Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • United States v. Rolandus Pipkin, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Încărcat de

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 vizualizări2 pagini
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Rolandus Pipkin's motion to modify the judgment revoking his supervised release. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Descriere originală:

    Filed: 2012-02-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7175

    Drepturi de autor

    © Public Domain

    Formate disponibile

    PDF sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Rolandus Pipkin's motion to modify the judgment revoking his supervised release. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Drepturi de autor:

    Public Domain
    Descărcați ca PDF sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    2 vizualizări2 pagini

    United States v. Rolandus Pipkin, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Încărcat de

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Rolandus Pipkin's motion to modify the judgment revoking his supervised release. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Drepturi de autor:

    Public Domain
    Descărcați ca PDF sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7175

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    ROLANDUS DEMETRIUS PIPKIN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
    Chief District Judge. (1:00-cr-00134-JAB-1)

    Submitted:

    January 31, 2012

    Decided:

    February 3, 2012

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Rolandus Demetrius Pipkin, Appellant Pro Se.


    Paul Alexander
    Weinman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Winston-Salem,
    North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Rolandus Demetrius Pipkin appeals the district courts
    order denying his motion to modify the district courts judgment
    revoking his supervised release.
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record


    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v. Pipkin,

    No. 1:00-cr-00134-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. July 22, 2011).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    S-ar putea să vă placă și