Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
No. 14-7434
JOSHUA PATERNOSTER-COZART,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD CLARKE, Director V.D.O.C.,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:13-cv-00539-MSD-LRL)
Submitted:
Decided:
Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Joshua
courts
Paternoster-Cozart
order
accepting,
in
seeks
part,
to
the
appeal
the
district
recommendation
of
the
justice
issues
or
judge
certificate
of
appealability.
28
A certificate of appealability
When the
standard
by
demonstrating
that
reasonable
jurists
would
484
Cockrell,
(2000);
(2003).
see
Miller-El
v.
537
U.S.
322,
336-38
Slack,
October
Paternoster-Cozart
14,
was
2014,
while
released
this
from
appeal
was
incarceration.
pending,
We
may
Friedmans Inc. v.
Dunlap, 290 F.3d 191, 197 (4th Cir. 2002) (internal quotation
marks omitted).
of
the
it,
there
length
is
of
no
his
longer
any
confinement.
live
controversy
Therefore,
his
of
relief
of
on
his
specific
First
Amendment
objections
to
claim.
The
magistrate
timely
judges
of
that
recommendation
when
the
parties
have
been
United States v.
Paternoster-Cozart
Hamdi, 356 F.3d 564, 571 n.8 (4th Cir. 2004) (It is a well
settled rule that contentions not raised in the argument section
of the opening brief are abandoned.).
3
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED