
227
203
134
229
(100)
(100)
(100)
(98)
(100)
(70)
(89)
(100)
(97)
(96)
(86)
(59)
(97)
p**
0.003
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.427
0.163
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
(79)s
(2)
(30)
(4)
(19)
(41)s
(42)
(98.8)
(29)s
(45)s
(26)
(19)s
(62)s
55
53
56
52
54
39
50
56
24
52
50
40
43
(100)
(96)s
(100)
(95)
(98)s
(71)
(91)
(100)
(44)s
(95)
(91)
(73)
(78)s
t
0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.457
0.079
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.022
Pip/taz = Tazocin
TABLEAU III
ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS*
Amikacin
Aztreonam
Cefepime
Cefotaxime
Ceftazidime
Ciprofloxacin
Gentamicin
Imipenem
Nitroflurantoin
Piperacillin-tazobactam
Tobramycin
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Fosfomycin
(95)
(3)
(25)
(2)
(13)
(23)
(46)
(99.4)
(93)
(72)
(31)
(26)
(87)
212
5
58
4
41
57
97
218
211
169
70
59
186
(97)
(2)
(27)
(2)
(19)
(26)
(45)
(100)
(97)
(78)
(32)
(27)
(85)
DISTRIBUTION OF FOSFOMYCIN-RESISTANT
ESBL ISOLATES AMONG AGE GROUPS*
(n = 40)
(n = 25)
(n = 14)
(n = 18)
(n = 22)
(n = 29)
(n = 57)
(n = 169)
Total (n = 374)
4
3
3
3
3
5
5
27
(10)
(12)
(21)
(16)
(13)
(17)
(9)
(16)
53 (14)
(n = 31)
(n = 6)
(n = 2)
(n = 4)
(n = 12)
(n = 17)
(n = 25)
(n = 71)
Total (n = 168)
16 (51)
2**
1**
0
5 (42)
7 (41)
4 (16)
29 (40)
64 (38)
p**
0.240
0.590
0.727
0.951
0.122
0.498
0.845
0.237
0.087
0.260
0.886
0.758
0.739
(72)
(2)
(26)
(2)
(16)
(40)
(26)
(97.7)
(35)
(41)
(18)
(19)
(58)
70
2
28
5
17
33
46
80
19
38
27
14
52
(88)
(3)
(35)
(6)
(21)
(41)
(58)
(100)
(24)
(48)
(34)
(18)
(65)
0.056
0.923
0.212
0.198
0.373
0.846
< 0.001
0.175
0.104
0.390
0.021
0.762
0.349
infections. Nevertheless, its frequent use lead to the emergence of carbapenem resistant enterobacteriaceae isolates
[13, 15-16]
Aminoglycosides are considered as an alternative therapy to ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae. In our study,
both gentamicin and tobramycin exhibited low susceptibility (26% to 45%) against both ESBL-EC and ESBLKP where amikacin was more effective (79% to 96%)
against both ESBL-producing groups. However, these
agents should be used with caution especially in complicated cases because of its ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity.
Thus, fosfomycin can be an appropriate alternative to
aminoglycosides.
Nitroflurantoin was effective against ESBL-EC (95%)
but not against ESBL-KP (29%). This suggests that nitroflurantoin can be a good choice for treatment of UTIs
caused by ESBL-EC. However, its use is limited because
of its nephrotoxicity.
In treating hospital acquired infections, choosing the
appropriate initial antibiotic has a significant impact on
mortality [28]. In our study, the results show that effective
antimicrobial choices for treating inpatients with ESBLEC uropathogens include imipenem, amikacin, nitroflurantoin, and fosfomycin, while those against ESBL-KP
include imipenem, amikacin and fosfomycin.
The age relation to overall antimicrobial agents in our
study showed increasing resistance with increasing age.
This finding is consistent with what was previously reported on the impact of age on resistance in UTIs [29-31].
Concerning fosfomycin, resistance versus age showed
almost comparable incidence among all age brackets indicating no preference for any age group. The high incidence
of resistance in patients 5 years of age is most likely due
to being mostly hospitalized inpatient cases (Table IV).
The valuable information revealed in this study is not
infallible since a couple of limitations can be cited. For
example, the method used for susceptibility testing in our
study is the disk diffusion method. Although this method
has been well standardized for most antimicrobials tested,
de Cueto et al. [32] described a discrepancy between different methods used for testing the susceptibility to fosfomycin. For example, compared to agar dilution method,
the disk diffusion method reported greater resistance to
fosfomycin in ESBL-KP isolates, but not in ESBL-EC
isolates [32]. Moreover, the classification of inpatient versus outpatient presented in our study may not satisfy the
criteria for classification as hospital-acquired versus community-acquired infections. This is so because some outpatients in this study may have been recently discharged
from a hospital in which they acquired the infection. This
may decrease the susceptibility rates in our outpatient
group.
To conclude, this study shows a high in-vitro activity of
fosfomycin against ESBL-EC and less so against ESBLKP uropathogens in Lebanon in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Such a finding makes fosfomycin a plausible agent to treat these resistant uropathogens. Nitroflurantoin was effective against ESBL-EC only.
146 Lebanese Medical Journal 2012 Volume 60 (3)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The excellent technical assistance and support is acknowledged for the Bacteriology staff: Lina Itani, Hassan Beyh,
Sohair Sabi, Rania Hammoud, Aline Avedissian, Rima
Asmar, Maguy Malak, and Nadia Ayyash.
REFERENCES
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.