Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • Sloan v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Încărcat de

    Scribd Government Docs
    17 vizualizări3 pagini
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Samuel H. Sloan's civil action as frivolous. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its February 24, 2009 order dismissing the case. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Descriere originală:

    Filed: 2009-08-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-1476

    Drepturi de autor

    © Public Domain

    Formate disponibile

    PDF sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Samuel H. Sloan's civil action as frivolous. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its February 24, 2009 order dismissing the case. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Drepturi de autor:

    Public Domain
    Descărcați ca PDF sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    17 vizualizări3 pagini

    Sloan v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Încărcat de

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Samuel H. Sloan's civil action as frivolous. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its February 24, 2009 order dismissing the case. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Drepturi de autor:

    Public Domain
    Descărcați ca PDF sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-1476

    SAMUEL H. SLOAN, a/k/a M. Ismail Sloan,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CHRISTOPHER P. SMITH; J. L. AYERS, III, Sheriff; MICHAEL W.
    COX; WILLIAM STARKE MUNDY, III; JAMES C. TURK; WILLIAM G.
    PETTY; RICHARD S. MILLER; ROY B. WILLETT; LAWRENCE JANOW;
    MICHAEL GAMBLE; STEPHEN R. PATTISON;
    RAY FITZGERALD; JOHN
    P. BUTLER; EUGENE WINGFIELD; FRANK G. DAVIDSON, III; RICHARD
    GROFF; LISA L. SCHENKEL; KILLIS
    B. HOWARD; SUE H. ROE;
    CATHERINE H. KENNEDY; DORCHEN LEIDHOLDT; ROSEMONDE PIERRELOUIS; ALEXANDER KARAM; SALVATORE J. MODICA; LANE VANCE;
    VERIO.NET; KHALID SHAIKH MUHAMMED; GEORGE W. BUSH; GEORGE
    H.W. BUSH; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED
    STATES OF AMERICA; LEIGHTON S. HOUCK; CHARLES ROBERTS; JAY
    ROBERTS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Lynchburg.
    Norman K. Moon, District
    Judge. (6:09-cv-00005-NKM)

    Submitted:

    August 20, 2009

    Before WILKINSON and


    Senior Circuit Judge.

    MICHAEL,

    Decided: August 24, 2009

    Circuit

    Judges,

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    and

    HAMILTON,

    Samuel H. Sloan, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Samuel

    H.

    Sloan

    appeals

    the

    district

    dismissing as frivolous this civil action.


    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Sloan v. Smith, No.

    6:09-cv-00005-NKM (W.D. Va. Feb. 24, 2009).


    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    order

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    oral

    courts

    and

    materials

    We dispense with

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    S-ar putea să vă placă și