Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
No. 14-4806
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (1:95-cr-00266-JAB-2)
Submitted:
SHEDD,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
HAMILTON,
Senior
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Wayne Cameron appeals his sentence of 51 months
imprisonment imposed by the district court upon revocation of
his supervised release.
district
court
has
broad
discretion
We affirm.
when
Webb,
738
F.3d
638,
sentence
that
is
plainly
unreasonable
640
within
(4th
the
will
Cir.
be
maximum
affirmed
on
United States
2013).
statutory
imposing
revocation
and
is
appeal.
not
Id.
(quoting United States v. Crudup, 461 F.3d 433, 438 (4th Cir.
2006)).
In
so
reasonableness,
utilizing
considerations
sentence.
A
evaluating
employed
sentence,
the
in
we
procedural
evaluating
an
assess
and
it
for
substantive
original
criminal
revocation
sentence
is
procedurally
reasonable
if
the
(2012)
factors
enumerated
in
18
U.S.C.
3583(e)
provide
an
explanation
for
its
chosen
sentence,
but
the
sentence
as
it
must
be
when
imposing
post-
conviction sentence.
reasonable
if
concluding
that
imposed.
to
be
the
district
the
court
defendant
states
should
or
proper
receive
basis
the
for
sentence
substantively
unreasonable
will
we
Id. at 439.
counsel,
allocution
from
Cameron,
the
statutory
maximum
3583(e)
before
sentencing
its
sentence
was
Cameron
at
the
bottom
of
the
lengthy,
it
provided
sentence
of
his
conclude
violations
that
of
Camerons
supervised
sentence
release.
is
We
neither
affirm
the
district
3
courts
judgment
We
revoking
supervised release.
petition
be
filed,
but
counsel
If Cameron requests
believes
that
such
Counsels motion
are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED