Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • United States v. Walton, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Încărcat de

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 vizualizări2 pagini
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Eric Arthur Walton's petition for a writ of error coram nobis. The three-judge panel reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The panel affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in United States v. Walton, No. CR-77-83 (N.D.W. Va. May 4, 2001). Oral arguments were dispensed with because the facts and legal issues were clearly presented to the court.

    Descriere originală:

    Filed: 2001-10-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6930

    Drepturi de autor

    © Public Domain

    Formate disponibile

    PDF sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Eric Arthur Walton's petition for a writ of error coram nobis. The three-judge panel reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The panel affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in United States v. Walton, No. CR-77-83 (N.D.W. Va. May 4, 2001). Oral arguments were dispensed with because the facts and legal issues were clearly presented to the court.

    Drepturi de autor:

    Public Domain
    Descărcați ca PDF sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    6 vizualizări2 pagini

    United States v. Walton, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Încărcat de

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Eric Arthur Walton's petition for a writ of error coram nobis. The three-judge panel reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The panel affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in United States v. Walton, No. CR-77-83 (N.D.W. Va. May 4, 2001). Oral arguments were dispensed with because the facts and legal issues were clearly presented to the court.

    Drepturi de autor:

    Public Domain
    Descărcați ca PDF sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6930

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ERIC ARTHUR WALTON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior
    District Judge. (CR-77-83)

    Submitted:

    October 3, 2001

    Decided:

    October 16, 2001

    Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Eric Arthur Walton, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Eric Arthur Walton appeals the district courts order denying
    his petition for a writ of error coram nobis.

    We have reviewed the

    record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible


    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    United States v. Walton, No. CR-77-83 (N.D.W. Va. May 4,

    2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    S-ar putea să vă placă și