Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
CITATION
READS
77
2 authors, including:
Khasro Miah
North South University
24 PUBLICATIONS 30 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Article
A Comparative
Study of HRM Practices
between Foreign
and Local Garment
Companies in Bangladesh
SE
FO
R
ER
IA
L
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to explore and compare human resource management (HRM) practices between foreign and local garment companies operating in Bangladesh. This study surveyed 30 human resource, administrative and
factory managers of different levels of three garment companies: one US subsidiary, one UK subsidiary and one Bangladesh company. Results show that a blend
of HRM practices has been adopted by the foreign companies, ranging between
imitating home country practices and host country practices. Results also found
that foreign garment companies focus more on home country HRM practices,
especially in the area of selection and recruitment, training and development,
performance appraisal process and top management appointments. Foreign
garment companies are widely adopting host country HRM practices in industrial relations and compensational benefit. However, Bangladeshi local garment
company is following traditional HRM practices and showing interest in learning
from the foreign company HRM practices. Since this study is based on a limited
number of companies, generalization of findings of this study for cross-cultural
adaptation/adjustment in other developing countries should be made with caution. Combination of home and host country HRM practices can have a positive
influence on transfer of HRM practices in developing nations. It could open a
new avenue for further potential research on HRM practices in the South Asian
business context, especially in the garment industry.
Keywords
HRM practices, Bangladesh, US, UK, garment industry
Md. Khasro Miah, Professor, School of Business, North South University, Dhaka,
Bangladesh. E-mails: khasro@northsouth.edu; ksmnsu@gmail.com
Muhammed Siddique Hossain, Senior Lecturer, School of Business, North South
University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. E-mails: s.hossain@northsouth.edu; s.hossain355@gmail.com
68
Introduction
FO
R
ER
IA
L
SE
In recent years, many research studies have been conducted on human resource
management (HRM) practices in host countries through the subsidiaries of multinational companies (MNCs) (Farley, Hoenig & Yang, 2004; Ferner, 1997; Gamble,
2003). The main drawback of the existing research is the restricted focus on
Western MNCs (Almond, Edwards & Clark, 2003; Edwards & Ferner, 2004;
Farley, Hoenig & Yang, 2004; Ferner & Quintanilla, 1998; Ferner & Varul, 1999;
Guest & Hoque, 1996; Innes & Morris, 1995; Muller, 1998; Tayeb, 1998). A limited number of studies have been conducted on this issue in the context of developing countries (Miah & Bird, 2007; Miah & Wali, 2012).
The spread of MNCs in developing countries and their ability to break through
cross-border constraints in exercising home country HRM practices has been an
issue in research. The rapid progress of the South Asian countries, especially
Bangladesh, has attracted foreign investment, which demands efficient HRM practices. Previous studies revealed that cross-cultural research is continuing to be written from either an American or European point of view, rather than from an
international perspective (Adler & Ghadar, 1991; Brewster & Scullion, 1997).
A number of scholars have identified a need for more research on HRM practices
in South Asia due to the limited number of comparative HRM studies between
developing and developed countries (Budhwar & Sparrow, 2001; Miah & Kitamura,
2005; Miah, Wakabayashi & Takeuchi, 2003). One primary issue in the literature is
to what extent MNCs and their subsidiaries practices resemble the parent company
and host country practices. Several authors have acknowledged that HRM represents a major restriction when MNCs are trying to implement global strategies in
the different cultural and institutional framework of each affiliate where the MNCs
operate (Edwards, 2004; Myloni, Harzing & Mirza, 2003).
When adopting HRM strategies and practices, MNCs have identified dual pressures of home and host country institutional atmosphereboth push and pull force
(Farley et al., 2004; Hillman & Wan, 2005; Rosenzweig & Nohria, 1994; Taylor,
Beechler & Napier, 1996). These dual pressures have an effect on HRM practices of
MNCs at subsidiary level in the South Asian countries. Earlier comparative researches
on HRM in South Asia have identified the significance of firms national origin and
culture (Awasthi, Chow & Wu, 2001; Bae, Shyh-jer & Lawler, 1998; Chow, Harrison,
McKinnon & Wu, 2000; Chow, Shields & Wu, 1999; Hofstede, 1993; Huang, 2000;
Miah & Bird, 2007). These studies also addressed how cultural and institutional differences affect the sharing of HRM strategies and practices by MNCs.
There is a close association between organizational structures and decentralization of employment relations. A considerable variation of MNCs involvement on
different dimensions of HRM practices is observed (Hamill, 1992). Japanese MNCs
have greater control over HRM practices in their subsidiaries (Beechler & Yang,
1994; Dedousis, 1994; Pudelko & Harzing, 2008). Some MNCs are controlling their
HRM structures globally taking into account the host countries policies and practices, as some researchers found a blend of HRM practices in MNCs subsidiaries
South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 1, 1 (2014): 6789
69
(Hannon, Huang & Jaw, 1995; Taylor & Bechler, 1993). Rarely an MNC is found to
completely follow home country HRM practices. The headquarters influences
depend on the employment regulation in the host country and the role of individual
subsidiaries (Harzing, 2004; Myloni, 2002; Rosenzweig & Nohira, 1994).
FO
R
ER
IA
L
SE
Western MNCs often tend to transfer their parent companys HRM practices in
order to control their local subsidiaries through parent country expatriates. The
parent company influences and the standardization of different HRM activities
depends on the headquarters approach to the subsidiarys HRM practices as well
as on the scope of the employees mobility across different subsidiaries (Mahmood,
2004). The country of origin effect on an MNCs HRM practices has begun to
receive renewed attention by several researchers and has given birth to an interesting debate between home country versus host country effect (Glover & Wilkinson,
2007; Guest & Hoque, 1996; Innes & Morris, 1995; Roche & Geary, 1996;
Rosenzweig & Nohria, 1994). A central question is whether the HRM of foreign
subsidiaries is determined by the foreignness of the invested capital (country of
origin) or by locally prevalent customs and practices (Roche & Geary, 1996). The
foreign expatriates tend to adopt culturally distinctive HRM practices to obtain
employee loyalty and commitment to their company. The home country strategy
is to reward performance instead of seniority as the pay structure is often totally
aligned with performance (Nazir, Shah & Zaman, 2012).
MNCs have three strategic choices: ethnocentric, polycentric and geocentric
(Heenan & Perlmutter, 1979; Koh, Gammoh & Okoroafo, 2014; Perlmutter, 1969).
However, when it comes to transferring HRM practices abroad, other factors, such
as the host country environment, may limit the MNCs freedom to choose among
the above strategies, etc., and therefore require careful consideration. MNCs are
opting for the strategy that fits best with each subsidiarys local conditions (Tayeb,
1998). Thus, a company having subsidiaries in foreign countries may adopt an
ethnocentric strategy for some and a polycentric or even a global one for others.
Furthermore, as many authors have argued, such a typology treats management
practices in terms of an overall orientation, which may overlook MNCs internal
differences (Rosenzweig & Nohria, 1994). Some companies are more responsive
to pressures of local adaptation, and some are more prone to internal consistency.
Likewise, some management practices of the parent company are closely followed,
while others are similar to those of the host country in the same subsidiary.
70
ER
IA
L
SE
FO
R
This UK-based garment company manufactures high quality ready-made garments at competitive prices for some of the world famous retailers. Total asset
value of the company is around $5,099.4 million. The crucial factors behind its
success are its innovative services in product development, fabric sourcing, technical support and teamwork. This company offers quality products at reasonable
prices and meets high standards and it has indeed one of the highest compliance
ratings in comparison to many Bangladeshi companies. It was incorporated in
Dhaka Export Processing Zone (DEPZ) in 1997.
This company is renowned for a vibrant and dynamic management team. The
key strengths of this company are said to be constant monitoring of industry
standards, technical know-how and technology and standard quality control system. The company operates within the international retail ethics policy. The company is now in a position to show versatility and to meet deadlines under rigid
conformity requirements.
71
FO
R
Methodology
ER
IA
L
SE
For this research, one Bangladeshi garment company, one US-based and one
UK-based garment company operating in Bangladesh were selected. Table 1 provides background information of these three companies. The comparative
research on Ready Made Garment (RMG) industry in HRM area is very limited.
A judgement sampling was used in order to collect in-depth information to
achieve the objective of the study. A questionnaire, consisting of different dimensions of HRM practices was developed to collect the data from the selected companies. Some of the dimensions included in the questionnaire are: recruitment,
training and development, promotion policy, performance appraisal, compensation, etc. An official appointment with the HRM managers was scheduled; the
questionnaire was handed in to the interviewees ahead of time; and face to face
interviews with the interviewees were completed afterwards. From a selected
pool of (10 3) 30 managershuman resource, administrative and factory
from the respective companies, data were collected with the structured questionnaire from all 30 respondents and then, face to face semi-structured interviews
were conducted.
South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 1, 1 (2014): 6789
72
Bangladesh
UK
US
Dhaka
Dhaka
Dhaka
Main product
Country of origin
Bangladesh
Apparel
Solutions
UK
US
Establishment year
2004
1997
1988
Number of employees
1,500
2,000
1,800
61%
82%
10
350
5,099.4
3,056.7
55%
Nil
Nil
% of overseas market US $
in millions)
$100
$5,400
$6,500
10
10
10
37
IA
L
14,000
23,000
22,000
45/year
12 days/year
12 days/year
FO
R
35
Master degree
32
Master degree
Average education
Medium
High
High
Moderate
High
High
Moderate
Very low
Low
Master degree
Average age
Interviewed manager
SE
No of foreign expertise
ER
% Foreign capital
73
ER
IA
L
SE
contrast the findings, equivalence of research methods and research administration at the data collection stage was taken into consideration.
To take into an account the process dynamics of the gradual evolution with
distributed questionnaire, retrospective and real-time data in the interview meeting were collected. With the proper permission and consent of the respondents, all
interviews were tape-recorded on-site and notes on the discussion were taken.
Then, recorded conversation was transcribed and translated, when needed, from
Bengali to English. Thereafter, all interview transcripts were shown to the interviewees for verification. The data were categorized in different groups related to
HRM transferability issues.
After collecting information from all the interviews and structured questionnaire, the narratives were reviewed, compared and then contrasted with the facts
of these three cases. A general explanation of the cause and effect relationship was
developed for all HRM practices. The relevant information is then used to rearrange the evidence into categories between foreign and local garment companies
and to explain the occurrence of HRM phenomena or causal relationships among
the transferability of HRM practices in Bangladesh (Piekkari, Nell & Ghauri,
2010; Mahmud, n.d.). A number of summary tables are prepared to demonstrate
the similarities and differences of HRM practices between foreign and local garment companies in Bangladesh.
Results
FO
R
Table 2 shows the hiring and selection approaches of foreign and local garment
companies. Results indicate that the Bangladeshi garment company uses less
standardized selection methods. It prefers internal recruitment, makes more use of
references, base their selection on less objective criteria compared to foreign companies. However, curriculum vitae and interviews play an important role in
employee selection in the local garment company. The interviews with local HR
manager revealed that recommendations and social networking are not as important. Moreover, the local garment company places emphasis on internal recruitment and less on qualifications, which is an indication of a slow shift of the local
company towards the use of more objective selection criteria.
US- and UK-based garment companies are using structured recruitment methods. When it comes to managerial and professional/technical recruitments, they
advertise externally, conduct competency-based interviews and use recruitment
agencies frequently.
For clerical employee recruitment, internal advertisement and word of mouth
recruitment are used by the foreign companies. The foreign companies put high
importance on designing and evaluating outcome of the training of employees and
coordinating less on local cultural norms and values in the selection process.
South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 1, 1 (2014): 6789
74
Bangladesh
UK
US
Promotion
of current
employees
Not practised
Method of
advertisement
Walk-in, referrals,
newspaper, posters
Walk-in, referrals,
Walk-in, referrals,
newspaper, websites newspaper, websites
Recruitment
sources
Internal
Internal, external
Use of
recruitment
agencies
Not practised
Some times
Apprentices
Not practised
Some times
Some times
Not practised
References
check
Not always
Yes
Aptitude test
No
Yes
FO
R
Psychometric
testing
Internal, external
Not practised
IA
L
ER
SE
Yes
Moderate influence in
decision-making
75
Bangladesh
UK
US
Design and
development
Unstructured
36 hours training is
mandatory per year,
Training
implementation
Less priority
given to on-thejob training
Training evaluation
and outcome
No structured
method found
Training outcome
considered with high
importance while
designing the next
training programme
Depends on
in-house and
outsourced
sources
Influence of parent
company training
strategy
Not applicable
as it is a local
company
Strong influence
observed
Training location
Home country
Coaching by
supervisors
In-house resource
gets main focus
ER
IA
L
SE
Training outcome
considered
with moderate
importance while
designing the next
training programme
Moderate influence,
local subsidiary
mainly decides the
training strategy
Home and host
country
Followed
sometimes
depends on
needs
Considered a highly
effective tool
Considered a highly
effective tool
Not practised
Overseas training
Not practised
Department heads
are sent for overseas
training depending
upon the need
Techniques
for employee
development
Coaching by
supervisors or
department
seniors
Coaching,
apprenticeship,
informal learning, job
rotation, role playing
Coaching, informal
learning, role playing
Skill training by
outside agency
Not practised
Sometimes
FO
R
T
Job rotation
76
Table 4. Comparison of Performance Appraisal Process between the Local and Foreign
Companies
Firms country
of origin
Bangladesh
UK
US
Unstructured
Time interval
of performance
appraisal
Once a year
Problems of
performance
appraisal
Feedback of
performance
appraisal
Influence of parent
company
IA
L
SE
Methods of
performance
appraisal
Not applicable
as it is a local
company
Followed in a limited
extent headquarter
adoption is visible
ER
To a moderate extent,
headquarter adoption
is visible
Performance Appraisal
FO
R
77
Table 5. Comparison of Compensation and Benefits between the Local and Foreign
Companies
Firms country
of origin
Bangladesh
UK
US
Compensation
structure
Moderate
Structured
Designing of
compensation
strategy
Follow market
trends
Non-monetary
benefits
Not practised
Payment system
Based on
Based on company
company payroll payroll system added with
system
performance bonus
Parent company
influence
Not applicable
as it is a local
company
Structured
SE
Success celebration,
paid vacation with
family
IA
L
Based on company
payroll system
ER
Gratuity, provident
fund
Festival and
performance bonus
Festival bonus
FO
R
Monetary
rewards
Yes. However,
mid and
professional
level posts are
dominated by
male
Equal
employment
opportunity
The formula for compensation seems to be comparable with the local company. In designing compensation strategy, the local company follows market
trends and the foreign companies use competency-based payment system. Nonmonetary benefits are also practised by the foreign companies such as team recognition, paid vacation, overseas tours and success celebration. The local company
tends to show its preference towards a seniority based pay system. In foreign
companies, home country practices do exist in the case of compensation. The
equal employment opportunity (EEO) law is practised in foreign companies.
However, this concept is partially practised by the local company. In the area of
compensation and benefits, parent company influence was not visible.
South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 1, 1 (2014): 6789
78
Table 6. Comparison of Promotion Policy between the Local and Foreign Companies
Firms country
of origin
Bangladesh
UK
US
Importance
of supervisors
recommendation
Highly important
Importance of loyalty
the company
Loyalty considered
irrelevant,
competency counts
Age as promotion
criterion?
To a moderate
extent
No
Gender as promotion
criterion?
No
No
Importance of right
attitudes and values
Highly important
Promotion test
Not practised
Not practised
Not practised
Importance of
performance appraisal
on promotion
Performance
appraisal is not
practised
To a great extent
To a moderate
extent
Parent company
influence
Not applicable
as it is a local
company
Strong influence
in decision-making
regarding head count
No influence, local
subsidiary is the
sole authority for
promotion
SE
IA
L
No
FO
R
ER
No
Promotion Policy
Table 6 shows that job tenure and competence get priority in the foreign companies for promotion. Job tenure is, however, the sole promotion criterion in the case
of the local company.
Technical competency is the core criterion for promotion at foreign companies.
Importance of employee loyalty, attitudes and values get the highest priority in
both local and foreign companies. In regard to company influence, unlike US, the
UK-based company has showed influence in decision-making.
Industrial Relation
Table 7 demonstrates that all the companies have maintained a good relationship
between the management and employees. Company rules and regulations are to
South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 1, 1 (2014): 6789
79
Table 7. Comparison of Industrial Relation between the Local and Foreign Companies
Firms country of origin
Bangladesh
UK
US
Moderate
Good relationship
employee relation between
management
and employees
Good relationship
between
management
and employees
Strictly
maintained
Maintained but
human side is also
taken care of
Maintained. Given
high importance
Administrating labour
agreements
Controlled by
management
Labour agreements
are catered with
proper care
Maintained with
proper care
Bargaining process
Most informal
Informal
Informal
SE
No
No
Influence of parent
company
Not applicable
as it is a local
company
No influence is
observed
No
Visibility of political
engagement among
employee within office
No influence is
observed
Not visible inside
office
ER
IA
L
FO
R
be strictly followed by the local as well as foreign companies. Similarly, administrative labour agreements are maintained with proper care at both the local and
foreign companies. In all companies, an informal bargaining culture is established
and employees are highly willing to solve the crisis if any arises. The political
engagement of employees is not visible on the factory premises. Nonetheless,
none of the companies, local or foreign, allows trade unions.
80
Table 8. Comparisons of HRM Practices between the Local and Foreign Companies
Firms country
of origin
UK
US
Recruitment
and selection
Training and
development
Low in conducting
training needs
systematically, less
priority on-the-job
training is practised
IA
L
ER
Individual
performance based
pay system with
work experience.
Success celebration,
paid vacation with
family for talented
performers
Frequency: formal
and systematic used.
Measure of
performance:
individual
performance.
Purpose: provide
feedback
Informal criteria
such as emphasis on
informal participation
and group or likeminded involvement,
a cooperative group
action, loyalty
FO
R
Performance
appraisal
Management
appointments
criteria
SE
Bangladesh
Moderate employee
participation in decision
related to execution
No trade union
Less employee
participation in
monitoring quality
No trade union
Moderate employee
participation in
decision related to
execution
No trade union
SE
Participatory
management
and industrial
relations
81
ER
IA
L
FO
R
Table 9. HRM Adaptation between Home and Host Country Effect in Foreign Companies
Firms country of origin
US
Industrial relation
Organizational communication
UK
Performance appraisal
Participatory management
82
Table 10. The Effect of HRM Transfer between Home and Host Country in Foreign
Companies
Firms country of origin
UK
US
High
Moderate
Low
Moderate
FO
R
ER
IA
L
SE
effects in the area of selection and recruitment, performance appraisal, organizational communication and host country effect in the area of training and development, industrial relation, compensation and benefit and middle and lower level
management appointments criteria. The foreign companies are, however, following their home country HRM practices in areas like top management appointments criteria and participatory management.
Table 10 gives a representation of the level of transfer of HRM practices of UK
and US subsidiaries operating in Bangladesh. Both the subsidiaries are observed
following a mixed hybrid system. Both of the companies transfer their home
country HRM practices and adopt less HRM practices from the host country.
Level of parent affiliate and level of home HRM adaptation is high in UK-based
firm. On the other hand, the US-based garment companys HRM adaptation and
level of parent affiliate are moderate. Employee commitment and satisfaction are
quite high in both the foreign companies.
The findings indicated the importance of the strategic integration of balanced
HRM practices for achieving optimum results in foreign companies. These companies
demonstrated concerted efforts in their HRM practices. The foreign companies
planned and integrated HR activities innovatively to strengthen the relationship
between the organization and employees.
Discussion
The results reveal that the three companies of this study are addressing the primary challenge of nurturing a committed workforce that is competent in fulfilling
organizational goals and continually exploring new ways to improve performance.
It is observed that the two foreign companies in Bangladesh have adopted a combination of home and host country HRM practices. Both push and pull force factors are at play in the operation of garment companies in Bangladesh. In
determining strategic issues, expansion and reduction of workforces, push force is
at work. The pull force is exercised for ensuring compliance to the host countrys
practices in the process of HRM implementation. Like Japanese MNCs in US, US
South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 1, 1 (2014): 6789
83
FO
R
ER
IA
L
SE
MNCs in China (e.g., Farley et al., 2004), German MNCs in the UK (Ferner &
Varul, 1999), US MNCs in the UK (Ferner, Almond & Colling, 2005), UK and US
MNCs in RMG sector tend to accept a mixture of both home and host country
practices. The effect of home country is significant both in strategic and functional areas of HRM practices. In terms of the primary HRM issues, the main
strategic decision-making depends on headquarters in UK and US, especially, on
issues such as workforce expansion and reduction. When subsidiary is important,
head quarter wants to keep operations under control rendering decisions from
home country. Moreover, Bangladesh is lacking high level HR professionals and
standardization of HRM practices.
It appears that MNCs, having their headquarters in UK and US adopt a hybrid
approach in managing their relationship with the local subsidiaries. UK and US
subsidiaries tend to comply with the home country practices, especially in the area
of recruitment and selection, performance appraisal, organizational communication, top management appointment criteria and participative management. Due to
strong pressure from the host country to conform with the local environment, the
subsidiaries were more influential in relation to decisions on compensation and
benefit, training and development, industrial relations and middle and lower management appointments criteria.
Institutional influences from the host country, such as legal environment and
utilization of local resources, are the priority for UK and US garment companies
in Bangladesh. Local practices such as reference checking are commonly used by
UK and US garment companies in Bangladesh. This suggests that due to the tight
budget and cost control over the subsidiaries, HR managers are sensitive to minimizing recruitment costs. Results suggest that individual performance is widely
used for rewarding and promoting employees. The behaviour of MNCs in host
countries may be a blend or hybrid in which host country norms reconcile the
influence of the home country blueprint (Innes & Morris, 1995; Schuler &
Jackson, 1987), where both home country and host country effects account for the
measure of individual performance. Study results suggest that both individual performance output and adoption of headquarter performance measure were commonly adopted in the foreign companies. An implication of choice of a modified
style is the influence of host country national culture, and accordingly, the middle
way approach has been implemented by the foreign companies in Bangladesh.
A few key factors seem to influence the foreign garment companies in developing the HRM policies internationally. There is an agreement that the transfer of
knowledge internationally is a key requirement for successful MNCs (Bartlett &
Ghoshal, 2000; Evans, Pucik & Barsoux, 2002; Mariappanadar, 2005; Poedenphant,
2002). Differences of opinion occur about factors that influence the adaptation
of HRM policies and practices from MNCs to MNC subsidiaries. A range of other
factors does impact transfer success and adaptation. These factors include the
impact of social, political, economic and strategic context. The pressures for global
integration versus local responsiveness and the evolving mentality MNCs are
facing (Bartlett & Ghoshal, 2000).
South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 1, 1 (2014): 6789
84
FO
R
ER
IA
L
SE
To respond to these challenges, the MNCs are obliged to develop global competitiveness, multinational flexibility and worldwide learning capability. That is,
a cultural orientation towards learning, innovation and change is most likely to
result in more positive attitudes towards the transfer process, which may lead to
the eventual success of the MNCs (Bartlett & Ghoshal, 1989; Herkenhoff, 2000;
Poedenphant, 2002). This effect is not practice specific, since it reflects characteristics of the subsidiary that apply to all types of activities associated with learning,
innovation and change in general. Therefore, MNCs have a need to formally control and coordinate their subsidiaries. This outcome can be achieved through
reporting systems and targets, or less formally through relationships and the bonds
of corporate culture (Bartlett & Ghoshal, 1989; Dowling, Schuler & Welch, 1987).
With these forms of control, trust between the involved parties is a key element
(Bartlett & Ghoshal, 1989).
In this study, we found that both US and UK garment companies are not adopting local HRM practices, but rather transferring headquarter influence to operate
business in Bangladesh. Assigning specialists in specific HR issues with global
responsibility, such as a top management appointment, as occurs in UK and US
cases, undermines the opportunity of the assigned specialist to develop personal
relationships or a deep understanding of a country or region (Adler, 2001; Dowling
et al., 1999). The Asian subsidiaries regard the assigned headquarter specialist as
effective, which suggests that the formal control mechanism does work well. This
renders the HR headquarter staff assigned to the subsidiary virtually powerful and
with parent country effect (Dowling et al., 1999; Evans et al., 2002). The parent
company trains the local employees to implement headquarter developed training
practices to have some level of control on the quality of the work and employee
performance.
In an effort to explore the distinctive features of HRM practices across the companies, this study has analyzed and explored HRM practices adopted by two UKand US-based companies and one Bangladesh company. HRM practices used by
UK and US companies and local Bangladesh company are identified. The results
suggest that these two MNCs behave similarly to MNCs from US and UK which
tend to transfer the concepts and practices of HRM system from parent company
to their subsidiaries in Bangladesh; for example, union avoidance strategy. At the
same time, they are adopting varied HR approaches in Bangladesh due to home
and host country effect.
Results indicate that certain major socio-cultural and institutional norms push
the MNCs to adjust practices conforming to local model (Miah & Wali, 2012;
Tayeb, 1998). The companies engage in a considerable degree of HRM transfer,
which results in mixed HRM practices. The conflict that arises is due to the fact
that certain HRM practices are more restricted and affected by the host countrys
South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 1, 1 (2014): 6789
85
FO
R
ER
IA
L
SE
References
Adler, N. (2001). International dimensions of organisational behavior (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South Western College Publishing.
Adler, N., & Ghadar, F. (1991). Strategic human resource management: A global perspective. In R. Pieper (Ed.), Human resource management: An international comparison
(pp. 235259). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Almond, P., Edwards, T., & Clark, I. (2003). Multinationals and changing business systems
in Europe: Towards the shareholder value model. Industrial Relations Journal, 34(5),
430445.
Awasthi, V.N., Chow, C.W., & Wu, A. (2001). Cross-cultural differences in the behavioral
consequences of imposing performance evaluation and reward systems: An experimental investigation. The International Journal of Accounting, 36(3), 291309.
86
FO
R
ER
IA
L
SE
Bae, J., Shyh-jer, C., & Lawler, J.J. (1998). Variations in human resource management in
Asian countries: MNC home-country and host-country effects. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(4), 653670.
Banai, M. (1992). The ethnocentric staffing policy in multinational corporations: A self
fulfilling prophecy. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 3(3),
451472.
Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association. (BGMEA) (2012). Retrieved September 2013 from http://www.bdyellowbook.com/catalog/Garments_
Accessories/Garments_Composite_ Textile_Industries/Bgmea-info17798.html
Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: Transnational solution.
Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
. (2000). Transnational management: Text, cases and readings in cross-broader
management (3rd ed.). Boston: Irwin-McGraw Hill.
Beechler, S., & Yang, J. (1994). The transfer of Japanese-style management to American
subsidiaries: Contingencies, constraints and competencies. Journal of International
Business Studies, 25(3), 467492.
Brewster, C., & Scullion, H. (1997). A review and agenda for expatriate HRM. Human
Resource Management Journal, 7(3), 3241.
Budhwar, P., & Sparrow, P. (2001). An integrative framework for determining India and British
HRM practices: An empirical study. Management International Review, 38(2), 105121.
Chow, C.W., Harrison, G.L., McKinnon, J.L., & Wu, A. (2000). The organisational, culture
of public accounting firms: Evidence from Taiwanese local and US affiliated firms.
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(5), 347361.
Chow, C.W., Shields, M., & Wu, A. (1999). The importance of national culture in the design of preference for management controls for multinational operations. Accounting,
Organizations and Society, 24(56), 441461.
Dedousis, V. (1994). The core workforce-peripheral workforce dichotomy and the
transfer of Japanese management practices. In N. Campbell, & F. Burton (Eds),
Japanese multinationals: Strategies and management in the global Kaisha. London:
Rutledge.
Dowling, P.J., Schuler, R.S., & Welch, D.E. (1999). International human resource management: Managing people in a multinational context (p. 314). South-Western College
Publishing, Cincinnati.
Edwards, T. (1998). Multinationals, labor management and the process of reverse diffusion: A case study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(4),
696709.
. (2004). The transfer of employment practices across borders in multinational
companies. In A.W. Harzing, & J.V. Ruysseveldt (Eds), International human resource
management (pp. 389410). London: SAGE.
Edwards, T., & Ferner, A. (2004). Multinationals, reverse diffusion and national business
systems. Management International Review, 24(1), 5181.
Evans, P., Pucik, V., & Barsoux, J.L. (2002). The global challenge: Frameworks for IHRM.
New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Farley, J.U., Hoenig, S., & Yang, J.Z. (2004). Key factors influencing HRM practices of
overseas subsidiaries in Chinas transition economy. International Journal of Human
Resource Management, 15(45), 688704.
Ferner, A. (1997). Country of origin effects and HR in multinational companies. Human
Resource Management Journal, 7(1), 1937.
87
FO
R
ER
IA
L
SE
Ferner, A., Almond, P., & Colling, T. (2005). Institutional theory and the cross national
transfer of employment policy: The case of Workforce Diversity in US multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3), 304321.
Ferner, A., & Quintanilla, J. (1998). Multinationals, national business systems and HRM:
The enduring of national identity or a process of Anglo-Saxonisation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(4), 710731.
Ferner, A., & Varul, M.Z. (1999). The German way: German multinationals and human
resource management. London: Anglo-German Foundation.
Gamble, J. (2003). Transferring human resource practices from the United Kingdom to
China: The limits and potential for convergence. The International Journal of Human
Resource Management, 14(3), 369387.
Glover, L., & Wilkinson, A. (2007). Worlds colliding: The translation of modern management practices within a UK based subsidiary of a Korean-owned MNC. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(8), 1437.
Guest, D., & Hoque, K. (1996). National ownership and HR practices in UK Greenfield
Sites. Human Resource Management Journal, 6(4), 5075.
Hamill, J. (1992). Employment effects on changing multinational strategies in Europe.
European Management Journal, 10(3), 334340.
Hannon, J., Huang, I., & Jaw, B. (1995). International HR Strategy and its determinants:
The case of subsidiaries in Taiwan. Journal of International Business Strategies, 26(3),
531554.
Haque, M. (2013, 13 January). Businesses not in favour of FDI in basic RMG sector:
Chinese FDI encouraged in high-end products. New Age Online. Retrieved September 2013 from http://www.newagebd.com/detail.php?date=2013-01-13&nid=36539.
UUyuBVd5d8Q
Harzing, A. (2004). Composing in international staff. In A. Harzing, & J. Ruysseveldt
(Eds), International human resource management (2nd ed.), (pp. 251282). London:
SAGE Publications.
Heenan, D.A., & Perlmutter, H.V. (1979). Multinational organization development.
Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Herkenhoff, L. (2000). National remuneration preferences: Cultural analysis within the
Hofstede model (PhD thesis). University of Western Australia, Perth, WA.
Hillman, A., & Wan, W.P. (2005). The determinants of MNE subsidiaries political strategies: Evidence of institutional duality. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3),
322340.
Hofstede, G. (1993). Cultural constraints in management theories. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 8195.
Huang, T. (2000). Human resource management practices at subsidiaries of multinational
corporations and local firms in Taiwan. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(1), 2228.
Innes, E., & Morris, J. (1995). Multinational corporations and employee relations: Continuity and change in a mature industrial region. Employee Relations, 17(6), 2542.
Koh, Anthony C., Gammoh, Bashar S., & Okoroafo, Sam C. (2014). An investigation of
export practices and performance across global. International Business Research, 7(1),
6072. doi: 10.5539/ibr.v7n1p60
Mahmood, M. (2004). The institutional context of human resource management: Case
studies of multinational subsidiaries in Bangladesh, Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
University of Manchester, UK.
88
FO
R
ER
IA
L
SE
89
FO
R
ER
IA
L
SE
Roche, W., & Geary, J. (1996). Multinational companies in Ireland: Adapting to or diverging from national industrial relations practices and traditions? Irish Business and
Administrative Research, 17(1), 1431.
Rosenzweig, P., & Nohria, N. (1994). Influences on human resource management practices in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2),
229251.
Schuler, R.S., & Jackson, S.E. (1987). Organisational strategy and organisational level as
determinants of human resource management practices. Human Resource Planning,
10(3), 125141.
Tayeb, M. (1998). The competitive advantage of nations: The role of HRM and its sociocultural context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(2),
588605.
Taylor, S., & Bechler, S. (1993). Human resource management system integration and adaptation in multinational firms. In S. Prasad (Ed.), Advances in international comparative management (Vol. 8, pp. 155174). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Taylor, S., Beechler, S., & Napier, N. (1996). Toward an integrative model of strategic
international human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 21(4),
959985.
Yeh, R. (1987). Management practices of Taiwanese firms: As compared to those of
American and Japanese subsidiaries in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,
8(1), 114.
N
FO
R
ER
C
IA
L
SE