Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
No. 12-6882
JAMES WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
L. CALTON,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
B. CALTON; CAPTAIN LKU; TERRY O'BRIEN; LALOUDE, Staff
Counselor; CRUM; SHOEMAKER; CALTON, (brother to B. Calton);
CAMPBELL; DELORES; WILLIS; MR. CHAMBERS; LALONDE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:10-cv-00075-GEC-RSB)
Submitted:
Decided:
March 8, 2013
MOORE,
Roanoke,
Appellee Pro Se.
Virginia,
for
Appellant.
James
Williams,
PER CURIAM:
James
Correctional
Williams
Officer
L.
filed
Calton,
Bivens
charging
action
that
against
Calton
used
in
Jonesville,
Virginia.
Finding
that
Calton
violated
damages
to
Williams
but
did
not
award
punitive
matter
of
law
arguing,
as
he
had
in
earlier
Whether
prison
official
has
violated
the
Eighth
determine
whether
the
prison
Specifically, we
official
acted
with
whether
the
inmate
was
deprivation
suffered
sufficiently
or
serious
injury
inflicted
(objective
on
the
component).
To
establish
an
the
subjective
component
in
the
context
of
maliciously
causing harm.
Calton
argues
and
sadistically
for
the
very
purpose
of
the
district
court
erred
by
denying
his
be
but
one
reasonable
conclusion
as
to
the
verdict.
Ocheltree v Scollon Prods., Inc., 335 F.3d 325, 331 (4th Cir.
2003) (en banc) (quoting Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477
U.S. 242, 250 (1986)).
301,
citation
312
(4th
omitted).
determinations
or
Cir.
2010)
This
weigh
the
(internal
court
may
evidence
quotation
not
and
make
must
marks
and
credibility
disregard
all
Caltons
entitled
argument
that
he
is
to
qualified
immunity
Cir. 1994), with Wilkins v. Gaddy, 559 U.S. 34, 130 S. Ct. 1175,
1178 (2010).
Accordingly,
we
affirm.
We
dispense
with
oral