Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A written commitment to pay, by a buyer's or importer's bank (called the issuing bank)
to the seller's or exporter's bank (called the accepting bank, negotiating bank,
or paying bank).
A letter of credit guarantees payment of a specified sum in a specified currency,
provided the seller meets precisely-defined conditions and submits the
prescribed documents within a fixed timeframe. These documents almost always
include a clean bill of lading or air waybill, commercial invoice, and certificate of origin.
To establish a letter of credit in favor of the seller or exporter (called the beneficiary)
the buyer (called the applicant or account party) either pays the specified sum
(plus service charges) up front to the issuing bank, or negotiates credit. Letters of
credit are formal trade instruments and are used usually where the seller is unwilling
to extend credit to the buyer. In effect, a letter of
credit substitutes the creditworthiness of a bank for the creditworthiness of the buyer.
Thus, the international banking system acts as an intermediary between far flung
exporters and importers. However, the banking system does not take on
any responsibility for the quality of goods, genuineness of documents, or any
other provision in the contract of sale. Since the unambiguity of the terminology used
in writing a letter of credit is of vital importance, the International Chamber Of
Commerce (ICC) has suggested specific terms (called Incoterms) that are now almost
universally accepted and used. Unlike a bill of exchange, a letter of credit is a
nonnegotiable instrument but may be transferable with the consent of the applicant.
Although letters of credit come in numerous types, the two most basic ones are (1)
Revocable-credit letter of credit and (2) Irrevocable-credit letter of credit, which comes
in two versions (a) Confirmed irrevocable letter of credit and (b) Notconfirmed irrevocable letter of credit.
A letter of credit is a document from a bank guaranteeing that a seller will receive payment in full
as long as certain delivery conditions have been met.
In the event that the buyer is unable to make payment on the purchase, the bank will cover the
outstanding amount. They are often used in international transactions to ensure that payment will
be received where the buyer and seller may not know each other and are operating in different
countries. In this case the seller is exposed to a number of risks such credit risk, and legal
risk caused by the distance, differing laws and difficulty in knowing each party personally. A letter of
credit provides the seller with a guarantee that they will get paid as long as certain delivery
conditions have been met. For this reason the use of letters of credit has become a very important
aspect of international trade.
The bank that writes the letter of credit will act on behalf of the buyer and make sure that all delivery
conditions have been met before making the payment to the seller. Most letters of credit are
governed by rules promulgated by the International Chamber of Commerceknown as Uniform
Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits. Letters of credit are typically used by importing and
exporting companies particularly for large purchases and will often negate the need by the buyer to
pay a deposit before delivery is made.
They are also used in land development to ensure that approved public facilities (streets, sidewalks,
storm water ponds, etc.) will be built. The parties to a letter of credit are the supplier, usually called
the "beneficiary", "the issuing bank", of whom the buyer is a client, and sometimes an advising
bank, of whom the beneficiary is a client. Almost all letters of credit are irrevocable, i.e., cannot be
amended or canceled without mutual consent of all parties.
Terminology
Origin
The name "letter of credit" derives from the French word "accrditation", a power to do something,
which derives from the Latin "accreditivus", meaning trust.
Related terms
Negotiation means the giving of value for draft(s) or document(s) by the bank authorized to
negotiate, with the nominated bank. Mere examination of the documents and forwarding the
same to the LC issuing bank for reimbursement, without giving of value / agreed to give, does
not constitute a negotiation.
Advising Bank advises the beneficiary at the request of the issuing bank.
Applicant the party on whose request the issuing bank issues a credit .
Banking dayThe day on which a bank is regularly open at the place at which an act to be
performed.
Beneficiary the party who is to receive the benefit (payment) of the LC. The consignee of
an LC and the beneficiary may not be the same. The credit is issued in the beneficiary's favor.
Honour to act according to commitment of the LC. Presentations are honored in different
ways depending on the type of credit:
Making payment at sight for sight LC.
Incurring a deferred payment undertaking and paying at maturity for deferred payment LC.
Accepting a draft drawn by the beneficiary and paying at maturity for deferred acceptance
LC.
Accordingly, if the documents tendered by the beneficiary, or his or her agent, are in order, then in
general the bank is obliged to pay without further qualifications.
The policies behind adopting the abstraction principle are purely commercial
and reflect a partys expectations: first, if the responsibility for the validity of
documents was thrown onto banks, they would be burdened with
investigating the underlying facts of each transaction, and less inclined to
issue documentary credits because of the risk and inconvenience. Second,
documents required under the LC could in certain circumstances be
different from those required under the sale transaction. This would place
banks in a dilemma in deciding which terms to follow if required to look
behind the credit agreement. Third, the fact that the basic function of the
credit is to provide a seller with the certainty of payment for documentary
duties suggests that banks should honor their obligation notwithstanding
allegations of buyer misfeasance.[2] Courts have emphasized that buyers
always have a remedy for an action upon the contract of sale and that it
would be a calamity for the business world if a bank had to investigate every
breach of contract.
The principle of strict compliance also aims to make the banks duty of
effecting payment against documents easy, efficient and quick. Hence, if the
documents tendered under the credit deviate from the language of the credit
the bank is entitled to withhold payment, even if the deviation is purely
terminological.[3] The general legal maxim de minimis non curat lex has no
place in the field.
Types
Import/export The same credit can be termed an import or export LC[4] depending on
whose perspective is considered. For the importer it is termed an Import LC and for the exporter of
goods, an Export LC.
Revocable The buyer and the bank that established the LC are able
to manipulate the LC or make corrections without informing or getting
permissions from the seller. According to UCP 600, all LCs are
irrevocable, hence this type of LC is obsolete.
Transferrable The exporter has the right to make the credit available
to one or more subsequent beneficiaries. Credits are made transferable
when the original beneficiary is a middleman and does not supply the
merchandise, but procures goods from suppliers and arranges them to
be sent to the buyer and does not want the buyer and supplier know
each other.
The middleman is entitled to substitute his own invoice for the supplier's and acquire the
difference as profit.
A letter of credit can be transferred to the second beneficiary at the request of the first
beneficiary only if it expressly states that the letter of credit is "transferable". A bank is not
obligated to transfer a credit.
A transferable letter of credit can be transferred to more than one alternate beneficiary as
long as it allows partial shipments.
The terms and conditions of the original credit must be replicated exactly in the transferred
credit. However, to keep the workability of the transferable letter of credit, some figures can
be reduced or curtailed.
Amount
Expiry date
Presentation period
Pricing
Issuance charges, covering negotiation, reimbursements and other charges are
paid by the applicant or as per the terms and conditions of the LC. If the LC
does not specify charges, they are paid by the Applicant. Charge-related terms
are indicated in field 71B.
Legal basis
Legal writers have failed to satisfactorily reconcile the banks undertaking with any contractual
analysis.[clarification needed] The theories include: the implied promise, assignmenttheory,
the novation theory, reliance theory, agency theories, estoppels and trust theories, anticipatory
theory and the guarantee theory.[5]
Although documentary credits are enforceable once communicated to the beneficiary, it is difficult to
show any consideration given by the beneficiary to the banker prior to the tender of documents. In
such transactions the undertaking by the beneficiary to deliver the goods to the applicant is not
sufficient consideration for the banks promise because the contract of sale is made before the
issuance of the credit, thus consideration in these circumstances is past. However, the performance
of an existing duty under a contract may be a valid consideration for a new promise made by the
bank, provided that there is some practical benefit to the bank[6] A promise to perform owed to a
third party may also constitute a valid consideration.[7]
Another theory asserts that it is feasible to typify letter of credit as a collateral contract for a thirdparty beneficiary because three different entities participate in the transaction: the seller, the buyer,
and the banker. Because letters of credit are prompted by the buyers necessity and in application
of the theory of Jean Domat the cause of a LC is to release the buyer of his obligation to pay
directly to the seller. Therefore, a LC theoretically fits as a collateral contract accepted by conduct or
in other words, an implied-in-fact contract under the framework for third party beneficiary where the
buyer participates as the third party beneficiary with the bank acting as the stipulator and the seller
as the promisor. The term "beneficiary" is not used properly in the scheme of an LC because a
beneficiary (also, in trust law, cestui que use) in the broadest sense is a natural person or other
legal entity who receives money or other benefits from a benefactor. Note that under the scheme of
letters of credit, banks are neither benefactors of sellers nor benefactors of buyers and the seller
receives no money in gratuity mode. Thus is possible that a letter of credit was one of those
contracts that needed to be masked to disguise the consideration or Privity requirement. As a
result this kind of arrangement, would make letter of credit to be enforceable under the
action assumpsit because of its promissory connotation.[8]
A few countries, including the United States (Article 5 of the Uniform Commercial Code) have
created statutes in relation to letters of credit. These statutes are designed to work with the rules of
practice including UCP and ISP98. These rules of practice are incorporated into the transaction by
agreement of the parties. The latest version of the UCP is the UCP600 effective July 1, 2007.
[9]
Since the UCP are not laws, parties have to include them into their arrangements as normal
contractual provisions.
Advance payment (most secure for seller) The buyer parts with money first and waits for
the seller to forward the goods.
Documentary Credit (more secure for seller as well as buyer) Subject to ICC's UCP 600,
the bank gives an undertaking (on behalf of buyer and at the request of applicant) to pay the
beneficiary the value of the goods shipped if acceptable documents are submitted and if the
stipulated terms and conditions are strictly complied with. The buyer can be confident that the
goods he is expecting only will be received since it will be evidenced in the form of certain
documents called for meeting the specified terms and conditions while the supplier can be confident
that if he meets the stipulations his payment for the shipment is guaranteed by bank, who is
independent of the parties to the contract.
Documentary collection (more secure for buyer and to a certain extent to seller) Also
called "Cash Against Documents". Subject to ICC's URC 525, sight and usance, for delivery of
shipping documents against payment or acceptances of draft, where shipment happens first, then
the title documents are sent to the buyer's bank by seller's bank, for delivering documents against
collection of payment/acceptance
Direct payment (most secure for buyer) The supplier ships the goods and waits for the
buyer to remit the bill, on open account terms.
Risk situations
Fraud Risks
The payment will be obtained for nonexistent or worthless merchandise against presentation
by the beneficiary of forged or falsified documents.
Non-delivery of Goods
Short shipment
Inferior quality
Damaged in transit
Foreign exchange